Abstract
Germinal centers (GCs) are a complex and important aspect of humoral immunity. How germinal centers deal with changing antigens remains unclear, yet this biology could be central to next-generation vaccine strategies such as germline-targeting. Here we demonstrate, in a mouse model with HIV Env protein immunogens, that rapid delivery of homologous or heterologous boosts results in highly positive outcomes. Rapid reimmunization expands on-target GC B cell (BGC) populations, which emerge almost exclusively from existing BGC cells. Early homologous boosting avoids prohibitive antibody titers and utilizes off-target antibodies to maximize the BGC response. Heterologous rapid boosting shifts affinity maturation towards the new antigen. The ‘refueled’ GCs are sustained, developing large affinity gains, and rapidly evolving to bind wild-type HIV Env trimer within 56 days, even when using as few as two distinct antigens. These findings provide insights into GC biology and translatable paths to leveraging accelerated GC functions.
INTRODUCTION
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infects 1.3 million new people each year1. Many broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) have been isolated from infected individuals, and passive transfer of bnAbs has been shown to both confer protection in highly stringent non-human primate models and to suppress viremia in infected humans2–6. These and other data support the premise that an HIV vaccine able to elicit bnAbs would be highly efficacious7–9.
Some characteristics of HIV bnAbs disfavor their induction by vaccines10. BnAb precursors are extremely rare in the human naive B cell repertoire11–14. Moreover, the inferred germline BCRs of most HIV bnAbs do not have detectable affinity for the envelope surface protein of HIV (Env), making priming of precursor B cells with Env a particular challenge. This inspired the development of germline-targeting (GT) vaccine strategies and immunogens11–13,15–26. GT proteins are engineered to have high affinity for naïve B-cells containing a VDJ sequence related to bnAbs. Recently, GT immunogens in multiple clinical trials have shown correct bnAb precursor activation and differentiation in germinal centers (GCs)23,26–28.
Full maturation of precursor B cells to bnAbs by GT vaccination requires shepherding affinity maturation and binding specificity with sequential, heterologous, immunogens progressing in similarity to wildtype (WT) Env17–19,26,29. The primary operation model for this task is to use booster immunizations recalling memory B cells to initiate new germinal centers and continue affinity maturation30–33. Sequential immunizations have proven challenging to model in mice, in part due to high circulating antibody titers 30,34–47.
VRC01, a bnAb isolated in 2010, is the prototypic and eponymous member of a highly potent class of bnAbs targeting the HIV Env CD4 binding site (CD4bs)48,49. VRC01-class antibodies are leading candidates for HIV GT vaccine design due to their exceptional breadth and potency5. A central challenge for maturation of VRC01-class precursors is accommodation of the Env N276 glycan that shields the CD4bs17,22,25,50–52. Priming immunogens omit this N276 glycan in order to engage naive VRC01-class precursor B cells.
VRC01-class antibodies share common, genetically-encoded sequence characteristics, resulting in highly conserved structural features53–55. For preclinical modeling, the germline heavy and light chain VRC01 knock-in mouse model (VRC01gHL) uses B cell adoptive transfer to recreate the rarity and germline sequence of VRC01-class precursors in the human repertoire. The VRC01gHL model has been useful in the study of GT vaccines and general vaccine biology51,56–62. A VRC01gHL study successfully predicted the later outcome of the first germline-targeting human clinical trial23,57.
Two mouse model studies have been able to produce VRC01-class BCRs neutralizing WT HIV pseudovirus in multiple animals after vaccination, demonstrating proof-of-principle. One study used 8 immunizations over the course of 60 weeks; another study used 9 immunizations over 81 weeks (~567 days)22,52. Improving upon those efforts is a high priority for HIV vaccine development, and vaccine immunology more broadly.
Slow delivery or escalating dose for priming immunizations in NHPs drives faster, higher, and more consistent HIV tier 2 autologous neutralizing antibody titers, associated with larger and longer lasting GCs63,64. These effects rely on a synchronization of antigen availability with T follicular helper cell priming and early antibody secretion65. Here we explore the GC biology of sequential, heterologous immunizations using similar immunological principles. The resulting GCs are more efficient and robust in maturing HIV neutralizing, germline-targeted B cells and thus elucidate new paradigms of GC biology in mice.
RESULTS
Reimmunization during ongoing germinal centers increases VRC01gHL cell frequencies
Class-switched memory B cells infrequently participate in GCs following conventional boost immunizations in mice. In an effort to bypass this problem, we explored reimmunization of mice during an ongoing GC response. Mice were first seeded with 1,000 VRC01gHL B cells (1 in 106 precursor frequency) and primed with BG505-GT3.1 protein mixed with ISCOM adjuvant (Extended Data Fig.1a,b). A stabilized Env trimer, BG505-GT3.1 has germline targeting mutations grafted onto the CD4bs, giving it affinity (86–240 nM see methods) for the germline VRC01 BCR17,51. A second immunization was given on day 6, 8, 10, or 12, with or without adjuvant. Three days after subcutaneous injections (d+3), the draining inguinal lymph nodes (iLNs) were harvested for analysis. No significant differences were observed in the outcomes of d6–8 reimmunization versus d10–12 for the protein-plus-adjuvant reimmunization groups (Extended Data Fig.1, Lognormal Welch’s t test). Germinal center B (BGC) cells, plasma (BPC) cells, and VRC01gHL GC B cell numbers all increased after reimmunization as compared to singly immunized animals (Extended Data Fig.1c-e). B cells increases after reimmunization depended primarily on antigen inclusion, as protein-only reimmunizations showed equivalent outcomes to protein-plus-adjuvant (Extended Data Fig.1c-g). For all protein-plus-adjuvant reimmunizations, total BGC numbers increased 5- to 7-fold compared to single immunizations. VRC01gHL BGC numbers increased 30- to 84-fold (d10–12 and d6–8, respectively). VRC01gHL cell frequencies in GCs increased from 4–8% to ~33%. In some mice, VRC01gHL cells became the majority of BGC cells (Extended Data Fig.1f). CD4+ T cell increases after reimmunization appeared to depend on adjuvant, while plasma cell (BPC) numbers were increased with protein-plus-adjuvant as well as protein alone (Extended Data Fig.1d,h). These findings are consistent with slow delivery and escalating dose priming investigations in other experimental contexts65,66. Overall, reimmunization with homologous protein at 6 to 12 days post-prime resulted in large increases in VRC01gHL BGC cell numbers three days later.
Heterologous reimmunization at 1-week influenced VRC01-class BCR specificity
Heterologous booster immunizations are required for germline targeting strategies. Therefore, we tested the impact of heterologous early immunizations during ongoing GCs (Fig.1a-g)(Extended Data Fig.2a-l). To the best of our knowledge, no investigations of this kind have been reported. An Env trimer from 001428–2.42 clade C HIV with an N276 glycan mutation was chosen as the sequential antigen, referred to here as 001428-N276Q25,26. Naive VRC01gHL cells have no measurable affinity for 001428-N276Q, confirmed by probe staining (Fig.1b) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) (Extended Data Fig.2a). Reimmunizations using Env trimer and ISCOM adjuvants were given at 1- or 6-weeks and evaluated for GC responses seven days post boost (d+7) (Fig.1a-g). The BGC and CD4+ T cell counts significantly increased after 1-week reimmunization compared to the more conventional 6-week reimmunization (P ≤ 0.001, Fig.1c)(Extended Data Fig.2c). BGC cell totals were 2-fold higher for heterologous reimmunization and 3.3-fold higher for homologous reimmunization when using 1-week reimmunizations (Fig.1c).
Fig.1. BGC specificities after short and long immunization intervals.

a, Experiment schematic. w = week. All groups were transferred and primed on the same day. All immunizations, denoted by full trimer graphic, contained 10μg trimer and 5U ISCOM. Stacked trimers denote three separate animal groups at each timepoint.
b, Representative flow plots of VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) and endogenous (CD45.2+) BGC cells stained with streptavidin-fluorescent probe.
c-g, Collection denotes end point of animal at 2 weeks or 7 weeks. Boost (reimmunization) conditions described in table.
c, Total number (#) BGC cells in inguinal lymph nodes (iLN).
d, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells.
e, Total VRC01 gHL BGC cells binding to 001428-N276Q probe.
f, Total endogenous BGC cells binding 001428-N276Q probe.
g, Percent (%) of VRC01 gHL BGC cells positive for 001428-N276Q of total VRC01 gHL BGC cells in Fig. 1d.
Data are pooled from two independent experiments (n = 5 and n = 7 mice per group). Each dot represents an individual mouse (biological replicate) subjected to a defined immunization regimen. Bars indicate mean (or geometric mean) ± s.d. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test; NS, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. See also Extended Data Fig. 2a.
Homologous reimmunization at 1-week boosted VRC01gHL cell frequencies and numbers to levels 24-fold higher than what conventional 6-week reimmunization elicited (Fig.1d). Animals receiving 1-week homologous reimmunization had the largest numbers of 001428-N276Q+ VRC01gHL BGC cells amongst all groups, despite being 001428-N276Q antigen naïve (Fig.1e). Endogenous antigen-specific BGC cells were not boosted by 1-week immunizations (Fig.1f, Extended Data Fig.2f). Endogenous mouse B cells have been shown to predominantly target the non-neutralizing, Env-trimer base67.
Heterologous immunization at 1-week increased total numbers of BGC cells compared to 6-week reimmunizations (Fig.1c). VRC01gHL B cells were comparable in number to heterologous reimmunization at 6-weeks (Fig.1d-f). Strikingly, heterologous 1-week reimmunization increased the frequency of 001428-N276Q probe-binding (001428-N276Q+) VRC01gHL cells compared to non-boosted or homologously boosted animals at matching timepoints (70% vs 30%, P < 0.0001, Fig.1g). Comparing heterologous to unboosted animals after 2 weeks, the boost is also seen to expand the 001428-N276Q+ VRC01gHL cell numbers reaching significance (P = 0.019 Fig. 1e).
In sum, although naive VRC01gHL cells do not bind 001428-N276Q, 1-week heterologous booster immunization resulted in rapid increases in 001428-N276Q+ VRC01gHL BGC cell numbers and frequencies 7 days after boosting.
GC B cells rapidly responded to heterologous antigen
To investigate the kinetics of the BGC cells and their antigen-binding specificities following reimmunization, we studied GC responses over a period of three weeks after homologous (BG505-GT3.1) or heterologous (BG505-N276D) reimmunization (Fig.2a). Similar to 001428-N276Q, BG505-N276D has no detectable affinity for the naïve VRC01gHL BCR17,51. Upon reimmunization with homologous or heterologous protein at d12, BGC cell frequencies rapidly (d+3) increased for both groups (Fig.2b). VRC01gHL BGC cells expanded the greatest amount after homologous reimmunizations (Fig.2c). BG505-N276D-binding VRC01gHL cells were detected after homologous or heterologous reimmunization (Fig.2d), with the most rapid increase in BG505-N276D+ VRC01gHL BGC cell frequencies observed after heterologous reimmunization (Fig.2e). BG505-N276D+ VRC01gHL BGC cells were sustained for multiple weeks (Fig.2f).
Fig.2. Kinetics and origins of B cells responding to reimmunizations.

a, Experiment schematic for b-f. d = days post prime. d+ = days post reimmunization. Stacked trimers denote three separate animal groups at each timepoint.
b, Total BGC cells in inguinal lymph node (iLNs).
c, Total VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) BGC cells.
d-f, VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) BGC cells binding to BG505-N276D probe by percentage e and total f.
b-f, Means connected with line. n per group displayed in table below graph. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected Dunn’s test for each boost type to unboosted group displayed in colored text above graph. Nine experiments or timepoints were compiled, each experiment comprised all three immunization groups.
g, Schematic for h,i.
h, iLN via fluorescent staining. VRC01gHL B cells constitutively expressing GFP detected with antibody. Scale bar, 1μM. Dotted line denotes organ boarder.
i, Scale bar, 100nM. Inserts from h with additional panel from d+0 mouse GC without VRC01gHL B cell transfer. h,i, One of two iLNs imaged per group, each group n=1.
j, Schematic of experiment for k. d = day. d+ = days post reimmunization. Stacked trimers are three separate groups.
k, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells from iLN. A CD45.1+ and GFP+ population was reported from each mouse. Originating from first transfer (red circles, 45.1+ /GFP-) or from second transfer (green circles, CD45.1- /GFP+) Prime only controls were in same experiment and received only one transfer of VRC01gHL cells as depicted in legend table. n= 7,7,6,5,3 respectively for groups from left to right. j,k Experiment performed in duplicate with one presented. Plotted P = 0.0031 and NS respectively. Geometric mean and ± SD shown.
a-k, Kruskal Wallis uncorrected Dunn's test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
Homologous reimmunization at 1-week had resulted in higher VRC01gHL BGC cell numbers, 8- and 15-fold over controls for d+3 and d+7 respectively (Extended Data Fig.1e, Fig.1d). It was unknown whether these increases were the result of newly primed VRC01gHL cells or expansion of existing VRC01gHL BGC cells. We therefore performed a series of experiments to determine the ontogeny of the expanded BGC cells. Immunofluorescence histology was performed on draining iLNs excised before or after reimmunization at d7 (Fig.2g). VRC01gHL-GFP cells were transferred at day −1 prior to the priming immunization and detected using an anti-GFP fluorescent antibody. Large GCs with many VRC01gHL-GFP cells were observed at d+3 after reimmunization (Fig.2h,i, yellow). The rapidity indicated that expansion of existing VRC01gHL-GFP BGC cells was likely responsible for the GC increases, rather than new priming and differentiation of naive VRC01gHL-GFP cells.
A second experiment was designed to examine this further. A transfer of CD45.1+ VRC01gHL cells before priming was followed by a second transfer of naive GFP-VRC01gHL cells (constitutively expressing GFP), the day before reimmunizations (Fig.2j). Reimmunizations used 001428-N276Q, as in Figure 1. Heterologous reimmunization resulted in no observable naive VRC01gHL cells entering GCs. Mice with no reimmunization did not have GFP+ VRC01gHL cells detectable in their GCs (Fig.2k).
Reimmunization with homologous antigen did result in rare detectable GFP+ VRC01gHL; however, 99% of VRC01gHL cells in the GC were GFP–. Thus, the vast majority of responding VRC01gHL cells were already in GCs prior to reimmunization (Fig.2k). Additionally, GFP+ VRC01gHL cell frequencies in GCs after reimmunization were no higher than GFP+ VRC01gHL cell frequencies in GCs of mice receiving their first immunization (Controls: single transfer, single-immunized on d7, Fig.2k). This result indicated that the naive VRC01gHL cells present at the time of reimmunization received no net advantage in activation and differentiation into BGC cells compared to a naïve priming environment. Thus, homologous or heterologous reimmunization at 1-week during a primary response expanded previously activated VRC01gHL BGC cells.
Antibody titers regulate VRC01gHL cell responses to immunization
Antibodies present at the time of immunization influence B cell responses to antigen39–42,68. Due to different B cell responses after 1-week and 6-week homologous boosts, we sought to measure and then model the antibody landscape at these times of reimmunization. Serum ELISAs for CD4bs-specific IgG and total BG505-GT3.1-specific IgG were performed on immunized mouse serum collected over six weeks (Fig.3a,b). These benchmarks were compared to serum IgG titers of mice that received IgG transfers from immunized animals (Fig.3c-h). To recapitulate pre-existing circulating IgG conditions similar to those present immediately prior to the 1-week reimmunizations described in Figure 1, polyclonal IgG from immunized mice possessing no VRC01gHL cells was used (Fig.3c,e,f, Extended Data Fig.3a). Transfers of low quantities of serum IgG (10–40μg) reconstituted recipient mice with moderate total anti-BG505-GT3.1 IgG titers but minimal CD4bs-epitope specific IgG (Fig.e,f). Presence of pre-existing anti-BG505-GT3.1 IgG without CD4bs specificity resulted in 10-fold enhancement of VRC01gHL cell expansion after BG505-GT3.1 immunization compared to mice with no serum transfer (P < 0.001, Fig.3i,j, Extended Data Fig.3b-e).
Fig.3. Prime resembles 2nd immunization returns when antibody titers are matched.

a-b, Profile specific IgG serum titers in primed mice over six weeks. b, ELISA EC50 μg/ml against BG505-GT3.1 trimer on SA coated plates (left) or eOD-GT5 monomer-coated plates (right, reporting IgG against CD4bs). EC50 min and max of curve fixed. Dotted line represents LOD where curve was interpolated. c, as in b but for eOD-GT5 monomer coated plates.
c-d, Experiment schematic. Total IgG (10–200 μg) was transferred intraperitoneally into mice before immunization. c,e,f,i,j IgG transferred from B6 mice. d,g,h,k,l, IgG transferred from B6 mice possessing VRC01gHL B cells. See also Extended Data Fig.3a.
e-h, Serum titers created in mice on d0. Groups, Low (10–40μg) or High (100–200μg) total IgG transferred. All plots have right hand axis denoting benchmark titers from serum of primed mice various days after immunization run on same plate. Left axis is (ELISA EC50) μg/ml with fixed top and bottom of curve and dotted line denoting where 2 or less points used to match to curve. e,g, BG505-GT3.1 IgG. f,h, CD4bs IgG reported by eOD-GT5 monomer coated plates.
i,k, Total endogenous BG505-GT3.1+ BGC cells binding BG505-GT3.1 probe.
j,l, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells.
c-l, Experiments using IgG without VRC01gHL cells (pink): unrepeated. Experiments using IgG transfer from mice with VRC01gHL B cells (blue): repeat not shown. For all plots groups: None (n=4), Low (n=12), High (n=8). See also Extended Data Fig.3 a-i. For all plots means or geometric means and ±SD plotted. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected Dunn's test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
In a second set of mice, serum IgG was transferred from immunized mice possessing VRC01gHL cells (Fig.3d). These IgG transfers reconstituted recipient mice with high CD4bs-epitope IgG titers, matching circulating IgG titers 6 weeks after immunization (Fig.3b,g,h). Presence of pre-existing anti-CD4bs IgG resulted in 30-fold impairment VRC01gHL BGC cell numbers after BG505-GT3.1 priming compared to mice with no serum transfer (P = 0.015, Fig.3l). IgG transfers similar to 6-weeks increased the number of endogenous BG505-GT3.1-binding BGC cells, cells that do not target the CD4bs (Fig.3e,g,i,k. Extended Data Fig.3f-i). In conclusion, VRC01-class responses were enhanced by pre-existing IgG not targeting the CD4bs but substantially impaired by pre-existing high anti-CD4bs IgG. These data indicate that early reimmunization is both a strategy to leverage low early antibody titers to increase BGC cell frequencies and simultaneously avoid the negative impacts of high circulating antibody titers on BGC cell specificities65,66,69.
Antibody enhancement of vaccine responses has been previously examined in repeated dosing studies, with observations of increased antigen deposition in GCs63,65,66,70. We hypothesized that enhancement of B cell responses herein by rapid boosting may be driven by immune complexes captured by complement receptors, which are highly abundant on follicular dendritic cells (FDCs). To test this, antibody transfers were repeated with the addition of cobra venom factor (CVF) to deplete complement (Extended Data Fig.3j). GC enhancement was lost upon complement depletion (P < 0.01 and < 0.001. Extended Data Fig.3j-l), demonstrating a critical requirement for complement and indicating immune complex formation and deposition on FDCs as the most likely mechanism of action of the antibody-mediated enhancement of rapid development of WT Env trimer-binding BGC.
Rapid evolution of VRC01gHL B cells capable of binding WT BG505 Env
To determine if rapid reimmunization could cause more extensive affinity maturation, sequential immunizations included stabilized wild-type BG505 Env (BG505 MD39), which will be referred to as “BG505-WT”18,71,72. BG505-WT includes the 276 glycan and no germline targeting mutations. This was given as the third and final immunogen on day 14, one week after 001428-N276Q reimmunization (Fig.4a). Vaccine-induction of WT-Env binding VRC01-class B cells has long been acknowledged as a very difficult process, with few reported successes17,22,52. Thus, it was unsurprising that no BG505-WT binding (BG505-WT+) VRC01gHL BGC cells were observed on d+7 after immunization (3 weeks after priming) (Fig.4a-e).
Fig.4. Elicitation of BG505-WT binders through rapid immunization.

a, Experiment schematic.
b, Percent of VRC01gHL within BGC cells.
c, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells in iLNs.
d, Representative plots from each group of VRC01gHL stained with BG505-WT probe.
e, Total VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) BGC cells positive for BG505-WT probe d.
a-e, All groups contain mice from both of two experimental repeats. Final n= 8,7,9,10 left to right for groups plotted. See also Extended Data Fig.4 a-e.
f, Experiment schematic.
g, Percent VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) of total BGC cells in iLN.
h, Total VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) BGC cells positive for BG505-WT probe with brown line as Limit of Detection (LOD) at 50 cells/animal as 1/10th-1/20th of total iLNs were collected.
f-h, See also Extended Data Fig.4g-j. All groups analyzed 8 weeks post prime. Table denotes immunization weeks and contents. All immunizations included adjuvant. Immunizations match previous amounts with the exception: where (2x) or two antigens are listed final amounts of antigen and adjuvant are doubled and mice were given final immunizations at week 6 with analysis at week 7. Multiple experiments were compiled, and not all experiments included all groups. Compiled experiments include groups from Figure 5a(diamonds) and Figure 4a.
Means and SD are represented as bars. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
In the next experiment, the immune response was allowed to continue for ~6 weeks after BG505-WT immunization (Fig.4a, Extended Data Fig.4a-d), given observation of sustained GCs (Fig. 2), and considering the large antigenic distance between BG505-GT3.1 to BG505-WT. Substantial numbers of VRC01gHL BGC cells were detected 6 weeks after the last immunization (Fig.4b,c). Strikingly, high numbers of these VRC01gHL BGC cells bound BG505-WT (~3,600 cells per mouse. Fig.4d,e). Probe staining also tested VRC01gHL binding to 001428-WT and 001428-CD4bs.KO, which confirmed VRC01gHL cells bound the CD4bs epitope (Extended Data Fig.4e). In contrast, endogenous B cells almost exclusively bound non-CD4bs epitopes (Extended Data Fig.4e).
To more precisely determine GC requirements for induction of BG505-WT binding VRC01gHL cells in 56 days, additional immunization experiments were performed (Fig.4f-h, Extended Data Fig.4f-j). First, combinations of homologous and homologous-plus-WT-Env reimmunizations were compared. Homologous BG505-GT3.1 reimmunization at 1-week followed by BG505-WT immunization, one or six weeks later, both generated robust numbers of WT-binding VRC01-class BGC cells (Fig.4h). Notably for the 1-week delivery this occurred in the absence of detectable BG505-WT-binding VRC01gHL BGC cells close to immunization times (Fig.4e). Nonetheless, BG505-WT immunization had a significant impact as it significantly surpassed the homologous GT reimmunization alone (~7,000 vs. ~400 cells median. P = 0.002. Fig.4h). Moreover, a BG505-GT3.1 prime followed by a conventional 7-week BG505-WT boost—a regimen lacking reimmunization—was not sufficient to robustly mature WT-binding VRC01-class cells (Fig.4h).
Next, combinations including heterologous reimmunization were examined (Fig.4h). Strikingly, heterologous reimmunization with 001428-N276Q Env trimer at 1-week was sufficient to robustly generate BG505-WT VRC01gHL cells 7 weeks later (Fig.4h). Thus, immunization with BG505-WT was not required to evolve BG505-WT binding VRC01gHL B cells. Finally, longer periods of maturation after late BG505-WT immunization (+4 weeks) were tested; overall patterns were maintained (Extended Data Fig.5a,b). In sum, by utilizing rapid reimmunizations it was possible to evolve large populations of BG505-WT binding VRC01-class cells with only two immunogens and 56 days.
Differential VDJ SHM outcomes
To better understand the swift development of WT Env binding by VRC01-class B cells after rapid reimmunizations, an in depth examination of SHM and affinity maturation was initiated. VRC01gHL BGC cells (CD45.1+) from 6 experimental groups were FACS sorted and single cell sequenced for VDJ content (Fig.5a-d, Extended Data Fig.5c). A DNA oligo-barcode was conjugated to the SA-BV421 used for the BG505-WT probe73. The total numbers of VRC01-class WT-binding B cells were similar across each rapid boosting regimen (Fig.5b,c), as in the full data set shown in Figure 4.
Fig.5. VDJ sequencing of VRC01gHL BGC cells shows antigen-driven mutations.

a, Experiment schematic.
b, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells. Table denotes immunization weeks and contents. All immunizations included adjuvant.
c, Percent of all VRC01gHL BGC cells binding BG505-WT probe. See also Extended Data Fig.5c.
a,b,c, Single experiment with group n=5 displayed. Means and SD are represented as bars. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
d, Table denoting each GEM 10x reaction, number of pooled animals, single cell VDJ sequences recovered
e, Average cumulative mutations in amino acid sequence plotted per GEM reaction for light chain (LC) and heavy chain (HC) variable regions. Pearson correlation (two-sided); r and P values shown.
f, Histogram of mutations at each residue of LC and HC where blue denotes schedules using only BG505 Envs and green denotes groups immunized with both BG505 and 001428 Env. See also Extended Data Fig.5a.
g, Group-level associations of each mutation from germline was tested using two-sided Chi-squared tests with FDR correction. Cliff's Delta effect sizes were calculated, where values range from −1 to +1 for enrichment in regimens excluding or including 001428 Env respectively. Displayed top ~10% of total significant mutations found (P < 10–30). Bar graphs denote percent of sequences in each group with that mutation. See also Extended Data Fig.5b.
Microfluidics emulsion-based single cell RNA sequencing yielded 8,000 individual VRC01-class VDJ sequences across all groups (Fig.5d). The heavy chains (HC)s averaged 9–13 amino acid (a.a.) mutations for reimmunized groups and light (LC) chains averaged 3–5 a.a. mutations per group. Plots show the average of each gel-in-bead emulsion (GEM) originating from distinct pooled animals (Fig.5d). Groups immunized with 001428-based Env exhibited differential accumulation of LC and HC mutations compared to groups exclusively receiving BG505-based Env proteins (P = 0.0005, Fig.5e), and the ratio of LC to HC was inversely correlated (r = −0.76). SHM varied across LC and HC VDJ a.a. positions, with pronounced enrichments in L-CDR1 and H-CDR1 and H-CDR2 (Fig.5f).
When viewing VDJ sequences by group with germline residues masked, marked trends appeared among BG505 scaffolded-trimer regimens and mixed scaffold regimens (Extended Data Fig.6a). To quantify this, 7,000 complete VDJ’s across the six immunization groups were analyzed for effect-size correlations of individual a.a. mutations to either BG505-only or mixed-scaffold regimens (Extended Data Fig.6b,c). 355 significant (adjusted P < 0.05) mutations were identified (Extended Data Fig.6b). The top differential mutations were analyzed in detail (Fig.5g). Among LC mutations, immunization regimens using only BG505 selected CDR1 S31R and S30R mutations in 10% to 18% of clones. This was likely due to the presence of the negatively charged sidechain N276D in BG505-GT3.1 and not in 001428-N276Q available for L-CDR1 charged contacts51. BG505-only regimens mutated E1 in their first position with 53% frequency (P = 0). The mutation of the nucleotides in this codon interrupted our annotation pipeline so the E1A/G assignment was inferred post analysis (Extended Data Fig.6c).
For H-CDR1 in BG505-only regimens Y32H was a commonly selected mutation (73%) (Fig.5g). In contrast, in 001428-containing immunizations Y32H was only modestly selected (15%) and H35N increased from 15% to 76% instead. Either Y32H or H35N can create H-CDR3 loop-stabilizing hydrogen bonds, which may promote different H-CDR3 orientations51. In the H-CDR2, immunization regimens using 001428-N276Q resulted in multiple strongly selected mutations (Fig.5g). This included S54R (S55R) – main notations refer to Kabat numbering, italics refer to direct residue number – a mutation which occurred in 91% of sequences after 001428-N276Q, whereas in BG505-only groups either R or G mutations were commonly selected (Fig.5g. Extended Data Fig.6c). The H-CDR2 position T57I (T58I) was found in 45% of BG505-only regimen BCRs, while T57I was almost never detected after 001428-N276Q immunization (1% occurrence, Fig.5g). Residues Q61 (Q62) and K62 (K63) were observed to be frequently mutated only after 001428-containing immunization regimens (Fig.5f). The combination of H-CDR2 T57, Q61, and K62 mutation data indicate that a strong contact by H-CDR2 may be differentially selected between the two immunogen choices. Overall, deep BCR mutational analysis of HC and LC revealed many mutations highly correlated to reimmunization immunogen exposure.
Correlations of mutations to WT Env binding
DNA oligo-WT-probe UMI counts per cell by scRNAseq paralleled BG505-WT BV421 MFIs by flow cytometry (Fig.6a), indicating probe counts were a proxy for BCR affinity to BG505-WT. Conversely, probe UMI counts did not directly correlate with average total mutations per group, indicating differential impacts of distinct mutations on the ability of the VRC01gHL BCR to bind WT Env (Fig.6b). WT Env probe binding did not significantly correlate with two VRC01-class scoring metrics (VRC01-class HC score from Briney et. al., Fig.6a, nor VRC01 “key residue” score averages shown in Extended Data Fig.7a), but VRC01 key residue score did correlate with total HC mutations (Extended Data Fig.7a)17,23,25.
Fig.6. SHM substitutions associated with BG505-WT binding.

a, Top, representative flow cytometry plots of all VRC01gHL (CD45.1+) BGC cells from one animal, both axes are probe staining with BG505-WT. Bottom, entire groups' scRNA paired VDJ sequences plotted as 2D histograms, y-axis is VRC01-class HC score for residue matches to VRC01-bnAbs (see Methods) and x-axis is UMI counts of oligo-BG505-WT probe acquired per cell.
b, Per GEM average total mutations versus average total probe-UMI counts. Pearson correlation (two-sided); r and P values shown.
c,d, Correlations between mutations and probe-UMI output were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was determined by Mann-Whitney U test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. Top 10% of mutations with FDR-corrected p < 0.05 for both tests and frequency >1% are shown (see Extended Data Fig.6c,d) separated by antibody chain, trimer regimen used, and positive (c) or negative (d) correlations. Also plotted are percent of sequences in probe-bound or unbound population that contain designated mutation. Final column two columns are whether literature cites residue makes contact with Env and what published human bnAbs share this mutation and position.
Next each individual VDJ mutation was correlated to probe UMI count increases. Separate analyses were performed for BG505-only and 001428-containing regimens. The top positive and negative correlations by FDR corrected P-values were examined (Fig.6c,d and Extended Data Fig.7c,d). Mutations identified by probe-UMI-correlation were largely consistent with differential mutations observable in sequence logos (Extended Data Fig.7b).
LC mutations associated with WT Env binding were examined. For VRC01-class human bnAbs, selection of small residues or deletions in L-CDR1 is important to allow for accommodation of the N276 glycan55,74. In this study, S28, S30, and S31 with G/T mutations were positively correlated with BG505-WT binding (Fig.6d). Additionally, L-CDR1 deletions were present in all reimmunized groups, with the highest frequencies observed in group D (6.4%. 124 sequences with L-CDR1 deletions in group D. Extended Data Fig.6a).
In HCs strong Y33F correlations (P = 10–22 and 10–13) corroborate prior structure-function studies of VRC01-class antibodies demonstrating that reduction of the Y33 bulky side chain improves virus neutralization22,75. S54 (S55) was mutated in nearly 100% of BCR sequences becoming S54R or S54R/G/H/N for the two different regimens (Extended Data Fig.6a). Many human VRC01-class bnAbs rely on this H-CDR2 position to mimic F43 of CD4 using bulky side chains (F/T/Y/R/W)48. The commonality of S54R may explain why our correlations did not link it to WT binding. Less common, S54H (S55H) was significantly enriched among high WT Env-binding BCRs in the BG505-only regimens (Corrected P = 8.7e-25, Fig.6d). S54H has been previously observed as a key residue in the human VRC01-class bnAb PCIN63–71I74.
T57V (T58V) in the HC was mutated in the majority of WT Env probe-binding sequences and exhibited some of the highest single position correlations with WT Env binding (Fig.6d). T57 is mutated, most commonly to a valine, in every known VRC01-class bnAb thus matching this correlation. Further, Chen et al. identified T57V as a mutation of high importance for HIV neutralization by VRC01-class bnAbs22. Our correlations conversely found T57I (T58I) had a negative association with BG505-WT binding (Fig.6c) which echoes its absence in any known VRC01-class bnAb. Significant correlations were observed for mutations at N100a (N105) for both BG505-only and 001428-containing immunization groups, N100aT and N100aD respectively (Fig.6d). This residue of the H-CDR3 can exhibit both main and side chain contacts with Env48,53. N100aD is observed in three human VRC01-class bnAbs, and N100aT appears in 12A12 (Extended Data Fig.7c)53,74. Overall, a number of known and important LC and HC VRC01-class mutations were observed and correlated with acquisition of WT Env binding, in addition to identification and interpretation of novel or lesser studied mutations. Thus, analyses of mutation frequencies and probe UMIs identified mutations relevant for VRC01-class B cell affinity maturation, including mutations previously validated in human VRC01 bnAb analyses.
Binding and neutralization of fully glycosylated Env viruses
To further validate the inferred WT binding of sequenced BCRs, a subset was selected for expression as mAbs. ~1,000 additional VDJs were added to the dataset from a smaller experiment. The now 9,351 gHL-VRC01 sequences were down selected to 25 mAbs. For down selection, clonal families were inferred using LCs and HCs with near-matching mutational patterns (Extended Data Fig.8a). Families with consistently high BG505-WT UMI counts were prioritized and a representative member was progressed. Sequences were next examined for unique complementary determining region (CDR) mutations, particularly in L-CDR1 (Fig.7a-c. Extended Data Fig.8b). The 25 expressed mAbs, notated as RPD01–25, included sequences from each immunization group (Extended Data Fig.9a).
Fig.7. HIV neutralization activity of BGC derived antibodies from 56 days after immunization.

a, Down selection criteria for 9,351 paired VRC01-VDJ sequences to 25 expressed mAbs.
b, Partial table of assay metrics for expressed mAbs denoting experiment group, GEM lane, BG505-WT probe UMI count, and VRC01-like HC mutations as well as the readouts of ELISA (EC50 μg/ml), SPR (KD Molar) and neutralization of pseudovirus (IC50 μg/ml).
c, Sequences of mAbs denoting only mutations from germline VRC01 BCR used.
See also Extended Data Fig.8 and 9.
21 of 25 expressed mAbs bound BG505-WT (ELISA, Extended Data Fig.9b). Two of the non-binding mAbs were from the prime-only animal group, consistent with the absence of BG505-WT-binding VRC01gHL B cells by flow cytometry from that group (Fig.4g, Extended Data Fig.5c). Affinity measurements determined that all mAbs bound BG505-WT with 2 × 10–5 to 4 ×10–7 KD, except for the sequences from the prime only animals, which had no binding (Fig.7b. Extended Data Fig.9c,f). No mAbs bound Env with CD4bs knock out mutations, confirming the binding modality was VRC01-type, as expected (Extended Data Fig.9d).
The 13 mAbs with the best WT Env binding were then evaluated for pseudovirus (PSV) neutralization on a CD4bs-sensitive panel of HIV viruses (Fig.7b,c). Aside from the 001428-N276Q HIV PSV, the six other PSV used were fully glycosylated, including at residue N276. BG505 and 191084 B7–19 are HIV clade A strains, while 001428 is clade C and 1HD2 clade B. All 13 mAbs efficiently neutralized 001428-N276Q PSV (Fig.7b). 11 of 13 mAbs neutralized 001428 WT PSV with an IC50 below 11 μg/mL with 8 mAbs neutralizing with an IC50 < 1 μg /ml. Three of the mAbs neutralized 001428 WT comparably to the potency of mature VRC01. Six of 13 mAbs neutralized BG505-WT PSV, the best of which neutralized BG505-WT with an IC50 of 1.1 μg/ml. Of the remaining viruses tested for neutralization, 1HD2 and 191084 B7–19 were neutralized by approximately half of the mAbs (Fig.7b). Thus, using rapid reimmunizations and only 8-weeks total vaccination time, VRC01-class precursor B cells evolved the ability to neutralize multiple HIV strains bearing the N276 glycan.
Sequences of the six mAbs that neutralized BG505-WT were compared (Fig.7c). All six mAbs possessed VRC01-class HC mutations Y33F, M34L/I, N53Y/T, S54R, T57V, K62N/Q and Y32H or H35N. These mutations are consistent with well-described requirements for H-CDR1 and H-CDR2 affinity maturation to bind and neutralize HIV by VRC01-class bnAbs 22,29,74. Each of these six mAbs also had multiple H-CDR3 mutations including Y100 (Y104) or N100a (N105). Overall, the HCs showed key mutations in H-CDR1 and H-CDR2 and showed that H-CDR3 could be mutated to enhance stabilization or BG505-WT binding.
L-CDR1 SHM is a critical component of VRC01-class bnAb development, with key mutations demonstrated to accommodate the N276 glycan that shields the Env CD4bs55. Multiple distinct L-CDR1 mutations were observed among the 6 mAbs that neutralized WT BG505, and the broader set of 11 mAbs that neutralized WT 001428 (Fig.7c). Those L-CDR1 mutations included instances of L-CDR1 single residue deletions (mAb RPD10D) and double residue deletions (RPD16E), as well as multiple different side-chain size reducing mutations, including a single G mutation (RDP07C) and double GG mutation (RPD08D). Nevertheless, mAbs RPD05C and RPD12D neutralized four of the WT viruses without a.a. deletions or glycine mutations in L-CDR1 (Fig.7b). Of note, both RPD05C and RPD12D shared all seven of the aforementioned H-CDR1 and H-CDR2 VRC01-class mutations as well as additional HC mutations that together confer substantial affinity gains over germline VRC01 (Fig.7c). Interestingly, RPD19E, which came from a large clonal family, maintained a near-germline LC and still neutralized BG505 virus (Extended Data Fig.9a). It appears that key HC mutations provided sufficient binding potency for moderate BG505-WT neutralization in the absence of LC affinity maturation, in line with outcomes from VRC01-class motif reversion and swapping experiments done for minVRC01 and PCIN6329,72.
Germline-reverted or mutation-swapped versions of RPD mAbs were tested for changes in affinity to Env (Extended Data Fig.10a-c). L-CDR1 reversion did not change affinities of high performing mAbs, except RPD20F, which did not possess H-CDR3 mutations. Reversion of the L-CDR1 showed RPD20F depends on it for affinity (Extended Data Fig.10a). AlphaFold3 modeling of RDF20F suggested L-CDR1 interactions between N31 and N32 and the N276 glycan base. Separately, reversion of H-CDR3 105D (N105) to germline was found to greatly reduced affinity to WT BG505 Env, but not 001428 (Extended Data Fig.10a,c). H-CDR3 loop modelling indicated that G95R (G99R) and N100aD (N105D) may result in an H-CDR3 loop conformational change, reorienting the Y104 residue of RPD20E differentially to BG505 versus 001428 Env (Extended Data Fig.10d). This intra-loop interaction could explain why full H-CDR3 reversion of RPD08 maintained more robust Env binding than N105D reversion (Extended Data Fig.10a). Overall, the observations of a necessity for L-CDR1 or H-CDR3 affinity maturation but not both for WT Env binding is consistent with prior VRC01-class bnAb findings29,55,74,76,77.
The most potent mAb identified post-vaccination, RPD08D, neutralized four WT viruses and had the lowest geometric mean IC50 (Extended Data Fig.9e). RPD08D possessed 18 a.a. mutations in total, with 7 a.a. mutations fulfilling previously defined VRC01-class bnAb mutation criteria, including two glycines in the L-CDR1 and canonical Y32H, Y33F, T57V, Q61H, and S54R mutations (Extended Data Fig.9a). Furthermore, the RPD08D H-CDR3 contained four mutations of which G95R (G99R), K96R (K100R), and N100aD (N105D) were highly correlated with increased BG505-WT binding in our sequence analysis when considering both regimen analyses (Fig.6d). RPD08D came from group D, which had been given a BG505-GT3.1 rapid boost followed by BG505-WT rapid boost (Fig.5a). Thus, transition from GT to WT Env binding occurred in these rapidly boosted germinal centers. Altogether, the mAbs with WT HIV Env neutralization activity possessed known VRC01-like mutations. These data demonstrate that neutralization of multiple tier-2 HIV strains can rapidly evolve within 56 days.
DISCUSSION
Here we overcome challenges of B cell GC recall by using rapid reimmunization of ongoing GCs. This strategy enhanced germline-targeted B cell responses to sequential regimens by leveraging repeated immunizations during primary GC progression. Following rapid reimmunization, the data indicate new antigens directly acted on BGC cells VRC01-cell numbers. Heterologous reimmunizations shifted VRC01-cell specificities and expanded VRC01-class populations in sustained GC reactions. Furthermore, on-target B-cells almost exclusively emerged from the existing BGC population. Refueled GCs durability enabled maturation of large affinity gains. Within just 56 days, thousands of VRC01-class B cells evolved BG505-WT binding, per mouse. This unprecedented abundance of cells contained extensive diversity of VDJ mutations allowing for differential analysis. Lastly, functional neutralization of multiple WT tier 2 HIV strains was demonstrated.
Antibody masking can block activation of B-cells targeting immunodominant epitopes39,40,42,68,78. Homologous boosting of VRC01-class B-cells at 6-weeks was highly susceptible to antibody masking, while early reimmunization was not. This was confirmed by IgG passive transfer experiments recapitulating 1-week and 6-week circulating antibody titers. When IgG transfers possessed significant specificities against the CD4bs, VRC01gHL recall responses were ablated. In contrast, low titers of off-target IgG, as seen at 1-week, enhanced the VRC01gHL cell numbers. Competitor endogenous B cell responses benefited most in the presence of high CD4bs IgG titers and less so when CD4bs IgG titers were absent. This result indicates VRC01 cells competed with endogenous cells for stimulatory signals. Those results were consistent with endogenous BGC response increases after 6-week reimmunization and not after 1-week rapid reimmunization. Overall, these findings indicate that rapid boosting with homologous antigen avoids antibody masking of desired epitopes on antigen, resulting in a variety of highly beneficial outcomes demonstrated in these experiments. Thus, rapid boosting occurs during optimal antibody conditions for promoting continued responses to the CD4bs.
Antibody feedback in the form of epitope masking imparts different effects on heterologous versus homologous antigen, due to intentional differences in epitopes42,79. Unlike homologous boosting, 1-week and 6-week heterologous boosting resulted in similar frequencies of antigen-binding VRC01-class BGC, consistent with minimal on-target epitope masking by antibodies. Furthermore, results demonstrate that heterologous regimens herein could be reduced to 1/3rd of the time with equivalent numbers of on-target VRC01 BGC cells generated.
Early in a GC response, low levels of antibodies enhance antigen immunogenicity by forming immune complexes (ICs) that deposit on complement receptors of follicular dendritic cells (FDCs)42,65. Evidence for this was seen in the 24-fold increase in VRC01gHL B cells following early versus late homologous reimmunization, as well as in the enhanced GC response when matching antibody titers to those found at 1-week. Notably, the strong response to heterologous antigen following reimmunization—compared to a mixed bolus prime—suggests that low-affinity antibodies may also improve retention of heterologous antigens. Given that all Env immunogens used share conserved epitopes outside the CD4 binding site, antigen IC capture could enhance both homologous and heterologous reimmunization. Together these data and current work in the field indicate that early antibody titers play a central role in driving the potency and efficacy of rapid reimmunization responses39,40,42,65,80.
A striking finding of this study was that heterologous sequential vaccines could be highly effective even if delivered before the target B-cell population had detectable affinity for the heterologous antigen (Fig.4d,e). BG505-WT Env antigen immunization resulted in large effects on target B-cells, even when delivered at d14 of the GC response (Fig.4g). Recent work established that an FDC network can display new antigens in the same GC without being saturated80. Once on FDCs, antigen immune complexes endure for many weeks protected from protease degradation80,81. A parsimonious interpretation of the observations in our study is that immune-complexed BG505-WT Env antigens were retained on FDCs, creating a reservoir available to existing BGC cells at future timepoints. These ‘refueled’ GCs have provided an antigenically mixed environment to the BGC cells, allowing for large affinity gaps to be bridged and the generation of BCRs capable of binding fully glycosylated HIV trimer.
Within 56 days, VRC01-class cells affinity matured to bind and neutralize WT HIV Env after using a 1-week rapid boost strategy (Fig.4g). The mutations identified in the WT binding VRC01-class BCRs were consistent with VRC01-class bnAb studies in mice and humans4–6,10,17,29,51,52,56,74. Thus, this model displayed biologically relevant, on-track affinity maturation consistent with human bnAb development and testing, but months faster than other mouse models—1/10th of the time needed for one seminal study22 —and years faster than observed in the context of human HIV infection.
In addition to rapidly evolving HIV neutralization by VRC01-class cells possessing previously seen VRC01-class mutations in humans and animal models, this strategy also provides new insights into the different mutational pressures in GCs created by related antigens (e.g., BG505 versus 001428), and the distinct contributions of H-CDR3 residues, such as N100aT/D. These further show the benefits of reimmunization of ongoing GCs for revealing new biology for vaccine enhancement.
This study has limitations. The experiments utilized the germline-reverted VRC01gHL knock-in BCR model. This allows for precise modeling of the precursor frequency found in humans, as well as the use of a germline-reverted sequence directly derived from a human bnAb. The BCR is assumed to have a mature H-CDR3, due to the inability to know H-CDR3 SHM post facto. Nonetheless, the affinity of this BCR for the BG505-GT3.1 is within the range of observed affinities for activated precursors in a recent human clinical trial23. Moreover, this model has been used to inform priming requirements that successfully predicted the clinical trial results of first germline targeting trial in humans57. Thus, we believe it to be a highly relevant model, proven to be informative for human clinical trials. Additionally, Env trimer is used as a representative viral glycoprotein. Immunizations included here were not designed to progress B cells through complete bnAb development, nor to incur the breadth of a bona fide bnAb. Nonetheless B cells evolved the ability to neutralize WT Envs from multiple clades of HIV. Future work should study later immunization comprised of diverse WT Env trimers, with the goal of improving the breadth of this response.
Together this data indicates the power of 1-week reimmunized, extended GC reactions to diversify and refuel VRC01-class cells covering large antigenic distances and generating VRC01-class B cells that can rapidly develop neutralizing activity. These findings expand our understanding of GC biology and point to translatable strategies for enhancing vaccines.
METHODS
Protein expression and purification
Immunogens used in this study were generated as in Lee et. al. 202251. Trimers used the MD39 SOSIP backbone to achieve stabilized closed confirmations. Sequences originated from the BG505 strain or 001428–2.42 strains as noted25. CD4 binding site knock out trimers were generated using the G473T mutation81. Trimers were transiently transfected into HEK-293F cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific: R79007) using polyethylenimine. Cells were harvested after 7 days and supernatant was purified by Galanthus nivalis lectin or 2G12 antibody affinity chromatography. Trimers were polished by SEC on Superdex 200 16/600 size column (Cytvia: 28–9893-35). Molecular weight and homogeneity were confirmed by size-exclusion chromatography-multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (Cytiva) operating with an isocratic flow of 0.5 mL/minute followed by DAWN HELEOS II and Optilab T-rEX detectors (Wyatt Technology).
His-Avi-tagged eOD-GT5 monomer and His-Avi-tagged trimers were used for FCM probe and ELISA assays. They were produced using transient transfection of HEK-293F cells and purified as previously described using immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography followed by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)25. Molecular weight and homogeneity were confirmed by SEC-MALS. Antigens were biotinylated with BirA (Avidity) and re-purified via SEC to remove excess biotin.
Monoclonal antibodies were made by GenScript. Amino acid sequences for LC and HC were codon optimized and inserted into plasmids by GenScript. TurboCHO-HT 2.0 pipeline was used where plasmids are transiently transfected into CHO-S cell lines in 10mls and then supernatant is purified with Protein A Sepharose Fast Flow resin (Cytiva). CE-SDS and SEC-HPLC were used for quality control. Proteins were frozen at −80 in elution buffer (NaAC Buffer,0.2 M L-Arginine,pH5.5) or exchanged into PBS via Zeba 40k MWCO columns (ThermoSci: A57763) for pseudovirus (PSV) neutralization assays.
Mice and Immunizations
Mouse experiments took place at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI). Mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions in a temperature-controlled (69–75 °F) and humidity-controlled (30–70%) ventilated facility with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle, with ad libitum access to food and water. Experiments and procedures were approved by the IACUC committee of LJI (IACUC protocol AP00001129). Experiments used age and sex-matched mice between 6–12 weeks of age. Both males and females were used. C57BL/6-J, B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb /BoyJ (B6.CD45.1) and CByJ.B6-Tg(UBC-GFP)30Scha H2b/J (B6.GFP) mice from Jackson Laboratory were used in this study (JAX: 000664, 002014, 004353). VRC01-gH/VRC01-gL mice were kept homozygous in B6.GFP or B6.CD45.1 backgrounds. After one backcross, heterozygous VRC01-gH/VRC01-gL (VRC01gHL) were used as all donors for experiments.
For transgenic B cell transfers, one VRC01gHL heterozygous mouse and one B6 mouse were euthanized via CO2 chamber and spleens were collected. Spleens were mashed and resuspended in 2mls of RPMI with 10% FBS (R10). AKT lysis was performed, cells were filtered through 45uM, and returned to R10. Mouse B cell isolation (StemCell EasySep: Cat. 19854) was done on 700ul of the VRC01-gHL heterozygous spleen following manufacturer’s instructions except for maintaining reaction on ice and in R10. After isolation VRC01gHL B cells were stained with an abbreviated FCM panel to verify CD45.1+/CD45.2–/B220+/CD4–; this panel included an eOD-GT5 60mer with non-specific AF647 labeling to denote all VRC01gHL-BCR containing cells (Kato et. al., 2020). Purified cells were >95% live via MUSE cell counter and additionally hand counted for verification. VRC01gHL cell concentrations were adjusted based on eOD-GT5 60mer staining, normally 35–45% of isolated B cells carried the correct VRC01gHL BCR. Exactly 1000 VRC01gHL BRC+ cells per 200ul injection of RPMI were given per mouse. To increase cell concentrations and cell viability of transfers, we included 500,000 “buffer” splenocytes from B6 spleens57,59. Cells were transferred via retro orbital injections one day prior to priming immunizations.
Mice were primed subcutaneously, bilaterally, at the tail base with 10μg BG505-GT3.1 or other Env protein and 5U ISCOM adjuvant total. General anesthesia was used and tail-base was shaved before immunization. Unless stated reimmunizations contained 10μg protein and 5U ISCOM. After reimmunizations (d+1 through d+28) draining iLNs and spleens were resected. For serum kinetics blood was collected from submandibular vein puncture.
Soluble immune stimulating complex (ISCOM)-like saponin nanoparticle adjuvant (ISCOMs) was used for all immunizations. ISCOMs is a self-assembling nanoparticle containing cholesterol phospholipids, and quillaja saponin. It was prepared as previously described59,63. 0.2μg cholesterol and 1μg saponin constitute 1 Unit ISCOMs. ISCOMs is soluble in PBS and does not interact with protein antigens. 10 Units of ICOMs was used per mouse, mixed in PBS with antigen before immunization.
Complement depletion with cobra venom factor (CVF, Complement Technology Inc.: Cat. A150) was performed on two consecutive days with administration of 20ug CVF in 200ul PBS, given intra peritoneally split bilaterally. C3 ELISA (Abcam: Cat. Ab263884) was used to confirm depletion of complement in serum.
IgG purification and transfer
Blood was collected via external cardiac puncture. After clotting for 30+ minutes and centrifugation at >6,000 rpm serum was collected and re-spun for purity. Serum was frozen at −30C until use. For IgG purification Thermo Nab SpinKit Protein A Columns were used (ThermoSci: 89979) followed by concentration in Amicon Ultra-4 4ml Filters 50k MWCO (Millipore: UFC805024) and finally protein was buffer exchanged into PBS with Zeba 40k MWCO columns (ThermoSci: A57763). For transfer, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100ul in PBS bilaterally one day before immunization.
Flow Cytometry
Inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) and spleens were resected from mice and mashed through a 70μm filter into R10 supplemented with 0.1ul/ml benzonase (MinneBio: MBPN01–50KU). Spleens were processed with AKT lysis (Gibco: A10492–01). ~1/10th of iLN or 1/50th spleens were plated for staining in round bottom plates (1–3 million cells). Staining buffer was 3% FBS, 1mM EDTA in PBS (Corning: 2104CV). Staining proceeded with pre-stain blocking, probe stain, and antibody master mix added sequentially in intervals of 15 min, 30 min, 45min. See Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 for details. After staining, cells were washed and 30ul of sphero count beads at predetermined concentrations were added (BDBiosciences: 556296). Cells were collected in staining buffer on a Cytek Aruora 5L instrument.
B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing and analysis
Cells prepared as normal for FCM, with the exchange of SA-BV421 for SA-BV421-biolegend-DNA-oligo (Biolegend: Custom TotalSeqTM-C). Using a Becton, Dickinson and Company S6, cells were sorted for Singlets/Live/B220+/GL7+/CD38lo/IgD– /CD45.1+/CD45.2– into chilled FBS. Cells were then loaded onto a Chromium chip and controller (10X Genomics) following manufacturer’s protocol. V(D)J and Feature hashtag libraries with indexes were prepared following the 10X Genomics protocol for Single Cell 5’ Reagent Kits v2 (Dual Index). Sequencing was performed on NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina). Cell Ranger v7.1 (10X Genomics) was used for demultiplexing and FASTQ generation. VDJ reads were aligned de novo using cell ranger and counts was used for feature oligo counts. All QC metrics were left as in programs. IgBlast was run with the Immcantation Framework™ using a custom reference genome of mouse with additional VRC01 gHL sequences included51 . AIRR frames of all sequences as database were generated from Immcantation. Python was used to convert oligo-probe counts to barcoded dataframe51 . Cell barcodes were used to join dataframes in R studio. Light chain and heavy chain dataframes with correct IgH and IgK calls for VRC01 were joined and translateDNA (Immcantation) was used to translate to amino acid sequence. Excel database was used to extract amino acid position, compare to germline, and count mutations. Jupyter Notebooks and Python were used to plot ggplot logos, 2D histograms, extract mutation matrices, run correlation analyses (see Statistical Analysis Methods) and to make volcano plots of correlations.
A VRC01 scoring algorithm was used to grade each complete VDJ sequence. Conventionally, counting of heavy chain residues to those matching positions in six representative VRC01-like bnAbs generated the “VRC01-class HC score” in Fig.6, and a more refined HC key residue count and LC key residue score were used in Extended Data Fig. 5 as published previously25,26.
Analyses included at times VDJ sequences extracted from live and frozen experiments combined. Following successful thawing of pooled iLN cells from immunized mice, cells were stained and sequenced identical to fresh samples. These sequences within their groups (C and E) and are denoted as coming from GEM numbers 01 and 02.
Enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA)
BG505-GT3.1 Env was used to assay total IgG against Env and eOD-GT5 monomer was used to readout IgG reactivity for the CD4bs of Env. Corning half area plates (Corning: 3690) were coated overnight with 2.5 μg/mL streptavidin (Biolegend: 280302). Plates were washed (5x in PBS with 0.05% v/v/ Tween20). Plates were incubated in 2.5μg/mL Env-biotin trimer or 0.42 μg /ml eOD-biotin monomer (molar equivalents). For mAb analysis 2 μg/mL streptavidin and 2 μg/mL Env-biotin was used. Plates were washed again, blocked with 3% BSA solution, and serum samples in 1% BSA were added to wells. All incubations were 1hr and followed by washing. Secondary detection used 1:2,000 dilution of anti-mouse HRP (Jackson: 115–035-166) in 1% BSA. After final washes 30 μL of TMB substrate (ThermoSci: 34021) and 30 μL sulfuric acid was used to quench reaction. Plates were read at 450nm and EC50 was calculated using top constrained to plate maximum for standard sample and bottom constrained to highest blank well.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Affinity and kinetics measurements were performed using a ProteOn XPR36 biosensor (Bio-Rad) with HC30M sensor chips (XanTec) and HBS-EP+ buffer (pH 7.4, Teknova) supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA. about 6000 RUs of Goat Anti-Mouse IgG Fc (SouthernBiotech 1013–01) were immobilized via EDC/NHS coupling, and IgG ligands were captured at 0.3 µg/ml (100–200 RUs/channel). Antigens were injected at 30 µl/min for 180 s, followed by 300 s dissociation. Surfaces were regenerated with 1.7% phosphoric acid (3 × 60 s). Data were processed in ProteOn Manager (Bio-Rad) with interspot and double referencing, and binding analyzed using a 1:1 Langmuir model.
Neutralization assay
Pseudoneutralization analysis was performed exactly as stated in Cottrell et al. 2024. On a similar but abbreviated N276-glycosylated Envpanel. Briefly, pseudoviruses were produced by co-transfecting HEK293T cells with Env-expressing plasmids and an Env-deficient HIV-1 backbone (pSG3ΔEnv) using Fugene 6 or PEI MAX. Virus-containing supernatants were harvested at 72 hours and stored at –80°C. On the day of the assay, serially diluted mAbs were incubated with pseudovirus (pre-treated with DEAE-dextran) for 1 hour at 37°C before being added to pre-plated TZM-bl cells. After 72 hours of incubation, luminescence was measured following cell lysis and substrate addition. IC50 values were calculated using nonlinear regression in GraphPad Prism. All cells were maintained in D10 medium under standard conditions.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 10. Where all groups had over eight data points one-way ANOVA tests assuming Gaussian distribution and unequal standard deviations (using Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA tests) with Dunnett T3 multiple comparison correction was used. In other cases, when any groups compared had fewer than eight points, Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric uncorrected tests were used. P-values are NS > 0.05, * <0.05 ,** <0.01, *** <0.001, **** <0.0001.
For VDJ mutation statistics, aligned and gapped sequences were filtered for complete only, then joined to one aa string. In Jupyter Notebooks, Python (version 3.9.2) with pandas, NumPy, SciPy, and statsmodels packages were used to analyze mutation-phenotype relationships. For each mutation identified relative to the VRC01 germline sequence, statistical associations with BG505-WT-probe UMI hashtag output counts were evaluated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to assess monotonic relationships between mutation presence and output values. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare output distributions between sequences with and without each mutation. Multiple testing correction was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure to control for false positives across all tested mutations. Mutations were considered statistically significant when both FDR-corrected Spearman and Mann-Whitney p-values were <0.05 and occurred in >1% of sequences.
For group-level comparisons of mutations aquired, two-sided Chi-squared tests with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction were performed to assess associations between mutation presence and group membership. Effect sizes were quantified using Cliff's Delta, a non-parametric measure ranging from −1 to +1, where negative values indicate the mutation is depleted in the group of interest, positive values indicate enrichment, and 0 indicates no systematic difference
Extended Data
Extended Data Fig 1. Homologous reimmunization across days 6–12 post prime.

a, Experiment schematic. d = day. d+ = days post reimmunization. Adj. is ISCOM adjuvant, 5U. Protein is BG505-GT3.1 Env, 10μg. b, Representative flow cytometry gating. Blue gates are congenic marker-denoting VRC01gHL Cells
c-e, Total c, BGC d, Plasma cells e, VRC01gHL BGC cells in inguinal lymph node (iLN).
f, Percent VRC01gHL of c.
g, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells (as in e) but in spleen.
h, Total CD4 T cells in iLN.
Means and SD are represented as bars. Unboosted, Adjuvant or Mixed groups were compiled from two repeated experiments, giving n=10,9,10 respectively for either boost-immunization window. Protein only group was tested once, n=3 for either window.
Means as bars and SDs plotted. Right-most groups of each plot tested with Lognormal Welch’s t-Test, no significance found, not shown. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected tests shown; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P< 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
Extended data Fig.2. BGC population specificities after short and long immunization intervals.

a, Env trimers used in experiments aligned to HxB2. KD of germline (gl) and mature (m) VRC01 mAb (monovalent) for Env trimers in nM.
b, Full gating for Figure 1. Representative sample from heterologous 1-week reimmunization. a-e, same experiments as in Figure 1. w = week. Data from two replicates (n = 7 and 5).
c, Total CD4+ T cells in iLN.
d, Percent VRC01gHL of all BGC cells in iLN. c,d, Data are pooled from two independent experiments (n = 5 and n = 7 mice per group). See also Fig. 1.
e, Total BG505-GT3.1 probe positive VRC01gHL BGC cells in iLN.
f, Total BG505-GT3.1 probe positive endogenous (CD45.2+) BGC cells in iLN. e,f, One biological replicate performed, n=5 for 1w and n=7 for 6w boost groups.
g, Experiment schematic of rapid boosting (h-l) groups performed with or without ISCOM adjuvant. n=4 mice for BG505-GT3.1 boosts and n=3 for all other groups.
h, Total BGC cells. i, Total endogenous BGC cells binding 001428-N276Q probe. j, Total VRC01gHL BGC cells. k, percent of all VRC01gHL BGC cells binding 001428-N276Q probe.
Bars indicate mean (or geometric mean) ± s.d. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test; NS, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Extended Data Fig.3. Prime resembles 2nd immunization returns when antibody titers are matched.

a, Schematic of generation of IgG for transfers in Fig.3c,d.
b-i, as in Fig.3i-l cell counts and percentages from two transfer conditions of IgG, 9 days after priming immunization. Purified total IgG transfers amounts designate groups, None, Low (10–40μg), or High (100–200μg). Experiments using IgG without VRC01gHL cells (pink): unrepeated. Experiments using VRC01gHL in primed animal (blue): experimental repeat not presented. For all plots groups: None (n=4), Low (n=12), High (n=8).
j, Schematic of experiment where cobra venom factor (CVF) treatment was combined with IgG transfer used in
f-g “Low” group.
k, Total and I, percent probe positive BGC cells in d8 primed mice. Two experiments repeated, n=5.
For all plots means or geometric means and SD plotted. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected Dunn's test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P< 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. For Fig.2.
Extended Data Fig.4. Elicitation of BG505-WT binders through rapid immunization and long GCs.

a, Experiment schematic. Two repeats were compiled. Mice per group varied.
b, BGC cells in iLNs.
c, Percent of VRC01gHL BGC cells that are BG505-WT probe binding.
d, Representative plots from each group of endogenous BGC stained with BG505-WT probe. Percent of GC and total endogenous (CD45.2+) BGC cells positive for BG505-WT probe.
e, Representative flow plots of two alternate probe panels run for 7 week animals. Endogenous and VRC01gHL BGC cells from same animal stained with either 001428-WT and 001428-CD4bs.KO or 001428-WT alone.
a-e, All groups contain mice from both of two experimental repeats. Final n= 8,7,9,10 left to right for groups plotted.
f, Schematic of additional group analyzed at 7 weeks. Plotted with same data in Figure 4.f, group X has all three immunogens delivered cotemporally resulting in 30 μg protein and 2x dose ISCOM. Analyzed alongside groups described in in Figure 4a, e.
g-j, Experiment described in Figure 4f-h.
g, Total BGC cells at week 8 in iLNs.
h,Total endogenous (CD45.2+) BGC cells that are BG505-WT probe positive with LOD as brown dotted line at 50 cells/animal.
i, Total VRC01 BGC cells.
j, Percent of VRC01gHL BGC cells that are BG505-WT probe binding.
g-j, Table denotes immunization weeks and contents. All immunizations included adjuvant. Immunizations match previous amounts with the exception: where (2x) or two antigens are listed final amounts of antigen and adjuvant are doubled and mice were given final immunizations at week 6 with analysis at week 7. Multiple experiments were compiled, and not all experiments included all groups. Compiled experiments include groups from Figure 5a (diamonds) and Figure 4a.
Means and SD are represented as bars. Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P< 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. For Figure.4.
Extended Data Fig.5. VRC01gHL BGC cells from reimmunization comparisons and VDJ sequencing.

a, Additional control groups for Fig.5a, providing 4 weeks maturation after final boost, giving 11 weeks total.
b, Left to right: Total BGC. Total BG505-WT binding VRC01gHL BGC cells. Total BG505-WT binding endogenous BGC cells.
a-b, Experiment was performed once. 8 week groups n=5; 11 week groups n = 4,3,3 respectively from left to right. Geometric means with SD plotted and Kruskal-Wallis uncorrected test; not significant (NS), P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P< 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
c, BG505-WT probe staining and gates for all VRC01gHL BGC cells after 8 weeks, representing all animals sorted for VRC01gHL VDJ sequencing.
Extended Data Fig.6. VDJ sequences from all groups display different mutational patterns.

a, ggSeqLogos for light chain (top) and heavy chain (bottom) for all groups Fig. 5a. VDJ sequences were aligned, and germline residues are masked in white, all residue mutations are depicted as a single letter scaled to their frequency in that group's VDJs. Groups and sequences (n) are depicted in table to left.
b, Mutations from germline differing between groups where P value is Chi2 adjusted P value and positive or negative effect value for 1428 groups. Displayed top ~10% of total significant mutations found (P < 10–30).
c, Table of first LC codons occurrence in each group. Codons with a nucleotide substitution in positions 1 or 2 are translated as “X” deletions in alignments, but codon table shows their true residue translation (aa column).
Extended Data Fig.7. Mutations correlating with higher probe-oligo-barcode acquisition across regimen types.

a, Correlations of GEM averages (Fig. 5.d) for mutation count, VRC01 score, or WT-probe UMI. Pearson correlation (two-sided); r and P values shown.
b, Masked ggseq logos of VDJs separated by LC and HC and then by regimen where probe = 0 (top rows) or probe > 4 or 5 (bottom rows).
c,d, Most significant mutations (P < 10–10) from germline correlating with BG505-WT probe UMI counts. Grouped by Env scaffolds (BG505 or mixed) used in regimen and by antibody chain. Spearman correlation coefficients and FDR-corrected p-values shown (two-sided tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). Only mutations with FDR p < 0.05 (both Spearman and Mann-Whitney tests) and frequency >1% are considered with the top ~10% plotted. See also Data Fig. 6c,d.
Extended Data Fig.8. VDJ sequences for monoclonal antibody expression.

a, Four example monoclonal VDJs- inferred clonal families shown as masked VDJ LC and HC sequences.
b, 25 monoclonal panel, masked sequence VDJs expressed from various groups with germline VRC01 (gVRC01) and mature VRC01 (mVRC01) depicted as well.
Extended Data Fig.9. Monoclonal antibody assays.

a, Full data table of all monoclonal antibodies produced with metadata, ELISA, SPR, and neutralization.
b, EC50 for ELISAs against WT Env where each mAb is colored according to immunization group. n=25 mAbs tested across three plates and each plate controls with mVRC01 (black).
c, SPR tested KD for n=24 mAbs as well as glVRC01 plotted as black circle and mVRC01 as triangles. Geometric mean plotted.
d, mAb ELISA curves for plates coated with Env-biotin with CD4bs sequence knocked out. RM19R is primate monoclonal base-binder.
e, Neutralization IC50's for 11 mAbs with the ability to neutralize WT virus. Geometric mean and +/− SD are plotted. Each group is one mAb repeated tests for each of four viruses.
Extended Data Fig.10. mAb reversion and exchange mutations.

a, Log of EC50 ratio between original RPD mAb and mutant. Antibody name “(RPD)08D” and _gl_ or _m_ denote respectively if germline or mature mutations were exchanged. If limit of detection not met and binding did not reach an EC50 the highest Abs tested was used. For these instances when an EC50 was not reached, binding curves were plotted in b and c.
b,c, Binding curves of mAbs (closed diamonds) and mutated-mAbs (open diamonds) against 001428-WT or BG505-WT. Curves of matching shades were run within the same plate.
d, Heavy chain CDR3 loop conformations of mVRC01 and RPD19E predicted by AlphaFold3 against BG505-WT or 001428-WT gp120 electrostatic colored surface. Yellow circle is predicted interaction site of RPD19E-Y104 with BG505-WT gp120.
Supplementary Material
Tables
Supplementary Information
Haupt_Table_mAb_SPR.csv
Acknowledgements
We thank Zbigniew Mikulski, Sara McArdle, and Simon Goldstein of the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) Microscopy Core Facility for Orion imaging.
Funding
This work was funded by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) R33 AI161297 and UM1 AI144462–07; Gates Foundation funding (WRS); support by LJI & Kyowa Kirin, Inc. (KKNA-Kyowa Kirin North America)(SC); ARCS fellowship, San Diego chapter (SH); and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)(DJI).
Footnotes
Competing interests
D.J.I and S.C. are inventors on a patent related to SMNP adjuvant (US11,547,672). W.R.S. is an inventor on patent applications related to immunogens in this manuscript filed by The Scripps Research Institute and IAVI. W.R.S is an employee and shareholder of Moderna, Inc. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
Sequencing data has been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE309127 and is publicly available in SRA (PRJNA1334009).
Code Availability
All analyses were performed using publicly available software as described in the Methods. Further information is available from the corresponding author upon request.
REFERENCES
- 1.Global HIV & AIDS Statistics—Fact Sheet. UNAIDS (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pegu A et al. A Meta-analysis of Passive Immunization Studies Shows that Serum-Neutralizing Antibody Titer Associates with Protection against SHIV Challenge. Cell Host Microbe 26, 336–346.e3 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Corey L et al. Two Randomized Trials of Neutralizing Antibodies to Prevent HIV-1 Acquisition. New Engl J Med 384, 1003–1014 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burton DR & Hangartner L Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies to HIV and Their Role in Vaccine Design. Annu Rev Immunol 34, 635–659 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sok D & Burton DR Recent progress in broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV. Nat Immunol 19, 1179–1188 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwong PD & Mascola JR HIV-1 Vaccines Based on Antibody Identification, B Cell Ontogeny, and Epitope Structure. Immunity 48, 855–871 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Haynes BF, Burton DR & Mascola JR Multiple roles for HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies. Sci. Transl. Med 11, eaaz2686 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee JH & Crotty S HIV vaccinology: 2021 update. Semin Immunol 51, 101470 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Govindan R & Stephenson KE HIV Vaccine Development at a Crossroads: New B and T Cell Approaches. Vaccines 12, 1043 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haynes BF & Burton DR Developing an HIV vaccine. Science 355, 1129–1130 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jardine JG et al. HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody precursor B cells revealed by germline-targeting immunogen. Science 351, 1458–1463 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Havenar-Daughton C et al. The human naive B cell repertoire contains distinct subclasses for a germline-targeting HIV-1 vaccine immunogen. Sci Transl Med 10, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steichen JM et al. A generalized HIV vaccine design strategy for priming of broadly neutralizing antibody responses. Science 366, eaax4380 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee JH et al. Vaccine genetics of IGHV1–2 VRC01-class broadly neutralizing antibody precursor naïve human B cells. Npj Vaccines 6, 113 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jardine J et al. Rational HIV Immunogen Design to Target Specific Germline B Cell Receptors. Science 340, 711–716 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McGuire AT et al. Engineering HIV envelope protein to activate germline B cell receptors of broadly neutralizing anti-CD4 binding site antibodies. J Exp Med 210, 655–663 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Briney B et al. Tailored Immunogens Direct Affinity Maturation toward HIV Neutralizing Antibodies. Cell 166, 1459–1470.e11 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Steichen JM et al. HIV Vaccine Design to Target Germline Precursors of Glycan-Dependent Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies. Immunity 45, 483–496 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Escolano A et al. Sequential Immunization Elicits Broadly Neutralizing Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies in Ig Knockin Mice. Cell 166, 1445–1458.e12 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Medina-Ramírez M et al. Design and crystal structure of a native-like HIV-1 envelope trimer that engages multiple broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in vivo. J Exp Med 214, 2573–2590 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Willis JR et al. Human immunoglobulin repertoire analysis guides design of vaccine priming immunogens targeting HIV V2-apex broadly neutralizing antibody precursors. Immunity (2022) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen X et al. Vaccination induces maturation in a mouse model of diverse unmutated VRC01-class precursors to HIV-neutralizing antibodies with >50% breadth. Immunity 54, 324–339.e8 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leggat DJ et al. Vaccination induces HIV broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in humans. Science 378, eadd6502 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Steichen JM et al. Vaccine priming of rare HIV broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in nonhuman primates. Science 384, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cottrell CA et al. Heterologous prime-boost vaccination drives early maturation of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in humanized mice. Sci. Transl. Med (2024) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adn0223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Willis JR et al. Vaccination with mRNA-encoded nanoparticles drives early maturation of HIV bnAb precursors in humans. Science 389, eadr8382 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Caniels TG et al. Precise targeting of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in humans. Science (2025) doi: 10.1126/science.adv5572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin X et al. Structural insights into VRC01-class bnAb precursors with diverse light chains elicited in the IAVI G001 human vaccine trial. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am 122, e2510163122 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jardine JG et al. Minimally Mutated HIV-1 Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies to Guide Reductionist Vaccine Design. Plos Pathog 12, e1005815 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abbott RK & Crotty S Factors in B cell competition and immunodominance. Immunol Rev (2020) doi: 10.1111/imr.12861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burton DR et al. A Blueprint for HIV Vaccine Discovery. Cell Host Microbe 12, 396–407 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Havenar‐Daughton C, Lee JH & Crotty S Tfh cells and HIV bnAbs, an immunodominance model of the HIV neutralizing antibody generation problem. Immunol Rev 275, 49–61 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sanders RW & Moore JP Progress on priming HIV-1 immunity. Science 384, 738–739 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Victora GD & Mouquet H What Are the Primary Limitations in B-Cell Affinity Maturation, and How Much Affinity Maturation Can We Drive with Vaccination?: Lessons from the Antibody Response to HIV-1. Csh Perspect Biol 10, a029389 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stamper CT & Wilson PC What Are the Primary Limitations in B-Cell Affinity Maturation, and How Much Affinity Maturation Can We Drive with Vaccination?: Is Affinity Maturation a Self-Defeating Process for Eliciting Broad Protection? Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 10, a028803 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kelsoe G & Haynes BF What Are the Primary Limitations in B-Cell Affinity Maturation, and How Much Affinity Maturation Can We Drive with Vaccination? Breaking through Immunity’s Glass Ceiling. Csh Perspect Biol 10, a029397 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xie Z et al. mRNA-LNP HIV-1 trimer boosters elicit precursors to broad neutralizing antibodies. Science 384, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y et al. Germinal center B cells govern their own fate via antibody feedback. J Exp Med 210, 457–464 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tas JMJ et al. Antibodies from primary humoral responses modulate recruitment of naive B cells during secondary responses. Immunity 55, 1856–1871.e6 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dvorscek AR et al. Conversion of vaccines from low to high immunogenicity by antibodies with epitope complementarity. Immunity (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schiepers A, van’t Wout MFL, Hobbs A, Mesin L & Victora GD Opposing effects of pre-existing antibody and memory T cell help on the dynamics of recall germinal centers. Immunity (2024) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cyster JG & Wilson PC Antibody modulation of B cell responses—Incorporating positive and negative feedback. Immunity 57, 1466–1481 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mesin L et al. Restricted Clonality and Limited Germinal Center Reentry Characterize Memory B Cell Reactivation by Boosting. Cell 180, 92–106.e11 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kuraoka M et al. Recall of B cell memory depends on relative locations of prime and boost immunization. Sci Immunol 7, eabn5311 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shlomchik MJ Do Memory B Cells Form Secondary Germinal Centers? Yes and No. Csh Perspect Biol 10, a029405 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McHeyzer-Williams LJ, Dufaud C & McHeyzer-Williams MG Do Memory B Cells Form Secondary Germinal Centers? Impact of Antibody Class and Quality of Memory T-Cell Help at Recall. Csh Perspect Biol 10, a028878 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pape KA & Jenkins MK Do Memory B Cells Form Secondary Germinal Centers?: It Depends. Csh Perspect Biol 10, a029116 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhou T et al. Structural Basis for Broad and Potent Neutralization of HIV-1 by Antibody VRC01. Science 329, 811–817 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wu X et al. Rational Design of Envelope Identifies Broadly Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibodies to HIV-1. Science 329, 856–861 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tian M et al. Induction of HIV Neutralizing Antibody Lineages in Mice with Diverse Precursor Repertoires. Cell 166, 1471–1484.e18 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lee JH et al. Highly mutated antibodies capable of neutralizing N276 glycan-deficient HIV after a single immunization with an Env trimer. Cell Reports 38, 110485 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Caniels TG et al. Germline-targeting HIV-1 Env vaccination induces VRC01-class antibodies with rare insertions. Cell Rep. Med 4, 101003 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Scheid JF et al. Sequence and Structural Convergence of Broad and Potent HIV Antibodies That Mimic CD4 Binding. Science 333, 1633–1637 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.West AP, Diskin R, Nussenzweig MC & Bjorkman PJ Structural basis for germ-line gene usage of a potent class of antibodies targeting the CD4-binding site of HIV-1 gp120. Proc National Acad Sci 109, E2083–E2090 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou T et al. Multidonor Analysis Reveals Structural Elements, Genetic Determinants, and Maturation Pathway for HIV-1 Neutralization by VRC01-Class Antibodies. Immunity 39, 245–258 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jardine JG et al. Priming a broadly neutralizing antibody response to HIV-1 using a germline-targeting immunogen. Science 349, 156–161 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Abbott RK et al. Precursor Frequency and Affinity Determine B Cell Competitive Fitness in Germinal Centers, Tested with Germline-Targeting HIV Vaccine Immunogens. Immunity 48, 133–146.e6 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moyer TJ et al. Engineered immunogen binding to alum adjuvant enhances humoral immunity. Nat Med 26, 430–440 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kato Y et al. Multifaceted Effects of Antigen Valency on B Cell Response Composition and Differentiation In Vivo. Immunity (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee JH et al. Modulating the quantity of HIV Env-specific CD4 T cell help promotes rare B cell responses in germinal centers. J Exp Med 218, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Silva M et al. A particulate saponin/TLR agonist vaccine adjuvant alters lymph flow and modulates adaptive immunity. Sci Immunol 6, eabf1152 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Weidner NG et al. Antigen avidity drives the durability of the vaccine immune response. bioRxiv 2025.04.18.649567 (2025) doi: 10.1101/2025.04.18.649567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cirelli KM et al. Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance. Cell 177, 1153–1171.e28 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee JH et al. Long-primed germinal centres with enduring affinity maturation and clonal migration. Nature 1–7 (2022) doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05216-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bhagchandani SH et al. Two-dose priming immunization amplifies humoral immunity by synchronizing vaccine delivery with the germinal center response. Sci. Immunol 9, eadl3755 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tam HH et al. Sustained antigen availability during germinal center initiation enhances antibody responses to vaccination. Proc National Acad Sci 113, E6639–E6648 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hu JK et al. Murine Antibody Responses to Cleaved Soluble HIV-1 Envelope Trimers Are Highly Restricted in Specificity. J Virol 89, 10383–10398 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Madden PJ et al. Diverse priming outcomes under conditions of very rare precursor B cells. Immunity 58, 997–1014.e11 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cirelli KM et al. Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance. Cell 180, 206 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Martin JT et al. Targeting HIV Env immunogens to B cell follicles in nonhuman primates through immune complex or protein nanoparticle formulations. Npj Vaccines 5, 72 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ramezani-Rad1 P et al. Vaccination with mRNA-encoded membrane-bound HIV Envelope trimer induces neutralizing antibodies in animal models. Science Translational Medicine (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Parks KR et al. Vaccination with mRNA-encoded membrane-anchored HIV envelope trimers elicited tier 2 neutralizing antibodies in a phase 1 clinical trial. Sci. Transl. Med 17, eady6831 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Setliff I et al. High-Throughput Mapping of B Cell Receptor Sequences to Antigen Specificity. Cell 179, 1636–1646.e15 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Umotoy J et al. Rapid and Focused Maturation of a VRC01-Class HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Lineage Involves Both Binding and Accommodation of the N276- Glycan. Immunity 51, 141–154.e6 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Dam K-MA et al. Mapping essential somatic hypermutations in a CD4-binding site bNAb informs HIV-1 vaccine design. Cell Rep. 44, 115713 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cottrell CA et al. Structural basis of glycan276-dependent recognition by HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies. Cell Rep. 37, 109922 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhou T et al. Structural Repertoire of HIV-1-Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the CD4 Supersite in 14 Donors. Cell 161, 1280–1292 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.McNamara HA et al. Antibody Feedback Limits the Expansion of B Cell Responses to Malaria Vaccination but Drives Diversification of the Humoral Response. Cell Host Microbe (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schiepers A et al. Molecular fate-mapping of serum antibody responses to repeat immunization. Nature 615, 1–3 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Martínez-Riaño A et al. Long-term retention of antigens in germinal centers is controlled by the spatial organization of the follicular dendritic cell network. Nat. Immunol 24, 1–14 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Aung A et al. Low protease activity in B cell follicles promotes retention of intact antigens after immunization. Science 379, eabn8934 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kulp DW et al. Structure-based design of native-like HIV-1 envelope trimers to silence non-neutralizing epitopes and eliminate CD4 binding. Nat Commun 8, 1655 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing data has been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE309127 and is publicly available in SRA (PRJNA1334009).
