Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2013 Jun 3;110(25):10240–10245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217158110

Essential, dose-dependent role for the transcription factor Gata3 in the development of IL-5+ and IL-13+ type 2 innate lymphoid cells

Roel G J Klein Wolterink a,b,c,d, Nicolas Serafini a,b, Menno van Nimwegen c, Christian A J Vosshenrich a,b, Marjolein J W de Bruijn c, Diogo Fonseca Pereira e, Henrique Veiga Fernandes e, Rudi W Hendriks c,1, James P Di Santo a,b,1,2
PMCID: PMC3690884  PMID: 23733962

Abstract

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s; also called nuocytes, innate helper cells, or natural helper cells) provide protective immunity during helminth infection and play an important role in influenza-induced and allergic airway hyperreactivity. Whereas the transcription factor GATA binding protein 3 (Gata3) is important for the production of IL-5 and -13 by ILC2s in response to IL-33 or -25 stimulation, it is not known whether Gata3 is required for ILC2 development from hematopoietic stem cells. Here, we show that chimeric mice generated with Gata3-deficient fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells fail to develop systemically dispersed ILC2s. In these chimeric mice, in vivo administration of IL-33 or -25 fails to expand ILC2 numbers or to induce characteristic ILC2-dependent IL-5 or -13 production. Moreover, cell-intrinsic Gata3 expression is required for ILC2 development in vitro and in vivo. Using mutant and transgenic mice in which Gata3 gene copy number is altered, we show that ILC2 generation from common lymphoid progenitors, as well as ILC2 homeostasis and cytokine production, is regulated by Gata3 expression levels in a dose-dependent fashion. Collectively, these results identify Gata3 as a critical early regulator of ILC2 development, thereby extending the paradigm of Gata3-dependent control of type 2 immunity to include both innate and adaptive lymphocytes.

Keywords: asthma, innate immunity


Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s; also known as natural helper cells, nuocytes, or innate helper cells) represent a population of non-T/non-B lymphocytes that promptly produce large amounts of the T helper 2 (Th2) cytokines IL-5 and -13. These IL-25– and IL-33–responsive innate cells have a broad distribution (1, 2) and were shown to be essential for the innate response to the helminth parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (2–4). ILC2s can be distinguished by coexpression of CD25, CD127, IL-33R, and IL-25R. ILC2s in the respiratory tract play a crucial role in virus-induced airway hyperreactivity and in maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity during influenza infection (5, 6). Damaged epithelial cells or infected myeloid cells release inflammatory cytokines, including IL-25 and -33, that can potently expand and activate ILC2s in mucosal tissues (7–10). Human ILC2s have been found in the lung and are associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (5, 11). In addition, we and others have shown that ILC2s are major IL-5 and -13 producers in various murine allergic asthma models (7–10, 12).

ILC2s belong to an emerging family of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) that includes ILC1 [natural killer (NK) cells and other innate IFN-γ–producing cells] as well as a distinct group 3 ILC (ILC3) that includes subsets expressing the orphan transcription factor retinoid-related orphan receptor γ (ROR-γ) and producing IL-17 or -22 or having lymphoid tissue inducer function (reviewed by refs. 13, 14). The transcriptional regulator inhibitor of differentiation 2 (Id2) has been identified as a common factor required for all ILC subsets (13, 14); however, the developmental stages from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) to fully mature ILC subsets have not been elucidated. Transient Notch signals appear critical for generation of ILC2s and ILC3s from CLPs (15–19). Nevertheless, the regulatory factors that orchestrate this process are poorly understood, although recently the transcription factor ROR-α was identified as an essential factor for efficient ILC2 development and in particular for IL-25–mediated expansion of the ILC2 compartment (10, 17).

Like Th2 cells, ILC2s promptly produce IL-5, -13, and, to a lesser extent, IL-4 (1–4). Regulation of Il4, Il5, and Il13 expression is complex and in Th2 cells requires the zinc-finger transcription factor GATA binding protein 3 (Gata3), which is selectively up-regulated during Th2 differentiation (refs. 20 and 21 and reviewed in ref. 22). Conditional deletion of the Gata3 gene in established Th2 cells demonstrated that Gata3 is critical for IL-5 and -13, but not IL-4, production by Th2 cells (23). Likewise, deletion of the Gata3 gene in ILC2s abolished their IL-5 and -13 production (24). In addition to its role in regulation of Th2 cytokine expression in Th2 cells and ILC2s, Gata3 is required at multiple stages of T-cell development and has an essential role in the specification of the earliest T-cell progenitors in the thymus (25–27). In this work, hematopoietic chimeras, as well as mutant and transgenic mice in which Gata3 gene copy number is altered, are used to address the essential, dose-dependent role for Gata3 in ILC2 differentiation from lympho-hematopoietic precursors.

Results and Discussion

ILC2s Express High Levels of Gata3 Protein and Require Gata3 Expression for Development in Vivo.

We first analyzed Gata3 protein expression in ILC2s present in different tissue sites (Fig. 1A). ILC2s were identified as lineage-negative cells that coexpress CD25, CD127, and IL-33R as described (3, 4). We found that bone marrow (BM) and lung ILC2s expressed Gata3 levels that exceeded by ∼10-fold the levels expressed by mature CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1A). It remains unclear whether ILC2s in the BM represent immature ILC2 precursors or a “reservoir” of peripheral ILC2s (2), although BM ILC2s clearly produced cytokines (see below) and had similar Gata3 levels as lung ILC2s (Fig. 1A). Gata3+ ILC2s were also identified in spleen, lymph nodes (LNs), and intestine (see below).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

GATA-3 is expressed by ILC2s and is required for ILC2 development in vivo. (A) Gating strategy for analysis of BM and lung ILC2s. Histograms show intracellular expression of GATA-3 of ILC2s (bold line) compared with CD3+ CD4+ T cells (black line) and CD19+ B lymphocytes (gray area). Numbers indicate relative frequencies of gated populations. Shown are representative results from three independent experiments (n ≥ 6 total mice analyzed). (B and C) Analysis of lymphocytes from BM (B) and lung (C) of Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− hosts transplanted with Gata3+/+ and Gata3−/− precursors for expression of the indicated surface markers. Plots show gating strategy for ILC2s. Bar graphs show quantification of the indicated donor-derived populations in chimeras. (D) Analysis of pulmonary Lin− lymphocytes for CD127 and intracellular IL-5 expression. Plots show gating strategy for IL-5+ lymphocytes and ILC2s. Bar graphs show quantification of the indicated populations in Gata3+/+ and Gata3−/− chimeras. (B–D) Shown are representative results from two independent experiments with n = 3 (Gata3+/+) or 5 (Gata3−/−) total mice analyzed per genotype. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

To assess the requirement for Gata3 in the development of ILC2s in vivo, we analyzed chimeric mice generated by using Gata3-deficient hematopoietic precursors cells as described (28, 29). To control for the resultant T-cell deficiency in these chimeras (30), we generated T-cell–deficient, Gata3-proficient chimeras using Cd3e−/− hematopoietic precursors. Both Gata3+/+ and Gata3−/− hematopoietic precursors engrafted to a similar extent, leading to robust B, NK, and myeloid cell reconstitution (Fig. S1A and ref. 28).

Because Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− hosts lack ILC2s (3), all ILC2s in the chimeric mice were donor-derived, as expected (Fig. S1B). Both BM and lung ILC2s developed in Gata3+/+ chimeras (Fig. 1 B and C), and these ILC2s normally expressed CD127, CD25, and IL-33R, as expected (5, 31). In Gata3−/− chimeras, we found a similar number of BM Lin−CD127+ cells, although these cells failed to express characteristic surface markers of ILC2s (Fig. 1B). In the lung of Gata3−/− chimeras, Lin−CD127+ cells were severely reduced, and ILC2s were essentially absent (Fig. 1C).

Analysis of IL-5 production by Lin− cells in the lung and BM of Gata3+/+ chimeras showed that all cells that produced IL-5 were ILC2s (Fig. 1D). In contrast, IL-5 production was undetectable in lung and BM cell preparations from Gata3−/− chimeras (Fig. 1D), consistent with the absence of ILC2 in these tissues (Fig. 1 B and C).

GATA-3 Is Required for Characteristic Innate Responses to Exogenous IL-33 or -25.

Intranasal (i.n.) administration of IL-33 in vivo results in a dramatic increase in the absolute numbers of ILC2s in lung and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (2, 7–10, 32). i.n. IL-33 (Fig. 2A) triggered recruitment of Siglec-F+ eosinophils and Gr-1+ neutrophils in the BAL fluid in Gata3+/+, but not in Gata3−/−, chimeras (Fig. 2B). This inflammatory reaction was accompanied by a dramatic increase in ILC2 numbers within the lung tissue and BAL fluid of Gata3+/+, but not Gata3−/−, chimeras (Fig. 2 C and D). Gata3+/+ ILC2s in the lung promptly produced IL-5 and -13 following stimulation, whereas cytokine production was not detected in Lin− cells from Gata3−/− chimeras (Fig. S2). We conclude that lung-resident IL-33–responsive ILC2s require Gata3 for their generation and/or function.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

GATA-3 is required for in vivo responses mediated by i.n. IL-33 and systemic IL-25 challenge. (A) Protocol of i.n. administration of recombinant IL-33 on the 3 d indicated with arrows. Mice were analyzed (A) on day 6. (B) Flow cytometric analysis and quantification of BAL fluid granulocytes for expression of indicated markers in IL-33–challenged Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− hosts transplanted with Gata3+/+ and Gata3−/− precursors. (C and D) Flow cytometric identification (contour plots) and quantification (bar graphs) of ILC2s in donor-derived lymphocytes in lung (C) and BAL fluid (D) of challenged chimeras. (E) Gata3+/+ and Gata3−/− chimeric mice were challenged with recombinant IL-25 protein as outlined in the protocol. Bar graphs show quantification of donor-derived ILC2s of the indicated tissues 1 d after the last challenge. Shown are representative results from two independent experiments with n ≥ 6 total mice analyzed per genotype. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

Because the expression of the IL-33R component T1/ST2 is regulated by GATA-3 (21), the failure of Gata3−/− chimeras to respond to IL-33 in vivo may in part be explained by the lack of receptor expression by Gata3−/− ILC2s (Figs. 1 and 2). Systemically administered IL-25 can trigger an inflammatory response from ILC2s that provokes multisystem myeloid cell recruitment and mucus production (33). IL-25 injection resulted in the expansion of ILC2s in the BM and lung of Gata3+/+, but not Gata3−/−, chimeras (Fig. 2E and Fig. S3A). Although we found that ILC2s were the major source of IL-5 produced by lung Lin− lymphocytes, IL-5 was not detected in these cells in the absence of Gata3 (Fig. S3B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that characteristic inflammatory responses following triggering of ILC2s by IL-25 and -33 are not elicited in chimeric mice made with Gata3−/− hematopoietic precursors.

Failure of ILC2 Differentiation from Gata3−/− Hematopoietic Precursors in Vitro.

Notch-triggered differentiation of ILC2s from CLPs can be achieved in vitro by using stromal cells expressing delta-like ligand 4 in the presence of IL-7 and IL-33 (19). We found that culture of Gata3+/+ fetal liver (FL) hematopoietic precursors generated abundant ILC2s using this approach (Fig. S4A), whereas cells expressing characteristic surface markers of ILC2s were markedly reduced in the absence of Gata3 (Fig. S4A). RT-PCR analysis of these FL cultures showed that in the absence of Gata3, Id2 and Rora expression were not induced (Fig. S5); these transcription factors are highly expressed in ILC2s and are critical for their development (3, 17, 34). Moreover, we could not detect IL-5 or -13 production in these ILC2 Gata3−/− cultures, whereas ILC2 cultures of Gata3+/+ fetal liver hematopoietic precursors gave rise to cells with characteristic IL-5 and -13 production (Fig. S4B).

Cell-Intrinsic Gata3 Is Required for ILC2 Development.

To exclude the possibility that cell-extrinsic effects caused by Gata3 deficiency underlie the observed defects in ILC2 development, we generated and analyzed BM chimeras generated by using 9:1 mixtures of CD45.2+ Gata3−/− and CD45.1+ wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 hematopoietic precursors, respectively. Mice injected with 9:1 mixtures of CD45.2+ Gata3+/− and CD45.1+ Gata3+/+ precursors served as controls (Fig. 3A). Both sets of mixed chimeras reconstituted to a similar extent (Fig. S6A). We confirmed that B and NK cell development occurred normally from both Gata3−/− and Gata3+/+ precursors (Fig. 3B and Fig. S6B), and phenotypically mature ILC2s were generated in BM, lung, spleen, and small intestine (Fig. 3C and Fig. S6C). Further analysis revealed that all ILC2s in Gata3−/− mixed BM chimeras expressed CD45.1+ (originating from Gata3+/+ precursors), whereas ILC2s in Gata3+/− mixed chimeras originated from both CD45.2+ Gata3+/− and CD45.1+ Gata3+/+ precursors (Fig. 3C and Fig. S6D). This result demonstrates that Gata3 is required in a cell-intrinsic fashion for ILC2 development. Interestingly, although analysis of the origin of B and NK cells recapitulated the ratio in which precursors were injected (i.e., 86–87% of the B and NK cells were CD45.2+ independent of Gata3 genotype), ILC2s derived from Gata3+/− precursors were underrepresented relative to those derived from their Gata3+/+ counterparts in control chimeras (Fig. 3C). This result suggests that the Gata3 gene dosage may influence overall ILC2 development.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cell-intrinsic GATA-3 is required for ILC2 development. (A) Experimental protocol. Analysis was performed 5 wk after transplantation. (B) Analysis of B and NK cell development in chimeric mice. (C) ILC2 analysis in mixed chimeras. Numbers indicate relative frequencies of gated populations.

GATA-3 Gene Copy Positively Correlates with ILC2 Development, Homeostasis, and Function.

We next compared the effects of modifying GATA3 gene copy number on ILC2 development and function. We characterized ILC2 homeostasis and function in three mouse strains: C57BL/6 mice with two functional Gata3 alleles, Gata3lacZ/+ mice with one functional Gata3 allele (the second allele is disrupted by insertion of a beta-galactosidase reporter (35), and transgenic C57BL/6 mice that harbor a Gata3 transgene under the control of the human CD2 promoter (36). We found that Gata3 protein levels in BM and lung ILC2s were reduced in Gata3lacZ/+ mice compared with C57BL/6 mice, indicating that both Gata3 alleles are apparently active in ILC2s (Fig. S7A). In contrast, ILC2s from CD2–Gata3 Tg mice expressed the same high levels of Gata3 protein as WT C57BL/6 mice (Fig. S7A). Because we detected increased Gata3 RNA expression in BM ILC2s (Table S1), it is possible that the intracellular FACS assay is not sensitive enough to detect differences in Gata3hi WT and CD2–Gata3 Tg ILC2s.

We next assessed the impact of alterations in Gata3 gene copy number on overall ILC2 homeostasis. Absolute numbers of mature ILC2s in the lung and BM were clearly reduced in Gata3lacZ/+ mice, whereas CD2–Gata3 Tg mice had an approximately threefold increase in BM and lung ILC2s compared with Gata3+/+ C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 4A). ILC2 function also positively correlated with Gata3 gene copy number: ILC2s from CD2–Gata3 Tg mice produced somewhat higher levels of IL-5 and -13 following stimulation compared with ILC2s from B6 WT mice, whereas cytokine production was reduced in ILC2s from Gata3lacZ/+ mice having only one functional Gata3 allele (Fig. 4A and Fig. S7B). Moreover, CD2–Gata3 Tg ILC2s showed higher surface expression of IL-25R and IL-33R (Fig. S7C).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

ILC2 development and function correlates with Gata3 gene copy number. (A) Identification of ILC2s in BM of mice with different Gata3 gene copy number, as indicated (Upper). (Lower) Shown is quantification of the total numbers of ILC2s and IL-5+ and IL-13+ ILC2s in lung and BM of the indicated mouse strains. Significance levels indicate comparison of the indicated strain with C57BL/6. Shown are representative results from four independent experiments with n ≥ 8 total mice analyzed per genotype. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (B) Identification of common lymphoid precursors (CLP) in BM of WT and CD2–Gata3 Tg mice. Expression of GATA-3 in both mouse strains is shown as a histogram, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean intensity ± SEM. Representative sample from three independent experiments is shown. (C) GFP expression in BM CLPs of CD2–GFP Tg mice. Analysis of a nontransgenic age-matched control mouse is shown and used to determine background GFP levels. Representative results from two independent experiments are shown. (D) Single CLPs (Lin− CD127+ CD117low Sca1low CD135+) from mice with various Gata3 copy number were sorted and cocultured with OP9Δ4 stroma in the presence of IL-7 and -33 for 14–18 d and analyzed for ILC2 development. Plots show identification of ILC2s based on the indicated markers among Lin− CD127+ CD44+ CD25+ lymphocytes. Shown is one representative sample from three independent experiments with n ≥ 144 individual cultures per genotype tested in total.

These results suggest that Gata3 expression levels can modify ILC2 generation from hematopoietic precursors and thereby influence ILC2 homeostasis. Whereas absolute numbers of CLPs were normal in CD2–Gata3 Tg mice, we found that Gata3 levels in CLPs were modestly but significantly increased in CLPs in CD2–Gata3 Tg mice compared with nontransgenic controls (Fig. 4B). This finding would be consistent with hCD2 Tg control elements being active in CLPs, a hypothesis that we confirmed using CD2–GFP mice (37) (Fig. 4C). To assess the influence of increased Gata3 levels in determining ILC2 potential from CLPs, we analyzed expression of ILC2-related genes (Rora, Id2, Il17rb, and Il1rl1) in CLPs from WT and CD2–Gata3 Tg mice. Whereas Gata3 expression was threefold increased, the levels of other ILC2-related genes were unaffected (Table S1). We next cultured single CLPs from Gata3lacZ/+, Gata3+/+, or CD2–Gata3 Tg mice on stromal cells in the presence of IL-7 and -33. ILC2s developed from Gata3+/+ CLPs at the expected frequency (f = 1/5) (19), whereas CD2–Gata3 Tg CLPs were almost twice as efficient in generating ILC2s (f = 1/2.6). In contrast, Gata3lacZ/+ CLPs showed a 2.6-fold reduction in ILC2 potential (f = 1/13) compared with their WT counterparts (Table 1, Fig. 4D, and Fig. S8). Collectively, these results suggest a model in which Gata3 levels in CLPs control initial commitment to the ILC2 lineage and confirm the important role for sustained Gata3 expression in maintenance of type 2 cytokine secretion from mature ILC2s (24).

Table 1.

ILC2 fate decision from CLPs positively correlates with Gata3 copy number

Genotype Frequency, 1/x 95% CI χ2 (P) vs. WT
Gata3lacZ/+ 12.99 7.92–21.31 13.8 (<0.001)
C57BL/6 4.95 3.82–6.43 n/a
CD2–Gata3 Tg 2.63 2.05–3.38 12.4 (<0.001)

ILC2 containing cultures 1 CLP → OP9Δ4 + IL-7 + IL-33 (14–18 d). Single CLPs were cultured as described in Fig. 4 and analyzed for ILC2 development. Frequencies and 95% confidence interval are shown. Data from three pooled, independent experiments are shown. Frequencies were calculated by using an Extreme Limiting Dilution Assay. Statistical significance of differences between groups was determined by using a χ2 test. χ2 test for differences between any of the groups: χ2 = 42.4 (P = 6.09 × 10−10). n/a, not applicable.

Concluding Remarks

Little is known about the mechanisms by which Gata3 promotes T or ILC2 specification in lymphocyte precursors. In contrast, Gata3 acts to direct cytokine production in differentiating Th2 cells (and by analogy in ILC2s) by binding directly to Il4, Il5, and Il13 promoters and the Th2 locus control region (38, 39) and through regulation of IL-33R expression (23, 24). Gata3 regulates Ifng expression through addition of H3K27me3 suppressive marks (40). Gata3 may promote early stages of T and ILC2 development through simultaneous gene activation and gene repression in a fashion similar to Gata1 (reviewed in ref. 41). Gata3-mediated gene regulation works in a context-dependent fashion that is strongly influenced by transcription factor coexpression. Specific targets of Gata3 in developing lymphocyte precursors are poorly defined. A recent analysis of Gata3-binding sites in early thymocyte progenitors (27) identified ROR-α as a Gata3 target potentially involved in T-cell specification. Because ROR-α is critical for ILC2 homeostasis (17, 34), it is possible that Gata3-mediated activation of ROR-α provides a mechanism to promote early ILC2 development. Indeed, analysis of FL cultures showed that in the absence of Gata3, Rora expression was not induced (Fig. S5).

Among transcriptional activators, transient Notch signaling appears required for ILC2 and ILC3 development from lymphoid progenitors (16–18). The role for Notch in this process is not understood but could involve transient up-regulation of Gata3 or ROR-γt that are essential for ILC2 and ILC3 generation, respectively. Sustained Notch signaling, however, seems detrimental to ILC2 and ILC3 development, because neither of these ILC subsets is generated to any appreciable degree within the thymus. One possible model is that common or dedicated ILC precursors are generated in adult mice in the BM following transient Notch triggering of CLPs; this process may be important for Gata3 up-regulation in CLPs that generates precursors with ILC2 potential. In CD2–Gata3 transgenic mice, these precursors might accumulate as the initiating event in ILC2 specification (Gata3 up-regulation) that is enforced in the BM. In contrast, in vivo overexpression of Gata3 in the presence of Notch signaling, in fetal thymocytes at the DN1 or DN2 stage, induced their redirection into the mast cell lineage in vivo (42). Although evidence for direct action of Notch at the Gata3 locus in lymphoid precursors is lacking, this mechanism has been amply demonstrated in Th2 cell differentiation (43, 44).

Recent studies reported on the role of GATA-3 in mouse and human ILC2s (45, 46). Mjösberg et al. (45) showed that GATA-3 is crucial for function of human ILC2s and that thymic stromal cell-derived lymphopoietin through activation of STAT5 can induce GATA-3 expression leading to cytokine production. Hoyler et al. (46) used an inducible Gata3 ablation strategy in mice to show that intestinal ILC2 development and homeostasis require constitutive Gata3 expression. Our results provide independent evidence that Gata3 is essential for development of intestinal as well as pulmonary ILC2s (5–9). Moreover, because our analysis involved generation of hematopoietic chimeras in hosts devoid of endogenous ILC2s (2, 3), we can conclude that Gata3 is strictly required for ILC2 development as we exclude the possibility that absence of Gata3-deficient ILC2s results from growth disadvantage compared with Gata3-proficient cells. Importantly, we demonstrate that Gata3 acts in a cell-intrinsic and dose-dependent fashion in vivo and in vitro to induce ILC2 development from isolated CLPs; Gata3 gene copy number directly correlated with subsequent ILC2 numbers and cytokine production capacity. This finding suggests that Gata3 expression levels in CLPs are decisive for induction of ILC2 fate.

Together, our results extend the understanding of the roles of GATA-3 in ILC2 development and function. We demonstrate a critical cell-intrinsic and dose-dependent role for Gata3 in early ILC2 development that mirrors the role played by this transcription factor in early T-cell development in the thymus (25, 26). These observations provide another example of the remarkable similarities between the molecular mechanisms that regulate the differentiation of innate and adaptive lymphocytes (13).

Materials and Methods

Mice and Generation of Chimeric Mice.

Rag2–Il2rg double-deficient on the C57BL/6 background, Cd3e-deficient, Gata3–lacZ, CD2–Gata3, and CD2–GFP Tg mice were maintained at the animal facilities of the Institut Pasteur, Erasmus University Medical Center, and the Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa. C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c Rag2–Il2rg mice were obtained from Harlan and Charles River, respectively. Mice were analyzed at 8–16 wk of age. Five-gray–irradiated Rag2–Il2rg double-deficient animals as hosts for hematopoietic stem cell grafts and were analyzed 5–10 wk after transplantation. All animals were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions and provided with food and water ad libitum. All experiments were approved and performed in accordance with local regulations (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Institut Pasteur, Paris).

IL-25 and -33 Administration.

For IL-25–induced inflammation, mice received 2.5 µg of recombinant mouse IL-25 (BioLegend) in PBS for four subsequent days intraperitoneally (33). Three doses of 1 µg of recombinant mouse IL-33 (BioLegend) in PBS were administered i.n. to anesthetized mice to induce eosinophilic airway inflammation (9).

Phenotypic and Functional Analysis.

Lamina propria lymphocytes from small intestine were isolated as described (47). Single-cell suspensions from lungs, BAL, spleen, LNs, and BM were prepared and analyzed by FACS as described (9). CLPs (Lin−CD117lowSca1lowCD135+) were sorted from WT and CD2–Gata3 Tg mice for quantitative PCR analysis. Antibodies used for analysis of cell surface phenotype, intracellular cytokines, and transcription factors are described in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

R.G.J.K.W. is supported by a scholarship from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer France. This work was supported by grants from the Institut Pasteur, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Ligue National Contre le Cancer, and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (to J.P.D.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1217158110/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Hurst SD, et al. New IL-17 family members promote Th1 or Th2 responses in the lung: In vivo function of the novel cytokine IL-25. J Immunol. 2002;169(1):443–453. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Price AE, et al. Systemically dispersed innate IL-13-expressing cells in type 2 immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(25):11489–11494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003988107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moro K, et al. Innate production of T(H)2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit(+)Sca-1(+) lymphoid cells. Nature. 2010;463(7280):540–544. doi: 10.1038/nature08636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Neill DR, et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1367–1370. doi: 10.1038/nature08900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Monticelli LA, et al. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(11):1045–1054. doi: 10.1031/ni.2131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang Y-J, et al. Innate lymphoid cells mediate influenza-induced airway hyper-reactivity independently of adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(7):631–638. doi: 10.1038/ni.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim HY, et al. Innate lymphoid cells responding to IL-33 mediate airway hyperreactivity independently of adaptive immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(1):216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barlow JL, et al. Innate IL-13–producing nuocytes arise during allergic lung inflammation and contribute to airways hyperreactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(1):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klein Wolterink RGJ, et al. Pulmonary innate lymphoid cells are major producers of IL-5 and IL-13 in murine models of allergic asthma. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(5):1106–1116. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Halim TYF, Krauss RH, Sun AC, Takei F. Lung natural helper cells are a critical source of Th2 cell-type cytokines in protease allergen-induced airway inflammation. Immunity. 2012;36(3):451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mjösberg JM, et al. Human IL-25- and IL-33-responsive type 2 innate lymphoid cells are defined by expression of CRTH2 and CD161. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(11):1055–1062. doi: 10.1038/ni.2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bartemes KR, et al. IL-33-responsive lineage- CD25+ CD44(hi) lymphoid cells mediate innate type 2 immunity and allergic inflammation in the lungs. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1503–1513. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spits H, Di Santo JP. The expanding family of innate lymphoid cells: Regulators and effectors of immunity and tissue remodeling. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):21–27. doi: 10.1038/ni.1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Spits H, et al. Innate lymphoid cells—a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(2):145–149. doi: 10.1038/nri3365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Possot C, et al. Notch signaling is necessary for adult, but not fetal, development of RORγt(+) innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(10):949–958. doi: 10.1038/ni.2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cherrier M, Sawa S, Eberl G. Notch, Id2, and RORγt sequentially orchestrate the fetal development of lymphoid tissue inducer cells. J Exp Med. 2012;209(4):729–740. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong SH, et al. Transcription factor RORα is critical for nuocyte development. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(3):229–236. doi: 10.1038/ni.2208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee JS, et al. AHR drives the development of gut ILC22 cells and postnatal lymphoid tissues via pathways dependent on and independent of Notch. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(2):144–151. doi: 10.1038/ni.2187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sawa S, et al. Lineage relationship analysis of RORgammat+ innate lymphoid cells. Science. 2010;330(6004):665–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1194597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zheng W, Flavell RA. The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 T cells. Cell. 1997;89(4):587–596. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80240-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang D-H, Cohn L, Ray P, Bottomly K, Ray A. Transcription factor GATA-3 is differentially expressed in murine Th1 and Th2 cells and controls Th2-specific expression of the interleukin-5 gene. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(34):21597–21603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ansel KM, Djuretic I, Tanasa B, Rao A. Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:607–656. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu J, et al. Conditional deletion of Gata3 shows its essential function in T(H)1-T(H)2 responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(11):1157–1165. doi: 10.1038/ni1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liang H-E, et al. Divergent expression patterns of IL-4 and IL-13 define unique functions in allergic immunity. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(1):58–66. doi: 10.1038/ni.2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klein Wolterink RGJ, García-Ojeda ME, Vosshenrich CAJ, Hendriks RW, Di Santo JP. The intrathymic crossroads of T and NK cell differentiation. Immunol Rev. 2010;238(1):126–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rothenberg EV, Zhang J, Li L. Multilayered specification of the T-cell lineage fate. Immunol Rev. 2010;238(1):150–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang JA, Mortazavi A, Williams BA, Wold BJ, Rothenberg EV. Dynamic transformations of genome-wide epigenetic marking and transcriptional control establish T cell identity. Cell. 2012;149(2):467–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Samson SI, et al. GATA-3 promotes maturation, IFN-gamma production, and liver-specific homing of NK cells. Immunity. 2003;19(5):701–711. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vosshenrich CAJ, et al. A thymic pathway of mouse natural killer cell development characterized by expression of GATA-3 and CD127. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(11):1217–1224. doi: 10.1038/ni1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ting C-N, Olson MC, Barton KP, Leiden JM. Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage. Nature. 1996;384(6608):474–478. doi: 10.1038/384474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brickshawana A, Shapiro VS, Kita H, Pease LR. Lineage(-)Sca1+c-Kit(-)CD25+ cells are IL-33-responsive type 2 innate cells in the mouse bone marrow. J Immunol. 2011;187(11):5795–5804. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kondo Y, et al. Administration of IL-33 induces airway hyperresponsiveness and goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs in the absence of adaptive immune system. Int Immunol. 2008;20(6):791–800. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fort MM, et al. IL-25 induces IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and Th2-associated pathologies in vivo. Immunity. 2001;15(6):985–995. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Halim TYF, et al. Retinoic-acid-receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor alpha is required for natural helper cell development and allergic inflammation. Immunity. 2012;37(3):463–474. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hendriks RW, et al. Expression of the transcription factor GATA-3 is required for the development of the earliest T cell progenitors and correlates with stages of cellular proliferation in the thymus. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29(6):1912–1918. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199906)29:06<1912::AID-IMMU1912>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nawijn MC, et al. Enforced expression of GATA-3 during T cell development inhibits maturation of CD8 single-positive cells and induces thymic lymphoma in transgenic mice. J Immunol. 2001;167(2):715–723. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Veiga-Fernandes H, et al. Tyrosine kinase receptor RET is a key regulator of Peyer’s patch organogenesis. Nature. 2007;446(7135):547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature05597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yagi R, Zhu J, Paul WE. An updated view on transcription factor GATA3-mediated regulation of Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation. Int Immunol. 2011;23(7):415–420. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxr029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee GR, Fields PE, Griffin TJ, Flavell RA. Regulation of the Th2 cytokine locus by a locus control region. Immunity. 2003;19(1):145–153. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wei G, et al. Genome-wide analyses of transcription factor GATA3-mediated gene regulation in distinct T cell types. Immunity. 2011;35(2):299–311. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bresnick EH, Katsumura KR, Lee H-Y, Johnson KD, Perkins AS. Master regulatory GATA transcription factors: Mechanistic principles and emerging links to hematologic malignancies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(13):5819–5831. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taghon T, Yui MA, Rothenberg EV. Mast cell lineage diversion of T lineage precursors by the essential T cell transcription factor GATA-3. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(8):845–855. doi: 10.1038/ni1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Amsen D, et al. Direct regulation of Gata3 expression determines the T helper differentiation potential of Notch. Immunity. 2007;27(1):89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fang TC, et al. Notch directly regulates Gata3 expression during T helper 2 cell differentiation. Immunity. 2007;27(1):100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mjösberg J, et al. The transcription factor GATA3 is essential for the function of human type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2012;37(4):649–659. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hoyler T, et al. The transcription factor GATA-3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2012;37(4):634–648. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Satoh-Takayama N, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 independently program the differentiation of intestinal CD3-NKp46+ cell subsets from Id2-dependent precursors. J Exp Med. 2010;207(2):273–280. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES