Figure 3.
EA intervention modulates the activity of L5PN apical spines
(A) Schematic diagrams showing experimental timelines in (B–H), similar with those in Figure 2A.
(B) Top, representative apical dendrites (DS) and spines (S1 to S5) under two-photon imaging. Scale bar, 2 μm. Bottom, recording traces of Ca2+ activities after normalization (ΔF/F0). Pink shades indicate high levels of synchronization among spines on the same dendritic branch.
(C and D) Total integrated Ca2+ activities of apical spines. (C) Bar chart showing averaged total integrated Ca2+ activities (sham CCI: 118.9 ± 3.91, CCI: 250.3 ± 28.09, CCI + EA: 175.8 ± 4.13, CCI + sham EA: 202.1 ± 6.04; Kruskal-Wallis test statistic = 140.5, p < 0.001; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 using Dunn's post-hoc comparison; ns, no significant difference; n = 89, 163, 167, and 151 spines, N = 4, 5, 6, and 4 animals for sham CCI, CCI, CCI + EA, and CCI + sham EA group, respectively). (D) The frequency distribution of total integrated Ca2+ activities.
(E and F) Spike numbers per minute of Ca2+ transients. (E) Averaged Ca2+ spike frequency (sham CCI: 1.38 ± 0.07, CCI: 2.71 ± 0.12, CCI + EA: 1.59 ± 0.05, CCI + sham EA: 3.13 ± 0.16; Kruskal-Wallis test statistic = 131.0, p < 0.001; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 using Dunn's post-hoc comparison; ns, no significant difference; n = 82, 161, 158, and 116 spines, N = 4, 5, 6, and 4 animals for sham CCI, CCI, CCI + EA, and CCI + sham EA group, respectively). (F) The frequency distribution of Ca2+ spike frequency.
(G and H) Peak values of Ca2+ spikes. (G) Averaged Ca2+ peak values (sham CCI: 216.1 ± 15.01, CCI: 336.4 ± 14.52, CCI + EA: 312.1 ± 14.52 CCI + sham EA: 263.9 ± 11.19; Kruskal-Wallis test statistic = 46.66, p < 0.001; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 using Dunn's post-hoc comparison; ns, no significant difference; n = 100, 201, 192, and 138 spines, N = 4, 5, 6, and 4 animals for sham CCI, CCI, CCI + EA, and CCI + sham EA group, respectively). (H) Histogram showing the frequency distribution of Ca2+ peak values. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
