Table 5.
Results from random-effects meta-analyses for the association between exposure to and breast cancer incidence in 15 European cohorts: The sensitivity analyses.
| Cohorts | HR (95% CI) | (p-value)a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main model | 11 | 68,806 | 1.08 (0.77, 1.51) | 56.7 (0.03) |
| Excluding VHM&PP (poor covariate adjustment) | 10 | 55,419 | 1.28 (0.99, 1.65) | 0.0 (0.71) |
| Including cohorts with all breast cancer risk factors (Model 3) | 3b | 25,014 | 1.35 (0.96, 1.90) | 0.0 (0.91) |
| Restricted to long-term residents | 7c | 37,150 | 2.19 (0.29, 16.58) | 75.9 () |
| Restricted to nonmovers | 8d | 44,449 | 1.01 (0.22, 4.74) | 62.8 (0.03) |
| Further adjustment for urbanization | 9e | 57,286 | 1.20 (0.18, 7.86) | 75.4 () |
| Variables that do not meet PH assumption as strata | 11 | 68,806 | 1.21 (0.23, 6.40) | 72.3 () |
| Excluding cohorts with of original cohort excluded | 10f | 54,559 | 0.99 (0.67, 1.48) | 64.5 (0.02) |
Note: CEANS, Cardiovascular Effects of Air Pollution and Noise in Stockholm; CI, confidence interval; DCH, Danish Diet, Health and Cancer cohort; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; EPIC-E3N, French cohort of the Etude Epidemiologique de Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale; HR, hazard ratio; HUBRO, Oslo Health Study; PH, proportional hazard; , particulate matter ; VHM&PP, Vorarlberg Health Monitoring and Prevention Programme..
Cochran’s test for heterogeneity for Model 3 of effect estimates between the cohorts.
Three cohorts with information on PM and all breast cancer risk factors: DCH, EPIC-Varese, and EPIC-Turin.
Seven cohorts: HUBRO, CEANS (4 Swedish cohorts pooled), DCH, and VHM&PP.
Eight cohorts: HUBRO, CEANS (4 Swedish cohorts pooled), DCH, EPIC-Oxford, and VHM&PP.
Nine cohorts: CEANS (4 Swedish cohorts pooled), DCH, EPIC-Oxford, EPIC-Netherlands (2 Dutch cohorts pooled), and VHM&PP.
Ten cohorts: CEANS (4 Swedish cohorts pooled), DCH, EPIC-Oxford, EPIC-Netherlands (2 Dutch cohorts pooled), VHM&PP, EPIC-Turin.