Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2019 Nov 29;19(2):637–649. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0330

Figure 3. Identification of cells that are sensitive to FAK and HDAC inhibitor combinations.

Figure 3

A, Nuclei counts of A549 (left) and Flo1 (right) cells following treatment with vorinostat (5 μM), panobinostat (7.5 nM), and VS-4718 (500 nM) for 24 hours. Data are normalized to DMSO values and are displayed as mean ± SEM (n = 2 independent experiments). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (two-way ANOVA). B, Combined inhibition of FAK and HDAC blocks colony formation. Representative images are shown (top). Bar charts (bottom) are plotted as means ± SEM (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). C, Combination of FAK and HDAC inhibition reduces cell viability. Dose matrices of viability of A549 (top) and Flo1 (bottom) cells following treatment with vorinostat (μM; left) or panobinostat (nM; right). D, Cell cycle distribution in A549 (left) and Flo1 (right) cells following treatment with the same drugs as used in B for 24 hours. Results in C and D are displayed as means (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). E, FAK and HDAC inhibition enhances the induction of apoptosis in A549 (left) and Flo1 (right) cells. Bar charts are plotted as means ± SEM (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). F, Combination of panobinostat and VS-4718 inhibits A549 (left) or Flo1 (right) tumor growth. Tumor volumes are plotted as means ± SEM [n ≥ 4 mice per group (2 tumors per mouse)]. Mice were treated from day 0 and accompanying body weights are shown (mean ± SD). For B, E, and F, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).