Abstract
Oxytocin (OT) and arginine-vasopressin (AVP) mediate fundamental functions in humans via four G protein-coupled receptors that are also involved in high-profile disorders. Therapeutic development has proven difficult due to the challenge of obtaining ligands that conserve selectivity across rodents and humans for translational studies. A medicinal chemistry strategy aimed at single atom modifications to the pharmacophore framework of OT and AVP yielded a more stable OT receptor (OTR) agonist that overcomes this hurdle: [Se-Se]-OT-OH has similar potency to OT, yet improved selectivity for OTR. This is conserved in mice, making it a powerful probe for distinguishing OTR against the V1a/V1b receptors. This was validated in vivo, where centrally infused [Se-Se]-OT-OH potently reversed social fear in mice, confirming that this action is mediated via OTR and not AVP receptors. [Se-Se]-OT-OH was furthermore tested in a preclinical labor induction/augmentation model, where it produced a more regular human uterine contraction pattern than OT with no activity at human cardiomyocytes, indicating an improved safety profile and therapeutic window compared to clinically used OT. Taken together, [Se-Se]-OT-OH is a novel and valuable probe to validate OTR as a therapeutic target in a wide range of biological systems and a promising new lead for new therapeutic candidate development. This medicinal chemistry approach which employs selenocysteine building blocks is highly applicable to similar complex peptidergic signaling systems that also struggle with selectivity issues.
Introduction
Oxytocin (OT) and vasopressin (arginine-vasopressin, AVP) are closely related, multifunctional neurohypophysial neuropeptides. This family of neurohormones is mainly synthesized in the magnocellular and parvocellular neurons of the hypothalamus, stored in the neurohypophysis and released into systemic circulation after enzymatic cleavage in response to relevant physiological stimuli (1, 2). In the periphery, OT is involved in uterine smooth muscle contraction during parturition, milk ejection during lactation, ejaculation, and pain (3–5), while centrally released OT functions as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator that promotes multiple behaviors (6–8), maternal care (9, 10), partnership bonding (8, 11, 12), social interactions (12), and stress and anxiety responses (13–15) mostly studied in rodents. A broad variety of behavioral effects were also described in humans through intranasal administration of OT, which led recently to a spike in clinical trials that study intranasal OT as a potential treatment option for psychopathologies characterized by social or emotional dysfunctions (14, 16–21). In contrast, AVP regulates fluid balance and blood pressure in the periphery (22–24); centrally released AVP is implicated in learning and memory (25–27), various social behaviors including pair bonding and aggression in rodents (6, 8, 28, 29), and in stress-related and anxiety disorders (28–30). The ubiquitous presence and involvement of the OT/AVP signaling system in so many diverse and fundamental physiological functions reflects its ancient character dating back at least 600 million years (8, 31). The OT/AVP receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family (5, 32) and form attractive targets for a diverse range of high-profile disorders including cancer, pain, autism, schizophrenia, anxiety- and stress-related disorders, and reproductive and cardiovascular disorders (5, 8, 16, 33).
In humans and rodents, OT acts via one oxytocin receptor (OTR) and AVP via three vasopressin receptors (AVPRs – vasopressor V1aR, pituitary V1bR, renal/antidiuretic V2R). OT and AVP are structurally very similar nonapeptides differing only by two amino acids in position 3 and 8 (Figure 1A). Two cysteine residues in position 1 and 6 form the cyclic part of the molecules followed by a 3-residue amidated C-terminal tail. Their chemical similarity together with the high sequence homology of the extracellular binding domains of the OTR and AVPRs (~80%) leads to significant cross talk, with OT able to activate the AVPRs and AVP the OTR (34, 35). Specific receptor functionality is thus not controlled by ligand selectivity, but by a complex system of cell-specific up and down regulation of individual receptor expression, controlled release, receptor oligomerization, rapid clearance and enzymatic degradation (36). High OT/AVP receptor homology and overlapping distribution constitute a major hurdle in the development of selective receptor agonists, antagonists and therapeutic candidates (37, 38). The identification of drug leads is further complicated by significant species differences, where rodent and human selectivity typically do not overlap (Table 1) thus restricting translation into the clinic (37–39). For example, OT/AVP analogues used clinically that include desmopressin (40, 41), carbetocin (42) and atosiban (37, 43, 44) were shown to be receptor-subtype selective in rats though not in humans (Table 1); and it is mainly due to rapid biodegradation, renal clearance and a limited administration window that they can be used clinically without severe side effects (40, 44). Despite these limitations, OT remains the ligand of 'choice' in the clinic to induce and progress labor (45). The lack of a complete set of selective receptor agonists/antagonists (Table 2) further limits our ability to characterize the physiological responses for each subtype receptor and their relevance in disease. Hence we commenced a program to overcome these limitations and yield better and more selective ligands for this fundamental signaling system (31, 46–50). In this study, we demonstrate that small modifications to the structural framework of the pharmacophore of the endogenous and pharmacologically unselective neuropeptides can be used to tune selectivity and generate analogues with an improved selectivity profile that is conserved across species (mouse and human), thereby facilitating future translational studies.
Figure 1. SAR study of OT/AVP with a focus on pharmacophore framework modifications.
A NMR structure of OT and framework residues marked in red that were the focus of this study. The table provides an overview of all synthesized peptides with details on their SAR modifications. U…selenocysteine; d…deamino (N-terminus); Δ…deletion of residue; bold…modification; P…position; term…terminus. B Synthesis of selenocysteine building blocks for Boc-SPPS to enable sulfur to selenium replacements. C & D Functional screen of OT analogues 1-10 (C) and AVP analogues 11-16 (D) at human OTR, V1aR, V1bR (FLIPR Ca2+ signaling assay) and V2R (cAMP assay). Bar graphs illustrate selectivity gains across all four receptors with increased bars indicating loss of function at that particular receptor. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (red) displayed remarkable selectivity gains for hOTR with >300-fold loss of potency at hV1aR and hV1bR. The last line (beige) illustrates how modifications affected potency compared to OT at hOTR and AVP at hV2R (black). E Functional follow-up study for OT analogues 1-7 using second messenger IP1 signaling for human OTR, V1aR and V1bR (V2R same cAMP values as in C) confirming the selectivity gains of [Se-Se]-OT-OH. For exact EC50 values please refer to SI Table S2 & S3.
Table 1.
Overview of commonly used molecular probes and the long-standing problem of producing ligands that retain selectivity across species for translational studies.
| Ligand | Species | Selectivity | Subtype preference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin | human | unselective | OT≈V1a>>V1b≈V2 |
| mouse | OT preference | OT>V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| rat | OT preference | OT>V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| Vasopressin | human | unselective | OT≈V1a≈V1b≈V2 |
| mouse | unselective | OT≈V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| rat | unselective | OT≈V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| Atosiban | human | V1a preference | V1a>OT≈V1b>V2 |
| mouse | OT selective | OT>>V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| rat | unselective | OT≈V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| T4G7-OT | human | OT preference | OT>V1a>V1b≈V2 |
| mouse | OT selective | OT>>V1a≈V1b | |
| rat | OT selective | OT>>V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
| d[Cha4]-AVP | human | V1b selective | V1b>>V1a≈OT≈V2 |
| rat | unselective | V1b≈V2>>OT≈V1a | |
| F-180 | human | V1a preference | V1a>OT≈V1b>V2 |
| rat | unselective | V1a≈V1b≈V2 | |
Table 2.
Molecular probes to study the OT/AVP receptor system. For ligands to be called selective they need to be tested across all four receptor subtypes and display at least 100-fold selectivity compared to the other three receptor subtypes. As seen in this table, there still exists an urgent need for selective agonists and antagonists, preferably ligands that retain their selectivity profile across species. Reported Ki values are listed in parentheses in nM.
| Selective Agonists | Subtype | Selective Antagonists |
|---|---|---|
| carba-1-[4-FBzlGly7]-dOT (FE 202767) (0.08)a | human OTR | SSR126768 (0.9) |
| [Thr4,Gly7]-OT (1.0) | rat OTR | |
| mouse OTR | ||
| [Phe2,Ile3,Hgn4,Orn(iPr)8]-VP (FE 202158) (4.4)b, [Hmp1,Phe2,Ile3,Hgn4,Dab8]-VP (F-180) (11.7) | human V1aR | d(CH2)5[D-Ile2,Ile4,Tyr9]-AVP (3.7), SR49059 (0.9) |
| rat V1aR | d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]-AVP (0.7), SR49049 (2.2) | |
| mouse V1aR | ||
| d[Cha4]-AVP (1.2) | human V1bR | Org52186 (4.0) |
| d[Leu4, Lys8]-VP (1.2) | rat V1bR | SSR149415 (1.3)c |
| mouse V1bR | ||
| human V2R | SR121463 (4.1) | |
| dDAVP (0.3) | rat V2R | SR121463 (1.5) |
| mouse V2R | SR121463 (11.2) | |
Table was adapted from Chini et al.(38).
d … N-terminal deamination; carba-1 … S to CH2 replacement for Cys1; d(CH2)5 … β-mercapto-β,β-cyclopenthamethylenepropionic acid was used instead of Cys1; desGly … desglycineamide; Orn … ornithine; Tyr(Me) … O-methyltyrosine; 4-FBzlGly … N-(4-fluorobenzyl)glycine; iPr … isopropyl; Hmp … 2-hydroxy-3-mercaptopropionic acid; Hgn … homoglutamine; Dab … 2,4-diaminobutyric acid
References for new ligands: a … (96) [only EC50 determined, no Ki]; b … (100, 101)
c … correction for SSR149415: SSR149415 is a selective V1bR antagonist for rat but not for mice, as it was reported in Chini et al.(38) (<100-fold selectivity in mice mV1bR vs. mV1a) (102, 103).
Results
Sixteen OT and AVP analogues with framework modifications including N-terminal deamination, C-terminal amide to acid change, deletion of residues 8 and 9, and disulfide bond replacement with the structurally isosteric yet slightly more hydrophobic and longer (0.3 Å, (51, 52)) diselenide bond were synthesized (Figure 1A, SI Table S1). The analogues were assessed for activity and selectivity at the human (h) OT, V1a, V1b and V2 receptors. Analysis of their structure-activity relationships (SAR) revealed that these modifications can lead to selectivity gains and revealed a valuable new ligand with significantly improved selectivity for OTR ([Se-Se]-OT-OH, 6, >1400-fold to hV1aR, 500-fold to hV1bR, 15-fold to hV2R). This compound along with eight others (compounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12) was chosen for a comprehensive pharmacological characterization that included radioligand displacement assays, Schild regression analysis, functional signaling assays, and human myometrial contraction assays to reveal the structural changes underlying the observed improvement in selectivity. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) plus d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) were then evaluated across all four murine (m) receptors to confirm whether activity and selectivity were conserved across species. Finally, the most selective compound, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6), was assessed to modulate OTR action centrally in a mouse model of social fear, peripherally to induce and augment labor via human uterine contraction assays, and its stability was determined in human serum. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) was furthermore tested along with OT (1) and AVP (11) on human heart muscle cells to assess its cardiovascular safety profile.
Rationale for single atom modifications
Based on structural data of OT (beta-turn stabilized by disulfide) (4, 47, 53–55) and earlier studies (37, 49, 56, 57), it is known that OT/AVP binding and receptor activation are sensitive even to minor modifications (e.g. ring reduction by one sulfur atom or disulfide bond replacement by a dicarba bridge causes complete loss of activity (56); Gly9 to Val9 exchange causes agonist to antagonist switch (49); see further details in Supplementary Note 1 in SI). Additionally, traditional medicinal chemistry strategies that modified residues within the loop pharmacophore resulted in selectivity improvements that were not retained across species (Table 1) (37, 38). Based on these observations, we selected a range of single atom modifications of the pharmacophore framework (i.e. disulfide bridge and N/C-terminus modifications summarized in Figure 1A and SI Table S1) to test the hypothesis that subtle framework modifications can yield selectivity gains that are retained across species.
Peptide synthesis
Two building blocks [Boc-L-Sec(Meb)-OH and dSec(Meb)-OH] were synthesized to access the desired sulfur/selenium modifications (Figure 1A & B, SI Table S1). To acquire Boc-L-Sec(Meb)-OH in desirable quantities, the protocols of Chocat et al. (58), Tanaka et al. (59) and Oikawa et al. (60) were optimized with the new synthetic chemistry able to provide 28.7 g of pure Boc-L-Sec(Meb)-OH in only three steps (Figure 1B, 62% overall yield, four days). A new synthetic strategy was also devised for dSec(Meb)-OH yielding the compound in a two-step synthesis with an overall yield of 12% (Figure 1B). With these building blocks in hand, all of the OT/AVP analogues 1-16 (Figure 1A, SI Table S1) were synthesized via Boc-SPPS using the HBTU-mediated in situ neutralization chemistry (51, 61), folded in 0.1M NH4HCO3 and purified by RP-HPLC.
Functional response of novel OT/AVP ligands
Agonist activity at the human OT, V1a and V1b receptors was determined using a Fluorescent Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR) Ca2+ mobilization assay, and activity at hV2R was determined by measuring the production of second messenger cAMP upon receptor stimulation (Figure 1C & D, SI Table S2).
OT was able to activate all four receptors, yet with EC50 10-300 fold higher at the hAVPRs (hOTR<hV2R<hV1bR<hV1aR) than at hOTR (0.52 nM). Deletion of the N-terminal amino group (dOT, 2) improved activation at all of the AVPRs. Replacement of the disulfide bond with the isosteric, yet slightly more hydrophobic diselenide bond, ([Se-Se]-OT (3), d[Se-Se]-OT (4)) was well tolerated and did not lead to significant changes in EC50. Exchange of the C-terminal amide to acid in OT (OT-OH, 5) resulted in weaker potency at all receptors and truncations of the C-terminus of OT (8, 9, 10) yielded higher EC50 at all receptors with complete loss of activity at hV2R (up to 10 μM).
AVP also activated all four receptors including hOTR (hV2R>hV1bR>hV1aR>hOTR). Deamination of the N-terminus (dAVP, 12) had little impact on receptor activation with EC50 values similar to AVP. The disulfide to diselenide exchange ([Se-Se]-AVP (13) and d[Se-Se]-AVP (14)) was again well tolerated and did not change the potency/selectivity profile significantly. Truncations of the C-terminus of AVP (15, 16) led to significant loss in potency over all four receptors (Figure 1D, SI Table S2).
Interestingly, the combination of diselenide replacement and C-terminal amide to acid change yielded a partial (Emax=52%) agonist ([Se-Se]-OT-OH, 6) with low nanomolar potency at hOTR (7.3 nM), no activation of hV1aR (>10 μM), a 600-fold higher EC50 at hV1bR (4319 nM) and a 15-fold higher EC50 at hV2R (109 nM). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) was found to be a weak antagonist at hV1aR (17% inhibition), with an IC50 of 132 nM (SI Figure S1), which was confirmed in a radioligand displacement assay (Figure 2D). Based on earlier SAR studies (37, 57, 62) it is known that N-terminal deamination of OT analogues often leads to improved OTR activation; hence we synthesized and assessed whether d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) potency and selectivity for hOTR was improved. d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) (again a partial agonist at hOTR with Emax=59%), however, did not improve potency at OTR, yet improved potency at all three AVPRs thus yielding a less interesting selectivity profile than [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) (Figure 1C, SI Table S2).
Figure 2. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) characterization over all four human OT/AVP receptors.
A Representative concentration-response curves of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) at the human OT, V1a and V1b receptors measuring calcium signaling using a FLIPR. B Representative concentration-response curves of OT, AVP and [Se-Se]-OT-OH at hV2R measuring the production of cAMP. C Representative concentration-response curves of [Se-Se]-OT-OH at the hOTR, hV1aR and hV1bR measuring the IP1 production. D Representative concentration-response curve of the radioligand displacement assay of [Se-Se]-OT-OH at human OT, V1a, V1b and V2 receptors. All curves were normalized to % of response of control ligand (OT for OTR, AVP for AVPRs). Data is presented as means ± SEM of results obtained from at least three separate experiments, each performed in triplicate.
OT analogues 1-7, AVP and dAVP (11,12) were further tested using the homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) inositol-1-phosphate (IP1) functional assay to allow comparison with the downstream intracellular calcium changes measured using the FLIPR (Figure 1E, SI Table S3). The HTRF-IP1 assay correlated well with the FLIPR assay (SI Table S5 and Supplementary Note 2 in SI) and the potency and selectivity trends, particularly with lead compound [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) (Figure 2C), were confirmed. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) displayed again partial agonism (Emax=60%) at hOTR with an EC50 of 38 nM (2.6-fold less potent than OT) and no activity at hV1aR and hV1bR at concentrations up to 10 μM.
Radioligand displacement assay at human OT, V1a, V1b, and V2 receptors
Binding data for compounds 1-7 and 11, 12 were obtained in radioligand displacement assays measuring the competition with 3H-OT at hOTR,125I-V1a antagonist at hV1aR, and 3H-AVP at the human V1b and V2 receptors in cell membrane preparations of heterologously expressed receptor (SI Table S4). The experimental inhibition constants (Ki) correlated well with the functional data (SI Table S2 & S3). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) displaced 125I-V1a antagonist at hV1aR with a Ki of 57 nM, confirming the weak antagonistic effects observed in the FLIPR assay (Figure 2D and SI Table S4).
Schild regression analysis for binding mode
To confirm competitive binding of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) at hOTR, we performed a series of Schild regression experiments with OT (1) and [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) against the well-characterized hOTR antagonist atosiban (AT). Results of these experiments revealed that all three compounds were competitive agonists at hOTR (SI Figure S2).
[Se-Se]-OT-OH - a stable and selective OTR agonist for translational studies
Considering that [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) is one of the most selective OTR agonists to date and represents an important molecular probe to study OTR, it was important to (i) prove the hypothesis that subtle pharmacophore framework modifications can yield selectivity gains that are conserved across murine and human receptors, (ii) characterize its activity in a physiological and clinical relevant setting, (iii) determine its metabolic stability compared to OT (which is used in the clinic) and (iv) assess its cardiovascular side effect profile. We therefore carried out the pharmacological characterization of 6 across the four murine receptors (i), analyzed its role in central modulation of social anxiety/fear and tested it in one of the most important clinical applications of OT, namely labor induction/augmentation (ii), determined its stability in human serum (iii), and characterized its ability to activate cardiomyocytes that are linked to known cardiovascular side effects (iv).
Binding and functional analysis at murine OT, V1a, V1b and V2 receptors (i)
To determine if the pharmacological profile observed in human receptors is retained in mice, we tested [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) and d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) in functional (SI Table S3, SI Figure S3) and binding assays (SI Table S4, SI Figure S4) across the four murine receptor subtypes.
[Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) retained its functional selectivity for OTR in mice and was inactive at mV1aR and mV1bR up to concentrations of 10 μM (SI Table S3, SI Figure S3). It was able to activate mOTR with an EC50=11.9 nM (Emax=43%), which is only slightly less potent in respect to OT (63). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) fully activated mV2R similarly to the human receptors – with an EC50 (183 nM) that is ~1000-fold larger compared to AVP (64) and 60-fold compared to OT (64). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) bound to the mOTR with a Ki=32.6 nM and we observed bi-phasic binding curves for mV2R (Ki1=0.71 nM and Ki2=1855 nM) and mV1aR (antagonist; Ki1=16.3 nM, Ki2 >10 μM). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) was characterized by very low affinity binding for mV1bR (Ki >10 μM), which correlates well with the absence of activation (SI Table S4, SI Figure S3).
d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) also retained its selectivity profile in mice, again being less selective than [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6). Binding and functional activation was observed at all four murine receptors subtypes, including V1b, which displayed no binding/activity with [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) (SI Table S3 & S4). d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) is a partial agonist at mOTR (EC50=5.9 nM; Emax=38%) and at the mV1bR (EC50=438 nM; Emax=68%), and a full agonist at mV1aR (EC50=438 nM) and at mV2R (EC50=41.6 nM). The binding affinity for mOTR was in the nanomolar range (Ki=5.9 nM), similar to OT (Ki=0.83 nM, (63)), and binding affinities for mV1aR and mV1bR were less potent, with Ki=293 nM and Ki=438 nM respectively. The binding of d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) to mV2R was characterized by a bi-phasic binding curve with Ki1 of 0.71 nM and Ki2 of 1855 nM.
Human serum stability assay (ii)
A human serum stability study was carried out on [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6), revealing that it was more stable than OT with a half-life of 25 h in human serum compared to 12 h of OT (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Comparison of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) with endogenous OT (1).
A Functional selectivity profile of [Se-Se]-OT-OH and OT over all four human (h) and murine (m) OT/AVP receptors (IP1 for OTR, V1aR, V1bR; cAMP for V2R) illustrating that [Se-Se]-OT-OH is more selective for the OTR than OT and also retains its selectivity profile across species. B Metabolic stability of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (t1/2=25 h) compared to OT (t1/2=12 h) in human serum. Data (A, B) is presented as means ± SEM of results obtained from at least three separate experiments, each performed in triplicate. C & D Representative tissue bath study showing the dose-dependent effect of OT (C) compared with [Se-Se]-OT-OH (D) on contractions of human myometrium. [Se-Se]-OT-OH increases contraction amplitude in a similar manner to OT, yet maintains a more phasic and frequent contractile activity pattern compared to a more tonic-like activity under OT. N=5 for [Se-Se]-OT-OH, N=8 for OT.
Behavioral efficacy in a mouse model of social fear (iii)
[Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) was tested in the well-established social fear conditioning (SFC) paradigm (65), characterized by reduced social exploration of conspecifics 24 h after SFC. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) reduced social fear, as reflected by a facilitated extinction curve, 10 min after its intracerebroventricular (icv; 250 μM/2 μl/mouse) infusion compared with vehicle-treated social fear conditioned (SFC+) mice. This effect was similar to that of synthetic OT, which also potently reversed social fear, when infused icv (250 μM/2 μl/mouse). All control mice, i.e. unconditioned (SFC-) mice treated with either vehicle, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) or synthetic OT showed a similar level of social preference behavior as reflected by a high level of exploration of conspecifics. All SFC+ and SFC-groups, independent of subsequent treatment, also showed similar investigation of a non-social stimulus (small empty cage) indicating similar non-social anxiety (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Social fear conditioning (SFC) is a paradigm based on operant fear conditioning principles and generates robust social fear in mice without any confounding behavioral alterations (77). SFC-induced social fear could be reversed in male mice by icv administration of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) (in contrast to vehicle) thus confirming that this action is mediated via OTR and not via AVPRs. Percentage investigation of 3 non-social (empty cage) and 6 social (cage with a conspecific) stimuli during social fear extinction (day 2; A) and social fear extinction recall (day 3; B) was measured. Unconditioned (SFC-) and conditioned (SFC+) mice were icv infused with vehicle, OT (1) (250 μM/2 μl; 500 pmol) or [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) (250 μM/2 μl, 500 pmol) 10 min prior to extinction training. Data represents mean ± SEM. *** p<0.001 vs. SFC+/[Se-Se]-OT-OH (A and B).
Human myometrial contractility assays reflecting induction and augmentation of labor (iii)
To determine if the partial agonism observed with [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) and d[Se-Se]-OT-OH OT (7) in the pharmacological studies would affect its physiological activity compared to the full agonist OT (1), we tested 1, 6 and 7's ability to induce contraction via activation of hOTR in myometrial human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT-HM) cells (66) in a collagen gel contractility assay (67, 68). Both [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) and d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7) induced a contractile response comparable to OT (SI Figure S5). 6 and 7 increased contractility by 7.4% (P < 0.01) and 9% (P < 0.001) respectively, compared to 9% (P < 0.001) for OT. This was then confirmed in tissue bath studies using strips of pregnant human myometrium, where [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) increased contraction amplitude in a dose-dependent manner that was comparable to OT (1). EC50 for [Se-Se]-OT-OH and OT were 5.89 ± 3.08 nM (N=5) and 1.14 ± 0.56 nM (N=8) respectively (P > 0.05, P=0.3718, F-test; Figure 3C & D). The contraction profile with [Se-Se]-OT-OH, however, was markedly different to OT, as it maintained a more phasic and frequent contractile activity pattern compared to a more tonic-like activity under OT at the respective concentrations (Figure 3C & D).
Human cardiomyocyte assay to assess cardiovascular safety profile (iv)
We tested the functional effects of OT (1), AVP (11) and [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) on maximal intracellular Ca2+ levels in human cardiomyocytes (Figure 5) to determine if the improved selectivity of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) for hOTR over hV1aR would have reduced cardiovascular liability (which is regulated via hV1aR (69–71)) compared to OT. Both AVP and OT concentration-dependently caused an increase in maximal intracellular Ca2+ in human cardiomyocytes with EC50 values of 121 nM and 174 nM, respectively. OT only had a partial effect (53 ± 11 %) compared to AVP, which correlates well with our pharmacological results of hV1aR activation by OT (SI Table S2 & S3). Consistent with its improved selectivity, [Se-Se]-OT-OH had no effect on the maximal intracellular Ca2+ level in cardiomyocytes up to 10 μM.
Figure 5.
Effects of AVP, OT and [Se-Se]-OT-OH on maximal intracellular Ca2+ in human cardiomyocytes assessed by the FLIPR. AVP and OT concentration-dependently increased the maximal intracellular Ca2+ concentrations while [Se-Se]-OT-OH had no effect. Data is presented as mean ± SEM, N=4 wells per data point.
Discussion
More than 60 years have passed since the discovery, synthesis and characterization of OT and AVP, yet there still remains a shortage of agonists and antagonists with good selectivity for the four known receptor subtypes (Table 2) (37, 38, 72). Physiological function and dysfunction of the individual receptor subtypes are therefore still studied by time- and cost-intensive knockout models, which have linked the subtypes to a range of high-profile disorders including autism, schizophrenia, epilepsy, stress, aggression, depression, anxiety and pain (5, 8, 16, 33). Therapeutic development targeting these disorders has so far failed due to the challenge of developing subtype-selective ligands that maintain their selectivity across species thereby enabling translational studies with clinically relevant animal models (Table 1) (37, 38, 73). While the chiral complexity and large surface area of peptides provide significant advantages in the development of selective ligands (particularly agonists), the traditional medicinal chemistry approach of modifying residues within the loop pharmacophore of OT/AVP struggled to overcome interspecies receptor differences, producing mainly ligands with non-correlating selectivity profiles between species (Table 1). We therefore explored a new medicinal chemistry strategy to address this issue in this current study.
Subtle pharmacophore framework modifications - a new strategy to retain selectivity across murine and human receptors
This SAR study (see Supplementary Note 1 in SI for a more in depth discussion of the SAR study) demonstrated that single atom modifications to the pharmacophore framework (C/N-terminus, disulfide bond) of the endogenous ligands OT/AVP can tune selectivity and yield ligands ([Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) and d[Se-Se]-OT-OH (7)) with an improved selectivity profile that is conserved across species (mouse and human, SI Table S3 and Figure 3A). In particular, the replacement of the disulfide bond with the slightly more hydrophobic and longer diselenide bond (51, 52) in combination with a C-terminal amide to acid change yielded the most pronounced selectivity gains for OTR ([Se-Se]-OT-OH (6), Figure 3A). This selectivity gain renders [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) an excellent probe to delineate OTR function in the CNS in behavioral animal models (where V2R is not expressed) and a promising lead molecule for the clinic, which we further explored herein. Considering all pharmacological and physiological data from this study we recommend an effective dose of 50 nM or, for comparison studies with OT, a 10-fold higher concentration than OT to be used for future functional studies to ensure OTR-mediated action while retaining OTR preference.
General conclusions and guidelines for future OT/AVP design
(i) N-terminal deamination of OT ligands improves binding and potency at all four receptors, renders OT slightly more hydrophobic and improves its stability against proteases (62). N-terminal deamination of AVP shows little impact on potency and selectivity, yet we recommend deamination nevertheless since it offers enhanced stability against proteases. (ii) Recent development in the area of disulfide mimetics recommends the use of the superior seleno-ether bond instead of the disulfide or diselenide bond, mainly due to its enhanced metabolic properties against reduction (4). (iii) The underexplored C-terminus of OT and AVP has already yielded two interesting studies (conopressin agonist to antagonist switch (49) and this study) which form a good base for future antagonist designs: we envision more SAR studies around the C-terminus towards the development of a new class of OT/AVP antagonists that might be able to overcome species differences by harvesting antagonist design using the C-terminus in contrast to current antagonists that obtain antagonistic effects through sterically hindered modifications at the N-terminus. (iv) In terms of pharmacological characterization, the FLIPR is a valuable instrument for the primary screen at the OT/AVP receptors since it rapidly provides agonist/antagonist information with high-throughput capabilities. Follow-up characterization of selected leads by radioligand displacement, HTRF and/or Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) assays can then be used to better understand ligand kinetics and secondary messenger signaling pathways. The SAR study presented here is to our knowledge the first assessing affinity and functional data (FLIPR and IP1) of the control compounds OT/dOT and AVP/dAVP over all four receptor subtypes in a single study, hence forming an important reference for future OT/AVP ligand development.
[Se-Se]-OT-OH modulating central actions (behavior) - reversal of social fear
OT has been linked to multiple high-profile disorders that are modulated centrally such as autism, bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, pain, anxiety and depression (5, 8, 16, 33). Recent studies showing that these central actions can be elicited via intranasal OT administration in humans spiked an enormous interest in this research area with numerous of clinical trials currently on-going that study the therapeutic effects of intranasal OT in these disorders. Considering that OT also activates V1aR and V1bR (SI Table S2-4), especially at high doses such as those used for intranasal application in humans, and that OTR can form homo and hetero dimers (50, 74–76), the exact target pharmacology and underlying mechanism of actions are still unclear and under debate. The receptor-specificity underlying these effects is of substantial interest given the partly opposite behavioral effects of OT and AVP especially in the context of anxiety and stress regulation (14). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) enables clear and simple distinction between the involvement of OTR versus V1aR and V1bR in the CNS without the use of time and cost intensive knock-out models or co-application of species selective V1a/V1bR antagonists. This is crucial for therapeutic target validation and important for future drug development efforts. We chose to behaviorally test our probe in the recently established mouse model of social fear conditioning, which has clinical implication to treat social anxiety disorders (15, 65, 77). SFC is a paradigm based on operant fear conditioning principles and generates robust social fear in mice without any confounding behavioral alterations, and icv infusion of OT has been shown to completely abolish social fear in mice (77). The use of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) in this study confirmed that this action is mediated via OTR with no influence of V1aR nor V1bR (Figure 4).
[Se-Se]-OT-OH modulating peripheral action - labor induction and augmentation
Selectivity against V1aR to reduce cardiovascular side effects is of particular importance in the periphery since it is the primary receptor subtype expressed in the vascular smooth muscle and heart (69–71, 78, 79). Clinically, OT is administered intravenously to induce labor, augment weak contractions in labor and treat postpartum hemorrhage, and intranasally to elicit lactation. Due to its activation of AVPRs, OT administration has only a limited therapeutic window of use and adverse effects reported in the mother include anaphylactic reaction, postpartum hemorrhage, cardiac arrhythmia, fatal afibrinogenemia, pelvic hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypertensive episodes, rupture of the uterus, convulsions, coma and death due to water intoxication. In the neonate, adverse effects reported include bradycardia, cardiac arrhythmia, jaundice, retinal hemorrhage, permanent CNS or brain damage, seizures and death (source RxList and (45, 80)). Hence, there is a clear unmet need for better and more selective OTR agonists that are able to differentiate against the AVPRs to diminish side effects.
[Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) may be such a candidate as experiments showed no activity on human cardiomyocytes (in contrast to OT, which displayed nanomolar activity), where V1aR is highly expressed regulating many of the above-mentioned side effects (Figure 5). Furthermore, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) was able to induce augmentation of contractility in human myometrial preparations comparable to OT, though with a more regular contraction pattern (Figure 3C & D and SI Figure S4). By contrast, OT reduced contraction frequency in a dose dependent fashion but increased the contraction duration resulting in a much greater area under the tension curve (a measure of the total contractile activity/work done) (Figure 3C & D); this can lead to uterine hyperstimulation and rupture, which are a life-threatening events for mother and fetus (81, 82). [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) inactivity at V1aR, which is alongside with OTR also highly expressed in the myometrium during pregnancy and involved in contraction (83, 84), in combination with its partial agonism at OTR results in a more controlled and safer alternative to induce and progress labor in humans. Thus, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) not only reduces AVPR-related side effects but also offers additional advantages to aid labor induction and progression via a more regular increase of contraction strength without the risk of uterine hyperstimulation or rupture. This improved side effect profile is expected to lower associated risks for mother and fetus significantly and expand the therapeutic window of use, thereby lowering the incidence of cesarean sections and its associated costs.
Human serum stability of [Se-Se]-OT-OH
Enzymatic stability is a key characteristic for many peptide drug candidates, hence it was important to characterize the stability of [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) compared to OT (1). Diselenide bonds are known to exhibit a lower redox potential than disulfide bonds, rendering such mimetics more difficult to reduce, a feature that can be exploited in improving the half-life of peptide drug candidates (4, 51, 52, 56, 85). C-terminal amides on the other hand are often used in nature to produce slightly more stable compounds compared to peptides that have C-terminal acids. The human serum stability study showed that [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) displayed an improved half-life of 25 h compared to the half-life of 12 h of OT (Figure 3B), suggesting that the impact of the more redox stable diselenide bond outweighs the disadvantage of the C-terminal acid modification. While this increase in stability might only have limited effects for peripheral applications due to rapid renal clearance (minutes), it could be significant for potential therapeutic CNS applications through intranasal delivery (e.g. treatment of autism in children or migraines in adults) (21).
Conclusion
We were able to show that single atom modifications to the pharmacophoric framework of OT can lead to enhanced selectivity profiles that are conserved across species (mouse and human), thereby overcoming a significant hurdle in ligand development. This is an important proof-of-concept study towards a better molecular understanding of ligand pharmacology and development, not only for the four OT/AVP receptor subtypes, but also for similar complex peptidergic signaling systems. The lead ligand derived from this study, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6), is a new valuable probe that can effectively delineate the physiological responses of OTR and is particularly suited for use in animal behavior studies looking at the central roles of OTR. Its functional selectivity and close structural similarity to OT are important features that will help to clarify the contributions of the OT/OTR signaling system in health and disease. The improved selectivity, stability and safety profile of [Se-Se]-OT-OH could lead to superior alternatives to OT in the clinic for peripheral indications such as labor induction/progression and postpartum hemorrhage, as well as for central indications such as autism, migraine, schizophrenia, anxiety and stress, where recent clinical trials have shown that intranasal administered OT is safe and therapeutically effective (20, 21, 86–89). Taken together, [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) has great potential to advance our understanding of OTR as a therapeutic target in different animal models and represents a promising lead molecule for a variety of high-profile OTR-related indications.
Materials and Methods
Detailed materials and methods are provided in the Supplementary Information (SI).
Selenocysteine building block synthesis
An optimized protocol with yield-improving modifications was developed based on Chocat et al. (58), Tanaka et al. (59) and Oikawa et al. (60) enabling the synthesis of the Boc-L-Sec(Meb)-OH at a scale of 20 g with an overall yield of 62%. A new two-step strategy was devised for the synthesis of dSec(Meb)-OH with an overall yield of 12% (Figure 1).
Peptide synthesis
Peptides 1-16 were assembled manually via Boc-SPPS using the HBTU-mediated in situ neutralization protocol (51, 61). The analogues were cleaved by HF (90), purified by RP-HPLC, folded over 24 h in 0.1M NH4HCO3 buffer at pH 8.2 (1 mg/10 mL, ~100 μM) and purified by RP-HPLC to >95% purity.
FLIPR assay for the human OT, V1a and V1b receptors
Ca2+ responses were assessed in COS-1 cells transfected with OTR, V1a or V1b using a FLIPRTetraPlus fluorescent plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) as previously described (4). In brief, cells were loaded with Calcium-4 No Wash dye (Molecular Devices) for 30 min and responses to addition of test compounds were measured using a cooled CCD camera with excitation at 470–495 nM and emission at 515–575 nM. Data was analyzed using ScreenWorks 3.2 (Molecular Devices) and plotted using GraphPad Prism 6.
cAMP assay for hV2R
Cloning of hV2R, transfection and propagation of HEK293 cells, and assay to determine formation of 3H-cAMP was performed according to published protocols (47, 91, 92).
HTRF-IP1 assay for the human receptors
COS-1 cells were cultured and transiently transfected with plasmid DNA encoding the human OTR, V1aR or V1bR following the manufacturer’s protocol (Lipofectamine 2000, Invitrogen or FuGENE HD, and Roche Applied Science) (56). Assays measuring IP1 accumulation were performed 48 h post-transfection following the manufacturer’s instructions (IP1-HTRF assay kit, Cisbio International).
Radioligand displacement assay for the human receptors
Receptor affinity assays were performed using FlashBLUE GPCR scintillation beads (PerkinElmer) (56). Reactions containing increasing concentrations of competing OT/AVP analogues (10 pM to 10 μM), FlashBLUE GPCR beads (100 μg for hOTR and hV1aR/200 μg for hV1bR and hV2R), human OT/V1a/V1b/V2 receptor membrane preparation (5 μg protein) and radioligand (3H-OT (2 nM)/3H-AVP (0.5 nM)/3H-AVP (3 nM)) in assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2 (5 mM MgCl2 for OT), 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4) were established in 96-well white polystyrene plates with clear flat bottoms in a total reaction volume of 80 μL.
Radioligand displacement assay for the murine receptors
Competitive binding assays were performed using 3H-OT and 3H-AVP (Perkin Elmer) and increasing concentration of the indicated peptides at 30°C on membranes prepared from HEK293 cells transfected with OTR, V1aR, V1bR and V2R murine receptors as in Busnelli et al. (63).
HTRF-IP1 assay and cAMP determination for the murine receptors
IP1 and cAMP accumulation were determined in HEK293 cells transiently transfected with DNA plasmids encoding the murine OT/V1a/V1b or V2 murine receptors using HTRF assays (IP1 and cAMP assays, CisBio International, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France) as previously described (63).
Stability assays
Peptides were added to human serum and aliquots were taken and analyzed by RP-HPLC and LCMS at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24 and 48 h time points (56).
Social fear conditioning (SFC) mouse model
SFC was performed as previously described on adult mice (65). Briefly, on day 1 (social fear acquisition), the SFC-mice were allowed to investigate a social stimulus (male conspecific in a small cage) in the conditioning chamber for 3 min without receiving any foot shocks, whereas SFC+ mice were given a 1-s electric foot shock (0.7 mA) each time they investigated (sniffed) the social stimulus. On day 2 (social fear extinction), SFC+ and SFC-mice were first exposed to 3 non-social stimuli (empty small cages) to assess non-social investigation as a parameter of non-social fear and anxiety-related behavior. Mice were then exposed to 6 different conspecific males (social stimulus) in 3 min intervals, each in a different small cage to assess social investigation as a parameter of social fear. Mice received icv infusions of either vehicle (2 μl; sterile Ringer solution), OT (250 μM/2 μl; 500 pmol) or [Se-Se]-OT-OH (250 μM/2 μl; 500 pmol) 10 min prior to social fear extinction on day 2 as previously described (65, 77). All infusions were performed 10 min prior to social fear extinction on day 2 of the SFC paradigm. The dose and timing of OT was selected based on previous studies (77).
Human myometrial cell contractility assay
Human uterine myometrial smooth muscle cells (hTERT-HM) were cultured, collagen-gels were prepared, and the assays were performed as described previously (47, 68).
Tissue bath myometrial contractility assays
Strips of myometrium were dissected from biopsies obtained from the lower uterine incision site during Cesarean section (93). All women gave written informed consent to participate. The study was approved by the North West (Liverpool East) Research Ethics committee (Ref: 10/H1002/49) and by the Research and Development director at Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. [Se-Se]-OT-OH (6) or OT (1) was added to the organ baths and amplitude of contraction was measured and compared to control activity occurring immediately prior to application of the first concentration (100%). Data were analyzed using Origin Pro 9.0 and Graphpad Prism 5 (N ≥ 5) as described previously (47, 94, 95).
Human cardiomyocyte assay
Changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels were assessed in cardiomyocytes differentiated from WT WTC11 human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) using a FLIPRTetra fluorescent plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). In brief, cells were loaded with Calcium-4 No Wash dye (Molecular Devices) according to the manufacturer's instructions and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Responses to addition of test compounds were measured using a cooled CCD camera with excitation at 470–495 nM and emission at 515–575 nM. Data was analyzed using ScreenWorks 3.2 (Molecular Devices) and plotted using GraphPad Prism 6.
Supplementary Material
One Sentence Summary.
Novel medicinal chemistry strategy yields potent oxytocin receptor agonist that can clearly differentiate between the oxytocin receptor and the closely-related vasopressin receptors in mice and humans.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Alun Jones for the help with MS, Andrew Mulligan for their contribution to some of the synthetic work, Dr. Lachlan Rash for conducting the qualitative control and concentration determination of tested analogues, and Prof. Michael Freissmuth and Dr. Bice Chini for their continuous support.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
M.M. designed and performed the synthesis of the peptide analogues and developed the selenocysteine chemistry. A.A., I.V., M.B., L.R. C.B., R.J.L., C.W.G. performed the pharmacological analysis of the analogues. J.R.D., H.S.C. and N.J.P. performed the cardiomyocyte experiments. S.A., S.W., M.O. and T.J.S. performed the uterine contraction studies. R.M. and I.N. performed the behavioral in vivo experiments. M.M. and P.F.A. directed the project and wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the discussion, preparation of figures and interpretation of the results.
References
- 1.Gainer H. Cell-specific gene expression in oxytocin and vasopressin magnocellular neurons. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;449:15–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4871-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Landgraf R, Neumann ID. Vasopressin and oxytocin release within the brain: a dynamic concept of multiple and variable modes of neuropeptide communication. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2004;25:150–176. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nishimori K, Young LJ, Guo Q, Wang Z, Insel TR, Matzuk MM. Oxytocin is required for nursing but is not essential for parturition or reproductive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:11699–11704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Araujo AD, Mobli M, Castro J, Harrington AM, Vetter I, Dekan Z, Muttenthaler M, Wan J, Lewis RJ, King GF, Brierley SM, et al. Selenoether oxytocin analogues have analgesic properties in a mouse model of chronic abdominal pain. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3165. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:629–683. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Veenema AH, Neumann ID. Central vasopressin and oxytocin release: regulation of complex social behaviours. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:261–276. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00422-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Neumann ID. Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:858–865. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donaldson ZR, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science. 2008;322:900–904. doi: 10.1126/science.1158668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Neumann ID. The advantage of social living: Brain neuropeptides mediate the beneficial consequences of sex and motherhood. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pedersen CA, Prange AJ., Jr Induction of maternal behavior in virgin rats after intracerebroventricular administration of oxytocin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:6661–6665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carter CS, Grippo AJ, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Ruscio MG, Porges SW. Oxytocin, vasopressin and sociality. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:331–336. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00427-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lukas M, Toth I, Reber SO, Slattery DA, Veenema AH, Neumann ID. The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Facilitates Pro-Social Behavior and Prevents Social Avoidance in Rats and Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:2159–2168. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Viviani D, Charlet A, van den Burg E, Robinet C, Hurni N, Abatis M, Magara F, Stoop R. Oxytocin Selectively Gates Fear Responses Through Distinct Outputs from the Central Amygdala. Science. 2011;333:104–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1201043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neumann ID, Landgraf R. Balance of brain oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for anxiety, depression, and social behaviors. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:649–659. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Neumann ID, Slattery DA. Oxytocin in General Anxiety and Social Fear: A Translational Approach. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer-Lindenberg A, Domes G, Kirsch P, Heinrichs M. Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:524–538. doi: 10.1038/nrn3044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zak PJ, Stanton AA, Ahmadi S. Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature. 2005;435:673–676. doi: 10.1038/nature03701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Veening JG, Olivier B. Intranasal administration of oxytocin: Behavioral and clinical effects, a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1445–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feifel D, Macdonald K, Nguyen A, Cobb P, Warlan H, Galangue B, Minassian A, Becker O, Cooper J, Perry W, Lefebvre M, et al. Adjunctive Intranasal Oxytocin Reduces Symptoms in Schizophrenia Patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:678–680. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yatawara CJ, Einfeld SL, Hickie IB, Davenport TA, Guastella AJ. The effect of oxytocin nasal spray on social interaction deficits observed in young children with autism: a randomized clinical crossover trial. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;21:1225–1231. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holmes Cheryl L, Landry Donald W, Granton John T. Science review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 1 - receptor physiology. Crit Care. 2003;7:427–434. doi: 10.1186/cc2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holmes Cheryl L, Landry Donald W, Granton John T. Science Review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 2 - clinical physiology. Crit Care. 2004;8:15–23. doi: 10.1186/cc2338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hatton GI. Emerging concepts of structure-function dynamics in adult brain: the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. Progress in Neurobiology. 1990;34:437–504. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(90)90017-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dantzer R, Koob GF, Bluthe RM, Le Moal M. Septal vasopressin modulates social memory in male rats. Brain Res. 1988;457:143–147. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90066-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bielsky IF, Hu S-B, Szegda KL, Westphal H, Young LJ. Profound Impairment in Social Recognition and Reduction in Anxiety-Like Behavior in Vasopressin V1a Receptor Knockout Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:483–493. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Engelmann M. Vasopressin in the septum: not important versus causally involved in learning and memory - two faces of the same coin? Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:389–395. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00432-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wersinger SR, Ginns EI, O'Carroll AM, Lolait SJ, Young WS., III Vasopressin V1b receptor knockout reduces aggressive behavior in male mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7:975–984. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ferris CF, Melloni RH, Jr, Koppel G, Perry KW, Fuller RW, Delville Y. Vasopressin/serotonin interactions in the anterior hypothalamus control aggressive behavior in golden hamsters. J Neurosci. 1997;17:4331–4340. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04331.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Landgraf R. The involvement of the vasopressin system in stress-related disorders. CNS Neurol Disord: Drug Targets. 2006;5:167–179. doi: 10.2174/187152706776359664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gruber CW, Muttenthaler M. Discovery of defense- and neuropeptides in social ants by genome-mining. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barberis C, Mouillac B, Durroux T. Structural bases of vasopressin/oxytocin receptor function. J Endocrinol. 1998;156:223–229. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1560223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gruber CW, Muttenthaler M, Freissmuth M. Ligand-based peptide design and combinatorial peptide libraries to target G protein-coupled receptors. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:3071–3088. doi: 10.2174/138161210793292474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chini B, Mouillac B, Balestre M-N, Trumpp-Kallmeyer S, Hoflack J, Hibert M, Andriolo M, Pupier S, Jard S, Barberis C. Two aromatic residues regulate the response of the human oxytocin receptor to the partial agonist arginine vasopressin. FEBS Lett. 1996;397:201–206. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01135-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kimura T, Makino Y, Saji F, Takemura M, Inoue T, Kikuchi T, Kubota Y, Azuma C, Nobunaga T, Tokugawa Y, Tanizawa O. Molecular characterization of a cloned human oxytocin receptor. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994;131:385–390. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1310385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mitchell BF, Fang X, Wong S. Oxytocin: a paracrine hormone in the regulation of parturition? Rev Reprod. 1998;3:113–122. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0030113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Manning M, Stoev S, Chini B, Durroux T, Mouillac B, Guillon G. Peptide and non-peptide agonists and antagonists for the vasopressin and oxytocin V1a, V1b, V2 and OT receptors: research tools and potential therapeutic agents. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:473–512. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00437-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chini B, Manning M, Guillon G. Affinity and efficacy of selective agonists and antagonists for vasopressin and oxytocin receptors: an "easy guide" to receptor pharmacology. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:513–517. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00438-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saito M, Tahara A, Sugimoto T. 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) as an agonist on V1b vasopressin receptor. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997;53:1711–1717. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barberis C, Morin D, Durroux T, Mouillac B, Guillon G, Seyer R, Hibert M, Tribollet E, Manning M. Molecular pharmacology of AVP and OT receptors and therapeutic potential. Drug News Perspect. 1999;12:279–292. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guillon G, Derick S, Pena A, Cheng LL, Stoev S, Seyer R, Morgat JL, Barberis C, Serradeil-Le Gal C, Wagnon J, Manning M. The discovery of novel vasopressin V1b receptor ligands for pharmacological, functional and structural investigations. J Neuroendocrinol. 2004;16:356–361. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-8194.2004.01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sweeney G, Holbrook AM, Levine M, Yip M, Alfredsson K, Cappi S, Ohlin M, Schulz P, Wassenaar W. Pharmacokinetics of carbetocin, a long-acting oxytocin analog, in nonpregnant women. Curr Ther Res. 1990;47:528–540. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reversi A, Rimoldi V, Marrocco T, Cassoni P, Bussolati G, Parenti M, Chini B. The Oxytocin Receptor Antagonist Atosiban Inhibits Cell Growth via a "Biased Agonist" Mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:16311–16318. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409945200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Manning M, Stoev S, Cheng LL, Wo NC, Chan WY. Design of oxytocin antagonists, which are more selective than atosiban. J Pept Sci. 2001;7:449–465. doi: 10.1002/psc.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wing DA, Sheibani L. Pharmacotherapy options for labor induction. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16:1657–1668. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1060960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Koehbach J, Stockner T, Bergmayr C, Muttenthaler M, Gruber CW. Insights into the molecular evolution of oxytocin receptor ligand binding. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:197–204. doi: 10.1042/BST20120256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Koehbach J, O'Brien M, Muttenthaler M, Miazzo M, Akcan M, Elliott AG, Daly NL, Harvey PJ, Arrowsmith S, Gunasekera S, Smith TJ, et al. Oxytocic plant cyclotides as templates for peptide G protein-coupled receptor ligand design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:21183–21188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311183110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gruber CW, Koehbach J, Muttenthaler M. Exploring bioactive peptides from natural sources for oxytocin and vasopressin drug discovery. Future Med Chem. 2012;4:1791–1798. doi: 10.4155/fmc.12.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dutertre S, Croker D, Daly NL, Andersson A, Muttenthaler M, Lumsden NG, Craik DJ, Alewood PF, Guillon G, Lewis RJ. Conopressin-T from Conus Tulipa Reveals an Antagonist Switch in Vasopressin-like Peptides. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7100–7108. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706477200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Busnelli M, Kleinau G, Muttenthaler M, Stoev S, Manning M, Bibic L, Howell LA, McCormick PJ, Di Lascio S, Braida D, Sala M, et al. Design and Characterization of Superpotent Bivalent Ligands Targeting Oxytocin Receptor Dimers via a Channel-Like Structure. J Med Chem. 2016;59:7152–7166. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Muttenthaler M, Nevin ST, Grishin AA, Ngo ST, Choy PT, Daly NL, Hu S-H, Armishaw CJ, Wang C-IA, Lewis RJ, Martin JL, et al. Solving the α-conotoxin folding problem: efficient selenium-directed on-resin generation of more potent and stable nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:3514–3522. doi: 10.1021/ja910602h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Muttenthaler M, Alewood PF. Selenopeptide chemistry. J Pept Sci. 2008;14:1223–1239. doi: 10.1002/psc.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rose JP, Wu C-K, Hsiao C-D, Breslow E, Wang B-C. Crystal structure of the neurophysin-oxytocin complex. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:163–169. doi: 10.1038/nsb0296-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hruby VJ. Implications of the x-ray structure of deamino-oxytocin to agonist/antagonist-receptor interactions. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1987;8:336–339. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wood SP, Tickle IJ, Treharne AM, Pitts JE, Mascarenhas Y, Li JY, Husain J, Cooper S, Blundell TL, Hruby VJ, Buku A, et al. Crystal structure analysis of deamino-oxytocin: conformational flexibility and receptor binding. Science. 1986;232:633–636. doi: 10.1126/science.3008332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muttenthaler M, Andersson A, de Araujo AD, Dekan Z, Lewis RJ, Alewood PF. Modulating oxytocin activity and plasma stability by disulfide bond engineering. J Med Chem. 2010;53:8585–8596. doi: 10.1021/jm100989w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jost K, Lebl M, Brtnik F. In: CRC Handbook of Neurohypophyseal Hormone Analogs. Volume I & II. Jost K, Lebl M, Brtnik F, editors. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chocat P, Esaki N, Tanaka H, Soda K. Synthesis of L-selenodjenkolate and its degradation with methionine γ-lyase. Anal Bioanal Chem. 1985;148:485–489. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tanaka H, Soda K. Selenocysteine. Methods Enzymol. 1987;143:240–243. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)43045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Oikawa T, Esaki N, Tanaka H, Soda K. Metalloselenonein, the selenium analogue of metallothionein: synthesis and characterization of its complex with copper ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:3057–3059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schnölzer M, Alewood P, Jones A, Alewood D, Kent SBH. In situ neutralization in Boc-chemistry solid phase peptide synthesis. Rapid, high yield assembly of difficult sequences. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1992;40:180–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1992.tb00291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Du Vigneaud V, Winestock G, Murti VV, Hope DB, Kimbrough RD., Jr Synthesis of 1-beta-mercantopropionic acid oxytocin (desamino-oxytocin), a highly potent analogue of oxytocin. J Biol Chem. 1960;235:PC64–PC66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Busnelli M, Bulgheroni E, Manning M, Kleinau G, Chini B. Selective and potent agonists and antagonists for investigating the role of mouse oxytocin receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;346:318–327. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.202994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Del Tredici AL, Vanover KE, Knapp AE, Bertozzi SM, Nash NR, Burstein ES, Lameh J, Currier EA, Davis RE, Brann MR, Mohell N, et al. Identification of novel selective V2 receptor non-peptide agonists. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;76:1134–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Toth I, Neumann ID, Slattery DA. Social Fear Conditioning: A Novel and Specific Animal Model to Study Social Anxiety Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:1433–1443. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Condon J, Yin S, Mayhew B, Word RA, Wright WE, Shay JW, Rainey WE. Telomerase immortalization of human myometrial cells. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:506–514. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod67.2.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fitzgibbon J, Morrison JJ, Smith TJ, O'Brien M. Modulation of human uterine smooth muscle cell collagen contractility by thrombin, Y-27632, TNF-α and indomethacin. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7 doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Attah Alfred F, O'Brien M, Koehbach J, Sonibare Mubo A, Moody Jones O, Smith Terry J, Gruber Christian W. Uterine contractility of plants used to facilitate childbirth in Nigerian ethnomedicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;143:377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hicks C, Ramos L, Reekie T, Misagh GH, Narlawar R, Kassiou M, McGregor IS. Body temperature and cardiac changes induced by peripherally administered oxytocin, vasopressin and the non-peptide oxytocin receptor agonist WAY 267,464: a biotelemetry study in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:2868–2887. doi: 10.1111/bph.12613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Goldsmith SR, Gheorghiade M. Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1785–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Enkhbaatar P, Traber DL. Physiology of the vasopressin receptors. Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2008;22:253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chini B, Manning M. Agonist selectivity in the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family: new insights and challenges. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:737–741. doi: 10.1042/BST0350737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Manning M, Misicka A, Olma A, Bankowski K, Stoev S, Chini B, Durroux T, Mouillac B, Corbani M, Guillon G. Oxytocin and vasopressin agonists and antagonists as research tools and potential therapeutics. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:609–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02303.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cottet M, Albizu L, Perkovska S, Jean-Alphonse F, Rahmeh R, Orcel H, Mejean C, Granier S, Mendre C, Mouillac B, Durroux T. Past, present and future of vasopressin and oxytocin receptor oligomers, prototypical GPCR models to study dimerization processes. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Devost D, Zingg HH. Homo- and hetero-dimeric complex formations of the human oxytocin receptor. J Neuroendocrinol. 2004;16:372–377. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-8194.2004.01188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Terrillon S, Durroux T, Mouillac B, Breit A, Ayoub MA, Taulan M, Jockers R, Barberis C, Bouvier M. Oxytocin and vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors form constitutive homo- and heterodimers during biosynthesis. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17:677–691. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zoicas I, Slattery DA, Neumann ID. Brain Oxytocin in Social Fear Conditioning and Its Extinction: Involvement of the Lateral Septum. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:3027–3035. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Schweiger TA, Zdanowicz MM. Vasopressin-receptor antagonists in heart failure. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008;65:807–817. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li X, Chan TO, Myers V, Chowdhury I, Zhang X-Q, Song J, Zhang J, Andrel J, Funakoshi H, Robbins J, Koch WJ, et al. Controlled and Cardiac-Restricted Overexpression of the Arginine Vasopressin V1A Receptor Causes Reversible Left Ventricular Dysfunction Through Gαq-Mediated Cell Signaling. Circulation. 2011;124:572–581. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.021352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dyer Robert A, Butwick Alexander J, Carvalho B. Oxytocin for labour and caesarean delivery: implications for the anaesthesiologist. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:255–261. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328345331c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lipshitz J, Klose CW. Use of tocolytic drugs to reverse oxytocin-induced uterine hypertonus and fetal distress. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:16S–18S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, Evanoff B, Macones GA. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:e32/31–e32/35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Maggi M, Del Carlo P, Fantoni G, Giannini S, Torrisi C, Casparis D, Massi G, Serio M. Human myometrium during pregnancy contains and responds to V1 vasopressin receptors as well as oxytocin receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:1142–1154. doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-4-1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bossmar T, Aakerlund M, Fantoni G, Szamatowicz J, Melin P, Maggi M. Receptors for and myometrial responses to oxytocin and vasopressin in preterm and term human pregnancy: effects of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1634–1642. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90415-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Muttenthaler M, Alewood PF. In: Oxidative Folding of Peptides and Proteins. Johannes B, Moroder L, editors. The Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge: 2008. pp. 396–418. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Macdonald E, Dadds MR, Brennan JL, Williams K, Levy F, Cauchi AJ. A review of safety, side-effects and subjective reactions to intranasal oxytocin in human research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36:1114–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Guastella AJ, Einfeld SL, Gray KM, Rinehart NJ, Tonge BJ, Lambert TJ, Hickie IB. Intranasal Oxytocin Improves Emotion Recognition for Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:692–694. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Pedersen Cort A, Gibson Clare M, Rau Shane W, Salimi K, Smedley Kelly L, Casey Robin L, Leserman J, Jarskog LF, Penn David L. Intranasal oxytocin reduces psychotic symptoms and improves Theory of Mind and social perception in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011;132:50–53. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Cacciotti-Saija C, Hickie Ian B, Scott Elizabeth M, Naismith Sharon L, Moore L, Alvares Gail A, Guastella Adam J, Langdon R, Ward Philip B, Redoblado Hodge Marie A. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oxytocin nasal spray and social cognition training for young people with early psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41:483–493. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Muttenthaler M, Albericio F, Dawson PE. Methods, setup and safe handling for anhydrous hydrogen fluoride cleavage in Boc solid-phase peptide synthesis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:1067–1083. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hicks C, Jorgensen W, Brown C, Fardell J, Koehbach J, Gruber CW, Kassiou M, Hunt GE, McGregor IS. The nonpeptide oxytocin receptor agonist WAY 267,464: receptor-binding profile, prosocial effects and distribution of c-Fos expression in adolescent rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:1012–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02311.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bergmayr C, Thurner P, Keuerleber S, Kudlacek O, Nanoff C, Freissmuth M, Gruber CW. Recruitment of a Cytoplasmic Chaperone Relay by the A2A Adenosine Receptor. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:28831–28844. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.464776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Luckas MJ, Wray S. A comparison of the contractile properties of human myometrium obtained from the upper and lower uterine segments. Bjog. 2000;107:1309–1311. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Arrowsmith S, Quenby S, Weeks A, Burdyga T, Wray S. Poor spontaneous and oxytocin-stimulated contractility in human myometrium from postdates pregnancies. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Luckas MJM, Taggart MJ, Wray S. Intracellular calcium stores and agonist-induced contractions in isolated human myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:468–476. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70580-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wisniewski K, Alagarsamy S, Galyean R, Tariga H, Thompson D, Ly B, Wisniewska H, Qi S, Croston G, Laporte R, Riviere PJM, et al. New, potent, and selective peptidic oxytocin receptor agonists. J Med Chem. 2014;57:5306–5317. doi: 10.1021/jm500365s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Pena A, Murat B, Trueba M, Ventura MA, Wo NC, Szeto HH, Cheng LL, Stoev S, Guillon G, Manning M. Design and synthesis of the first selective agonists for the rat vasopressin V1b receptor: based on modifications of deamino-[Cys1]arginine vasopressin at positions 4 and 8. J Med Chem. 2007;50:835–847. doi: 10.1021/jm060928n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Manning M, Cheng LL, Stoev S, Wo NC, Chan WY, Szeto HH, Durroux T, Mouillac B, Barberis C. Design of peptide oxytocin antagonists with strikingly higher affinities and selectivities for the human oxytocin receptor than atosiban. J Pept Sci. 2005;11:593–608. doi: 10.1002/psc.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Andres M, Trueba M, Guillon G. Pharmacological characterization of F-180: a selective human V1a vasopressin receptor agonist of high affinity. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135:1828–1836. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Laporte R, Kohan A, Heitzmann J, Wisniewska H, Toy J, La E, Tariga H, Alagarsamy S, Ly B, Dykert J, Qi S, et al. Pharmacological characterization of FE 202158, a novel, potent, selective, and short-acting peptidic vasopressin V1a receptor full agonist for the treatment of vasodilatory hypotension. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;337:786–796. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.178848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wisniewski K, Galyean R, Tariga H, Alagarsamy S, Croston G, Heitzmann J, Kohan A, Wisniewska H, Laporte R, Riviere PJM, Schteingart CD. New, potent, selective, and short-acting peptidic V1a receptor agonists. J Med Chem. 2011;54:4388–4398. doi: 10.1021/jm200278m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gal CS-L, Raufaste D, Derick S, Blankenstein J, Allen J, Pouzet B, Pascal M, Wagnon J, Ventura MA. Biological characterization of rodent and human vasopressin V1b receptors using SSR-149415, a nonpeptide V1b receptor ligand. Am J Physiol. 2007;293:R938–R949. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00062.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Gal CS-L, Wagnon J, Simiand J, Griebel G, Lacour C, Guillon G, Barberis C, Brossard G, Soubrie P, Nisato D, Pascal M, et al. Characterization of (2S,4R)-1-[5-Chloro-1-[(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)sulfonyl]-3-(2-methoxy-phenyl)-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-3-yl]-4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidinecarboxamide (SSR149415), a selective and orally active vasopressin V1b receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300:1122–1130. doi: 10.1124/jpet.300.3.1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





