Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;12(1):401–429. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00611-x

Table 7.

Visual acuity at last observation in REFLECT

Treated (REFLECT) Natural history (N = 408 eyes)
Bilaterally treated (N = 96 eyes) Unilaterally treated (N = 100 eyes)
Visual acuity (logMAR)
 Median 1.40 1.40 1.70
 Mean (SD) 1.32 (0.54) 1.45 (0.60) 1.68 (0.61)
 95% CI (mean) [1.21; 1.43] [1.33; 1.57] [1.62; 1.74]
 P values versus NH (KW/ANCOVAa) < 0.01/< 0.01 < 0.01/< 0.01 –
 Mean difference versus NH [95% CI]a − 0.355 [− 0.488; − 0.222] − 0.228 [− 0.361; − 0.095] –
Response rate (logMAR ≤ 1.6)
 n (%) [95% CI] 76 (79.2%) [69.7; 86.8] 67 (67.0%) [56.9; 76.1] 181 (44.4%) [39.5; 49.3]
 P values versus NH (C/GLMMb) < 0.01/< 0.01 < 0.01/< 0.01 –

ANCOVA analysis of covariance, C chi-squared test, CI confidence interval, GLMM generalized linear mixed model, KW Kruskal–Wallis, logMAR logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, LS least squares, NH natural history, SD standard deviation

aMixed-model ANCOVA with repeated measures taking into account the inter-eye correlation of each patient

bGLMM with repeated measures taking into account the inter-eye correlation of each patient