Skip to main content
AACR Open Access logoLink to AACR Open Access
. 2026 Apr 17;25(10):1716–1730. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-26-0077

An Integrin β6–Targeted Antibody–Drug Conjugate Optimized for Intravesical Delivery to Treat Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Christopher M Carosino 1,#,*, Devra J Olson 1,#, Rebecca C Mazahreh 1,#, David J Ortiz 1, Steve Duniho 1, Eliana Moskovitz 1, Marlena Gray 1, Renee F Hein 1, Nicolas H Garcia 1, Hamidreza Ardalani 1, Lauren Farr 1, Tianyang Yan 1, Maddy Burcher 1, Iliyana Mikell 1, Matthew R Levengood 1, Sharsti Sandall 1, Joseph D Dekker 1,#,*
PMCID: PMC13631498  PMID: 42008114

Abstract

Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for 75% of all new bladder cancer diagnoses. Despite new therapeutic treatment options aiming to replace Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), the standard of care for 40+ years, high rates of failure and recurrence of disease remain in patients with NMIBC. Integrins are a large family of cell surface receptors involved in key biological processes such as cellular adhesion, motility, and cytokinesis, and integrin β-6 (IB6) has emerged as a clinically relevant target due to its restricted expression in normal adult epithelial tissues and elevated levels in solid tumors. IB6 is being actively tested in lung cancer with the antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) sigvotatug vedotin. In this study, we introduce PF-08052667, an IB6-directed ADC that has been optimized for local delivery via intravesical dosing in patients with NMIBC. PF-08052667 leverages the high and consistent expression of IB6 in NMIBC tumors for efficient ADC internalization. In PF-08052667, an average of 8 monomethyl auristatin E molecules are attached to an IB6-specific humanized IgG1 antibody via a glucuronide linker shown to increase potency in vitro. PF-08052667 efficacy was further optimized when administered after a bladder prewash, which improved ADC delivery to the bladder tissue. The combination of highly potent PF-08052667 with bladder prewash demonstrated enhanced in vivo efficacy while maintaining minimal systemic exposure and no systemic toxicity. Together, the results position PF-08052667 as a potential first-in-class ADC optimized for intravesical delivery and support further clinical examination in an ongoing phase I trial testing safety and efficacy in BCG-unresponsive and BCG-exposed NMIBC (NCT07206225).

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the most common form of urothelial cancer and comprises 90% of all urothelial cancer cases (1). Globally, 573,000 new cases and 213,000 deaths due to bladder cancer were reported in 2020 (2). Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a type of early bladder cancer that develops on the urothelial surface but has not invaded the deeper muscle tissue (3, 4). Treatment of high-risk NMIBC typically involves transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) or other chemotherapies (3, 5). The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with NMIBC is 98% (stage Ta) and 85% (stage T1) and can vary depending on the stage at diagnosis (6); however, the survival rate may be as low as 28% in patients with high-risk NMIBC, depending on the therapeutic regimen received and treatment compliance (7). About 70% of patients with NMIBC have recurrent disease, and 10% to 20% of patients with NMIBC progress to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC; ref. 8). Although BCG is effective and safe, ongoing shortages and the lack of a durable response rate, in which approximately two thirds of cases either do not respond or relapse, underscore the need for more effective treatment options.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of therapeutics that combine the specificity of an antibody to its antigen with the cytotoxic potency of a therapeutic payload linked to the antibody through an enzyme-cleavable linker. The primary mechanism of action (MOA) of this drug class involves binding to the target antigen on cancer cells, internalization of the antigen–ADC complex, and cleavage of the ADC linker which releases the cytotoxic payload inside the cell. Currently, nearly 20 ADCs have been approved worldwide, all of which are delivered systemically via intravenous injection. In urothelial cancer, systemically administered ADCs, especially monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)–based ADCs, have become standard-of-care therapies. Enfortumab vedotin, an MMAE-containing Nectin-4-directed ADC (drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) 3.8), has redefined the standard of care in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer as a monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab, with recent approvals in the perioperative treatment of MIBC (9, 10).

Integrin β-6 (IB6) is a promising ADC target currently under investigation in clinical trials with MMAE and TOP1 inhibitor ADCs sigvotatug vedotin (SV; NCT04389632) and PF-08046876 (NCT07090499). Integrins are membrane-associated protein heterodimers with diverse roles in motility, cellular adhesion, and cytokinesis (11–18). The heterodimers consist of an α chain and a β chain, with 18 α and 8 β subunits that create a total of 24 unique heterodimers. IB6 forms an exclusive heterodimer with the α-v chain (αvβ6) and is upregulated during wound repair and pathogenesis (11–13, 16). IB6 is expressed in numerous solid tumors and has been proposed as a negative prognostic indicator in several cancers, including colorectal, non–small cell lung, gastric, and cervical (19–23). In this study, we show that IB6 is also expressed in bladder cancer, including NMIBC, consistently and at high levels.

PF-08052667 is an IB6-directed ADC designed to enhance potency by delivering MMAE intracellularly via a PEGylated glucuronide (PEGgluc) linker that has been shown to increase payload retention in the target cell (24). PF-08052667 consists of the same humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and MMAE payload as SV but delivers twice the amount of MMAE per ADC, with a DAR of 8. This linker-payload combination has been shown to be significantly more active preclinically than the valine–citrulline linker currently used in most clinical MMAE ADCs (24).

After delivery to the cytoplasm, MMAE induces tumor cell killing by interfering with the assembly and function of microtubules, resulting in cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis (25). MMAE can diffuse across cell membranes and cause bystander killing of adjacent tumor cells (26). Additionally, MMAE has been shown to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD; refs. 27, 28), leading to numerous clinical trials combining MMAE-class ADCs with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and multiple approvals for systemically administered therapies in later-line urothelial cancer (9, 10).

The standard-of-care treatment for NMIBC involves intravesical drug administration. In this procedure, the patient is catheterized, and the formulation of drugs such as BCG is instilled for a period of up to 2 hours, after which the patient voids the formulation. Although ADCs have demonstrated great success in later-stage bladder cancer, there is an unmet need for improved therapies, including ADCs, in NMIBC. By leveraging learnings gained across the ADC field, an ADC can be designed specifically for the transient but direct dosing achieved with intravesical administration. We hypothesized that optimization of target, payload, DAR, and administration could yield an ADC with enhanced access to the urothelium and NMIBC tumors, with improved penetration, residence time, and activity in bladder tissue than current ADCs designed for intravenous administration, which have previously demonstrated potential in this field (29, 30).

This report details the preclinical profile of PF-08052667, an MMAE-based ADC designed specifically for intravesical administration. Consistent with the proposed MOA, PF-08052667 showed efficient internalization, cytotoxic activity on 11 cancer cell lines and 29 patient-derived organoids (PDOs) of NMIBC with varying levels of IB6 expression, and induction of ICD hallmarks in vitro. Efficacy was observed in orthotopic IB6-expressing cancer models in mice, with the application of a prewash driving enhanced delivery of MMAE to the bladder tissue and improved activity. Finally, toxicology studies demonstrated minimal local effects in the bladder, with no systemic toxicity and minimal to no detectable systemic exposure to PF-08052667 when administered with or without the bladder prewash. Overall, the structure and delivery of PF-08052667 were designed and optimized for enhanced potency and safety to generate a first-in-class ADC specifically for the intravesical treatment of NMIBC.

Materials and Methods

Immunohistochemistry assessment of IB6 expression

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for IB6 expression was performed on normal bladder and bladder cancer, including NMIBC subtypes, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Commercially sourced bladder cancer samples included n = 3/subtype (unless otherwise noted) of Tis/CIS, Ta, T1, T2, T2a, T2b, T3, T3a, T3b (2), T4a, and T4 (1). The IHC procedures involved deparaffinization followed by antigen retrieval in the NxGen decloaking chamber (Biocare Medical) using the 110°C program with Diva Retrieval Solution. Slide staining using the intelliPATH automated stainer (Biocare Medical) involved pretreatment with peroxidase, avidin, biotin, and Sniper protein blocking agents, followed by the application of the primary rabbit anti-IB6 antibody (Seagen M6.2A1, lot #207713-06) at 1:5,000 (3 μL of antibody and 15,000 μL of Da Vinci Green diluent), a secondary HRP anti-rat polymer antibody (Envision), and then incubation with ImmPACT DAB (Vector). The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed, cleared, and cover slipped using the Prisma Plus Stainer. IHC evaluation included confirmatory IB6-positive control tissue (1223170B normal human placenta) and negative isotype control rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch ChromPure, lot #011-000-003, RRID: AB_2337118) staining. Images were captured using the Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica, RRID: SCR_021256) and reviewed by an ACVP board–certified veterinary pathologist. IHC evaluation was based on a qualitative scoring assessment of stain intensity (0 = none; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong), stain frequency (0 = none; 1 = >0% to 25%; 2 = 26%–50%; 3 = 51%–75%; and 4 = >75% tumor cells), and stain localization (M = membranous; C = cytoplasmic; N = nuclear; A = apical; and G = Golgi). Specific IHC staining was determined based on the stain characteristics and in consideration of comparative negative and positive control samples.

IHC staining for IB6 expression on orthotopic bladder tumors was performed at Pfizer using rabbit anti-IB6 antibody clone SG44 20B8 A3 and Thermo Fisher CD147 clone 125 (RRID: AB_2784992). The slides were baked in an oven for 1 hour at 61°C prior to the IHC run. The IB6 SG44 20B8 A3 antibody was conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 using the Invitrogen Alexa Fluor Antibody Labeling Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 704060). Isotype rabbit IgG (Abcam, 172730, RRID: AB_2687931) was used as a negative control. The samples were run on the BOND RX Autostainer (Leica) at ambient temperature following the manufacturer’s instructions with the BOND Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Leica, DS9800). Images were captured using the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360 Digital Slide Scanner (RRID: SCR_023761) and uploaded into OMERO (RRID: SCR_002629) for image review.

RNA expression and protein abundance

The frozen tumors (n = 13) were obtained from BioIVT. Each tumor was split in half for DIA-MS proteomics and RNA-seq. RNA-seq was performed via GENEWIZ NGS Services from Azenta Life Sciences for paired-end sequencing. Proteomics analysis followed a standard global proteomics workflow. The samples were homogenized and lysed in 1% SDS/RIPA buffer with Precellys beads. Proteins were cleaned and digested following single-pot solid phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3). Data acquisition was performed on a Zeno SWATH DIA platform (SCIEX ZenoTOF7600) coupled with a 30-minute LC gradient (Waters ACQUITY UPLC M-Class). Data analysis was performed in DIA-NN version 2.2 (RRID: SCR_022865) using an in silico spectral library. Gene-level quantification was reported with DIA-NN’s embedded QuantUMS algorithm.

Generation of IB6 antibodies, drug linker, and conjugation of PF-08052667

Detailed experimental procedures for the generation and humanization of 2A2 and the preparation of the drug linker have been previously described (24, 31, 32). PF-08052667 was prepared by full reduction of the antibody interchain disulfides followed by the addition of a 50% excess of maleimide–linker payload, as described previously (Supplementary Fig. S1A; refs. 31, 32). Representative analytical results for PF-08052667 are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. The murine monoclonal 15H3 (m15H3) was generated using standard hybridoma technology following the immunization of mice with target antigen–expressing cells, followed by humanization via CDR grafting. The details are shown in the section below. The resulting h15H3 antibody binds human, cynomolgus monkey, rat, and mouse IB6 protein (Supplementary Table S1), whereas h2A2 binds only human and cynomolgus monkey IB6 (0.2 and 0.3 nmol/L, respectively; ref. (32). The rodent binding profile of h15H3 (0.3–0.4 nmol/L) allowed for the generation of a surrogate ADC with a comparable binding affinity to that of h2A2 that could be used for investigative studies in rodents.

h15H3 antibody generation and humanization

The BALB/c mice were immunized 3 times with intraperitoneal injections of ∼5 × 106 3T3:huβ6 transfectants. Three days prior to fusion, the mice received a final injection of purified recombinant human αvβ6 that was given intravenously (6 μg) and intraperitoneally (30 μg). Lymphocytes harvested from the spleen and lymph nodes were fused to P3X63Ag8.653 myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol. Fused cells were recovered overnight in hybridoma growth media (Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium containing 4 mmol/L of glutamine, 10% FetalClone I, 10% cloning factor, and penicillin/streptomycin). Following recovery, cells were spun down and then plated in semisolid media, consisting of CloneMatrix media supplemented with hybridoma growth media plus HAT for hybridoma selection and CloneDetect for IgG production. Hybridomas were incubated for 10 days at 37°C. At day 10, IgG-producing hybridoma clones were picked using a ClonePixFL (Molecular Devices) and transferred to 96-well plates containing IgG-depleted hybridoma growth media plus HT. Hybridoma culture supernatants were screened on 293F:huβ6 transfectants, and positive clones were identified using an Alexa Fluor 647–labeled secondary antibody for detection (Invitrogen, A21445, RRID: AB_2535862). The plates were read on an FMAT 8200 (Applied Biosystems). Hybridomas that bound to 293F:huβ6 and 293F:cynoβ6 but not 293F:vector were expanded for direct conjugation using the method described in International Application No. WO 2011/109308. The directly conjugated antibody panel was tested in binding and cytotoxicity assays. m15H3 was selected as the lead antibody because it showed cytotoxic activity as an ADC on multiple αvβ6-positive tumor cell lines, and it had comparable affinity to human and cynomolgus forms of the antigen. The specificity of mouse 15H3 and humanized 15H3 was confirmed in FMAT and FACS binding studies, in which the antibodies were shown to bind to 293F:huβ6 transfectants but not to the αvβ5-positive parental line (293F:vector). The binding specificity of m15H3 and h15H3 was also confirmed via ELISA, in which the antibodies were bound to recombinant human αvβ6 but not αvβ3 or αvβ8.

The murine 15H3 antibody was humanized using genomic sequences provided by VH1-46 and JH4 for the heavy chain and by VK2-30 and Jk2 for the light chain. In the first humanization round, 13 positions were identified in the heavy chain (H28, H30, H38, H40, H41, H48, H66, H67, H69, H71, H72, H93, and H108), and six positions were identified in the light chain (L21, L22, L36, L37, L45, and L63) at which the human acceptor sequence differed from the donor sequence and that may affect antibody binding as a result of contacting the antigen directly, affecting the conformation of CDRs, or affecting the packing between heavy and light chains. Eight humanized heavy chains and five humanized light chains were made, incorporating back mutations at different permutations of these positions. The remaining positions are occupied by the residues from the human acceptor sequence.

Cell lines and culture

The cancer cells were obtained from suppliers with lot numbers listed in Supplementary Table S2 and grown according to the recommendations provided. The cell lines were expanded upon receipt and cryo-frozen in aliquots between passages 3 and 5. The cells were authenticated and confirmed to be Mycoplasma-negative using IDEXX BioAnalytics, using STR-based DNA profiling and multiplex PCR. All cell lines were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in the relevant growth media, with assays performed between passages 3 and 22 or less than 6 weeks in culture.

Cross-species cell surface expression and flow cytometry assays

Flow cytometry studies to evaluate species cross-reactivity of the h2A2 antibody were conducted using the following antigen-expressing cell lines: 293F:hu β-6 transfectant, 293F:cyno β-6 transfectant (parental 293F RRID:CVCL_6642), FDC-P1 mouse β-6 transfectant (parental FDC-P1 RRID:CVCL_2039), and NBT-II rat bladder carcinoma cells (RRID: CVCL_0453). For transfected cell lines, the parental cells were included as controls. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies over a concentration range of 0 to 300 nmol/L for 30 minutes at 4°C. NBT-II and FDC-P1 cells were incubated with primary antibodies at 75 nmol/L for 30 minutes at 4°C. The cells were then washed twice with FACS buffer (PBS, 2% FBS, 0.02% NaN3, 1 mmol/L of MnCl2 for 293F and FDC-P1 cells; TBS, 2% FBS, 0.02% NaN3, 1 mmol/L of MnCl2 for NBT-II cells) before incubation with an Alexa Fluor 488–labeled secondary antibody for 30 minutes at 4°C. The cells were again washed twice and resuspended in FACS buffer before the acquisition of samples on an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (Thermo Fisher, RRID: SCR_019590).

Saturation binding studies were conducted using the following cell lines: UM-UC-3 bladder cancer parental cell line (<1,000 receptor copies αvβ6 per cell, RRID: CVCL_1783), UM-UC-3 1A2 bladder–engineered IB6-expressing clonal cell line (125,000 receptor copies per cell), or HEK293 cell lines transfected with human and cyno IB6 orthologs (parental HEK293, RRID: CVCL_0045). The cells were aliquoted at 1 × 105 cells per well into a 96-well V-bottom plate. The primary antibodies were added to the cells at concentrations ranging from 100 nmol/L to 0.3 pmol/L in FACS buffer (TBS, 2% FBS, and 1 mmol/L MnCl2). The cells were incubated for 1 hour and then pelleted and washed 2 times with FACS buffer. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in a 10-μg/mL solution of an FITC-conjugated anti-human Fc secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 109-096-098, RRID: AB_2337668) prediluted in FACS buffer. After a 45-minute incubation, the cells were pelleted and washed 2 times with FACS buffer. Upon resuspension in a 1% paraformaldehyde solution to 1 × 106 cells/mL, fluorescence was detected using an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer. Fluorescence geometric mean was assessed via flow cytometry and calculated with FlowJo version 10.8 Software (RRID: SCR_008520). EC50 was calculated using GraphPad Prism Software (RRID: SCR_002798).

Flow cytometry was used to quantify IB6 protein expression on the surface of cancer cell lines and PDOs using the Human IgG Calibrator Kit (Biocytex, CP010). PDOs and cells were dissociated with TrypLE (Thermo Fisher, 12605010) for 5 to 10 minutes at 37°C and then distributed into 96-well V-bottom plates (2 × 105 cells/well). The cells were stained with h2A2 primary antibody (1 hour, 4°C), anti-IgG-FITC (45 minutes, 4°C), and DAPI (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-111-570; 5 minutes). Samples were acquired within 4 hours on a MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec, RRID: SCR_020268) or Attune NxT Flow Cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo version 10.8. Antigen-binding capacity (ABC) and specific ABC (SABC) were determined using calibration beads and isotype controls.

Internalization and intracellular trafficking of PF-08052667

Visualization of PF-08052667 on the plasma membrane of SW780 cells (RRID: CVCL_1728) and colocalization with lysosomes after internalization were performed via immunofluorescence. The cells were treated with 2 μg/mL of PF-08052667 and preincubated on ice for 30 minutes. The treated cells were washed with PBS to remove the unbound ADC and then immediately fixed and permeabilized (0-hour time point) or further incubated at 37°C for the 4-hour time point. The cells were stained with an anti-human IgG antibody (Invitrogen, A11013, RRID: AB_2534080) to detect PF-08052667, the anti-LAMP1 lysosome marker (BD Pharmingen, 562622, RRID: AB_2737684), and Hoechst (Invitrogen, 62249) to label nuclear DNA. Images were collected using the ImageXpress High-Content Confocal HT.ai system (Molecular Devices, RRID: SCR_020294).

Internalization was evaluated on IB6-expressing bladder cancer cell lines SW780, UM-UC-5 (RRID: CVCL_2750), UM-UC-3 1A2 IB6, and UM-UC-3 2F4 IB6 via automated fluorescence microscopy in a live cell kinetic assay using quenched fluorophore conjugates (Supplementary Fig. S1B). The cells were seeded in a 96-well plate, and quenched fluorophore (QF) antibody conjugates were added at 2 μg/mL. The antibody backbone of PF-08052667 (h2A2) was conjugated as a two-load to a fluorophore (sulfo-Cy5) and quencher (Tide Quencher %WS, AAT Bioquest) pair through a glucuronide linker (glucQF) to generate the antibody conjugate h2A2glucQF with fluorophore. A nonbinding mAb glucQF conjugate (h00glucQF) was used as a negative control. The fluorescence signal was measured by collecting images every 2 hours using the Incucyte SX5 (Sartorius, RRID: SCR_026298). The amount of Cy5 liberated from the antibody–quencher conjugate was quantified as the total integrated signal intensity and normalized to cell confluence for each time point. The data were graphed using GraphPad Prism software.

Cell viability assay to assess the cytotoxicity of PF-08052667

The cells were thawed from liquid nitrogen storage and allowed to recover until viability, determined via Vi-CELL XR (Beckman Coulter, RRID: SCR_019664), was above 90%. The cells were then plated in 384-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. Serial dilutions of the ADCs were prepared in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, added to each cell plate in quadruplicate, and incubated for 96 hours. CellTiter-Glo luminescent assay reagent (Promega) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and fluorescence was determined using the EnVision Multilabel Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer). The data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using a nonlinear, four-parameter curve-fit model [Y = Bottom + (Top-Bottom)/(1 + 10((LogEC50− X) × HillSlope))]. Cell viability was tested on BxPC3 (RRID: CVCL_0186), Detroit 562 (RRID: CVCL_1171), EBC-1 (RRID: CVCL_2891), FaDu (RRID: CVCL_1218), HPAF-II (RRID: CVCL_0313), SW780, UM-UC-5, A549 (RRID: CVCL_0023), A549 IB6 2B5, A549 3E8, UM-UC-3, UM-UC-3 IB6 1A2, and UM-UC-3 IB6 2F4.

PDO establishment and culturing

Bladder tissue samples for organoid establishment were collected during surgery with approval from the ethics committees of the University Medical Centre Utrecht (Biobanking protocol HUB-Cancer, TCBIO, 12-093). Samples were obtained from 3 hospitals: University Medical Centre Utrecht, Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort, and Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Most bladder PDOs originated from low-grade NMIBCs (pT0, pTis, pTa, and pT1), as determined by pathologic assessment. The tumor tissue was cut into small pieces (1–2 mm) using a surgical blade and digested with Collagenase II in the bladder organoid medium supplemented with ROCK inhibitor (5 μmol/L). After centrifugation, the pellet was embedded in 80% BME and plated in prewarmed six-well plates. Tumor cells collected from urine samples were washed and plated directly. Once the BME solidified, the bladder organoid medium was added. The organoids were passaged every 14 to 21 days using mechanical dissociation by pipetting. ROCK inhibitor (10 μmol/L) was added after passaging to prevent anoikis. The medium was refreshed 3 times per week. The organoids were cryopreserved in Recovery Cell Culture Freezing Medium (Thermo Fisher, 12648010). Organoid identity was confirmed using a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array targeting 60 SNPs with TaqMan OpenArray technology and the QuantStudio 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System at the Utrecht Sequencing Facility. The organoids were routinely tested for Mycoplasma contamination, and they consistently tested negative.

Bladder organoid media

The human bladder organoid medium is composed of Advanced DMEM/F-12 (Thermo Fisher, 12634010), HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L, Lonza, 17737E), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL, Thermo Fisher, 15070-063), GlutaMAX (2 mmol/L, Thermo Fisher, 35050038), FGF10 (100 ng/mL, PeproTech, 100-26), FGF7 (25 ng/mL, PeproTech, 100-19), FGF2 (12.5 ng/mL, PeproTech, 100-18B), B27 supplement (1x, Thermo Fisher, 17504001), A83-01 (5 μmol/L, Tocris, 2939), N-acetylcysteine (1.25 mmol/L, Sigma-Aldrich, A9165), nicotinamide (10 mmol/L, Sigma-Aldrich, N0636), ROCK inhibitor (5 μmol/L, Y-27632, AbMole, M1817-50), and Primocin (50 μg/mL, InvivoGene SAS, ANT-PM-2).

PDO viability assay to assess the potency of PF-08052667

Twenty-nine bladder cancer PDOs were screened for drug sensitivity. For screening, PDOs were mechanically dissociated and replated 2 to 6 days prior, depending on growth. On days 2 to 6, PDOs were harvested by incubating with Dispase II (1 mg/mL; Thermo Fisher, 17105041) for 30 minutes at 37°C to digest the basement membrane extract (BME; Bio-Techne, 3533-010-02). The PDOs were resuspended in bladder organoid medium supplemented with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632, 5 μmol/L; AbMole Bioscience #M1817) and 5% BME. Using a Multidrop Combi dispenser, 375 organoids were plated in 384-well ultralow-attachment plates (Corning, 4588). A nine-dose drug concentration range was added using a Tecan Fluent liquid handler. Cell viability was measured on day 6 using CellTiter-Glo 3D (Promega, G9681) on a Tecan Spark multimode microplate reader (RRID: SCR_021897); baseline viability was measured on day 0 in untreated controls. Screens were performed in technical triplicates. Percentage viability and growth rate (GR) inhibition metrics were calculated (33), and IC50, GR50, and GRAOC values were determined.

ATP release assay

The SW780 cells were plated at 2 × 104 cells/well in the 96-well plates and treated with 1 μg/mL of ADC, antibody, or 10 nmol/L of MMAE. The extracellular ATP was measured 70 hours after treatment using the RealTime-Glo Extracellular ATP Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and luminescence was measured using the Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (Agilent BioTek, RRID: SCR_019732). ATP release is reported as fold change over untreated cells, normalized to background signal.

High-mobility box 1 release assay

The SW780 cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells/well in the 12-well tissue culture–treated plates and treated with 1 μg/mL of ADC, antibody, or 10 nmol/L of MMAE. High-mobility box 1 (HMGB1) release was measured 96 hours after treatment via standard ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Tecan, 30164033). The optical density was measured at 450 nm with an Envision Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer, RRID: SCR_018038). HMGB1 release is reported as fold change over the signal of untreated cells.

Cell surface calreticulin

The SW780 cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells/well in the 12-well tissue culture–treated plates and treated with 0.15 μg/mL of ADC, antibody, or 1.5 nmol/L of MMAE. Then, 120 hours after treatment, the cells were harvested using nonenzymatic dissociation buffer. The cells were spun down at 300 × g for 3 minutes and resuspended in staining buffer consisting of FACS buffer [(DPBS + 2% FBS) + Calreticulin AF647 (1:50), Abcam, AB196159, RRID: AB_2819061]. The cells were incubated on ice for 30 minutes, protected from light. They were washed twice with FACS buffer and then resuspended in staining buffer consisting of 1x binding buffer + Annexin V-PE (1:20) and 7-AAD (1:20; BioLegend, 64093). The cells were incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature, protected from light, and then analyzed on an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer. Calreticulin was measured in live Annexin V+7-AAD−/lo gated cells using FlowJo version 10.8.

Animal use ethics statement

Studies with cell line–derived xenografts were performed at Pfizer. Pfizer is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. All experiments involving animal handling and study designs were approved under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines and appropriate animal research approvals. Studies were conducted in compliance with facility standard operating procedures and in accordance with the Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act and the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animals were purpose-bred and experimentally naïve at the outset of the studies.

Intravesical dosing and translation across species

Intravesical dosing uses a transurethral catheter to empty residual urine and deliver test materials directly into the bladder. In small animals, especially male rodents, this can be challenging due to complex urethral anatomy, which may increase procedural effects and variability. Larger animals allow for easier administration with fewer procedural effects. However, through optimization of the dosing method and the use of flexible urinary catheters, these procedural effects can be reduced, making female rodent models feasible for studies on orthotopic activity and tissue permeation.

Supplementary Table S3 displays the cross-species translation of intravesical doses based on the total dose/bladder surface area (mg/cm2) utilized in the development program. Dose scaling on body surface area is not appropriate due to limited systemic exposure and the local administration dose route; instead, the total dose has been normalized to bladder tissue surface area (34). Bladder surface area was derived from the volume of the bladder in which V = (4/3)πr3 and SA = 4πr2 with the estimates based on the average static bladder size: specifically Vmouse = 0.15 mL and SAmouse = 1.37 cm2, Vrat = 1 mL and SArat = 4.83 cm2, VNHP = 61.8 mL and SANHP = 75.43 cm2, and VHuman = 500 mL and SAHuman = 304.19 cm2.

Bladder tissue penetration studies using a rodent cross-reactive IB6 ADC surrogate

To assess the effects of bladder prewash prior to ADC administration on MMAE levels and penetration into the bladder tissue, a rat cross-reactive surrogate IB6 ADC, h15H3-5088(8), was administered via a single intravesical dose with 3Fr closed-end feline urinary catheters (Tom Tiddle, HB02221A). Only female rats were used as urethra anatomical differences in male rodents make catheterization challenging, causing procedural damage. After dosing 1.2 mg/cm2 of the surrogate ADC for a 60-minute dwell time ± bladder prewash of 0.1% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM), the bladder tissue was collected after 1, 6, 48, 120, or 168 hours (n = 2/time point) after dose. The tissue was flash-frozen for bioanalytical analysis of the total unconjugated MMAE from homogenized bladder tissue and/or fixed for immunohistochemical staining with an anti-MMAE antibody to examine the penetration of the drug within the bladder tissue layers. When both IHC and bioanalytical methods were to be performed, removed bladders were halved at the midline and fixed or frozen as appropriate. To assess the effect of dwell time ± bladder prewash, surrogate ADC was administered as a single intravesical dose of 0.8 mg/cm2 for dwell times of 15, 30, 60, or 90 minutes. The bladder tissue was collected 24 hours after the dose (n = 3/group) for bioanalytical analysis. The total unconjugated MMAE in the bladder tissue was quantitated via solid-phase extraction and reverse-phase LC–MS/MS following tissue homogenization and protein precipitation. Systemic exposures were evaluated in rat plasma for total antibody; however, the observed exposures were highly variable between individuals, and in the 7-day kinetic study, they represented less than 6.2% of the administered dose.

IHC for MMAE was performed on FFPE rat urinary bladder tissues from an exploratory rat pharmacokinetic study involving intravesical treatment with the rat cross-reactive IB6 ADC surrogate, h15H3-5088(8), at 1.2 mg/cm2. The IHC procedures involved deparaffinization followed by antigen retrieval in the NxGen Decloaking Chamber (Biocare Medical) using the 110°C program with Diva Retrieval Solution. Slide staining using the intelliPATH automated stainer (Biocare Medical) involved pretreatment with peroxidase, avidin, biotin, and Sniper protein blocking agents, followed by the application of the primary mouse anti-MMAE mAb (Seagen 15.22.F4.1B10.1C10) at 2 μg/mL, a secondary biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Jackson Immuno, 715-065-151, RRID: AB_2340785) at 1:1,000, and then incubation with Vector ABC Elite HRP and DAB. The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed, cleared, and cover slipped using the Tissue-Tek Prisma Plus Stainer. IHC evaluation included confirmatory MMAE-positive control tissue (rat liver) and negative isotype control rabbit IgG (Abcam 172730) staining. Images were captured using the P1000 slide scanner (3DHISTECH) and reviewed by an ACVP board–certified veterinary pathologist. IHC evaluation was based on a qualitative scoring assessment of stain intensity (0 = none; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong), stain frequency (0 = none; 1 = >0% to 25%; 2 = 26%–50%; 3 = 51%–75%; and 4 = >75% tumor cells), and stain localization (M = membranous; C = cytoplasmic; N = nuclear; A = apical; and G = Golgi). Specific IHC staining was determined based on the stain characteristics and in consideration of comparative negative and positive control samples.

Nonclinical safety evaluation

PF-08052667 was evaluated for toxicologic effects in an exploratory non-GLP single-dose study (n = 1/sex/group) and a weekly for 6-weeks (Q1Wx6, n = 3/sex/group) GLP-compliant repeat-dose toxicology study in the pharmacologically relevant cynomolgus monkey model (Macaca fascicularis). Doses up to 1.3 mg/cm2 of PF-08052667 were administered via intravesical administration with or without a 0.1% DDM prewash. DDM was evaluated in a manner consistent with the intended clinical use, as a mucosal barrier prewash given as a short-duration intravesical instillation (up to 10 minutes) alone. Following the prewash, when applicable, vehicle or ADC, PF-08052667, was administered intravesically. A previously performed non-GLP intravenous single-dose toxicity study was also leveraged to identify potential toxicities secondary to systemic exposure (n = 2/sex/group). However, due to the lack of systemic exposure observed upon intravesical administration, this study is not considered necessary for development but was incorporated as previously available. Animals were assessed for evidence of toxicity, including mortality, clinical observations, body weights, and clinical pathology (hematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis). At study termination, macroscopic evaluations, organ weights, and tissue samples were collected for microscopic evaluation. Systemic exposures were evaluated for total antibody in plasma via ELISA or Gyrolab immunoassay (Gyros Protein Technologies) with lower limits of quantitation (LLOQ) between 2 and 100 ng/mL, and for the total unconjugated MMAE in plasma via LC–MS/MS with an LLOQ of 0.01 ng/mL. In the 6-week GLP study, the bladder tissue was collected 1 week after the last dose when terminal collections for histopathology were planned, and local tissue exposure was evaluated for the total unconjugated MMAE via LC–MS/MS with an LLOQ of 0.1 ng/g.

Orthotopic murine models

The SW-780 bladder cancer cells were engineered to express red luciferase, and UM-UC-3 cells were engineered to express red luciferase and IB6 due to a lack of endogenous target expression. Clonal cell lines were selected and characterized for human IB6 surface expression via qFACS and the optical activity of cell lines via bioluminescence imaging on the IVIS SpectrumCT. For these experiments, sixty 12- to 16-week-old female NSG (RRID: IMSR_JAX:005557) or SCID (RRID: IMSR_CRL:236) mice were instilled with 2 million SW780-RL+ or UMUC3-IB6+RL+ cells via a 24-gauge Terumo Surflo IV catheter, following a pretreatment regimen of 0.1% DDM (Sigma, 69227-93-6) and 0.1% poly-L-lysine (Sigma, P8920). After the 45-minute cell inoculation period, the catheters were removed, and the mice were closely monitored until recovery from anesthesia. Two to three weeks later, the mice were injected with 150 mg/kg of Luciferin IP and imaged after 15 minutes to quantify the bioluminescence signal in the bladder region. The mice were randomized into groups of 5 to 7 to achieve a consistent mean bioluminescence signal. The treated mice received 4 weekly doses of 0.2 or 0.6 mg/cm2 of PF-08052667 or vehicle in 50 μL for 60 minutes via a soft, beveled catheter to reduce procedural trauma (Instech C20PU-RCA1935) and escape of test agents into circulation. The select groups received a bladder prewash of 100 μL of 0.1% DDM for 10 minutes immediately prior to PF-08052667 or vehicle. Additionally, treatment with PF-08052667 along with prewash for 15- versus 60-minute dwell times was compared in these studies. Tumor growth was monitored 1 to 2 times weekly using bioluminescence imaging, and body weights were collected at each imaging time point. Survival events were recorded in UMUC3-IB6+RL+ using clinical endpoints of hematuria, palpable bladder, body weight loss, and/or bladder signal greater than 1 × 1010 photons/second and followed for 71 days after dose initiation. The SW780-RL+ study was terminated 55 days after enrollment due to slow progression of disease.

Statistical analysis

A normalized and robust area under the curve (AUC) metric was used for measuring efficacy. The AUC metric captures the average slope of all data points collected regardless of the endpoint and is considered a more efficient and statistically supported endpoint metric for comparing data with log-linear tumor growth kinetics (35). A complete response (CR) is defined when the bioluminescence signal in the bladder region is quantified at or below the baseline signal of 1 × 105 photons/second ±20% (based on historic data generated in non–tumor-bearing mice) for the final three consecutive bioluminescence measurements. The statistical significance comparing the differences in AUC was assessed via one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test. Survival events are defined as tumor-bearing mice reaching clinical endpoints indicative of high tumor burden (e.g., severe hematuria, palpable bladder, and/or bladder signal >1 × 1010 photons/second). The median survival was compared across groups, and the Mantel–Cox log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance.

Results

Expression of IB6 in NMIBC and normal bladder tissue

IB6 expression was evaluated via IHC staining on normal human urinary bladder, cynomolgus monkey urinary bladder, and human bladder cancer tumor samples using an anti-αvβ6 antibody. IHC evaluation revealed strong stain intensity in bladder cancer (NMIBC and MIBC) samples and normal human urinary bladder and moderate stain intensity in normal cynomolgus urinary bladder, with high stain frequency and target accessibility (membranous) in both normal urinary tissues and bladder tumor cells. Across the bladder cancer subtypes tested, there was no difference in the intensity or frequency of IB6 expression. Representative bladder cancer images and a summary of expression in bladder cancer or normal bladder are shown in Fig. 1A–C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

IB6 expression in bladder cancer and normal bladder tissue. A and B, Representative images of human bladder cancer stained for IB6 at 8x (left) and 10x (right). A, NMIBC Tis/CIS: strong, diffuse IB6 staining of papillary tumor cells expanding the urothelium (star). B, NMIBC T3a: strong, diffuse IB6 staining of urothelial tumor cells expanding the urothelium (stars) and invading the lamina propria (arrow). C, Summary of IB6 protein expression in FFPE samples from human bladder cancer (NMIBC and MIBC), normal human bladder, or normal cyno bladder evaluated by a pathologist for subcellular localization in cells using qualitative scoring assessment of stain intensity (2 = moderate and 3 = strong) and frequency (means shown). Membrane and cytoplasmic staining were positive for each tissue type. D and E, Matched RNA abundance and protein abundance of select bladder cancer–associated genes derived from 12 frozen NMIBC tumor samples. LFQ, label-free quantification; TPM, transcripts per million.

Additionally, RNA and protein expression were quantified in 12 matched frozen NMIBC tumor samples. The RNA transcripts and protein abundance were compared across select genes targeted in bladder cancer therapy (36–38), revealing discordance between RNA expression and protein abundance of IB6. IB6 demonstrated low RNA transcript levels but high protein abundance relative to the comparators (Fig. 1D and E).

In vitro MOA characterization of PF-08052667

The intracellular delivery of cytotoxic payloads by ADCs involves antigen binding on target cells, internalization, and trafficking to lysosomes. Consistent with this MOA, we have previously shown that the parental antibody for PF-08052667, h2A2, binds exclusively to the integrin dimer αvβ6 via ELISA (32). Although h2A2 does not bind to mouse or rat orthologs, the binding affinity of h2A2 to human and cyno IB6, as determined by saturation binding using transfectant 293F cell lines, showed highly concordant EC50 values of 0.3 and 0.2 nmol/L for human and cyno IB6, respectively (32). To ensure that the conjugation of the linker-payload did not inhibit h2A2 binding to its target, the h2A2 antibody and PF-08052667 were evaluated for binding to UM-UC-3 parental cells and UM-UC-3 cells engineered to express human IB6. PF-08052667 and the h2A2 antibody exhibited comparable binding curves in this assay, with an EC50 of 0.08 and 0.10 nmol/L, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3).

To confirm internalization, PF-08052667 was first detected on the plasma membrane surface of the IB6-positive human bladder cancer cell line SW780 following a brief incubation on ice to allow ADC binding [Fig. 2A (left); Supplementary Fig. S4]. After a 4-hour incubation at 37°C, most of the PF-08052667 signal was shown to internalize and colocalize with LAMP1-stained vesicles [Fig. 2A (right); Supplementary Fig. S4], indicating trafficking to lysosomes. The PF-08052667 signal on the plasma membrane also progressively decreased over the 4 hours, indicating internalization of the ADC [Fig. 2A (right); Supplementary Fig. S4].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

In vitro characterization of PF-08052667. Internalization, cytotoxicity, and ICD hallmarks are driven by PF-08052667. A, PF-08052667 (green), lysosomal marker LAMP1 (red), and Hoechst DNA stain (blue). After PF-08052667 treatment, SW780 cells were fixed immediately (left) or incubated at 37°C for 4 hours (right) to show intracellular colocalization with lysosomes. B, Internalization of PF-08052667 as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) per cell over time in IB6-positive bladder cell lines by quenched fluorophore assay (n = 2 biological and 2 technical replicates per line). C–E, PF-08052667 cytotoxicity on (C) 11 IB6-expressing cell lines by CellTiter-Glo (n = 4), and (D and E) 29 bladder cancer PDOs (n = 3) using GR inhibition area over the curve (AOC) metrics, with increasing values representing more growth inhibition as a (D) heatmap or (E) bar graph, ***, P < 0.001. F–H, Detection of hallmarks of ICD: extracellular ATP, HMGB1, and surface calreticulin from the SW780 cell line (n = 2 for each assay, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). IgG1-DAR4 control, untargeted ADC with SV-matched linker-payload; IgG1-DAR8 control, untargeted ADC with PF-08052667-matched linker-payload; IB6 mAb, unconjugated antibody of PF-08052667; SV, sigvotatug vedotin.

The ADC cell surface binding and intracellular trafficking kinetics were assessed by an orthogonal assay that used fluorescence to visualize internalization and drug linker cleavage in IB6-expressing bladder cancer cell lines (Supplementary Table S4). The h2A2 antibody backbone of PF-08052667 was conjugated to a dye and quencher pair using the same glucQF as in PF-08052667 (Supplementary Fig. S1B). The quencher prevents the Cy5 dye from emitting fluorescence until the antibody is internalized and catabolized, leading to the release of the dye from the antibody and quencher. The internalization of antibody–glucQF conjugates h2A2glucQF and nonbinding control h00glucQF was detected by a fluorescent signal due to the unquenching of the fluorophore upon linker cleavage by intracellular glucuronidase. Fluorescence was then quantified by imaging cells every 2 hours and normalizing the fluorescence intensity to cell confluence. The fluorescent signal of h2A2glucQF steadily increased over time, indicative of internalization and linker cleavage (Fig. 2B).

The ability of PF-08052667 to elicit cytotoxicity consistent with the proposed MOA was evaluated in a 96-hour assay with a panel of cancer cell lines endogenously expressing or engineered to express IB6 (Supplementary Table S4). PF-08052667 exhibited cytotoxic activity in all IB6-expressing cell lines (Fig. 2C). In 10 of 11 cell lines tested, the absolute EC50 (X50) values were below 100 ng/mL, ranging from 0.38 to 81.81 ng/mL (Supplementary Table S4). In addition, all cell lines were sensitive to the unconjugated MMAE payload, whereas no activity was observed with the nonbinding ADC control with the same MMAE payload or on IB6-negative cell lines. Overall, these results show that PF-08052667 elicits in vitro cytotoxicity on a range of IB6-expressing cancer cell lines.

Finally, we tested the cytotoxic effect of PF-08052667 on PDOs (Supplementary Table S5). The IB6 expression level for 29 bladder cancer PDOs (5 MIBCs and 24 NMIBCs) was quantified via SABC (Supplementary Fig. S5A) before each PDO was incubated with PF-08052667, SV, or a positive or negative ADC control at nine concentrations for 6 days. A summary of responses, represented by a heatmap of GR50 and GRAOC metrics determined by an ATP-based viability assay (Fig. 2D and E), demonstrated a wide breadth of activity of PF-08052667 across IB6 expression levels, and responses were comparable across MIBC and NMIBC subtypes. The GR50 values and representative cell kill curves are shown in Supplementary Table S6 and Supplementary Fig. S5, respectively.

PF-08052667 induces hallmarks of ICD

ADCs delivering MMAE with the valine–citrulline linker (vedotin ADCs) have been shown to induce ICD, a distinct type of cell death that can lead to adaptive immune responses and the establishment of immunologic memory (27, 28, 39). The ability of PF-08052667 to induce molecular hallmarks of ICD, such as the exposure of calreticulin on the cell surface and the release of ATP and HMGB1 (39), was compared with that of the unconjugated IB6 mAb as a negative control and to SV and unconjugated MMAE as positive controls in vitro. At 70 hours after PF-08052667 treatment, SW780 cells demonstrated significant cellular release of ATP comparable with SV and MMAE controls (P < 0.05; Fig. 2F), and a similar effect was observed with HMGB1 release 96 hours after PF-08052667 treatment (P < 0.05; Fig. 2G). Translocation of calreticulin was measured in live Annexin V+7-AAD−/lo gated cells 120 hours after PF-08052667 treatment and demonstrated a significant increase in surface calreticulin comparable with that observed with SV and unconjugated MMAE (P < 0.005; Fig. 2H).

Bladder prewash enhances delivery of MMAE to bladder tissue in a rat model

PF-08052667 is designed for intravesical instillation into the bladder for delivery of MMAE to cells expressing IB6. Additionally, a mucosal barrier prewash with 0.1% DDM has been developed as a permeation enhancer to increase local exposure for other modalities, which we hypothesized would also apply to ADCs (40). The effects of the bladder prewash on MMAE concentration and penetration into bladder tissue were assessed with a rat cross-reactive surrogate ADC. Based on IHC, MMAE staining in the urinary bladder in animals with and without prewash was localized to the urothelium and into deeper submucosal and muscular layers (Fig. 3A). In animals treated with bladder prewash, MMAE staining intensity and frequency in urinary bladder tissues were more pronounced, with penetration in submucosal and muscular layers that persisted longer than in animals without prewash [Fig. 3A (top vs. bottom)]. In agreement with IHC findings, bladder prewash increased tissue concentrations of the total unconjugated MMAE up to 1 week after the dose (Fig. 3B). In addition, the effect of ADC bladder instillation dwell time on MMAE exposure was investigated in this model. Typical dwell times in patients vary from 1 to 2 hours, and dwell times ranging from 15 to 90 minutes in the rat studies resulted in no meaningful differences in the total unconjugated MMAE, but with consistently higher concentrations observed with bladder prewash compared with ADC alone, further confirming that 0.1% DDM prewash enhances the delivery of MMAE to bladder tissue (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Prewash increases the amount and permeation of MMAE into bladder tissue achieved by IB6-directed ADC. A, Bladder prewash prior to treatment resulted in greater MMAE tissue detection and depth of penetration following intravesical dosing of a rat IB6-specific PF-08052667 surrogate ADC at 1.2 mg/cm2 after 1, 6, 48, 120, or 168 hours after dose. Deeper penetration into submucosal and muscular layers persisted through 48 hours after dose with prewash and 1 hour after dose without prewash. B, Total unconjugated MMAE quantified by LC–MS/MS analysis confirmed increased bladder tissue drug levels with prewash as visualized by paired IHC samples. C, Prewash but not duration of dwell time increased bladder tissue concentrations of the total unconjugated MMAE when 0.8 mg/cm2 of ADC was administered for 15, 30, 60, or 90 minutes with or without prewash.

PF-08052667, with and without prewash, is well-tolerated with minimal systemic exposure and no systemic toxicity

The antibody component of PF-08052667 has comparable binding to cynomolgus and human IB6 orthologs (32), and thus GLP toxicity studies of the ADC, with and without prewash, were performed in this pharmacologically relevant intravesical model. Similar to the results in rats, the bladder prewash enhanced MMAE delivery in nonhuman primate bladder tissue. In the GLP study, the total unconjugated MMAE in the treated bladder tissue 1 week after the last dose was 42-fold higher with prewash than in animals treated with the same dose of PF-08052667 alone despite not affecting systemic exposure and being assessed a full week after the last dose (Fig. 4A). Importantly, plasma concentrations of the total antibody and total unconjugated drug were generally undetectable regardless of bladder prewash, with the estimated systemic absorption of <0.1% of the administered dose based on total antibody measurements (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Local and systemic exposure in PF-08052667-treated nonhuman primate (NHP). Intravesical instillation of PF-08052667 drives MMAE into bladder tissue and limits systemic exposure. A, In the pharmacologically relevant NHP intravesical model, bladder prewash prior to treatment resulted in 42-fold greater tissue exposure of the total unconjugated MMAE following intravesical dosing of PF-08052667, 1 week after the last dose. *, P = 0.0133 (unpaired t test). B, Plasma concentrations of the total antibody were generally undetectable regardless of the use of bladder prewash, with estimated systemic absorption <0.1% relative to intravenous dosing. Measurements below the limit of quantitation were assigned the lower limit of quantitation value. IVESIC, intravesical administration.

In concordance with the general lack of systemic exposure, there were no systemic PF-08052667-related toxicities observed. PF-08052667-related findings were limited to local effects on the lower urinary tract and were consistent with the local administration of MMAE and the presence of typical procedural trauma related to the route. Local findings were nonadverse but included minimal to mild vacuolation, inflammation, and edema of the urothelium, lamina propria, and/or bladder muscularis in animals treated with PF-08052667, with or without prewash. These findings were considered PF-08052667-related as they tended to increase in incidence/severity with increasing dose although the effects overlapped with those that occur secondarily from procedural trauma. Similarly, administration of bladder prewash demonstrated no effects distinguishable from procedural and/or background findings in local tissues or systemically when administered without PF-08052667. This result is consistent with the well-characterized safety profile of alkylsaccharide excipients, including n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM), which have been incorporated into multiple approved intranasal drug formulations as an inactive ingredient, with an established safety profile generally recognized as safe (41–43). The well-tolerated nature of PF-08052667, specifically designed for intravesical administration, is consistent with the route and low turnover rate of the urothelium, providing resistance to the effects of MMAE. This is in contrast to the systemic toxicities observed with intravenous administration, in which classical MMAE-related bone marrow toxicity and target-mediated findings occurred in rapidly dividing epithelial tissues.

PF-08052667 demonstrates robust antitumor activity in orthotopic mouse xenograft models after a bladder prewash

The impact of the mucosal barrier prewash, ADC dose, and instillation dwell time of PF-08052667 was further evaluated in CDX orthotopic bladder cancer models endogenously expressing or engineered to express human IB6 (SW780-RL+ and UMUC3-IB6+RL+, respectively). These tumor cells engraft and proliferate in the bladder mucosa, mimicking clinical NMIBC, and show differing IB6 expression levels and tumor growth kinetics (Fig. 5A). In the slow-growing SW780-RL+ model, vehicle control or single-agent PF-08052667 did not affect tumor growth compared with untreated tumors; however, 0.2 and 0.6 mg/cm2 of PF-08052667 with DDM prewash significantly reduced tumor burden (Fig. 5B; Supplementary Table S7; Supplementary Fig. S6). In this model, the 15-minute dwell time produced a similar antitumor response compared with the standard 60-minute incubation, indicating that shorter dosing periods may drive similar efficacy (Fig. 5C). These results were confirmed in a second, more aggressive model, UMUC3-IB6+RL+, in which both doses of PF-08052667 with DDM prewash significantly reduced tumor burden, and shorter dwell time did not affect activity (Fig. 5C; Supplementary Table S8). Additionally, single-agent PF-08052667 drove a significant survival benefit (22 vs. 48-day median) compared with vehicle control, which was further enhanced by the prewash (endpoint not reached). The improved durability of response to PF-08052667 with prewash resulted in 4/5 CRs compared with 0/5 CRs in the dose-matched single-agent group (Supplementary Fig. S7). Due to the technically challenging nature of intravesical dosing in mice, procedural complications caused a small number of mice to be excluded from the study (noted in Supplementary Table S8). PF-08052667 and DDM prewash were well tolerated, and body weight was not significantly affected while on treatment. These data demonstrate that intravesical administration of PF-08052667 with DDM prewash is effective in delivering MMAE to cancer cells engrafted in the urothelium, and this effect is maintained at shorter dwell times.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

PF-08052667 with prewash significantly enhances activity and survival benefit in IB6+ orthotopic models. Orthotopic models demonstrate consistent tumor control with PF-08052667 + prewash. A, IHC staining for IB6 in SW780 cells expressing red luciferase (left) and UM-UC-3 cells overexpressing IB6 and luciferase (right) implanted orthotopically in the bladders of female NSG and SCID mice, respectively. B, Mice bearing SW780-RL+ bladder tumors were treated with 0.1% DDM for 10 minutes immediately prior to PF-08052667 for 15 or 60 minutes (4 weekly doses) via intravesical administration. Bioluminescence signal was measured in the bladder region over time and plotted as geometric mean over time. C, AUC values are plotted to show the differences in tumor growth across treatments. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8), ****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

Discussion

After early-generation ADCs faced safety challenges due to narrow therapeutic windows, advances in technology, insights from reverse translation, and increased investment over the past 15 years have led to nearly 20 globally approved ADCs across multiple tumor types. These approved ADCs deliver microtubule inhibitors, DNA-damaging agents, or topoisomerase inhibitors via intravenous infusion, and although effective, their systemic exposure limits dose levels and frequencies and is associated with both target-dependent and independent off-tumor toxicities. Of this group, enfortumab vedotin, an MMAE-class vedotin-based ADC directed to Nectin-4, is of particular note due to its success in late-stage bladder cancer. Enfortumab vedotin has become the standard of care in advanced bladder cancer in combination with pembrolizumab and has delivered phase III clinical trial data supporting the combination’s use as the standard of care in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer and, more recently, as a potential standard of care in the perioperative treatment of patients with MIBC (9, 10). Early-stage bladder cancer, in which the tumor has yet to invade muscle tissue beyond the bladder lining, comprises 75% of all new bladder cancer cases, presenting a large opportunity to leverage bladder cancer sensitivity to MMAE for early treatment options. In this early line of treatment, intravesical administration managed by urologists is the standard-of-care treatment route, allowing local access to NMIBC tumor cells. By leveraging local administration with a clinically validated bladder cancer payload, we developed an MMAE-class ADC optimized for local delivery to NMIBC tumors via intravesical administration.

Enabled by local administration, PF-08052667 was designed to increase potency over existing MMAE-class ADCs through multiple improvements over approved ADC counterparts, including enfortumab vedotin. PF-08052667 is an IB6-directed ADC with an average of 8 MMAE molecules attached as its payload, which is double the payload in approved MMAE-class vedotin ADCs. IB6 is highly and consistently expressed on the surface of NMIBC tumor cells and normal epithelium, unlocking additional antitumor activity via the multifaceted MOA of MMAE to drive direct cytotoxicity, with potential secondary activity via MMAE-specific secondary effects of bystander cytotoxicity and ICD (27, 28) of NMIBC tumor cells. PF-08052667 is readily internalized, as demonstrated by in vitro data in which most of the ADC was internalized in 4 hours. This is a marked increase compared with Nectin-4-bound antibodies, which have been shown to internalize more slowly, with about 60% internalization at 24 hours (44). In addition, PF-08052667 incorporates a PEGgluc linker, which has been demonstrated to improve both cellular retention and potency (24). Together, the expedited internalization combined with enhanced MMAE retention may allow for more drug delivery to the bladder tissue after intravesical instillation.

In addition to potency-driving ADC design, PF-08052667 is intended to be delivered directly to the bladder lumen of patients with early-stage bladder cancer, in which local tissue exposure will be further enhanced by a bladder prewash with 0.1% DDM. The use of alkylsaccharide excipients such as DDM for removing mucosal barriers has been established for more than 2 decades. These compounds are generally recognized as safe and have been utilized for other dose routes (e.g., intranasal) and modalities (e.g., viral particle uptake; refs. 41–43). In this study, we demonstrate that the increased potency of the DAR8 cytotoxic IB6-directed ADC PF-08052667, paired with enhanced tissue exposure and deeper penetration enabled by the prewash, is effective. DDM has been utilized to disrupt the mucosal coating of the urothelium and increase the permeability of tight junctions. By washing the bladder prior to ADC administration, we enable more effective delivery of MMAE into the bladder tissue while retaining safety through minimal systemic exposure. This is increasingly important in the context of intravesical administration, in which the majority of the delivered drug is only held within the bladder for a limited time (60–120 minutes). The limited local toxicity, despite this increased bladder tissue target expression and exposure, reflects the importance of selecting an MMAE payload and local delivery. Despite the high IB6 expression, the comparably mitotically quiescent normal urothelium, as opposed to rapidly dividing tumor cells, confers an additional layer of safety inherent to the design of PF-08052667, enabling targeting of IB6 in a highly expressed tissue while avoiding normal tissue toxicity typical of systemically administered ADCs on rapidly dividing tissues such as the skin and GI mucosa (45). The data presented further show that when combined with prewash, intravesical delivery of PF-08052667 for a shorter dwell time of 15 minutes results in no difference in bladder tissue concentration of MMAE nor efficacy in tumor models compared with standard 1+ hour dwell times that are asked of patients in the clinic. Importantly, the incorporation of the prewash did not alter the safety profile or systemic exposure of PF-08052667, ensuring the design characteristics of a highly potent ADC remain localized to preserve safety and enable maximum antitumor activity. In totality, these data show not only that PF-08052667 presents a novel and potentially efficacious therapy but also that the combination with a prewash provides further potential enhancements to improve patient experience while maintaining activity.

Although PF-08052667 demonstrates potent monotherapy activity, MMAE-based vedotin ADCs, in addition to enfortumab vedotin, have shown clinical promise in combination with anti–PD-1 CPIs (9, 46, 47), hypothesized to be due to MMAE-induced ICD (27, 28). PF-08052667 generates comparable hallmarks of ICD to vedotin ADCs in vitro, indicating that MMAE delivered by PF-08052667 may recruit and activate antigen-presenting cells that, in turn, prime T cells to recognize and eliminate additional tumor cells. This supports the potential for this immune effect to be amplified by a combination with checkpoint inhibition, positioning PF-08052667 to partner with CPIs to induce robust and durable antitumor activity in the MMAE-sensitive bladder cancer indication.

The current landscape of development in NMIBC therapy is highly competitive, with multiple modalities showing promise to potentially replace or combine with BCG as the standard of care. These include recently approved options for BCG-unresponsive patients, such as nadofaragene firaenovec (an adenovirus-based IFNA2B gene therapy), a gemcitabine intravesical delayed-release system, and intravenous pembrolizumab (48), with clinical trials featuring multiple CPIs by systemic administration in combination with BCG in high-risk BCG-naïve patients, including sasanlimab (49) and durvalumab (50). These approaches harness extended delivery of traditional chemotherapies, incorporate methods to increase immune activation in an untargeted fashion, or are given in combination with BCG, which continues to face supply issues. The design elements and delivery protocols for PF-08052667 were created to enhance MMAE tissue concentration while retaining safety and inducing direct tumor cell death capable of instigating a prolonged antitumor immune response in a targeted fashion. Given the demonstrated success of MMAE combined with checkpoint inhibition in later-stage bladder cancer, there is a strong opportunity to address a significant unmet need in the underserved patient population with NMIBC with a similar mechanism. In addition, we hypothesize that similar improvements in ADC uptake, delivery, and safety could be realized with coadministered intravesical combination partners such as CPIs, although additional research is needed. Based on this unmet need, together with these preclinical findings, a phase I trial of PF-08052667 with bladder prewash has been initiated in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC (NCT07206225).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1

Structure of PF-08052667

Supplementary Figure 2

Representative analytical results for PF-0805266

Supplementary Figure 3

Saturation binding analysis of h2A2 antibody and PF-08052667 on UMUC3 parental and engineered cell lines

Supplementary Figure 4

Intracellular trafficking and localization of PF-08052667

Supplementary Figure 5

1B6 expression and efficacy on patient-derived organoids (PDOs)

Supplementary Figure 6

SW780 mouse model plots of individual mice

Supplementary Figure 7

UMUC3-1B6+RL+ mouse model plots of individual mice and CR rates

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the researchers at Pfizer for providing their expertise and assistance in these studies and the team at HUB Organoids for their collaboration and scientific discussion related to patient-derived organoids. We are deeply thankful to Liem Nguyen, whose foundational work and antibody expertise during the early stages of this project were invaluable, and to Greg Stacey, whose efforts to complete required article compliance have been vital. The experiments described in this article were funded by Pfizer, Inc. All work was funded by the sponsor, Pfizer Oncology, Inc.

Footnotes

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

Contributor Information

Christopher M. Carosino, Email: chris.carosino@pfizer.com.

Joseph D. Dekker, Email: joe.dekker@pfizer.com.

Data Availability

Raw data for this study were generated at Pfizer, Inc. (Bothell, Washington), Reaction Biology (Hershey, Pennsylvania), HUB Organoids (The Netherlands), or Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). The proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (51) partner repository with accession number PDX077120. RNA-seq data are accessible via the NCBI’s GEO repository under accession number GSE328112. Data generated in this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Data files or from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Authors’ Disclosures

C.M. Carosino, D.J. Olson, M.R. Levengood, S. Sandall, and J.D. Dekker report a patent pending for PC073292-PRV2 pending and employment with Pfizer, Inc. I. Mikell reports personal fees and other support from Pfizer, Inc. outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.

Authors’ Contributions

C.M. Carosino: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–original draft, project administration, writing–review and editing. D.J. Olson: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. R.C. Mazahreh: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. D.J. Ortiz: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. S. Duniho: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. E. Moskovitz: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. M. Gray: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. R.F. Hein: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. N.H. Garcia: Data curation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. H. Ardalani: Data curation, formal analysis, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. L. Farr: Data curation, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. T. Yan: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. M. Burcher: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–review and editing. I. Mikell: Data curation, visualization, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. M.R. Levengood: Conceptualization, data curation, supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. S. Sandall: Conceptualization, data curation, supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. J.D. Dekker: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing–original draft, project administration, writing–review and editing.

Ethics Statement

All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee or through an ethical review process.

References

  • 1. Giridhar KV, Kohli M. Management of muscle-invasive urothelial cancer and the emerging role of immunotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:1564–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol 2016;196:1021–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li R, Sundi D, Zhang J, Kim Y, Sylvester RJ, Spiess PE, et al. Systematic review of the therapeutic efficacy of bladder-preserving treatments for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer following intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Eur Urol 2020;78:387–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Veeratterapillay R, Heer R, Johnson MI, Persad R, Bach C. High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer-therapy options during intravesical BCG shortage. Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ripoll J, Ramos M, Montaño J, Pons J, Ameijide A, Franch P. Cancer-specific survival by stage of bladder cancer and factors collected by Mallorca Cancer Registry associated to survival. BMC Cancer 2021;21:676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Musat MG, Kwon CS, Masters E, Sikirica S, Pijush DB, Forsythe A. Treatment outcomes of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) in real-world evidence (RWE) studies: systematic literature review (SLR). Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022;14:35–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wallerand H, Bernhard JC, Culine S, Ballanger P, Robert G, Reiter RE, et al. Targeted therapies in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer according to the signaling pathways. Urol Oncol 2011;29:4–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Powles T, Van der Heijden M, Loriot Y, Bedke J, Valderrama BP, Iyer G, et al. EV-302: updated analysis from the phase 3 global study of enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab (EV + P) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). J Clin Oncol 2025;43(5_suppl):664. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vulsteke C, Kaimakliotis H, Danchaivijitr P, Sabadash MY, Rodriguez-Vida A, Zhang Z, et al. LBA2 Perioperative (periop) enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in participants (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are cisplatin-ineligible: the phase III KEYNOTE-905 study. Ann Oncol 2025;36:S1763. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bandyopadhyay A, Raghavan S. Defining the role of integrin αvβ6 in cancer. Curr Drug Targets 2009;10:645–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brzozowska E, Deshmukh S. Integrin alpha v beta 6 (αvβ6) and its implications in cancer treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:12346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh DA. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:9–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Goodman SL, Picard M. Integrins as therapeutic targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2012;33:405–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hamidi H, Ivaska J. Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18:533–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nemeth JA, Nakada MT, Trikha M, Lang Z, Gordon MS, Jayson GC, et al. Alpha-v integrins as therapeutic targets in oncology. Cancer Invest 2007;25:632–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Takada Y, Ye X, Simon S. The integrins. Genome Biol 2007;8:215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. van der Flier A, Sonnenberg A. Function and interactions of integrins. Cell Tissue Res 2001;305:285–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bengs S, Becker E, Busenhart P, Spalinger MR, Raselli T, Kasper S, et al. β6 -integrin serves as a novel serum tumor marker for colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2019;145:678–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Elayadi AN, Samli KN, Prudkin L, Liu YH, Bian A, Xie XJ, et al. A peptide selected by biopanning identifies the integrin alphavbeta6 as a prognostic biomarker for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:5889–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Élez E, Kocáková I, Höhler T, Martens UM, Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, et al. Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial. Ann Oncol 2015;26:132–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hazelbag S, Kenter GG, Gorter A, Dreef EJ, Koopman LA, Violette SM, et al. Overexpression of the alpha v beta 6 integrin in cervical squamous cell carcinoma is a prognostic factor for decreased survival. J Pathol 2007;212:316–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang ZY, Xu KS, Wang JS, Yang GY, Wang W, Wang JY, et al. Integrin alphanvbeta6 acts as a prognostic indicator in gastric carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2008;20:61–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mazahreh R, Mason ML, Gosink JJ, Olson DJ, Thurman R, Hale C, et al. SGN-CD228A is an investigational CD228-directed antibody-drug conjugate with potent antitumor activity across a wide spectrum of preclinical solid tumor models. Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22:421–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rieder CL, Maiato H. Stuck in division or passing through: what happens when cells cannot satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint. Dev Cell 2004;7:637–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Staudacher AH, Brown MP. Antibody drug conjugates and bystander killing: is antigen-dependent internalisation required? Br J Cancer 2017;117:1736–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gray E, Ulrich M, Epp A, Younan P, Sahetya D, Hensley K, et al. SGN-B7H4V, an investigational vedotin ADC directed to the immune checkpoint ligand B7-H4, shows promising activity in preclinical models. J Immunother Cancer 2023;11:e007572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Heiser RA, Cao AT, Zeng W, Ulrich M, Younan P, Anderson ME, et al. Brentuximab vedotin-driven microtubule disruption results in endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to immunogenic cell death and antitumor immunity. Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23:68–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Olson D, Chia YL, Iboi E, Farr L, Burcher M, Lee A, et al. Abstract LB246: enfortumab vedotin, a nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrates compelling antitumor activity in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer models which predicts minimal systemic exposure when administered by intravesical instillation in patients. Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Supplement):LB246. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kamat AM, Frankel P. Rethinking the path to bladder cancer staging: can magnetic resonance imaging speed up time to receipt of therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer? J Clin Oncol 2025;43:1401–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lyon RP, Bovee TD, Doronina SO, Burke PJ, Hunter JH, Neff-LaFord HD, et al. Reducing hydrophobicity of homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates improves pharmacokinetics and therapeutic index. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:733–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lyon RP, Jonas M, Frantz C, Trueblood ES, Yumul R, Westendorf L, et al. SGN-B6A: a new vedotin antibody–drug conjugate directed to integrin beta-6 for multiple carcinoma indications. Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22:1444–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hafner M, Niepel M, Chung M, Sorger PK. Growth rate inhibition metrics correct for confounders in measuring sensitivity to cancer drugs. Nat Methods 2016;13:521–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) . Estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers. Rockville (MD): FDA; 2005. In press. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Guo S, Jiang X, Mao B, Li Q-X. The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development. BMC Cancer 2019;19:718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Albert F, Antoniewicz A, Grantzow T, Fingerle-Rowson G, Ruf P, Lindhofer H, et al. Intravesical therapy with the trifunctional anti-EpCAM/CD3 bsAb Catumaxomab is well tolerated and shows encouraging preliminary efficacy in patients with high-risk NMIBC (CATUNIBLA phase I trial). J Clin Oncol 2022;40(16_suppl):e16555. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Shih CH, Lin YH, Luo HL, Sung WW. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting HER2 for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma: potential therapies for HER2-positive urothelial carcinoma. Front Pharmacol 2024;15:1326296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wong JL, Rosenberg JE. Targeting nectin-4 by antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021;21:863–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Warren S, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, Martinez AB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ramesh N, Memarzadeh B, Ge Y, Frey D, VanRoey M, Rojas V, et al. Identification of pretreatment agents to enhance adenovirus infection of bladder epithelium. Mol Ther 2004;10:697–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Madden S, Carrazana E, Rabinowicz AL. Optimizing absorption for intranasal delivery of drugs targeting the central nervous system using alkylsaccharide permeation enhancers. Pharmaceutics 2023;15:2119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rabinowicz AL, Carrazana E, Maggio ET. Improvement of intranasal drug delivery with Intravail® alkylsaccharide excipient as a mucosal absorption enhancer aiding in the treatment of conditions of the central nervous system. Drugs R D 2021;21:361–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Spack EG, Wehner NG, Winkelhake JL. Preclinical and pharmacological studies of AG284, a soluble HLA-DR2:myelin basic protein peptide complex for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. CNS Drug Rev 1998;4:225–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. M-Rabet M, Cabaud O, Josselin E, Finetti P, Castellano R, Farina A, et al. Nectin-4: a new prognostic biomarker for efficient therapeutic targeting of primary and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2017;28:769–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Siegel F, Torelli A, Mattis M, Debatin J, Erben P, Gumbel M. Proliferation and regeneration of the healthy human urothelium: a multi-scale simulation approach with 16 hypotheses of cell differentiation. PLoS One 2025;20:e0325132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sehgal K, Jaime JC, Powell SF, Perez CA, Fontana E, Kingsley E, et al. Sigvotatug vedotin (SV), an investigational integrin beta-6 (IB6)–directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), and pembrolizumab combination therapy: initial results from an ongoing phase 1 study (SGNB6A-001). J Clin Oncol 2025;43(16_suppl):3010. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wei Y, Zhang R, Yu C, Hong Z, Lin L, Li T, et al. Disitamab vedotin in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally and locally advanced bladder urothelial carcinoma: a two-center’s real-world study. Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1230395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Balar AV, Kamat AM, Kulkarni GS, Uchio EM, Boormans JL, Roumiguié M, et al. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:919–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shore ND, Powles TB, Bedke J, Galsky MD, Palou Redorta J, Ku JH, et al. Sasanlimab plus BCG in BCG-naive, high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: the randomized phase 3 CREST trial. Nat Med 2025;31:2806–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. De Santis M, Palou Redorta J, Nishiyama H, Krawczyński M, Seyitkuliev A, Novikov A, et al. Durvalumab in combination with BCG for BCG-naive, high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (POTOMAC): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2025;406:2221–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Perez-Riverol Y, Bandla C, Kundu DJ, Kamatchinathan S, Bai J, Hewapathirana S, et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2025;53:D543–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Structure of PF-08052667

Supplementary Figure 2

Representative analytical results for PF-0805266

Supplementary Figure 3

Saturation binding analysis of h2A2 antibody and PF-08052667 on UMUC3 parental and engineered cell lines

Supplementary Figure 4

Intracellular trafficking and localization of PF-08052667

Supplementary Figure 5

1B6 expression and efficacy on patient-derived organoids (PDOs)

Supplementary Figure 6

SW780 mouse model plots of individual mice

Supplementary Figure 7

UMUC3-1B6+RL+ mouse model plots of individual mice and CR rates

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables

Data Availability Statement

Raw data for this study were generated at Pfizer, Inc. (Bothell, Washington), Reaction Biology (Hershey, Pennsylvania), HUB Organoids (The Netherlands), or Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). The proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (51) partner repository with accession number PDX077120. RNA-seq data are accessible via the NCBI’s GEO repository under accession number GSE328112. Data generated in this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Data files or from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of American Association for Cancer Research

RESOURCES