Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2013 Feb 11;288(15):10742–10749. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.411645

Calcium Channels and Short-term Synaptic Plasticity*

William A Catterall 1,1, Karina Leal 1, Evanthia Nanou 1
PMCID: PMC3624454  PMID: 23400776

Abstract

Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in presynaptic nerve terminals initiate neurotransmitter release in response to depolarization by action potentials from the nerve axon. The strength of synaptic transmission is dependent on the third to fourth power of Ca2+ entry, placing the Ca2+ channels in a unique position for regulation of synaptic strength. Short-term synaptic plasticity regulates the strength of neurotransmission through facilitation and depression on the millisecond time scale and plays a key role in encoding information in the nervous system. CaV2.1 channels are the major source of Ca2+ entry for neurotransmission in the central nervous system. They are tightly regulated by Ca2+, calmodulin, and related Ca2+ sensor proteins, which cause facilitation and inactivation of channel activity. Emerging evidence reviewed here points to this mode of regulation of CaV2.1 channels as a major contributor to short-term synaptic plasticity of neurotransmission and its diversity among synapses.

Keywords: Calcium, Calcium-binding Proteins, Calcium Channels, Calcium Signaling, Neurobiology, Synapses, Synaptic Plasticity

Introduction

Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ (termed CaV) channels at presynaptic nerve terminals is an essential step in neurotransmission and plays a crucial role in short-term synaptic plasticity. The CaV2 subfamily is predominant in initiating synaptic transmission at fast conventional synapses (1–3). Multiple mechanisms modulate the function of presynaptic CaV2 channels and thereby regulate synaptic transmission (2, 4–6). CaV2 channels bind the ubiquitous Ca2+ sensor protein calmodulin (CaM)2 to a site in their C-terminal domain, which induces Ca2+-dependent facilitation and inactivation of CaV2.1 channel activity in response to repetitive stimuli (7–10). Facilitation and inactivation of CaV2 channel activity can cause facilitation and depression of synaptic transmission (11, 12). In this minireview, we focus on regulation of the presynaptic CaV2 channels by different calcium sensor proteins and the role of this mechanism in short-term synaptic plasticity.

Presynaptic Calcium Channel

The Ca2+ channels in the CaV1 and CaV2 subfamilies are composed of an α1 subunit and auxiliary subunits β, α2δ, and sometimes γ (Fig. 1) (4, 13). The α1 subunit of 190–250 kDa includes the pore, voltage sensors, gating apparatus, and most sites of channel regulation. The auxiliary subunits have an important influence on Ca2+ channel function (4, 13). The intracellular β subunit is a hydrophilic protein of 50–65 kDa (4, 13). Its structure is composed of an SH3 (Src homology-3) domain and a guanylate kinase domain, both well known protein interaction motifs (14, 15). The guanylate kinase domain binds to an α-helical segment in the intracellular loop connecting domains I and II (Fig. 1), leaving the SH3 domain available for interaction with other binding partners. The transmembrane disulfide-linked α2δ subunit complex is encoded by a single gene, but the resulting prepolypeptide is post-translationally cleaved, disulfide-bonded, and lipid-anchored to yield the mature α2 and δ subunits (4, 13, 16, 17). A γ subunit having four transmembrane segments is a component of skeletal muscle Ca2+ channels (4, 13) but may not be a component of Ca2+ channels in brain, where related γ-like proteins serve as transmembrane AMPA receptor modulators (18). CaVβ subunits greatly enhance cell-surface expression of α1 subunits and shift their kinetics and voltage dependence (4, 13). The α2δ subunits enhance cell-surface expression of α1 subunits (16) and are important for efficiently coupling entry of Ca2+ to exocytosis at active zones in nerve terminals (19).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Subunit structure of Ca2+ channels. Predicted α-helices are depicted as cylinders. The lengths of lines correspond to the lengths of the polypeptide segments represented. The three-dimensional structure of the β subunit is illustrated, as in Ref. 15. The zigzag line on the δ subunit illustrates its glycophosphatidylinositol anchor.

Presynaptic Ca2+ Current and Neurotransmission

Ca2+ influx through CaV2 channels is the predominant source of Ca2+ for initiation of exocytosis of neurotransmitters (2, 3). CaV2.1 channels play a major role in neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction and most synapses in the central nervous system (2). In contrast, CaV2.2 channels are predominant at synapses in the autonomic nervous system (3) and some synapses in the central nervous system (20, 21). CaV2.3 channels also contribute to neurotransmitter release at central nervous system synapses (22).

Ca2+ entry through a single Ca2+ channel can trigger neurotransmitter release with low efficiency (23), but presynaptic active zones are thought to contain several Ca2+ channels that cooperate in triggering exocytosis (24, 25). The release probability of a single synaptic vesicle increases with the number of Ca2+ channels at the active zone (24–26). Vesicle fusion and exocytosis depend on the SNARE proteins synaptobrevin, syntaxin, and SNAP-25 and on Munc18 (27–29). A primed SNARE complex requires the Ca2+-binding protein synaptotagmin, which provides rapid Ca2+-dependent regulation of exocytosis. Five presynaptic proteins (RIM, Munc13, RIM-binding protein, liprin-α, and ELKS) interact with the SNARE complex, dock and prime synaptic vesicles, and recruit docked and primed vesicles to Ca2+ channels (26). Binding of SNARE proteins to the synaptic protein interaction (termed synprint) site (Fig. 2A) regulates expression, localization, and function of CaV2 channels (12, 30–34). The SNARE-interacting protein RIM interacts with the distal C terminus of CaV2.1 channels and with their β subunits, and these interactions are required for recruiting CaV2 channels to active zones (35–37).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Site and mechanism of Ca2+ channel regulation. A, presynaptic Ca2+ channel signaling complex. Sites of interaction of SNARE proteins (the synprint site) and CaM and CaS proteins on the α1 subunit are illustrated. B, model for sequential Ca2+/CaM-dependent facilitation and inactivation. Local rises in intracellular Ca2+ activate the two C-terminal Ca2+-binding EF-hands of CaM, strengthening interaction with the IQ-like motif and causing facilitation. Following prolonged Ca2+ entry, global rises in intracellular Ca2+ allow CaM to become fully liganded and to interact with both the IQ-like motif and CBD to produce inactivation. This figure was reproduced from Ref. 12 with permission.

Neurotransmitter release is proportional to the third or fourth power of Ca2+ entry (38, 39) and occurs in three modes: synchronous (phasic), asynchronous (tonic), and low-probability spontaneous (miniature) release (40–44). Synchronous release driven by precisely timed presynaptic Ca2+ current results in fast postsynaptic responses (45, 46). Slower asynchronous release results from residual Ca2+ remaining in the terminal after an action potential (44, 47, 48). Spontaneous release results from fluctuations in resting Ca2+ concentrations or from Ca2+ release from internal stores (49). Synchronous release is triggered by the Ca2+ sensor synaptotagmin (29, 50–52), whereas the Ca2+ sensor Doc2 plays an important role in asynchronous release (53). CaV2 channels may serve as a Ca2+ source for asynchronous release by conducting an asynchronously activated Ca2+ current that contributes to residual Ca2+ (54).

Short-term Synaptic Plasticity

Neurons fire at frequencies of <1 Hz to several hundred Hz. Changes in firing rate induce different forms of synaptic plasticity. Short-term synaptic plasticity represents an increase (facilitation) or decrease (depression) in synaptic strength, which lasts from hundreds of milliseconds to seconds and is crucial for information processing (55–57). Short-term synaptic plasticity is Ca2+-dependent and predominantly presynaptic, although postsynaptic mechanisms may also contribute (55, 56, 58, 59).

Regulation of Presynaptic Ca2+ Channels by Ca2+ and CaM

P/Q-type Ca2+ currents recorded in the large calyx of Held synapse in the brain stem or in transfected non-neuronal cells expressing CaV2.1 channels facilitate in response to pairs or short trains of depolarizations (7, 8, 60, 61) and inactivate in response to prolonged trains (8, 62, 63). Both facilitation and inactivation are Ca2+-dependent, and the facilitation process has higher affinity and/or more rapid binding of Ca2+ than the inactivation process, as judged by sensitivity to intracellular chelators (8).

Both Ca2+-dependent facilitation and inactivation of CaV2.1 channels are dependent on interaction with CaM (8), which binds to a modified IQ-like domain (IM motif) and a downstream CaM-binding domain (CBD) (Fig. 2A) (7, 9, 10). Ca2+-dependent facilitation is reduced by mutations in C-terminal EF-hands of CaM and by complementary mutations in the IM motif of CaV2.1 channels (7, 9, 10). In contrast, Ca2+-dependent inactivation is inhibited by mutations in the N-terminal lobe of CaM and by deletion of the CBD of CaV2.1 channels (7, 9, 10). Based on these results, a model has been proposed in which local Ca2+ causes facilitation through interaction of the C-terminal lobe of CaM with the IM motif, whereas global Ca2+ causes inactivation of CaV2.1 channels by binding of the N-terminal lobe of CaM to the CBD (Fig. 2B).

CaM can bind to CaV2 channels without or with Ca2+ bound (64). Multiphoton microscopy and rapid microfluidic mixing revealed conformational changes in the CaM C-terminal lobe with a time constant of ∼0.5 ms and in the CaM N-terminal lobe with a time constant of ∼20 ms (65). These rate constants are faster than facilitation and inactivation of CaV2.1 channels, but lobe-specific conformational transitions in CaM would be slowed by binding to a regulatory target that requires additional conformational changes as part of its regulatory mechanism. Thus, Ca2+ binding to CaM prebound to CaV2.1 channels may induce two sequential conformational changes, which in turn induce facilitation and inactivation (Fig. 2B).

Crystal structures of CaM bound to short peptides containing the IQ motif show that both lobes of Ca2+/CaM bind this sequence (66, 67). Complexes of CaM with IQ motif-containing peptides from CaV2.1, CaV2.2, and CaV2.3 channels all have similar structures, even though CaV2.1 channels show much stronger facilitation (68). Available crystal structures of CaM with the IQ motif bound contain only short peptides from CaV2.1 (66–68), which may not retain their native structures. Crystal structures of the C-terminal domain of CaV2 channels containing the IM motif and CBD binding sites in their native structural context with bound CaM would be very informative in determining the structural basis for CaV2 facilitation and inactivation.

