Abstract
Calmodulinopathies are caused by mutations in calmodulin (CaM) and result in debilitating cardiac arrythmias such as long-QT syndrome (LQTS) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). In addition, many patients exhibit neurological comorbidities, including developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder. Prior studies have identified the impairment of Ca2+/CaM-dependent inactivation (CDI) of CaV1.2 channels as a major pathogenic mechanism leading to the LQTS phenotype in these patients. However, the impact of these mutations on other voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) has yet to be fully explored. Here, we examine the potential for pathological CaM variants to impair the Ca2+/CaM-dependent regulation of CaV1.3 and CaV2.1, both essential for neuronal function. We find that pathogenic mutations in CaM can impair the CDI of CaV1.3, with overlapping yet distinct disruption of the Ca2+-dependent facilitation (CDF) of CaV2.1 channels. Moreover, while the majority of CaM variants demonstrated the ability to bind the IQ region of each channel, differences were noted between CaV1.3 and CaV2.1, demonstrating unique CaM interactions across the two channel subtypes. Further, C-lobe CaM variants display a reduced ability to sense Ca2+ when in complex with the CaV IQ domains, explaining the Ca2+/CaM regulation deficits. Overall, these results support the possibility that disrupted Ca2+/CaM regulation of multiple VGCCs may contribute to the pathogenesis of calmodulinopathies.
Introduction
Calmodulin (CaM) is a small yet indispensable protein encoded by the CALM1, CALM2, and CALM3 genes. It is found in all eukaryotic cells, where it acts as an essential Ca2+ sensor (Brehm and Eckert, 1978; Peterson et al., 1999; Qin et al., 1999; Zuhlke et al., 1999; Hussey et al., 2023). Each CaM molecule contains four Ca2+ binding EF hand domains, which occur in coordinating pairs in each of the two lobes of CaM (Fig. 1A). Ca2+ binding to CaM impacts the function of an array of target proteins (Westerlund and Delemotte, 2018), including voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs) where apoCaM preassociates with the C-tail of the channel to act as a resident Ca2+ sensor (Peterson et al., 1999; Qin et al., 1999; Zuhlke et al., 1999; Ben-Johny and Dick, 2022). Over the past decade, a growing number of missense mutations in CaM have been identified in patients suffering from debilitating and life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, known as calmodulinopathies (Nyegaard et al., 2012; Crotti et al., 2013; Limpitikul et al., 2014; George, 2015; Reed et al., 2015; Crotti et al., 2019; Nyegaard and Overgaard, 2019; Crotti et al., 2023; Hussey et al., 2023). Disease phenotypes primarily include long-QT syndrome (LQTS) and/or catecholaminergic polymorphic tachycardia (CPVT) (Fig. 1A) (Nyegaard et al., 2012; Crotti et al., 2023), with some reports describing neurological comorbidities, including developmental delay, seizures, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Crotti et al., 2023). Moreover, some CaM variants have been identified in patients with predominantly neurological symptoms and minimal or no identified cardiac pathology (Crotti et al., 2023), demonstrating a diverse pathogenic phenotype.
Figure 1: CaM mutants impair CaV1.2 CDI.

(A) Depiction of CaM mutations described in this study; associated with CPVT (orange), LQTS and neurodevelopmental delay (pink), and sudden death (SUD) (green) highlighted. (B) Table describing the reported clinical phenotypes associated with each CaM mutation. Symptoms were originally reported in (Nyegaard et al., 2012; Crotti et al., 2013; Kaplanis et al., 2020; Crotti et al., 2023) (C) Degree of CaV1.2 CDI conferred by CaM mutants. CDI is evaluated as the difference in the fractional Ba2+ and Ca2+ currents remaining after 300 ms following sustained depolarizations to 30 mV from −80 mV. Data in gray (Limpitikul et al., 2014), and blue (Brohus et al., 2021) were previously reported and presented here for context. D, Top: exemplar traces displaying inactivation of CaV1.2 currents in the presence of CaM WT or CaM D132G and the β2a accessory subunit, with Ba2+ currents (black) normalized to Ca2+ currents (red). Scale bars reflect Ca2+ currents. Bottom: data displaying r300 values at varying test potentials. CDI evaluated as f300 at 30 mV was compared via a Student’s t-test (**** p < 0.0001). Values for n correspond to number of cells within both Ca2+ and Ba2+ datasets. Data plotted ± SEM.
Investigations have revealed multiple pathological mechanisms attributable to calmodulinopathy variants, often involving a diminished ability of CaM to bind to Ca2+ (Nyegaard et al., 2012; Crotti et al., 2013; Limpitikul et al., 2014). Many of these variants were found to impair the Ca2+/CaM-dependent regulation of the VGCC CaV1.2, an essential component of cardiac function known to contribute to LQTS (Limpitikul et al., 2014; Dick et al., 2016; Limpitikul et al., 2017; Bamgboye et al., 2022). In these channels, CaM-dependent regulation takes the form of Ca2+/CaM-dependent inactivation (CDI) (Brehm and Eckert, 1978; Peterson et al., 1999; Qin et al., 1999; Zuhlke et al., 1999), a vital form of negative feedback that tempers Ca2+ entry into cells. While each lobe of CaM is independently capable of imparting channel regulation (DeMaria et al., 2001; Ben-Johny and Dick, 2022), the majority of CaV1.2 CDI stems from the C-lobe, consistent with the fact that almost all LQTS-associated variants identified thus-far are located within the C-lobe of CaM (Crotti et al., 2023; Hussey et al., 2023).
In addition to CaV1.2; CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 also exhibit robust C-lobe CaM-mediated regulation (Lee et al., 1999; Erickson et al., 2001; Ben-Johny and Dick, 2022), making them potential pathogenic targets in calmodulinopathies. As in CaV1.2, CaM modulates CaV1.3 by conferring CDI, with distinct contributions from each lobe of CaM (DeMaria et al., 2001). Additionally, multiple splice variants of CaV1.3 exist with distinct CaM regulatory features. While a short form of the channel (CaV1.343s) exhibits robust CDI, a long splice variant, CaV1.3L, contains a C-terminal domain, termed inhibitor of CDI (ICDI) (Wahl-Schott et al., 2006) or C-terminal modulatory domain (CTM) (Lieb et al., 2012), that diminishes CDI by competing with CaM binding to the channel (Liu et al., 2010). These splice variants are crucial for adjusting the channel’s activity for distinct cellular requirements, demonstrating the importance of fine-tuned CaM regulation in physiological function (Bock et al., 2011; Ben-Johny and Dick, 2022). For CaV2.1, CDI is primarily mediated by the N-lobe of CaM, while the C-lobe drives Ca2+- dependent facilitation (CDF), characterized by a transient elevation of whole-cell currents following Ca2+ entry through the channel (DeMaria et al., 2001). Each of these channels are widely expressed in multiple brain regions (Hell et al., 1993; Tan et al., 2011; Catterall et al., 2013; Nanou et al., 2018) and disruption of these channels has been associated with ASD (Pinggera et al., 2015; Limpitikul et al., 2016), developmental delay (Folacci et al., 2023), and other neurological disorders (Pietrobon, 2010; Indelicato et al., 2019; Folacci et al., 2023; Kramer et al., 2023; Timothy et al., 2024), making them potentially relevant to the neurological features in calmodulinopathies.
In this study, we examine the biophysical properties of calmodulinopathy variants in the context of CaV1.3 and CaV2.1, both in terms of channel regulation and binding affinity. We focus on mutations identified within the C-lobe of CaM previously shown to decrease the affinity of Ca2+ binding to CaM and reduce the CDI of CaV1.2 channels (Crotti et al., 2013; Limpitikul et al., 2014). We find that many of these mutations exhibit profound disruptions of CaV1.3 CDI and CaV2.1 CDF, demonstrating a potential role for these channels in calmodulinopathy pathogenesis. Comparatively, a CPVT-associated mutation within the N-lobe of CaM demonstrated no significant impact on CDI or CDF of these channels, consistent with a primarily cardiac pathology acting through the ryanodine receptor (RyR2), as previously described (Hwang et al., 2014; Sondergaard et al., 2015b; Sondergaard et al., 2020). Thus, our results demonstrate a potential mechanism by which LQTS-associated CaM variants may impact multiple VGCCs including those outside the heart.
Results
CaV1.2 and CaM D132G
Calmodulinopathy variants have been associated with a range of symptoms and evaluated for effects on a variety of target proteins (Crotti et al., 2013; Hwang et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2014; George, 2015; Jensen et al., 2018; Crotti et al., 2019; Nyegaard and Overgaard, 2019; Clemens et al., 2020; Ledford et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2021). Here, we focus on several variants which have been strongly implicated in LQTS and sudden death, with variable reports of neurological features (Fig. 1 A, B). Mutations D96V, F142L, D130G and D132G reside in the C-lobe of CaM and are strongly associated with LQTS. They have each been documented in patients suffering from ASD, developmental delay, and/or epilepsy, with F142L associated with a broader set of reported neurological deficits (Crotti et al., 2013; Kaplanis et al., 2020; Crotti et al., 2023).(Crotti et al., 2013; Kaplanis et al., 2020; Crotti et al., 2023). While D96V has a reported association with developmental delay (Crotti et al., 2013), the neurological effects appear less consistently reported (Crotti et al., 2013; Crotti et al., 2023) (Crotti et al., 2013; Crotti et al., 2023) and were subsequent to cardiac arrest, making it difficult to rule out hypoxic injury. CaM mutations at residue G114 have previously been associated with sudden death and cardiac arrest, however, neurological symptoms were noted to be absent (Brohus et al., 2021; Crotti et al., 2023). Finally, we include the N-lobe mutation CaM N54I, which has a well-evidenced pathological role in CPVT (Nyegaard et al., 2012) with the effects largely independent of VGCC channels, making it a useful control for nonspecific effects.
In the case of LQTS, CaM mutants are thought to contribute to the disease largely through the disruption of CaV1.2 CDI (Limpitikul et al., 2014). The majority of C-lobe mutations focused on in this study have previously been shown to blunt CaV1.2 CDI, while the CPVT-associated N54I mutation largely spares CDI (Fig. 1C) (Limpitikul et al., 2014; Brohus et al., 2021). However, the effect of the CaM mutation D132G has yet to be evaluated on CaV1.2 despite association with severe LQTS (Zahavich et al., 2018) and developmental delay (Kaplanis et al., 2020). We therefore sought to determine the impact of CaM D132G on CaV1.2 CDI. To do so, we co-expressed mutant CaM with CaV1.2 in HEK293 cells, such that CDI can be seen as the larger decay of the Ca2+ current (red), as compared to the Ba2+ current (black) in response to a sustained depolarization from –80 mV to 30 mV (Fig. 1D, top). CDI is then quantified by comparing the ratio of Ca2+ current that remains following 300 ms of depolarization (r300) with that of Ba2+. In this way, Ba2+ currents serve to control for the VDI of the channels, which occurs alongside CDI and is minimized in our recording conditions by the use of the β2a auxiliary subunit. In the presence of CaM D132G, the Ca2+ current is largely sustained following the depolarizing step, demonstrating a loss of CDI which persists across a range of test potentials (Fig. 1D, bottom). Thus, CaM D132G displays a similar capacity to reduce CaV1.2 CDI as compared to other previously documented LQTS-associated CaM variants (Limpitikul et al., 2014) (Fig. 1C).
The Impact of Pathological CaM Mutations on CaV1.3 Regulation
Given that regulation of channel gating by CaM extends beyond CaV1.2, we investigated the effects of pathological CaM variants on CaV1.3 inactivation, starting with the CaV1.3L splice variant. CaV1.3L channels represent a long splice variant (also called CaV1.342 (Bock et al., 2011)), which includes the ICDI/CTM (Singh et al., 2008; Lieb et al., 2012) resulting in a channel with attenuated CDI. Nonetheless, under conditions where exogenous CaM is overexpressed, robust CDI is observed in the presence of CaM WT (Fig. 2A). Strong CDI (red) is observed across a range of depolarizing potentials (Fig. 2A, middle), while Ba2+ currents (black) exhibit only modest VDI. While the N-lobe CaM N54I produced no significant deficits in CDI (Fig. 2B), each of the C-lobe CaM mutations imparted significant reduction in CDI as compared to CaM WT (Fig. 2C-G). We also note that the CDI observed in the presence of G114R displayed more rapid inactivation kinetics as compared to the other mutants. As CaM is capable of mediating CDI in CaV1.3L channels through both the C- and N-lobes (Dick et al., 2008), the remaining CDI observed in the calmodulinopathy variants is likely due largely to N-lobe CDI, which is known to exhibit slower inactivation kinetics as compared to C-lobe mediated CDI (Peterson et al., 1999; Yang et al., 2006; Dick et al., 2008). Consistent with this, an artificially mutated CaM1234, in which Ca2+ binding is eliminated in both lobes of CaM, results in complete abolition of CDI in CaV1.3L (Fig. 2H). Thus, calmodulinopathy variants can impair CaV1.3L CDI in a manner similar to that observed in CaV1.2 (Fig. 1).
Figure 2: CaM mutants impair CaV1.3L CDI.

(A-H) Top: Exemplar current traces for CaV1.3L co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant and the β2a accessory subunit. Ba2+ currents (black) are normalized to Ca2+ currents (red). Scale bars reflect Ca2+ currents. Middle: population data displaying r1000 values for CaV1.3L and the indicated CaM variants. f1000 values were compared at 10 mV for each variant using a one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnet’s test for multiple comparisons relative to WT (**** p < 0.0001). Values for n correspond to number of cells within both Ca2+ and Ba2+ datasets. Data plotted ± SEM. Bottom: Ca2+ current-voltage relationships showing no change in voltage dependence across CaM variants. Current density plots are normalized to peak.
Analysis of the voltage dependence of activation (Fig. 2A-H, bottom) revealed no difference across each condition, however evaluation of Ba2+ current decay during the depolarization revealed a slight but significant variability in VDI. Specifically, at higher test potential voltages, CaM G114R imparted greater VDI than other mutants or WT CaM as revealed by Ba2+ r1000 values (Fig. 2D, black). Additionally, CaM D132G appeared to follow a similar trend, but this effect did not rise to the level of significance (Fig. 2F). To investigate this phenomenon further, these mutants were co-expressed with CaV1.3L in conditions optimized to reveal voltage-dependent effects. Employing the β1b accessory subunit in the transfection permits robust VDI in CaV1.3L channels (Fig. 3A, top). Once again, the G114R mutant revealed a slight but significantly enhanced VDI as compared to CaM WT or CaM D132G, as revealed by smaller r1000 values following 20 mV depolarizations (Fig. 3A-C, bottom panel). Thus, it appears that VDI is uniquely different in the CaM G114R recordings.
Figure 3: CaM variant G114R increases CaV1.3L VDI.

(A-C) Top: Exemplar Ba2+ current traces for CaV1.3L co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant and β1b accessory subunit. Bottom: Ba2+ r1000 values displayed across test potentials. r1000 values were compared at 20 mV for each CaM variant via a one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnet’s test for multiple comparisons relative to WT (* p = 0.035). Data plotted ± SEM.
We next considered the impact of the CaM mutants on a short isoform of CaV1.3, CaV1.343s, which lacks the modulatory ICDI/CTM domain and thus displays full CDI (Bock et al., 2011). The CaM mutants had generally similar impacts on CDI in CaV1.343s as they did in CaV1.3L (Fig. 4A-H). As expected, the N54I N-lobe CPVT mutant was not statistically different from WT (Fig. 4B), while mutations D96V, D130G, D132G, and F142L all significantly impaired CDI (Fig. 4B, 4C, 4E-G). The artificial mutation CaM1234 produced a near total lack of CaV1.343s CDI (Fig. 4H). In contrast, CaM G114R, which displayed diminished CDI as compared to overexpressed CaM WT in CaV1.3L, showed no effect on CaV1.343s CDI (Fig. 4D). Additionally, no effects on CaV1.343s VDI were observed.
Figure 4: CaM mutants impair CaV1.343s CDI.

(A-H) Top: Exemplar traces for CaV1.343s co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant and the β2a accessory subunit. Ba2+ currents (black) are normalized to Ca2+ currents (red), with scale bars referring to Ca2+. Middle: data displaying r1000 values across varying test potentials. f1000 values were compared at 10 mV for each of the CaM variants using a one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnet’s test for multiple comparisons as compared to WT (**** p < 0.0001). Values for n correspond to number of cells within both Ca2+ and Ba2+ datasets. Data plotted ± SEM. Bottom: Ca2+ current-voltage relationships showing no change in voltage dependence across CaM variants. Current density plots are normalized to peak.
The Effect of CaM Mutations on CaV1.3 Association
While most C-lobe CaM mutants conferred CaV1.3L and CaV1.343s CDI deficits in a similar fashion to their action on CaV1.2, data from CaM G114R diverges from this paradigm. It is therefore reasonable to question how CaM G114R interacts with CaV1.3. Notably, the results for each CaV1.3 splice variant would be consistent with a lack of CaM G114R binding to the channel. Thus, the possibility emerges that CaM G114R does not interact with either CaV1.3 variant, and the results demonstrate the expected CDI under endogenous CaM WT levels (Liu et al., 2010). Moreover, any mutant CaM must bind to the channel at least as well as CaM WT in the apo state in order for the variant CaM to preassociate with a significant portion of channels in the context of mixed WT and mutant CaM expression (Erickson et al., 2003; Limpitikul et al., 2014; Badone et al., 2018; Hussey et al., 2023). We therefore sought to explore whether each mutant CaM is capable of binding the channel with a similar affinity as compared to CaM WT utilizing Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). To quantify binding activity, we employed a previously validated (Ben-Johny et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Rivas et al., 2021) live-cell flow cytometric methodology to construct FRET-based binding curves and estimate the effective binding affinity (KD,Eff) for each channel/CaM pair (Table 1). A peptide spanning known C-terminal CaM binding regions of CaV1.3 was ligated to a donor fluorophore, while CaM was joined to an acceptor fluorophore (Fig. 5A), and the two were expressed in HEK293 cells under basal Ca2+ conditions. Exemplar binding curves (Fig. 5D-I) of CaM variants N54I, D96V, D130G, D132G, and F142L show broad similarity with the binding curve of CaM WT, and the average results from each of these mutants demonstrate no significant alterations to KD,Eff relative to WT (Fig. 5B, Table 1). However, CaM G114R demonstrates a profoundly diminished KD,Eff (Fig. 5B, F, Table 1), where maximal saturation could not be achieved under the experimental condition. Thus, CaM G114R appears to exhibit reduced preassociation with the channel in the apo state.
Table 1: KDeff and EDmax values derived from CaV1.3-CaM FRET interactions.
| Cerulean-CaV1.3 Fragment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaM Variant | Mean KDeff | S.E.M | Mean EDmax | S.E.M. | n |
| WT | 1618 | 87.58 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 14 |
| N54I | 1176 | 44.57 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 3 |
| D96V | 1753 | 162.1 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 5 |
| G114R | 18195**** | 3455 | 0.17** | 0.03 | 4 |
| D130G | 3808 | 335.5 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 6 |
| D132G | 3046 | 635.6 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 5 |
| F142L | 380.6 | 7.073 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 3 |
| CaM1234 | 4834* | 289.3 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 6 |
Mean KDeff and EDmax values for each CaV channel fragment/CaM mutant interaction were compared using one-way ANOVAs, followed by Dunnet’s tests for multiple comparisons relative to WT
(p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.0001).
Values for n reflect independent experimental samples, each consisting of >2000 cells used to create the FRET binding curves.
FRET values corresponding to Fig. 5
Figure 5: Evaluation of CaM binding to CaV1.3.

(A) Illustration of the constructs utilized. A CaV1.3 C-terminal channel fragment including the IQ domain as indicated is concatenated with Cerulean. Each CaM variant was generated within a Venus-CaM construct. B: Measured relative binding efficiencies (KD,eff) plotted for the CaV1.3 channel fragment and CaM variants in low cytosolic Ca2+. Each data point represents an independent replicate including >2000 cells. Significance was ascertained with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnet’s test for multiple comparisons relative to WT (****, p > 0.0001; *, p = 0.033). Data plotted ± SEM. C-J: FRET binding curves from a live-cell flow cytometric FRET assay for the CaV1.3 channel fragment and indicated CaM variant. Each point reflects the result from an individual cell, with a curve in black (WT) or orange (mutant) fitted to estimate effective KD (KD,eff). Data is plotted as a function of free acceptor fluorophore molecules (Afree) and donor-centric FRET efficiency (ED). WT results are reproduced on variant data as the gray dashed curve for comparison.
Given that CaM binding can be impacted by its association with Ca2+ (Brohus et al., 2021), we investigated whether CaM G114R/CaV1.3 binding could be recovered under conditions sufficient to calcify CaM. Subsequent testing revealed that, in the presence of an ionophore and high external Ca2+, binding activity could be partially rescued (Fig. 6A-C). These data indicate that calcified CaM G114R maintains the ability to bind CaV1.3 at high Ca2+, but preassociation in the apo-state is likely reduced. Given this result, the modified CDI observed in CaV1.3L (Fig. 2D) as compared to overexpressed CaM WT (Fig. 2A) is likely due to the known competition between CaM and ICDI/CTM for binding to the CaV1.3 IQ (Fig. 6D). At low, endogenous levels of CaM WT, ICDI/CTM is able to out-compete CaM for binding to the channel, resulting in a significant reduction of CDI as previously described (Singh et al., 2006; Wahl-Schott et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2010; Lieb et al., 2012; Sang et al., 2021). Upon overexpression of CaM WT, CDI is restored due to mass action. Without sufficient apoCaM binding, CaM G114R does not alter this scheme. Moreover, in CaV1.343s lacking ICDI/CTM, endogenous CaM is sufficient to drive robust CDI, and the lack of CaM G114R binding causes no apparent difference in CDI.
Figure 6: Binding of CaM G114R to CaV1.3 is partially restored by elevated Ca2+.

(A-B) FRET binding curves from a live-cell flow cytometric FRET assay for the CaV1.3 channel fragment and CaM WT (A) or CaM G114R (B) performed in high Ca2+ conditions. Each point reflects the result from an individual cell, with a curve in red fitted to estimate effective KD (KD,eff). Low (basal) Ca2+ results are reproduced as the gray dashed curve for reference. C: Effective KD values (KD,eff) plotted for the CaV1.3 channel fragments, CaM WT, and CaM G114R under conditions of minimal (grey) or elevated cytosolic Ca2+ (red). (****, p > 0.0001 compared to WT in high Ca2+; #, p = 0.029 compared to apoCaM G114R). Data plotted ± SEM. (D) Proposed mechanism under which endogenous WT CaM (grey) is capable of binding to CaV1.3 and conferring CDI in the presence or absence of nonbinding CaM G114R (orange). In CaV1.3L with the ICDI/CTM (red) present, CDI occurs only when CaM is able to displace ICDI/CTM. Under endogenous expression conditions, CaM expression levels are not sufficient to dislodge ICDI/CTM for the majority of channels, resulting in a reduction in CDI. Overexpression of CaM G114R does not significantly alter this scenario as it cannot compete with ICDI/CTM, however overexpression of CaM WT enhances CDI compared to endogenous CaM via displacement of ICDI/CTM. In contrast, CaM WT, either endogenous or overexpressed, confers robust CDI in the absence of ICDI/CTM in CaV1.343S. Exemplar data above and below is reproduced from Figs. 2, 4 and from (Sang et al., 2021) for CaV1.343s (endogenous CaM) and from (Limpitikul et al., 2016) for CaV1.3L (endogenous CaM) for comparison.
In addition to investigating the interaction between CaM and the CaV1.3 IQ in low and high Ca2+ conditions, we explored the Ca2+-dependence of the interaction of each CaM variant with the channel domain. This was done by monitoring the change in fluorescence anisotropy of the 5-TAMRA-labeled CaV1.3 IQ during titration with CaM at eight different Ca2+-concentrations (Fig. 7), as previously done for the CaV1.2 IQ (Wang 2018; Wang 2020; Brohus 2021). The affinity of CaM WT for CaV1.3 IQ dramatically increased as a function of Ca2+-concentration (Fig. 7A). Likewise, the affinity of all other CaM variants increased with Ca2+-concentration (Fig. 7B-G). As expected, the Ca2+-insensitive variant, CaM1234, retained an apo-affinity for the CaV1.3 IQ across the entire range of Ca2+ concentrations tested, demonstrating its inability to bind Ca2+-ions (Fig. 7H). To summarize the effects of the CaM mutations on the interaction with the CaV1.3 IQ, the complex affinity in apo- and Ca2+-saturating conditions, and its Ca2+-sensitivity were estimated from the EC50 fits (Fig. 7A, bottom panel dashed lines). First, the complex affinities in apo- and Ca2+-saturating conditions were estimated by the initial and final plateaus, respectively (Fig. 7A, horizontal dashed lines and Fig. 7I-J). In support of the FRET experiments, and the hypothesis of reduced channel preassociation, CaM G114R had the largest effect on the apo-affinity (defined by the initial plateau), causing a significant 10-fold reduction compared to CaM WT (Fig. 7I). CaM D130G and D132G significantly reduced the apo-affinity by 2-fold compared to CaM WT. Of note, only CaM F142L caused an increase in the apo-affinity (13-fold compared to CaM WT), in agreement with what has been observed for the CaV1.2 IQ (Wang et al., 2018). In Ca2+ saturating conditions, defined by the final plateau of the EC50 curve, the generally high affinity caused a more variable determination of KD values, in turn causing a less well-defined final plateau compared to the initial plateau (apo-conditions). Despite the higher variability at high Ca2+-concentrations, we tested for significant differences in the CaM/CaV1.3 IQ-domain affinities. CaM D130G reduced the IQ-domain affinity 5.5-fold compared to CaM WT whereas CaM D132G and F142L caused a 3.5- and 2-fold increase, respectively (Fig. 7J). As a measure of the Ca2+-sensitivity of CaM when in complex with the CaV1.3 IQ domain, we determined the Ca2+-concentration causing a half-maximal change in log(KD) (representing binding energy) between the apo- and Ca2+-bound states (EC50) (Fig. 7A, dotted vertical line and Fig. 7K). The EC50-value for CaM WT/CaV1.3 IQ is 400 nM free Ca2+. All C-lobe mutations impaired the Ca2+- sensing of CaM when complexed to the CaV1.3 IQ (2–11-fold) in line with their reduction of C-lobe Ca2+-affinity (Fig. 7K), and consistent with their effect in impairment of CaV1.3 CDI.
Figure 7: CaM mutations impair the Ca2+ sensitivity of CaM in complex with the CaV1.3 IQ domain.

(A-H) Top: exemplar for the variant in question showing the development in fluorescence anisotropy of the TAMRA-labeled CaV1.3 IQ-peptide as a function of CaM concentration. A stoichiometric binding model was fit to the data to produce a binding curve and to determine the affinity of the interaction. Different colors represent different free Ca2+ concentrations, ranging from 3 nM to 0.4 mM. Bottom: The CaM/IQ -peptide affinity (KD) as a function of free Ca2+ concentration (shown as -log10([Ca2+]free)); the variant in question is shown in black with the WT profile shown in grey. For CaM WT (panel A), the dashed horizontal lines illustrate the CaM/IQ-peptide complex affinity at apo (top line) and Ca2+-saturating (bottom line) conditions used to generate the data in panels I and J. The dotted vertical line illustrates the EC50 value plotted in panel K. (I-J) comparison of the CaV1.3 IQ affinity of all CaM variants at apo- and Ca2+-saturating conditions, respectively (shown as log10(KD)). (K) CaM variant Ca2+ sensitivity in the presence of IQ peptide, determined as the EC50 Ca2+ concentration (fit to the change in log10(KD)). Note that for CaM1234, which cannot bind Ca2+ ions, no EC50 curve was fit.
The Impact of Pathological CaM Mutations on CaV2.1 Regulation
Having evaluated the impacts of pathological CaM mutants on CaV1.3, we next turned to investigate the P/Q-type channel, CaV2.1. To do so, we utilized a similar experimental setup as before with CaV2.1 transfected into HEK293 cells along with the mutant CaMs. For CaV2.1, C-lobe mediated CaM regulation takes the form of CDF (DeMaria et al., 2001). To evaluate CDF, we employed a step depolarization, with and without a prepulse at varying potentials. Ca2+ entry during the prepulse initiates CDF, resulting in a larger initial current during the test pulse. To quantify the amount of CDF, the area between the two curves is integrated to give the relative facilitation (RF) value (Fig. 8) (DeMaria et al., 2001; Chaudhuri et al., 2004). As expected for a C-lobe mediated process, the N-lobe CaM mutant N54I did not significantly impair CaV2.1 CDF as compared to WT (Fig. 8B). On the other hand, the C-lobe mutants G114R, D130G, D132G, and F142L all significantly reduced CDF, with G114R and F142L displaying somewhat more moderate effects (Fig. 8D-G). The artificial mutant CaM1234 demonstrates the impact of a complete loss of Ca2+ binding to CaM (Fig. 8H). Interestingly, the C-lobe mutant D96V did not display impaired CDF (Fig. 8C) despite the fact that the mutated residue resides in the third Ca2+ binding EF hand and has been shown to dramatically reduce Ca2+ binding (Limpitikul et al., 2014; Sondergaard et al., 2015b). Finally, evaluation of the normalized current-voltage relationship demonstrated small (<10 mV) shifts in the half maximal voltage of activation of Ca2+ currents for G114R, D132G, and F142L variants relative to WT (Fig. 8, bottom panels).
Figure 8: CaM mutants impair CaV2.1 CDF.

(A-H) Top: Exemplar current traces for CaV2.1 co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant and the β2a accessory subunit. Test depolarization was applied with (dark blue) or without (light blue) a prepulse to 20 mV. Ca2+ currents recorded without a prepulse are normalized to Ca2+ currents with a prepulse, with scale bars referring to prepulse currents. Middle: data displaying RF values for CaV2.1 in Ca2+ (blue) and Ba2+ (black) and the indicated CaM variants recorded at varying test potentials. Listed n values correspond to number of cells in Ca2+ datasets, for each condition, a minimum of four Ba2+ datasets were collected. RF values were compared at 10 mV for each of the CaM variants using a one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test relative to CaM WT (****, p < 0.0001). Data plotted ± SEM. Bottom: Ca2+ current-voltage relationships show small shifts in voltage dependence for CaM G114R, D132G and F142L. Current density plots are normalized to peak.
Given the lack of CDF effect for D96V, we wondered if the affinity of the D96V mutant for CaV2.1 might be impaired as seen for G114R for CaV1.3. As before, we evaluated the capacity of mutant CaMs to bind via FRET. Using a C-terminal fragment of CaV2.1 coupled to a cerulean fluorophore, the donor molecule of the FRET pair was constructed. Similarly, each mutant CaM was ligated to Venus as the acceptor fluorophore. Evaluation of the FRET binding curves to estimate KD,eff under basal Ca2+ conditions revealed that CaM G114R alone displayed significantly altered binding affinity (Fig. 9A-G, Table 2), although the effect was much milder as compared to the binding deficits observed in CaV1.3. Interestingly, CaM1234 displayed a similarly mild but significant increase in KD,eff (Fig. 9J, Table 2), implying that even in the apo state, this form of CaM has diminished binding affinity.
Figure 9: Binding of CaM to CaV2.1.

(A) A CaV2.1 C-terminal channel fragment including the IQ domain as indicated is concatenated with Cerulean. Each CaM variant was generated within a Venus-CaM construct. (B) Measured relative binding efficiencies (KD,eff) plotted for the CaV2.1 channel fragment and CaM variants in low cytosolic Ca2+. Significance was ascertained with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnet’s test for multiple comparisons relative to WT (****, p > 0.0001) (*, p = 0.0142). Data plotted ± SEM. (C-J) FRET binding curves from a live-cell flow cytometric FRET assay for the CaV2.1 channel fragment and indicated CaM variant. Each point reflects the result from an individual cell, with a curve in black (WT) or orange (mutant) fit to estimate effective KD (KD,eff). Data is plotted as a function of free acceptor fluorophore molecules (Afree) and donor-centric FRET efficiency (ED). WT results are reproduced on variant data as the gray dashed curve for comparison.
Table 2: KDeff and EDmax values derived from CaV2.1-CaM FRET interactions.
| Cerulean-CaV2.1 Fragment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaM Variant | Mean KDeff | S.E.M | Mean EDmax | S.E.M. | n |
| WT | 919 | 67.77 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 9 |
| N54I | 929 | 33.90 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 4 |
| D96V | 1027 | 73.5 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 6 |
| G114R | 1508* | 180 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 6 |
| D130G | 1278 | 164.5 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 5 |
| D132G | 1273 | 73.54 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 6 |
| F142L | 1120 | 46.84 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 |
| CaM1234 | 2419**** | 289.6 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 6 |
Mean KDeff and EDmax values for each CaV channel fragment/CaM mutant interaction were compared using one-way ANOVAs, followed by Dunnet’s tests for multiple comparisons relative to WT
(p < 0.05,
p < 0.0001).
Values for n reflect independent experimental samples, each consisting of >2000 cells used to create the FRET binding curves.
FRET values corresponding to Fig. 9
To explore the Ca2+-dependency of the CaM/CaV2.1 IQ interaction, we once again used the fluorescence anisotropy assay (Fig. 10). The affinity of CaM WT for the CaV2.1 IQ dramatically increased with increasing Ca2+-concentration (Fig. 10A). All other CaM variants, except CaM1234, followed the same pattern of increasing complex affinity with Ca2+-concentration (Fig. 10B-H). In the low Ca2+ apo-state, all CaM C-lobe mutations displayed a small but significant reduction in binding affinity for the CaV2.1 IQ domain (1.2- to 2.7-fold compared to CaM WT) (Fig. 10I). Of note, the magnitude of reduction in apo-affinity for CaM G114R towards the CaV2.1 IQ was less than that towards the CaV1.3 IQ (2.7-fold reduction for CaV2.1 IQ vs 10-fold reduction for CaV1.3 IQ). This difference in binding affinity between the two channels supports a lack of apoCaM G114R preassociation with CaV1.3, and thus a lack of effect on CDI, while retaining an effect on CaV2.1 CDF. Similarly to the observation for the apo-affinities, all C-lobe mutations caused a reduction in the affinity of the Ca2+-saturated complex (2- to 14-fold compared to CaM WT) (Fig. 10J). All C-lobe mutations reduced the Ca2+-sensitivity of the complex (1.8- to 4.3-fold compared to CaM WT), in line with their reduction of C-lobe Ca2+- affinity (Fig. 7K), and consistent with their general impairment of CaV2.1 CDF. These results, however, do not explain the distinct effects of D96V observed in functional assays. It is possible that the relatively small CaV2.1 peptide used here and in our FRET assay is not sufficient to elucidate all CaM binding effects.
Figure 10: Calmodulin mutations impair the Ca2+ sensitivity of CaM in complex with the CaV2.1 IQ domain.

(A-H) Top: exemplar for the variant in question showing the development in fluorescence anisotropy of the TAMRA-labeled CaV2.1 IQ-peptide as a function of CaM concentration. A stoichiometric binding model was fit to the data to produce a binding curve and to determine the affinity of the interaction. Different colors represent different free Ca2+ concentrations, ranging from 3 nM to 0.4 mM. Bottom: The CaM/IQ -peptide affinity (KD) as a function of free Ca2+ concentration (shown as -log10([Ca2+]free)); the variant in question is shown in black with the WT profile shown in grey. For CaM WT (panel A), the dashed horizontal lines illustrate the CaM/IQ-peptide complex affinity at apo (top line) and Ca2+-saturating (bottom line) conditions used to generate the data in panels I and J. The dotted vertical line illustrates the EC50 value plotted in panel K. (I-J) comparison of the CaV2.1 IQ affinity of all CaM variants at apo- and Ca2+-saturating conditions, respectively (shown as log10(KD)). (K) Calmodulin variant Ca2+ sensitivity in the presence of IQ peptide, determined as the EC50 Ca2+ concentration (fit to the change in log10(KD)). Note that for CaM1234, which cannot bind Ca2+ ions, no EC50 curve was fitted.
Effect of Mixed Expression of WT and Mutant CaM
While our experiments utilize overexpression, physiologically each calmodulinopathy mutation would be expressed in a single of six CALM genes, resulting in a mix of WT and mutant CaM protein. In order to address the question of whether a mutant CaM would modulate the channel in the context of mixed expression with CaM WT, we co-expressed CaM D130G in a 1:1 ratio with CaM WT and evaluated the CDI and CDF of CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 respectively (Fig. 11). Indeed, this configuration led to an intermediate decrease in CDI of CaV1.3L (Fig. 11A) and CaV1.343S (Fig. 11B), as compared to overexpressed D130G (Figs. 2, 4). Likewise, mixed expression of CaM WT and D130G resulted in intermediate deficits in CDF of CaV2.1 (Fig. 11C vs. Fig. 8). These results are consistent with prior data showing that the effect of mutant CaM on CaV1.2 scaled with the expression of mutant to WT protein (Limpitikul et al., 2014).
Figure 11: CaM mutations impair Ca2+-dependent regulation of channels when co-expressed with WT CaM.

(A) Top: Exemplar current traces for CaV1.3L co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant(s). Ba2+ currents (black) are normalized to Ca2+ currents (red). Scale bars reflect Ca2+ currents. Bottom: population data displaying r1000 values across varying test potentials. n indicates number of cells for both Ca2+ and Ba2+ datasets. f1000 values were compared at 10 mV using one-way ANOVAs, followed by Dunnet’s tests for multiple comparisons relative to WT (* p < 0.05). (B) Top: Exemplar traces for CaV1.343s co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant(s). Ca2+ currents (red) are normalized to Ba2+ currents (black), with scale bars referring to Ca2+. Bottom: data displaying r1000 values across varying test potentials. n indicates number of cells for both Ca2+ and Ba2+ datasets. f1000 values were compared at 10 mV using one-way ANOVAs, followed by Dunnet’s tests for multiple comparisons relative to WT (**** p < 0.0001). (C) Top: Exemplar current traces for CaV2.1 co-transfected with the indicated CaM variant(s). Test depolarization was performed with (dark blue) or without (light blue) a prepulse to 20 mV. Ca2+ currents recorded without a prepulse are normalized to Ca2+ currents with a prepulse, with scale bars referring to prepulse currents. Bottom: data displaying RF values for CaV2.1 in Ca2+ (blue) and Ba2+ (black) and the indicated CaM variant(s) recorded at varying test potentials. n indicates number of cells for both Ca2+ datasets, with n=4 for Ba2+. Data plotted ± SEM. RF values were compared at 20 mV using one-way ANOVAs, followed by Dunnet’s tests for multiple comparisons relative to WT (** p < 0.01). All transfections included the β2a accessory subunit.
Discussion
CaM is known to modulate numerous target proteins, making the pathogenesis of calmodulinopathies complex and multifaceted (Ghosh et al., 2006; Nyegaard et al., 2012; Fukuda et al., 2014; Nomikos et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2014; George, 2015; Boczek et al., 2016). Multiple studies have focused on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the cardiac effects of calmodulinopathies; however, many patients show non-cardiac effects including profound neurological symptoms. Thus, the pathogenesis of this disorder may include targets outside the heart. Prior work has demonstrated that many CaM variants can impair CaV1.2 channel regulation, leading to LQTS (Limpitikul et al., 2014; Limpitikul et al., 2017; Limpitikul et al., 2018). However, CaV1.2 channels, and indeed other CaV channel subtypes, are also widely expressed throughout the body. Importantly, the preassociation with apoCaM that was demonstrated to be important for CaV1.2 pathogenesis (Limpitikul et al., 2014) is shared by other VGCCs, making them particularly vulnerable to CaM mutations which alter Ca2+ binding. Thus, multiple VGCCs may be implicated in the pathogenesis of calmodulinopathies. Here, we show that many CaM mutations can impair the regulation of CaV1.2, CaV1.3, and CaV2.1.
We find that a number of previously identified CaM mutants impair the CDI of CaV1.3 across distinct splice backgrounds. In particular, CaM mutants decrease CDI in CaV1.3L, which possess the modulatory ICDI/CTM domain and is expressed abundantly in the heart and brain. Likewise, these CaM variants impair CDI in CaV1.343s, a variant lacking ICDI/CTM and expressed at higher levels in the brain as compared to the heart (Bock et al., 2011). In the context of CaV2.1, these same CaM mutations modulate CDF, demonstrating a largely conserved mechanism of VGCC dysregulation by calmodulinopathy mutations. Given the critical role of these channels in the brain (Pietrobon, 2010; Catterall et al., 2013; Limpitikul et al., 2016; Pinggera et al., 2017; Nanou et al., 2018; Pinggera et al., 2018), such disruption could contribute to the neurological features of these patients.
The N54I mutation, located in the N-lobe of CaM, provided a useful control for nonspecific effects. Our binding (FRET and fluorescence anisotropy) data (Figs. 5, 7, 9, 10) demonstrates that it is able to readily associate with CaV1.3 and CaV2.1. However, it fails to impair CDI or CDF (Figs. 2, 4, 8). Interestingly, CaV1.3 channels exhibit both N- and C-lobe mediated CDI, thus the N-lobe locus of N54I does not exclude a strong effect on the channel. However, the preservation of CDI and CDF is consistent with prior data showing that N54I has a milder impact on CaM binding to Ca2+ than LQTS-associated mutations shown to act on CaV1.2 (Sondergaard et al., 2015a, Vassilakopoulou, 2015 #1679). Moreover, this lack of VGCC effects aligns with the CPVT phenotype in these patients (Crotti et al., 2023).
The CaM mutations D130G and D132G follow a pattern predicted by prior results in CaV1.2: both are located within or just adjacent to an EF-hand in the C-lobe of CaM and severely impair the Ca2+-dependent regulation of CaV1.3 and CaV2.1. F142L, on the other hand, resides outside the EF-hand coordinating residues, but is critical to the packing and folding of the C-lobe of CaM (Sondergaard et al., 2017). Interestingly, this mutation exhibits a comparable impact on CDI in the context of CaV1.3 (Figs. 2,4) but exhibits a lesser effect on CaV2.1 CDF as compared to the EF-hand mutations (Fig. 8). Thus, the detailed mechanism underlying the loss of CaM regulation may be distinct for F142L. In addition, all three of these mutant CaMs show strong affinity for CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 channel peptides at low Ca2+ levels, indicating preservation of the preassociation feature. However, F142L again differs in that binding to CaV1.3 (Figs. 5, 7) and CaV1.2 (Limpitikul et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018) IQ region is enhanced at low Ca2+ levels (Crotti et al., 2013; Crotti et al., 2023).
The effects of G114R on CaV1.3 deviates from the other mutations. This C-lobe mutation has been shown to impair Ca2+ binding in a similar fashion to other pathogenic mutations, although with less severity as compared to D96V, D130G, D132G or F142L (Brohus et al., 2021). CaM G114R has also been shown to impair CaV1.2 CDI, although to a lesser extent as compared to the LQTS-associated mutants described in this study (Brohus et al., 2021). While these facts might predict a similar impairment of CaV1.3, our data suggest a different result. In CaV1.3L, CaM G114R appears to diminish CDI and increase VDI as compared to overexpressed CaM WT (Figs. 2, 3). However, in CaV1.343s, the mutation has no effect on CDI or VDI (Fig. 4). In addition, our FRET results indicate that CaM G114R does not bind CaV1.3 effectively in the apo state, a result supported by fluorescence anisotropy data which specifically showed a prominent reduction of binding to the CaV1.3 IQ for G114R at low Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 7). Thus, we postulate that CaM G114R does not preassociate with either CaV1.3 splice variant at low Ca2+ concentrations and the results reflect the lower expression of endogenous CaM as compared to our overexpressed CaM WT control. Accordingly, the apparent CDI and VDI changes seen in CaV1.3L can be explained by a mass-action effect (Fig. 6D). Importantly, this mechanism also explains the rapid CDI kinetics of the channel with CaM G114R (Fig. 2D), and the VDI effect (Fig. 3). With both lobes of endogenous CaM available to initiate CDI, the kinetics reflect both the rapid C-lobe mediated CDI combined with the slower N-lobe component (Yang et al., 2002). Moreover, the presence of ICDI/CTM has been shown to enhance channel VDI, explaining the increase in VDI observed in the presence of CaM G114R as the effect of ICDI/CTM binding (Singh et al., 2008; Bock et al., 2011). Similarly, the strong CDI seen in CaV1.343s, which lacks the ICDI/CTM domain, are consistent with the function of endogenous WT CaM (Singh et al., 2008; Sang et al., 2021) in the presence of unbound CaM G114R.
Interestingly, CaM G114R does impair CaV2.1 CDF under our experimental conditions of heterologous overexpression, although to a lesser extent as compared to other C-lobe mutants (Fig. 8D). This result is consistent with the modest reduction in binding affinity with the channel IQ (Figs. 8, 9), as well as the more moderate effect of this mutation on Ca2+ binding (Brohus et al., 2021). This is also reflected in a more moderate effect on Ca2+ sensing in the presence of the CaV2.1 IQ domain, as shown by our fluorescence anisotropy experiments (Fig. 10K). Thus, CaM G114R may not preassociate to the same extent as CaM WT, and CaM G114R retains some Ca2+ sensitivity while bound to the channel, enabling some CDF (Fig. 8). Therefore, our data indicate that CaM G114R likely has minimal impacts on CaV1.3 channel regulation and a modest potential to impair CaV2.1 CDF, highlighting the differential impact a single CaM mutant can have on CaV2.1 vs. CaV1.3.
D96V has been shown to severely impair the ability of CaM to bind Ca2+ (Vassilakopoulou et al., 2015) and has a significant impact on CDI in CaV1.2 (Limpitikul et al., 2014) (Fig. 1) and CaV1.3 (Figs. 2, 4). Although it binds well with both CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 channel fragments in our FRET assay, it fails to impair CaV2.1 CDF (Fig. 7). The unusual discrepancy between CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 channel regulation by CaM D96V is not made clearer by our fluorescence anisotropy results, where it shows a similar profile of Ca2+-dependent binding to a CaV2.1 channel peptide as the other mutants. It is therefore tempting to speculate that this mutation may have an effect on CaM structure that imparts a distinct effect in the context of CaV1.2/1.3 vs. CaV2.1. While such an effect remains to be elucidated, D96V has a documented effect on CaM structure, resulting in an unusual protein conformation that resembles neither apoCaM nor the fully calcified form of the protein (Wang et al., 2018). Interestingly, the structural changes of this mutation appear to be less severe as compared to those of the D130G mutation (Wang et al., 2020), indicating that perhaps CaV2.1 CDF is more amenable to certain structural changes as compared to CaV1.2 or CaV1.3 channels.
Finally, while deficits in CaV channel regulation are frequently characterized as “gain-of-function” (GoF) or “loss-of-function” (LoF) in terms of their impact on Ca2+ influx, the deficits imparted by the CaM mutations we have characterized are not so readily delineated into one of these categories. The same CaM mutation that impairs CaV1.3 CDI, therefore permitting excess Ca2+ influx in what could be termed a GoF, can also impair CaV2.1 CDF, resulting in diminished cytosolic Ca2+ and therefore a LoF. Due to these divergent impacts on two prevalent CaM targets, the effect of CaM mutations on overall Ca2+ signaling is likely to be multifaceted.
Overall, this study presents evidence that mutations in CaM can impact multiple VGCCs, expanding our knowledge of the potential pathogenic mechanisms underlying calmodulinopathies. The impact of CaM mutations on VGCC function incorporates many of the same principles identified in the disruption of CaV1.2 CDI leading to severe LQTS, where VGCCs likely represent vulnerable targets due to preassociation with CaM at low Ca2+ levels. Overall, disruption of VGCCs may represent an important component of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying calmodulinopathies both within and beyond the heart.
Materials and Methods
Transfection and molecular biology for electrophysiology
For electrophysiological experiments, a plasmid encoding a human α1C channel variant containing exon 8a was employed for CaV1.2 (Z34810) (Dick et al., 2008). Plasmids encoding a human α1D channel variant containing exons 8a and 42 was employed for CaV1.3L (EU363339) and a variant terminating in exon 43 was employed for CaV1.3 43s (NM_001128839) (Sang et al., 2021). These plasmids were generously provided by Dr. Jörg Striessnig (University of Innsbruck). A plasmid encoding an α1A channel variant including exons 43 and 44 and excluding exon 47, originally provided by Dr. Terrance Snutch (University of British Columbia), was employed for CaV2.1 (NM_001127221) (Lee et al., 2015). Each of these was within a pcDNA3 expression vector. For these same experiments, human CALM1 cDNA within the pIRES2-EGFP vector was utilized for WT CaM (Clontech Laboratories). From this WT CaM-pIRES-EGFP construct, pathogenic CaM mutations were generated using QuikChange Lightning™ site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent). 8 μg each of human α1 cDNA, rat brain β2a (M_80545) or rat brain β1b (X61394), rat brain α2δ (NM_012919.3) subunits, and WT or mutant CaM were heterologously co-expressed. For all recordings, β2a was used unless otherwise specified. Expression was enhanced with 2 μg of simian virus 40 T antigen (Tag) cDNA. Expression of all plasmids was under the control of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. HEK293 cells were cultured in 10-cm dishes on glass coverslips, and channels were transfected using an established Ca2+ phosphate method (Peterson et al., 1999). Data from each experimental condition were gathered from a minimum of two independent transfections.
Patch clamp recordings
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of HEK 293 cells were carried out 1–2 days post-transfection at ambient temperature. An Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments) was utilized to generate the recordings. Noise in these recordings was minimized via a lowpass filter at 2 kHz, followed by digital sampling at 10 kHz. Pipette resistances were 1.5–5 MΩ and P/8 leak subtraction was used. Internal solutions contained (in mM): CsMeSO3, 114; CsCl, 5; MgCl2, 1; MgATP, 4; HEPES (pH 7.4), 10; and BAPTA, 10; at 295 mOsm adjusted with CsMeSO3. External solutions contained (in mM): TEA-MeSO3, 140; HEPES (pH 7.4), 10; and CaCl2 or BaCl2, 40; at 300 mOsm, adjusted with TEA-MeSO3. These solutions produced the following uncorrected junction potentials: 10 BAPTA/40 Ca2+: 10.5 mV; 10 BAPTA/40 Ba2+: 10.2 mV. Note that the use of 10 BAPTA limits Ca2+ to only the local signal due to entry through the channel (Dick et al., 2008). For CaV2.1, this manipulation restricts CaM regulation to C-lobe mediated CDF (Ben-Johny and Dick, 2022), reducing the confounding effect of N-lobe mediated CDI in our CDF measurements. However, it should be noted that this manipulation also reduces the ability to observe N-lobe effects, thus the N54 mutation is used largely as a negative control under these conditions.
Quantification of patch clamp data
For r300 Ca2+ data in CaV1.2/CaM experiments, a ratio of peak current during a step depolarization to 30 mV to the current remaining following 300 ms was employed for each CaM variant. For each cell, this value was subtracted from the analogous value for Ba2+ at 30 mV, resulting in an f300 value that quantified CDI. For both sets of CaV1.3/CaM datasets, similar comparisons were employed, with the following differences: currents were compared at 10 mV step depolarizations, and the 1000 ms depolarization timepoint was used resulting in f1000 values. For experiments investigating CaV1.3/CaM VDI, r1000 values acquired during Ba2+ depolarizations were used to estimate VDI.
For CaV2.1/CaM experiments, CDF was characterized by comparing Ca2+ currents during depolarizing voltage steps to 10 mV in the presence and absence of a prepulse which was sufficient to partially facilitate the channel (DeMaria et al., 2001; Chaudhuri et al., 2004). To adjust for variations in current density each sweep is normalized relative to the end of the 50 ms test pulse. This timepoint is chosen such that CDF is complete and CDI is minimal. ΔQ is quantified as the area between the currents with and without the pre-pulse. In order to normalize for the time course of facilitation, ΔQ is divided by the time constant of the curve without the prepulse τ, giving an approximation of the degree of CDF triggered by the prepulse, termed relative facilitation (RF). In cases where the lack of CDF led to an absence of a monoexponential curve to derive τ from, τ was set as the average value from WT dataset (8.5). Data from prepulses to 20 mV were used for statistical comparisons.
To evaluate voltage-dependence of activation, Ca2+ current densities of each variant were plotted as function of depolarization voltage. Data for each cell was normalized to peak value and averaged across cells. Data points were fit by the curve Y=Gmax*(X-Vrev)/(1+exp((V50-X)/Slope)). The half maximal voltage of activation was calculated from these curves.
Statistics:
For CaV1.2, the f300 value from each cell was averaged for the mutant condition and compared to the WT data via a Student’s t-test. For all patch clamp experiments where more than one mutant was being compared to WT (CaV1.3 and CaV2.1), the relevant values were compared via one-way ANOVAs using Dunnet’s multiple comparison corrections, with each mutant being compared to WT. Data from individual cells was excluded from analysis if peak Ca2+ currents were below 150 pA, if excessive leak current (>150 pA) was present, or if series resistance exceeded 10 MΩ. For comparisons of half maximal voltage of activation, a sum-of-squares F test was employed with a threshold p value = 0.05.
Generation of FRET constructs
The principles underlying flow cytometric FRET having been previously established (Ben-Johny et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Rivas et al., 2021). Venus-CaM plasmids correspond to those described previously (Ben-Johny et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Niu et al., 2018). QuikChange Lightning mutagenesis (Aligent) was employed to create the Venus-CaM mutants of interest. For CaV1.3, the C-terminal fragment (DNFDY…VGKYP) was ligated into a pcDNA3 expression vector containing an upstream Cerulean fluorophore. The DNA template encoding the CaV1.3 fragment as well as XbaI and NotI restriction digest sites at positions flanking the coding sequence was purchased (Twist Bioscience). Using this template, digestion with these enzymes was carried out, followed by ligation into the expression vector using T3 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs). To ensure expression and read-through, the Cerulean fluorophore was preceded by a CMV promotor, and an in-frame short linker sequence of alanine was present between the end of the Cerulean sequence and before the CaV1.3 fragment. At the end of the CaV1.3 fragment was a stop codon to create the fusion protein suitable for FRET. The same procedure was employed to generate the Cerulean/CaV2.1 construct, with the CaV2.1 sequence (DNFEY…EOGPP) inserted into the vector. Dimers linking Cerulean and Venus of various lengths (C5V, C32V, C40V, CTV) were utilized as previously described (Ben-Johny et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Rivas et al., 2021). All constructs were verified by sequencing (Plasmidsaurus).
Transfection of FRET constructs
Cells were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with FRET constructs and fluorophore pairs using a PEI protocol (Longo et al., 2013). 48 hours post-transfection, cells were treated with 100 μM cycloheximide for 2–4 hours to reduce incidence of immature fluorophores, and were then harvested and resuspended in Tyrode’s solution with minimal Ca2+. For experiments involving calcified CaM, 10 mM CaCl2 was added to equal volumes of cell suspension along with 4 μM ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich I0634).
FRET data collection
To estimate binding curves and KD,eff for each of the donor-acceptor pairs, fluorescence measurements are acquired from three filters within the flow cytometer, specifically selected to detect donor, acceptor, and FRET signals. This technique, termed 33-FRET, permits the isolation of FRET signal from donor and acceptor signals (Erickson et al., 2001). This methodology required evaluation of instrument-specific properties during each experimental run, evaluated using a series of linked Cerulean/Venus dimers such that a 1:1 stoichiometry of each fluorophore was ensured (Ben-Johny et al., 2016). Moreover, Venus and Cerulean fluorophores, individually and co-expressed, were measured to permit evaluation of non-specific fluorescence that could confound FRET analysis. Cells were kept in Normal Tyrodes solution for recording containing (in mM): NaCl, 138; KCl, 4; MgCl2, 1; HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 at 300 mOsm adjusted with NaOH. External solutions contained (in mM): TEA-MeSO3, 140; HEPES (pH 7.4), For high-Ca2+ conditions, external Ca2+ was increased to 4 mM and 10 µM Ionomycin was added to facilitate Ca2+ entry into cells prior to recording.
Statistics:
Analysis of flow cytometric FRET was performed as previously described (Ben-Johny et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Rivas et al., 2021) . Net decreases in donor fluorescence due to FRET was computed from the signals from each of the specific filter cubes utilized. These decreases are analogous to FRET efficiencies acquired from acceptor photobleaching or donor quenching approaches, and correspond to the donor-specific FRET measurement, ED. For each of the >2000 cells within each sample, ED was plotted against the concentration of unbound acceptor molecules (Afree) in order to generate a binding curve, and effective KD (KD,eff) was then calculated from this curve. KD,eff values from each FRET experiment were compared using one-way ANOVAs using Dunnet’s multiple comparison corrections, with each mutant being compared to WT. Data were analyzed by custom MATLAB software (Ben Johny, 2020) (Mathworks, MA).
Fluorescence Anisotropy Binding Assays
Peptides representative of the CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 IQ-domains were N-terminally labeled with a 5-TAMRA fluorophore (CaV1.3: 5-TAMRA- DEVTVGKFYATFLIQDYFRKFKKRKEQGLVGKYP-NH2, CaV2.1:_5-TAMRA-TDLTVGKIYAAMMIMEYYRQSKAKKLQAMREEQD-NH2; Proteogenix, purity > 95%). Using a previously described 384-well plate-based assay (Brohus et al., 2019), CaM was titrated across the 24 columns at 8 different free calcium concentrations (3 nM to 400 µM), one per row (Brohus et al., 2021). The change in fluorescence anisotropy (FA) of the TAMRA-labeled IQ-domains, a measure of their tumbling rate, was monitored as a function of CaM concentration. This setup resulted in 8 CaM/IQ-domain binding curves, each representing binding at a specific free Ca2+ concentration.
A stoichiometric binding model was fitted to each binding curve to determine the CaM/IQ-domain binding affinity (represented by the dissociation constant, KD) at each Ca2+ concentration (Jensen et al., 2024):
Where KD is the dissociation constant, and [IQ-domain] and [CaM] is the total concentration of the 5-TAMRA-labeled IQ-domain and CaM, respectively. All model parameters (FAinitial, FAspan, KD, and [IQ domain]) were fitted with constraints that all parameters be above zero. In the case of CaV1.3 IQ, binding curves for CaM G114R did not reach an upper plateau at low Ca2+- concentrations; thus, curve spans from CaM WT were assumed for these curves to determine the apo-affinity (i.e. the FAspan parameter for these binding curves was kept constant equal to 583 the WT parameter).
Affinities and Ca2+ concentrations were log10-transformed before fitting an EC50 curve:
Due to the high CaM/CaV1.3 IQ-domain affinity at high Ca2+-concentrations, KD values were difficult to determine robustly between replicates. For this reason, all determined KD values from all replicates were combined to provide enough data points to fit the EC50 model. From the EC50 model, the fitted initial plateau (at low Ca2+-concentrations) was extracted to represent the apo-affinity, and the fitted final plateau (at high Ca2+-concentrations) was extracted to represent the CaM/CaV IQ-domain affinity at saturating Ca2+-concentrations (Fig. 7A, lower panel horizontal stapled lines). The fitted EC50 values were extracted to represent the Ca2+-concentration that provides the half-maximal change in logKD (binding energy) between the apo- and Ca2+-bound states – a measure of the Ca2+-sensitivity of the interaction (Fig. 7A, lower panel vertical stapled line). In summary, the assay provides information on the Ca2+-dependency of the CaM/IQ-domain interaction across the physiologically relevant Ca2+-concentration span.
Statistics:
Curve fitting and data plotting was done using a custom-written script pipeline in R (v. R-4.2.1). Statistical testing was done on log10-transformed affinities and EC50-values in GraphPad Prism 6 (v. 6.07) using a one-way ANOVA (WT as reference) with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Significance levels were indicated by asterisks: **** (p-value < 600 0.0001), *** (p-value < 0.001), * (p-value < 0.05).
Supplementary Material
Online Supplementary Material
All data underlying each figure is contained within the online supplementary dataset.
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of Dr. Dick’s lab for helpful suggestions and discussion of the project. We also thank Josiah Owoyemi and Emma Gudmundsson for dedicated technical support. This work was supported by grants from the National institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS127294 to IED) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL149926 to IED).
Data Availability
All data are available in the article itself and its supplementary materials
References
- Badone B, Ronchi C, Kotta MC, Sala L, Ghidoni A, Crotti L, and Zaza A. 2018. Calmodulinopathy: Functional Effects of CALM Mutations and Their Relationship With Clinical Phenotypes. Front Cardiovasc Med. 5:176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bamgboye MA, Herold KG, Vieira DCO, Traficante MK, Rogers PJ, Ben-Johny M, and Dick IE. 2022. CaV1.2 channelopathic mutations evoke diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. J Gen Physiol. 154:e202213209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Johny M, and Dick IE. 2022. Calmodulin Regulation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels. In Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels. Zamponi GW, Weiss N. , editor. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Johny M, Yue DN, and Yue DT. 2016. Detecting stoichiometry of macromolecular complexes in live cells using FRET. Nat Commun. 7:13709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben Johny M 2020. Analysis Software for Flow Cytometry FRET. In. GitHub, https://github.com/manubenjohny/FACS_FRET.git. [Google Scholar]
- Bock G, Gebhart M, Scharinger A, Jangsangthong W, Busquet P, Poggiani C, Sartori S, Mangoni ME, Sinnegger-Brauns MJ, Herzig S, Striessnig J, and Koschak A. 2011. Functional properties of a newly identified C-terminal splice variant of Cav1.3 L-type Ca2+ channels. J Biol Chem. 286:42736–42748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boczek NJ, Gomez-Hurtado N, Ye D, Calvert ML, Tester DJ, Kryshtal D, Hwang HS, Johnson CN, Chazin WJ, Loporcaro CG, Shah M, Papez AL, Lau YR, Kanter R, Knollmann BC, and Ackerman MJ. 2016. Spectrum and Prevalence of CALM1-, CALM2-, and CALM3-Encoded Calmodulin Variants in Long QT Syndrome and Functional Characterization of a Novel Long QT Syndrome-Associated Calmodulin Missense Variant, E141 G. Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics. 9:136–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brehm P, and Eckert R. 1978. Calcium entry leads to inactivation of calcium channel in Paramecium. Science. 202:1203–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brohus M, Arsov T, Wallace DA, Jensen HH, Nyegaard M, Crotti L, Adamski M, Zhang Y, Field MA, Athanasopoulos V, Baro I, Ribeiro de Oliveira-Mendes BB, Redon R, Charpentier F, Raju H, DiSilvestre D, Wei J, Wang R, Rafehi H, Kaspi A, Bahlo M, Dick IE, Chen SRW, Cook MC, Vinuesa CG, Overgaard MT, and Schwartz PJ. 2021. Infanticide vs. inherited cardiac arrhythmias. Europace. 23:441–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brohus M, Sondergaard MT, Wayne Chen SR, van Petegem F, and Overgaard MT. 2019. Ca(2+)-dependent calmodulin binding to cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) calmodulin-binding domains. Biochem J. 476:193–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catterall WA, Leal K, and Nanou E. 2013. Calcium channels and short-term synaptic plasticity. J Biol Chem. 288:10742–10749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhuri D, Chang SY, DeMaria CD, Alvania RS, Soong TW, and Yue DT. 2004. Alternative splicing as a molecular switch for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent facilitation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. J Neurosci. 24:6334–6342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clemens DJ, Gray B, Bagnall RD, Tester DJ, Giudicessi JR, Maleszewski JJ, Crotti L, Schwartz PJ, Matthews E, Semsarian C, Behr ER, and Ackerman MJ. 2020. Prevalence and Phenotypic Correlations of Calmodulinopathy-Causative CALM1–3 Variants Detected in a Multicenter Molecular Autopsy Cohort of Sudden Unexplained Death Victims. Circ Genom Precis Med. 13:e003032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crotti L, Johnson CN, Graf E, De Ferrari GM, Cuneo BF, Ovadia M, Papagiannis J, Feldkamp MD, Rathi SG, Kunic JD, Pedrazzini M, Wieland T, Lichtner P, Beckmann BM, Clark T, Shaffer C, Benson DW, Kaab S, Meitinger T, Strom TM, Chazin WJ, Schwartz PJ, and George AL Jr. 2013. Calmodulin mutations associated with recurrent cardiac arrest in infants. Circulation. 127:1009–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crotti L, Spazzolini C, Nyegaard M, Overgaard MT, Kotta MC, Dagradi F, Sala L, Aiba T, Ayers MD, Baban A, Barc J, Beach CM, Behr ER, Bos JM, Cerrone M, Covi P, Cuneo B, Denjoy I, Donner B, Elbert A, Eliasson H, Etheridge SP, Fukuyama M, Girolami F, Hamilton R, Horie M, Iascone M, Jimenez-Jaimez J, Jensen HK, Kannankeril PJ, Kaski JP, Makita N, Munoz-Esparza C, Odland HH, Ohno S, Papagiannis J, Porretta AP, Prandstetter C, Probst V, Robyns T, Rosenthal E, Roses-Noguer F, Sekarski N, Singh A, Spentzou G, Stute F, Tfelt-Hansen J, Till J, Tobert KE, Vinocur JM, Webster G, Wilde AAM, Wolf CM, Ackerman MJ, and Schwartz PJ. 2023. Clinical presentation of calmodulin mutations: the International Calmodulinopathy Registry. Eur Heart J. 44:3357–3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crotti L, Spazzolini C, Tester DJ, Ghidoni A, Baruteau AE, Beckmann BM, Behr ER, Bennett JS, Bezzina CR, Bhuiyan ZA, Celiker A, Cerrone M, Dagradi F, De Ferrari GM, Etheridge SP, Fatah M, Garcia-Pavia P, Al-Ghamdi S, Hamilton RM, Al-Hassnan ZN, Horie M, Jimenez-Jaimez J, Kanter RJ, Kaski JP, Kotta MC, Lahrouchi N, Makita N, Norrish G, Odland HH, Ohno S, Papagiannis J, Parati G, Sekarski N, Tveten K, Vatta M, Webster G, Wilde AAM, Wojciak J, George AL, Ackerman MJ, and Schwartz PJ. 2019. Calmodulin mutations and life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias: insights from the International Calmodulinopathy Registry. Eur Heart J. 40:2964–2975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeMaria CD, Soong TW, Alseikhan BA, Alvania RS, and Yue DT. 2001. Calmodulin bifurcates the local Ca2+ signal that modulates P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. Nature. 411:484–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dick IE, Joshi-Mukherjee R, Yang W, and Yue DT. 2016. Arrhythmogenesis in Timothy Syndrome is associated with defects in Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation. Nat Commun. 7:10370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dick IE, Tadross MR, Liang H, Tay LH, Yang W, and Yue DT. 2008. A modular switch for spatial Ca2+ selectivity in the calmodulin regulation of CaV channels. Nature. 451:830–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erickson MG, Alseikhan BA, Peterson BZ, and Yue DT. 2001. Preassociation of calmodulin with voltage-gated Ca2+ channels revealed by FRET in single living cells. Neuron. 31:973–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erickson MG, Liang H, Mori MX, and Yue DT. 2003. FRET two-hybrid mapping reveals function and location of L-type Ca2+ channel CaM preassociation. Neuron. 39:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folacci M, Estaran S, Menard C, Bertaud A, Rousset M, Roussel J, Thibaud JB, Vignes M, Chavanieu A, Charnet P, and Cens T. 2023. Functional Characterization of Four Known Cav2.1 Variants Associated with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Membranes (Basel). 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuda M, Yamamoto T, Nishimura S, Kato T, Murakami W, Hino A, Ono M, Tateishi H, Oda T, Okuda S, Kobayashi S, Koseki N, Kyushiki H, and Yano M. 2014. Enhanced binding of calmodulin to RyR2 corrects arrhythmogenic channel disorder in CPVT-associated myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 448:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George AL Jr. 2015. Calmodulinopathy: a genetic trilogy. Heart Rhythm. 12:423–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S, Nunziato DA, and Pitt GS. 2006. KCNQ1 assembly and function is blocked by long-QT syndrome mutations that disrupt interaction with calmodulin. Circ Res. 98:1048–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hell JW, Westenbroek RE, Warner C, Ahlijanian MK, Prystay W, Gilbert MM, Snutch TP, and Catterall WA. 1993. Identification and differential subcellular localization of the neuronal class C and class D L-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunits. J Cell Biol. 123:949–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussey JW, Limpitikul WB, and Dick IE. 2023. Calmodulin Mutations in Human Disease. Channels (Austin). 17:2165278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang HS, Nitu FR, Yang Y, Walweel K, Pereira L, Johnson CN, Faggioni M, Chazin WJ, Laver D, George AL Jr., Cornea RL, Bers DM, and Knollmann BC. 2014. Divergent regulation of ryanodine receptor 2 calcium release channels by arrhythmogenic human calmodulin missense mutants. Circ Res. 114:1114–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Indelicato E, Nachbauer W, Karner E, Eigentler A, Wagner M, Unterberger I, Poewe W, Delazer M, and Boesch S. 2019. The neuropsychiatric phenotype in CACNA1A mutations: a retrospective single center study and review of the literature. Eur J Neurol. 26:66–e67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen HH, Brohus M, Hussey JW, Busuioc A-O, Iversen ED, Darki F, Nikolova GD, Baisgaard AE, Rohde PD, Holm IEG, McQuillin A, Moos T, Dick IE, Overgaard MT, and Nyegaard M. 2024. Calmodulin variants in schizophrenia patients display gain-of-function or loss-of-function effects. medRxiv.2024.2005.2022.24307674. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen HH, Brohus M, Nyegaard M, and Overgaard MT. 2018. Human Calmodulin Mutations. Front Mol Neurosci. 11:396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang PW, Chakouri N, Diaz J, Tomaselli GF, Yue DT, and Ben-Johny M. 2021. Elementary mechanisms of calmodulin regulation of NaV1.5 producing divergent arrhythmogenic phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaplanis J, Samocha KE, Wiel L, Zhang Z, Arvai KJ, Eberhardt RY, Gallone G, Lelieveld SH, Martin HC, McRae JF, Short PJ, Torene RI, de Boer E, Danecek P, Gardner EJ, Huang N, Lord J, Martincorena I, Pfundt R, Reijnders MRF, Yeung A, Yntema HG, Deciphering Developmental Disorders S, Vissers L, Juusola J, Wright CF, Brunner HG, Firth HV, FitzPatrick DR, Barrett JC, Hurles ME, Gilissen C, and Retterer K. 2020. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature. 586:757–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramer AA, Bennett DF, Barañano KW, and Bannister RA. 2023. A neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a dysfunctional CACNA1A allele. eNeurologicalSci. 31:100456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledford HA, Park S, Muir D, Woltz RL, Ren L, Nguyen PT, Sirish P, Wang W, Sihn CR, George AL, Knollmann BC, Yamoah EN, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Zhang XD, and Chiamvimonvat N. 2020. Different arrhythmia-associated calmodulin mutations have distinct effects on cardiac SK channel regulation. J Gen Physiol. 152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee A, Wong ST, Gallagher D, Li B, Storm DR, Scheuer T, and Catterall WA. 1999. Ca2+/calmodulin binds to and modulates P/Q-type calcium channels. Nature. 399:155–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SR, Adams PJ, and Yue DT. 2015. Large Ca(2)(+)-dependent facilitation of Ca(V)2.1 channels revealed by Ca(2)(+) photo-uncaging. J Physiol. 593:2753–2778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SR, Sang L, and Yue DT. 2016. Uncovering Aberrant Mutant PKA Function with Flow Cytometric FRET. Cell Rep. 14:3019–3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieb A, Scharinger A, Sartori S, Sinnegger-Brauns MJ, and Striessnig J. 2012. Structural determinants of CaV1.3 L-type calcium channel gating. Channels (Austin). 6:197–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Limpitikul WB, Dick IE, Ben-Johny M, and Yue DT. 2016. An autism-associated mutation in CaV1.3 channels has opposing effects on voltage- and Ca(2+)-dependent regulation. Sci Rep. 6:27235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Limpitikul WB, Dick IE, Joshi-Mukherjee R, Overgaard MT, George AL Jr., and Yue DT. 2014. Calmodulin mutations associated with long QT syndrome prevent inactivation of cardiac L-type Ca(2+) currents and promote proarrhythmic behavior in ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 74:115–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Limpitikul WB, Dick IE, Tester DJ, Boczek NJ, Limphong P, Yang W, Choi MH, Babich J, DiSilvestre D, Kanter RJ, Tomaselli GF, Ackerman MJ, and Yue DT. 2017. A Precision Medicine Approach to the Rescue of Function on Malignant Calmodulinopathic Long-QT Syndrome. Circ Res. 120:39–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Limpitikul WB, Greenstein JL, Yue DT, Dick IE, and Winslow RL. 2018. A bilobal model of Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation to probe the physiology of L-type Ca(2+) channels. J Gen Physiol. 150:1688–1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Yang PS, Yang W, and Yue DT. 2010. Enzyme-inhibitor-like tuning of Ca(2+) channel connectivity with calmodulin. Nature. 463:968–972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longo PA, Kavran JM, Kim MS, and Leahy DJ. 2013. Transient mammalian cell transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI). Methods Enzymol. 529:227–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nanou E, Lee A, and Catterall WA. 2018. Control of Excitation/Inhibition Balance in a Hippocampal Circuit by Calcium Sensor Protein Regulation of Presynaptic Calcium Channels. J Neurosci. 38:4430–4440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu J, Yang W, Yue DT, Inoue T, and Ben-Johny M. 2018. Duplex signaling by CaM and Stac3 enhances Ca(V)1.1 function and provides insights into congenital myopathy. J Gen Physiol. 150:1145–1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nomikos M, Thanassoulas A, Beck K, Vassilakopoulou V, Hu H, Calver BL, Theodoridou M, Kashir J, Blayney L, Livaniou E, Rizkallah P, Nounesis G, and Lai FA. 2014. Altered RyR2 regulation by the calmodulin F90L mutation associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and early sudden cardiac death. FEBS Lett. 588:2898–2902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyegaard M, and Overgaard MT. 2019. The International Calmodulinopathy Registry: recording the diverse phenotypic spectrum of un-CALM hearts. Eur Heart J. 40:2976–2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyegaard M, Overgaard MT, Sondergaard MT, Vranas M, Behr ER, Hildebrandt LL, Lund J, Hedley PL, Camm AJ, Wettrell G, Fosdal I, Christiansen M, and Borglum AD. 2012. Mutations in calmodulin cause ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death. Am J Hum Genet. 91:703–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson BZ, DeMaria CD, Adelman JP, and Yue DT. 1999. Calmodulin is the Ca2+ sensor for Ca2+ - dependent inactivation of L-type calcium channels. Neuron. 22:549–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pietrobon D 2010. CaV2.1 channelopathies. Pflugers Arch. 460:375–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinggera A, Lieb A, Benedetti B, Lampert M, Monteleone S, Liedl KR, Tuluc P, and Striessnig J. 2015. CACNA1D de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders activate Cav1.3 L-type calcium channels. Biological psychiatry. 77:816–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinggera A, Mackenroth L, Rump A, Schallner J, Beleggia F, Wollnik B, and Striessnig J. 2017. New gain-of-function mutation shows CACNA1D as recurrently mutated gene in autism spectrum disorders and epilepsy. Hum Mol Genet. 26:2923–2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinggera A, Negro G, Tuluc P, Brown MJ, Lieb A, and Striessnig J. 2018. Gating defects of disease-causing de novo mutations in Cav1.3 Ca(2+) channels. Channels (Austin). 12:388–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin N, Olcese R, Bransby M, Lin T, and Birnbaumer L. 1999. Ca2+-induced inhibition of the cardiac Ca2+ channel depends on calmodulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:2435–2438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reed GJ, Boczek NJ, Etheridge SP, and Ackerman MJ. 2015. CALM3 mutation associated with long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 12:419–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivas S, Hanif K, Chakouri N, and Ben-Johny M. 2021. Probing ion channel macromolecular interactions using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Methods Enzymol. 653:319–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sang L, Vieira DCO, Yue DT, Ben-Johny M, and Dick IE. 2021. The molecular basis of the inhibition of CaV1 calcium-dependent inactivation by the distal carboxy tail. J Biol Chem. 296:100502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A, Gebhart M, Fritsch R, Sinnegger-Brauns MJ, Poggiani C, Hoda JC, Engel J, Romanin C, Striessnig J, and Koschak A. 2008. Modulation of voltage- and Ca2+-dependent gating of CaV1.3 L-type calcium channels by alternative splicing of a C-terminal regulatory domain. J Biol Chem. 283:20733–20744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A, Hamedinger D, Hoda JC, Gebhart M, Koschak A, Romanin C, and Striessnig J. 2006. C-terminal modulator controls Ca2+-dependent gating of Ca(v)1.4 L-type Ca2+ channels. Nat Neurosci. 9:1108–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sondergaard MT, Liu Y, Guo W, Wei J, Wang R, Brohus M, Overgaard MT, and Chen SRW. 2020. Role of cardiac ryanodine receptor calmodulin-binding domains in mediating the action of arrhythmogenic calmodulin N-domain mutation N54I. FEBS J. 287:2256–2280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sondergaard MT, Liu Y, Larsen KT, Nani A, Tian X, Holt C, Wang R, Wimmer R, Van Petegem F, Fill M, Chen SR, and Overgaard MT. 2017. The Arrhythmogenic Calmodulin p.Phe142Leu Mutation Impairs C-domain Ca2+ Binding but Not Calmodulin-dependent Inhibition of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor. J Biol Chem. 292:1385–1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sondergaard MT, Sorensen AB, Skov LL, Kjaer-Sorensen K, Bauer MC, Nyegaard M, Linse S, Oxvig C, and Overgaard MT. 2015a. Calmodulin mutations causing catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia confer opposing functional and biophysical molecular changes. FEBS J. 282:803–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sondergaard MT, Tian X, Liu Y, Wang R, Chazin WJ, Chen SR, and Overgaard MT. 2015b. Arrhythmogenic Calmodulin Mutations Affect the Activation and Termination of Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor-mediated Ca2+ Release. J Biol Chem. 290:26151–26162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan BZ, Jiang F, Tan MY, Yu D, Huang H, Shen Y, and Soong TW. 2011. Functional characterization of alternative splicing in the C terminus of L-type CaV1.3 channels. J Biol Chem. 286:42725–42735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timothy KW, Bauer R, Larkin KA, Walsh EP, Abrams DJ, Gonzalez Corcia C, Valsamakis A, Pitt GS, Dick IE, and Golden A. 2024. A Natural History Study of Timothy Syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 19:433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vassilakopoulou V, Calver BL, Thanassoulas A, Beck K, Hu H, Buntwal L, Smith A, Theodoridou M, Kashir J, Blayney L, Livaniou E, Nounesis G, Lai FA, and Nomikos M. 2015. Distinctive malfunctions of calmodulin mutations associated with heart RyR2-mediated arrhythmic disease. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1850:2168–2176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahl-Schott C, Baumann L, Cuny H, Eckert C, Griessmeier K, and Biel M. 2006. Switching off calcium-dependent inactivation in L-type calcium channels by an autoinhibitory domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:15657–15662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K, Brohus M, Holt C, Overgaard MT, Wimmer R, and Van Petegem F. 2020. Arrhythmia mutations in calmodulin can disrupt cooperativity of Ca(2+) binding and cause misfolding. J Physiol. 598:1169–1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K, Holt C, Lu J, Brohus M, Larsen KT, Overgaard MT, Wimmer R, and Van Petegem F. 2018. Arrhythmia mutations in calmodulin cause conformational changes that affect interactions with the cardiac voltage-gated calcium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115:E10556-E10565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westerlund AM, and Delemotte L. 2018. Effect of Ca2+ on the promiscuous target-protein binding of calmodulin. PLoS Comput Biol. 14:e1006072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, McBride S, Mak DO, Vardi N, Palczewski K, Haeseleer F, and Foskett JK. 2002. Identification of a family of calcium sensors as protein ligands of inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca(2+) release channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:7711–7716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang PS, Alseikhan BA, Hiel H, Grant L, Mori MX, Yang W, Fuchs PA, and Yue DT. 2006. Switching of Ca2+-dependent inactivation of Ca(v)1.3 channels by calcium binding proteins of auditory hair cells. J Neurosci. 26:10677–10689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin G, Hassan F, Haroun AR, Murphy LL, Crotti L, Schwartz PJ, George AL, and Satin J. 2014. Arrhythmogenic calmodulin mutations disrupt intracellular cardiomyocyte Ca2+ regulation by distinct mechanisms. J Am Heart Assoc. 3:e000996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahavich L, Tarnopolsky M, Yao R, and Mital S. 2018. Novel Association of a De Novo CALM2 Mutation With Long QT Syndrome and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Genom Precis Med. 11:e002255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuhlke RD, Pitt GS, Deisseroth K, Tsien RW, and Reuter H. 1999. Calmodulin supports both inactivation and facilitation of L-type calcium channels. Nature. 399:159–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in the article itself and its supplementary materials
