Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2019 Feb 26;63(3):e01586-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01586-18

Investigation of Novel pmrB and eptA Mutations in Isogenic Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates Associated with Colistin Resistance and Increased Virulence In Vivo

Stefanie Gerson a, Jonathan W Betts b, Kai Lucaßen a, Carolina Silva Nodari a,c, Julia Wille a,d, Michaele Josten e,i, Stephan Göttig f, Jennifer Nowak a, Danuta Stefanik a, Ignasi Roca g, Jordi Vila g, José M Cisneros h, Roberto M La Ragione b, Harald Seifert a,d, Paul G Higgins a,d,✉
PMCID: PMC6395940  PMID: 30617096

Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is of great concern and is a threat to human health. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms of colistin resistance in four isogenic pairs of A. baumannii isolates displaying an increase in colistin MICs.

KEYWORDS: Acinetobacter, antibiotic resistance, genome analysis, lipid A, virulence

ABSTRACT

Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is of great concern and is a threat to human health. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms of colistin resistance in four isogenic pairs of A. baumannii isolates displaying an increase in colistin MICs. A mutation in pmrB was detected in each colistin-resistant isolate, three of which were novel (A28V, I232T, and ΔL9-G12). Increased expression of pmrC was shown by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) for three colistin-resistant isolates, and the addition of phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) to lipid A by PmrC was revealed by mass spectrometry. Interestingly, PEtN addition was also observed in some colistin-susceptible isolates, indicating that this resistance mechanism might be strain specific and that other factors could contribute to colistin resistance. Furthermore, the introduction of pmrAB carrying the short amino acid deletion ΔL9-G12 into a pmrAB knockout strain resulted in increased pmrC expression and lipid A modification, but colistin MICs remained unchanged, further supporting the strain specificity of this colistin resistance mechanism. Of note, a mutation in the pmrC homologue eptA and a point mutation in ISAba1 upstream of eptA were associated with colistin resistance and increased eptA expression, which is a hitherto undescribed resistance mechanism. Moreover, no cost of fitness was observed for colistin-resistant isolates, while the virulence of these isolates was increased in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Although the mutations in pmrB were associated with colistin resistance, PEtN addition appears not to be the sole factor leading to colistin resistance, indicating that the mechanism of colistin resistance is far more complex than previously suspected and is potentially strain specific.

INTRODUCTION

Acinetobacter baumannii is of major concern in the hospital setting and causes a wide range of nosocomial infections, e.g., wound and urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and bloodstream infections (1). The ability of the bacterium to acquire or upregulate antimicrobial resistance determinants and its propensity for epidemic spread have led to a high frequency of multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii strains worldwide (2, 3). The World Health Organization has classified carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii as “priority one” on the global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for research and development of new antibiotics (4).

Colistin (polymyxin E) was first isolated from Paenibacillus polymyxa (formerly Bacillus polymyxa var. colistinus) in 1949 (5). Due to its nephrotoxicity, the clinical use of colistin was discontinued in the 1980s. Since effective antimicrobial agents are often lacking in the treatment of MDR pathogens like A. baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, colistin was reintroduced in the 1990s (6). However, colistin resistance is increasingly reported in A. baumannii isolates, and pandrug-resistant A. baumannii isolates have emerged (7–9).

Colistin is a cationic polypeptide antibiotic, and its primary target is the outer bacterial cell membrane. The molecule interacts with the negatively charged lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules of the cell membrane by displacement of positively charged ions (Mg2+ and Ca2+), which destroys the integrity of the cell membrane, subsequently leading to cell death (6). The modification of the lipid A fraction of LPS in the bacterial cell membrane is the main colistin resistance mechanism. The modifications include the addition of 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose (LAra4N), phosphoethanolamine (PEtN), or galactosamine to lipid A (10–12). These modifications lower the net negative charge of the cell membrane, thereby affecting the binding of colistin and preventing the disruption of the cell membrane (6). A. baumannii is lacking the biosynthesis genes for LAra4N, and therefore it uses PEtN addition as the main colistin resistance mechanism, which is mediated by the chromosomally encoded pmrCAB operon. The PEtN transferase PmrC facilitates the addition of the compound to lipid A and is strictly regulated by the two-component system PmrAB (11, 13). Increased expression of pmrC is associated with a decrease in colistin susceptibility and is often due to mutations in the pmrAB regulators (13–14). Two other colistin resistance mechanisms have been described in A. baumannii. The first mechanism involves the complete loss of LPS due to mutations in or disruption of the LPS biosynthesis genes. Amino acid substitutions, frameshifts, or truncation of lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD have been described to lead to a complete loss of LPS and subsequently to colistin resistance in laboratory-derived and clinical A. baumannii isolates (15). The second, more recently reported mechanism is due to the disruption of the global regulator H-NS by insertion sequence ISAba125 (16). H-NS is predicted to negatively regulate the expression of the pmrC homologue eptA, which in turn modifies lipid A by PEtN addition (16). Moreover, a plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinant (mcr-1) has been reported worldwide in many Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli) (17), but so far it has not been detected in A. baumannii.

In this study, we investigate the mechanisms of colistin resistance in four isogenic pairs of A. baumannii isolates that were obtained from patients hospitalized in Germany, Greece, and Spain. We analyzed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to identify mutations in pmrB and eptA in isolates with a high colistin MIC. Moreover, we investigated the virulence of colistin-resistant isolates in a Galleria mellonella infection model.

RESULTS

Description of isolates.

To investigate the mechanisms of colistin resistance, we selected four pairs of A. baumannii isolates obtained during the patients’ hospital course (Table 1). The isolates were collected from patients hospitalized in Germany, Greece, and Spain. With the exception of isolate pair 2, all isolates were recovered while the patients were receiving colistin therapy. The isogenic background of all isolates representing an isolate pair was confirmed by WGS (allele differences, <10). The isolates exhibited an increase in colistin MIC by at least four log2 dilutions as determined by broth microdilution. The isolates from Spain and Greece all belonged to the international clonal lineage IC2, while isolate pair 4 belonged to IC4. Isolates with low colistin MICs preceded the isolates with high colistin MICs within an isolate pair (Table 1). Isolate pair 1 and 2 were recovered from patients hospitalized in Seville, Spain, and displayed an increase in colistin MICs from 2 to 256 mg/liter. In isolate pair 1, isolates were obtained from one patient, and in isolate pair 2, both isolates were recovered from different patients at day 3 of therapy. Both isolates from isolate pair 3, recovered from different patients hospitalized in Athens, Greece, were considered colistin resistant. Nevertheless, the colistin MICs differed by at least four log2 dilutions (32 versus ≥256 mg/liter). Isolate pair 4 was recovered from a patient hospitalized in Frankfurt, Germany, and it exhibited a colistin MIC increase from 1 to 256 mg/liter. The patient was infected with both isolates at the same time when admitted to the hospital. All MIC differences were seen consistently in three independent experiments.

TABLE 1.

Overview of isogenic A. baumannii isolate pairs and amino acid substitutions in PmrB and EptA

Isolate pair no. Isolate Patient identifier Date of isolation (day of (day-mo-yr) isolationa ) Antibiotic treatmente Sample typef Origin Clonal lineagec Colistin MIC (mg/liter)b Amino acid substitution ind :
PmrB EptA
1 MB_2 01-001 13-05-2012 (3) Col R Seville, Spain IC2 2 ΔL9-G12
MB_6C 24-05-2012 (F) S 256
2 MB_23C 01-016 25-10-2012 (3) Mem S Seville, Spain IC2 2 I232T R127L
MB_177 01-041 04-02-2013 (3) S 256
3 MB_90 21-107 18-11-2013 (F) Col R Athens, Greece IC2 32 A28V
MB_119 21-140 06-02-2014 (3) R >256
4 SG3161 KBT6804357 03-2016 (nd) Col W Frankfurt, Germany IC4 1 S17R
SG3166 03-2016 (nd) R 256
a

Hospital day after enrollment into the clinical trial. F, sample recovered at the end of the patient's antibiotic treatment; nd, not determined.

b

The colistin MIC was determined by broth microdilution.

c

Clonal lineages were determined by cgMLST.

d

Amino acid substitutions were detected by comparison of the amino acid sequences within isolates of an isolate pair.

e

Col, colistin; Mem, meropenem.

f

R, respiratory tract; S, stool; W, wound.

Resistome analysis.

In addition, the MICs of 12 different antimicrobials were determined, and the resistome of each isolate was analyzed by ResFinder (Table S1, Fig. S1). In general, all isolates have an MDR phenotype, as they were resistant to at least nine different antimicrobials from six different antimicrobial classes (Table S1). Moreover, the MICs were very similar, and phenotype shifts from susceptible to resistant were only observed in isolate pair 1 for tigecycline. The acquired resistomes were identical in isolate pair 1 and 3, while isolate pair 2 differed in aminoglycoside and sulfonamide resistance determinants and isolate pair 4 differed in aminoglycoside and tetracycline resistance determinants (Fig. S1).

Analysis of pmrCAB, eptA, and other allele differences.

Comparison of the draft genomes revealed differences in the pmrCAB operon between isolates representing an isolate pair. In the four isolates with high colistin MICs, the amino acid substitutions S17R, A28V, and I232T, as well as the 4-amino acid deletion ΔL9-G12, were detected in PmrB (Table 1). Both PmrA and PmrC were identical in isolates of an isolate pair. Moreover, a pmrC homologue (termed eptA) was present in isolate pairs 1, 2, and 3. However, eptA was not detected in isolate pair 4, A. baumannii ATCC 19606, or the pmrAB knockout, as determined by WGS or by PCR. The amino acid substitution R127L was detected in EptA in the colistin-resistant isolate MB_177 of isolate pair 2. Moreover, ISAba1 was found in reverse orientation upstream of eptA in both isolates MB_23C and MB_177. While the insertion site was identical, a single point mutation (A→T) was observed in position 1091, close to the putative promoter region in ISAba1 in isolate MB_177.

Besides mutations in the pmrCAB operon, disruption of H-NS or mutations in/disruptions of genes involved in LPS/lipid A biosynthesis have been associated with colistin resistance. Since no differences were detected, these gene products were considered not to be associated with colistin resistance in our isolates. Furthermore, the plasmid-mediated resistance determinant mcr-1 or its homologues were not present. Other allele differences were detected in all isolate pairs except for isolate pair 4 (Table S2). Isolate pair 1 differed in three alleles, isolate pair 2 in eight alleles, and isolate pair 3 in four alleles. Most of these alleles included hypothetical and uncharacterized proteins, or components of bacterial metabolism, but also two putative transcription regulators differed in isolate pair 2.

Increased expression of pmrC and eptA.

Since amino acid deletions or substitutions were detected in PmrB in all colistin-resistant isolates, we investigated their effect on the expression of pmrC by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). The relative expression was compared between isolates of an isolate pair (Fig. 1A). The expression of pmrC was significantly increased in the colistin-resistant isolates, MB_6C and SG3166. Compared to that in the colistin-susceptible isolates, pmrC was expressed approximately 13× more than that in isolate MB_6C, while in isolate SG3166, a 10-fold increase in expression was observed. Although both isolates in isolate pair 3 were considered colistin resistant, the expression of pmrC was approximately 4× higher in isolate MB_119 compared to that in MB_90. Interestingly, the expression of pmrC was significantly decreased in MB_177 (the colistin-resistant isolate of isolate pair 2), so a different resistance mechanism is suggested in this isolate. Furthermore, the analysis of eptA expression by qRT-PCR revealed slightly increased expression in isolate MB_6C and decreased expression in isolate MB_119 compared to that in the isolates with low colistin MICs (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the expression of eptA was significantly higher in isolate MB_177 compared to that in MB_23C, although in both isolates, ISAba1 was found in reverse orientation upstream of the gene. These findings suggest an association of point mutations in ISAba1 or eptA with increased eptA expression and colistin resistance.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Relative pmrC and eptA expression of all isolate pairs, determined by qRT-PCR. The number of pmrC transcripts (A) and eptA transcripts (B) of isolates with low colistin MICs (white) was related to that of isolates with higher colistin MIC (gray) after being normalized to the expression of the reference gene rpoB and the susceptible isolate, set as 1. Depicted are isolate pair 1 (MB_2 and MB_6C), isolate pair 2 (MB_23C and MB_177), isolate pair 3 (MB_90, MB_119), and isolate pair 4 (SG3161 and SG3166). Results are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was done by performing an unpaired t test using the recorded absolute values. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

Lipid A modifications.

An increased expression of pmrC or eptA is associated with the addition of PEtN to lipid A. To measure potential modifications of lipid A, LPS and lipid A was extracted from both mid-log-phase and overnight cultures of the isolate pairs and the reference strain A. baumannii ATCC 19606. Analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) revealed no significant differences between mid-log-phase and overnight cultures, as very similar mass spectra were obtained. The following major lipid A species were detected in the reference strain ATCC 19606 and all isolate pairs (Fig. 2A to E): hepta-acylated lipid A (m/z 1,910), hexa-acylated lipid A (m/z 1,728), penta-acylated lipid A lacking one fatty acid moiety (m/z 1,530), and tetra-acylated lipid A (m/z 1,404). However, peaks at m/z 1,530 and m/z 1,404 were small and unclear for some isolates (data not shown). The addition of PEtN (theoretical m/z 124) to lipid A is shown by the mass at m/z 2,034 (+1 PEtN) and m/z 2,157 (+2 PEtN). A single PEtN addition was found in isolate pair 1, exclusively in the colistin-resistant isolate MB_6C (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the mass at m/z 2,034 was detected in both isolates of isolate pair 2 (Fig. 2C). This was also observed in isolate pair 4 (Fig. 2E). These unexpected findings suggest a different or additional resistance mechanism in isolates MB_177 and SG3166. Furthermore, the relatively high colistin MICs of both isolates of isolate pair 3 were probably not due to PEtN addition, since a single PEtN addition was detected in isolates MB_90 and MB_119 (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, the addition of two PEtN molecules to lipid A (m/z 2,157) was observed only in isolate MB_119. Moreover, the addition of galactosamine to lipid A, which is indicated by a mass at m/z 2,071, was not observed in any isolate. Although PEtN addition was detected in colistin-resistant isolates, it seemed to be a strain-specific mechanism.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Mass spectra of lipid A extracted from overnight cultures of A. baumannii isolates. Represented are mass spectra in the range of m/z 1,650 to 2,200, and masses of important lipid A species are given in the spectra (24). (A) A. baumannii ATCC 19606, (B) isolate pair 1 (MB_2 and MB_6C), (C) isolate pair 2 (MB_23C and MB_177), (D) isolate pair 3 (MB_90 and MB_119), (E) isolate pair 4 (SG3161 and SG3166). An arrow indicates PEtN addition indicated by a mass at m/z 2,034 or 2,157. ColS, colistin-susceptible; ColR = colistin-resistant.

Similar growth kinetics for all isolates.

Mutations in pmrB have been reported to carry a fitness cost (32). We therefore sought to investigate if our colistin-resistant isolates exhibited reduced growth and found that growth rates within an isolate pair did not differ (Fig. S2). In addition, growth rates and doubling times were calculated for all isolates, and this also revealed no differences within an isolate pair (data not shown). Therefore, the acquisition of colistin resistance did not appear to have a fitness cost as measured by growth kinetics.

Increased virulence in isolates with high colistin MICs.

Colistin resistance is reportedly associated with decreased fitness and virulence (32–33). Therefore, we also investigated the virulence of these isolate pairs in the G. mellonella model of infection. The larvae were infected with the A. baumannii isolates, and survival, as well as melanization, was assessed (Fig. 3 and 4). Interestingly, the colistin-resistant isolates exhibited increased virulence (Fig. 3). In isolate pair 1, the survival rate of the larvae infected with MB_2 was 40% after 48 h, while none survived when infected with MB_6C (P ≤ 0.021). After 96 h, the survival rate of larvae infected with MB_177 was also lower (30%) compared to that of those infected with MB_23C (60%) (P ≥ 0.04). Although both isolates of isolate pair 3 are colistin resistant, a difference in virulence was also observed. While 50% of larvae infected with isolate MB_90 survived, the survival rate of larvae infected with MB_119 was only 20% after 96 h (P ≤ 0.04). No significant differences were detected in comparison of larvae infected with the isolates of isolate pair 4; both isolates resulted in low survival rates of approximately 30% after 96 h, although a higher percentage of larvae were killed in the first 24 h when infected with the colistin-resistant isolate SG3166 (P ≤ 0.17).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Survival curves for G. mellonella larvae infected with different A. baumannii isolates. Illustrated are isolate pairs 1 to 4 (A to D). G. mellonella larvae were infected with 105 CFU/larva, and survival was observed over 96 h. Isolates with low colistin MICs are represented in blue, isolates with high colistin MICs in red, and the PBS control in black.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Infection of G. mellonella larvae with different A. baumannii isolates and its effect on melanization (morbidity). G. mellonella larvae were infected with 105 CFU/larva, and melanization was observed over 96 h. A higher melanization score indicates greater morbidity. The PBS control had a melanization score of 0. Depicted are isolate pairs 1 to 4 (A to D). Isolates with low colistin MICs are represented in white and isolates with high colistin MICs in black.

Similar results were observed for melanization, which is used as an indicator for morbidity. Although all A. baumannii isolates induced high levels of melanization, higher melanization scores were observed in larvae infected with isolates with higher colistin MICs (Fig. 4). Larvae infected with the colistin-resistant isolate MB_6C displayed increased melanization over the entire time course (24 h to 96 h). Infection with isolates MB_177 and MB_119 led to unchanged or decreased rates of melanization after 24 h, but was elevated after 48 to 96 h. In contrast, larvae infected with isolate pair 4 revealed lower melanization scores for the colistin-susceptible isolate after 24 h and very similar and constant melanization scores between 48 and 96 h for both isolates, indicating no significant difference in morbidity. Both the decreased survival rates and the elevated melanization scores indicate a greater virulence in the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates MB_6C, MB_117, and MB_119.

Introduction of pmrAB variants into A. baumannii ΔpmrAB.

To further analyze the association of pmrB mutations with colistin resistance, a pmrAB knockout strain was created (ΔpmrAB). The pmrAB variants from isolates MB_2 and MB_6C, as well as that from ATCC 19606 as a control, were introduced into ΔpmrAB, and colistin MICs were determined (Table S3). Surprisingly, the colistin MICs were 0.5 to 1 mg/liter, regardless of the pmrAB variant introduced into the knockout strain. To confirm the expression of pmrAB on the plasmid and pmrC in ΔpmrAB, gene expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Large numbers of pmrA and pmrB transcripts were detected in all cases, indicating expression of both genes on the plasmid (data not shown). Moreover, the expression of pmrC was significantly increased in ΔpmrAB complemented with pmrAB from isolate MB_6C (ΔL9-G12), whereas the expression did not differ in ΔpmrAB complemented with pmrAB from ATCC 19606 and isolate MB_2 (Fig. 5). Slightly increased pmrC expression was detected in the wild-type ATCC 19606 compared to ΔpmrAB, indicating a basal expression of pmrC.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Relative pmrC expression of A. baumannii ΔpmrAB harboring various pmrAB variants. The number of pmrC transcripts of A. baumannii ΔpmrAB was related to that of A. baumannii ATCC 19606, as well as that of the knockout (ΔpmrAB) harboring pmrAB variants from ATCC 19606 (ΔpmrAB+19606), MB_2 (ΔpmrAB+MB_2), and MB_6C (ΔpmrAB+MB_6C), respectively. The number of transcripts was normalized to the expression of the reference gene rpoB, and the knockout was set as 1. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was done by performing an unpaired t test using the recorded absolute values. **, P < 0.01.

Since pmrC was overexpressed in ΔpmrAB harboring pJN17/04::pmrAB-6, the modification of lipid A was analyzed by mass spectrometry (Fig. 6). The same major lipid A species already described for the isolate pairs (m/z 1,404, 1,530, 1,728, and 1,910) were also detected in the pmrAB knockout strains. The addition of a single PEtN molecule indicated by the mass at m/z 2,034 was observed only in ΔpmrAB complemented with pJN17/04::pmrAB-6C (Fig. 6D), indicating that the pmrB mutation resulted both in increased pmrC expression and lipid A modification. Since the colistin MICs did not change, a different, hitherto unknown factor contributing to resistance or strain dependency are strongly suggested.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Mass spectra of lipid A extracted from A. baumannii ΔpmrAB strains. Represented are mass spectra in the range of m/z 1,650 to 2,200, and masses of important lipid A species are given in the spectra (24). (A) A. baumannii ΔpmrAB, (B) A. baumannii ΔpmrAB + pJN17/04::pmrAB-19606, (C) A. baumannii ΔpmrAB + pJN17/04::pmrAB-2, and (D) A. baumannii ΔpmrAB + pJN17/04::pmrAB-6C. An arrow indicates PEtN addition indicated by a mass at m/z 2,034.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have investigated colistin resistance in four isogenic isolate pairs of A. baumannii, which gives us the ability to analyze the resistance mechanisms in very similar genetic backgrounds and exclude typical genetic variations seen in epidemiologically unrelated strains. Similar approaches have been conducted by, e.g., Dahdouh et al., Durante-Mangoni et al., and Beceiro et al., the latter reporting pmrB mutations, increased pmrC expression, and lipid A modification in colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates (24, 34, 35). Many different amino acid substitutions or short amino acid deletions have been described in PmrB, both in clinical and in laboratory-derived A. baumannii isolates (14). We found three different single amino acid substitutions and one 4-amino acid deletion in PmrB. The substitutions S17R and A28V and the small deletion ΔL9-G12 are located in or in close proximity to the transmembrane domain of PmrB, which is involved in sensing extracellular stimuli and signal transduction. The substitution I232T is located near the histidine residue H228, which is important for autophosphorylation and transfer of the phosphoryl group (33, 36–38). Both locations are important for protein function, and substitutions/deletions in these regions are predicted to affect signal transduction and autophosphorylation (36).

To our knowledge, the substitutions A28V and I232T and the deletion ΔL9-G12 are derived from novel mutations in pmrB that have not been previously described. One would expect to see increased pmrC expression in these isolates, leading to the modification of lipid A through the addition of PEtN, which has been described several times before in the literature as a mechanism of colistin resistance (11, 13, 24). However, it seems that this rule cannot be applied to all isolates, and colistin resistance appears to be a much more complex mechanism than previously suspected. Only for the short amino acid deletion ΔL9-G12 in isolate pair 1 were the expected results of increased pmrC expression and PEtN addition to lipid A confirmed in this study. However, complementation of a pmrAB knockout with pmrAB harboring the deletion ΔL9-G12 did not result in colistin MIC changes, although pmrC expression was increased and lipid A modified. These data indicate the contribution of pmrB mutations to the upregulation of pmrC expression, but not necessarily to a phenotype change with regard to colistin susceptibility. Moreover, both isolates of isolate pair 3 were colistin resistant, but the amino acid substitution A28V in PmrB resulted in even higher colistin MICs and pmrC expression, which suggests an additive effect of mutations in pmrB, underlining the potential of mutation accumulation as a mechanism for increased antimicrobial resistance. In addition, a larger amount of PEtN added to lipid A is suggested in isolate MB_119, but it is likely that another factor contributes to the observed high-level resistance (39). Therefore, PEtN additions appear to be less crucial for a colistin-resistant phenotype than previously thought, and similar results were obtained for other isolate pairs. The amino acid substitution S17R in PmrB resulted in increased pmrC expression, which has been previously described in colistin-resistant isolates (38), but PEtN addition was detected in both isolates of isolate pair 4. The same has been observed for isolate pair 2, and although this can be partially explained by the involvement of eptA, these findings are rather surprising and have not been described in the literature so far. Furthermore, a pmrAB knockout complemented with pmrAB from isolate MB_6C displayed PEtN addition but no change in colistin MICs, which indicates that PEtN modification of lipid A is not the only factor contributing to colistin resistance. It is strongly suggested that another different and hitherto unknown factor(s) contributes to resistance (39), which so far cannot be explained by other allele differences detected in the isolate pairs. Another explanation might be a strain-specific effect of the mutation on pmrC expression (38), something that has also been observed with efflux and carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii (40–41).

In contrast to the other pmrB mutations, the substitution I232T in PmrB did not change pmrC expression. An amino acid change from threonine to isoleucine has been previously reported in the same position and was described to increase pmrC expression (38), which suggests the amino acid change I232T in PmrB does not affect the activity and autophosphorylation of the sensor kinase and is not associated with colistin resistance. Instead, the association of the pmrC homologue eptA with colistin resistance was suggested. The amino acid substitution R127L was detected in EptA, which might alter the efficiency and function of the enzyme. Moreover, ISAba1 was detected upstream of eptA in isolate pair 2, which explains PEtN addition to lipid A independently of pmrCAB. ISAba1 is known to provide a strong promoter for gene expression and a point mutation close to the −35 region, and the upstream promoter element (UP-element) could alter the promoter strength and therefore explain the differential expression of eptA in isolate pair 2 (42). Moreover, the presence of an insertion sequence indicates the possible dissemination of eptA between other isolates or bacterial species, as is frequently observed for β-lactamases (42). Besides pmrB, several allele differences were detected in isolate pair 2, two of which were located in putative transcription regulators. Both regulators could be involved in the regulation of eptA expression. In addition, an allele difference in the guanosine polyphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase/synthase (SpoT) was found. SpoT is involved in purine metabolism and synthesizes ppGpp, which has been described as a global transcriptional regulator in the stress response of bacteria and is associated with antimicrobial resistance in E. coli (43).

Several studies have described colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates with reduced fitness and impaired virulence (32, 33, 44, 45), while other studies are in agreement with our observation of unchanged fitness or growth characteristics (34–35). Retention of fitness and virulence in colistin-resistant isolates has been attributed to the mechanism of resistance. A fitness loss was often associated with mutations in lipid A biosynthesis genes and complete loss of LPS, while alterations in pmrCAB did not affect the fitness or virulence of A. baumannii (46). In our study, unchanged or increased virulence and melanization in G. mellonella larvae was detected in colistin-resistant isolates. High melanization scores are an indicator for an immune response of the host (G. mellonella). Our results revealed higher scores in larvae infected with A. baumannii isolates displaying high colistin MICs. Therefore, we propose a correlation between the mechanism of colistin resistance and virulence. pmrAB-mediated LPS modification has been described to play a role in virulence in other organisms, such as Salmonella spp., by altering the innate immune recognition (e.g., by reduction of Toll-like receptor-LPS interaction) (47). Moreover, LPS and lipid A have been discussed as potential virulence factors in A. baumannii, and LPS derived from A. baumannii has been shown to stimulate innate immune responses in humans via Toll-like receptor 4 signaling (48–49). Therefore, it is not unexpected that lipid A modifications can be associated with a change in virulence in A. baumannii. Increased virulence of colistin-resistant strains could also be partially due to cross-resistance to antimicrobial peptides naturally produced by G. mellonella larvae as part of their innate immunity (50). Resistance to these peptides would reduce the effectiveness of the animal’s immunity and thus result in the increased visible pathogenicity of the A. baumannii isolates.

In conclusion, we have identified four different pmrB mutations, three of which have not been described before (leading to A28V, I232T, and ΔL9-G12). All novel pmrB mutations were associated with increased virulence in G. mellonella. Furthermore, it was shown that pmrAB regulates pmrC expression and PEtN addition to lipid A, but that alone does not seem crucial for colistin resistance in A. baumannii. Instead, the association of the pmrC homologue eptA with colistin resistance was described, and a possible complex regulation of eptA expression is suggested. Nevertheless, the exact resistance mechanism for two isolates remains to be elucidated, as inconsistent results were obtained regarding PEtN addition, and the contribution of eptA to colistin resistance needs further investigation. These data open a window into the complexity of colistin resistance in A. baumannii, and more work is needed to fully understand the colistin resistance mechanisms in A. baumannii. Rather than a single rule for the mechanism of colistin resistance, it appears that strain-dependent factors must be taken into account. Moreover, a high cascade in the regulation of colistin resistance mechanisms, as found in other Gram-negative bacteria (14), could also be present in A. baumannii. Since this is still unknown, and global regulators are mostly unidentified, further analysis is required but beyond the scope of this work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

In total, 8 A. baumannii isolates were investigated. The isolates demonstrated an increase in colistin MIC by at least four dilution steps. In addition, isolates representing isolate pairs were required to demonstrate fewer than ten allele differences in core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST). The isolates were obtained from four patients hospitalized in Frankfurt (Germany; n = 1), Athens (Greece; n = 1), and Seville (Spain; n = 2). The isolates from Greece and Spain were recovered from respiratory tract or stool samples obtained from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) between 2012 and 2015 as part of the MagicBullet clinical trial (9, 18). The isolates from Germany were recovered from wound and respiratory samples obtained in 2016 from a stroke patient.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Susceptibility to colistin was determined by broth microdilution using premanufactured freeze-dried microtiter plates (Micronaut S Colistin plates; Merlin Diagnostika, Bornheim, Germany). The MIC was determined in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) according to the international standard ISO 20776-1 (19). Colistin resistance was defined as an MIC of >2mg/liter, using the EUCAST resistance breakpoints for A. baumannii. Susceptibility to tetracycline, gentamicin (Sigma–Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), amikacin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, rifampin, tigecycline (Molekula, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), levofloxacin (Sanofi Aventis, Frankfurt, Germany), azithromycin (Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany), and erythromycin (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) was determined by agar dilution following the current CLSI guidelines (20). All susceptibility tests were repeated at least three times independently. E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 were used as controls.

WGS and sequence data analysis.

All A. baumannii isolates were subjected to WGS (21). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina GmbH, Munich, Germany) for a 250-bp paired-end sequencing run on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. The resulting FASTQ files were quality trimmed and assembled de novo using Velvet with SeqSphere+ v.3.0 software (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany). The assembled genomes were aligned to the A. baumannii reference strain ACICU to determine differences in specific open reading frames in each draft genome sequence, as well as for cgMLST (21), and were further analyzed using ResFinder for resistome analysis (22). Besides the amino acid sequence of PmrCAB, the sequences of H-NS and of the LPS/lipid A biosynthesis components LpsB, LpxABCD, LpxHKLM, and KdtA/WaaA were compared between the isolates and to those of the reference strain ACICU.

PCR-based methods.

All primers used in this study were designed using Primer3 software (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/) and are listed in Table 2. Crude cell lysates or genomic DNA were used as the templates for PCR. Differences determined by WGS in pmrCAB and eptA between isolates of an isolate pair were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (LGC Genomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany).

TABLE 2.

List of oligonucleotides used in this study

Primer Sequence (5′ to 3′) Expt Reference or source
C65 GAGTCTAATGGCGGTGGTTC rpoB qRT-PCR 23
C66 ATTGCTTCATCTGCTGGTTG
J15 GGTGGAATGGGTCAATAACG pmrA qRT-PCR 11
J16 GGTGTTGCTGCTCTTTGACG 13
H52 TCGATGAAATTCTAGATACTCAAATG pmrB qRT-PCR 13
H53 CCCAAATATCGATAAACAGATCTTC
N3 TGTTGCTACCTATTATGCGG pmrC qRT-PCR This study
N4 ATTTTGAATTTGGTCGGGTG
L39 GATCGCGTTGAACAATATCA
L40 GCAATACAACTAACCGTGGA
N5 TCAGTTCTTTTCTTAGGGGC eptA qRT-PCR (together with N4)
H48 GCGAGGAGCACATTTCCTAA Sanger sequencing of pmrCAB 13
H49 TGTAGTCACTCACGATGCTGAA
H51 GGCAAAGCAAGATGTAACTTTAA
H54 TTGAAGCAGATCCGTCAAAG
H55 TGCACCCAAATTTAAACCATC
H57 ATGACAAAAATCTTGATGATTGAAGAT Sanger sequencing of pmrCAB 24
H58 TTATGATTGCCCCAAACGGTAG
H59 GTGCATTATTCATTAAAAAAAC
H62 CCTAAATCGATTTCTTTTTG
H64 TTAGTTTACATGGGCACAA
H65 GGTTGTTATTGAAGAAAGTAT
M80 CAAGGAGCCATCGTCATATA Sanger sequencing of eptA This study
M81 ATGGTGTTTATCCGGGTTAC
N1 CATAAGAAGGCTCCGAAGAA
N2 TGTCATCATAACATTCGCCA
N6 GAGCATTTCAACTGGGGATA
J76 AGAGCATCGAATTCCTCTACTTTAGCGTATGGTGC Markerless pmrAB knockout
J77 AAACAAGAGCTTACGGTTCTAGGCTCGCTTTAGTT
J78 AAGCGAGCCTAGAACCGTAAGCTCTTGTTTCACTT
J79 GTGGATCCCCCGGGCGGATTTTAATTGTCGGCTGG
K58 GCCACTCATCGCAGTAAACCGACTTGTGATACGAA In-Fusion cloning of pmrAB into pJN17/04 This study
K59 ATGAATTACAACAGTTAGGTTTCATGATGGGTTGG

Semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

To measure the expression of pmrCAB and eptA, qRT-PCR was performed as previously described, using rpoB as reference gene (25). The specificity of the pmrC and eptA primers were confirmed by PCR. All qRT-PCRs were done in triplicates using freshly prepared RNA and cDNA and were repeated independently at least three times. The relative expressions of pmrCAB and eptA were compared with either the isolates representing an isolate pair or with the pmrAB knockout strain, and statistical analysis was done by performing an unpaired t test using the recorded absolute values.

Markerless pmrAB knockout and cloning of pmrAB.

A pmrAB knockout was created as previously described by Stahl et al. (26), using A. baumannii ATCC 19606 as the parent strain. The upstream and downstream regions of pmrAB were integrated into plasmid pBIISK_sacBkanR using the In-Fusion HD EcoDry cloning kit (TaKaRa Clontech, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France) and primers J76 to J79 (Table 2). The successful deletion of pmrAB was confirmed by WGS. The pmrAB variants of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 as control and of isolates MB_2 and MB_6C were amplified using the primer pair K58 and K59 (Table 2), and the shuttle vector pJN17/04 was linearized as previously described (27). pmrAB was integrated into the plasmid using the In-Fusion HD EcoDry cloning kit. The plasmids pJN17/04::pmrAB-19606, pJN17/04::pmrAB-2, and pJN17/04::pmrAB-6C were introduced into A. baumannii ΔpmrAB by electroporation (27). Successful transformants were confirmed by PCR and maintained on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with 10 mg/liter kanamycin (Molekula, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK).

Lipid A extraction and mass spectrometry.

For LPS and lipid A extraction, all isolates and the reference strain A. baumannii ATCC 19606 were cultured in 250 ml of LB medium at 37°C and 220 rpm. To determine if the composition of lipid A varied between growth phases, the bacteria were cultured overnight or until the mid-log phase was reached (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], 0.7 to 0.9). The cultures were centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 15 min, and the cell pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Approximately 200 to 400 mg of the cell pellets were subjected to LPS extraction following the Tri Reagent method with three additional chloroform extraction steps (28). Mass spectrometry analysis was done using a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Biflex III; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Crude lipid A extract was resolved in chloroform:methanol:H2O (4:4:1 [vol/vol]) and subjected to an ultrasound bath for 20 min, followed by a centrifugation step at 13,000 rpm for 2 min. Aliquots of 1 μl sample were mixed 1:1 with the matrix (5-chloro-2-mercaptobenzothiazole and ammonium-EDTA), spotted directly onto the MALDI target plate, and dried in air. Mass spectra were measured using negative ion mode within a mass range of 500 to 3,000 Da (29).

Growth kinetics.

Growth kinetics were performed in triplicates as previously described (27). Briefly, a McFarland suspension of 0.5 generated from a fresh overnight culture was used to inoculate 10 ml Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth. The cultures were incubated for six hours at 37°C and 200 rpm, and a sample was taken every hour. Samples were serially diluted in cold saline and plated onto MH agar, and CFU per milliliter values were determined after overnight incubation.

In vivo virulence in G. mellonella.

The in vivo virulence of the A. baumannii isolates was investigated using the G. mellonella invertebrate model (TruLarv; Biosystems Technology, Exeter, UK) as previously described (30). For each A. baumannii isolate, 10 larvae were infected by injection with 105 CFU/larva of the respective isolate into the left proleg. PBS was used in the control injections. The larvae were incubated aerobically at 37°C and scored for survival (live/dead) at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postinfection. Moreover, the melanization scores were recorded as an indicator of morbidity (31). All assays were performed in triplicates and results were pooled for analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using an unpaired t test at 96 h, as described previously (30).

Accession number(s).

All raw reads generated were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the accession numbers SRP131448 and SRP155178, as well as under the BioProject accession number PRJNA482774.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
AAC.01586-18-s0001.pdf (276.1KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Beate Averhoff (Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) for providing us with the plasmid pBIISK_sacBkanR. Moreover, we gratefully acknowledge the support of Marc Sylvester and Bernd Gehrig (Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany) for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and José Garnacho-Montero, Clara Rosso-Fernández, Michael J. McConnell, M. Eugenia Pachon-Ibañez (University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain), and George Dimopoulos (University Hospital ATTIKO, Athens, Greece) for clinical specimen collection and handling of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

This work was supported by the German Research Council (DFG)–FOR2251 (www.acinetobacter.de). J. Nowak was supported by the MagicBullet study. MagicBullet is a project funded by the European Union–Directorate General for Research and Innovation through the Seventh Framework Program for Research and Development (grant agreement 278232) and has been running since 1 January 2012 (duration, 48 months). C. S. Nodari was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES; process number 88881.187573/2018-01).

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01586-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. 2008. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 21:538–582. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. 2007. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:939–951. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Villegas MV, Hartstein AI. 2003. Acinetobacter outbreaks 1977–2000. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:284–295. doi: 10.1086/502205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. 2017. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-T_NM_WHO.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koyama Y, Kurosasa A, Tsuchiya A, Takakuta K. 1950. A new antibiotic “colistin” produced by spore-forming soil bacteria. J Antibiot 3:457–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. 2005. Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 40:1333–1341. doi: 10.1086/429323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cai Y, Chai D, Wang R, Liang B, Bai N. 2012. Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1607–1615. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Göttig S, Gruber TM, Higgins PG, Wachsmuth M, Seifert H, Kempf VAJ. 2014. Detection of pan drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2578–2579. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nowak J, Zander E, Stefanik D, Higgins PG, Roca I, Vila J, McConnell MJ, Cisneros JM, Seifert H, MagicBullet Working Group WP4. 2017. High incidence of pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in Greece, Italy and Spain as part of the MagicBullet clinical trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:3277–3282. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kline T, Trent MS, Stead CM, Lee MS, Sousa MC, Felise HB, Nguyen HV, Miller SI. 2008. Synthesis of and evaluation of lipid A modification by 4-substituted 4-deoxy arabinose analogs as potential inhibitors of bacterial polymyxin resistance. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18:1507–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.12.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arroyo LA, Herrera CM, Fernandez L, Hankins JV, Trent MS, Hancock RE. 2011. The pmrABC operon mediates polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and clinical isolates through phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3743–3751. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00256-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pelletier MR, Casella LG, Jones JW, Adams MD, Zurawski DV, Hazlett KRO, Doi Y, Ernst RK. 2013. Unique structural modifications are present in the lipopolysaccharide from colistin-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4831–4840. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00865-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adams MD, Nickel GC, Bajaksouzian S, Lavender H, Murthy AR, Jacobs MR, Bonomo RA. 2009. Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3628–3634. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00284-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain JM. 2014. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol 5:643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moffatt JH, Harper M, Harrison P, Hale JDF, Vinogradov E, Seemann T, Henry R, Crane B, St Michael F, Cox AD, Adler B, Nation RL, Li J, Boyce JD. 2010. Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4971–4977. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00834-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deveson Lucas D, Crane B, Wright A, Han ML, Moffatt J, Bulach D, Gladman SL, Powell D, Aranda J, Seemann T, Machado D, Pacheco T, Marques T, Viveiros M, Nation R, Li J, Harper M, Boyce JD. 2018. Emergence of high-level colistin resistance in an Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolate mediated by inactivation of the global regulator H-NS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 26:e02442-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02442-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi L-X, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X, Yu L-F, Gu D, Ren H, Chen X, Lv L, He D, Zhou H, Liang Z, Liu J-H, Shen J. 2016. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:161–168. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rosso-Fernández C, Garnacho-Montero J, Antonelli M, Dimopoulos G, Cisneros JM, The MagicBullet study group. 2015. Safety and efficacy of colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia as part of the macro-project funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission studying off-patent antibiotics: study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Trials 16:102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0614-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.International Organization for Standardization. 2006. Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems—Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices—Part 1: reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against rapidly growing aerobic bacteria involved in infectious diseases. ISO 20776-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-eighth informational supplement. M100S-S28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Higgins PG, Prior K, Harmsen D, Seifert H. 2017. Development and evaluation of a core genome multilocus typing scheme for whole-genome sequence-based typing of Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One 12:e0179228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hornsey M, Ellington MJ, Doumith M, Thomas CP, Gordon NC, Wareham DW, Quinn J, Lolans K, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2010. AdeABC-mediated efflux and tigecycline MICs for epidemic clones of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1589–1593. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beceiro A, Llobet E, Aranda J, Bengoechea JA, Doumith M, Hornsey M, Dhanji H, Chart H, Bou G, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2011. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3370–3379. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00079-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Higgins PG, Schneiders T, Hamprecht A, Seifert H. 2010. In vivo selection of a missense mutation in adeR and conversion of the novel blaOXA-164 gene into blaOXA-58 in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a hospitalized patient. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5021–5027. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00598-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stahl J, Bergmann H, Göttig S, Ebersberger I, Averhoff B. 2015. Acinetobacter baumannii virulence is mediated by the concerted action of three phospholipases D. PLoS One 10:e0138360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nowak J, Schneiders T, Seifert H, Higgins PG. 2016. The Asp20-to-Asn substitution in the response regulator AdeR leads to enhanced efflux activity of AdeB in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1085–1090. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02413-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yi EC, Hackett M. 2000. Rapid isolation method for lipopolysaccharide and lipid A from Gram-negative bacteria. Analyst 125:651–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Segev-Zarko LA, Kapach G, Josten M, Klug YA, Sahl HG, Shai Y. 2018. Deficient lipid A remodeling by the arnB gene promotes biofilm formation in antimicrobial peptide susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry 57:2024–2034. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Betts JW, Hornsey M, Wareham DW, La Ragione RM. 2017. In vitro and in vivo activity of theaflavin-epicatechin combinations versus multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Dis Ther 6:435–442. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0161-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsai CJ, Loh JM, Proft T. 2016. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence 7:214–229. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1135289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pournaras S, Poulou A, Dafopoulou K, Chabane YN, Kristo I, Makris D, Hardouin J, Cosette P, Tsakris A, Dé E. 2014. Growth retardation, reduced invasiveness and impaired colistin-mediated cell death associated with colistin resistance development in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:828–832. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01439-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.López-Rojas R, Domínguez-Herrera J, McConnell MJ, Docobo-Peréz F, Smani Y, Fernández-Reyes M, Rivas L, Pachón J. 2011. Impaired virulence and in vivo fitness of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Infect Dis 203:545–548. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dahdouh E, Gómez-Gil R, Sanz S, González-Zorn B, Daoud Z, Mingorance J, Suárez M. 2017. A novel mutation in pmrB mediates colistin resistance during therapy of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:727–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Durante-Mangoni E, Del Franco M, Andini R, Bernardo M, Giannouli M, Zarrilli R. 2015. Emergence of colistin resistance without loss of fitness and virulence after prolonged colistin administration in a patient with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 82:222–226. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gao R, Stock AM. 2009. Biological insights from structures of two-component proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:133–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casino P, Rubio V, Marina A. 2010. The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol 20:763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lesho E, Yoon E-J, McGann P, Snesrud E, Kwak Y, Milillo M, Onmus-Leone F, Preston L, St Clair K, Nikolich M, Viscount H, Wortmann G, Zapor M, Grillot-Courvalin C, Courvalin P, Clifford R, Waterman PE. 2013. Emergence of colistin-resistance in extremely drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii containing a novel pmrCAB operon during colistin therapy of wound infections. J Infect Dis 208:1142–1151. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jeannot K, Bolard A, Plésiat P. 2017. Resistance to polymyxins in Gram-negative organisms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Richmond GE, Evans LP, Anderson MJ, Wand ME, Bonney LC, Ivens A, Chua KL, Webber MA, Sutton JM, Peterson ML, Piddock LJ. 2016. The Acinetobacter baumannii two-component system AdeRS regulates genes required for multidrug efflux, biofilm formation, and virulence in a strain-specific manner. mBio 7:e00430-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00430-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zander E, Seifert H, Higgins PG. 2016. Effects of saline, an ambient acidic environment, and sodium salicylate on OXA-mediated carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3415–3418. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03010-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Turton JF, Ward ME, Woodford N, Kaufmann ME, Pike R, Livermore DM, Pitt TL. 2006. The role of ISAba1 in expression of OXA carbapenemase genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 258:72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu J, Long Q, Xie J. 2010. (p)ppGpp and drug resistance. J Cell Physiol 224:300–304. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.López-Rojas R, McConnell MJ, Jiménez-Mejías ME, Domínguez-Herrera J, Fernández-Cuenca F, Pachón J. 2013. Colistin resistance in a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strain appearing after colistin treatment: effect on virulence and bacterial fitness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4587–4589. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00543-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rolain JM, Roch A, Castanier M, Papazian L, Raoult D. 2011. Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to colistin with impaired virulence: a case report from France. J Infect Dis 204:1146–1147. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wand ME, Bock LJ, Bonney LC, Sutton JM. 2015. Retention of virulence following adaptation to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii reflects the mechanism of resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:2209–2216. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gunn JS. 2008. The Salmonella PmrAB regulon: lipopolysaccharide modifications, antimicrobial peptide resistance and more. Trends Microbiol 16:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Eijkelkamp BA, Stroeher UH, Hassan KA, Paulsen IT, Brown MH. 2014. Comparative analysis of surface-exposed virulence factors of Acinetobacter baumannii. BMC Genomics 15:1020–1032. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Erridge C, Moncayo-Nieto OL, Morgan R, Young M, Poxton IR. 2007. Acinetobacter baumannii lipopolysaccharides are potent stimulators of human monocyte activation via Toll-like receptor 4 signalling. J Med Microbiol 56:165–171. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46823-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Brown SE, Howard A, Kasprzak AB, Gordon KH, East PD. 2009. A peptidomics study reveals the impressive antimicrobial peptide arsenal of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 39:792–800. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
AAC.01586-18-s0001.pdf (276.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES