Abstract
Retinoids are known inhibitors of epithelial cell proliferation. Previous studies indicate that Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) is a pro-proliferative transcription factor. Here, we examined the effect of all-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) on proliferation of the intestinal epithelial cell line, IEC6. Treatment of IEC6 cells with ATRA inhibited their proliferation due to G1 cell cycle arrest. This inhibition was correlated with a decrease in the levels of KLF5 mRNA and promoter activity. In contrast, constitutive expression of KLF5 in stably transfected IEC6 cells with a KLF5-expressing plasmid driven by a viral promoter abrogated the growth inhibitory effect of ATRA. Moreover, ATRA inhibited proliferation of several human colon cancer cell lines with high levels of KLF5 expression but not those with low levels of KLF5 expression. Our results indicate that KLF5 is a potential mediator for the inhibitory effect of ATRA on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation.
Keywords: Cell cycle, Colon cancer, Krüppel-like factor 5, IKLF, Promoter, Pro-proliferative, Stable transfection
Abbreviations: APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; CMV, cytomegalovirus; DPBS, Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HA, hemagglutinin A; IEC, intestinal epithelial cells; KLF5, Krüppel-like factor 5; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI, propidium iodide; PKC, protein kinase C; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RARE, retinoic acid response element; RXR, retinoic X receptor
1. Introduction
Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) belong to a class of zinc finger-containing transcription factors that exhibit homology to the general transcription factor Sp1 [1–4]. Numerous studies indicate that KLFs play important roles in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation. Two KLFs are present at high levels in the intestinal epithelium although in different locations –KLF4 is expressed primarily in the terminally differentiated, post-mitotic epithelial cells [5,6] and KLF5 in the proliferating crypt compartment [7,8]. The two proteins also exhibit different biological properties – KLF4 is an inhibitor of cell proliferation [5,9,10] but KLF5 stimulates cell proliferation when overexpressed [11]. Thus, the two KLFs may function to coordinate proliferation of the intestinal epithelial cells (IEC).
Retinoids, and other derivatives of vitamin A, are known to have important functions in regulating differentiation and proliferation. The effects of retinoids are mediated by nuclear receptors, such as retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoic X receptors (RXRs) [12]. Because of their potent growth-suppressive effects, retinoids are used as a chemotherapeutic or chemopreventive agent in the treatment of a variety of disorders in preclinical and clinical settings [13,14]. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is one type of retinoid that binds preferentially to RARs, which form homodimers or heterodimers with RXRs and interact with retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) to mediate cellular response [15–17]. ATRA is an effective chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) [18]. In addition, ATRA exhibits an inhibitory effect in a number of colon cancer cell lines [19–21]. Therefore, ATRA may potentially serve as an anti-proliferative agent in the treatment of cancerous cells.
Previous studies have shown that overexpression of KLF5 stimulates proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells, IEC-18, and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts [11,22]. Moreover, RARα interacts with KLF5 and RAR ligands modulate KLF5 transcriptional activity and consequent cellular proliferation [23]. In the current study, we aimed at determining whether ATRA may modulate proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells, IEC6, and whether such modulation may be dependent on KLF5.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Cell lines
Non-transformed rat intestinal epithelial cells, IEC6, and the human colon cancer cell lines, DLD1, HT29 and RKO, were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The colon cancer cell line, Caco2-BBE, was previously described [24]. Stable transfection of IEC6 cells was performed by lipofection using pBK-CMV-KLF5-HA [7,11]. Transfected cells were selected with 1 mg/ml G418 and pooled for experimentation. Cells were treated with media containing 10 μM ATRA or ethanol control for the stated periods.
2.2. Cell proliferation assay
Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1 U/ml insulin, and 1% streptomycin. Cells were seeded at a density of 100000 cells/6-well dish and treated with ATRA or ethanol for the stated periods of time. Each day, cells were collected, washed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), trypsinized, and counted using a hemocytometer.
