Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2017 Dec 4;86(Suppl 1):321–334. doi: 10.1002/prot.25425

Figure 9.

Figure 9

GDT_TS (black lines) and ASE (red lines) scores of four selected groups as a function of target difficulty. All four groups attain high average GDT_TS scores, but only two of them (Zhang and McGuffin) score well on ASE scores, while the remaining two score poorly. For all four groups, GDT_TS trend lines run higher for CASP12 (solid line) than for CASP11 (dashed line), indicating accuracy improvement.