Table 3.
Associations between social status indicators and service use outcomes in the treatment phase
| Treatment phase outcome variables2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disengaged | Referred elsewhere | |||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | RRR (95% CI) | |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| White | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Asian | 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) * | 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) | 0.97 (0.79, 1.18) | 1.53 (1.25, 1.86) *** | 1.31 (1.07, 1.61) * | 1.46 (1.06, 1.99) * |
| Black | 1.30 (1.08, 1.55) ** | 1.22 (1.02, 1.47) * | 1.11 (0.91, 1.35) | 0.78 (0.53, 1.14) | 0.73 (0.49, 1.07) | 0.69 (0.45, 1.04) |
| Mixed | 1.22 (0.93, 1.60) | 1.04 (0.79, 1.37) | 0.96 (0.72, 1.29) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.18) | 1.30 (0.82, 2.05) | 1.26 (0.77, 2.07) |
| Other | 1.42 (0.97, 2.08) | 1.28 (0.87, 1.88) | 1.11 (0.72, 1.72) | 1.53 (0.81, 2.87) | 1.32 (0.70, 2.50) | 1.04 (0.47, 2.27) |
| Sexuality | ||||||
| Heterosexual | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| LGB | 0.86 (0.62, 1.19) | 0.70 (0.50, 0.97) * | 0.75 (0.53, 1.06) | 1.26 (0.77, 2.08) | 1.13 (0.68, 1.88) | 1.16 (0.67, 1.99) |
| Religion | ||||||
| No religion | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Christian | 0.90 (0.80, 1.02) | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) | 1.01 (0.88, 1.16) | 0.90 (0.72, 1.13) | 0.92 (0.73, 1.17) | 0.95 (0.74, 1.21) |
| Muslim | 1.31 (1.13, 1.52) *** | 1.23 (1.06, 1.44) ** | 1.31 (1.05, 1.62) * | 1.22 (0.93, 1.59) | 1.04 (0.79, 1.36) | 0.77 (0.53, 1.12) |
| Other | 0.76 (0.64, 0.90) ** | 0.84 (0.70, 0.99) * | 0.93 (0.75, 1.15) | 1.38 (1.07, 1.79) * | 1.37 (1.05, 1.78) * | 1.11 (0.79, 1.55) |
| Employment | ||||||
| Employed | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Unemployed | 1.56 (1.40, 1.74) *** | 1.36 (1.21, 1.53) *** | 1.29 (1.14, 1.46) *** | 2.59 (2.16, 3.10) *** | 2.09 (1.73, 2.53) *** | 2.24 (1.84, 2.75) *** |
| IMD | ||||||
| 1 (Most deprived) | 2.33 (1.65, 3.28) *** | 2.17 (1.53, 3.09) *** | 1.84 (1.27, 2.66) ** | 1.43 (0.80, 2.53) | 1.32 (0.73, 2.36) | 0.97 (0.53, 1.76) |
| 2 | 1.28 (0.88, 1.87) | 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) | 1.06 (0.71, 1.59) | 1.60 (0.87, 2.94) | 1.57 (0.85, 2.90) | 1.33 (0.71, 2.50) |
| 3 | 1.49 (1.05, 2.13) * | 1.41 (0.99, 2.03) | 1.26 (0.86, 1.83) | 1.39 (0.78, 2.49) | 1.29 (0.71, 2.32) | 0.96 (0.52, 1.75) |
| 4 | 1.87 (1.32, 2.64) *** | 1.72 (1.21, 2.44) ** | 1.47 (1.02, 2.12)* | 1.37 (0.78, 2.44) | 1.23 (0.69, 2.20) | 0.91 (0.51, 1.65) |
| 5 (Least deprived) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
2Reference group ‘completed treatment’ for both outcomes. Results based upon analysis of reduced sample (n = 6852) because men from the ‘assessment only group’ were removed. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Model 1 unadjusted, model 2 adjusted for age, diagnosis and baseline symptom severity scores, model 3 adjusted for age, diagnosis, baseline severity scores and all other social status indicators