Figure 3.
Left, Total area of the CFA in SRC and URC animals in the three different training schedules. The mean percentage of the CFA ± SEM occupied by distal (middle) and proximal (right) forelimb movement representations. SRC animals had a significantly greater proportion of the CFA occupied by distal movement representations than the URC animals after 10 d of training (*p < 0.05; Fisher's PLSD). Conversely, URC animals had a significantly greater proportion of the CFA occupied by proximal movement representations than SRC animals after 10 d (*p < 0.05; PLSD).