Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;12(3):431–440. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.014

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Generation of HPS2-iPSCs and cHPS2-iPSCs

(A) Schematic overview of the generation of HPS2-iPSCs and cHPS2-iPSCs.

(B) Different mutations in each allele of the patient fibroblasts.

(C) Strategy for correcting the mutation in exon 18.

(D) Sequence data of exon 18 in donor fibroblasts, HPS2-iPSCs, and cHPS2-iPSCs. The mutation was corrected in cHPS2-iPSCs.

(E) qRT-PCR of AP3B1 in each cell line. 201B7 was used for control iPSCs (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments). A one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used. ∗p < 0.05; n.s., not significant.

(F) IF staining of the β3A subunit of AP-3 complex in each iPSC line. 201B7 was used for control iPSCs. Scale bars, 100 μm.

(G) Surface CD63 expression in control iPSCs, HPS2-iPSCs, and cHPS2-iPSCs. 201B7 was used for control iPSCs.

(H) Median fluorescence intensity of CD63-Alexa647 (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments). A one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used. ∗p < 0.05; n.s., not significant.

See also Figure S1.