Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Jul 14;47(4):545–551. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.07.007

Table 3.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Developing ESRD in Patients with moderate to severe TID vs. none or mild TID.

Unadjusted Adjusted*
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Overall sample 5.2 (2.0, 13.4) 0.001 4.1 (1.4, 12.1) 0.01
In the subset of patients with GFR≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 6.4 (1.7, 23.7) 0.006 6.2** (1.7, 23.2) 0.008
Excluding class I/II LN 4.7 (1.8, 12.3) 0.001 3.9 (1.3, 11.7) 0.02
In the subset of patients with proliferative LN 3.6 (1.3, 10.0) 0.01 4.6***(1.4,14.8) 0.01
Excluding patients younger than 17 years old 5.0 (1.8, 14.4) 0.003 3.4 (1.1, 10.9) 0.04
Excluding 11 patients with < 1 year follow-up time 3.8 (1.2, 11.6) 0.02 4.0 (1.3, 12.5) 0.02
Adding TII into the models 3.8 (1.2, 11.5) (HR for TII 0.54 (0.15, 2.0), p=0.35) 0.002
Including 14 patients with LN on biopsy, but insufficient information to verify ACR/SLICC criteria 5.1 (2.0, 13.3) 0.001 4.3 (1.5, 12.9) 0.008
*

All models were adjusted for age, eGFR as a continuous variable, and LN class (proliferative vs. other), unless otherwise specified

**

Adjusted for age only

***

Adjusted for age and eGFR as a continuous variable