Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;17(3):743–760. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1731270

Table 1.

Effects of AlloP on the NFLT, NDS, and density of damaged cells in the GCL

Condition NFLT vs. RT (%) [p value vs. 75 mm Hg] NDS [p] Damaged cells in GCL [p]
10 mm Hg
[reference]
1.5 ± 0.7 0.2 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 1.8
75 mm Hg
[-]
11.4 ± 1.9
[-]
0.8 ± 0.4
[-]
17.0 ± 5.0
[-]
75 mm Hg + AlloP
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
1.5 ± 0.6
[*p < 0.05]
0.2 ± 0.4
[p > 0.05]
2.0 ± 1.7
[*p < 0.05]
75 mm Hg + AlloP +Picro
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
4.0 ± 2.6
[*p < 0.05]
3.1 ± 0.8
[*p < 0.05]
23.9 ± 6.6
[p > 0.05]
75 mm Hg + Rapa
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
1.7 ± 0.5
[*p < 0.05]
0.3 ± 0.5
[p > 0.05]
6.9 ± 2.1
[*p < 0.05]
75 mm Hg + Torin 2
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
1.8 ± 0.6
[*p < 0.05]
0.2 ± 0.4
[p > 0.05]
8.1 ± 1.9
[*p < 0.05]
75 mm Hg + AlloP +Baf
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
5.3 ± 1.4
[*p < 0.05]
3.2 ± 1.3
[*p < 0.05]
30.4 ± 8.2
[*p < 0.05]
75 mm Hg + AlloP + SAR405
[vs. 75 mm Hg]
6.4 ± 2.0
[p > 0.05]
3.4 ± 1.0
[*p < 0.05]
36.9 ± 6.9
[*p < 0.05]

Data are mean ± SD. NFLT vs. retinal thickness (RT) (%) refers to the NFLT percentage of total RT. The density of damaged cells in the GCL was counted per 250 μm of retina. P values in each parameter were calculated by Tukey’s test vs. 75 mm Hg (see Source data of Table 1).