2.3. Luciferase assay
The mouse −1.5 kb KLF5 promoter linked to a luciferase reporter in the pGL2-Basic vector was provided by Dr. A. Levine [25] and transfected into IEC6 cells by lipofection along with a Renilla-luciferase reporter as a control. Transfected cells were treated with ethanol or 10 μM ATRA for 3 days before being harvested for reporter assays using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay protocol (Promega, Madison, WI).
2.4. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis
Cell cycle analysis was performed using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) as previously described [26,27]. Cells were trypsinized, washed with DPBS, and cooled to −20 °C overnight in 70% ethanol. Cells were then collected by centrifugation and stained with propidium iodide (PI) solution (50 μg/ml PI, 50 μg/ml RNase A, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.1 mM EDTA) for 25 min. Cells were analyzed using FAC-SCalibur cytometer (Becton–Dickinson).
2.5. Western blot analysis
Cells were washed with DPBS and collected by centrifugation. The cells were re-suspended in 1× lysis buffer (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA). The suspended cells were subjected to sonication and centrifugation. Western blot analysis was then performed using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against KLF5, hemagglutinin A (HA) (Santa Cruz Biotech.) or β-actin (Oncogene Research).
2.6. Northern blot analysis
RNA was extracted using the Trizol protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Twenty micrograms of RNA was loaded onto a denaturing agarose gel containing 10× MOPS buffer and 37% formaldehyde, and then transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond, Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). Radioactive [α-32P] dATP was used to label cDNA probes for KLF5 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The membrane was hybridized in Quikhyb solution (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), washed under high-stringency conditions, and scanned using a phosphorimager (Amersham).
3. Results
We first determined whether ATRA affects growth and proliferation of IEC6, a non-transformed rat intestinal epithelial cell line. As shown in Fig. 1A, treatment of IEC6 cells with 10 μM ATRA resulted in a significant reduction in their rate of proliferation between days 2 and 4 after seeding. This inhibitory effect was the consequence of cell cycle arrest at the G1/S boundary as demonstrated by the significant increase in the G1/S ratios of cells treated with ATRA as compared to control (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.

The effect of ATRA on proliferation and cell cycle profiles of IEC6 cells. (A) IEC6 cells were seeded at a density of 105 cells/6-well dish and maintained in media supplemented with 5% FBS and containing either 10 μM ATRA (closed squares) or ethanol control (closed triangles) for the stated number of days before being counted. N = 6. *P < 0.01. (B) For cells subjected to fluorescent-activated sorting, IEC6 cells were maintained in media containing 5% FBS and 10 μM ATRA (closed bars) or ethanol control (open bars) for the stated periods of time. Each day, cells were harvested and analyzed by FACS. Shown are the ratios of cells in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. N = 5. *P < 0.001.
We next determined whether ATRA treatment affects expression of the gene encoding KLF5, previously shown to be a pro-proliferative factor in IEC18 and NIH 3T3 cells [11,22]. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, treatment of IEC6 cells with ATRA from 5 to 50 μM for 3 days resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in the levels of KLF5 mRNA. Treatment of cells with lower doses of ATRA, between 1 and 1000 nM, resulted in a less prominent and non-linear reduction in the levels of KLF5 mRNA (Fig. 2C and D). For this reason, we used a concentration of 10 μM throughout the present study.
Fig. 2.

A dose-response study of ATRA on KLF5 mRNA levels in IEC6 cells. Northern blot analyses were conducted on RNA isolated from IEC6 cells treated with ATRA. Panel A is the result of a dose-response study in IEC6 cells treated for 3 days with ATRA with a concentration between 0 and 50 μM. Panel C is a similar experiment except that the concentration of ATRA was between 0 and 1000 nM. Blots were probed with KLF5 and then GAPDH. Panels B and D represent densitometric quantification of band intensities of KLF5 mRNA after normalizing to that of GAPDH.
We then performed a time-course study in IEC6 cells treated with ATRA or ethanol control. In the presence of ethanol control, the levels of KLF5 mRNA increased over time (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the levels of KLF5 mRNA in cells treated with 10 μM ATRA remained relatively unchanged for up to 4 days (Fig. 3B). The relative abundance of KLF5 mRNA in treated and control cells (Fig. 3C) paralleled that of their rates of proliferation as illustrated in Fig. 1A. These results indicate that ATRA inhibits expression of KLF5 in a dose-dependent and time-dependent fashion, and that inhibition of KLF5 expression is correlated with a reduction in the rate of proliferation.
Fig. 3.

A time-course and promoter study of ATRA on KLF5 mRNA levels in IEC6 cells. Northern blot analyses were conducted on RNA isolated from IEC6 cells treated with ethanol control (panel A) or 10 μM ATRA (panel B) on a daily basis up to 4 days after seeding. Panel C represents the densitometric quantification of band intensities of KLF5 mRNA after normalizing to that of GAPDH. In panel D, a −1.5 kb KLF5 promoter-luciferase plasmid was transfected into IEC6 cells and treated with 10 μM ATRA (closed bar) or ethanol control (open bar) for 3 days before being harvested for luciferase assays. Shown are the mean relative luciferase activities after normalizing for the internal Renilla luciferase control. N = 5. *P < 0.01.
We then investigated the mechanism by which ATRA inhibits the expression of KLF5. We performed transfection studies in IEC6 cells using a plasmid that contained −1.5 kb of the KLF5 promoter linked to a luciferase reporter and treated them with ATRA or ethanol control. Fig. 3D shows that treatment of transfected IEC6 cells with 10 μM ATRA for 3 days resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the activity of the reporter construct when compared to ethanol control. These findings suggest that the effect of ATRA on KLF5 expression is mediated at the level of gene transcription.
To further demonstrate that KLF5 mediates the inhibitory effect of ATRA on proliferation of IEC6 cells, we established a stably transfected IEC6 cell line that constitutively expressed KLF5 under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral promoter, which is not subject to regulation by ATRA. This cell line, called IEC6-KLF5, contained a significantly higher level of KLF5 mRNA when compared to untransfected IEC6 cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, when probed with an antibody against HA, IEC6-KLF5 cells contained HA-tagged KLF5 protein, which was absent from untransfected cells (Fig. 4B). As a consequence of stable and constitutive expression of KLF5, IEC-KLF5 cells exhibited a higher rate of proliferation when compared to the untransfected IEC6 cells (Fig. 4C). Importantly, treatment of IEC6-KLF5 with 10 μM ATRA failed to reduce the levels of KLF5 mRNA and protein as shown in Fig. 5A and B, respectively. In comparison, the levels of KLF5 mRNA and protein were reduced in untransfected IEC6 cells that were treated with ATRA (Fig. 5A and B). Moreover, constitutive expression of KLF5 in IEC6 cells resulted in resistance to ATRA as demonstrated by the lack of effect of ATRA on the rate of proliferation and cell cycle profile, illustrated in Fig. 5C and D, respectively. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of ATRA on IEC6 cells is primarily mediated by the ability of ATRA to inhibit endogenous KLF5 expression.
Fig. 4.

Establishment of stably transfected IEC6 cells with KLF5. IEC6 cells were transfected with pBK-CMV-KLF5-HA, selected with G418 and pooled for the study. The resultant cells are designated IEC6-KLF5. Shown are the results of Northern blot analysis (panel A) and Western blot analysis (panel B) on the levels of KLF5 mRNA and HA-tagged KLF5 protein from IEC6 and IEC6-KLF5. In panel C, IEC6 or IEC6-KLF5 was seeded at a density of 105 cells/6-well dish and propagated for 4 additional days. Cell numbers were determined on a daily basis. N = 6. *P < 0.01.
Fig. 5.

The effect of ATRA on KLF5 expression, proliferation, and cell cycle profile in untransfected and KLF5-transfected IEC6 cells. IEC6 and IEC6-KLF5 cells were treated with 10 μM ATRA or ethanol control for 3 days before being harvested for Northern (panel A) or Western (panel B) blot analyses. The antibody used in panel B is directed against KLF5. In panel C, IEC6-KLF5 cells were seeded at a density of 105 cells/6-well dish and treated with 10 μM ATRA (closed squares) or ethanol (closed diamonds) for the stated number of days. N = 6. In panel D, IEC6-KLF5 cells were treated as in panel C and analyzed by FACS on a daily basis. N = 5.
To determine whether ATRA may have an effect on proliferation of human colon cancer cell lines, we cultured several established colon cancer cell lines in the presence or absence of 10 μM ATRA. The growth rates of three cell lines, DLD1, Caco2-BBE and HT29, were sensitive to ATRA treatment (Fig. 6A, B and C, respectively). However, the rate of proliferation of RKO cells was indifferent to ATRA (Fig. 6D). A difference between the first three cell lines and RKO cells is that the basal level of KLF5 mRNA is significantly lower in RKO cells as compared to the first three cell lines (Fig. 6, insets). Importantly, the ability of ATRA to reduce cell proliferation is correlated with a reduction in the levels of KLF5 mRNA in DLD1, Caco2-BBE and HT29 cells (Fig. 6, insets). In RKO cells, the level of KLF5 mRNA was unchanged with ATRA treatment (Fig. 6D, inset). These results further suggest that KLF5 mediates the inhibitory effect of ATRA on IEC proliferation.
Fig. 6.

The effect of ATRA on proliferation of human colon cancer cell lines. Four different colon cancer cell lines were used in the study: DLD1 (panel A), Caco2-BBE (panel B), HT29 (panel C), and RKO (panel D). For each cell line, cells were seeded at a density of 105 cells/6-well dish and maintained in the presence of 10 μM ATRA or ethanol control for up to 4 days. N = 6. *P < 0.05. The insets show the mRNA levels of KLF5 and GAPDH in cells treated with ATRA (A) or ethanol control (E) for 3 days.
4. Discussion
Retinoids are known to play a vital role in various physiological processes such as embryogenesis, growth, differentiation and reproduction [28]. Studies also showed that retinoic acid can inhibit proliferation of many tumor cells grown in vitro [29]. These findings led to the successful clinical application of retinoids in the treatment or prevention of various human cancers, such as APL [18]. In the case of APL, ATRA is able to induce complete remission in almost all patients by inducing in vivo differentiation of blast cells in APL [18].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that the cellular effects of retinoids are mediated by nuclear receptors, including RARs and RXRs [12]. For example, the inhibitory effect of ATRA on proliferation of the human colon cancer cells, HT29, is mediated through RARα [19]. Also, induction of RAR in the retinoid-resistant colon cancer cells, LoVo, restored retinoid sensitivity [30]. Despite these findings, the mechanisms by which ATRA inhibits tumor cell proliferation remain poorly established.
In the current study, we characterized the anti-proliferative effect of ATRA on a non-transformed rat IEC line, IEC6. Our results showed that ATRA inhibits cell proliferation in IEC6 (Fig. 1A). This inhibitory effect is primarily due to an arrest in the G1 to S transition of the cell cycle (Fig. 1B). A similar effect of ATRA on the cell cycle has previously been demonstrated in myeloid cells [31] and ovarian carcinoma cells [32]. In myeloid cells, ATRA-induced cell cycle arrest is accompanied by downregulation of c-Myc and cyclin E [33], the latter an essential component for G1 to S transition. ATRA has also been shown to reduce expression of protein kinase C α (PKCα) and activity of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [34].
The Krüppel transcription factor, KLF5, has been shown to positively regulate cell proliferation in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and IEC [11,22]. Results of our present study indicate that ATRA inhibits expression of KLF5 in IEC6 cells (Figs. 2 and 3) by inhibiting the promoter activity of KLF5 (Fig. 3D). The reduction in KLF5 mRNA levels due to ATRA treatment is correlated with a reduction in the rate of proliferation (Figs. 1 and 3C). The dosage of ATRA that we chose was relatively high at 10 μM, based on the result of the dose-response experiment in Fig. 2. Several other studies have used lower dosages [35,36]. However, numerous studies have also used higher concentrations of ATRA similar to ours in order to accomplish the inhibitory effects of ATRA in various cell lines [37–40]. Therefore, the different sensitivity of different cell lines to ATRA is probably a cell type-specific event.
IEC6 cells stably transfected with a viral promoter-driven KLF5-expression vector contained a higher level of KLF5 mRNA and protein and a higher rate of proliferation as compared to untransfected IEC6 cells (Fig. 4). When treated with ATRA, the levels of KLF5 mRNA and protein were not decreased in IEC6-KLF5 cells as opposed to untransfected IEC6 cells (Fig. 5A and B). This is primarily due to the constitutive expression of KLF5 from a viral promoter that is not affected by ATRA. This constitutive expression resulted in the IEC-KLF5 cells to resist the inhibitory effect of ATRA as demonstrated in Fig. 5C and D. These results suggest that KLF5 is a mediator for the inhibitory effect of ATRA on proliferation of IEC6 cells, although we could not rule out KLF5-independent mechanisms. It is of interest to note that KLF5 expression is stimulated by the phorbol ester, PMA, a potent activator of PKCα [11,41]. Moreover, studies indicate that KLF5 expression is stimulated by MAPK activation [41,42]. The fact that ATRA inhibits both PKCα and MAPK [34] may be a mechanism by which it inhibits KLF5 expression. It should be noted that cyclin D1 has been shown to be a target of regulation by KLF5 [42]. The effect of ATRA on G1 progression can therefore be a consequence of its ability to inhibit cyclin D1 expression through KLF5.
ATRA has previously been shown to inhibit proliferation of some, but not all, colon cancer cells [19–21,30]. Our study demonstrated that 3 colon cancer cell lines, including DLD1, Caco2-BBE and HT29, are sensitive to the inhibitory effect of ATRA but RKO cells are resistant (Fig. 6). Previous studies suggest that the presence or absence of RARs in cells appears to play a role in determining whether cells are sensitive or resistant to ATRA treatment [21,30]. However, all of the cells that we examined contain RARα (data not shown). Instead, the ability of ATRA to inhibit cell proliferation is directly correlated with a reduction in KLF5 mRNA levels in the 3 sensitive cell lines (Fig. 6A, B and C). The lone cell line, RKO, that is resistant to ATRA action, contains little KLF5 mRNA at baseline, which is not changed with ATRA treatment (Fig. 6D). These results further support the role of KLF5 in mediating the inhibitory effect of ATRA on cell proliferation. Furthermore, whether a tumor cell is sensitive to ATRA may in part be determined by the degree of KLF5 expression.
The relationship between KLF5 and retinoids in regulating cell proliferation has also been demonstrated in vivo [23]. This was shown by the ability of RAR ligands to modulate KLF5 transcriptional activity. Moreover, RAR and KLF5 physically interact. A consequence of this relationship is the ability of a RAR agonist, Am80, to inhibit vascular remodeling in vivo, a process that is dependent on KLF5 [23]. Whether RAR and KLF5 physically interact in IEC is unclear at this time.
In conclusion, our study demonstrated an important role for KLF5 in mediating the inhibitory effect of ATRA on proliferation of IEC. We also showed that differential sensitivity of colon cancer cells to ATRA may be due to differential levels of KLF5 expression. Additional correlation between KLF5 expression and ATRA sensitivity in other cell lines may further substantiate the role of KLF5 in modulating IEC proliferation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. J. Lingrel and A. Levine for providing the pBK-CMV-KLF5-HA [7] and −1.5 kb KLF5 promoter-luciferase [25] plasmids, respectively. This work was in part supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK52230, DK64399, and CA84197. V.W.Y. is the recipient of a Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Clinician Scientist award.
Footnotes
Edited by Ned Mantei
References
- 1.Dang DT, Pevsner J, Yang VW. The biology of the mammalian Krüppel-like family of transcription factors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2000;32:1103–1121. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(00)00059-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Black AR, Black JD, Azizkhan-Clifford J. Sp1 and Krüppel-like factor family of transcription factors in cell growth regulation and cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2001;188:143–160. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaczynski J, Cook T, Urrutia R. Sp1- and Krüppel-like transcription factors. Genome Biol. 2003;4:206. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bieker JJ. Krüppel-like factors: three fingers in many pies. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:34355–34358. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100043200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shields JM, Christy RJ, Yang VW. Identification and characterization of a gene encoding a gut-enriched Krüppel-like factor expressed during growth arrest. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20009–20017. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.33.20009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garrett-Sinha LA, Eberspaecher H, Seldin MF, de Crombrugghe B. A gene for a novel zinc-finger protein expressed in differentiated epithelial cells and transiently in certain mesenchymal cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31384–31390. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conkright MD, Wani MA, Anderson KP, Lingrel JB. A gene encoding an intestinal-enriched member of the Krüppel-like factor family expressed in intestinal epithelial cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1263–1270. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.5.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ohnishi S, Laub F, Matsumoto N, Asaka M, Ramirez F, Yoshida T, Terada M. Developmental expression of the mouse gene coding for the Krüppel-like transcription factor KLF5. Dev Dyn. 2000;217:421–429. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200004)217:4<421::AID-DVDY9>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen X, Johns DC, Geiman DE, Marban E, Dang DT, Hamlin G, Sun R, Yang VW. Krüppel-like factor 4 (gut-enriched Krüppel-like factor) inhibits cell proliferation by blocking G1/S progression of the cell cycle. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30423–30428. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101194200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen X, Whitney EM, Gao SY, Yang VW. Transcriptional profiling of Krüppel-like factor 4 reveals a function in cell cycle regulation and epithelial differentiation. J Mol Biol. 2003;326:665–677. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01449-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun R, Chen X, Yang VW. Intestinal-enriched Krüppel-like factor (Krüppel-like factor 5) is a positive regulator of cellular proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:6897–6900. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000870200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bastien J, Rochette-Egly C. Nuclear retinoid receptors and the transcription of retinoid-target genes. Gene. 2004;328:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Freemantle SJ, Spinella MJ, Dmitrovsky E. Retinoids in cancer therapy and chemoprevention: promise meets resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7305–7315. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lippman SM, Heyman RA, Kurie JM, Benner SE, Hong WK. Retinoids and chemoprevention: clinical and basic studies. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;22:1–10. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240590802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vasios GW, Gold JD, Petkovich M, Chambon P, Gudas LJ. A retinoic acid-responsive element is present in the 5′ flanking region of the laminin B1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:9099–9103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naar AM, Boutin JM, Lipkin SM, Yu VC, Holloway JM, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. The orientation and spacing of core DNA-binding motifs dictate selective transcriptional responses to three nuclear receptors. Cell. 1991;65:1267–1279. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90021-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Umesono K, Murakami KK, Thompson CC, Evansm RM. Direct repeats as selective response elements for the thyroid hormone, retinoic acid, and vitamin D3 receptors. Cell. 1991;65:1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90020-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Degos L, Wang ZY. All-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncogene. 2001;20:7140–7145. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nicke B, Kaiser A, Wiedenmann B, Riecken EO, Rosewicz S. Retinoic acid receptor alpha mediates growth inhibition by retinoids in human colon carcinoma HT29 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;261:572–577. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim EJ, Kang YH, Schaffer S, Bach A, MacDonald RG, Park JH. Inhibition of Caco-2 cell proliferation by all-trans retinoic acid: role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-6. J Cell Physiol. 2002;190:92–100. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee MO, Han SY, Jiang S, Park JH, Kim SJ. Differential effects of retinoic acid on growth and apoptosis in human colon cancer cell lines associated with the induction of retinoic acid receptor β. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59:485–496. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00355-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bateman NW, Tan R, Pestell G, Black JD, Black AR. Intestinal tumor progression is associated with altered function of KLF5. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:12093–12101. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311532200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shindo T, Manabe I, Fukushima Y, Tobe K, Aizawa K, Miyamoto S, Kawai-Kowase K, Moriyama N, Imai Y, Kawakami H, Nishimatsu H, Ishikawa T, Suzuki T, Morita H, Maemura K, Sata M, Hirata Y, Komukai M, Kagechika H, Kadowaki T, Kurabayashi M, Nagai R. Krüppel-like zinc-finger transcription factor KLF5/BTEB2 is a target for angiotensin II signaling and an essential regulator of cardiovascular remodeling. Nat Med. 2002;8:856–863. doi: 10.1038/nm738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Buyse M, Charrier L, Sitaraman S, Gewirtz A, Merlin D. Interferon-γ increases hPepT1-mediated uptake of ditripeptides including the bacterial tripeptide fMLP in polarized intestinal epithelia. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1969–1977. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63555-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ziemer LT, Pennica D, Levine AJ. Identification of a mouse homolog of the human BTEB2 transcription factor as a β-catenin-independent Wnt-1-responsive gene. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:562–574. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.2.562-574.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yoon HS, Chen X, Yang VW. Krüppel-like factor 4 mediates p53-dependent G1/S cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:2101–2105. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211027200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yoon HS, Yang VW. Requirement of Krüppel-like factor 4 in preventing entry into mitosis following DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:5035–5041. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307631200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.De Luca L. Retinoids and their receptors in differentiation, embryogenesis, and neoplasia. FASEB J. 1991;5:2924–2933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lotan R. Effects of vitamin A and its analogs (retinoids) on normal and neoplastic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;605:33–91. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(80)90021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nicke B, Riecken EO, Rosewicz S. Induction of retinoic acid receptor beta mediates growth inhibition in retinoid resistant human colon carcinoma cells. Gut. 1999;45:51–57. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dimberg A, Oberg F. Retinoic acid-induced cell cycle arrest of human myeloid cell lines. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44:1641–1650. doi: 10.1080/1042819031000083316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu S, Donigan A, Platsoucas CD, Jung W, Soprano DR, Soprano KJ. All-trans-retinoic acid blocks cell cycle progression of human ovarian adenocarcinoma cells at late G1. Exp Cell Res. 1997;232:277–286. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dimberg A, Bahram F, Karlberg I, Larsson LG, Nilsson K, Oberg F. Retinoic acid-induced cell cycle arrest of human myeloid cell lines is associated with sequential down-regulation of c-Myc and cyclin E and posttranscriptional up-regulation of p27 (Kip1) Blood. 2002;99:2199–2206. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.6.2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakagawa S, Fujii T, Yokoyama G, Kazanietz MG, Yamana H, Shirouzu K. Cell growth inhibition by all-trans retinoic acid in SKBR-3 breast cancer cells: involvement of protein kinase C α and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol Carcinog. 2003;38:106–116. doi: 10.1002/mc.10150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McGaffin KR, Acktinson LE, Chrysogelos SA. Growth and EGFR regulation in breast cancer cells by vitamin D and retinoid compounds. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;86:55–73. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032923.66250.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen Q, Ross AC. Retinoic acid regulates cell cycle progression and cell differentiation in human monocytic THP-1 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2004;297:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Obad S, Brunnstrom H, Vallon-Christersson J, Borg A, Drott K, Gullberg U. Staf50 is a novel p53 target gene conferring reduced clonogenic growth of leukemic U-937 cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:4050–4059. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.del Rincon SV, Rousseau C, Samanta R, Miller WH. Retinoic acid-induced growth arrest of MCF-7 cells involves the selective regulation of the IRS-1/PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Oncogene. 2003;22:3353–3360. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Um SJ, Sin HS, Han HS, Kwon YJ, Kim EJ, Park SH, Kim SY, Bae TS, Park JS, Rho YS. Potent cytotoxic effects of novel retinamide derivatives in ovarian cancer cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26:1412–1417. doi: 10.1248/bpb.26.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Um SJ, Han HS, Kwon YJ, Park SH, Rho YS, Sin HS, Park JS. Novel retinoic acid derivative ABPN has potent inhibitory activity on cell growth and apoptosis in cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:1038–1046. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kawai-Kowase K, Kurabayashi M, Hoshino Y, Ohyama Y, Nagai R. Transcriptional activation of the zinc finger transcription factor BTEB2 gene by Egr-1 through mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1999;85:787–795. doi: 10.1161/01.res.85.9.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nandan MO, Yoon HS, Zhao W, Ouko LA, Chanchevalap S, Yang VW. Krüppel-like factor 5 mediates the transforming activity of oncogenic H-Ras. Oncogene. 2004;23:3404–3413. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
