Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2006 Mar 28;65(12):1545–1550. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.035295

Antiendothelial cell antibodies in vasculitis and connective tissue disease

C Belizna 1,2,3, A Duijvestijn 1,2,3, M Hamidou 1,2,3, J W Cohen Tervaert 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1798473  PMID: 16569688

Abstract

Antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECA) are a heterogeneous family of antibodies reacting with endothelial cell antigens. These antibodies are found in various diseases and recognise several antigen determinants. Different pathophysiological effects have been observed in in vitro experiments, which include direct or indirect cytotoxicity and endothelial cell apoptosis. Furthermore, some AECA activate endothelial cells, resulting in increased leucocyte adhesiveness, activation of coagulation and vascular thrombosis. In animal models, it has been shown that AECA could promote vascular damage. Neither the endothelial cell antigens nor their precise role in the pathogenecity of different diseases in which AECA are found is well characterised. Nowadays, it is not known whether AECA are an epiphenomenon accompanying vascular injury or whether they are pathogenic. It is controversial whether fluctuations in AECA titres are associated with disease activity during follow‐up studies. This review summarises the present knowledge about AECA, AECA antigens and their potential role in the pathogenecity of vasculitis and connective tissue diseases.

The vascular endothelium has a pivotal position.1 Antiendothelial antibodies (AECA) recognise a wide variety of antigens.2 Their presence has been reported in connective tissue diseases, vasculitides and other inflammatory diseases (reviewed by Belizna et al3). The target antigens in these diseases are usually different and AECA possibly have several effects in vivo, explaining their complexity and heterogeneity.4 Although first described more than three decades ago,5 their pathophysiological role is still not completely understood, owing to the lack of precise characterisation of putative targets. Moreover, it is not established at what moment during vascular damage these antibodies are generated and whether they cause vascular dysfunction in vivo. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence for the clinical importance and possible pathogenic role of AECA. They may interfere and control several endothelial cell functions, and therefore be a driving mechanism for vascular injury. This review discusses their role. Do AECA have a pathogenic role? Are they only “on the backstage” on the vasculitis theatre? Are they a marker of disease activity? This review summarises the present knowledge in this field, and discusses the progress made in the debate about their potential pathogenic role.

AECA detection

AECA are usually detected by ELISA using cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) as substrate.3,6,7 Generally, confluent endothelial cell monolayers are fixed before testing to avoid non‐specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G binding and loss of cells. Fixation, however, induces permeabilisation of endothelial cell membranes and part of the AECA reactivity could be due to reaction with intracellular compounds. To avoid these artefacts, several groups use ELISAs with unfixed endothelial cells.3 Moreover, other techniques are used, such as immunofluorescence, radioimmunoassays, fluorescence‐activated cell sorting, immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody‐dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC).3 Furthermore, endothelial cells other than HUVEC are sometimes used, such as cell membrane extracts, cells from renal or medullar microvessels, and cell lines.8,9 Each method and each substrate has a certain degree of specificity and sensitivity, and its own advantages and disadvantages. One perturbing element when comparing these tests is the variation between results, probably due to the modalities of antigenic preparations.10 Erroneous reporting of negative AECA may be owing to the lack of expression of certain target antigens on a specific substrate. Renaudineau et al2 suggested the use of several endothelial cell substrates simultaneously to eliminate false‐negative results.2

Heterophilic antibodies could sometimes be detected. Therefore, false‐positive AECA could be reported owing to endogenous antibodies reacting with fetal calf serum (FCS) proteins from culture medium coated on ELISA plates. These results could be avoided by antibody absorption in FCS‐containing dilution buffer or by washing cells free of FCS before plating.11

Until now, to our knowledge, no standardised test or substrate exists for AECA detection, but concentrated efforts are currently being made.

Pathogenic effects

Direct cytotoxicity of AECA was reported only in few diseases. AECA could exert their pathogenic role either via CDC in patients with Kawasaki disease, or via ADCC mechanisms in those with Wegener granulomatosis or with microscopic polyangeitis.3

However, these data have not been confirmed.12 In Takayasu's arteritis, some authors suggest that AECA are responsible for CDC.13

In 12 patients with Takayasu's arteritis, no sera showed ADCC at any of the effector:target ratios tested.13,14 Furthermore, this ratio was too high, suggesting a minor contribution of this mechanism during vascular injury in vivo. Rather than exerting a direct cytotoxicity, AECA could be pathogenic in vasculitis by activating endothelial cells, triggering the leucocyte adhesion to endothelial surfaces and cytokine production. However, recent experimental data suggest other AECA pathogenic mechanisms (fig 1).

graphic file with name ar35295.f1.jpg

Figure 1 Pathogenic mechanisms for antiendothelial cell antibodies. ADCC, antibody‐dependent cytotoxicity; β2‐GPI, β2‐glycoprotein I; CDC, complement‐dependent cytotoxicity; EC, endothelial cell; PL, phospholipid.

Open in a new tab

Activation of endothelial cells

Incubation with AECA from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is followed by changes in expression of endothelial adhesion molecules such as E‐selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and changes in the profile of cytokine secretion, with the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)1 and tumour necrosis factor TNF α). This endothelial cell activation is dose dependent, as shown by in vitro incubation with serial AECA concentrations.15 Additional information comes from data showing the induction of a pro‐inflammatory endothelial phenotype when endothelial cells are incubated with human monoclonal AECA from a patient with SLE.16 Endothelial cell activation is partially regulated by autocrine or paracrine actions of cytokines (IL 1).17 The signal transduction pathway in the expression of adhesion molecules induced by AECA seems to be via the mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascade, but not exclusively.18 Therefore, endothelial cell activation seems to be mediated through nuclear factor κB pathway and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase–mitogen‐activated protein kinases in response to TNF α.19,20 Interestingly, endothelial cell activation mediated by anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I (β2‐GPI) antibody can be inhibited by statins. The capacity of these drugs to down regulate the expression of adhesion molecules suggests their possible use in various pathologies in which endothelial cell activation seems pathogenic.21

Induction of coagulation

Under physiological conditions, endothelial cells possess anticoagulant properties. Some AECA are responsible for the synthesis of tissue factor, the physiological initiator of coagulation. It has been found that after exposure to sera from patients with SLE, HUVEC produced high amounts of tissue factor.22

Moreover, when monoclonal AECA and anti‐β2‐GPI antibodies derived from patients with Takayasu's arteritis and antiphospholipid syndrome were incubated with endothelial cells, they induced tissue factor production. Furthermore, tissue factor activity, tissue factor antigen and tissue factor mRNA were dose dependent on AECA titres.23 Tissue factor activity was also time dependent; it was elicited by F(ab)2 fragments and completely disappeared when incubated with anti‐tissue factor antibodies.

β2‐GPI can adhere to endothelial cells. The autoantibody binding activates a signalling pathway responsible for the translocation of nuclear factor κB from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and the activation of genes for up regulation of the adhesion molecule, pro‐inflammatory cytokine and tissue factor.

Furthermore, the antiphospholipid antibodies interfere with the binding of annexin V, synthesis of endothelin I, induction of apoptosis and the protein containment/surveillance system.24 Some studies have shown an association between antiphospholipid antibodies and low levels of free protein S,25 and β2‐GPI interferes with the binding of protein S to its plasma inhibitor.26

Altogether, these effects contribute to a pro‐inflammatory and pro‐coagulant endothelial phenotype. Since the description of antiheparin antibodies (AHA), much progress has been made to show how AECA induce a change in coagulant properties of endothelial cells. AHA have been reported in autoimmune diseases and their action has been reproduced in animal models. In endothelial cells, heparin sulphate represents the major glycosaminoglycan. AHA exert CDC on endothelial cells and form immune complexes with heparin. AECA binding to endothelial cells is followed by the cleavage and release of heparan sulphate on the endothelial cell surface, inducing pro‐inflammatory and pro‐coagulant consequences or apoptosis. This effect is specific for AECA, as elution studies failed to show inhibition with cardiolipin, anti‐DNA, hyaluronate or chondroitine sulphate.2 AHA are found in patients with SLE and correlate with renal and neurological disease. Furthermore, immunisation with glycosaminoglycan is followed by a systemic sclerosis (SSc)‐like disease.27 As AHA correlate with AECA activity, these antibodies could be considered to be part of the AECA repertoire.28 Furthermore, it has been shown that autoantibodies to heparan sulphate may contribute to vascular injury via CDC mechanisms in MRL/lpr/lpr mice;29 yet, the target antigens for AECA and AHA are incompletely characterised. Their molecular weight varies between 20 and 200 kDa. Recently, the use of a monoclonal AECA to inhibit heparin binding to endothelial cells enabled the identification of a putative endothelial heparin receptor (a 45 000‐M(r) heparin‐binding polypeptide).30

Apoptosis

Rather than exerting a direct cytotoxic effect, some AECA may induce endothelial cell apoptosis. Therefore, some authors reported apoptosis after incubation of human endothelial cells with AECA from patients with SSc. This phenomenon was inhibited by an anti‐Fas ligand antibody, suggesting that apoptosis in SSc is mediated through CD95 (Fas).31 Adversely, some other authors report Fas‐independent apoptosis.32

If in vitro studies have suggested the AECA's role in mediating endothelial cell apoptosis, recent data led to suppose the same effects in vivo. Therefore, the injection of AECA‐positive serum samples in normal chicken embryos from University of California at Davis line 200 chickens spontaneously developing a scleroderma‐like disease was followed by an increased endothelial cell apoptosis.33 AECA are often associated with antibodies to anionic phospholipids such as the phosphatidylserine. AECA and antiphospholipid (APL) antibodies seem to be different species of antibodies, although they may cross react.8 Anticardiolipin antibodies may behave as AECA, as absorption on to endothelial cells resulted not only in inhibition of AECA activity but also considerably reduced binding of anticardiolipin antibodies. In contrast, AECA binding could not be inhibited by incubation with cardiolipin.34 However, AECA activity is partially related to APL. Hence, the incubation of endothelial cells with AECA is followed by the translocation of phosphatidylserine with the exposure of phosphatidylserine on the outer face of the endothelial cell membrane, followed by apoptosis.

APL antibodies recognise and activate endothelial cells.8,35 They do not recognise anionic phospholipids, but plasma proteins bound to anionic surfaces such as β2‐GPI and prothrombin. Therefore, APL antibodies react with endothelial cells, mainly by reacting with β2‐GPI on the cell surface. β2‐GPI can adhere to endothelial cells via the annexin II receptor and negatively charged structures (heparin‐like molecules) bound by the phospholipid‐binding site of the molecule. Furthermore, a subset of APL antibodies recognises annexin V and induces endothelial cell apoptosis.36 Adhesion of β2‐GPI to endothelial cells offers suitable epitopes for circulating APL antibodies that can induce endothelial cell activation.37,38,39 Moreover, a new antigen in patients with SLE—namely, heat‐shock protein 60 (Hsp60)—is the target for anti‐Hsp60 antibodies that bind to endothelial cells and induce phosphatidylserine exposure, followed by apoptosis, thus providing a target for anti‐phosphatidylserine.40

The incubation of human endothelial cells with APLs is followed by production of tissue factors and up regulation of adhesion molecules. Cell activation is associated with translocation of nuclear factor kappa B and with a signalling cascade similar to that triggered by the toll‐like receptors.41

This activation seems to be mediated by β2‐GPI and incriminated in the adhesion of the leucocytes to the vessel wall.

However, ex vivo analysis of several parameters of endothelial cell dysfunction suggests that APLs alone could not be responsible for endothelial cell perturbation, and support a two‐hit pathogenic hypothesis.42

Antigen characterisation

AECA are generally not specific for endothelial cells.3 Endothelial cell‐specific antigens for AECA are found only in a few cases, such as in patients with Kawasaki disease.14 Antigens recognised by AECA include constitutively expressed or cytokine‐induced cryptic antigens, as well as adherent molecules.3 As expected, various antigens are found when several types of substrates are used. Although not a major antigen determinant for AECA, human leucocyte antigen class I determinants are also endothelial cell antigens. A 25% reduction in AECA binding was reported after serum samples from patients with systemic vasculitides were incubated with a crude extract of extracellular matrix components.43 Extracellular matrix components may also be target antigens for AECA, such as collagen types II, IV and VII, vimentin or laminin.3,43 Antilaminin antibodies were reported in patients with SSc and in those with primary Raynaud's phenomenon, whereas antivimentin antibodies were found in patients with SLE.3 Human leucocyte antigen class II determinants, present only on activated endothelial cells, could also be target antigens for AECA. In patients with Kawasaki disease, however, they are not major antigenic determinants.3,14

Proteinase 3 could represent another potential cryptic target antigen. Mayet and Meyer zum Buschenfelde44 have shown that ANCA recognise proteinase 3 translocated into the endothelial cell membrane; but this finding could not be reproduced by others.45 Several molecules could bind to endothelial cells and become so‐called planted target antigens for AECA via presumed charge‐mediated mechanisms, a DNA–histone bridge or a specific receptor. Examples are myeloperoxidase, DNA or β2‐GPI,3 which might adhere to endothelial cells during incubation of endothelial cells with sera of patients. Subsequently, positive AECA are reported, but in reality anti‐myeloperoxidase, anti‐DNA or anti‐β2‐GPI antibodies are detected.

Moreover, β2‐GPI could also be produced by the endothelium itself, or it could be a bovine β2‐GPI from the medium used when testing AECA.46

DNA represents a planted or constitutively expressed antigen for AECA.47 A strong association was reported between AECA and anti‐DNA antibodies in patients with SLE.3 Chan et al47 showed that this binding was partially caused by DNA–anti‐DNA immune complex binding, and enhanced by histones. It was also shown that the binding of monoclonal anti‐DNA antibodies to HUVEC was reduced by 20%, owing to treatment of HUVEC with deoxyribonuclease, suggesting presence of DNA on the endothelial cell surface.47 Finally, some AECA recognise antigens exclusively present in microvascular but not in macrovascular endothelial cells.48 Several phenotypic and functional differences are noticed between endothelial cell antigens from microvascular and macrovascular sites.49 Differences in their nutritional requirements and responses to growth and migration stimuli are also reported.50 In light of these findings, the use of endothelial cells from vessels of different sizes seems to be indicated during AECA assays.

Regarding scleroderma, two antigens were described—namely, a 95–100‐kDa doublet and thrombomodulin.51 In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a 44‐kDa antigen was described, which was no more found with the disappearance of clinical vasculitis.52 In patients with Kawasaki disease, the antigens are not well characterised, but some cytokine‐inducible epitopes may be important. AECA binding was detected by ELISA on both unstimulated and cytokine‐treated endothelial cells.53 In patients with Wegener granulomatosis, protein bands of 25, 68, 125, 155 and 180 kDa were detected.54 It is not established whether proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase are also endothelial cell epitopes for AECA. Also, in patients with SLE, different groups reported antigens with molecular weights ranging from 15 to 200 kDa.3

Recently, IgG AECA from patients with SLE have shown a shared reactivity to a 60‐kDa endothelial cell surface polypeptide, the human Hsp60, responsible for endothelial cell apoptosis.41 Much progress with respect to the identification of the target antigens for AECA has been brought about by new techniques (proteomics), one of which is the construction of expression libraries of complementary DNA to messenger RNA extracted from endothelial cells and transfected into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells; the obtained sequences are compared with those of the genes from the data bank.55

Molecular cloning strategy enabled the identification of a novel panel of candidate endothelial autoantigens in patients with SLE. After detecting AECA by ELISA, western blotting was carried out on samples from two patients and a HUVEC cDNA expression library was screened with their sera for identifying the autoantigens. Among them, the endothelial cell‐specific plasminogen activator inhibitor, ribosomal P protein P0, ribosomal protein L6, elongation factor 1α, adenylcyclase‐associated protein, DNA replication licensing factor, profilin II, and human endothelial‐associated lupus autoantigens 1 and 255 were autoantigens. In one of the two patients with SLE, antibodies to ribosomal P protein were predominant. Furthermore, levels of these antibodies directly correlated with AECA levels and clinical scores. Correlations between specific antibodies recognising defined antigens with clinical manifestations were described in patients with SLE.44,46,52,54,56 Another recent technique, two‐dimensional electrophoresis, is also promising. When combined with western blot analysis using protein extracts from a hybridoma cell line, it enabled the identification of antigens such as calreticulin, tubulin, vimentin and Hsp70.57

Animal models

Animal models further supported the pathogenic role of AECA. In 1988, Matsuda58 immunised guinea pigs with cultured endothelial cell membrane products and found high AECA titres, resulting in proliferative changes in the mesangial matrix and proteinuria. Injection of antibodies to endothelial cell antigens, such as angiotensin‐converting enzyme or factor von Willebrand, promoted experimental lung or renal injury.59 An idiotypic experimental model was created by Damianovitch.60 The active immunisation of BALB/c mice with AECA from a patient with Wegener granulomatosis triggered the production of mouse AECA and vasculitis, reflecting direct evidence for AECA pathogenicity.60 Finally, it is presumed that xenoantibodies or isoantibodies, reactive with transplantation antigens, may result in severe endothelial cell damage, as has been suggested in experimental models.61,62

Allografts are carried out between members of the same species, and xenografts are carried out between members of different species; rejection is therefore usually expected after a short delay following the grafting (hyperacute rejection) via humoral mechanisms. Several data suggest that a mechanism of the graft damage is related to antibodies against the xenograft endothelium. It seems that AECA activate the classical complement pathway, which promotes endothelial cell activation and hyperacute rejection. In a pig‐to‐rhesus model, techniques for lowering the circulating AECA levels (plasma exchange) permitted a delayed rejection.62 However, recent data suggest that several other mechanisms are associated with hyperacute rejection, and that monitoring of the peripheral antibody responses is required in pig‐to‐primate xenograft recipients.63

AECA and disease activity

A fluctuation of AECA titres with disease activity was reported in patients with systemic vasculitis.64,65 These data, however, could not be confirmed by others.66 Although a temporal relationship between AECA titres and disease relapses has not been shown, AECA may represent a predictive marker for relapse for AECA‐positive patients, but ANCA‐negative patients had an increased risk for the clinical relapse.67,68 In patients with SLE, correlation between AECA and disease activity suggests that AECA are markers of disease activity, as was also shown for anti‐DNA antibodies.69,70 AECA may be markers of disease severity as well. Therefore, high AECA prevalence has been associated with vascular lesions, kidney involvement, anticardiolipin antibodies, thrombosis71,72 and pulmonary hypertension.73 Furthermore, correlations between AECA recognising defined antigens with clinical manifestations were reported.74

However, data from a study conducted on 48 patients are rather contradictory.75 Therefore, when evaluating different biological parameters to distinguish the quiescent and active phases of lupus nephritis, no correlation between AECA titres and disease was found. In SSc, AECA are more often found in patients with complications such as digital ischaemia, pulmonary hypertension76 and alveolocapillary dysfunction.77 AECA are closely correlated with pulmonary fibrosis78 and vasculitis,79 and AECA testing can identify subsets of patients with SSc with different prognoses.80 In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, AECA levels are higher in patients with renal or neurological complications.56,81 Vasculitis lesions are correlated with high AECA titres in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in those with Kawasaki disease.79

Conclusion

Several findings raise the possibility that AECA might be pathogenic in connective tissue disease and vasculitis. Moreover, some studies suggest that AECA may be useful markers for disease activity. However, further study is needed to clarify their clinicopathological significance.

Abbreviations

ADCC - antibody‐dependent cytotoxicity

AECA - antiendothelial cell antibodies

AHA - antiheparin antibodies

APL - antiphospholipid

β2‐GPI - β2‐glycoprotein I

CDC - complement‐dependent cytotoxicity

FCS - fetal calf serum

Hsp - heat‐shock protein

HUVEC - human umbilical vein endothelial cells

SLE - systemic lupus erythematosus

SSc - systemic sclerosis

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Schoen F J. Blood vessels. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL, eds. Robbins pathologic basis of disease. 6th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2000467–516.
  • 2.Renaudineau Y, Grunebaum E, Krause I, Praprotnik S, Revelen R, Youinou P. Anti‐endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) in systemic sclerosis—increased sensitivity using different endothelial cell substrates and association with other autoantibodies. Autoimmunity 200133171–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Belizna C, Cohen‐Tervaert J W. Specificity, pathogenecity, and clinical value of antiendothelial cell antibodies. Semin Arthritis Rheum 19972798–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bordron A, Revelen R, D'Arbonneau F, Dueymes M, Renaudineau Y, Jamin C.et al Functional heterogeneity of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 2001124492–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Linquist K J, Osterland C K. Human antibodies to vascular endothelium. Clin Exp Immunol 19719753–760. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cines D B, Lyss A P, Reeber M, Bina M, DeHoratius R J. Presence of complement‐fixing anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 198473611–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosenbaum J, Pottinger B E, Woo P, Black C M, Loizou S, Byron M A.et al Measurement and characterisation of circulating anti‐endothelial cell IgG in connective tissue diseases. Clin Exp Immunol 198872450–456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsuda J, Gotoh M, Gohchi K, Kawasugi K, Tsukamoto M, Saitoh N. Anti‐endothelial cell antibodies to the endothelial hybridoma cell line (EAhy926) in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Br J Haematol 199797227–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Leeuwen E B, Wisman G B, Tervaert J W, Palmans L L, van Wijk R T, Veenstra R.et al An SV40 large T‐antigen immortalized human umbilical vein endothelial cell line for anti‐endothelial cell antibody detection. Clin Exp Rheumatol 200119283–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Revelen R, D'Arbonneau F, Guillevin L, Bordron A, Youinou P, Dueymes M. Comparison of cell‐ELISA, flow cytometry and Western blotting for the detection of antiendothelial cell antibodies. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20022019–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Revelen R, Bordron A, Dueymes M, Youinou P, Arvieux J. False positivity in a cyto‐ELISA for anti‐endothelial cell antibodies caused by heterophile antibodies to bovine serum proteins. Clin Chem 200046273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Del Papa N, Guidali L, Sironi M, Shoenfeld Y, Mantovani A, Tincani A.et al Anti‐endothelial cell IgG antibodies from patients with Wegener's granulomatosis bind to human endothelial cells in vitro and induce adhesion molecule expression and cytokine secretion. Arthritis Rheum 199639758–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tripathy N K, Upadhyaya S, Sinha N, Nityanand S. Complement and cell mediated cytotoxicity by antiendothelial cell antibodies in Takayasu's arteritis. J Rheumatol 200128805–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leung D Y, Collins T, Lapierre L A, Geha R S, Pober J S. Immunoglobulin M antibodies present in the acute phase of Kawasaki syndrome lyse cultured vascular endothelial cells stimulated by gamma interferon. J Clin Invest 1986771428–1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Del Papa N D, Raschi E, Moroni G, Panzeri P, Borghi M O, Ponticelli C.et al Anti‐endothelial cell IgG fractions from systemic lupus erythematosus patients bind to human endothelial cells and induce a pro‐adhesive and a pro‐inflammatory phenotype in vitro. Lupus 19998423–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yazici Z A, Raschi E, Patel A, Testoni C, Borghi M O, Graham A M.et al Human monoclonal anti‐endothelial cell IgG‐derived from a systemic lupus erythematosus patient binds and activates human endothelium in vitro. Int Immunol 200113349–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carvalho D, Savage C O, Isenberg D, Pearson J D. IgG anti‐endothelial cell autoantibodies from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or systemic vasculitis stimulate the release of two endothelial cell‐derived mediators, which enhance adhesion molecule expression and leukocyte adhesion in an autocrine manner. Arthritis Rheum 199942631–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee K H, Cho H J, Kim H S, Lee W J, Lee S, Bang D. Activation of extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells stimulated by anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in sera of patients with Behcet's disease. J Dermatol Sci 20023063–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Min W, Pober J S. TNF initiates E‐selectin transcription in human endothelial cells through parallel TRAF–NF‐kappa B and TRAF–RAC/CDC42–JNK–c‐jun/ATF2 pathways. J Immunol 19971593508–3518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Read M A, Whitley M Z, Gupta S, Pierce J W, Best J, Davis R J.et al Tumor necrosis factor alpha‐induced E‐selectin expression is activated by the nuclear factor kappa B and the c‐JUN N‐terminal kinase/p38 mitogen activated protein kinase pathways. J Biol Chem 19972722753–2761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meroni P L, Raschi E, Testoni C, Tincani A, Balestrieri G, Molteni R.et al Statins prevent endothelial cell activation induced by antiphospholipid anti‐beta2‐glycoprotein I antibodies: effect on the proadhesive and proinflammatory phenotype. Arthritis Rheum 2001442870–2878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tannenbaum S H, Finko R, Cines D B. Antibody and immune complexes induce tissue factor production by human endothelial cells. J Immunol 19861371532–1537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kornberg A, Renaudineau Y, Blank M, Youinou P, Shoenfeld Y. Anti‐beta 2‐glycoprotein I antibodies and anti‐endothelial cell antibodies induce tissue factor in endothelial cells. Isr Med Assoc J 20002(Suppl)27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Groot P G, Horbach D A, Derksen R H. Protein C and other cofactors involved in the binding of antiphospholipid antibodies: relation to the pathogenesis of thrombosis. Lupus 19965488–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tomas J F, Alberca I, Tabernero M D, Cordero M, Del Pino‐Montes J, Vicente V. Natural anticoagulant proteins and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 19982557–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Merrill J T, Zhang H W, Shen C, Butman B T, Jeffries E P, Lahita R G.et al Enhancement of protein S anticoagulant function by beta2‐glycoprotein I, a major target antigen of antiphospholipid antibodies: beta2‐glycoprotein I interferes with binding of protein S to its plasma inhibitor, C4b‐binding protein. Thromb Haemost 199981748–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ishikawa H, Saito Y, Ymakage A, Kitabatake M. Scleroderma‐inducing glycosaminoglycan in the urine of patients with systemic scleroderma. Dermatologica 1978156193–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harper L, Savage C O. Anti‐heparin antibodies: part of the repertoire of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies (AECA). Lupus 1998768–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dimitriu‐Bona A, Matic M, Ding W, Yang C P, Fillit H. Cytotoxicity to endothelial cells by sera from aged MRL/lpr/lpr mice is associated with autoimmunity to cell surface heparan sulfate. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 199576234–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Patton WA I I, Granzow C A, Getts L A, Thomas S C, Zotter L M, Gunzel K A.et al Identification of a heparin‐binding protein using monoclonal antibodies that block heparin binding to porcine aortic endothelial cells. Biochem J 1995311461–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sgonc R, Gruschwitz M S, Boeck G, Sepp N, Gruber J, Wick G. Endothelial cell apoptosis in systemic sclerosis is induced by antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity via CD95. Arthritis Rheum 2000432550–2562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bordron A, Dueymes M, Levy Y, Jamin C, Leroy J P, Piette J C.et al The binding of some human antiendothelial cell antibodies induces endothelial cell apoptosis. J Clin Invest 19981012029–2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Worda M, Sgonc R, Dietrich H, Niederegger H, Sundick R S, Gershwin M E.et al In vivo analysis of the apoptosis‐inducing effect of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic sclerosis by the chorionallantoic membrane assay. Arthritis Rheum 2003482605–2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Le Tonqueze M, Dueymes M, Giovangrandi Y, Beigbeder G, Jouquan J, Pennec Y L.et al The relationship of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies to anti‐phospholipid antibodies in patients with giant cell arteritis and/or polymyalgia rheumatica. Autoimmunity 19952059–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dueymes M, Levy Y, Ziporen L, Jamin C, Piette J C, Shoenfeld Y.et al Do some antiphospholipid antibodies target endothelial cells? Ann Med Interne 1996147(Suppl 1)22–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nakamura N, Shidara Y, Kawaguchi N, Azuma C, Mitsuda N, Onishi S.et al Lupus anticoagulant autoantibody induces apoptosis in umbilical vein endothelial cells: involvement of annexin V. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 19942051488–1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Del Papa N, Guidali L, Spatola L, Bonara P, Borghi M O, Tincani A.et al Relationship between anti‐phospholipid and anti‐endothelial cell antibodies III: beta 2 glycoprotein I mediates the antibody binding to endothelial membranes and induces the expression of adhesion molecules. Clin Exp Rheumatol 199513179–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Del Papa N, Guidali L, Sala A, Buccellati C, Khamashta M A, Ichikawa K.et al Endothelial cells as target for antiphospholipid antibodies. Human polyclonal and monoclonal anti‐beta 2‐glycoprotein I antibodies react in vitro with endothelial cells through adherent beta 2‐glycoprotein I and induce endothelial activation. Arthritis Rheum 199740551–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bordron A, Dueymes M, Levy Y, Jamin C, Ziporen L, Piette J C.et al Anti‐endothelial cell antibody binding makes negatively charged phospholipids accessible to antiphospholipid antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 1998411738–1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dieude M, Senecal J L, Raymond Y. Induction of endothelial cell apoptosis by heat‐shock protein 60‐reactive antibodies from anti‐endothelial cell autoantibody‐positive systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Rheum 2004503221–3231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Meroni P L, Raschi E, Testoni C, Parisio A, Borghi M O. Innate immunity in the antiphospholipid syndrome: role of toll‐like receptors in endothelial cell activation by antiphospholipid antibodies. Autoimmun Rev 20043510–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Meroni P L, Borghi M O, Raschi E, Ventura D, Sarzi Puttini P C, Atzeni F.et al Inflammatory response and the endothelium. Thromb Res 2004114329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Direskeneli H, D'Cruz D, Khamashta A M, Hughes R V. Autoantibodies against endothelial cells, extracellular matrix, and human collagen IV in patients with systemic vasculitis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 199470206–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mayet W J, Meyer zum Buschenfelde K H. Antibodies to proteinase 3 increase adhesion of neutrophils to human endothelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 199394440–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Heeringa P, Cohen Tervaert J W. Pathophysiology of ANCA‐associated vasculitides: are ANCA really pathogenic? Kidney Int 2004651564–1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu M, Olee T, Le D T, Roubey R A, Hahn B H, Woods V L., Jret al Characterization of IgG monoclonal anti‐cardiolipin/anti‐beta2GP1 antibodies from two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome reveals three species of antibodies. Br J Haematol 1999105102–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chan T M, Frampton G, Staines N A, Hobby P, Perry G J, Cameron J S. Different mechanisms by which anti‐DNA MoAbs bind to human endothelial cells and glomerular mesangial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 19928868–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Praprotnik S, Blank M, Meroni P L, Rozman B, Eldor A, Shoenfeld Y. Classification of anti‐ endothelial cell antibodies into antibodies against microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells: the pathogenic and diagnostic implications. Arthritis Rheum 2001441484–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Page C, Rose M, Yacoub M, Pigott R. Antigenic heterogeneity of vascular endothelium. Am J Pathol 1992141673–683. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zetter B R. The endothelial cells of large and small blood vessels. Diabetes 198130(Suppl 2)24–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Alderuccio F, Barnett A J, Campbell J H, Pedersen J S, Toh B H. Scl‐95‐100: doublet of endothelial marker autoantigens in progressive systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol 19866494–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van der Zee J M, Siegert C E, de Vreede T A, Daha M R, Breedveld F C. Characterization of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Exp Immunol 199184238–244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kaneko K, Savage C O S, Pottinger B E, Shah V, Pearson J D, Dillon M J. Anti‐endothelial cell antibodies can be cytotoxic to endothelial cells without cytokine prestimulation and correlate with ELISA antibody mesurement in Kawasaki disease. Clin Exp Immunol 19948264–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Del Papa N, Conforti G, Gambini D, La Rosa L, Tincani A, D'Cruz D.et al Characterization of the endothelial surface proteins recognized by anti‐endothelial antibodies in primary and secondary autoimmune vasculitis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 199470211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Frampton G, Moriya S, Pearson J D, Isenberg D A, Ward F J, Smith T A.et al Identification of candidate endothelial cell autoantigens in systemic lupus erythematosus using a molecular cloning strategy: a role for ribosomal P protein P0 as an endothelial cell autoantigen. Rheumatology 2000391114–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.van der Zee J M, Heurkens A H, van der Voort E A, Daha M R, Breedveld F C. Characterization of anti‐endothelial antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated by vasculitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 19919589–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Renaudineau Y, Dugue C, Dueymes M, Youinou P. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 20021365–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Matsuda M. Experimental glomerular tissue injury induced by immunization with cultured endothelial cell plasma membrane. Acta Pathol Japan 198838823–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Matsuo S, Fukatsu A, Taub M L, Caldwell P R, Brentjens J R, Andres G. Glomerulonephritis induced in the rabbit by antiendothelial antibodies. J Clin Invest 1987791798–1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Damianovich M, Gilburd B, George J, Del Papa N, Afek A, Goldberg I.et al Pathogenic role of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in vasculitis. An idiotypic experimental model. J Immunol 19961564946–4951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Matsumiya G, Shirakura R, Miyagawa S, Izutani H, Sawa Y, Nakata S.et al Analysis of rejection mechanism in the rat to mouse cardiac xenotransplantation. Role and characteristics of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies. Transplantation 1994571653–1660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fischel R J, Matas A J, Platt J L, Perry E, Noreen H, Shumway S J.et al Cardiac xenografting in the pig‐to‐rhesus monkey model: manipulation of antiendothelial antibody prolongs survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 199211965–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Richards A C, Davies H F, McLaughlin M L, Copeman L S, Holmes B J, Dos Santos Cruz G.et al Serum anti‐pig antibodies as potential indicators of acute humoral xenograft rejection in pig‐to‐cynomolgus monkey kidney transplantation. Transplantation 200273881–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li J S, Liu M F, Lei H Y. Characterization of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a potential marker for disease activity. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 199679211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Song J, Park Y B, Lee W K, Lee K H, Lee S K. Clinical associations of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 2000201–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Boomsma M M, Stearns‐Kurosawa D J, Stegeman C A, Raschi E, Meroni P L, Kurosawa S.et al Plasma levels of soluble endothelial cell protein C receptor in patients with Wegener's granulomatosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2002128187–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chan T M, Frampton G, Jayne D R, Perry G J, Lockwood C M, Cameron J S. Clinical significance of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic vasculitis: a longitudinal study comparing anti‐endothelial cell antibodies and anti‐neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies. Am J Kidney Dis 199322387–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gobel U, Eichhorn J, Kettritz R, Briedigkeit L, Sima D, Lindschau C.et al Disease activity and autoantibodies to endothelial cells in patients with Wegener's granulomatosis. Am J Kidney Dis 199628186–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bootsma H, Spronk P E, Ter Borg E J, Hummel E J, de Boer G, Limburg P C.et al The predictive value of fluctuations in IgM and IgG class anti‐dsDNA antibodies for relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective long‐term observation. Ann Rheum Dis 199756661–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hill M B, Phipps J L, Milford‐Ward A, Greaves M, Hughes P. Further characterization of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus by controlled immunoblotting. Br J Rheumatol 1996351231–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Navarro M, Cervera R, Font J, Reverter J C, Monteagudo J, Escolar G.et al Anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic autoimmune diseases: prevalence and clinical significance. Lupus 19976521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Perry G J, Elston T, Khouri N A, Chan T M, Cameron J S, Frampton G. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in lupus: correlations with renal injury and circulating markers of endothelial damage. Q J Med 199386727–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yoshio T, Masuyama J, Sumiya M, Minota S, Kano S. Antiendothelial cell antibodies and their relation to pulmonary hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1994212058–2063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.D'Cruz D P, Houssiau F A, Ramirez G, Baguley E, McCutcheon J, Vianna J.et al Antibodies to endothelial cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: a potential marker for nephritis and vasculitis. Clin Exp Immunol 199185254–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Moroni G, Trendelenburg M, Del Papa N, Quaglini S, Raschi E, Panzeri P.et al Anti‐C1q antibodies may help in diagnosing a renal flare in lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 200137490–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Negi V S, Tripathy N K, Misra R, Nityanand S. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in scleroderma correlate with severe digital ischemia and pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Rheumatol 199825462–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pignone A, Scaletti C, Matucci‐Cerinic M, Vazquez‐Abad D, Meroni P L, Del Papa N.et al Anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic sclerosis: significant association with vascular involvement and alveolo‐capillary impairment. Clin Exp Rheumatol 199816527–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ihn H, Sato S, Fujimoto M, Igarashi A, Yazawa N, Kubo M.et al Characterization of autoantibodies to endothelial cells in systemic sclerosis (SSc): association with pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2000119203–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hebbar M, Lassalle P, Delneste Y, Hatron P Y, Devulder B, Tonnel A B.et al Assessment of anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in systemic sclerosis and Sjogren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 199756230–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Salojin K V, Le Tonqueze M, Saraux A, Nassonov E L, Dueymes M, Piette J C.et al Antiendothelial cell antibodies: useful markers of systemic sclerosis. Am J Med 1997102178–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Salih A M, Nixon N B, Dawes P T, Mattey D L. Soluble adhesion molecules and anti‐endothelial cell antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated by peripheral neuropathy. J Rheumatol 199926551–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES