Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar 6;15(3):289–295. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2012.7

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients enrolled on study

S-IL-2 (n = 18) M-IL-2 (n = 18) Placebo (n = 7) P-value
Age
 Median (range) 60 (50 – 78) 63 (50 – 75) 67 (60 – 73) 0.30a
 Mean (s.d.) 62 (8.8) 62 (8.6) 67 (5.2)
PSA at diagnosis
 Median (range) 14.5 (3.8 – 206) 9.6 (4 – 187) 8.9 (5.5 – 23) 0.63a
 Mean (s.d.) 38 (54.0) 28 (46.0) 11.8 (6.6)
Clinical T stage
 T1 33% 44% 43% 0.63a
 T2 50% 39% 14%
 T3 17% 17% 43%
Gleason score
 5 11% 0% 0% 0.47a
 6 22% 22% 29%
 7 28% 39% 71%
 8 17% 22% 0%
 9 22% 17% 0%
NCCN risk group
 Low 17% 17% 14% 0.92a
 Intermediate 22% 28% 29%
 High 61% 55% 57%
 Node-positive 17% 28% 0% 0.34
 Received ADT 83% 83% 86% 1.00
 Median EBRT dose Gy (range)b 73 (68 – 76) 74 (70 – 76) 74 (73 – 76.4) 0.80a
 Treated with brachytherapy 0% 22% 14% 0.12

Abbreviations: ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; IL, interleukin; M-IL-2, metronomic dose IL-2; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; S-IL-2, standard dose IL-2; T, tumor size.

a

Compared among groups by Kruskal - Wallis test; others were by Mehta’s modification to Fisher’s exact test.

b

Excludes four patients treated with EBRT plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost.