Abstract
Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are key participants in both early and late-stage atherosclerosis. VSMCs invade the early atherosclerotic lesion from the media, expanding lesions, but also forming a protective fibrous cap rich in extracellular matrix to cover the ‘necrotic’ core. Hence, VSMCs have been viewed as plaque-stabilizing, and decreased VSMC plaque content—often measured by expression of contractile markers—associated with increased plaque vulnerability. However, the emergence of lineage-tracing and transcriptomic studies has demonstrated that VSMCs comprise a much larger proportion of atherosclerotic plaques than originally thought, demonstrate multiple different phenotypes in vivo, and have roles that might be detrimental. VSMCs down-regulate contractile markers during atherosclerosis whilst adopting alternative phenotypes, including macrophage-like, foam cell-like, osteochondrogenic-like, myofibroblast-like, and mesenchymal stem cell-like. VSMC phenotypic switching can be studied in tissue culture, but also now in the media, fibrous cap and deep-core region, and markedly affects plaque formation and markers of stability. In this review, we describe the different VSMC plaque phenotypes and their presumed cellular and paracrine functions, the regulatory mechanisms that control VSMC plasticity, and their impact on atherogenesis and plaque stability.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Vascular smooth muscle
1. Introduction
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by formation of lipid-laden plaques in the arterial wall. Plaques can narrow the blood vessel (stenosis) or obstruct blood flow by thrombi forming upon plaque rupture or erosion, leading to myocardial infarction.1 Despite major therapeutic advances and primary prevention, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide.2 Besides their lipid content, atherosclerotic plaques comprise different cell types including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and inflammatory cells (e.g. macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes), extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and cellular debris that accumulates in the deep cholesterol-rich ‘necrotic’ core.1
An unstable and rupture-prone plaque is defined by a collagen-poor thin fibrous cap infiltrated by macrophages and lymphocytes with rare or no VSMCs and a relatively large underlying necrotic core.1 This definition implies that macrophages are over-represented in unstable plaques relative to VSMCs and are considered detrimental for plaque stability, whereas VSMCs are regarded as plaque-stabilizing. However, more recent studies using rigorous lineage-tracing systems have indicated that this concept may be an oversimplification, and that VSMCs comprise a much greater proportion of plaque cells than previously thought. In particular, VSMCs lose their own lineage markers and adopt macrophage and other markers, making studies based entirely on identification of static markers unreliable. In contrast to ruptured plaques, lesions with superficial plaque erosion contain few macrophages but abundant VSMCs and ECM (e.g. hyaluronan) without disruption of the fibrous cap.3 VSMCs from eroded plaques show reduced expression of VSMC differentiation markers4 yet their true role and phenotype during plaque erosion is still unclear and requires further investigation. Following recent new insights in the dynamic phenotype of VSMCs in atherosclerosis, we believe it is time for a re-assessment of the complex role of VSMCs in atherogenesis and plaque stability. In particular, VSMCs are able to populate both the fibrous cap and plaque core, and have different effects on atherogenesis by adopting different cellular phenotypes. In this review, we discuss the distinct phenotypes that VSMCs acquire in the atherosclerotic milieu, the mechanisms that govern these phenotypic switches, their secretory and paracrine functions, and their pathological impact on atherosclerosis.
2. Identification of plaque VSMCs
VSMCs are the major component of the vessel wall responsible for maintaining vascular tone and regulating blood pressure via their contractile properties.5 The ultrastructural characteristics of medial VSMCs have been carefully studied in the early 1970s, revealing remarkable cell plasticity, which still remains valid today. In normal healthy arteries, VSMCs have a spindle-like shape, are densely packed with microfilaments and express a range of proteins [e.g. smooth muscle alpha actin 2 (ACTA2), transgelin (TAGLN), and myosin heavy chain 11 (MYH11)] required for their contractile function.5–7 Upon vascular injury8 or atherosclerosis development,9 contractile marker gene expression is down-regulated in VSMCs in part through activation of a G/C repressor element in contractile gene promoters.10 Until recently, identification of VSMCs within lesions largely relied on the detection of contractile markers, usually by means of immunohistochemistry, meaning that cells of VSMC origin that lack these markers were not identified.
Recent advances in genetically engineered mouse models have allowed us to label and track VSMCs with more fidelity in different disease models including atherosclerosis, even when VSMC characteristics and contractile protein markers are lost. A common example comprises a mouse containing a tracking marker (usually a fluorescent reporter transgene), crossed with a mouse containing the promoter of a VSMC-specific contractile gene (e.g. Myh11) linked to a drug-inducible (e.g. tamoxifen) recombinase system. Drug-induced recombination permanently marks all VSMCs and their progeny, allowing tracking of cells of VSMC origin even when MYH11 expression is lost. Studies using these models have shown that >80% of VSMC-derived cells in mouse plaques are negative for ACTA2,11 demonstrating that immunohistochemistry for ACTA2 alone is not adequate to quantify mouse plaque VSMCs. Similarly, the majority of plaque cells in human coronary lesions identified as being of VSMC origin based on a VSMC-specific epigenetic signature fail to express ACTA2 and MYH11.12 Moreover, although most ACTA2+ cells can be found in the fibrous cap, VSMC-derived ACTA2− cells accumulate in the plaque core,13 disputing the view that the core is predominantly occupied by macrophages. Not only have we underestimated the VSMC content of plaques, we likely have also misidentified VSMCs as macrophages. For example, both in vitro experiments and (electron) microscopic analysis of human plaques have shown that VSMCs can transform into foam cells upon cholesterol loading,14–16 thereby expressing the scavenger receptor CD68,16 a widely used marker to identify macrophages, and multiple studies reveal that ∼40% of CD68+ cells in human and mouse plaques are of VSMC and not myeloid origin.11,16 Indeed, VSMCs have been shown to adopt a macrophage-like phenotype and express multiple markers of macrophages, such as CD11b and galectin-3 (LGALS3).16–18 The major advantage of these lineage-tracing models is that they allow us to study both VSMC origin and fate, including the ability to switch to different phenotypes (Figure 1), thereby re-assessing and improving our understanding of their role in atherosclerosis (Figure 2).
Figure 1.
Regulation and characterisation of VSMC phenotypic switching. In the healthy vessel wall, VSMCs exhibit a contractile phenotype characterized by expression of contractile proteins (ACTA2, TAGLN, and MYH11) regulated by MYOCD, which is negatively regulated by NFκB, FOXO3A, miRNA221/222, miRNA21, and miRNA124. Upon injury or atherosclerosis, VSMCs switch to a synthetic phenotype mediated via PDGF-BB and Klf4, which is inhibited by miRNA143/145 and TGFβ. Synthetic VSMCs are characterised by increased secretion of ECM, MMPs, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and exosomes. Exosomes can trigger neighbouring VSMCs to transdifferentiate into osteochondrogenic VSMCs characterised by RUNX2, SOX9, osteopontin expression, release of calcium deposits, and calcifying vesicles. Osteochondrocyte-like VSMCs secrete calcifying vesicles that further propagate calcification. In some cases, calcifying VSMCs originate from medial contractile VSMCs in response to high concentrations of calcium and phosphate, β-catenin/Wnt signalling, KLF4, or miRNA221/222. Exposure to agLDL or oxLDL triggers a switch to macrophage-like VSMCs or foam cells characterised by CD68, CD36, LGALS3, CD11b, and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, which is inhibited by integrin β3, apolipoprotein A1, or HDL. VSMCs may adopt adipocyte-like features in a corticosteroid/insulin-rich milieu characterised by expression of adipsin, leptin, and PPARγ pathway activation. KLF4 promotes phenotypic modulation into macrophage-like and Sca1-expressing mesenchymal-like VSMCs, while MSCs differentiate into VSMCs in vitro when exposed to TGFβ and PDGF-BB. VSMCs might also derive from ECs following EndMT driven by TGFβ signalling. VSMCs can potentially transdifferentiate into endothelial-like cells characterised by CD31 expression and angiogenic features in response to shear stress or via a KLF4-dependent stem cell state. TCF21 and OCT4 promote phenotypic modulation into an athero-protective ‘myofibroblast’-like VSMC characterised by fibronectin, collagen 1 alpha 1, and proteoglycans production. Phenotypically switched VSMCs conserve an epigenetic H3K4me2 signature of their former contractile state that can be used as a VSMC-specific marker. MYOCD, myocardin; NFκB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; FOXO3a, forkhead box O3a; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; ECM, extracellular matrix; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; RUNX2, runt-related transcription factor 2; SOX9, SRY-related HMG-box 9; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma; Sca1, stem cell antigen 1; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; EndMT, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition; TCF21, transcription factor 21; OCT4, octamer binding transcription factor 4.
Figure 2.
The role of VSMCs in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Schematic of all VSMCs phenotypes found in mouse and/or human atherosclerotic plaques to date including their location within the lesion, although their presence and/or abundance may vary depending on the lesion stage. The medial layer is composed of different VSMC clones (illustrated as red, blue, purple, and green) exhibiting a contractile phenotype. During atherogenesis, medial VSMCs underlying the lesion lose their contractile markers and undergo phenotypic switching, likely upon exposure to lipids or calcification-promoting molecules. Only one or a small number of phenotypically modulated medial VSMC clones (here in red) invade and occupy the lesion. The mechanism for oligoclonal expansion is still unclear but may involve a subpopulation of Sca1+ VSMCs that are predisposed to invade the lesion or express Sca1 during clonal expansion. Within the lesion, these modulated VSMCs adopt various phenotypes: synthetic, macrophage-like, foam cells, MSC-like, osteochondrogenic, myofibroblast-like/fibromyocyte and potentially adipocyte-like, and EC-like VSMCs. Synthetic and myofibroblast-like/fibromyocyte VSMC clones occupy the fibrous cap and produce ECM. Macrophage-like and foam cell-like VSMCs possess requisite markers but still differ from professional monocytes that enter the lesion via the circulation. In response to various cues, VSMC undergoes apoptosis characterised by formation of apoptotic bodies and/or undergo (secondary) necrosis and accumulate in the cholesterol-rich ‘necrotic’ core. Osteochondrogenic VSMCs promote micro- and macro-calcification that accumulate in the fibrous cap and necrotic core, respectively. Calcifying and synthetic VSMCs secrete EVs or exosomes carrying various cargos (e.g. nucleic acids and bioactive molecules) that are released into the circulation upon plaque rupture and can potentially be used as CVD biomarkers. Sca1, stem cell antigen 1; ECM, extracellular matrix.
3. Origin of plaque VSMCs
3.1 Embryonic origin
Lineage-tracing studies have unambiguously demonstrated that VSMCs in the arterial wall originate from multiple progenitors from different embryonic origin, creating a mosaic with a segmental architecture of the thoracic artery.19,20 VSMCs from the ascending aorta, aortic arch and carotid arteries derive from the neural crest, while the descending aorta predominantly originates from somitic precursors. The secondary heart field contributes to the development of the proximal aortic sinus overlapping neural crest-derived VSMCs, but the coronary arteries are formed by the epicardium.20
3.2 Local media-derived VSMCs
Wisler proposed in 1968 that VSMCs invade the arterial intima in humans and experimental animals by migration and proliferation from the arterial media.21 Although human arteries also contain intimal VSMCs, the conventional view has been that VSMCs in human atherosclerotic plaques also derive from local medial VSMCs that de-differentiate when invading the intima.22 VSMC migration into the intima is hard (but not impossible) to measure directly, and a number of kinetic studies identified a pool of migrating VSMCs, some of which do not proliferate in rodent models of neointima formation.23 However, the introduction of rigorous lineage-tracing models have provided solid evidence that VSMCs undergo phenotypic switching during atherosclerosis, originate almost exclusively from the local arterial wall, and comprise up to 30–70% of all plaque cells.11,13,17 These studies also refuted previous ideas that VSMCs originate predominantly from the bone marrow, and all circulating cell types have now been excluded as primary sources of plaque VSMCs.24 Although bone marrow-derived cells can still express ACTA2 and other VSMC markers both in vitro and in vivo,18 they may not behave like vessel wall-derived VSMCs.25
A long-standing and important concept in atherosclerosis has been that VSMCs are derived from a small patch or clone that expands in the intima, such that plaque VSMCs are monoclonal or oligoclonal. VSMC clonality has been demonstrated in human atherosclerotic plaques using biochemical and molecular analyses.26 More recently, VSMC lineage studies using multicolour reporters have confirmed that mouse plaque VSMCs are also oligoclonal,13,19,27 indicating that from a mixed population of medial VSMCs only a few VSMC clones give rise to the whole VSMC population in the plaque. These few VSMCs populate the fibrous cap, but are highly proliferative and also invade the plaque core.19 The mechanisms that drive clonal VSMC expansion are under study, and include a number of possibilities, including: (i) cell-autonomous properties, where the cell is ‘primed’ or ‘selected’ to invade the lesion, (ii) a stochastic event, where the cell is located at the ‘right time, right place’ to break through the fragmented elastic lamina, (iii) competition, where certain clones prevent other VSMCs participating, (iv) selective disadvantage due to VSMC senescence (see Section 5.1.3), apoptosis (see Section 5.3.1), or efferocytosis, and (v) presence of a ‘progenitor’ cell type in the media ready to respond.
3.3 Mesenchymal stem cell and endothelial cell-derived VSMCs
Although it is now generally accepted that local medial VSMCs provide the major contribution of VSMCs to neointima formation upon vessel injury,8 several studies suggest that other sources within the vessel wall also contribute, including adventitial mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs),28 pericytes29 and fibroblasts,30 or endothelial cells (ECs).31,32 For example, adventitial cells expressing MSC markers, such as stem cell activating antigen 1 (Sca1) can differentiate into VSMCs expressing SMC promoter-driven reporter genes and contractile markers in vitro and in vein grafts,28 Glioma associated oncogene 1+ adventitial MSCs generate ACTA2+ cells that migrate and proliferate in atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE−/−mice,33 the adventitia and media of ApoE−/−mice contain a subpopulation of cells expressing the coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated transcription factor 21 (TCF21) and give rise to ACTA2+ and TAGLN+ cells in the fibrous cap,34 and a subset of medial MYH11+ VSMCs expressing Sca1 undergo phenotypic switching in mouse plaques.35 The Sca1+ VSMC population increases upon vascular injury and their transcriptional profile is similar to the synthetic plaque Sca1+ VSMC lineage. These Sca1+ medial VSMCs may be predisposed to proliferate and give rise to phenotypically distinct cells within plaques (Figure 2), but whether this Sca1+ population truly controls clonal VSMC expansion remains to be determined. There is also accumulating evidence that some plaque VSMCs derive from ECs following endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). EndMT, driven by transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signalling, oscillatory shear stress, oxidative stress, and hypoxia, promotes progression of experimental atherosclerosis and correlates with an unstable plaque phenotype in humans.31,32 Although these studies provide in-depth insights into VSMC diversity, additional research is needed to further explore VSMC heterogeneity in relation to their function in vascular disease.
3.4 Source of VSMCs in human atherosclerosis
The source and fate of VSMCs in human atherosclerosis is more difficult to determine, as lineage- tracing studies are harder to perform. However, identification of cells of VSMC origin in human plaques is possible by detecting an epigenetic marker specific to VSMCs (H3K4me2 of the Myh11 locus) on histological sections and persists upon phenotypic switching.12 Phenotypically modified VSMCs have also been identified in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) datasets from human coronary36,37 and carotid38,39 artery lesions and the transcriptomic cell clusters of advanced human coronary lesions are remarkably similar to those of carotid plaques despite their differential developmental origin38 and to those of mouse brachiocephalic artery plaques.37
However, there are many differences between the human and mouse arterial intima. For example, the normal human intima contains pre-existing VSMCs and diffuse intimal thickenings develop early in life before atherosclerosis development.40 Compared to medial VSMCs, these pre-existing intimal VSMCs have different transcriptomic profiles41 and display a more synthetic phenotype when exposed to various stress signals.26,42 The contribution of VSMCs from pre-existing intimal VSMCs vs. underlying medial VSMCs to human atherosclerotic plaques is not known, and whether they also undergo clonal expansion is still unclear. Overall, the complex differences between medial, intimal and plaque VSMCs, including the distinct localisation of atherosclerotic lesions and positional identity of VSMCs in humans vs. mice, could influence VSMC plasticity and their ultimate role in atherosclerosis.
4. Phenotype of plaque VSMCs
4.1 VSMC phenotypic switching
The term phenotypic switching is often used to describe de-differentiation of a contractile VSMC to a synthetic state, but can refer to any type of phenotypic change to an alternative non-contractile VSMC phenotype. Although VSMCs within atherosclerotic plaques are oligoclonal, each VSMC clone appears to have a high level of plasticity, and is capable of transforming into different phenotypes (Figure 1).11,13,27,35 While these phenotypes have been known for many years, scRNA-seq has allowed clusters of VSMCs to be identified expressing a transcriptional profile that corresponds to these phenotypes. Phenotypic switching is generally thought to occur in the intima; however, medial VSMCs underlying lesions also lose contractile markers in atherosclerosis9 and after vascular injury,8 likely in response to lipids or mitogens released after injury.17 Medial VSMC phenotypic switching may occur before migration and proliferation, and independently of clonal expansion.26,27,36 VSMCs can adopt a wide range of phenotypes in the intima and media, and VSMCs can alternate between different phenotypes in response to various environmental cues, with different effects on atherogenesis (Figure 2) and markers of plaque stability (Figure 3).26,43 Importantly, phenotypic switching seems to be a (at least partly) reversible process and thus therapeutically modifiable.38
Figure 3.
Regulatory pathways and putative role of different VSMC phenotypes on plaque stability. The major regulatory pathways controlling the transition from contractile to phenotypically modified VSMCs include the pluripotency factors KLF4 and OCT4, growth factors PDGF-BB and TGFβ, and NFκB. KLF4 represses expression of contractile genes via multiple mechanisms including binding to SRF, thereby antagonizing MYOCD tethering to SRF. OCT4 is transcriptionally regulated by KLF4 but plays an opposite role in VSMC phenotypic switching. NFκB decreases MYOCD expression by binding to its promoter leading to reduced expression of contractile genes. PDGF-BB suppresses contractile gene expression via different mechanisms, which partially involves KLF4. The contractile phenotype is positively controlled by the growth factor TGFβ and miRNAs miR143 and miR145 that work partially in concert to down-regulate klf4. Also epigenetic regulation by histone acetylation (Ac) and methylation (Me) at the promoter of contractile genes facilitates VSMC differentiation by increasing chromatin accessibility for MYOCD/SRF complexes. Phenotypic switching results in a range of different VSMC phenotypes, some of which are postulated to have predominantly negative effects (foam cell and macrophage-like), neutral effects (osteochondrogenic or synthetic VSMCs), or mostly positive effects on plaque stability (mesenchymal cell- or myofibroblast-like/fibromyocyte cells). Solid evidence for EC-like and adipocyte-like VSMCs in atherosclerosis is currently lacking. To date, only myofibroblast-like VSMCs have been truly associated with plaque stability in mice, although the ability of VSMCs to undergo reprogramming into a stem cell-like state has potential to transdifferentiate into athero-protective VSMC subtypes. TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; OCT4, octamer binding transcription factor; SRF, serum response factor; MYOCD, myocardin.
4.1.1 Contractile vs. synthetic VSMCs
The switch from contractile to synthetic phenotype is defined by loss of contractile markers (e.g. ACTA2, MYH11, TAGLN and calponin) with gain of synthetic organelles, migratory and proliferative properties, and plays a critical role in both neointimal hyperplasia and atherogenesis42 (Figure 3).26 Historically, this phenotypic switch was viewed as the hallmark of vascular repair, a reversible process wherein VSMCs return to their contractile state after completing vessel repair.5,44 For example, neointimal VSMCs re-acquire their contractile markers after injury in a rat balloon injury model.45 In contrast, VSMCs retain their non-contractile status during atherosclerosis due to the continuous exposure to phenotypic switching-inducing stimuli, although they may maintain their ability to revert back to their contractile phenotype.38
4.1.2 Foam cells
Historically, foam cells were viewed as bone marrow-derived macrophages in fatty deposits in artery walls, where they ingest low-density lipoproteins (LDL), giving them a foamy appearance. While macrophages do contribute to foam cells within atherosclerotic plaques, VSMCs also transform into foam cells when exposed to aggregated or oxidised LDL in the intima and media of hyperlipidaemic mice and humans,16,46 and the majority of foam cells in atherosclerotic plaques appear derived from VSMCs.16,46 Lipid uptake traditionally occurs through specialized scavenger receptors (e.g. SR-A and CD36), but may also involve alternative pathways, such as phagocytosis and autophagy.27,47 While clearance of lipid species may be beneficial at first, lipid loaded-VSMCs in culture secrete a variety of pro-inflammatory mediators48 and undergo apoptosis from free cholesterol overload,49 likely compromising plaque stability (Figure 3). The cholesterol excess in VSMCs is likely the result of inadequate cholesterol efflux due to reduced expression of the ABCA1 efflux transporter16,46 and/or impaired autophagy in advanced plaques.50
4.1.3 Macrophage-like
Macrophage-like VSMCs occur in both human11,16 and mouse17,27 atherosclerotic plaques, and also in the media of atherosclerotic mice.26 The switch to a macrophage-like cell is likely driven by lipid accumulation, as cholesterol loading transdifferentiates VSMCs into macrophage-like cells in culture,51 and can be reversed by stimulating cholesterol efflux via apolipoprotein A1 and high-density lipoprotein (HDL).17 Macrophage-like VSMCs up-regulate ‘macrophage markers’, such as LGALS3, CD68,51 and pro-inflammatory cytokines [e.g. monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1)],11 yet not all lipid-laden VSMCs adopt a macrophage-like phenotype in vivo36 and not all plaque VSMCs expressing LGALS3 adopt a macrophage-like state.37 Instead, LGALS3 is expressed in >60% of mouse plaque VSMCs during a transition state to a non-macrophage but pro-inflammatory and osteochondrogenic (see Section 4.1.5) VSMC phenotype, and may be the first cell type to invest the plaque.37 Hence, the question arises whether macrophage-like VSMCs are as harmful for plaque stability as their myeloid counterparts. Indeed, macrophage-like VSMCs are transcriptionally and functionally different from myeloid-derived macrophages in culture17,52 and emerge later in atherogenesis than myeloid-derived macrophages that enter via the circulation.38 Overall, the presence of macrophage markers in VSMCs does not imply full functionality as macrophages nor cell specificity, making it difficult to predict their impact on atherosclerotic plaque growth and stability. Nevertheless, based on their pro-inflammatory profile, macrophage-like VSMCs are likely detrimental for plaque stability (Figure 3), although their reversibility might offer the opportunity to therapeutically inhibit phenotypic switching.
4.1.4 Adipocyte-like
Lipid accumulation in VSMCs may result from both uptake (and impaired degradation or efflux) of extracellular lipoproteins and de novo lipogenesis of fatty acids via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma and the liver X receptor pathway.53 For example, human VSMCs cultured in an adipogenic differentiation medium transdifferentiate into adipocyte-like cells expressing adipsin and leptin. Although VSMCs do not fully develop into mature adipocytes, lipid-containing VSMCs express elevated adipsin and lipogenesis genes in human atherosclerotic plaques.53 Exposure of mouse VSMCs to a similar adipogenic cocktail promotes VSMC proliferation and activation of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pathways,54 although whether this is associated with a switch to adipocyte-like VSMCs is unclear. These studies emphasize again the high level of plasticity of VSMCs, but the role and abundance of adipocyte-like VSMCs in atherogenesis is unclear, illustrated by a postulated neutral-to-negative position on the ‘plaque-stability scale’ (Figure 3).
4.1.5 Osteochondrogenic
Vascular calcification is characterised by hydroxyapatite deposits in the vessel wall, and is associated with increased CVD risk.55 Vascular calcification is a tightly regulated process, primarily driven by VSMCs developing an osteochondrogenic phenotype in response to high levels of calcium and phosphate,56,57 and lineage-tracing studies in mice show that 98% of all osteochondrogenic cells in plaques are VSMC-derived.58 Osteochondrogenic VSMCs up-regulate osteochondrogenic markers [e.g. runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), SRY-related HMG-box (SOX9), and osteopontin)], deposit calcification-prone matrix (e.g. collagen type II and X), and secrete calcifying vesicles.57 Simultaneously, cells down-regulate expression of molecules that inhibit calcification (e.g. vit K-dependent matrix Gla-protein and fetuin A). However, it is unclear whether contractile VSMCs can directly transform into an osteochondrogenic phenotype57 or first have to undergo a switch to a synthetic phenotype,59,60 or an intermediary LGALS3+ cell state.37 Vascular calcification occurs in the intima of atherosclerotic plaques but also in the media where it promotes arterial stiffness.61,62 Moreover, mouse and human coronary VSMCs with an osteogenic gene signature are associated with plaque destabilisation.37 In particular, micro-calcified deposits (<50 µm) are associated with increased inflammation and mostly observed in the fibrous cap of human lesions, and thus considered detrimental for plaque stability. In contrast, macrocalcifications (>200 µm) often accumulate in the deep intima or necrotic core in organized structures and may promote plaque stability.63 Interestingly, cultured calcifying VSMCs are still functionally different from mature, bone-forming osteoblasts, and more susceptible to apoptosis.64 The opposite roles of micro- and macro-calcification in atherosclerosis limits its therapeutic potential and is illustrated by a neutral position on the ‘plaque stability scale’ (Figure 3).
4.1.6 Myofibroblast-like
A myofibroblast-like or ‘fibromyocyte’36 refers to differentiation of a contractile VSMC into a fibroblast-like cell. Myofibroblast-like VSMCs exhibit a fibroblast-like transcriptional signature characterised by increased expression of fibronectin 1, osteoprotegerin, collagen type 1α1, and various small proteoglycans, including up-regulation of fibroblast-specific pathways. These myofibroblast-like cells have been identified in mouse plaques, particularly accumulating in the fibrous cap, and in a scRNA-seq dataset from human coronary plaques.36 Differentiation into fibromyocytes is regulated, at least partially, by the CAD-associated transcription factor TCF21. Reduced TCF21 expression is associated with increased CVD risk, and loss of Tcf21 inhibits phenotypic modulation and attenuates fibromyocyte number in the fibrous cap, suggesting an athero-protective role (Figure 3).36 This study also showed that the majority of VSMCs undergo phenotypic modulation into one main cell type rather multiple different phenotypes,27,37,38 that phenotype modulation can occur in the media, and that genes that are causally associated with CVD can fundamentally alter VSMC phenotype switching in vivo.
4.1.7 EC-like
A limited number of studies report that contractile VSMCs can transdifferentiate into an EC-like phenotype. For example, mouse VSMCs cultured under laminar shear stress show increased expression of EC markers (CD31, von Willebrand factor, and VE-cadherin).65 More recent work shows that human VSMCs can convert into ECs in culture, albeit indirectly, via an intermediary progenitor state elicited by stem cell reprogramming factors,66 with further differentiation into ECs regulated via Notch signalling. Interestingly, these VSMC-derived ECs exhibit fully fledged EC functions and express CD31 in vitro and in vivo but could potentially promote intraplaque neovascularisation and haemorrhage associated with human plaque rupture67(Figure 3). Direct evidence of endothelial-like VSMCs in human atherosclerosis is currently lacking, although multipotent VSMC-derived intermediary cells expressing endothelial markers were found in a scRNA-seq dataset from mouse and human plaques.38
4.1.8 MSC-like
A rare population of MSC-like Sca1+ cells has been identified in medial differentiated VSMCs, which is increased upon vessel injury and exposure to stimuli known to induce phenotypic switching.35 These medial Sca1+ VSMCs might represent a ‘first responder’ subpopulation that could undergo or regulate clonal expansion in atherosclerosis in response to environmental cues. Differentiated medial VSMCs can also give rise to adventitial Sca1+ progenitor cells that contribute to adventitial remodelling.68 The VSMCs undergo a ‘reprogramming process’ controlled by Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) and can transdifferentiate into different cell types, including macrophage-like, EC-like, chondrocyte-like, and adipocyte-like under defined in vitro conditions. Although these studies identify VSMC migration in opposite directions, they highlight the ability of Sca1+ VSMC-derived cells to promote VSMC transdifferentiation and underline the extremely high degree of plasticity of VSMCs. The highly plastic nature of mesenchymal-like VSMCs offers the opportunity to therapeutically push these cells into a plaque-stabilising phenotype (Figure 3).
4.2 Regulation of VSMC phenotype
The list of factors that regulate VSMC de-differentiation, proliferation, and migration is extremely long and covered by some excellent and more extensive reviews.69–71 We will therefore focus on those known to regulate VSMC phenotypic switching, including TCFs, post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs, epigenetic modifications, and various environmental stimuli.
4.2.1 Transcriptional
The expression of contractile genes is controlled by the serum response factor (SRF) and its co-activator myocardin (MYOCD), the former binding as a homodimer to the DNA consensus sequence CC(A/T)6GG known as a CArG box within the promoters of contraction-related genes.72 SRF is ubiquitously expressed and cannot activate transcription of contractile genes alone; binding to MYOCD—which is selectively expressed in VSMCs and cardiac muscle—is required to promote contractile gene transcription.73 Many factors that control VSMC phenotypic switching alter MYOCD expression or activity either by direct binding to the Myocd promoter or interfering with its binding to SRF (Figures 1 and 3). MYOCD is the chief regulator of VSMC differentiation, although other TCFs have been identified to interact with SRF, including co-activators and co-repressors, such as KLF4 and ETS-like-1 protein (ELK-1).69
The pluripotency factor KLF4 is a major regulator of VSMC phenotype modulation.11 KLF4 represses expression of contractile genes via different mechanisms,74 including: (i) binding to the G/C repressor element of contractile gene promoters, (ii) recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDAC2/5), causing transcriptional repression of contractile genes, (iii) binding to SRF, thereby antagonizing SRF binding to CArG-boxes, and (iv) complexing with phosphorylated ELK1 and SRF, thereby antagonizing MYOCD binding to SRF. KLF4 induces VSMC transdifferentiation into macrophage-like and MSC-like phenotypes and promotes atherosclerosis.11 Moreover, KLF4 contributes to VSMC switching into LGALS3+ chondrocyte-like cells,37 and osteogenic cells by binding to and cooperating with RUNX2.75 The relative abundance of Runx2 and Sox9 regulates differentiation into osteogenic or chondrogenic lineages, respectively.57 Octamer binding transcription factor (OCT4) is another pluripotency factor that regulates phenotypic switching, but has opposite effects to KLF4 (Figure 3).76 Indeed, plaques of VSMC Klf4 vs. Oct4 knockout mice have virtually opposite gene expression patterns and their putative target genes play an important role in regulating VSMC phenotypic changes.37 In contrast to Klf4, Oct4 reduces atherogenesis and promotes fibrous cap VSMC investment, potentially via increased migration.76 Oct4 activation in VSMCs is associated with hydroxy-methylation of the promoter and transcriptional regulation via hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha and KLF4.76
Other TCFs regulate VSMC differentiation through MYOCD (Figures 1 and 3). For example, TCF21 binds to the Myocd promoter, reducing its expression and interfering with the formation of the MYOCD-SRF complex.77 The nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) p65 subunit binds to the Myocd promoter, decreasing its expression; repression of Myocd by NFκB acts in concert with KLF4,78 while forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) binds to the Myocd promoter and negatively regulates Myocd and contractile marker gene expression.79
4.2.2 MicroRNAs
miRNA143 and miRNA145 are the most well-documented microRNAs regulating the contractile phenotype of VSMCs (Figures 1 and 3).80 miRNA143/145 block VSMC de-differentiation and proliferation by inhibiting Klf4 and Elk1 through binding with their mRNA 3′ UTR region.81 miRNA143/145 expression is positively controlled by SRF and MYOCD, but reduced in injured or atherosclerotic aortas.81 Moreover, cholesterol loading promotes VSMC transdifferentiation into macrophage-like cells via the miRNA143/145-MYOCD axis.52 Hence, down-regulation of miRNA143/145 may promote atherogenesis through VSMC de-differentiation, while the MYOCD-induced miRNA1 can target Klf4 and promote VSMC differentiation.82
MicroRNAs implicated in VSMC phenotypic switching (Figure 1) also include miRNA221 and miRNA222.83 miRNA221 stimulates proliferation by down-regulating the cell-cycle inhibitor p27Kip1, while miRNA221 targets the proto-oncogene c-kit, which reduces MYOCD expression followed by reduced contractile gene expression.84 miRNA221/222 also promote VSMC switching into osteochondrogenic like-cells and calcification.85 miRNA21 and miRNA124 inhibit VSMC differentiation by down-regulating specificity protein 1;86,87 the latter promotes a contractile VSMC phenotype by binding to the G/C repressor element in the promoter of contractile genes.
In addition to microRNAs, some long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) regulate VSMC proliferation and phenotype. LncRNAs regulate gene expression via different mechanisms, including through ‘sponging’ miRNAs. For example, the lncRNA SMILR promotes VSMC proliferation through direct regulation of mitotic processes and its expression is increased in unstable vs. stable human atherosclerotic plaques.88 The lncRNA MALAT1 stimulates VSMC proliferation and migration89 and promotes aortic stiffness.90
4.2.3 Epigenetic
Epigenetic modifications of amino acid residues on histones (e.g. acetylation and methylation) regulate contractile gene expression during VSMC phenotypic switching by altering chromatin structure and changing accessibility for TCFs70 (Figure 3). For example, Acta2 and Myh11 are activated through histone acetylation during VSMC differentiation allowing SRF binding.91 The transcriptional activity of MYOCD is enhanced by histone acetylation via p300 histone acetyltransferase (HAT) or inhibited by class II HDACs.92 In contrast, KLF4-mediated recruitment of HDAC2/5 to the G/C repressor element represses contractile gene expression.93 Collectively, increased histone acetylation of CarG box chromatin facilitates contractile gene expression by improving chromatin accessibility for MYOCD/SRF complexes through stearic hindering. HATs and HDACs also regulate many other VSMC processes including proliferation, migration, and matrix deposition that may influence VSMC phenotype and behaviour in atherosclerosis.94
MYOCD/SRF binding to CArG box chromatin is also associated with histone methylation. The histone modification H3K4me2 is enriched at the promoter of contractile genes during VSMC differentiation and is associated with increased tethering of MYOCD.95 Interestingly, H3K4me2 of the Myh11 locus is restricted to VSMCs (Figure 1) in humans and mice, and persists in phenotypically modulated VSMCs that have lost their contractile markers, permitting its use to identify VSMCs in human atherosclerosis.12 The retention of an epigenetic signature in phenotypically modulated VSMCs as a reminder remnant of their contractile state might explain the reversible nature of phenotype switching.43
4.2.4 Environmental stimuli
The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) is up-regulated upon injury and promotes VSMC proliferation and de-differentiation via multiple mechanisms69 (Figures 1 and 3). Through the PDGFRβ receptor, PDGF-BB stimulates ELK1 phosphorylation, which competes with MYOCD for the same docking site on SRF, suppressing contractile gene expression.96 In addition, the effects of PDGF-BB on phenotypic switching are partially mediated via KLF497 and miRNA221.84 The Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway promotes VSMC proliferation and intimal thickening98 and promotes VSMCs osteogenic transdifferentiation through activation of the Runx2 promoter.99
TGFβ is one of few growth factors that promotes VSMC differentiation (Figures 1 and 3). Contractile gene expression is regulated via the TCFs SMAD2 or SMAD3 that either bind to SMAD binding sites within contractile gene promoters or interact with SRF in a CArG-dependent manner.100 Moreover, TGFβ blocks VSMC phenotypic switching by down-regulating Klf4 through miRNA143/145.101 The latter are transcriptionally activated by TGFβ through MYOCD and CArG box binding. TGFβ is a multifunctional growth factor that regulates VSMC proliferation and hypertrophy, and has both matrix synthesising (e.g. stimulates production of collagens) and proteolytic (e.g. activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)) properties, and can thus have secondary effects on VSMC phenotype.69
Recently, integrin β3 has been shown to regulate VSMC phenotype and clonality through cell-autonomous and paracrine effects.19 Integrin β3 is produced by VSMCs and macrophages, and inhibits VSMC transdifferentiation into macrophage-like cells and limits VSMC proliferation and migration (Figure 1). In atherosclerosis, integrin β3 prevents clonal expansion of VSMC-derived cells in the fibrous cap and lesion, suggesting that macrophages may regulate the recruitment of medial VSMCs into the developing lesion via secretion of integrin β3.19
5. Role of VSMCs in atherosclerosis
By adopting different phenotypes, it is clear that VSMCs might have beneficial or maladaptive roles in atherogenesis (Figure 2) and plaque stability (Figure 3). Phenotypically modified VSMCs can also secrete a wide range of cytokines that can influence neighbouring cells in a paracrine manner. Although VSMCs can revert to their contractile phenotype under certain conditions,38,45 there is no evidence to date that intimal VSMCs can migrate back to the media. Hence, the final content of VSMCs within the lesion is determined by the balance between VSMC immigration, proliferation, death, and senescence. We will therefore review the role of these processes in atherosclerosis, and particularly insights gained from recent lineage-tracing and scRNA-seq studies.
5.1 VSMC growth and motility
5.1.1 VSMC migration
VSMC migration from media to intima is an established part of most theories of atherogenesis, but there are multiple unanswered questions about its precise role and regulation. For example: (i) what is the contribution of migration to proliferation in human (or indeed mouse) atherosclerosis, (ii) does migration depend upon contractile-synthetic de-differentiation, and (iii) does migration of VSMCs occur before proliferation, or can both processes occur simultaneously. In general, VSMCs have been described to migrate into the intima followed by proliferation and formation of the fibrous cap;42,44,102 migration of medial VSMCs may be preceded by proliferation103 or both dividing and non-dividing VSMCs can migrate and contribute to lesion formation.23 However, lineage-tracing studies showing VSMC monochromatic clonal patches in plaques instead of the medial mosaic suggests that VSMC migration occurs independent of proliferation, and is not a major contributor to lesion formation.13,19,27 Similarly, the observation that VSMC-derived neointimal patches are connected to medial patches expressing the same reporter colour suggests that VSMC proliferation already occurs in the media and thus precedes migration.27 Although suggestive, these theories are based on indirect methods of exclusion of proliferative clonally expanded VSMCs; we therefore need new methods to directly monitor VSMC migration to reveal its true contribution to atherosclerosis.
5.1.2 VSMC proliferation
Historically, VSMCs were thought to accumulate in atherosclerotic lesions by ongoing proliferation in response to injury or inflammatory cues. However, VSMCs in or derived from advanced atherosclerotic plaques exhibit low proliferative indices,104,105 and recent lineage-tracing studies might explain this proliferation paradox. For example, lineage-tracing indicates that VSMC proliferation initiates in the media and VSMC progeny then migrate into the intima, where they continue to divide in an oligoclonal fashion (Figure 2).27 These few VSMC clones are highly proliferative and form the fibrous cap and invade the plaque core,19 possibly reflecting migration of ACTA2+ fibrous cap cells. Multiple rounds of cell division to form large oligoclonal plaques potentially explain the cellular senescence (and therefore low proliferative indices) observed in advanced atherosclerotic plaques.
5.1.3 VSMC senescence
Cellular senescence is defined as a state of irreversible growth arrest and categorized as replicative senescence, due to replicative exhaustion of cell lifespan, or stress-induced premature senescence induced by many external stimuli, such as DNA-damaging agents or oxidative stress.106 Both types of senescence activate a DNA damage response to initiate growth arrest and a senescent secretory phenotype (SASP) that creates a pro-inflammatory environment (see Section 5.2.3).106 Human plaque VSMCs show reduced proliferation, early senescence, and up-regulation of cell-cycle arrest markers including p16INK4a and p21, associated with hypophosphorylation of the tumour suppressor retinoblastoma protein.107 Moreover, human plaque VSMCs have much shorter telomeres than medial VSMCs.107 VSMC senescence promotes atherosclerosis and features of plaque instability in mice when genes promoting senescence are expressed from the Tagln promoter,108,109 potentially driven via an IL1α-dependent SASP,110 but it is unclear whether different VSMC phenotypes show similar levels of cell senescence and how they are regulated. Nevertheless, there is strong evidence linking VSMC senescence and aging with medial calcification.57 For example, replicative senescence111 or IL1β-induced senescence112 of VSMCs enhances calcification through initiating the transition to an osteoblastic phenotype in vitro.
5.2 VSMC secretory and paracrine function
VSMCs secrete a variety of bioactive molecules, including matrix proteins and pro-inflammatory mediators. Some of these molecules are packed into vesicles and shed from the cell surface to transfer signals between cells. The secretome of phenotypically switched VSMCs may contain crucial information from the donor cell and even dictate the fate of the recipient cell. Unravelling the VSMC secretome may lead to the identification of specific molecules that can be used as future CVD biomarkers.
5.2.1 ECM proteins
VSMCs produce ECM as a major structural component of the vessel wall.113 The mechano-elastic properties of arteries are largely maintained by three ECM types: elastic fibres, fibrillar collagen, and large aggregating proteoglycans, but the latter can also promote atherosclerosis by retaining apolipoprotein B-lipoproteins.113 The interaction between VSMCs and ECM is a dynamic, bi-directional process, and ECM content is determined by the balance between production and degradation. In early plaque development, MMPs are essential for VSMC migration by degrading the cage of connective tissue surrounding VSMCs.114 However, both the type and amount of ECM synthesised varies between VSMC phenotypes, and cultured synthetic VSMCs, macrophage-like VSMCs and VSMC-derived foam cells secrete proteolytic MMPs.
Recent advances in proteomics have enabled significant progress in our understanding of the role of ECM in atherosclerosis. For example, a 4-protein signature comprising MMP9, S100A8/S100A9, cathepsin D, and galectin-3-binding protein can differentiate symptomatic vs. asymptomatic carotid plaques, and could be used as biomarkers for risk stratification of CVD patients.115 Similarly, a set of fibrous cap-related proteins including vitronectin, TGFβ-induced protein, complement factor 7, and apolipoprotein B have been identified in the plasma of CAD patients.116 Mouse atherosclerotic aortas show an osteoclast-specific signature among known collagenases and MMPs,117 and a few novel ECM factors, such as matrilin-2 and peroxidasin, although their exact role in atherosclerosis and relation to VSMCs is unclear. Proteomic profiling of secreted proteins from an atherosclerotic swine model revealed differential expression of many proteins related to VSMC activation or migration.118 Chitinase-3-like-protein 1 in particular was up-regulated in plaque VSMCs in relation to disease stage, and in plasma of fat-fed animals vs. controls. The advances in proteomics and emerging discoveries regarding the role of ECM in the atherosclerosis pave the way for the development of novel clinical disease biomarkers.
5.2.2 Pro-inflammatory mediators
Synthetic VSMCs play a major role in forming and maintaining the fibrous cap by secreting ECM, yet their overall role in plaque stability could be detrimental. Synthetic VSMCs secrete a wide variety of pro-inflammatory molecules and matrix-degrading enzymes that can cause cell death of neighbouring cells.42,114 Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL1β, IL6, and MCP1 promote atherogenesis by stimulating monocyte recruitment and cell death119 and synthetic VSMCs express a range of adhesion molecules and receptors (e.g. Toll-like-receptors) that promote monocyte recruitment and regulate intracellular inflammatory signalling, respectively. Moreover, synthetic VSMCs secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can drive vascular calcification (see Section 5.2.4).59 Hence, synthetic VSMCs are beneficial for fibrous cap formation, but depending on the local environment and the disease stage, may promote inflammation, calcification, cell senescence, and plaque instability.
5.2.3 SASP
Senescent cells secrete a spectrum of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors known as SASP, that drives many age-related diseases including atherosclerosis by sustaining a state of chronic low-grade inflammation, called ‘inflammaging’.120 Clearance of senescence cells by immune cells can be impaired in disease, propagating their accumulation.121 The SASP can self-amplify its secretory network in an autocrine interleukin-dependent manner,122 and induce paracrine senescence mediated via TGFβ123 or via EVs (see Section 5.2.4).124 Through their SASP, senescent cells attract immune cells and induce proliferation, apoptosis, or alter the differentiation status of neighbouring healthy cells,106 including phenotypic transition of neighbouring VSMCs. For example, IL6 released by senescent human VSMCs favours their transition to an osteogenic phenotype125 but may also promote reprogramming of neighbouring cells into a stem cell-like phenotype,126 implying that a small number of senescent cells can have marked effects on disease development.
5.2.4 VSMC-derived vesicles
VSMCs shed different types of EVs, which can be categorized based on their size: exosomes<micro-vesicles<apoptotic bodies. EVs can mediate cell–cell communications and play important roles in both physiological and pathophysiological processes.127 For example, EV contents include bioactive molecules, such as lipids and proteins, but also DNA, mRNA, microRNA, and lncRNA.128 In addition to transferring cargo, EVs interact and exchange crucial information with the target cell, to change their phenotype or even reprogramme the recipient cell.128
Synthetic VSMCs in particular secrete exosomes and may drive calcification when the EV contains phosphatidylserine (PS), Annexin A6, and low concentrations of calcification inhibitors.129 By exposing PS on the surface, and possibly tissue factor, exosomes may also promote vascular coagulation.129 Matrix vesicles containing remnants of apoptotic VSMCs can act as a nucleation site for calcification in plaques,130 and osteochondrocyte-like VSMCs secrete calcifying vesicles that further propagate calcification.60 In addition, senescent cells secrete increased EVs compared to non-senescent cells,124,131 which promote paracrine senescence,124 cell proliferation, inflammation, wound healing repair, and DNA damage response pathways.124,131,132
5.3 VSMC death
Different forms of VSMC death occur in the atherosclerotic plaque, including apoptosis, necrosis, and various forms of regulated necrosis (e.g. necroptosis and ferroptosis).113,134 However, with the exception of calcifying VSMCs, the susceptibility of different phenotypically modulated VSMCs to cell death is not known, in large part because of difficulties in markers for both cell death and VSMCs in vivo.
5.3.1 Apoptosis
Apoptotic indices are low in early plaques but increase as lesions become more advanced135 and are higher in symptomatic plaques compared to stable lesions.136 Apoptotic debris accumulates particularly in the core region, but apoptosis markers are transient, such that apoptotic indices do not measure apoptosis rates or efficiency of apoptotic cell clearance, and can label necrotic cells.137 Given these limitations, the effects and incidence of apoptosis of different VSMC phenotypes are mostly unknown. VSMC apoptosis driven by expression of a suicide gene from the Tagln promoter accelerates atherogenesis, and promotes plaque vulnerability, calcification, and medial degeneration,138 suggesting that apoptosis of medial contractile VSMCs or myofibroblast-like VSMCs in the intima is detrimental. However, further delineation of the effects of apoptosis of different VSMCs requires identification of phenotype-specific TCFs for selective cell killing.
5.3.2 Necrosis
Necrosis has long been considered an accidental and uncontrolled form of cell death. However, recent studies demonstrate that necrosis is a regulated cell death mechanism, with subtypes, such as necroptosis regulated by receptor interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 and ferroptosis characterised by accumulation of lipid-peroxidation products and lethal amounts of reactive-oxygen species derived from iron metabolism.133 Necrosis in atherosclerosis is triggered by various stimuli, such as high levels of reactive-oxygen species, highly oxidised LDL, depletion of cellular energy, increased intracellular calcium levels, and mitochondrial Ca2+-overload.134 Inefficient efferocytosis of apoptotic VSMCs also leads to secondary necrosis and IL1-driven inflammation.139
Plaque cell necrosis contributes to plaque vulnerability by releasing pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. IL1α), MMPs, and thrombogenic factors (e.g. tissue factor) whereas inhibition of necrosis improves features of plaque stability in mice.134 However, lineage-tracing studies suggest that we need to re-evaluate the role of necrosis in atherosclerosis. Plaque cell necrosis is usually quantified by measuring the necrotic core, and necrotic cells have been reported to be predominantly (foam cell) macrophages. However, the necrotic core also contains lipid material (membrane remnants, cholesterol esters, and crystals) and lineage-traced VSMC-derived cells.13 The precise incidence and role of necrosis in different VSMC phenotypes will require studies using lineage-tracing coupled to specific markers of necrosis in vivo.
6. Future perspectives
6.1 Practical recommendations for the analysis of plaque VSMCs
The observation that contractile proteins are down-regulated in atherosclerotic plaques and expressed by cells of non-VSMC origin has led to the general agreement that these contractile markers cannot be used alone to definitively identify VSMCs in plaques. Similarly, VSMCs undergoing phenotypic modulation can express markers conventionally used for macrophages, MSCs, adipocytes, and osteochondrocyte-like cells. In contrast, a more accurate assessment of VSMCs and their different phenotypes can be achieved by lineage-tracing using permanent markers of VSMC origin inherited by their progeny coupled with protein markers (e.g. ACTA2, MYH11, TAGLN, or CD68) and transcriptional signatures obtained by scRNA-seq or in situ transcriptomics. Although we know some of the regulatory pathways that determine transition from contractile to synthetic phenotypes, and can postulate that particular VSMC phenotypes have a positive, neutral or negative effect on atherogenesis and overall plaque stability (Figure 3), currently we lack experimental proof of the role of specific phenotypes from animal studies, or correlation with events in human studies. In the meantime, surrogate markers of plaque stability, such as fibrous cap thickness, inflammatory cell content within the cap, relative necrotic core size, and neovascularisation can still be valuable indicators.
6.2 VSMC-associated CAD risk
Atherosclerosis is a complex disease controlled by both genetic and environmental factors, and more than 300 genomic loci are associated with CAD risk in humans.140 Interestingly, approx. three-fourth of these loci are not associated with typical (lipid-related) CAD risk factors141 and may regulate their effects through VSMCs. For example, the risk locus 9p21.3 is the most strongly associated with CAD.142 9p21.3 risk variants overlap the 3' region of the non-coding RNA ANRIL and are associated with reduced expression of the genes CDKN2A (encodes p16INK4A and p14ARF) and CDKN2B (encodes p15 and p16INK4B) located downstream of the SNPs,142 both of which regulate VSMC proliferation and senescence. Similarly, multiple SNPs at chromosome 6q23.2 are located in the TCF21 gene.143 Increased TCF21 expression is associated with reduced CAD risk and VSMC phenotypic modulation, particularly the formation of myofibroblast-like cells.36 ATACseq experiments revealed that open chromatin regions in hVSMCs in particular are enriched for CAD risk variants144 and TCF21 binding sites.145 Indeed, quantitative trait variants located in CAD causal loci show allele-specific TCF21 binding and regulate chromatin accessibility and looping, suggesting that CAD-associated functional variants may underlie disease risk through regulating chromatin state.145 Many other genes involved in regulating VSMC phenotypic switching have also been identified as CAD-associated genes by combining genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling, including KLF4, PDGFRA, SIPA1, FES, and SMAD3 with SMAD3 and TCF21 exerting opposing roles.146 In addition to being a GWAS CAD gene, KLF4 might also regulate VSMC phenotype by regulating several previously reported CAD-associated gene loci.37 ECM genes, such as collagen type 4 alpha 1/2, fibronectin and integrin β5 are also found among CAD risk loci.113 Each of these genes will require functional characterisation of the causal variants and VSMC-specific manipulation in vivo to determine whether and how they regulate VSMC phenotype, atherogenesis, and features of plaque stability.
6.3 Therapeutic targeting of VSMC phenotypic switching
The integration of VSMC fate mapping and single-cell transcriptomics data from mouse studies with human single-cell genomics should allow identification of new candidate targets for therapeutic intervention. Current therapies for atherosclerosis focus mostly on lipid lowering, but the impact on plaque VSMCs and phenotypic switching is indirect, very limited, or simply unknown. For example, statins reduce foam cell formation,147 but whether VSMC-derived foam cells are targeted as efficiently as myeloid-derived foam cells is unknown. Statins promote plaque macrocalcification148 and delay VSMC senescence,149 and inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 prevents PDGF-induced VSMC switching in vitro,150 but whether this occurs though direct regulation of VSMC phenotype is unclear. We believe that the crucial role of different VSMC phenotypes in lesion development and plaque stability should focus new therapeutic strategies on stimulating the accumulation of ‘plaque stabilising’ VSMC phenotypes, eliminating the subpopulation of harmful VSMC phenotypes (e.g. pro-inflammatory, macrophage-like VSMCs), or switching detrimental to beneficial phenotypes (Figure 3), as recently shown by activation of retinoic acid signalling pathways.38 This study nicely demonstrates the strength of combining multi-genomic techniques with fate mapping tools, the remarkable overlap in VSMC phenotypes between mouse and human atherosclerosis, the reversible nature of VSMC phenotypes, and the pharmacological application to revert VSMCs into a more stable phenotype to improve plaque stability.
7. Conclusion
For many years, VSMCs have been underestimated, misidentified, and routinely branded as either promoting atherogenesis or stabilising plaques, or both. Recent advances in VSMC lineage-tracing and the new transcriptomics means we need to re-assess this situation. However, there are still many unanswered questions. For example, how are the processes of VSMC proliferation, migration, and phenotypic switching connected, and do they differ in the media and intima; how is phenotypic switching determined spatially in the atherosclerotic plaque; what are the functions of the different phenotypes; what are the equivalent processes in human atherosclerosis, and how many and how do CAD loci regulate VSMC switching? In particular, if (as suspected) phenotypic switching of VSMCs actively contributes to plaque progression and in many cases leads to plaque instability, what are the therapeutic options to convert VSMCs into an athero-protective phenotype? The next step is to integrate VSMC-specific fate mapping and single-cell transcriptomics with human genetics to reveal novel regulatory pathways and identify candidate targets to therapeutically modulate VSMC phenotypic switching. Therapeutic approaches should be tailored to target solely the subpopulation of mischievous VSMCs by either reversing their phenotype or reprogramming the cell to redirect them into athero-protective VSMCs.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Funding
This work was supported by British Heart Foundation Grants PG/16/11/32021, RG71070, RG84554, the National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, and the BHF Cambridge Centre for Research Excellence.
References
- 1.Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Otsuka F, Finn AV, Davis HR, Joner M, Virmani R.. Pathophysiology of native coronary, vein graft, and in-stent atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:79–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barquera S, Pedroza-Tobias A, Medina C, Hernandez-Barrera L, Bibbins-Domingo K, Lozano R, Moran AE.. Global overview of the epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Arch Med Res 2015;46:328–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Franck G, Mawson T, Sausen G, Salinas M, Masson GS, Cole A, Beltrami-Moreira M, Chatzizisis Y, Quillard T, Tesmenitsky Y, Shvartz E, Sukhova GK, Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M, Aikawa E, Croce KJ, Libby P.. Flow perturbation mediates neutrophil recruitment and potentiates endothelial injury via TLR2 in mice: implications for superficial erosion. Circ Res 2017;121:31–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Weber DK, Kutys R, Wight TN, Virmani R.. Differential accumulation of proteoglycans and hyaluronan in culprit lesions: insights into plaque erosion. ATVB 2002;22:1642–1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Owens GK.Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells.Physiol Rev 1995;75:487–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jones BA, Aly HM, Forsyth EA, Sidawy AN.. Phenotypic characterization of human smooth muscle cells derived from atherosclerotic tibial and peroneal arteries. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:883–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campbell JH, Campbell GR.. Smooth muscle phenotypic modulation–a personal experience. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:1784–1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Herring BP, Hoggatt AM, Burlak C, Offermanns S.. Previously differentiated medial vascular smooth muscle cells contribute to neointima formation following vascular injury. Vasc Cell 2014;6:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Burns A, Sinha S, McDonald OG, Owens GK.. A G/C element mediates repression of the SM22alpha promoter within phenotypically modulated smooth muscle cells in experimental atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2004;95:981–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Regan CP, Adam PJ, Madsen CS, Owens GK.. Molecular mechanisms of decreased smooth muscle differentiation marker expression after vascular injury.J Clin Invest 2000;106:1139–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shankman LS, Gomez D, Cherepanova OA, Salmon M, Alencar GF, Haskins RM, Swiatlowska P, Newman AA, Greene ES, Straub AC, Isakson B, Randolph GJ, Owens GK.. KLF4-dependent phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells has a key role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis. Nat Med 2015;21:628–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gomez D, Shankman LS, Nguyen AT, Owens GK.. Detection of histone modifications at specific gene loci in single cells in histological sections.Nat Methods 2013;10:171–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jacobsen K, Lund MB, Shim J, Gunnersen S, Fuchtbauer EM, Kjolby M, Carramolino L, Bentzon JF.. Diverse cellular architecture of atherosclerotic plaque derives from clonal expansion of a few medial SMCs. JCI Insight 2017;2:e95890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wissler RW, Vesselinovitch D.. Experimental models of human atherosclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1968;149:907–922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Balakrishnan KR, Kuruvilla S, Srinivasan A, Sehgal PK.. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Electron microscopic insights into the vascular biology of atherosclerosis: study of coronary endarterectomy specimens. Circulation 2007;115:e388–e390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Allahverdian S, Chehroudi AC, McManus BM, Abraham T, Francis GA.. Contribution of intimal smooth muscle cells to cholesterol accumulation and macrophage-like cells in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 2014;129:1551–1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Feil S, Fehrenbacher B, Lukowski R, Essmann F, Schulze-Osthoff K, Schaller M, Feil R.. Transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to macrophage-like cells during atherogenesis. Circ Res 2014;115:662–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Albarran-Juarez J, Kaur H, Grimm M, Offermanns S, Wettschureck N.. Lineage tracing of cells involved in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2016;251:445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Misra A, Feng Z, Chandran RR, Kabir I, Rotllan N, Aryal B, Sheikh AQ, Ding L, Qin L, Fernandez-Hernando C, Tellides G, Greif DM.. Integrin beta3 regulates clonality and fate of smooth muscle-derived atherosclerotic plaque cells. Nat Commun 2018;9:2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sinha S, Santoro MM.. New models to study vascular mural cell embryonic origin: implications in vascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:481–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wissler RW.The arterial medial cell, smooth muscle or multifunctional mesenchyme? J Atheroscler Res 1968;8:201–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK.. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011;473:317–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clowes AW, Schwartz SM.. Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery.Circ Res 1985;56:139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bentzon JF, Weile C, Sondergaard CS, Hindkjaer J, Kassem M, Falk E.. Smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis originate from the local vessel wall and not circulating progenitor cells in ApoE knockout mice. ATVB 2006;26:2696–2702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yu H, Stoneman V, Clarke M, Figg N, Xin HB, Kotlikoff M, Littlewood T, Bennett M.. Bone marrow-derived smooth muscle-like cells are infrequent in advanced primary atherosclerotic plaques but promote atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:1291–1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu M, Gomez D.. Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Diversity. ATVB 2019;39:1715–1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chappell J, Harman JL, Narasimhan VM, Yu H, Foote K, Simons BD, Bennett MR, Jorgensen HF.. Extensive proliferation of a subset of differentiated, yet plastic, medial vascular smooth muscle cells contributes to neointimal formation in mouse injury and atherosclerosis models. Circ Res 2016;119:1313–1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Y, Zhang Z, Torsney E, Afzal AR, Davison F, Metzler B, Xu Q.. Abundant progenitor cells in the adventitia contribute to atherosclerosis of vein grafts in ApoE-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 2004;113:1258–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tigges U, Komatsu M, Stallcup WB.. Adventitial pericyte progenitor/mesenchymal stem cells participate in the restenotic response to arterial injury. J Vasc Res 2013;50:134–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Coen M, Gabbiani G, Bochaton-Piallat ML.. Myofibroblast-mediated adventitial remodeling: an underestimated player in arterial pathology.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:2391–2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen PY, Qin L, Baeyens N, Li G, Afolabi T, Budatha M, Tellides G, Schwartz MA, Simons M.. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives atherosclerosis progression. J Clin Invest 2015;125:4514–4528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Evrard SM, Lecce L, Michelis KC, Nomura-Kitabayashi A, Pandey G, Purushothaman K-R, d’Escamard V, Li JR, Hadri L, Fujitani K, Moreno PR, Benard L, Rimmele P, Cohain A, Mecham B, Randolph GJ, Nabel EG, Hajjar R, Fuster V, Boehm M, Kovacic JC.. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability. Nat Commun 2016;7:11853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kramann R, Goettsch C, Wongboonsin J, Iwata H, Schneider RK, Kuppe C, Kaesler N, Chang-Panesso M, Machado FG, Gratwohl S, Madhurima K, Hutcheson JD, Jain S, Aikawa E, Humphreys BD.. Adventitial MSC-like cells are progenitors of vascular smooth muscle cells and drive vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. Cell Stem Cell 2016;19:628–642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nurnberg ST, Cheng K, Raiesdana A, Kundu R, Miller CL, Kim JB, Arora K, Carcamo-Oribe I, Xiong Y, Tellakula N, Nanda V, Murthy N, Boisvert WA, Hedin U, Perisic L, Aldi S, Maegdefessel L, Pjanic M, Owens GK, Tallquist MD, Quertermous T.. Coronary artery disease associated transcription factor TCF21 regulates smooth muscle precursor cells that contribute to the fibrous cap. PLoS Genet 2015;11:e1005155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dobnikar L, Taylor AL, Chappell J, Oldach P, Harman JL, Oerton E, Dzierzak E, Bennett MR, Spivakov M, Jorgensen HF.. Disease-relevant transcriptional signatures identified in individual smooth muscle cells from healthy mouse vessels. Nat Commun 2018;9:4567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wirka RC, Wagh D, Paik DT, Pjanic M, Nguyen T, Miller CL, Kundu R, Nagao M, Coller J, Koyano TK, Fong R, Woo YJ, Liu B, Montgomery SB, Wu JC, Zhu K, Chang R, Alamprese M, Tallquist MD, Kim JB, Quertermous T.. Atheroprotective roles of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation and the TCF21 disease gene as revealed by single-cell analysis. Nat Med 2019;25:1280–1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alencar GF, Owsiany KM, K S, Sukhavasi K, Mocci G, Nguyen A, Williams CM, Shamsuzzaman S, Mokry M, Henderson CA, Haskins R, Baylis RA, Finn AV, McNamara CA, Zunder ER, Venkata V, Pasterkamp G, Bjorkegren J, Bekiranov S, Owens GK.. The stem cell pluripotency genes Klf4 and Oct4 regulate complex SMC phenotypic changes critical in late-stage atherosclerotic lesion pathogenesis. Circulation 2020;142:2045–2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pan H, Xue C, Auerbach BJ, Fan J, Bashore AC, Cui J, Yang DY, Trignano SB, Liu W, Shi J, Ihuegbu CO, Bush EC, Worley J, Vlahos L, Laise P, Solomon RA, Connolly ES, Califano A, Sims PA, Zhang H, Li M, Reilly MP.. Single-cell genomics reveals a novel cell state during smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching and potential therapeutic targets foratherosclerosis in mouse and human. Circulation 2020;142:2060–2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Depuydt MAC, Prange KHM, Slenders L, Ord T, Elbersen D, Boltjes A, de Jager SCA, Asselbergs FW, de Borst GJ, Aavik E, Lonnberg T, Lutgens E, Glass CK, den Ruijter HM, Kaikkonen MU, Bot I, Slutter B, van der Laan SW, Yla-Herttuala S, Mokry M, Kuiper J, de Winther MPJ, Pasterkamp G.. Microanatomy of the human atherosclerotic plaque by single-cell transcriptomics. Circ Res 2020;127:1437–1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ikari Y, McManus BM, Kenyon J, Schwartz SM.. Neonatal intima formation in the human coronary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:2036–2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adams LD, Geary RL, Li J, Rossini A, Schwartz SM.. Expression profiling identifies smooth muscle cell diversity within human intima and plaque fibrous cap: loss of RGS5 distinguishes the cap. ATVB 2006;26:319–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Allahverdian S, Chaabane C, Boukais K, Francis GA, Bochaton-Piallat ML.. Smooth muscle cell fate and plasticity in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:540–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Basatemur GL, Jorgensen HF, Clarke MCH, Bennett MR, Mallat Z.. Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019;16:727–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Manderson JA, Mosse PR, Safstrom JA, Young SB, Campbell GR.. Balloon catheter injury to rabbit carotid artery. I. Changes in smooth muscle phenotype. Arteriosclerosis 1989;9:289–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Röhl S, Rykaczewska U, Seime T, Suur BE, Gonzalez Diez M, Gådin JR, Gainullina A, Sergushichev AA, Wirka R, Lengquist M, Kronqvist M, Bergman O, Odeberg J, Lindeman JHN, Quertermous T, Hamsten A, Eriksson P, Hedin U, Razuvaev A, Perisic Matic L.. Transcriptomic profiling of experimental arterial injury reveals new mechanisms and temporal dynamics in vascular healing response. JVS-VS 2020;1:13–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Y, Dubland JA, Allahverdian S, Asonye E, Sahin B, Jaw JE, Sin DD, Seidman MA, Leeper NJ, Francis GA.. Smooth muscle cells contribute the majority of foam cells in ApoE (Apolipoprotein E)-deficient mouse atherosclerosis. ATVB 2019;39:876–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maguire EM, Pearce SWA, Xiao Q.. Foam cell formation: a new target for fighting atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Vascul Pharmacol 2019;112:54–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Klouche M, Rose-John S, Schmiedt W, Bhakdi S.. Enzymatically degraded, nonoxidized LDL induces human vascular smooth muscle cell activation, foam cell transformation, and proliferation. Circulation 2000;101:1799–1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kedi X, Ming Y, Yongping W, Yi Y, Xiaoxiang Z.. Free cholesterol overloading induced smooth muscle cells death and activated both ER- and mitochondrial-dependent death pathway. Atherosclerosis 2009;207:123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pi S, Mao L, Chen J, Shi H, Liu Y, Guo X, Li Y, Zhou L, He H, Yu C, Liu J, Dang Y, Xia Y, He Q, Li JH, Hu Y, Miao Y, Yue Y, Hu ZB.. The P2RY12 receptor promotes VSMC-derived foam cell formation by inhibiting autophagy in advanced atherosclerosis. Autophagy 2020;1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rong JX, Shapiro M, Trogan E, Fisher EA.. Transdifferentiation of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells to a macrophage-like state after cholesterol loading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13531–13536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vengrenyuk Y, Nishi H, Long X, Ouimet M, Savji N, Martinez FO, Cassella CP, Moore KJ, Ramsey SA, Miano JM, Fisher EA.. Cholesterol loading reprograms the microRNA-143/145-myocardin axis to convert aortic smooth muscle cells to a dysfunctional macrophage-like phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35:535–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Davies JD, Carpenter KL, Challis IR, Figg NL, McNair R, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, Shanahan CM.. Adipocytic differentiation and liver x receptor pathways regulate the accumulation of triacylglycerols in human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2005;280:3911–3919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nguyen Dinh Cat A, Briones AM, Callera GE, Yogi A, He Y, Montezano AC, Touyz RM.. Adipocyte-derived factors regulate vascular smooth muscle cells through mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors. Hypertension 2011;58:479–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nicoll R, Henein MY.. The predictive value of arterial and valvular calcification for mortality and cardiovascular events.Int J Cardiol Heart Vessel 2014;3:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shanahan CM, Crouthamel MH, Kapustin A, Giachelli CM.. Arterial calcification in chronic kidney disease: key roles for calcium and phosphate. Circ Res 2011;109:697–711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Durham AL, Speer MY, Scatena M, Giachelli CM, Shanahan CM.. Role of smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification: implications in atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:590–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Naik V, Leaf EM, Hu JH, Yang HY, Nguyen NB, Giachelli CM, Speer MY.. Sources of cells that contribute to atherosclerotic intimal calcification: an in vivo genetic fate mapping study. Cardiovasc Res 2012;94:545–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kapustin AN, Chatrou ML, Drozdov I, Zheng Y, Davidson SM, Soong D, Furmanik M, Sanchis P, De Rosales RT, Alvarez-Hernandez D, Shroff R, Yin X, Muller K, Skepper JN, Mayr M, Reutelingsperger CP, Chester A, Bertazzo S, Schurgers LJ, Shanahan CM.. Vascular smooth muscle cell calcification is mediated by regulated exosome secretion. Circ Res 2015;116:1312–1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schurgers LJ, Akbulut AC, Kaczor DM, Halder M, Koenen RR, Kramann R.. Initiation and propagation of vascular calcification is regulated by a concert of platelet- and smooth muscle cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018;5:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vengrenyuk Y, Carlier S, Xanthos S, Cardoso L, Ganatos P, Virmani R, Einav S, Gilchrist L, Weinbaum S.. A hypothesis for vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcifications in thin fibrous caps.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:14678–14683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rattazzi M, Bennett BJ, Bea F, Kirk EA, Ricks JL, Speer M, Schwartz SM, Giachelli CM, Rosenfeld ME.. Calcification of advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the innominate arteries of ApoE-deficient mice: potential role of chondrocyte-like cells. ATVB 2005;25:1420–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Reutelingsperger C, Schurgers L.. Coronary artery calcification: ajanus-faced biomarker? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1324–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Patel JJ, Bourne LE, Davies BK, Arnett TR, MacRae VE, Wheeler-Jones CP, Orriss IR.. Differing calcification processes in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and osteoblasts. Exp Cell Res 2019;380:100–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang H, Yan S, Chai H, Riha GM, Li M, Yao Q, Chen C.. Shear stress induces endothelial transdifferentiation from mouse smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;346:860–865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hong X, Margariti A, Le Bras A, Jacquet L, Kong W, Hu Y, Xu Q.. Transdifferentiated human vascular smooth muscle cells are a new potential cell source for endothelial regeneration. Sci Rep 2017;7:5590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Michel JB, Virmani R, Arbustini E, Pasterkamp G.. Intraplaque haemorrhages as the trigger of plaque vulnerability. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1977–1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Majesky MW, Horita H, Ostriker A, Lu S, Regan JN, Bagchi A, Dong XR, Poczobutt J, Nemenoff RA, Weiser-Evans MC.. Differentiated smooth muscle cells generate a subpopulation of resident vascular progenitor cells in the adventitia regulated by Klf4. Circ Res 2017;120:296–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mack CP.Signaling mechanisms that regulate smooth muscle cell differentiation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:1495–1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gomez D, Swiatlowska P, Owens GK.. Epigenetic control of smooth muscle cell identity and lineage memory. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35:2508–2516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Maegdefessel L, Rayner KJ, Leeper NJ.. MicroRNA regulation of vascular smooth muscle function and phenotype: early career committee contribution. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35:2–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yoshida T, Sinha S, Dandre F, Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Kremer BE, Wang DZ, Olson EN, Owens GK.. Myocardin is a key regulator of CArG-dependent transcription of multiple smooth muscle marker genes. Circ Res 2003;92:856–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Li S, Wang DZ, Wang Z, Richardson JA, Olson EN.. The serum response factor coactivator myocardin is required for vascular smooth muscle development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:9366–9370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yoshida T, Hayashi M.. Role of Kruppel-like factor 4 and its binding proteins in vascular disease. JAT 2014;21:402–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yoshida T, Yamashita M, Hayashi M.. Kruppel-like factor 4 contributes to high phosphate-induced phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells into osteogenic cells. J Biol Chem 2012;287:25706–25714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cherepanova OA, Gomez D, Shankman LS, Swiatlowska P, Williams J, Sarmento OF, Alencar GF, Hess DL, Bevard MH, Greene ES, Murgai M, Turner SD, Geng YJ, Bekiranov S, Connelly JJ, Tomilin A, Owens GK.. Activation of the pluripotency factor OCT4 in smooth muscle cells is atheroprotective. Nat Med 2016;22:657–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nagao M, Lyu Q, Zhao Q, Wirka RC, Bagga J, Nguyen T, Cheng P, Kim JB, Pjanic M, Miano JM, Quertermous T.. Coronary disease-associated gene TCF21 inhibits smooth muscle cell differentiation by blocking the myocardin-serum response factor pathway. Circ Res 2020;126:517–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yoshida T, Yamashita M, Horimai C, Hayashi M.. Smooth muscle-selective inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB attenuates smooth muscle phenotypic switching and neointima formation following vascular injury. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yang X, Gong Y, Tang Y, Li H, He Q, Gower L, Liaw L, Friesel RE.. Spry1 and Spry4 differentially regulate human aortic smooth muscle cell phenotype via Akt/FoxO/myocardin signaling. PLoS One 2013;8:e58746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Boettger T, Beetz N, Kostin S, Schneider J, Kruger M, Hein L, Braun T.. Acquisition of the contractile phenotype by murine arterial smooth muscle cells depends on the Mir143/145 gene cluster. J Clin Invest 2009;119:2634–2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cordes KR, Sheehy NT, White MP, Berry EC, Morton SU, Muth AN, Lee TH, Miano JM, Ivey KN, Srivastava D.. miR-145 and miR-143 regulate smooth muscle cell fate and plasticity. Nature 2009;460:705–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Xie C, Huang H, Sun X, Guo Y, Hamblin M, Ritchie RP, Garcia-Barrio MT, Zhang J, Chen YE.. MicroRNA-1 regulates smooth muscle cell differentiation by repressing Kruppel-like factor 4. Stem Cells Dev 2011;20:205–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu X, Cheng Y, Zhang S, Lin Y, Yang J, Zhang C.. A necessary role of miR-221 and miR-222 in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia.Circ Res 2009;104:476–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Davis BN, Hilyard AC, Nguyen PH, Lagna G, Hata A.. Induction of microRNA-221 by platelet-derived growth factor signaling is critical for modulation of vascular smooth muscle phenotype. J Biol Chem 2009;284:3728–3738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mackenzie NC, Staines KA, Zhu D, Genever P, Macrae VE.. miRNA-221 and miRNA-222 synergistically function to promote vascular calcification. Cell Biochem Funct 2014;32:209–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Yang G, Pei Y, Cao Q, Wang R.. MicroRNA-21 represses human cystathionine gamma-lyase expression by targeting at specificity protein-1 in smooth muscle cells. J Cell Physiol 2012;227:3192–3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tang Y, Yu S, Liu Y, Zhang J, Han L, Xu Z.. MicroRNA-124 controls human vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switch via Sp1. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2017;313:H641–H649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Mahmoud AD, Ballantyne MD, Miscianinov V, Pinel K, Hung J, Scanlon JP, Iyinikkel J, Kaczynski J, Tavares AS, Bradshaw AC, Mills NL, Newby DE, Caporali A, Gould GW, George SJ, Ulitsky I, Sluimer JC, Rodor J, Baker AH.. The human-specific and smooth muscle cell-enriched LncRNA SMILR promotes proliferation by regulating mitotic CENPF mRNA and drives cell-cycle progression which can be targeted to limit vascular remodeling. Circ Res 2019;125:535–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Song TF, Huang LW, Yuan Y, Wang HQ, He HP, Ma WJ, Huo LH, Zhou H, Wang N, Zhang TC.. LncRNA MALAT1 regulates smooth muscle cell phenotype switch via activation of autophagy. Oncotarget 2018;9:4411–4426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yu CK, Xu T, Assoian RK, Rader DJ.. Mining the stiffness-sensitive transcriptome in human vascular smooth muscle cells identifies long noncoding RNA stiffness regulators. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2018;38:164–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Manabe I, Owens GK.. Recruitment of serum response factor and hyperacetylation of histones at smooth muscle-specific regulatory regions during differentiation of a novel P19-derived in vitro smooth muscle differentiation system. Circ Res 2001;88:1127–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cao D, Wang Z, Zhang CL, Oh J, Xing W, Li S, Richardson JA, Wang DZ, Olson EN.. Modulation of smooth muscle gene expression by association of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases with myocardin.MCB 2005;25:364–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Salmon M, Gomez D, Greene E, Shankman L, Owens GK.. Cooperative binding of KLF4, pELK-1, and HDAC2 to a G/C repressor element in the SM22alpha promoter mediates transcriptional silencing during SMC phenotypic switching in vivo. Circ Res 2012;111:685–696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Natarajan R.Drugs targeting epigenetic histone acetylation in vascular smooth muscle cells for restenosis and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:725–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.McDonald OG, Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Owens GK.. Control of SRF binding to CArG box chromatin regulates smooth muscle gene expression in vivo. J Clin Invest 2005;116:36–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wang Z, Wang DZ, Hockemeyer D, McAnally J, Nordheim A, Olson EN.. Myocardin and ternary complex factors compete for SRF to control smooth muscle gene expression. Nature 2004;428:185–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Deaton RA, Gan Q, Owens GK.. Sp1-dependent activation of KLF4 is required for PDGF-BB-induced phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;296:H1027–H1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tsaousi A, Mill C, George SJ.. The Wnt pathways in vascular disease: lessons from vascular development. Curr Opin Lipidol 2011;22:350–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cai T, Sun D, Duan Y, Wen P, Dai C, Yang J, He W.. WNT/beta-catenin signaling promotes VSMCs to osteogenic transdifferentiation and calcification through directly modulating Runx2 gene expression. Exp Cell Res 2016;345:206–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Qiu P, Feng XH, Li L.. Interaction of Smad3 and SRF-associated complex mediates TGF-beta1 signals to regulate SM22 transcription during myofibroblast differentiation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2003;35:1407–1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Davis-Dusenbery BN, Chan MC, Reno KE, Weisman AS, Layne MD, Lagna G, Hata A.. down-regulation of Kruppel-like factor-4 (KLF4) by microRNA-143/145 is critical for modulation of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype by transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein 4. J Biol Chem 2011;286:28097–28110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gomez D, Owens GK.. Smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res 2012;95:156–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Webster WS, Bishop SP, Geer JC.. Experimental aortic intimal thickening. I. Morphology and source of intimal cells. Am J Pathol 1974;76:245–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bennett MR, Macdonald K, Chan SW, Boyle JJ, Weissberg PL.. Cooperative interactions between RB and p53 regulate cell proliferation, cell senescence, and apoptosis in human vascular smooth muscle cells from atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res 1998;82:704–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Gordon D, Reidy MA, Benditt EP, Schwartz SM.. Cell proliferation in human coronary arteries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:4600–4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Coppe JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J.. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression.Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 2010;5:99–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Matthews C, Gorenne I, Scott S, Figg N, Kirkpatrick P, Ritchie A, Goddard M, Bennett M.. Vascular smooth muscle cells undergo telomere-based senescence in human atherosclerosis: effects of telomerase and oxidative stress. Circ Res 2006;99:156–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wang J, Uryga AK, Reinhold J, Figg N, Baker L, Finigan A, Gray K, Kumar S, Clarke M, Bennett M.. Vascular smooth muscle cell senescence promotes atherosclerosis and features of plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2015;132:1909–1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hamczyk MR, Villa-Bellosta R, Gonzalo P, Andrés-Manzano MJ, Nogales P, Bentzon JF, López-Otín C, Andrés V.. Vascular smooth muscle-specific progerin expression accelerates atherosclerosis and death in a mouse model of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Circulation 2018;138:266–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Gardner SE, Humphry M, Bennett MR, Clarke MC.. Senescent vascular smooth muscle cells drive inflammation through an interleukin-1alpha-dependent senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35:1963–1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Nakano-Kurimoto R, Ikeda K, Uraoka M, Nakagawa Y, Yutaka K, Koide M, Takahashi T, Matoba S, Yamada H, Okigaki M, Matsubara H.. Replicative senescence of vascular smooth muscle cells enhances the calcification through initiating the osteoblastic transition. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;297:H1673–H1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Han L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Guo L, Wang J, Zeng F, Xu D, Yin Z, Xu Y, Wang D, Zhou H.. Interleukin-1beta-induced senescence promotes osteoblastic transition of vascular smooth muscle cells. Kidney Blood Press Res 2020;45:314–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Barallobre-Barreiro J, Loeys B, Mayr M, Rienks M, Verstraeten A, Kovacic JC.. Extracellular matrix in vascular disease, Part 2/4: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2189–2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Johnson JL.Metalloproteinases in atherosclerosis.Eur J Pharmacol 2017;816:93–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Langley SR, Willeit K, Didangelos A, Matic LP, Skroblin P, Barallobre-Barreiro J, Lengquist M, Rungger G, Kapustin A, Kedenko L, Molenaar C, Lu R, Barwari T, Suna G, Yin X, Iglseder B, Paulweber B, Willeit P, Shalhoub J, Pasterkamp G, Davies AH, Monaco C, Hedin U, Shanahan CM, Willeit J, Kiechl S, Mayr M.. Extracellular matrix proteomics identifies molecular signature of symptomatic carotid plaques. J Clin Invest 2017;127:1546–1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Herrington DM, Mao C, Parker SJ, Fu Z, Yu G, Chen L, Venkatraman V, Fu Y, Wang Y, Howard TD, Jun G, Zhao CF, Liu Y, Saylor G, Spivia WR, Athas GB, Troxclair D, Hixson JE, Vander Heide RS, Wang Y, Van Eyk JE.. Proteomic architecture of human coronary and aortic atherosclerosis.Circulation 2018;137:2741–2756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wierer M, Prestel M, Schiller HB, Yan G, Schaab C, Azghandi S, Werner J, Kessler T, Malik R, Murgia M, Aherrahrou Z, Schunkert H, Dichgans M, Mann M.. Compartment-resolved proteomic analysis of mouse aorta during atherosclerotic plaque formation reveals osteoclast-specific protein expression. Mol Cell Proteomics 2018;17:321–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Rocchiccioli S, Cecchettini A, Ucciferri N, Terreni M, Viglione F, Trivella MG, Citti L, Parodi O, Pelosi G.. Site-specific secretome map evidences VSMC-related markers of coronary atherosclerosis grade and extent in the hypercholesterolemic swine. Dis Markers 2015;2015:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Orr AW, Hastings NE, Blackman BR, Wamhoff BR.. Complex regulation and function of the inflammatory smooth muscle cell phenotype in atherosclerosis. J Vasc Res 2010;47:168–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Franceschi C, Campisi J.. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:S4–S9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Prata L, Ovsyannikova IG, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL.. Senescent cell clearance by the immune system: emerging therapeutic opportunities. Semin Immunol 2018;40:101275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Douma S, van Doorn R, Desmet CJ, Aarden LA, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS.. Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network. Cell 2008;133:1019–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Acosta JC, Banito A, Wuestefeld T, Georgilis A, Janich P, Morton JP, Athineos D, Kang TW, Lasitschka F, Andrulis M, Pascual G, Morris KJ, Khan S, Jin H, Dharmalingam G, Snijders AP, Carroll T, Capper D, Pritchard C, Inman GJ, Longerich T, Sansom OJ, Benitah SA, Zender L, Gil J.. A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence. Nat Cell Biol 2013;15:978–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Borghesan M, Fafián-Labora J, Eleftheriadou O, Carpintero-Fernández P, Paez-Ribes M, Vizcay-Barrena G, Swisa A, Kolodkin-Gal D, Ximénez-Embún P, Lowe R, Martín-Martín B, Peinado H, Muñoz J, Fleck RA, Dor Y, Ben-Porath I, Vossenkamper A, Muñoz-Espin D, O’Loghlen A.. Small extracellular vesicles are key regulators of non-cell autonomous intercellular communication in senescence via the interferon protein IFITM3. Cell Rep 2019;27:3956–3971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zuccolo E, Badi I, Scavello F, Gambuzza I, Mancinelli L, Macri F, Tedesco CC, Veglia F, Bonfigli AR, Olivieri F, Raucci A.. The microRNA-34a-induced senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) favors vascular smooth muscle cells calcification. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:4454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Mosteiro L, Pantoja C, Alcazar N, Marión RM, Chondronasiou D, Rovira M, Fernandez-Marcos PJ, Muñoz-Martin M, Blanco-Aparicio C, Pastor J, Gómez-López G, De Martino A, Blasco MA, Abad M, Serrano M.. Tissue damage and senescence provide critical signals for cellular reprogramming in vivo. Science 2016;354:aaf4445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Raposo G, Stoorvogel W.. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 2013;200:373–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Quesenberry PJ, Aliotta J, Deregibus MC, Camussi G.. Role of extracellular RNA-carrying vesicles in cell differentiation and reprogramming. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015;6:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Kapustin AN, Shanahan CM.. Emerging roles for vascular smooth muscle cell exosomes in calcification and coagulation.J Physiol 2016;594:2905–2914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Hegyi L, Bennett MR, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL.. Apoptosis regulates human vascular calcification in vitro: evidence for initiation of vascular calcification by apoptotic bodies. Circ Res 2000;87:1055–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Basisty N, Kale A, Jeon OH, Kuehnemann C, Payne T, Rao C, Holtz A, Shah S, Sharma V, Ferrucci L, Campisi J, Schilling B.. A proteomic atlas of senescence-associated secretomes for aging biomarker development.PLoS Biol 2020;18:e3000599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Takasugi M.Emerging roles of extracellular vesicles in cellular senescence and aging.Aging Cell 2018;17:e12734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Grootaert MOJ, Moulis M, Roth L, Martinet W, Vindis C, Bennett MR, De Meyer GRY.. Vascular smooth muscle cell death, autophagy and senescence in atherosclerosis.Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:622–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Coornaert I, Hofmans S, Devisscher L, Augustyns K, Van Der Veken P, De Meyer GRY, Martinet W.. Novel drug discovery strategies for atherosclerosis that target necrosis and necroptosis. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2018;13:477–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Kockx MM, De Meyer GR, Muhring J, Jacob W, Bult H, Herman AG.. Apoptosis and related proteins in different stages of human atherosclerotic plaques.Circulation 1998;97:2307–2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Bauriedel G, Hutter R, Welsch U, Bach R, Sievert H, Luderitz B.. Role of smooth muscle cell death in advanced coronary primary lesions: implications for plaque instability. Cardiovasc Res 1999;41:480–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Figg NL, Bennett MR.. Quantification of apoptosis in mouse atherosclerotic lesions.Methods Mol Biol 2015;1339:191–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Clarke MC, Littlewood TD, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Bennett MR.. Chronic apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells accelerates atherosclerosis and promotes calcification and medial degeneration. Circ Res 2008;102:1529–1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Clarke MC, Talib S, Figg NL, Bennett MR.. Vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis induces interleukin-1-directed inflammation: effects of hyperlipidemia-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis. Circ Res 2010;106:363–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Howe LJ, Dudbridge F, Schmidt AF, Finan C, Denaxas S, Asselbergs FW, Hingorani AD, Patel RS.. Polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease and subsequent event risk amongst established cases. Hum Mol Genet 2020;29:1388–1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Turner AW, Wong D, Dreisbach CN, Miller CL.. GWAS reveal targets in vessel wall pathways to treat coronary artery disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018;5:72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Jarinova O, Stewart AF, Roberts R, Wells G, Lau P, Naing T, Buerki C, McLean BW, Cook RC, Parker JS, McPherson R.. Functional analysis of the chromosome 9p21.3 coronary artery disease risk locus. ATVB 2009;29:1671–1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Miller CL, Anderson DR, Kundu RK, Raiesdana A, Nurnberg ST, Diaz R, Cheng K, Leeper NJ, Chen CH, Chang IS, Schadt EE, Hsiung CA, Assimes TL, Quertermous T.. Disease-related growth factor and embryonic signaling pathways modulate an enhancer of TCF21 expression at the 6q23.2 coronary heart disease locus. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Liu B, Pjanic M, Wang T, Nguyen T, Gloudemans M, Rao A, Castano VG, Nurnberg S, Rader DJ, Elwyn S, Ingelsson E, Montgomery SB, Miller CL, Quertermous T.. Genetic regulatory mechanisms of smooth muscle cells map to coronary artery disease risk loci. Am J Hum Genet 2018;103:377–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zhao Q, Wirka R, Nguyen T, Nagao M, Cheng P, Miller CL, Kim JB, Pjanic M, Quertermous T.. TCF21 and AP-1 interact through epigenetic modifications to regulate coronary artery disease gene expression. Genome Med 2019;11:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wong D, Turner AW, Miller CL.. Genetic insights into smooth muscle cell contributions to coronary artery disease.ATVB 2019;39:1006–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Argmann CA, Edwards JY, Sawyez CG, O'Neil CH, Hegele RA, Pickering JG, Huff MW.. Regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux through hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition: a role for RhoA in ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux. J Biol Chem 2005;280:22212–22221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Puri R, Nicholls SJ, Shao M, Kataoka Y, Uno K, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Nissen SE.. Impact of statins on serial coronary calcification during atheroma progression and regression. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1273–1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Mahmoudi M, Gorenne I, Mercer J, Figg N, Littlewood T, Bennett M.. Statins use a novel Nijmegen breakage syndrome-1-dependent pathway to accelerate DNA repair in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 2008;103:717–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ferri N, Marchiano S, Tibolla G, Baetta R, Dhyani A, Ruscica M, Uboldi P, Catapano AL, Corsini A.. PCSK9 knock-out mice are protected from neointimal formation in response to perivascular carotid collar placement. Atherosclerosis 2016;253:214–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



