Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul 28;24(30):6733–6740. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1650-04.2004

Table 2.

Correlation between impulsivity measures and locomotor activity (genetic and nongenetic variability)



Between strain (genetic)

Within strain (environmental)
Impulsivity measure
Correlation
p
Correlation
p
Average bias across a session −0.922 <0.01 0.129 NS
Mean bias at longest delay (8 sec)
−0.696
<0.05
0.097
NS

Between-strain analysis (the genetic component of variation) revealed a significant (based on the fact that the top confidence limits do not embrace the null hypothesis value of zero correlation) negative correlation between increased choice of the large reward response (less impulsive choice) and locomotor activity measures. In contrast, the within-strain analysis (the nongenetic component of variation) revealed no such correlation.