Abstract
Arteries and arterioles constrict in response to intraluminal pressure to generate myogenic tone, but the molecular nature of the vascular force-sensing mechanism is not fully characterized. Here, we investigated the role of angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) on vascular smooth muscle cells in the development of myogenic tone in cerebral parenchymal arterioles from mice. We found that pretreatment with the AT1R blocker losartan inhibited the development of myogenic tone in these vessels but did not alter the luminal diameter of arterioles with preestablished tone. Rodents express two AT1R isotypes: AT1Ra and AT1Rb. We previously demonstrated that AT1Rb is expressed at much higher levels compared with AT1Ra in cerebral pial arteries and is required for myogenic contractility in these vessels, whereas AT1Ra is unnecessary for this function. Here, we found that AT1Ra and AT1Rb are expressed at similar levels in parenchymal arterioles and that genetic knockout of AT1Ra blunted the ability of these vessels to generate myogenic tone. We also found that AT1Rb and total AT1R expression levels are much lower in parenchymal arterioles compared with pial arteries and that parenchymal arterioles are less sensitive to the vasoconstrictive effects of the endogenous AT1R ligand angiotensin II (ANG II). We conclude that 1) AT1Rs are critical for the initiation, but not the maintenance, of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles, and 2) lower levels of AT1Rb and total AT1R in parenchymal arterioles compared with pial arteries result in differences in myogenic and ANG II-induced vasoconstriction between these vascular segments.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Myogenic tone is critical for appropriate regulation of cerebral blood flow, but the mechanisms used by vascular smooth muscle cells to detect changes in intraluminal pressure are not fully characterized. Here, we demonstrate angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) is indispensable to initiation, but not maintenance, of myogenic tone in cerebral parenchymal arterioles. Furthermore, we demonstrate differences in AT1R expression levels lead to critical differences in contractile regulation between parenchymal arterioles and cerebral pial arteries.
Keywords: angiotensin II receptor type 1, cerebral arteries, myogenic tone, parenchymal arterioles, vasoconstriction
INTRODUCTION
An interconnected network of cerebral pial arteries at the surface of the brain feeds smaller parenchymal arterioles that penetrate the tissue at right angles to supply extensive capillary beds (16, 25, 38). Despite being separated by only a single branch point, pial arteries and parenchymal arterioles are anatomically and functionally distinct. For example, the pial artery network exhibits significant collateralization, which allows restoration of regional perfusion if a single artery is blocked (34). In contrast, solitary parenchymal arterioles supply individual cortical columns of the brain such that their occlusion leads to a corresponding microinfarct (26). The signaling mechanisms that regulate the contractility of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in the walls of pial arteries and parenchymal arterioles also differ. This is exemplified by studies showing that the activity of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BK) channels provides critical negative feedback to limit the magnitude and duration of pial artery constriction (18, 19) but has much less impact on the regulation of parenchymal arteriole contractile properties (8). A more comprehensive understanding of the differences in signaling mechanisms governing SMC contractility between pial arteries and parenchymal arterioles could lead to a better understanding of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow, neurovascular coupling, and the mechanisms that underlie cerebrovascular pathologies, including stroke, small vessel disease, and vascular cognitive impairment. The vascular myogenic response (1) is critically important for the autoregulation of cerebral blood flow. This response causes muscularized blood vessels to constrict in response to increasing perfusion pressure and relax when pressure decreases, thereby adjusting local vascular resistance to minimize changes in blood flow rates (4, 6, 30). In this study, we focused on the role of type 1 angiotensin II receptors (AT1Rs) in regulating the myogenic tone of parenchymal arterioles and how differences in AT1R subtype expression levels affect vasoconstrictor signaling pathways in SMCs from these vessels.
AT1Rs are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) present on the plasma membrane of many types of cells. In SMCs, activation of AT1Rs by binding of the endogenous peptide agonist angiotensin II (ANG II) (24) or by direct mechanical stretch (22, 37, 45) initiates signaling cascades that increase SMC contractility. A single form of AT1R is expressed in humans but two highly similar subtypes, AT1Ra and AT1Rb, which are both >92% homologous to the human AT1R, are expressed in rats and mice. AT1Ra and AT1Rb are functionally indistinguishable, but are differentially expressed in some tissues, including native SMCs isolated from cerebral pial arteries (31), where AT1Rb mRNA is expressed at much higher levels than AT1Ra mRNA. Expression of AT1Rb is necessary for the development of myogenic tone in these arteries, whereas knockout of AT1Ra has no effect on this response. It is not currently known if AT1Rs are important for the regulation of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles or if AT1R isotypes are differentially expressed in these vessels.
Here, we show that AT1R activity is necessary for the initiation, but not the maintenance, of myogenic constriction of parenchymal arterioles. We also find that expression levels of AT1Ra and AT1Rb mRNA are similar in parenchymal arterioles, whereas expression levels of AT1Rb are much greater compared with AT1Ra in cerebral pial arteries. Total AT1R mRNA levels are also ~11-fold greater in pial arteries compared with parenchymal arterioles. These differences in overall AT1R expression levels and subtype abundance lead to important differences in both pressure- and agonist-induced contractile regulation between parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries, highlighting the diversity of SMC function in different segments of the cerebral vasculature.
METHODS
Ethical approvals.
Husbandry and all experimental protocols involving animals were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine.
Animals.
Young adult male (8–20 wk old) wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories Bar Harbor, ME) and homozygous global AT1Ra-knockout (Agtr1a−/−) mice (B6.129P2-Agtra1tm1Unc/J; Jackson Laboratories) were used for these studies. A prior study reported that the systolic blood pressure of Agtr1a−/− mice is lower compared with WT controls when measured using the tail-cuff method (WT: 113 ± 2 mmHg; Agtr1a−/−: 89 ± 4 mmHg) and intra-arterial catheters (WT: 133 ± 4 mmHg; Agtr1a−/−: 90 ± 10 mmHg) (17). Animals were maintained in plastic cages (≤5 mice/cage) with free access to food and water in a room with a controlled 12-h:12-h light-dark cycle. Mice were euthanized with 5% isoflurane (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) followed by decapitation before experimentation.
Isolation of pial arteries and parenchymal arterioles.
Cerebral pial arteries were gently removed from the brain in ice-cold (~4°C), Mg2+-physiological saline solution (Mg2+-PSS) consisting of 134 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, and 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), pH 7.4. Parenchymal arterioles were isolated using our previously described procedure (29). Briefly, a 5 × 3-mm section of brain surrounding the middle cerebral artery was removed. The pia containing the middle cerebral artery was then gently separated by blunt dissection, and parenchymal arterioles were carefully dissected free of the pia.
Pressure myography.
Isolated, endothelium-intact cerebral parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice were mounted between two glass cannulas (outer diameter: 30–50 μm) in a pressure myography chamber (Living Systems Instrumentation, Burlington, VT) and secured using nylon monofilament thread. Cannulated parenchymal arterioles were bathed in warmed (37°C), oxygenated (21% O2-6% CO2-73% N2) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; in mM: 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 4 glucose) at an initial intraluminal pressure of 5 mmHg using aCSF as the intraluminal solution and were allowed to equilibrate for 15 min. Cannulated pial arteries were bathed in warmed, oxygenated PSS (in mM: 119 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1.17 MgSO4, 1.18 KH2PO4, 21 NaHCO3, 4 glucose, and 0.026 EDTA) at an initial intraluminal pressure of 5 mmHg using PSS as the intraluminal solution and were allowed to equilibrate for 15 min. Pressurized parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries were visualized, and luminal diameter was recorded using an inverted microscope (Accu-Scope, Commack, NY) coupled to a CCD camera (The Imaging Source, Charlotte, NC) controlled by IonWizard software (version 6.4.1.73; IonOptix, Westwood, MA). The viability of preparations was verified by measuring vasoconstriction in response to superfusion with isotonic aCSF or PSS containing elevated K+ concentration ([K+]; 60 mM). Arterioles that showed <10% constriction in response to elevated [K+] were considered nonviable and were excluded from further study.
Myogenic response.
The myogenic response of parenchymal arterioles to acute increases in intraluminal pressure was assessed by slowly raising intraluminal pressure in a stepwise fashion from 5 to 20 mmHg and then to 140 mmHg in 20-mmHg increments. Arterioles were maintained at each pressure step until a steady-state diameter was reached. Following completion of initial control pressure steps, intraluminal pressure was lowered to 5 mmHg and the vessels were allowed to equilibrate for 15 min before losartan, captopril, or vehicle (water) was added to superfusing bath. Vessels were pretreated with drugs (or vehicle) for 15 min before the initiation of pressure challenges and for the remainder of the experiment. Following completion of these procedures, the intraluminal pressure was lowered to 5 mmHg and arterioles were superfused with Ca2+-free aCSF supplemented with EGTA (2 mM) and the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker diltiazem (10 μM) to inhibit SMC contraction and reveal the passive diameter of the arteriole segment. Passive luminal diameter was recorded under these conditions as the intraluminal pressure was raised from 5 to 20 mmHg and then to 140 mmHg in 20-mmHg increments. Myogenic tone at each pressure step was calculated as myogenic tone (%) = [1 – (active lumen diameter/passive lumen diameter)] × 100.
Acute administration of losartan.
The impact of AT1R inhibition on preestablished myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles was assessed by first slowly raising intraluminal pressure from 5 to 20 mmHg and then to 60 mmHg in 20-mmHg increments to induce spontaneous myogenic tone. After arterioles reached a steady-state diameter at 60 mmHg, losartan (1 µM) was added to the superfusing bath and was maintained for at least 5 min or until the vessels reached a steady-state diameter. The arterioles were subsequently superfused with Ca2+-free aCSF supplemented with EGTA (2 mM) and diltiazem (10 μM) to reveal the passive diameter of the arteriole segment. Myogenic tone in the absence and presence of losartan was calculated as myogenic tone (%) = [1 – (active lumen diameter/passive lumen diameter)] × 100.
ANG II-induced contractility.
The contractility of parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries in response to ANG II was assessed at an intraluminal pressure of 20 mmHg to minimize the development of spontaneous myogenic tone. Following a 15-min equilibration period, vessels were superfused with aCSF (parenchymal arterioles) or PSS (pial arteries) containing different concentrations of ANG II (0.1–100 nM) until a steady-state diameter was reached. Luminal diameter was recorded before addition of ANG II (baseline) and at the peak response. ANG II response was calculated as vasoconstriction (%) = [(baseline – peak response)/baseline] × 100. The possibility that AT1Rs in pial arteries desensitize in response to repeated application of ANG II was evaluated by repeating administration of ANG II at the same concentration after a 20-min washout with PSS. These studies suggested that desensitization of AT1Rs persisted for at least 20 min. Therefore, ANG II treatment of arteries and arterioles was limited to a single exposure.
RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and end point/quantitative PCR.
Isolated whole pial arteries or parenchymal arterioles were suspended in TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and homogenized using a syringe and 20-gauge needle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,800 g for 5 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. RNA was isolated using Direct-zol RNA MicroPrep (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA), and treated with OPTIZYME DNase I (Fisher BioReagents, Pittsburgh, PA) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quanta, Gaithersburg, MD).
Quantitative PCR was performed on a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher) using Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (ThermoFisher) and the following specific primer pairs: β-actin (Actb; NM_007393): 5′-CCAGCCTTCCTTCTTGGGTA-3′ (sense) and 5′-AGAGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACG-3′ (antisense); AT1Ra (Agtr1a; NM_177322): 5′-GACCAACTCAACCCAGAAAAGC-3′ (sense) and 5′-GGGGCAGTCATCTTGAATTCTT-3′ (antisense); AT1Rb (Agtr1b; NM_175086): 5′- GCAGCATTTAGCTAGACAGTTC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AACAGTAGCTTTGCTCTGGGG-3′ (antisense); and total AT1R (Agtr1a and Agtr1b): 5′-GATCGCTTCGGCCAGCGTCA-3′ (sense) and 5′-GCCAAGCCAGCCATCAGCCA-3′ (antisense). Reactions without template cDNA served as contamination controls. Quantitative PCR data were normalized to Actb expression levels and analyzed using the ΔΔCT method (21). All RT-PCR assays were repeated three times for each sample and were independently replicated using RNA extracted from three different animals in each experimental group.
Statistical analysis.
All summary data are expressed as means ± SE. Prism 8.1.2 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) was used to perform statistical analyses and construct graphs. The significance of differences in ANG II contractile responses and myogenic reactivity were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with a Sidak post hoc test. Differences in the constriction of pial arteries in response to repeated administration of ANG II was analyzed by paired two-tailed t-test. The constriction of parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries in response to elevated extracellular [K+] was analyzed by unpaired two-tailed t-test. mRNA expression levels were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed t-test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all experiments.
RESULTS
Agonist-independent AT1R activity is essential for the initiation of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles.
Pressure myography was used to investigate the importance of AT1R-activated signaling pathways in the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles. We found that pretreatment with losartan (1 µM), a selective AT1R antagonist, significantly impaired the development of myogenic tone across a range of intraluminal pressures in parenchymal arterioles isolated from WT mice (Fig. 1A). To determine if this effect was related to local generation of ANG II by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), we investigated the impact of the selective ACE inhibitor captopril (10 µM). We found that captopril had no effect on the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 1B). As expected, control studies showed that water (vehicle for both losartan and captopril) had no effect on the development of myogenic tone (Fig. 1C). However, in agreement with a previous study (4), we found that acute application of losartan to untreated parenchymal arterioles with spontaneously established myogenic tone had no effect on luminal diameter (Fig. 1D). Together, these data indicate that the activity of AT1Rs, which is independent of ACE activity, is required for the initiation of myogenic constriction in parenchymal arterioles, but once established, myogenic tone is maintained when these receptors are blocked.
Fig. 1.
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) activity is required for the development, but not the maintenance, of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles. A: representative traces and summary data demonstrating that pretreatment with the selective AT1R blocker losartan (1 µM) prevents the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles (N = 4 animals, n = 6 arterioles for both groups; two-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test, *P < 0.05). B: representative traces and summary data demonstrating that pretreatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril (10 µM) does not alter the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles. (N = 4 animals, n = 6 arterioles for both groups; two-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test). C: representative traces and summary data demonstrating that pretreatment with water (vehicle for both losartan and captopril) does not alter the ability of parenchymal arterioles to develop myogenic tone (N = 4 animals, n = 6 arterioles for both groups; two-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test). D: representative trace and summary data demonstrating that acute administration of losartan (1 µM) to parenchymal arterioles with preestablished myogenic tone does not alter luminal diameter (N = 3 animals, n = 6 arterioles; paired t-test).
Myogenic constriction is impaired in parenchymal arterioles from Agtr1a−/− mice.
Our previous study showed that genetic knockout of the AT1Ra isotype has no effect on the myogenic tone of cerebral pial arteries, likely due to high expression levels of AT1Rb (31). To determine the specific role of AT1Ra in pressure-induced constriction of parenchymal arterioles, we compared myogenic tone between parenchymal arterioles isolated from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice. These experiments showed that parenchymal arterioles isolated from Agtr1a−/− mice developed significantly less myogenic tone across a range of intraluminal pressures compared with arterioles from WT mice (Fig. 2A). Control experiments demonstrated that constriction of parenchymal arterioles from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice in response to direct depolarization of the SMC plasma membrane by elevation of extracellular [K+] did not differ, suggesting that knockout of AT1Ra does not grossly alter voltage-dependent Ca2+-influx pathways or the contractile apparatus (Fig. 2B). Expression level analysis of Agtr1b, encoding AT1Rb, in parenchymal arterioles isolated from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice exhibited that Agtr1a−/− did not impact AT1Rb expression levels in parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that AT1Ra expression is critically important for the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles.
Fig. 2.
Parenchymal arterioles from Agtr1a−/− mice exhibit a diminished myogenic response. A: representative traces and summary data showing that parenchymal arterioles isolated from Agtr1a−/− mice generate significantly less myogenic tone compared with those isolated from wild-type (WT) mice (WT: N = 4 animals; Agtr1a−/−: N = 3 animals; n = 6 arterioles for both groups; two-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test). B: summary data showing that constriction in response to elevated extracellular K+ concentration ([K+]; 60 mM) does not differ between parenchymal arterioles isolated from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice (WT: N = 4 animals; Agtr1a−/−: N = 3 animals; n = 6 arterioles for both groups; unpaired t-test, *P < 0.05). C: quantitative RT-PCR results showing angiotensin II type 1 receptor b (AT1Rb) expression in parenchymal arterioles isolated from WT and Agtr1a−/− mice. mRNA expression was normalized to Actb, encoding β-actin (n = 3 animals/group; unpaired t-test).
AT1R is expressed at much lower levels in parenchymal arterioles compared with cerebral pial arteries.
Expression levels of Agtr1a and Agtr1b, encoding AT1Ra and AT1Rb, respectively, were independently assessed in parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries using quantitative RT-PCR. We found that AT1Ra and AT1Rb mRNA were expressed at similar levels in parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 3A). In contrast, and in agreement with our prior study (31), we found that AT1Rb mRNA was expressed at much higher levels compared with AT1Ra mRNA in pial arteries (Fig. 3A). A comparison of isotypes between vascular segments showed that AT1Ra expression levels were similar in parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries (Fig. 3A), but AT1Rb expression levels were ~15-fold higher in pial arteries compared with parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 3A). Overall, total AT1R expression was 11-fold higher in pial arteries compared with parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor a (AT1Ra), AT1Rb, and total AT1R in parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries. A: quantitative RT-PCR results showing expression levels of mRNA encoding AT1Ra and AT1Rb in parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries (n = 3 animals/group; N.S., not significant; t-test, *P < 0.05). B: quantitative RT-PCR results showing total AT1R expression in parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries. mRNA expression was normalized to Actb, encoding β-actin (n = 3 animals/group; N.S., not significant; unpaired t-test, *P < 0.05).
Parenchymal arterioles are less sensitive to the vasoconstrictor effects of ANG II compared with pial arteries.
The fact that total AT1R mRNA expression levels were much lower in parenchymal arterioles compared with cerebral pial arteries suggested that parenchymal arterioles might be less sensitive to the vasoconstrictor effects of ANG II. In initial experiments designed to test this possibility, we found that the contractile response of cerebral pial arteries to a second administration of ANG II (100 nM) was greatly diminished compared with the first administration, even after a 20-min interval between challenges (Fig. 4). These results are consistent with previous studies showing that AT1Rs are rapidly internalized and desensitized following stimulation with ANG II (9, 14, 28, 33). Therefore, in subsequent concentration-response studies, vessels were exposed once to a single concentration of ANG II.
Fig. 4.
Rapid and persistent desensitization to the vasoconstrictor effects of ANG II. Representative trace (left) and summary (right) data showing that vasoconstriction in response to a second application of ANG II (100 nM), administered after 20 min, is significantly blunted compared with the first administration (N = 3 animals, n = 6 pial arteries; paired t-test, *P < 0.05).
At low concentrations, ANG II had little effect on the luminal diameter of either parenchymal arterioles or pial arteries (Fig. 5A). At a higher concentration (100 nM), ANG II induced significant constriction of cerebral pial arteries but had little effect on the luminal diameter of parenchymal arterioles (Fig. 5A), demonstrating that parenchymal arterioles are less sensitive to the constrictor effects of ANG II compared with pial arteries. In control experiments, constriction of parenchymal arterioles in response to elevated extracellular [K+] was greater than that of pial arteries (Fig. 5B), indicating that the parenchymal arterioles used for this study show robust contractile responses to direct SMC depolarization.
Fig. 5.
Parenchymal arterioles are less sensitive to the contractile effects of ANG II compared with pial arteries. A: representative traces showing that constriction of parenchymal arterioles in response to ANG II (100 nM) is significantly lower compared with that of pial arteries. B: summary data comparing the vasoconstrictive effects of ANG II at different concentrations (N = 3–5 animals, n = 6 vessels for each group at each concentration of ANG II; two-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc test, *P < 0.05). C: summary data showing constriction of parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries in response to elevated K+ concentration ([K+]; 60 mM) (n = 24 in both groups; unpaired t-test, *P < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
The vascular myogenic response is a fundamental autoregulatory process that minimizes blood flow variability during changes in perfusion pressure (1). Multiple studies support the concept that AT1Rs, or other GPCRs, serve as the fundamental detectors of intravascular pressure that initiate this process (3, 11, 22, 31, 37, 45). Here, we found that blocking AT1R activity prevented the development of myogenic tone in cerebral parenchymal arterioles but had no effect on preestablished myogenic tone. We also found that genetic knockout of AT1Ra impaired the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles, demonstrating a critical role for this isotype in the response. An mRNA analysis demonstrated that AT1Rb and total AT1R expression levels are much lower in parenchymal arterioles compared with those in pial arteries. Consequently, parenchymal arterioles are less sensitive to the constrictor effects of ANG II compared with pial arteries. We conclude that agonist-independent AT1R activity is necessary for the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles and that both isotypes contribute to this response. Our data also show that differential expression of AT1Rs between parenchymal arterioles and pial arteries leads to differing sensitivity to the vasoconstrictor effects of ANG II within the cerebral microvasculature.
The molecular composition of the apparatus used by SMCs to detect changes in mechanical force at the vessel wall remains a central unanswered question in vascular biology. Piezo channels are fundamental sensors of mechanical force in many tissues throughout the body (7), but conditional knockout of Piezo1 in SMCs has no effect on the development of myogenic tone in cerebral arteries, and Piezo2 is not expressed in vascular SMCs (32). Various reports have provided support for a role for several transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels, including TRPC6, TRPM4, TRPV2, and TRPP1 (10), as well as TMEM16A Cl− channels (5), in this response. However, none of these channels have been conclusively shown to be inherently mechanosensitive; they may instead be activated by signaling pathways that are initiated by a fundamental sensor of pressure at the vascular wall (13). Several studies support the concept that GPCRs are capable of serving as the primary mechanosensor in vascular SMCs. The first evidence supporting this concept was provided by Zou et al. (45), who showed that signaling cascades linked to AT1Rs could be activated by mechanical stretch in a manner that was independent of ANG II production. A subsequent study showed that mechanical stress activates AT1R independent of agonist binding by causing an anticlockwise rotation that shifts transmembrane domain 7 into the ligand-binding domain (43). Further work in this area has identified additional ligand-independent mechanosensitive GPCRs (23, 39), including GPR68 (42). Mederos y Schnitzler et al. (22) investigated the concept that agonist-independent activation of GPCRs in vascular SMCs regulates myogenic constriction and presented evidence that losartan diminishes pressure-induced constriction of renal and cerebral arteries, suggesting a central role for AT1Rs in this process. We reported that AT1R is upstream of a pressure-sensitive signal transduction cascade involving phospholipase Cγ1, and further showed that TRPM4 is necessary for myogenic constriction of cerebral pial arteries (11, 31). Here, we found that losartan also blocks the development of myogenic tone in cerebral parenchymal arterioles, suggesting that AT1Rs are critical for this response in these vessels. However, losartan had no effect on parenchymal arterioles with preestablished myogenic tone. These findings are consistent with a study by Brayden, et al., who reported that the AT1R blocker candesartan did not relax parenchymal arterioles with predeveloped myogenic tone (4). This latter study also reported that pharmacological inhibition of P2Y receptors relaxed parenchymal arterioles with established myogenic tone, and that molecular knockdown of P2Y4 and P2Y6 impairs the development of myogenic tone in these vessels (4). A follow up study from this research group reported that purinergic receptors likely act upstream of TRPM4 channels in parenchymal arterioles causing SMC depolarization and activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels as well as inhibiting myosin light chain phosphatase activity (20). The current findings, together with prior reports, suggest a model in which AT1Rs are necessary for the initiation of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles, but tone is maintained by mechanosensitive purinergic receptors or other GPCRs in the absence of AT1R activity.
A single type of AT1R (encoded by AGTR1) is expressed in humans, whereas two isotypes, AT1Ra (Agtr1a) and AT1Rb (Agtr1b), are expressed in rodents. AT1Ra and AT1Rb appear to be functionally redundant, as the two proteins differ at only 23 of 359 amino acids, and both engage the same Gq/11-coupled PLC signaling cascades (41, 44). However, recent studies suggest that AT1R isotypes are differentially expressed in different vascular tissues. Work from Blodow et al. (3) and a study from our laboratory (31) show that mRNA encoding AT1Rb is expressed at much higher levels in mesenteric and cerebral pial arteries compared with AT1Ra. These studies found that, as a result of higher levels of AT1Rb expression, genetic knockout of AT1Ra has little effect on myogenic tone, but pretreatment with losartan impaired myogenic tone suggesting AT1Rb plays a critical role in the development of myogenic tone in mesenteric and cerebral pial arteries. In contrast, studies from another laboratory reported reduced pressure-induced vasoconstriction in mesenteric and renal arteries from AT1Ra-knockout mice (37). In the current study, we confirmed that AT1Rb is expressed at much higher levels than AT1Ra in cerebral pial arteries, but we found that the two isotypes are expressed at similar levels in cerebral parenchymal arterioles. Knockout of AT1Ra diminished, but did not eliminate, the ability of parenchymal arterioles to develop myogenic tone. These data suggest that both isotypes contribute to the development of myogenic tone in parenchymal arterioles. Considering both the prior results obtained using pial arteries and those reported here for parenchymal arterioles, we propose that the relative impact of each AT1R isotype on the initiation of myogenic constriction is determined by expression level.
Our data show that total AT1R (i.e., AT1Ra + AT1Rb) mRNA expression levels are much greater in cerebral pial arteries compared with parenchymal arterioles. We were unable to quantify total AT1R protein expression in vascular tissue using conventional Western blot or the Wes capillary electrophoresis immunoassay system because we found that commercially available anti-AT1R primary antibodies lack sufficient selectivity, as has also been reported by others (2, 12). However, we did find a correlation between lower AT1R mRNA expression levels in parenchymal arterioles and diminished sensitivity to the vasoconstrictive effects of ANG II compared with pial arteries. This difference may be an important adaptation that decreases the likelihood of focal ischemia in the brain due to parenchymal arteriole constriction during physiological stresses that increase ANG II release.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that AT1Rs are indispensable for the initiation, but not the maintenance, of myogenic contractility in parenchymal arterioles. Our data also show that AT1R isotype expression level is correlated with the impact of knocking out a specific subtype on the development of myogenic tone, providing a potential explanation for contradictory findings from previous studies. We also show that parenchymal arterioles have significantly lower total AT1R mRNA levels compared with upstream pial arteries and that this difference in expression leads to differential contractility in response to ANG II between these vascular segments.
GRANTS
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-HL-091905, R01-HL-137852, R01-HL-139585, R01-HL-146054, RF1-NS-110044, and P20-GM-130459 (to S. Earley).
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
E.Y. and SE conceived and designed research; E.Y., P.T., and V.K. performed experiments; E.Y., P.T., and V.K. analyzed data; E.Y. and SE interpreted results of experiments; E.Y. prepared figures; E.Y. drafted manuscript; E.Y. and SE edited and revised manuscript; E.Y., P.T., V.K., and SE approved final version of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bayliss WM. On the local reactions of the arterial wall to changes of internal pressure. J Physiol 28: 220–231, 1902. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1902.sp000911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benicky J, Hafko R, Sanchez-Lemus E, Aguilera G, Saavedra JM. Six commercially available angiotensin II AT1 receptor antibodies are non-specific. Cell Mol Neurobiol 32: 1353–1365, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10571-012-9862-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blodow S, Schneider H, Storch U, Wizemann R, Forst AL, Gudermann T, Mederos y Schnitzler M. Novel role of mechanosensitive AT1B receptors in myogenic vasoconstriction. Pflugers Arch 466: 1343–1353, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1372-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brayden JE, Li Y, Tavares MJ. Purinergic receptors regulate myogenic tone in cerebral parenchymal arterioles. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33: 293–299, 2013. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bulley S, Neeb ZP, Burris SK, Bannister JP, Thomas-Gatewood CM, Jangsangthong W, Jaggar JH. TMEM16A/ANO1 channels contribute to the myogenic response in cerebral arteries. Circ Res 111: 1027–1036, 2012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.277145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cipolla MJ, Sweet J, Chan SL, Tavares MJ, Gokina N, Brayden JE. Increased pressure-induced tone in rat parenchymal arterioles vs. middle cerebral arteries: role of ion channels and calcium sensitivity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 117: 53–59, 2014. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330: 55–60, 2010. doi: 10.1126/science.1193270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dabertrand F, Nelson MT, Brayden JE. Acidosis dilates brain parenchymal arterioles by conversion of calcium waves to sparks to activate BK channels. Circ Res 110: 285–294, 2012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.258145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Godoy MA, de Oliveira AM, Rattan S. Angiotensin II-induced relaxation of anococcygeus smooth muscle via desensitization of AT1 receptor, and activation of AT2 receptor associated with nitric-oxide synthase pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 311: 394–401, 2004. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.069856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Earley S, Brayden JE. Transient receptor potential channels in the vasculature. Physiol Rev 95: 645–690, 2015. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gonzales AL, Yang Y, Sullivan MN, Sanders L, Dabertrand F, Hill-Eubanks DC, Nelson MT, Earley S. A PLCγ1-dependent, force-sensitive signaling network in the myogenic constriction of cerebral arteries. Sci Signal 7: ra49, 2014. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Herrera M, Sparks MA, Alfonso-Pecchio AR, Harrison-Bernard LM, Coffman TM. Lack of specificity of commercial antibodies leads to misidentification of angiotensin type 1 receptor protein. Hypertension 61: 253–258, 2013. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.203679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hill-Eubanks DC, Gonzales AL, Sonkusare SK, Nelson MT. Vascular TRP channels: performing under pressure and going with the flow. Physiology (Bethesda) 29: 343–360, 2014. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00009.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holloway AC, Qian H, Pipolo L, Ziogas J, Miura S, Karnik S, Southwell BR, Lew MJ, Thomas WG. Side-chain substitutions within angiotensin II reveal different requirements for signaling, internalization, and phosphorylation of type 1A angiotensin receptors. Mol Pharmacol 61: 768–777, 2002. doi: 10.1124/mol.61.4.768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iadecola C, Nedergaard M. Glial regulation of the cerebral microvasculature. Nat Neurosci 10: 1369–1376, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nn2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ito M, Oliverio MI, Mannon PJ, Best CF, Maeda N, Smithies O, Coffman TM. Regulation of blood pressure by the type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 3521–3525, 1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Knot HJ, Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure. J Physiol 508: 199–209, 1998. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Knot HJ, Standen NB, Nelson MT. Ryanodine receptors regulate arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat via Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. J Physiol 508: 211–221, 1998. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211br.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li Y, Baylie RL, Tavares MJ, Brayden JE. TRPM4 channels couple purinergic receptor mechanoactivation and myogenic tone development in cerebral parenchymal arterioles. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34: 1706–1714, 2014. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25: 402–408, 2001. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mederos y Schnitzler M, Storch U, Meibers S, Nurwakagari P, Breit A, Essin K, Gollasch M, Gudermann T. Gq-coupled receptors as mechanosensors mediating myogenic vasoconstriction. EMBO J 27: 3092–3103, 2008. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mederos Y Schnitzler M, Storch U, Gudermann T. Mechanosensitive Gq/11 protein-coupled receptors mediate myogenic vasoconstriction. Microcirculation 23: 621–625, 2016. doi: 10.1111/micc.12293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mehta PK, Griendling KK. Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C82–C97, 2007. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00287.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nedergaard M, Ransom B, Goldman SA. New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends Neurosci 26: 523–530, 2003. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nishimura N, Schaffer CB, Friedman B, Lyden PD, Kleinfeld D. Penetrating arterioles are a bottleneck in the perfusion of neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 365–370, 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609551104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oliveira L, Costa-Neto CM, Nakaie CR, Schreier S, Shimuta SI, Paiva AC. The angiotensin II AT1 receptor structure-activity correlations in the light of rhodopsin structure. Physiol Rev 87: 565–592, 2007. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00040.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pires PW, Dabertrand F, Earley S. Isolation and cannulation of cerebral parenchymal arterioles. J Vis Exp 111: 2016. doi: 10.3791/53835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pires PW, Jackson WF, Dorrance AM. Regulation of myogenic tone and structure of parenchymal arterioles by hypertension and the mineralocorticoid receptor. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 309: H127–H136, 2015. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00168.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pires PW, Ko EA, Pritchard HA, Rudokas M, Yamasaki E, Earley S. The angiotensin II receptor type 1b is the primary sensor of intraluminal pressure in cerebral artery smooth muscle cells. J Physiol 595: 4735–4753, 2017. doi: 10.1113/JP274310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Retailleau K, Duprat F, Arhatte M, Ranade SS, Peyronnet R, Martins JR, Jodar M, Moro C, Offermanns S, Feng Y, Demolombe S, Patel A, Honoré E. Piezo1 in smooth muscle cells is involved in hypertension-dependent arterial remodeling. Cell Reports 13: 1161–1171, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sasamura H, Dzau VJ, Pratt RE. Desensitization of angiotensin receptor function. Kidney Int 46: 1499–1501, 1994. doi: 10.1038/ki.1994.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schaffer CB, Friedman B, Nishimura N, Schroeder LF, Tsai PS, Ebner FF, Lyden PD, Kleinfeld D. Two-photon imaging of cortical surface microvessels reveals a robust redistribution in blood flow after vascular occlusion. PLoS Biol 4: e22, 2006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schleifenbaum J, Kassmann M, Szijártó IA, Hercule HC, Tano JY, Weinert S, Heidenreich M, Pathan AR, Anistan YM, Alenina N, Rusch NJ, Bader M, Jentsch TJ, Gollasch M. Stretch-activation of angiotensin II type 1a receptors contributes to the myogenic response of mouse mesenteric and renal arteries. Circ Res 115: 263–272, 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.302882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Simard M, Arcuino G, Takano T, Liu QS, Nedergaard M. Signaling at the gliovascular interface. J Neurosci 23: 9254–9262, 2003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09254.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Storch U, Mederos y Schnitzler M, Gudermann T. G protein-mediated stretch reception. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302: H1241–H1249, 2012. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00818.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tian Y, Baukal AJ, Sandberg K, Bernstein KE, Balla T, Catt KJ. Properties of AT1a and AT1b angiotensin receptors expressed in adrenocortical Y-1 cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E831–E839, 1996. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.5.E831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu J, Mathur J, Vessières E, Hammack S, Nonomura K, Favre J, Grimaud L, Petrus M, Francisco A, Li J, Lee V, Xiang FL, Mainquist JK, Cahalan SM, Orth AP, Walker JR, Ma S, Lukacs V, Bordone L, Bandell M, Laffitte B, Xu Y, Chien S, Henrion D, Patapoutian A. GPR68 senses flow and is essential for vascular physiology. Cell 173: 762–775.e16, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yasuda N, Miura S, Akazawa H, Tanaka T, Qin Y, Kiya Y, Imaizumi S, Fujino M, Ito K, Zou Y, Fukuhara S, Kunimoto S, Fukuzaki K, Sato T, Ge J, Mochizuki N, Nakaya H, Saku K, Komuro I. Conformational switch of angiotensin II type 1 receptor underlying mechanical stress-induced activation. EMBO Rep 9: 179–186, 2008. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhou J, Ernsberger P, Douglas JG. A novel angiotensin receptor subtype in rat mesangium. Coupling to adenylyl cyclase. Hypertension 21: 1035–1038, 1993. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.21.6.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zou Y, Akazawa H, Qin Y, Sano M, Takano H, Minamino T, Makita N, Iwanaga K, Zhu W, Kudoh S, Toko H, Tamura K, Kihara M, Nagai T, Fukamizu A, Umemura S, Iiri T, Fujita T, Komuro I. Mechanical stress activates angiotensin II type 1 receptor without the involvement of angiotensin II. Nat Cell Biol 6: 499–506, 2004. doi: 10.1038/ncb1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





