Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 22;30(38):12557–12565. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2722-10.2010

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Relevance index. a, Relevance indices of individual neglect patients for invalidly cued targets shown in the left visual field. Patients 1–10 (gray bars) belong to the relevance-neglect group; patients 11–20 (white bars) belong to the nonrelevance group. Positive values indicate increased reaction times following relevant cues compared with irrelevant cues. The dashed horizontal lines indicate average relevance indices of each group. b, Average relevance indices of the four groups of participants. Cont, Healthy controls; RH: right-hemisphere controls; rel+, relevance neglect patients; rel−, nonrelevance neglect patients; LVF, left visual field; RVF, right visual field. Error bars show SEM.