Abstract
The chemical synthesis of lysophospholipids often involves multiple synthetic and chromatographic steps due to the incorporation of the fatty acyl group onto the glycerol scaffold early in the synthesis. We report herein a new protocol for the lysophosphatidylation of alcohols and its application to the synthesis of lysophospholipid conjugates of TLR7/8-active imidazoquinoline 3. This new procedure, which is based on the tin-mediated regioselective acylation of late-stage phosphoglycerol intermediate 17, overcomes many of the drawbacks of conventional lysophosphatidylation methods and allows introduction of different fatty acyl groups in the penultimate step.
Keywords: TLR7/8, imidazoquinoline, lysophospholipids
Graphical Abstract
The immune stimulating ability of certain antiviral/antitumor 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolines1 such as imiquimod (1, R-837; Fig. 1), which is marketed in the USA as Aldara® and Zyclara®, has been attributed primarily to the activation of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 in plasmacytoid dentritic cells (DCs) and B cells and the induction of type I interferons (IFN-α/β) and IFN-regulated cytokines.2 The structurally related imidazoquinoline resiquimod (2, R-848) is also a ligand for TLR7 on human cells, but—in marked contrast to imiquimod—potently activates TLR8 on myeloid and monocyte-derived DCs, leading to production of proinflammatory cytokines. Since TLR7 and TLR8 are broadly expressed in DCs and other antigen presenting cells, TLR7/8 agonists may be especially useful as adjuvants in human vaccines.3,4 However, both oral and topical preparations of imiquimod (1) and resiquimod (2) and other small-molecule TLR7/8 agonists can exhibit serious side effects.5 Further, since TLR7 and TLR8 receptors are located in endosomal/lysosomal compartments,6 cellular uptake is prerequisite for cellular activation by TLR7/8 ligands. Thus, strategies that would increase the penetration of the TLR7/8 ligand into DCs and reduce toxicity are of great interest. Lipid conjugation of nucleoside drugs7 is one useful strategy for membrane targeting and intracellular delivery, and is known to decrease toxic side effects, as well as facilitate incorporation of the nucleolipid into liposomes and other biodegradable nanoparticle formulations.
Figure 1.
Structures of TLR7/8-active imidazoquinolines and lysophospholipid conjugate 4
To our knowledge, the effect of conjugating small-molecule TLR7/8 agonists to lysophospholipids on immune cell activation has not been investigated. We were particularly interested in the synthesis of lysophospholipid conjugates of TLR7/8-active imidazoquinolines possessing different acyl groups to evaluate the effect of fatty acid structure on immunostimulatory activity. Varying the nature of the acyl chain in this phospholipid class should permit optimization of a particular formulation and route of administration.
The synthesis of lysophospholipids often involves multiple synthetic and chromatographic steps due to the introduction of the fatty acyl group onto the glycerol scaffold early in the synthesis and the potential for intramolecular acyl group migration. While acyl migration leading to regioisomers and other by-products has been mitigated by orthogonal protection of the sn-2- and sn-3-glycerol positions,8–10 these multi-step approaches preclude the use of a common advanced intermediate (CAI) and the introduction of different acyl groups near the end of the synthesis. Herein, we describe an efficient synthesis of lysophosphatidyl derivatives of imidazoquinoline 3 via regioselective tin-mediated mono-acylation of the sn-1-position of a late-stage phosphoglycerol CAI with different acid chlorides in the penultimate step. Imidazoquinoline 3 was selected as a test compound for initial phospholipidation studies due to its known TLR7/8 activity and simplified structure relative to resiquimod 2.
To demonstrate that lysophosphatidyl derivatives of imidazoquinoline 3 are isolable and stable, we first carried out the synthesis of lysophospholipids 5 and 6 using a known orthogonal protection strategy starting from 3-p-toluenesulfonyl-sn-glycerol (7)10 and employing a one-pot, two-step phosphitylation reaction recently developed in our laboratory to install the lysophosphatidyl group (Scheme 1). Accordingly, monoacyl glycerols 8 and 9, prepared in 3 steps from 7, were treated with 2-cyanoethyl N,N,N',N'-tetraisopropylphosphordiamidite in the presence of tetrazole to give the corresponding glycerol phosphoramidites (not isolated), which were reacted in situ with imidazoquinoline 3 in the presence of imidazolium triflate (Im-OTf) to afford the desired phosphite intermediates 10 and 11 in 97% and 73% yield, respectively after chromatographic purification. Subsequent oxidation of phosphites 10 and 11 to the corresponding phosphates with t-butyl peroxide and sequential removal of the cyanoethyl and tetrahydropyranyl (THP) protecting groups provided the desired lysonucleolipids 5 and 6 in 66% and 52% yield, respectively after chromatography. Reversing the order in which the protecting groups are removed leads to the regeneration of starting material 3, presumably via initial intramolecular attack of the sn-2-hydroxyl group on the phosphotriester moiety. In this way, lysophospholipids 5 and 6 could be prepared in 8 steps and 19–33% overall yield from known tosyl glycerol 7 using the linear synthetic route shown in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Reagents and conditions: (a) RCO2H, DCC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt; (b) dihydropyran, p-TsOH, CH2Cl2, rt; (c) (i) CH3OCH2CO2 −Bu4N+, CH3CN, rt, (ii) t-BuNH2, CHCl3, CH3OH, 0 °C, 52% (R=n-C15H31), 49% (R=C17H33); (d) (i) 1H-tetrazole, (i-Pr2N)2POEtCN, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) 3, Im-OTf, 0 °C to rt, 97% (R=n-C15H31), 73% (R=C17H33); (e) t-BuO2H, CH2Cl2, rt; (f) Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt; (g) 0.15 N HCl, CHCl3, CH3OH, 0 °C, 66% (R=n-C15H31), 52% (R=C17H33).
Next, we turned our attention to carrying out the convergent synthesis of homologous lysonucleolipids 12 and 13 via mono-acylation of a phosphoglycerol intermediate towards the end of the synthesis (Scheme 2). While regioselective monoacylation of the sn-1-position of late-stage phosphoglycerol intermediates using carbodiimide-mediated or mixed anhydride acylation protocols has typically led to low yields of lysophosphatidylated products, the regioselective derivatization of vicinal diols using reactive stannylene acetal intermediates has been widely applied in organic synthesis.11 Thus, we envisioned that the differentially acylated nucleolipids 12 and 13 could be assembled by first, constructing the protected phosphoglycerol 15 through tandem phosphitylation of alcohols 3 and 14, and then—subsequent to protecting group manipulation—selective tin-mediated mono-acylation12 of the sn-1-position of the phosphoglycerol 17.
Scheme 2.
Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) 1H-tetrazole, (i-Pr2N)2POEtCN, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) 3, Im-OTf, 0 °C to rt, 87%; (b) t-BuO2H, CH2Cl2, rt; (c) Rapoport’s reagent, CH2Cl2, rt, 80%; (d) Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt; (e) TMSOTf, CH2Cl2, rt, 90% (2 steps); (f) RCO2H, EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, <35% yield); (g) Bu2SnO, refluxing i-PrOH; (h) Me2SnCl2, K2CO3, THF, rt; (i) Me2SnCl2, TEA, CH2Cl2, rt; (j) RCO2Cl, 59% (21), 80% (22); (k) 10% Pd/C, H2, THF, 59% (12), 65% (13).
Accordingly, commercially available (S)-1,2-isopropylidene glycerol (14) was treated with 2-cyanoethyl N,N,N',N'-tetraisopropylphosphordiamidite in the presence of tetrazole to give the corresponding glycerol phosphoramidite, which was reacted in situ with imidazoquinoline 3 in the presence of imidazolium triflate to afford the desired phosphite intermediate in 87% yield after chromatographic purification. Subsequent oxidation of the intermediate phosphite led to phosphate 15 in quantitative yield after chromatography. Due to the incompatibility of the primary aromatic amino group of 15 with stannylene and other O-acylation protocols as well as the susceptibility of the cyanoethyl group of 15 to β-elimination in the presence of the unprotected amino group,13 the amine was protected as the benzyl carbamate 16 in 80% yield using 1-carbobenzoxy-3-methylimidazolium trifuoromethanesulfonate (Rapoport’s reagent).14 Sequential removal of the cyanoethyl and acetonide groups of 16 with triethylamine and trimethylsilyl triflate (TMSOTf)15 then gave the phosphoglycerol common advanced intermediate 1716 in excellent yield. Reversing the order of protecting group removal or simultaneous deprotection of the 2-cyanoethyl and acetonide groups with TMSOTf / N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA)17 resulted in significantly lower yields of 17 and the formation of imidazoquinoline 18 as a significant by-product.
Consistent with literature reports with other phosphoglycerols, attempts to selectively acylate the sn-1-hydroxy group of key intermediate 17 under carbodiimide-mediated conditions with lauric or palmitic acid or with the corresponding acid anhydrides in the presence of base led to low yields (<35%) of monoacylated products 21 and 22 accompanied by significant amounts of di-acylated and other by-products, which were difficult to separate chromatographically. Not unexpectedly, phosphoglycerol 17 could be readily diacylated under standard conditions (fatty acid/ DCC, DMAP) in high yield (data not shown).
Since dibutyltin oxide (DBTO) was recently employed to selectively mono-acylate the sn-1-position of a glycerophosphoryl choline,12 we attempted to prepare 21 via acylation of dibutylstannylene acetal 19 with lauroyl chloride. However, under the conditions of the reaction (1 equiv DBTO, refluxing i-PrOH; then lauroyl chloride, Et3N) the intermediate stannylene 19 was converted to imidazoquinoline 18 in nearly quantitative yield, presumably via intramolecular attack of the reactive stannylene on the phosphodiester group. Similarly, treatment of 17 with catalytic amounts of dimethyltin dichloride reagent18 in the presence of potassium carbonate in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) at room temperature to form 20 also led to the formation of 18 as the major product, despite the milder reaction conditions. Gratifyingly, by employing an organic base (Et3N) in place of potassium carbonate as demonstrated by Onomura19 in the mono-silylation of diols via dimethylstannylene intermediates, the CAI 17 was converted to the desired mono-acyl products 21 and 22 in 59% and 80% overall yield,20 respectively, after treating the in situ-prepared stannylene 20 with the requisite acyl chlorides in dichloromethane at room temperature. Hydrogenolysis of the N-Cbz group then provided the desired lysophospholipids 12 and 13 in 59% and 65% yield,21 respectively, after chromatographic purification.
In summary, a short and convergent synthesis of lysophospholipid conjugates of TLR7/8-active imidazoquinoline 3 was developed utilizing a common advanced intermediate strategy and a reactive tin acetal to incorporate different acyl residues in the penultimate step. The synthesis of nucleolipids 12 and 13 in 2 steps and in 35–52% overall yield from CAI 17 by this method compares very favorably to the linear preparation of the homologous lysophospholipids 5 and 6 in 8 steps and 19–33% overall yield from tosylate 7. The biological activity of these lysophosphatidylated imidazoquinolines will be reported elsewhere.
-
-
A new protocol for the lysophosphatidylation of alcohols is reported
-
-
It involves the tin-mediated regioselective acylation of a glycerol intermediate
-
-
It is applied to the lysophosphatidylation of TLR7/8-active imidazoquinolines
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under contract HHSN272200900036C (to Corixa Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIAID.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and notes
- 1.Gerster JF, Lindstrom KJ, Miller RL, Tomai MA, Birmachu W, Bomersine SN, Gibson SJ, Imbertson LM, Jacobson JR, Knafla RT, Maye PV, Nikolaides N, Oneyemi FY, Parkhurst GJ, Pecore SE, Reiter MJ, Scribner LS, Testerman TL, Thompson NJ, Wagner TL, Weeks CE, Andre JD, Lagain D, Bastard Y, Lupu M. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:3481. doi: 10.1021/jm049211v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miller RL, Meng T-C, Tomai MA. Drug News Perspect. 2008;21:69. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2008.21.2.1188193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bagnoli F, Fontana MR, Soldaini E, Mishra RPN, Fiaschi L, Cartocci E, Nardi-Dei V, Ruggiero P, Nosari S, De Falco MG, Lofano G, Marchi S, Galletti B, Mariotti P, Bacconi M, Torre A, Maccari S, Scarselli M, Rinaudo CD, Inoshima N, Savino S, Mori E, Rossi-Paccani S, Baudner B, Pallaoro M, Swennen E, Petracca R, Brettoni C, Liberatori S, Norais N, Monaci E, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Schneewind O, OGÇÖHagan DT, Valiante NM, Bensi G, Bertholet S, De Gregorio E, Rappuoli R, Grandi G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015;112:3680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424924112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sabado RL, Pavlick A, Gnjatic S, Cruz CM, Vengco I, Hasan F, Spadaccia M, Darvishian F, Chiriboga L, Holman RM, Escalon J, Muren C, Escano C, Yepes E, Sharpe D, Vasilakos JP, Rolnitzsky L, Goldberg JD, Mandeli J, Adams S, Jungbluth A, Pan L, Venhaus R, Ott PA, Bhardwaj N. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015;3:278. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strominger NL, Brady R, Gullikson G, Carpenter DO. Brain Res. Bull. 2001;55:445. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00539-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee J, Chuang TH, Redecke V, She L, Pitha PM, Carson DA, Raz E, Cottam HB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:6646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0631696100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chan M, Hayashi T, Kuy CS, Gray CS, Wu CCN, Corr M, Wrasidlo W, Cottam HB, Carson DA. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:1194. doi: 10.1021/bc900054q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bibak N, Hajdu J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:5875. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosseto R, Bibak N, Hajdu J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:7371. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rosseto R, Bibak N, DeOcampo R, Shah T, Gabrielian A, Hajdu J. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:1691. doi: 10.1021/jo062352f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.David S, Hanessian S. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:643. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fasoli E, Arnone A, Caligiuri A, D'Arrigo P, de Ferra L, Servi S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:2974. doi: 10.1039/b604636c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quantitative removal of the 2-cyanoethyl phosphate protecting group of 15 (neat) containing a free 4-amino group was observed at room temperature over a 48-hour period. In contrast, ~10% deprotection of the cyanoethyl group was observed in the case of the corresponding des-4-amino derivative (not shown; prepared via tandem phosphitylation of 14 and 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-butyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline) when stored (neat) for 2 weeks at room temperature.
- 14.Watkins BE, Kiely JS, Rapoport H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:5702. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Poon KWC, Lovell KM, Dresner KN, Datta A. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:752. doi: 10.1021/jo7021923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Synthesis of 17: (S)-1,2-isopropylidene glycerol 14 (2.0 eq) and 2-cyanoethyl N,N,N',N'-tetraisopropylphosphordiamidite (2.1 eq) were dissolved in anhydrous methylene chloride (0.5 M) at room temperature (rt). 1H-tetrazole (2.1 eq) was added in five portions over 20 minutes and the reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for one hour. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, imidazoquinoline 3 (1.0 eq) and imidazolium triflate (1.5 eq) were added, and the reaction mixture allowed to warm up to rt. After 1.5 hour at rt, the crude was purified by chromatography on silica gel (0–10% CH3OH in CHCl3). The resulting phosphite was dissolved in anhydrous methylene chloride (0.4 M) and oxidized by addition of t-butyl hydroperoxide (2.0 eq). The reaction was done after stirring at rt for 30 min. After aqueous work-up and purification by chromatography on silica gel, 15 was obtained in 89% yield. 15: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (s, 2H), 4.83 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 4.56 (m, 2H), 4.15-3.60 (m, 7H), 2.95 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.86 (m, 2H), 1.60-1.50 (m, 2H), 1.36 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.02 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [M+H]+ 532.2326, found 532.2352. Rapoport’s reagent (4 eq) was added to a solution of 15 in CH2Cl2 (0.4 M) and stirred at rt for 18 hours. After purification by chromatography on silica gel (0–10% CH3OH in CHCl3) 16 was obtained in 80 % yield. 16: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (m, 3H), 7.41-7.34 (m, 3H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 4.84 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 4.57 (m, 2H), 4.13-3.60 (m, 7H), 2.94 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.55 (m, 2H), 1.90 (m, 2H), 1.50 (m, 2H), 1.35 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 3H), 1.29 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). Triethylamine (35% v/v) was added to a solution of 16 in acetonitrile (0.4 M) and stirred at rt. After 16 hours, excess triethylamine was removed and purification by chromatography on silica gel (0–30% CH3OH in CHCl3) gave the deprotected phosphate in 85% yield. Subsequent acetonide group deprotection with trimethylsilyl triflate (4.0 eq) in CH2Cl2 (0.3 M) at 0 °C for two hours followed by aqueous work up with solid NaHCO3 and purification by chromatography on silica gel (0–20% CH3OH/H2O/NH4OH 7:2:1 in CHCl3) afforded 17 in quantitative yield. 17: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD/drop of NH4OH): δ 8.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62-7.49 (m, 4H), 7.41-7.33 (m, 3H), 5.32 (s, 2H), 4.89 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 4.34 (m, 2H), 3.58-3.36 (m, 5H), 3.12 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.04 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [M+H]+ 573.2115, found 573.2148.
- 17.Rychnovsky SD, Kim J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:7219. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maki T, Iwasaki F, Matsumura Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:5601. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takeichi T, Kuriyama M, Onomura O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:6646. [Google Scholar]
- 20.General procedure for the synthesis of 21 and 22: to a suspension of 17 in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (0.3 M) was added Me2SnCl2 (10 mol %) followed by TEA (1.5 eq) and acyl chloride (1.1 eq). The reaction was stirred at room temperature under N2 for two hours. Purification by chromatography on silica gel (0–30% CH3OH in CHCl3) gave the monoacylated products 21 (54% yield) and 22 (80% yield). 21: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.07 (bs, 1H), 7.51-7.44 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.32 (m, 5H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 4.73 (m, 2H), 4.34 (m, 2H), 4.07-3.66 (m, 5H), 2.97 (m, 2H), 2.27 (m, 2H), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.56-1.42 (m, 4H), 1.33-1.15 (m, 16H), 0.97 (m, 3H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [M+H]+ 755.3786, Found 755.3836. 22: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.99 (bs, 1H), 7.50 (m, 3H), 7.42-7.32 (m, 5H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 4.63 (m, 2H), 4.29 (m, 2H), 4.06-3.69 (m, 5H), 2.93 (m, 2H), 2.24 (m, 2H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.54-1.43 (m, 4H), 1.29-1.15 (m, 20H), 0.95 (m, 3H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [M+H]+ 783.4099, Found 783.4115.
- 21.General procedure for the synthesis of 12 and 13: a solution of 21 or 22 in anhydrous THF (0.1 M) was hydrogenated at rt in presence of 10% Pd/C (50% w/w) under atmospheric H2 pressure overnight. After filtration of the catalyst and concentration of the reaction mixture, the resulting crude was purified by chromatography on silica gel (0–25% CH3OH/H2O 95:5 in CHCl3) to afford 12 (54% yield) and 13 (65% yield). 12 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD): δ 8.11 (bs, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (bs, 1H), 6.80 (bs, 1H), 4.62 (bs, 4H), 4.07-3.85 (m, 5H), 2.96 (bs, 2H), 2.26 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.91-1.83 (m, 2H), 1.53-1.45 (m, 4H), 1.18 (m, 16H), 0.99 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.81 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [M+H]+ 621.3418, found 621.3481. 13 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD): δ 8.10 (bs, 1H), 7.32 (bs, 1H), 7.11 (bs, 1H), 6.80 (bs, 1H), 4.62 (m, 4H), 4.07-3.83 (m, 5H), 2.90 (m, 2H), 2.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.53-1.47 (m, 4H), 1.19 (m, 20H), 0.99 (t, J = 7.2, 3H), 0.82 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H); positive ES TOF-MS calc for [[M+H]+ 649.3731, found 649.3796.




