Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Voice. 2019 Jul 25;35(1):85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.001

Table 2.

Summary statistics and analysis of the PTF

CONDITION EXTENSION MEANS (SD) P-VALUE* CONDITION RESTRICTION MEANS (SD) P-VALUE**
CONTROL 12.38 (4.00) - CONTROL 10.65 (3.47) -
5 CM 10.89 (3.89) .436 3 MM (n=12) 6.99 (4.06) .005†
25 CM 10.83 (4.30) .301 9 MM 10.22 (4.18) .75
50 CM 11.06 (4.15) .206 15 MM 9.55 (3.88) .014†
75 CM 11.08 (3.80) .627 21 MM 10.20 (3.90) .769
POST CONTROL 11.76 (4.55) .996 POST CONTROL 10.21 (4.17) .747

Table 2 PTF in L/min. Table 2 shows the means and standard deviations of the phonation threshold flow in addition to the results of repeated measures ANOVA. The left half shows the results for the straw extensions and the right half shows results from the straw restrictions. The 3 mm restriction worked only in 12 larynges, which represents less than half of the total larynges (n=29).

*

p-value using a repeated measures ANOVA with Sidak correction for a condition versus control. Data were transformed using a log10 transformation in order to meet the normality condition.

†

Significant at the .05 level