Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;5(1):HEP01. doi: 10.2217/hep-2017-0020

Table 1. . Failed Phase III randomized clinical trials investigating drugs for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable for locoregional treatments.

Name of the trial Study drug Therapeutic line Primary end point
No name Linifanib vs sorafenib 1 No difference in OS (HR: 1.046; 95% CI: 0.896–1.221)

SEARCH Sorafenib + erlotinib vs sorafenib + placebo 1 No difference in OS (HR: 0.929; 95% CI: 0.781–1.106; p = 0.408)

No name Sunitinib vs sorafenib 1 Significant inferiority in OS (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.13–1.50; p = 0.014)

BRISK-FL Brivanib vs sorafenib 1 No difference in OS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93–1.22)

BRISK-PS Brivanib vs placebo 2 No difference in OS (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69–1.15; p = 0.33)

REACH Ramucirumab vs placebo 2 No difference in OS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.72–1.05; p = 0.14)

EVOLVE-1 Everolimus vs placebo 2 No difference in OS (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86–1.27; p = 0.68)

POLARIS2009-001 ADI-PEG20 vs placebo 2 No difference in OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.85–1.23; p = 0.88)

METIV-HCC Tivantinib vs placebo 2 No difference in OS (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.75–1.25; p = 0.81)

JET-HCC Tivantinib vs placebo 2 No difference in PFS (further data still not released)

HR: Hazard ratio; OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival.