Figure 9.

GDT_TS (black lines) and ASE (red lines) scores of four selected groups as a function of target difficulty. All four groups attain high average GDT_TS scores, but only two of them (Zhang and McGuffin) score well on ASE scores, while the remaining two score poorly. For all four groups, GDT_TS trend lines run higher for CASP12 (solid line) than for CASP11 (dashed line), indicating accuracy improvement.