Ca2+ Channel Regulation and Short-term Facilitation

Much evidence indicates that short-term facilitation is caused by residual Ca2+ that builds up from action potentials (55, 56). However, the molecular mechanism by which residual Ca2+ induces synaptic plasticity remains unknown. Two major effector mechanisms have been proposed for facilitation. In one, facilitation is proposed to result from saturation of local Ca2+ buffers, such as calbindin-D28k and parvalbumin (69–71). These Ca2+ buffers are partially saturated by residual Ca2+, resulting in an additional Ca2+ increase during subsequent action potentials (69–71). The second mechanism suggests residual Ca2+ binds to a Ca2+ sensor other than that for exocytosis and activates it to increase the probability of release. Unlike Ca2+ buffers, Ca2+ sensor proteins bind Ca2+ and undergo a conformational change to regulate targets (72). Activation of a Ca2+ sensor protein could increase Ca2+ entry and thereby enhance neurotransmitter release according to the power law (12) or could directly modulate exocytosis (73, 74). Increased Ca2+ entry could result from Ca2+-dependent increase in Ca2+ channel activity by facilitation, which occurs on the millisecond time scale. Alternatively, Ca2+ channel density at the active zone could be increased, which increases synaptic strength (19, 24, 25), but there is no evidence to date that Ca2+ channels can be inserted into active zones on the millisecond time scale.

At the calyx of Held, activity-dependent increase in P/Q-type Ca2+ current correlates with synaptic facilitation according to the power law (75, 76). In CaV2.1 α1 subunit-deficient knock-out mice, activity-dependent facilitation of presynaptic Ca2+ current and synaptic facilitation are lost (75–77), and the remaining synaptic transmission driven by presynaptic N-type Ca2+ currents does not cause facilitation of Ca2+ current or synaptic strength (77). These data suggest that Ca2+ entry through CaV2.1 channels is necessary for synaptic facilitation at the calyx of Held; however, quantitative comparisons indicate that facilitation via Ca2+ channels accounts for no more than half of the synaptic facilitation at the mature synapse (78).

Analysis of presynaptic Ca2+ channel regulation in synaptic transmission using molecular methods is challenging because of the need to alter regulation only in the presynaptic cell. Superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons provide a unique expression system. They lack CaV2.1 channels, which are expressed primarily in central neurons, and their large cell bodies allow microinjection of cDNA encoding CaV2.1 channels, which triggers synaptic transmission at 30–40% of the level of endogenous CaV2.2 channels (79). The contribution of CaV2.1 channels to synaptic transmission can be isolated by blocking endogenous CaV2.2 channels with ω-conotoxin GVIA. As in the calyx of Held, synaptic transmission mediated by P/Q-type Ca2+ currents through transfected CaV2.1 channels in SCG neurons undergoes short-term facilitation and depression (11). Mutation of the IM motif prevents synaptic facilitation by paired pulses or trains (11). These results show that facilitation of the activity of CaV2.1 channels by binding of CaM to these motifs is the primary mechanism of synaptic facilitation in transfected SCG neurons expressing CaV2.1 channels.

Ca2+ Channel Regulation and Short-term Depression

Synaptic depression reduces the strength of synaptic transmission during paired pulses (paired-pulse depression) or longer trains of stimuli. Depression results primarily from depletion of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles that can be released with high probability in response to Ca2+ signals (56, 80). After prolonged stimulation, depletion of the readily releasable pool can result from physical depletion of the total pool of synaptic vesicles observed in electron microscopy at neuromuscular and ganglionic synapses (81, 82). However, studies using short trains of stimuli suggest that short-term synaptic depression is independent of vesicle depletion (63, 83). At the calyx of Held, even after complete depletion of the readily releasable pool of vesicles by repetitive stimulation, substantial neurotransmitter release can be elicited by light-induced uncaging of Ca2+ simultaneously throughout the nerve terminal (Fig. 3A) (84). Remarkably, the remaining synaptic vesicles respond as rapidly as those recruited by action potentials and have similar sensitivity to Ca2+ (Fig. 3B) (84). Thus, depletion of the readily releasable pool by repeated action potentials reflects selective depletion of docked vesicles near functionally active Ca2+ channels, leaving other distant docked vesicles ready to be released with normal sensitivity by the uncaging of Ca2+ near them. These results indicate that the pool of vesicles released in response to action potentials is docked near active Ca2+ channels. Vesicles docked far from Ca2+ channels or near inactivated Ca2+ channels cannot participate in the readily releasable pool accessed by action potential-triggered neurotransmission.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Two classes of readily releasable synaptic vesicles. A, at the calyx of Held, the presynaptic terminal was stimulated to generate a series of presynaptic Ca2+ currents (Ipre; upper trace), which elicited a series of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC; middle trace). Calculation of the total neurotransmitter release showed a rise and fall in the release rate during the train (lower trace). Following the train, a single light flash was given (arrow), and the resulting excitatory postsynaptic current and release were recorded. Integration of the excitatory postsynaptic currents showed that 66% of the total pool of synaptic vesicles was released during the train of action potentials, and 34% was released by uncaging of Ca2+. The rate and Ca2+ sensitivity of the synaptic vesicles released by the light flash were the same as those released by action potentials. This figure was reproduced from Ref. 84 with permission. B, drawing illustrating four docked synaptic vesicles, two tethered near CaV2.1 channels and two docked farther away. Left, Ca2+ entry through CaV2.1 channels induces exocytosis from the two synaptic vesicles docked near the channels but not from the two docked farther away. Right, a general increase in Ca2+ from photo-uncaging causes neurotransmitter release from all four docked synaptic vesicles.

Decreased release probability caused by decreased Ca2+ entry due to changes in action potential waveform (85) or feedback inhibition by metabotropic autoreceptors (86, 87) has been proposed to contribute to short-term synaptic depression. Moreover, physiological studies of the calyx of Held showed that Ca2+-dependent inactivation of the presynaptic P/Q-type current correlates with the rapid phase of synaptic depression (62, 63, 88). Because inactivation of Ca2+ channels would transiently remove synaptic vesicles docked nearby from the functional readily releasable pool, inactivation of Ca2+ channels would contribute to synaptic depression that is measured as a reduction in the readily releasable pool of vesicles in response to action potentials. CaM inhibitors partially relieve inactivation of the presynaptic Ca2+ current and reduce synaptic depression (63), suggesting that synaptic depression is Ca2+/CaM-dependent.

An essential role for regulation of Ca2+/CaM-dependent inactivation of CaV2.1 channels in short-term synaptic depression was demonstrated in transfected SCG neuron synapses (11). Deletion of the CBD in the C terminus of transfected CaV2.1 channels, which blocks inactivation of P/Q-type Ca2+ currents (7, 10), reduced paired-pulse depression and rapid synaptic depression during trains (11). These data show directly that CaM binding to the CBD induces inactivation of presynaptic CaV2.1 channels, which in turn causes rapid synaptic depression evoked by physiological activity patterns. A slower phase of synaptic depression in SCG synapses expressing mutant CaV2.1 channels may be caused by physical depletion of the synaptic vesicle pool.

CaV2 channel function is greatly influenced by auxiliary CaVβ subunits, and CaVβ4a and CaVβ2a have marked effects on synaptic plasticity (89). Expression of CaVβ2a in cultured neurons favors synaptic depression, whereas expression of CaVβ4a favors facilitation (89). Expression of the 14-3-3 protein also modulates the rate of synaptic depression in cultured neurons by changing the rate of inactivation of CaV2.2 channels, further supporting a role of inactivation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels in rapid synaptic depression (90). Thus, Ca2+-dependent inactivation of CaV2 channels is a negative feedback process that prevents excessive Ca2+ entry and also mediates a rapid phase of depression of synaptic transmission.

Regulation of CaV2 Channels by Neuronal Ca2+ Sensor Proteins

CaM belongs to a superfamily of CaS (Ca2+ sensor) proteins, and some CaS proteins are highly expressed in neurons (72, 91). Like CaM, CaS proteins have four EF-hand Ca2+-binding motifs organized in two lobes connected by a central α-helix. However, in contrast to CaM, at least one of the two N-terminal EF-hands of CaS proteins does not bind Ca2+ due to changes in amino acid sequence, and CaS proteins share a consensus sequence for N-terminal myristoylation (72).

CaBP1 (Ca2+-binding protein-1) is similar to CaM in amino acid sequence but is differentially expressed in neurons (92). It is co-localized with presynaptic CaV2.1 channels and binds to the CBD of the CaV2.1 α1 subunit (93). However, binding of CaBP1 causes rapid CaV2.1 inactivation in a Ca2+-independent manner, and it does not support CaV2.1 facilitation (Fig. 4A) (93). Thus, the changes in amino acid sequence of CaBP1 have profound effects on its regulatory properties. VILIP-2 (visinin-like protein-2), which is highly expressed in the neocortex and hippocampus (72), has complementary regulatory effects to CaBP1: it increases CaV2.1 facilitation but inhibits CaV2.1 inactivation (Fig. 4A) (94). Thus, CaBP1 and VILIP-2 bind to the same site as CaM but have opposite effects on CaV2.1 channel activity.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Regulation of Ca2+ channels and synaptic plasticity by Ca2+ sensor proteins. A, regulation of CaV2.1 channel activity. Ca2+ currents were recorded during a train of 5-ms depolarizations from −80 to +10 mV at 100 Hz in transfected non-neuronal cells expressing CaV2.1 channels. Ca2+ currents in the presence of endogenous CaM (black) show initial Ca2+-dependent facilitation, followed by Ca2+-dependent and voltage-dependent inactivation. In contrast, CaV2.1 channel currents modulated by exogenously expressed CaBP1 (blue) or VILIP-2 (green) show different patterns of regulation: facilitation without inactivation for VILIP-2 and inactivation without facilitation for CaBP1. B, synaptic transmission in SCG neurons transfected with wild-type (left panel) or mutant (IM-AA/ΔCBD; right panel) CaV2.1 channels alone (black) or with CaBP1 (blue). C, synaptic transmission in SCG neurons transfected with wild-type (left panel) or mutant (right panel) CaV2.1 channels alone (black) or with VILIP-2 (green). Cultured SCG neurons were injected in their nuclei with cDNAs encoding CaV2.1, CaBP1, and VILIP-2. After 2–3 days, the injected cell was impaled with a sharp microelectrode and served as the presynaptic cell. Neighboring cells were similarly impaled, and synaptic transmission from the transfected presynaptic cell to a non-transfected postsynaptic neighbor was elicited by a train of stimuli at 30 Hz for 1 s. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) were recorded and normalized to the initial excitatory postsynaptic potential in the train.

Analysis of chimeras in which intact domains from neuronal CaS proteins were transferred to CaM has begun to unravel the molecular code used by CaS proteins to induce their different effects on CaV2.1 channels. Myristoylation of the N termini of CaBP1 and VILIP-2 is required for their distinctive regulatory effects (95), implicating the unique N-terminal domains of CaS proteins in differential modulation. However, transfer of the N-terminal domains of CaBP1 and VILIP-2 to CaM is necessary, but not sufficient, to induce their distinct regulatory properties (95, 96). The second EF-hand motif of CaBP1, which is inactive in Ca2+ binding, is also required to enhance inactivation of CaV2.1 channels (96). These results imply that EF-hand 2 is in an active conformation with respect to channel regulation, even though it does not bind Ca2+. Unlike CaBP1, transfer of the central α-helix, EF-hands 3 and 4, and the N-terminal domain of VILIP-2 is required for its regulation of CaV2.1 channels (97). Thus, VILIP-2 uses a complex set of interactions of three of its domains with the IM and CBD motifs in regulation of CaV2.1 channels. These results point to the importance of conformationally intact domains of CaS proteins and their target sites on CaV2.1 channels in mediating channel regulation. Defining the structural domains of CaV2.1 channels that interact with these crucial domains of CaS proteins will give much needed insight into the structural basis for their selective modulation of CaV2.1 channels.

Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity by Ca2+ Sensor Proteins Acting on Ca2+ Channels

Different synapses show diverse patterns of facilitation and depression, and the underlying mechanism for this diversity is unknown (56, 57). The differential regulatory effects of CaM, CaBP1, and VILIP-2 on CaV2.1 channel activity are potentially important determinants of this diversity of short-term synaptic plasticity, which would substantially change the encoding properties of the synapse in response to trains of action potentials (57). Residual Ca2+ in active zones can act on CaS proteins to enhance synaptic facilitation. For example, NCS-1 (neuronal Ca2+ sensor-1) increases presynaptic facilitation at the calyx of Held by accelerating activation of P/Q-type Ca2+ currents (98). Similarly, in cultured hippocampal neurons, expression of NCS-1 enhances synaptic transmission (74). These results suggest that residual Ca2+ facilitates the activity of CaV2.1 channels via NCS-1. However, no evidence has emerged indicating that NCS-1 acts directly by binding to CaV2.1 channels.

The ability of CaBP1 and VILIP-2 to fine-tune short-term synaptic plasticity by regulation of CaV2.1 channels has been shown directly by expression of wild-type and mutant CaV2.1 channels with CaS proteins in SCG neurons (99). Expression of CaV2.1 channels with CaBP1, which enhances inactivation of CaV2.1 currents, causes loss of synaptic facilitation and enhanced synaptic depression in SCG neurons (Fig. 4B) (93, 99). Expression of CaV2.1 with VILIP-2, which enhances facilitation of CaV2.1 currents (94), causes reduced synaptic depression and enhanced synaptic facilitation (Fig. 4C) (99). These functional effects are lost when the IM motif and CBD are mutated (Fig. 4, B and C) (99). These results show that CaBP1 and VILIP-2 act directly on CaV2.1 channels by binding to their C-terminal regulatory site and cause push-pull regulation of the form of short-term synaptic plasticity, with CaBP1 favoring depression and VILIP-2 favoring facilitation. It is likely that fine-tuning of synaptic facilitation and depression by CaS proteins plays an important role in determining the diversity of short-term synaptic plasticity at CNS synapses.

Conclusion

Classical physiological studies of neuromuscular transmission revealed short-term synaptic facilitation and depression and demonstrated that residual Ca2+ resulting from action potentials was involved in synaptic facilitation. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie short-term synaptic facilitation and depression have remained uncertain until recently. As reviewed here, increasing evidence now supports regulation of presynaptic CaV2.1 channels by direct binding of CaM and CaS proteins as a major contributor to short-term synaptic plasticity in two different experimental preparations: the calyx of Held and the transfected SCG neuron. No doubt, other molecular mechanisms also contribute to this important Ca2+ signaling process. However, at this stage, regulation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels by binding of CaM and CaS proteins is the only molecular mechanism that has been demonstrated to be capable of generating and regulating short-term synaptic plasticity in situ in synapses. Further analysis of this crucial regulatory mechanism should reveal its molecular and structural basis and its role in neuronal circuits important for learning, memory, and behavior.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 NS22625. This article is part of the Thematic Minireview Series on Calcium Function and Disease.

2
The abbreviations used are:
CaM
calmodulin
CBD
CaM-binding domain
SCG
superior cervical ganglion.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ertel E. A., Campbell K. P., Harpold M. M., Hofmann F., Mori Y., Perez-Reyes E., Schwartz A., Snutch T. P., Tanabe T., Birnbaumer L., Tsien R. W., Catterall W. A. (2000) Nomenclature of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron 25, 533–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dunlap K., Luebke J. I., Turner T. J. (1995) Exocytotic Ca2+ channels in mammalian central neurons. Trends Neurosci. 18, 89–98 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Olivera B. M., Miljanich G. P., Ramachandran J., Adams M. E. (1994) Calcium channel diversity and neurotransmitter release: the ω-conotoxins and ω-agatoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 823–867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Catterall W. A. (2000) Structure and regulation of voltage-gated calcium channels. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 16, 521–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tedford H. W., Zamponi G. W. (2006) Direct G protein modulation of CaV2 calcium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 837–862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lipscombe D., Raingo J. (2007) Alternative splicing matters: N-type calcium channels in nociceptors. Channels 1, 225–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lee A., Wong S. T., Gallagher D., Li B., Storm D. R., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (1999) Calcium/calmodulin binds to and modulates P/Q-type calcium channels. Nature 399, 155–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lee A., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2000) Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent facilitation and inactivation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. J. Neurosci. 20, 6830–6838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. DeMaria C. D., Soong T. W., Alseikhan B. A., Alvania R. S., Yue D. T. (2001) Calmodulin bifurcates the local calcium signal that modulates P/Q-type calcium channels. Nature 411, 484–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lee A., Zhou H., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2003) Molecular determinants of calcium/calmodulin-dependent regulation of CaV2.1 channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 16059–16064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mochida S., Few A. P., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2008) Regulation of presynaptic CaV2.1 channels by Ca2+ sensor proteins mediates short-term synaptic plasticity. Neuron 57, 210–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Catterall W. A., Few A. P. (2008) Calcium channel regulation and presynaptic plasticity. Neuron 59, 882–901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hofmann F., Lacinová L., Klugbauer N. (1999) Voltage-dependent calcium channels: from structure to function. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 139, 33–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chen Y. H., Li M. H., Zhang Y., He L. L., Yamada Y., Fitzmaurice A., Shen Y., Zhang H., Tong L., Yang J. (2004) Structural basis of the α1-β subunit interaction of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Nature 429, 675–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Van Petegem F., Clark K. A., Chatelain F. C., Minor D. L., Jr. (2004) Structure of a complex between a voltage-gated calcium channel β-subunit and an α-subunit domain. Nature 429, 671–675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Davies A., Hendrich J., Van Minh A. T., Wratten J., Douglas L., Dolphin A. C. (2007) Functional biology of the α2δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 28, 220–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Davies A., Kadurin I., Alvarez-Laviada A., Douglas L., Nieto-Rostro M., Bauer C. S., Pratt W. S., Dolphin A. C. (2010) The α2δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels form GPI-anchored proteins, a posttranslational modification essential for function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1654–1659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Milstein A. D., Nicoll R. A. (2008) Regulation of AMPA receptor gating and pharmacology by TARP auxiliary subunits. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 333–339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hoppa M. B., Lana B., Margas W., Dolphin A. C., Ryan T. A. (2012) α2δ expression sets presynaptic calcium channel abundance and release probability. Nature 486, 122–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Poncer J. C., McKinney R. A., Gähwiler B. H., Thompson S. M. (1997) Either N- or P-type calcium channels mediate GABA release at distinct hippocampal inhibitory synapses. Neuron 18, 463–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ali A. B., Nelson C. (2006) Distinct Ca2+ channels mediate transmitter release at excitatory synapses displaying different dynamic properties in rat neocortex. Cereb. Cortex 16, 386–393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gasparini S., Kasyanov A. M., Pietrobon D., Voronin L. L., Cherubini E. (2001) Presynaptic R-type calcium channels contribute to fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 21, 8715–8721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Stanley E. F. (1993) Single calcium channels and acetylcholine release at a presynaptic nerve terminal. Neuron 11, 1007–1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Holderith N., Lorincz A., Katona G., Rózsa B., Kulik A., Watanabe M., Nusser Z. (2012) Release probability of hippocampal glutamatergic terminals scales with the size of the active zone. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 988–997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sheng J., He L., Zheng H., Xue L., Luo F., Shin W., Sun T., Kuner T., Yue D. T., Wu L. G. (2012) Calcium-channel number critically influences synaptic strength and plasticity at the active zone. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 998–1006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Südhof T. C. (2012) The presynaptic active zone. Neuron 75, 11–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Söllner T., Whiteheart S. W., Brunner M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Geromanos S., Tempst P., Rothman J. E. (1993) SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion. Nature 362, 318–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bajjalieh S. M., Scheller R. H. (1995) The biochemistry of neurotransmitter secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1971–1974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Südhof T. C. (2004) The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 509–547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sheng Z. H., Rettig J., Takahashi M., Catterall W. A. (1994) Identification of a syntaxin-binding site on N-type calcium channels. Neuron 13, 1303–1313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sheng Z. H., Rettig J., Cook T., Catterall W. A. (1996) Calcium-dependent interaction of N-type calcium channels with the synaptic core complex. Nature 379, 451–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mochida S., Sheng Z. H., Baker C., Kobayashi H., Catterall W. A. (1996) Inhibition of neurotransmission by peptides containing the synaptic protein interaction site of N-type Ca2+ channels. Neuron 17, 781–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Rettig J., Sheng Z. H., Kim D. K., Hodson C. D., Snutch T. P., Catterall W. A. (1996) Isoform-specific interaction of the α1A subunits of brain Ca2+ channels with the presynaptic proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 7363–7368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Rettig J., Heinemann C., Ashery U., Sheng Z. H., Yokoyama C. T., Catterall W. A., Neher E. (1997) Alteration of Ca2+ dependence of neurotransmitter release by disruption of Ca2+ channel/syntaxin interaction. J. Neurosci. 17, 6647–6656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kiyonaka S., Wakamori M., Miki T., Uriu Y., Nonaka M., Bito H., Beedle A. M., Mori E., Hara Y., De Waard M., Kanagawa M., Itakura M., Takahashi M., Campbell K. P., Mori Y. (2007) RIM1 confers sustained activity and neurotransmitter vesicle anchoring to presynaptic Ca2+ channels. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 691–701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Han Y., Kaeser P. S., Südhof T. C., Schneggenburger R. (2011) RIM determines Ca2+ channel density and vesicle docking at the presynaptic active zone. Neuron 69, 304–316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kaeser P. S., Deng L., Wang Y., Dulubova I., Liu X., Rizo J., Südhof T. C. (2011) RIM proteins tether Ca2+ channels to presynaptic active zones via a direct PDZ-domain interaction. Cell 144, 282–295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dodge F. A., Jr., Rahamimoff R. (1967) Cooperative action of calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 193, 419–432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Katz B., Miledi R. (1970) Further study of the role of calcium in synaptic transmission. J. Physiol. 207, 789–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hubbard J. I. (1963) Repetitive stimulation at the mammalian neuromuscular junction, and the mobilization of transmitter. J. Physiol. 169, 641–662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Barrett E. F., Stevens C. F. (1972) The kinetics of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 227, 691–708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rahamimoff R., Yaari Y. (1973) Delayed release of transmitter at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 228, 241–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Goda Y., Stevens C. F. (1994) Two components of transmitter release at a central synapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 12942–12946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Atluri P. P., Regehr W. G. (1998) Delayed release of neurotransmitter from cerebellar granule cells. J. Neurosci. 18, 8214–8227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Llinás R., Steinberg I. Z., Walton K. (1981) Relationship between presynaptic calcium current and postsynaptic potential in squid giant synapse. Biophys. J. 33, 323–351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sabatini B. L., Regehr W. G. (1996) Timing of neurotransmission at fast synapses in the mammalian brain. Nature 384, 170–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lu T., Trussell L. O. (2000) Inhibitory transmission mediated by asynchronous transmitter release. Neuron 26, 683–694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hagler D. J., Jr., Goda Y. (2001) Properties of synchronous and asynchronous release during pulse train depression in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 2324–2334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Llano I., González J., Caputo C., Lai F. A., Blayney L. M., Tan Y. P., Marty A. (2000) Presynaptic calcium stores underlie large-amplitude miniature IPSCs and spontaneous calcium transients. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1256–1265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. DiAntonio A., Schwarz T. L. (1994) The effect on synaptic physiology of synaptotagmin mutations in Drosophila. Neuron 12, 909–920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Geppert M., Goda Y., Hammer R. E., Li C., Rosahl T. W., Stevens C. F., Südhof T. C. (1994) Synaptotagmin I: a major Ca2+ sensor for transmitter release at a central synapse. Cell 79, 717–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Koh T. W., Bellen H. J. (2003) Synaptotagmin I, a Ca2+ sensor for neurotransmitter release. Trends Neurosci. 26, 413–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yao J., Gaffaney J. D., Kwon S. E., Chapman E. R. (2011) Doc2 is a Ca2+ sensor required for asynchronous neurotransmitter release. Cell 147, 666–677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Few A. P., Nanou E., Watari H., Sullivan J. M., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2012) Asynchronous Ca2+ current conducted by voltage-gated Ca2+ CaV2.1 and CaV2.2 channels and its implications for asynchronous neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E452–E460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Katz B., Miledi R. (1968) The role of calcium in neuromuscular facilitation. J. Physiol. 195, 481–492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zucker R. S., Regehr W. G. (2002) Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 355–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Abbott L. F., Regehr W. G. (2004) Synaptic computation. Nature 431, 796–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Del Castillo J., Katz B. (1954) Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J. Physiol. 124, 574–585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Fisher S. A., Fischer T. M., Carew T. J. (1997) Multiple overlapping processes underlying short-term synaptic enhancement. Trends Neurosci. 20, 170–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Borst J. G., Sakmann B. (1998) Facilitation of presynaptic calcium currents in the rat brainstem. J. Physiol. 513, 149–155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Cuttle M. F., Tsujimoto T., Forsythe I. D., Takahashi T. (1998) Facilitation of the presynaptic calcium current at an auditory synapse in rat brainstem. J. Physiol. 512, 723–729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Forsythe I. D., Tsujimoto T., Barnes-Davies M., Cuttle M. F., Takahashi T. (1998) Inactivation of presynaptic calcium current contributes to synaptic depression at a fast central synapse. Neuron 20, 797–807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Xu J., Wu L. G. (2005) The decrease in the presynaptic calcium current is a major cause of short-term depression at a calyx-type synapse. Neuron 46, 633–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Halling D. B., Aracena-Parks P., Hamilton S. L. (2005) Regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by calmodulin. Sci. STKE 2005, re15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Park H. Y., Kim S. A., Korlach J., Rhoades E., Kwok L. W., Zipfel W. R., Waxham M. N., Webb W. W., Pollack L. (2008) Conformational changes of calmodulin upon Ca2+ binding studied with a microfluidic mixer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 542–547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Fallon J. L., Halling D. B., Hamilton S. L., Quiocho F. A. (2005) Structure of calmodulin bound to the hydrophobic IQ domain of the cardiac CaV1.2 calcium channel. Structure 13, 1881–1886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Van Petegem F., Chatelain F. C., Minor D. L., Jr. (2005) Insights into voltage-gated calcium channel regulation from the structure of the CaV1.2 IQ domain-Ca2+/calmodulin complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1108–1115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kim E. Y., Rumpf C. H., Fujiwara Y., Cooley E. S., Van Petegem F., Minor D. L. (2008) Structures of CaV2 Ca2+/CaM-IQ domain complexes reveal binding modes that underlie calcium-dependent inactivation and facilitation. Structure 16, 1455–1467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Felmy F., Neher E., Schneggenburger R. (2003) Probing the intracellular calcium sensitivity of transmitter release during synaptic facilitation. Neuron 37, 801–811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Blatow M., Caputi A., Burnashev N., Monyer H., Rozov A. (2003) Calcium buffer saturation underlies paired pulse facilitation in calbindin-D28k-containing terminals. Neuron 38, 79–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Müller M., Felmy F., Schwaller B., Schneggenburger R. (2007) Parvalbumin is a mobile presynaptic Ca2+ buffer in the calyx of Held that accelerates the decay of Ca2+ and short-term facilitation. J. Neurosci. 27, 2261–2271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Burgoyne R. D., Weiss J. L. (2001) The neuronal calcium sensor family of calcium-binding proteins. Biochem. J. 353, 1–12 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Dittman J. S., Kreitzer A. C., Regehr W. G. (2000) Interplay between facilitation, depression, and residual calcium at three presynaptic terminals. J. Neurosci. 20, 1374–1385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Sippy T., Cruz-Martín A., Jeromin A., Schweizer F. E. (2003) Acute changes in short-term plasticity at synapses with elevated levels of neuronal calcium sensor-1. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1031–1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Inchauspe C. C. G., Martini F. J., Forsythe I. D., Uchitel O. D. (2004) Functional compensation of P/Q by N-type channels blocks short-term plasticity at the calyx of Held presynaptic terminal. J. Neurosci. 24, 10379–10383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Ishikawa T., Kaneko M., Shin H. S., Takahashi T. (2005) Presynaptic N-type and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels mediating synaptic transmission at the calyx of Held of mice. J. Physiol. 568, 199–209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Inchauspe C. G., Forsythe I. D., Uchitel O. D. (2007) Changes in synaptic transmission properties due to the expression of N-type calcium channels at the calyx of Held synapse of mice lacking P/Q-type calcium channels. J. Physiol. 584, 835–851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Müller M., Felmy F., Schneggenburger R. (2008) A limited contribution of Ca2+ current facilitation to paired-pulse facilitation of transmitter release at the rat calyx of Held. J. Physiol. 586, 5503–5520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Mochida S., Westenbroek R. E., Yokoyama C. T., Itoh K., Catterall W. A. (2003) Subtype-selective reconstitution of synaptic transmission in sympathetic ganglion neurons by expression of exogenous calcium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2813–2818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Schneggenburger R., Sakaba T., Neher E. (2002) Vesicle pools and short-term synaptic depression: lessons from a large synapse. Trends Neurosci. 25, 206–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Dickinson-Nelson A., Reese T. S. (1983) Structural changes during transmitter release at synapses in the frog sympathetic ganglion. J. Neurosci. 3, 42–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S. (1981) Structural changes after transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Cell Biol. 88, 564–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Sullivan J. M. (2007) A simple depletion model of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles cannot account for paired-pulse depression. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 948–950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Wadel K., Neher E., Sakaba T. (2007) The coupling between synaptic vesicles and Ca2+ channels determines fast neurotransmitter release. Neuron 53, 563–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Borst J. G., Sakmann B. (1999) Effect of changes in action potential shape on calcium currents and transmitter release in a calyx-type synapse of the rat auditory brainstem. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 354, 347–355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. von Gersdorff H., Schneggenburger R., Weis S., Neher E. (1997) Presynaptic depression at a calyx synapse: the small contribution of metabotropic glutamate receptors. J. Neurosci. 17, 8137–8146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Iwasaki S., Takahashi T. (2001) Developmental regulation of transmitter release at the calyx of Held in rat auditory brainstem. J. Physiol. 534, 861–871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Wu L. G., Borst J. G. (1999) The reduced release probability of releasable vesicles during recovery from short-term synaptic depression. Neuron 23, 821–832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Xie M., Li X., Han J., Vogt D. L., Wittemann S., Mark M. D., Herlitze S. (2007) Facilitation versus depression in cultured hippocampal neurons determined by targeting of Ca2+ channel CaVβ4 versus CaVβ2 subunits to synaptic terminals. J. Cell Biol. 178, 489–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Li Y., Wu Y., Zhou Y. (2006) Modulation of inactivation properties of CaV2.2 channels by 14-3-3 proteins. Neuron 51, 755–771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Haeseleer F., Imanishi Y., Sokal I., Filipek S., Palczewski K. (2002) Calcium-binding proteins: intracellular sensors from the calmodulin superfamily. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 615–623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Haeseleer F., Sokal I., Verlinde C. L., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Pronin A. N., Benovic J. L., Fariss R. N., Palczewski K. (2000) Five members of a novel Ca2+-binding protein (CABP) subfamily with similarity to calmodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1247–1260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Lee A., Westenbroek R. E., Haeseleer F., Palczewski K., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2002) Differential modulation of CaV2.1 channels by calmodulin and calcium-binding protein 1. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 210–217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Lautermilch N. J., Few A. P., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2005) Modulation of CaV2.1 channels by the neuronal calcium-binding protein visinin-like protein-2. J. Neurosci. 25, 7062–7070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Few A. P., Lautermilch N. J., Westenbroek R. E., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2005) Differential regulation of CaV2.1 channels by calcium-binding protein-1 and visinin-like protein-2 requires N-terminal myristoylation. J. Neurosci. 25, 7071–7080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Few A. P., Nanou E., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2011) Molecular determinants of CaV2.1 channel regulation by calcium-binding protein-1. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 41917–41923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Nanou E., Martinez G. Q., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2012) Molecular determinants of modulation of CaV2.1 channels by visinin-like protein 2. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 504–513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Tsujimoto T., Jeromin A., Saitoh N., Roder J. C., Takahashi T. (2002) Neuronal calcium sensor-1 and activity-dependent facilitation of P/Q-type calcium currents at presynaptic nerve terminals. Science 295, 2276–2279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Leal K., Mochida S., Scheuer T., Catterall W. A. (2012) Fine-tuning synaptic plasticity by modulation of CaV2.1 channels with calcium sensor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17069–17074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES