Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;2015(6):CD004123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004123.pub4

Wang 2011.

Methods Open‐label, randomised controlled trial
Participants 86 people with diabetes with 93 chronic non‐healing ulcers in the foot area
Group 1: 41 randomised (46 ulcers)
Group 2: 45 randomised (47 ulcers)
Interventions Group 1: extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)
Group 2: HBOT
EWST treatment dose was ulcer size‐dependent. Treatments were conducted 2 times per week for 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatments. After ESWT, patients resumed their initial wound care protocol. Administration of additional antibiotic was discretional.
HBOT was at a pressure of 2.5 ATA for 90 minutes per treatment daily for a total 20 days of treatments. Patients received the same standard wound care protocol after treatment as ESWT.
Outcomes Ulcers healed
Ulcers with ≥50% improvement
Unchanged ulcers
Worsened ulcers
Notes 27 patients (ESWT: 12 with 14 ulcers; HBOT: 15 with 17 ulcers) also received a second course of treatment due to improved but incomplete healing of the ulcers 4 to 6 weeks from the first treatment
The denominator used in the analysis was the number of ulcers not patients. Results reported for completers. Clinical trial number NCT01219127
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised, but no statement of how randomisation sequence was generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No statement on allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "patients and healthcare providers were not blinded"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No statement on blinding of outcome assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "During the course of treatment, 9 patients were excluded including 2 in the ESWT group (2 poor compliance) and seven in the HBO group (7 incomplete follow‐up data)."
Incomplete outcome data addressed (use of intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis) High risk Patients withdrawing were not balanced in numbers across intervention groups, and reasons were not similar across groups. Analysis not undertaken using ITT
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes specified in trials register reported in article

ATA: atmospheres absolute
 HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
 HBOT: hyperbaric oxygen therapy
 ITT: intention‐to‐treat
 SF‐36: Short Form (36) Health Survey