Table 3.
Unadjusted and Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Developing ESRD in Patients with moderate to severe TID vs. none or mild TID.
| Unadjusted | Adjusted* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Overall sample | 5.2 (2.0, 13.4) | 0.001 | 4.1 (1.4, 12.1) | 0.01 |
| In the subset of patients with GFR≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 | 6.4 (1.7, 23.7) | 0.006 | 6.2** (1.7, 23.2) | 0.008 |
| Excluding class I/II LN | 4.7 (1.8, 12.3) | 0.001 | 3.9 (1.3, 11.7) | 0.02 |
| In the subset of patients with proliferative LN | 3.6 (1.3, 10.0) | 0.01 | 4.6***(1.4,14.8) | 0.01 |
| Excluding patients younger than 17 years old | 5.0 (1.8, 14.4) | 0.003 | 3.4 (1.1, 10.9) | 0.04 |
| Excluding 11 patients with < 1 year follow-up time | 3.8 (1.2, 11.6) | 0.02 | 4.0 (1.3, 12.5) | 0.02 |
| Adding TII into the models | 3.8 (1.2, 11.5) (HR for TII 0.54 (0.15, 2.0), p=0.35) | 0.002 | ||
| Including 14 patients with LN on biopsy, but insufficient information to verify ACR/SLICC criteria | 5.1 (2.0, 13.3) | 0.001 | 4.3 (1.5, 12.9) | 0.008 |
All models were adjusted for age, eGFR as a continuous variable, and LN class (proliferative vs. other), unless otherwise specified
Adjusted for age only
Adjusted for age and eGFR as a continuous variable