Table 2.
Contingency table comparing conventional and refined intrinsic subtypes among all 989-case METABRIC study cohort.
| Refined intrinsic subtype | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Her2 | LA | LB | Normal | Sum | ||
|
Conventional Intrinsic subtype |
Basal | 100 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 115 |
| Her2 | 0 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | |
| LA | 0 | 8 | 355 | 102 | 0 | 465 | |
| LB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 267 | 0 | 268 | |
| Normal | 1 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 18 | 57 | |
| Sum | 101 | 113 | 384 | 373 | 18 | 989 | |
For the plots in Fig. 6, we used the patients that are either LA or LB in both conventional and refined subtypes (underlined).