Table 3.
Comparison of the seven methods
| Isolation methods | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Differential centrifugation with addition of 30% sucrose buffer solution |
High yield Slightly lower contamination |
Time-consuming |
| Precipitation | High separation |
Low purification rate Long cycle |
| Flushing separation | Saves time and cost | wash off some exosomes [30] |
| Ultrafiltration |
No chemical reagent contamination Stable structure |
Mixed with other particles of similar size [31–34] |
| Immunomagnetic bead method | High specificity easy operation | Easily affected by pH and salt concentration [11, 35–41] |
| Microfluidic separation | Small sample requirements, efficient and simple |
Lack of standardised clinical samples and large-scale experiments; |
| Mass spectrometry | Good reproducibility, low sample consumption, stable test results | High cost [44, 45] |