Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1033:59–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66653-2_5

Immunology of Gut Bone Signaling

Fraser L Collins 1, Jonathan Schepper 1, Naiomy Deliz Rios-Arce 1,2, Michael Steury 1, Ho Jun Kang 1, Heather Mallin 1, Daniel Schoenherr 1, Glen Camfield 1, Saima Chishti 1, Laura R McCabe 1,3,4,5, Narayanan Parameswaran 1,5
PMCID: PMC5749247  NIHMSID: NIHMS927822  PMID: 29101652

Abstract

In recent years a link between the gastro-intestinal tract and bone health has started to gain significant attention. Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota has been linked to the pathology of a number of diseases which are associated with bone loss. In addition modulation of the intestinal microbiota with probiotic bacteria has revealed to have both beneficial local and systemic effects. In the present chapter we discuss the intestinal and bone immune systems, explore how intestinal disease affects the immune system and examine how these pathologic changes could adversely impact bone health.

The Digestive Tract

The gastrointestinal tract forms a continuous tube from the mouth to the anus with the intestine consisting of two major segments: the small and large intestines. Each intestinal segment consists of specialized regions that mediate nutrient digestion and absorption (small intestine), control water and electrolyte absorption (small and large intestine), absorb vitamin B12 and bile absorption (ileum), regulate the movement of digested products/chyme through the tract, as well as interact with and influence the intestinal microbiome (Fig 1). Partly due to this constant interaction with intestinal flora, the digestive tract has one of the largest immune compartments in the body (1). By providing the body with the ability to sense the environment (dietary composition, pathogens, etc…) and to absorb water and nutrients needed to maintain homeostasis, the gut is a crucial organ for survival.

Fig 1. Regions of the Intestine.

Fig 1

The intestine is composed of two main segments: the small intestine and the large intestine. The small intestine is further divided into the duodenum, jejunum and ileum while the large intestine consists of the cecum, colon and anus. These regions are specialized with regard to the digestion and absorption of nutrients required to maintain homeostasis.

Descending from the stomach, the human small intestine is approximately 5 meters in length and has three sections (based on histology and function): the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. The small intestine is characterized by plicae circulares (folds in the duodenum), villi which are finger like projections that extend out into the lumen throughout the small intestine, and microvilli at the apical surface of epithelial cells; together these structures vastly increase the surface area for nutrient absorption; while once thought to be greater than the area of a tennis court, more recent studies indicate the surface area is more on the order of half a badminton court (32 meters) (2). The large intestine consists of the cecum; ascending, transverse and descending colon; rectum and ends in the anus. While shorter than the small intestine, approximately 1.5 m, the large intestine is wider in diameter (4.8 cm vs 2.5 cm diameter in the small intestine). In contrast to the small intestine, the large intestine does not contain villi (1).

Though different in gross morphology due to their divergent functions, all sections of the intestinal tract are comprised of four layers visualized cross-sectionally: the mucosa, submucosa, muscularis externa and the serosa. The mucosa is vital for the regulation of many immunological processes aiding in the regulation and appropriate tolerance of the microbiota. It is made up of three sub-layers: 1) the epithelial layer which contains strong cell:cell connections (tight junctions) and forms a strong barrier that has low permeability, 2) the underlying lamina propria where connective tissue, blood vessels and immune cells are located, and 3) the muscularis mucosae a thin muscular layer under the lamina propria (Fig 2). The mucosa plays a key role in the intestinal immunological defenses ensuring that luminal pathogens do not cross the intestinal barrier (1). In this chapter we will focus on gut and bone immunology separately and then discuss how the immune system can serve as a link between the two organs.

Fig 2. Layers of the Intestinal Tract.

Fig 2

A cross section of the intestine displaying the different layers. The serosa, the outermost layer, covers the intestine. The muscular layer (muscularis externa) consists of two types of muscle, the inner circular muscle and the outer longitudinal muscle; coordinated contraction of these muscles, known as peristalsis, moves chime / feces through the intestinal tract. The submucosa consists of dense and irregular connective tissue containing blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves that branch into the mucosa. The mucosa is the inner most layer of the intestine and consists of the epithelium (in contact with the lumen), the lamina propria and the muscularis mucosae.

The Intestinal Immune System

The adult human intestine is residence to 1013 to 1014 microorganisms (3,4). Gut microbiota, dietary proteins, and pathogens are recognized by the immune system as non-self, and therefore can elicit an immune response. The gut must both protect the host from invading pathogens while maintaining immune tolerance against beneficial dietary protein and harmless commensal microbes (5–8). Given that immune surveillance is critical, it is not surprising that the intestinal tract contains the largest number of immune cells of any organ in the body, known as the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). In addition, the intestine has specialized epithelial cells (Paneth and goblet cells) that secrete anti-bacterial factors, and has intraepithelial lymphocytes to sample luminal antigens (Fig 3). The intestine also contains organized lymphoid structures comprised of Peyer's patches, solitary isolated lymphoid tissues, lamia propria and draining lymph nodes. In the following section we will discuss each of these barrier and surveillance components and how they influence gut defense.

Fig 3. Simplified Schematic Representation of the Intestinal Layers and Epithelial Barrier of the Small (left) and Large (right) Intestine.

Fig 3

The small intestine consists of projections in to the lumen known as villi. These vastly increase the absorptive surface area. In contrast, the colon is relatively smooth and contains crypts. The epithelial barrier is made up of numerous cell types. Enterocytes, found in the small intestine, are the absorptive cell and have microvilli on their apical surface further increasing the surface area involved in digestion. Interspersed between the enterocytes are goblet cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). Goblet cells produce mucus that forms a protective layer over the epithelial barrier. In the small intestine this mucus layer is loosely adherent while in the large intestine the mucus layer is split into two sections; a loose outer layer and an adherent inner layer. IELs have numerous functions including but not limited to; forming a frontline of defense against pathogens in the lumen, suppressing excessive inflammation and ensuring the integrity of the epithelium. Within the intestinal crypt Paneth cells produce antimicrobial peptides, defensins and lysozymes. These Paneth cells are interspersed between stem cells which renew the intestinal epithelium. Adapted from Mowat et al. (1).

Paneth Cells

Paneth cells are specialized, long-lived cells that migrate to the base of crypts after differentiating from stem cells. They produce anti-microbial peptides including; regenerating islet-derived protein IIIγ (REGIIIγ), defensins and lysozymes, which are secreted into crypt/lumen area to reduce bacterial survival near the epithelial barrier. Paneth cells are only found in the small intestine with the highest concentration observed in the ileum. They play a key role in small intestinal homeostasis. Dysregulation in their function results in an increased risk of developing adverse conditions such as Crohn's disease (9).

Goblet Cells

Goblet cells are responsible for the production and secretion of mucus. The frequency of goblet cells increases along the gastrointestinal tract; comprising ∼ 10% of epithelial cells in the upper small intestine and ∼25% of epithelial cells in the distal colon. The mucus layer produced by goblet cells covers the mucosa/epithelial cells and forms a barrier to luminal toxins and bacteria. In the small intestine the secreted mucus exists as a single layer and is loosely adherent. In contrast, the mucus layer in the colon is divided into two sections: a loose outer layer that contains bacteria and a dense bacteria-free inner layer that is firmly attached to the epithelium (10–12). In addition to being a physical barrier, mucus contains glycol proteins, IgA, antimicrobial peptides and other substances that are toxic to many bacteria (1,13).

Intraepithelial Lymphocytes

The majority of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are antigen-experienced T-lymphocytes belonging to both the T cell receptor-γδ (TCRγδ) and TCRαβ lineages and form a frontline of immune defense against invading pathogens (14). IELs are heterogeneous with alternate distribution patterns in the small and large intestine based upon the physiological conditions. TCRγδ T cells make up approximately 60% of IELs in the small intestine. The majority of IELs can express effector cytokines including, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-17 and interferon gamma (IFNγ) (14,15). Under normal physiological conditions IELs display regulatory functions and suppress excessive inflammation that can damage the delicate single cell layer epithelial barrier. Thus their primary role is to ensure the integrity of the intestinal epithelium and maintain local immune quiescence (16,17). However, in some pathological conditions excessive or uncontrolled IEL cytotoxicity can promote inflammation which may initiate or exacerbate inflammatory bowel diseases or celiac disease (14,18).

Peyer's Patches

Peyer's patches are the best characterized lymphoid structures in the GALT (Fig 4). Peyer's patches are macroscopic structures that are visible on the anti-mesenteric side of the small intestine. The size and number of Peyer's patches increases from the jejunum to the ileum with the highest concentration found in the distal ileum; Peyer's patches are rarely observed in the duodenum (19). Peyer's patches are characterized by an overlying follicle-associated epithelium. The follicle-associated epithelium contains microfold cells (M cells) that are specialized for the uptake and transport of antigens from the lumen into Peyer's patches, where they are taken up by dendritic cells and presented to the lymphocytes for adaptive immune response (20). Peyer's patches are composed of germinal centers with B cell lymphoid follicles that are flanked by smaller T cell areas (21). While the large intestine does not have Peyer's patches per se, equivalent macroscopic M cell-containing structures can be found; around the ileocaecal valve these structures are known as caecal patches while throughout the colon and rectum these structures are known as colonic patches (22).

Fig 4. Simplified Schematic Diagram of the Peyer's Patch.

Fig 4

Peyer's patches are lymphoid structures visible on the anti-mesenteric side of the small intestine and are composed of B cell germinal centers surrounded by T cells. Peyer's patches are characterized by the presence of the follicle-associated epithelium which contains M cells. M cells transport the antigens present in the lumen into the Peyer's patch where they are up taken by DCs. DCs present these antigens to the lymphocytes which initiate the adaptive immune response. Adapted from Mowat et al. (23).

Solitary Isolated Lymphoid Tissues

Solitary isolated lymphoid tissues (SILTs) can only be detected microscopically and range in size from small cryopatches to larger mature isolated lymphoid follicles (24). In contrast to Peyer's patches, the isolated lymphoid follicles consist of B cells with no clear T cell zone but do contain germinal centers (25). SILTs increase in number down the human small intestine; with 10-fold more in the distal ileum compared to the proximal jejunum. In the colon numbers of SILTs triple from the ascending colon to the recto-sigmoid colon (24). The role of SILTs is relatively unknown when compared to the larger lymphoid tissues however; studies have suggested that they may have a similar role to Peyer's patches in the induction of an immune response (26,27)

Lamina Propria

The lamina propria is comprised of loosely packed connective tissue forming the supportive structure for the villi and also contains the blood supply, lymph drainage and nervous system for the mucosa (1). In addition, the lamina propria contains many cells of the innate and adaptive immune system: dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, eosinophils, mast cells, B cells and T cells (Fig 5). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are found in a ratio of approximately 2:1 with the majority displaying an effector memory phenotype (28). The CD4+ population of T cells in the lamina propria is very diverse with T helper (Th) 1, Th2, Th17, forkhead box P3-positive (Foxp3) regulatory T cells (Treg) and Foxp3-negative (TR1) subsets present. Th17 cells decrease in number from the duodenum to the colon whereas Treg numbers are highest in the colon. Numbers of Th1 and Th2 cells have been reported to be consistent along the length of the intestine (29).

Fig 5. Immune Cells of the Lamina Propria.

Fig 5

The lamina propria is comprised of loosely packed connective tissue that forms a supportive structure for the villi and contains the mucosa blood supply, lymph drainage and nervous system. The lamina propria cell population is variable containing cells of the innate immune system: DCs, macrophages, eosinophils and mast cells, and adaptive immune system: T lymphocytes (CD4+ Th1, Th2, Th17, Treg and TR1; CD8+) and B lymphocytes (B cells and IgA and IgM producing plasma cells). Adapted from Mowat et al. (1).

The lamina propria also contains large numbers of B cells and plasma cells, with the highest density at the proximal and distal ends of the intestinal tract (30). IgA plasma cells are the most abundant throughout the intestine; with the frequency increasing from approximately 75% of plasma cells in the duodenum to 90% in the colon. The majority of the remaining plasma cells secrete IgM (1).

The most abundant leukocyte in the healthy lamina propria is the macrophage which is present in the small and large intestine. Intestinal macrophages are involved in maintaining intestinal homeostasis; phagocytosing and degrading microorganisms and dead cells while releasing factors that stimulate renewal of the epithelium. Lamina propria macrophages produce large quantities of IL-10; an anti-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the survival and function of Foxp3+ Treg cells (31,32).

Intestinal DCs are characterized by the expression of the markers CD11c+, MHC II+ and the absence of CD64 and F4/80. Four main subsets of DCs have been described in the mouse lamina propria and are classified on the basis of their expression of CD103 and CD11b (33). These subsets have been suggested to have distinct roles in intestinal immune homeostasis. DCs continuously migrate from the gut to the draining lymph nodes a process required for tolerance induction to ‘self’ or food antigens (34). Following antigen stimulation DCs can activate T cells to induce the appropriate inflammatory response, promote T cell differentiation into effector or regulatory subsets, induce B cell isotype switching as well as mucosal homing properties to T and B cells (34).

Mast cells are present throughout the healthy intestine and account for 2-3% of lamina propria cells under normal conditions (35). They produce factors that mediate epithelial barrier integrity, peristalsis, vascular tone and permeability (1). Furthermore, mast cells express toll-like receptors suggesting that these cells can also detect microorganisms and/or the associated structures (35). Eosinophils are believed to have a role in tissue repair in both physiological and pathological conditions in both the small and large intestines. In addition, studies have suggested that eosinophils may have a role in maintaining IgA+ plasma cell numbers, DCs and Foxp3+ Treg cells in the lamina propria (36).

Draining Lymph Nodes

The intestinal lymph nodes are the largest in the body. In rodents, different segments of the intestine drain to specific nodes; the duodenum primarily drains to a small node located in the pancreatic tissue; the jejunum drains to the middle mesenteric lymph node (MLN); the distal ileum, caecum and ascending colon drain to the distal MLN; the traverse colon drains to two small nodes buried in the pancreas; and the descending colon and rectum drain to the caudal lymph node. Similar region specific differences in lymph drainage are also observed in humans (1). The intestinal lymphatic system plays a key role in acquired immunity and tolerance; recirculating lymphocytes which pass from the blood to tissue then to the lymph nodes before returning to the circulation (37). Studies have revealed that the MLNs are key sites for the induction of tolerance to food and commensal bacteria antigens. Antigen-laden DCs migrate from the intestinal epithelial barrier to the MLNs where they can “educate” MLN resident T cells. In addition, the MLNs act as a ‘firewall’ stopping commensal bacteria-laden DCs from entering the thoracic duct lymph system and reaching the systemic circulation. Bacteria that may be released by DCs upon cell death are eliminated by MLN macrophages (38).

Inflammatory Intestinal Pathologies

Dysregulation of the intestinal immune system is involved in a number of serious pathological conditions including: celiac disease, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While celiac disease is localized to the duodenum, Crohn's disease is most common in the distal small intestine and ulcerative colitis in the colon (39,40). The specific cytokines dysregulated in the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are also different. Crohn's disease is driven by a Th1 / Th17 response in which IL-12, IL-23, IL-17 and IFNγ play key roles while ulcerative colitis is driven by a Th2-like response in which IL-5 and IL-13 play a key role (41,42). Interestingly, these intestinal pathologies are also associated with bone pathology with a significant decrease in trabecular bone leading to the development of osteoporosis (43,44).

Osteoimmunology – The Bone Immune System

Bone remodeling is a coordinated process that maintains the rate of osteoblast (OB) bone formation and osteoclast (OC) bone resorption, ensuring the maintenance of skeletal integrity. Under normal physiological conditions the osteoblast and osteoclast cross-talk, with each cell able to regulate the differentiation and action of the other. The process of canonical osteoclast differentiation is regulated by the action of three critical cytokines released by the osteoblast: macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSF), receptor activator of nuclear-factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) and the soluble RANKL receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG) (45). Conversely, the osteoclast can modulate osteoblast differentiation through the secretion of coupling factors including BMP-6 and Wnt10b (46,47) and membrane-bound components including ephrin/Eph family members (47) (Fig 6). In addition to the crosstalk between bone cells, the immune system has been demonstrated to play a significant role in regulating bone remodeling. This section will discuss the role of the immune system in the regulation of bone cell activity.

Fig 6. Osteoblast and Osteoclast Cross Talk.

Fig 6

Osteoblasts regulate osteoclast differentiation and activity through the expression of three critical cytokines: macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSF receptor activator of nuclear-factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL. Conversely, osteoclasts can modulate osteoblast differentiation through expression of the osteogenic factors Wnt10b and bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-6.

Immune Cells and Bone

T-lymphocyte regulation of bone

As discussed before, T cells are classed into two main categories based on the subunits of the T cell receptor (TCR) they express; αβ or γδ. The majority of T cells express the αβ subunits and can be further divided based on the expression of the CD4 and CD8 markers (48). The CD4+ T cells can additionally be sub-divided based on their cytokine profiles: Th1, Th2, Treg and Th17. While T lymphocytes are critical mediators of the adaptive immune response they are also capable of modulating bone remodeling.

Under physiological conditions T cells are not major contributors to the levels of RANKL because T cell-deficient nude mice do not exhibit diminished RANKL mRNA in their BM (49). However, resting T cells are demonstrated to have a bone protective role, stimulating B-lymphocyte-mediated OPG production through CD40 – CD40L interaction (49). Consistent with this, T cell-deficient nude mouse have baseline OC numbers and reduced bone density compared to controls (49,50). In addition, CD4/CD8 T cell depleted mice exhibit significantly elevated in vitro osteoclastogenesis (51). In contrast, activation of T cells by infection and inflammation leads to an increase in T cell-derived osteoclastogenic factors such as RANKL and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), subsequently resulting in increased bone resorption as seen in conditions such as osteoporosis, the inflammatory arthritides and periodontitis (52). It should be noted nonetheless, that distinct T cell subsets have differing functions when it comes to regulating bone turnover (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Lymphocyte Modulation of Bone Remodeling.

Fig 7

Bone marrow lymphocytes can modulate the differentiation and function of osteoclasts and osteoblasts through the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines as well as RANKL and OPG.

CD4+ T cell subsets and their effects on bone

Following antigen stimulation naïve CD4 T cells proliferate and undergo differentiation into distinct effector subsets that are classified according to their cytokine profiles. T helper 1 (Th1)_cells are characterized by the expression of TNFα, interferon gamma (IFNγ) and interleukin (IL)-2; Th2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10 and IL-13; Th17 cells produce IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21 and IL-22; and Tregs express CD25 and Foxp3 and produce IL-10 and TGFβ (53,54). Of these subsets Th1, Th2 and Treg cells suppress osteoclast formation while Th17 cells stimulate osteoclastogenesis. Inhibition by Th1 and Th2 is in part dependent on the number of T cells as well as on the expression of IFNγ and IL4 (55).

Tregs can modulate osteoclast formation via direct cell-to-cell contact as well as through cytokine production (56). Mechanism of direct cell contact is through cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) expressed on Tregs (56). Furthermore, addition of CTLA-4 to osteoclast precursor cells dose-dependently suppresses osteoclast formation, a process reversed by anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (56). These data suggest that CTLA-4 may directly suppress osteoclastogenesis by binding to CD80/CD86 on mononuclear OC precursors (57). In addition to the direct suppressive effect of Tregs on osteoclast differentiation, expression of TGFβ, IL-4 and IL-10 were observed to contribute to the inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis (56). The role of these cytokines in the mechanism by which Tregs inhibit osteoclast formation is supported in studies by Luo et al (58) and Kim et al (59) who demonstrated that CD4 Tregs suppressed osteoclast formation from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) via the expression of the cytokines TGFβ, IL-4 and IL-10.

Compared to the above T helper subsets, Th17 cells primarily support osteoclast differentiation through the production of IL-17A and are believed to play a crucial role in inflammation and the development of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, Th17 cells express RANKL and TNFα which can directly act on osteoclast precursors to induce osteoclastogenesis (55,60,61)

CD8+ T lymphocyte regulation of bone

Activated CD8+ T cells express high levels of RANKL and OPG. When cultured with osteoclast precursors, CD8+ T cells however, inhibit soluble RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. Interestingly, blocking OPG with an antibody does not reverse the inhibitory effect of the CD8+ T cells suggesting the involvement of other factors (62). The bone protective role of CD8+ T cells has also been reported by John et al (63) who revealed that depletion of CD8+ T cells from murine bone marrow increases osteoclast differentiation.

CD8+ T cells also play a key role in the anabolic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Treatment of mice with intermittent PTH (iPTH) significantly increases the production of Wnt10b by bone marrow CD8+ T cells subsequently activating canonical Wnt signaling in osteoblasts (64). CD8+ T-cell-dependent anabolic effect of PTH was demonstrated in T-cell-null mice which displayed diminished Wnt signaling in pre-osteoblasts and blunted osteoblastic commitment, proliferation, differentiation, and life span (64). In addition, conditional silencing of PTH receptor 1 in T cells blunted the ability of iPTH to induce T cell Wnt10b production, activate osteoblastic Wnt signaling and increased bone turnover (65).

CD8+ T Regulatory cells in bone health

In contrast to CD4+ Tregs, CD8+ Tregs have not been extensively studied partly due to their low abundance in lymphoid tissues (57); though like their CD4 counterparts they express both CD25 and the transcription factor Foxp3 (66). In vitro, the osteoclast-induced Foxp3+ CD8+ Treg cells potently and directly suppressed osteoclast differentiation and resorptive activity, but did not affect mature osteoclast survival. This suppressive effect of Foxp3+ CD8+ Tregs was relieved following antibody blockade against IL-6, IL-10 and IFNγ (67). Using adoptive transfer experiments Foxp3+ CD8+ Tregs were shown to limit the bone loss induced by RANKL administration as well as protect against ovariectomy-induced bone loss (68).

B-lymphocytes and their regulation of bone cells

B cells have a close and multifaceted relationship with bone cells (69). B cells are differentiated from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in niches found on the endosteal bone surface (57,69). These niches are supported by osteoblasts which sustain the HSCs and B cell differentiation (69). The role of B cells in normal bone remodeling is not fully clear however, cells of the B-cell-lineage have been demonstrated to be responsible for 64% of total BM OPG production, with 45% derived from mature B cells (49). In support of a role for B cells in physiological bone remodeling B cell knockout (KO) mice have an osteoporotic phenotype, due to elevated osteoclast bone resorption and decreased BM OPG expression; a phenotype rescued by B cell reconstitution (49). In addition to a role in physiological bone remodeling, activated B cells have been implicated in many inflammatory diseases associated with osteoporosis; such as estrogen deficiency, multiple myeloma and periodontal disease (62,70).

In conditions of estrogen depletion B lymphogenesis is increased. Consistent with this, estrogen treatment downregulates B lymphogenesis (71,72). Furthermore, B cells isolated from the bone marrow of post-menopausal women have also been shown to express RANKL (73) suggesting a role for B cells in menopausal bone loss. This is further supported in a study by Onal et al (74) using B cell specific RANKL KO mice. These KO mice were partially protected from ovariectomy-induced bone loss. This protection occurred in the trabecular bone, but not the cortical bone, and was associated with a failure to increase osteoclast numbers. Conversely however, in an in vitro model of osteoclastogenesis, B cells isolated from the peripheral blood inhibited OC formation via the secretion of TGFβ, a cytokine that induces OC apoptosis (75); suggesting that the role of B cells in estrogen-deficiency induced bone loss may not be clear-cut.

In multiple myeloma B cells and B cell-derived plasma cells have been reported to support osteoclastogenesis directly through expression of RANKL and indirectly through expression of IL-7 (76,77). In addition, malignant B-cell-derived plasma cells have been shown to secrete cytokines such as sclerostin and DKK1 which inhibit osteoblastogenesis (77,78); affecting the balance of remodeling on two fronts. In human chronic periodontitis B-lineage cells (B lymphocytes and plasma cells) have been revealed to dominate the inflammatory infiltrate suggesting that these cells play a key role in the associated bone loss (79). This is supported by murine studies in the ligature-induced periodontitis model and the P. gingivalis oral infection model, where reduced bone loss was observed in B cell-deficient mice (μMT) compared to wild-type controls (80,81). Furthermore, antibody neutralization of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) or B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLys), two cytokines important for the maturation and survival of B cells, diminished the number of B cells in the gingival tissue and inhibited bone loss in wild-type but not in B cell- deficient mice (80).

Regulation of bone by Neutrophils

Neutrophils are implicated with bone loss associated with murine models of inflammatory arthritis (82–84) and human periodontitis (85). Human and murine neutrophils strongly upregulate their expression of RANKL following LPS treatment, stimulating osteoclastic bone resorption through direct cell-cell contact with osteoclasts (86) (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Role of Myeloid Cells in Osteoclast Differentiation.

Fig 8

Under inflammatory conditions neutrophils upregulate expression of RANKL which can stimulate osteoclast differentiation. Furthermore, following stimulation with RANKL and MCSF, immature dendritic cells can transdifferentiate into functional osteoclasts.

Role of Dendritic Cells in bone health

Dendritic cells (DCs) are broadly composed of two main subsets: conventional (cDC) and plasmacytoid (pDC). The main function of cDCs is to process and present antigens to antigen-specific naïve T cells whereas the function of pDCs is the secretion of IFNα / β in response to viral infection (87). While DCs do not appear to play a role in physiological bone remodeling in chronic inflammatory conditions, such as RA, immature cDCs have the potential to serve as osteoclast precursors (88,89). These DC-derived osteoclasts are functionally active and able to resorb bone (90,91) (Fig 8).

Immune Cytokines and Bone

TNFα

TNFα can affect bone remodeling in multiple ways, acting on the osteoclast and the osteoblast (92). TNFα increases osteoclast formation by upregulating osteoblast expression of RANKL and MCSF (93,94). Furthermore, TNFα can act on osteoclast precursors in permissive levels of RANKL inducing their differentiation by enhancing its effects (95–97). Blockade of TNF activity in bone pathological conditions such as inflammatory arthritis and estrogen-deficiency have been shown to protect against the associated bone loss (98,99). In addition to stimulating osteoclast formation and bone resorption TNFα also inhibits osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and matrix deposition (100,101). Moreover, TNFα is pro-apoptotic for osteoblasts, potentially through Fas – FasL signaling (102,103), though the significance of this pathway in osteoblast apoptosis has been disputed in recent studies (104). Interestingly however, low levels of TNF have been revealed to induce osteogenic differentiation via upregulation of the transcription factors Runx2 and Osx (92,105) demonstrating a complex role for TNFα in regulation of bone remodeling.

Other TNF super family members

TNF-like protein 1A (TL1A) has been demonstrated to enhance RANKL induced osteoclastogenesis in murine and human models (106,107), furthermore TL1A has been linked to the adverse bone pathogenesis observed in inflammatory arthritis (106–108). Studies have also suggested that TL1A, signaling through death receptor 3 (DR3), may affect osteoblast differentiation and mineralization (109).

LIGHT (homologous to lymphotoxins exhibiting inducible expression and competing with herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D for herpesvirus entry mediator [HVEM], a receptor expressed by T lymphocytes) is elevated in conditions such as RA and multiple myeloma (110,111). In vitro, LIGHT has been reported to induce osteoclastogenesis in RANKL-dependent and –independent manners and indirectly inhibit osteoblastogenesis (110,111).

TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) is another member of the TNFSF that has biphasic effects on bone (112). TRAIL has been shown to induce apoptosis of osteoclasts but not osteoblasts (113,114). In addition, in vivo, injection of TRAIL for 8 days in 4-wk-old mice induces an increase in bone mass (115).

Interleukin-1

IL-1 plays an important role in pathological bone loss as seen in conditions such as RA and estrogen-deficiency. In murine models of menopause (ovariectomy) mice deficient in IL-1 signaling are protected against bone loss while treatment with IL-1 receptor antagonists reduces osteoclast formation and activity (116,117). In the collagen-induced arthritis model anti-IL-1β and anti-IL-1R treatment reduced arthritis severity and protected against focal bone erosions (118). IL-1 acts on the bone cells in a number of ways (119); IL-1 enhances RANKL expression from osteoblasts / stromal cells (93); indirectly stimulates osteoclast differentiation by stimulating prostaglandin E2 synthesis in osteoblasts (120); induces osteoclast precursor fusion into the multinucleated osteoclast (121); enhances osteoclast resorptive activity (121); and directly effects the survival of osteoclasts (122,123).

Interleukin-6

The role of IL-6 in osteoclast bone resorption is currently debated with studies revealing that it can both stimulate bone resorption, inhibit osteoclast differentiation or has no effect depending on the model used (124–126). However, in menopausal women, levels of IL-6 are elevated while in the murine OVX model IL-6 has been linked to increased osteoclast development (127). The role of IL-6 in estrogen-deficiency induced bone loss is further supported in the IL-6 knockout mouse which is protected against development of osteoporosis (128). A role for IL-6 in bone loss has also been reported in diseases such as Paget's disease and rheumatoid arthritis (129,130).

Interleukin-7

IL-7 is an osteoclastogenic cytokine, produced in the bone marrow primarily by stromal cells and osteoblasts, which is able to stimulate B and T cells (131). IL-7 promotes osteoclastogenesis by upregulating T and B cell-derived RANKL and TNFα (50,132). In the OVX model, increased production of IL-7 has been postulated to be a key factor in the uncoupling of bone formation from bone resorption (131).

Interleukin-10

IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, is mainly expressed by activated T and B cells. IL-10 has potent inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis both direct and indirect. IL-10 directly suppresses osteoclast formation by reducing nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) expression and its translocation to the nucleus (133) and by suppressing c-Fos and c-Jun (134). Indirectly IL-10 has been shown to modulate osteoclast formation by increasing gene expression of OPG and decreasing RANKL gene expression in dental follicle cells (135).

Interleukin-17A

IL-17A acts on osteoclasts via both direct and indirect mechanisms. In an in vitro system IL-17A has been shown to directly act on human osteoclast precursors upregulating expression of RANK and rendering the cells more sensitive to the actions of RANKL (136). In addition, IL-17A elevates stromal cell expression of RANKL and synovial macrophage expression of the osteoclastogenic factors TNFα and IL-1β, indirectly effecting osteoclastogenesis (137). Conversely, IL-17A has been demonstrated to exhibit strong osteogenic effects when exposed directly to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) acting synergistically with bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) (138).

Interferon γ

The effect of IFNγ on osteoclastogenesis is controversial. In vitro, IFNγ has been reported to inhibit osteoclastogenesis (139,140) and downregulate expression of cathepsin K (141). Conversely, IFNγ has also been reported to indirectly stimulate osteoclast resorptive activity by enhancing RANKL and TNFα production by T cells (140). In vivo, treatment of T cell-deficient nude mice with recombinant IFNγ had no effect on bone density however, adoptive transfer of wildtype T cells into these mice resulted in a significant decrease in vertebral bone mineral density (140).

TGFβ

TGFβ has a complex role in bone remodeling and is thought to have a key contribution in the coupling of the osteoblasts and osteoclasts. TGFβ is expressed in a latent form by numerous cell types, including osteoblasts, stromal cells and bone marrow cells that must be activated to exert its effect (57). TGFβ has been reported to stimulate osteoclastogenesis (142–144) and induce osteoclast apoptosis (145,146). Likewise in osteoblasts, TGFβ has been reported to suppress differentiation (147), inhibit mineralization (148), induce osteoblast precursor migration and proliferation (149) and block apoptosis (150).

Immune Involvement and Gut-Bone Signaling in Pathophysiology

Celiac Disease – immune system and bone responses

Celiac disease is an enteric autoimmune disorder that is triggered by ingestion of gluten; a protein present in wheat, rye, and barley (44). Some of the typical gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of the disease include diarrhea, abdominal pain, distention, weight loss, and failure to thrive in children. Other symptoms may also be present with or without GI symptoms, including anemia, low bone mineral density, elevated liver enzymes, unexpected weight loss, prolonged fatigue and infertility (44).

Celiac disease can severely affect bone health in patients, causing metabolic bone diseases such as low bone mass, osteoporosis, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and osteomalacia (44). Multiple mechanisms can be attributed to the development of these bone disorders. Mucosal atrophy in the intestinal lumen due to celiac disease impairs calcium absorption. This causes a significant increase in parathyroid hormone levels that stimulates bone degradation by osteoclasts in an effort to avoid hypocalcemia. Calcium loss from the bones can lead to osteopenia and osteoporosis, increasing the fracture risk. Celiac disease can also cause hypogonadism, which can subsequently have an adverse effect on the bone (44).

Inflammation from celiac disease is characterized by villus atrophy, crypt cell hyperplasia, and infiltration of T-lymphocytes in epithelial and lamina propria compartments (151). The recruited active T cells produce high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines that can eventually damage intestinal tissue (151). Studies have revealed that celiac disease is associated with exacerbated production of Th1 cytokines (eg. IFNγ and IL-21). In addition, expression of IL-17A, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-15 have been shown to be upregulated in patients with active celiac disease. TNFα and IL-6 are elevated however, in refractory celiac disease (not responsive to a gluten free diet) (151). This elevation in serum pro-inflammatory cytokines observed in celiac disease could directly influence bone remodeling by stimulating osteoclastogenesis or indirectly by increasing the RANKL / OPG ratio (44,152,153). The area most affected by bone remodeling in celiac disease, is the trabecular bone, which is the most metabolically active bone section (44). Increased bone resorption in patients with celiac disease leads to thinner and fewer trabeculae thus resulting in increased fracture risk (44).

Inflammatory Bowel Disease –intestinal immune responses

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic recurrent inflammation of all or part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The most common types of IBD are Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Crohn's disease can affect the GI tract anywhere from the mouth to the anus, with the most common area affected being the ileum. Ulcerative colitis however, is specific to the colon (154,155). In 2014 IBD was reported to affect 1.6 million Americans and as many as 70,000 new cases are reported per year (CCFA). The immune system plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of IBD, with the adaptive immune system thought to be one of the main contributors to IBD pathogenesis (156). Pro-inflammatory cytokine producing T-helper cells are thought to be over-active whereas, anti-inflammatory Tregs are ineffective at resolving the inflammation (156).

At the onset of IBD, weakening of the epithelial barrier promotes increased permeability resulting in increased contact between the intestinal microbiota and the mucosal immune system. This excessive contact causes massive influx of neutrophils as well as loss of tolerance by activating dendritic cells (157). In addition to neutrophils, IBD pathology is also associated with an influx of lymphocytes into the mucosa (156). These cells produce vast quantities of pro-inflammatory cytokines (41,42,158). Increased activation especially of the IL-1 pathway is more active during the onset of inflammation rather than during the sustained phase, especially in the colon (42). Members of the IL-12 family of heterodimeric cytokines including IL-12, IL-23, IL-27, and IL-35 have been shown to be upregulated in antigen presenting cells (42,158), while TNFα has been shown to be enhanced in mononuclear cells. The effects of TNF are suggested to be two-fold; promoting inflammation by binding to its receptors, as well as causing cell death through activation of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 and caspase 3 proteins (42,158).

Among the many immune cell types involved in the pathogenesis of IBD, T lymphocytes are thought to be critical (42). Depending on the type of IBD, involvement of the specific cytokine also differs. In Crohn's Disease, Th1-mediated increases in IFNγ and IL-2 are thought to be important. In contrast, in Ulcerative Colitis Th2-mediated IL-5 and IL-13 have been shown to be critical in the pathogenesis. However, in UC non-classical natural killer T cells have also been identified to have an atypical cytokine response (42). This response has been linked to fibrosis as well as altered tight junction function and apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), driving intestinal epithelial cell ulceration. This response from the NKT cells has been found to be mainly mediated through IL-13 (42).

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) have been shown to have a protective role in colitis; through expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) (42). In CD and UC patients Treg numbers are increased in the inflamed lamina propria compared to uninflamed mucosa and healthy controls. Why these cells fail to control the inflammation is currently unknown however, it has been suggested that effector T cells are resistant to the effects of inhibitory cytokines such as TGF-β in the context of inflammation (40).

Inflammatory Bowel Disease – bone immune responses

IBD is associated with significant and divergent responses in lymphoid and myeloid hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. In a study by Trottier et al (159) the dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced model of colitis resulted in a 60% and 80% increase in monocytic and granulocytic lineages, respectively; consistent with the massive influx of monocytes and neutrophils into the gut. In contrast, the early lineages of B and T cells declined in the marrow and thymus. Furthermore, a significant 40% decrease was also observed in cells of erythrocytic lineage. Because bone marrow is present within the bone structure, it is conceivable that intestinal inflammation such as what is seen in IBD can have profound influences not only on bone marrow composition but also on bone cells themselves and this is aided by changes in and influence of inflammatory cytokines. Previous studies in animal models of IBD demonstrate that inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-11, and IL-17A are linked to decreased bone volume, bone formation rates, and osteoid surface (154,160–164). In some studies, osteoclast surface is increased which further exacerbates bone loss (160). Patients with IBD have elevated levels of pro-inflammatory osteoclastogenic cytokines including; TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-11, IL-17, TGFα, epidermal growth factor, and prostaglandin E2 (154,161). These osteoclasts activators presumably act on the osteoclasts and their precursors promoting osteoclast formation and osteoclast bone resorption. In addition, some of these cytokines can inhibit osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. The dual effects of inflammation lead to a substantial decrease in bone density subsequently resulting in osteoporosis. For a detailed review of how IBD affects bone health, please see elsewhere in this book (chapter X – Francisco Sylvester).

Enteritis

Pathogenic enteric infections may lead to drastic nutrient loss due to sustained diarrhea. These nutrient losses have been associated with a decrease in linear growth observed in children, where such infections are common (165). However, intestinal pathogens can also potentially affect bone growth through pathways other than reduced nutrient absorption. The immune response initiated by an intestinal pathogen may affect the process of long bone growth in children (165).

To study the response of the intestinal immune system to enteric pathogens, Noel et al, treated primary human macrophage-enteroid co-culture with enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains (ETEC and EPEC) (166). ETEC is the most common pathogen that causes traveler's diarrhea while EPEC is associated with cases of fatal diarrhea in children (167,168). EPEC infection resulted in increased macrophage adherence to and projection across a filter into the enteroid monolayer; simulating an immune response where macrophages extend between enterocytes to interact with the pathogen. Macrophages present in ETEC infection also interacted with the bacteria through the filter and even reduced viable ETEC number, suggesting successful phagocytic action. In the absence of macrophages, overnight infection resulted in a loss of barrier function. However, their presence appeared to lessen this effect, further elucidating their protective role in such bacterial infections. While changes in intestinal cytokine expression levels of IFNγ, IL-8, and IL-6 have previously been implicated in affecting bone health (169), expression of these cytokines did not change in ETEC infection (166). This is further supported by the finding that ETEC infection is not associated with impaired linear growth (170). In contrast, enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) has been demonstrated to impair growth in infected children (171). Infected children showed a significant decrease in height when compared to the population. Interestingly, the decline in growth occurred regardless of diarrhea, discounting any effect of major nutrient loss. To examine a possible inflammatory mechanism, IL-8 levels were measured from stool samples and from EAEC-treated Caco 2 cells. IL-8 was elevated in children with persistent diarrhea and was shown to be increased upon exposure to two EAEC strains in in vitro studies (171). Considering previous studies on the role of IL-8 and bone (169), it is possible that an increase in this pro-inflammatory cytokine induced by EAEC infection results in reduced bone growth.

Furthermore, serum TNFα and IL-10 are elevated during enteritis from several bacterial species (172). In rotavirus and norovirus infections, IL-6 and IL-8 have been shown to increase according to the severity of disease (173). Although these studies do not reveal a bone phenotype in relation to the infection, these cytokines have been related to bone formation in other studies. For example, the combination of TNFα and IL-6 has been shown to induce bone resorption via differentiation of osteoclast-like cells (174). The role of TNFα in promoting osteoclast formation is well-established (95). In a model of childhood inflammatory bowel disease, a decrease in the proliferative zone of the tibia was observed and correlated with an increase in serum IL-6 concentration (175). It is possible that the reduction in bone growth seen in affected children is due to the activity of these cytokines. While pathogenic intestinal infection invokes immune responses such as increased macrophage projection and release of inflammatory cytokines, the associated decline in bone growth observed in some pathogenic infections in children is not clearly understood. Studies that measure bone parameters in addition to measuring inflammatory markers and other immune system responses are needed to accurately detail any effect of infection, if any, on bone health.

Dysbiosis and gut-bone immune link

Dysbiosis is characterized as “a compositional and functional alteration in the microbiota that is driven by a set of environmental and host-related factors that perturb the microbial ecosystem to an extent that exceeds its resistance and resilience capabilities” (176). This imbalance of “good” versus “bad” microbiota can be caused by various environmental factors: genetics of the host, diet, obesity, disease, or medical intervention (177). The use of antibiotics for example, disrupts the composition of the gut microorganisms by reducing diversity and deleting or expanding bacterial communities (178). Specifically, streptomycin, one of the most commonly used antibiotics, reduced Firmicutes and depleted Lactobacillus spp, group D Streptococcus spp, Enterococcus spp but expanded Enterobacteriaceae (179); this demonstrates that the use of antibiotics can lead to dysbiosis. In addition to drug intervention, studies have shown that dysbiosis is observed in patients with a wide variety of diseases including: inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) (180), asthma (181) and type II diabetes (182). Diet also plays a role in altering the composition of the gut-microbes. According to Zhang et al. (183), mice fed with a high-fat diet had a reduction in Bifidobacteria spp., while a high-fat and high-sugar diet increased the amount of Clostridium innocuum, Catenibacterium mitsuokai and Enterococcus spp. in the gut (184). In addition, obesity can also change the composition of gut microbiota. Obese humans tend to have a decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes compare to healthy humans (185). Weight loss in obese humans can restore the Bacteroidetes population (186) indicating that obesity has a negative impact on the composition of the human gut-microbiota, which is reversible. Taken together, these findings indicate that a variety of environmental factors can cause dysbiosis which can have serious consequences through altering the intestinal immune system and promoting inflammation (187). Furthermore, these changes can have far reaching effects as seen in bone health and the development of osteoporosis (188).

Dysbiosis also has negative influences on development and homeostasis of host tissue, including the bone (189). Specifically, dysbiosis can lead to the promotion of osteoclast differentiation and resorptive activity through the activation of pro-inflammatory T helper 17 (TH17) cells, resulting in reduced bone mass (190). Moreover, Yan et al (191) found that colonization of conventional specific pathogen-free gut microbiota in germ-free mice increased bone formation and resorption, suggesting that the gut microbiota can have a critical effect on bone remodeling. This link between dysbiosis and bone health can have important implications in infant and adult humans.

Pediatric disease and gut-bone immune link

The importance of the gastrointestinal tract and the associated microbiome in the maturation and development of the immune system has been demonstrated in studies utilizing germ-free (GF) mice. In the absence of the microbiome, germ-free mice have a) significantly fewer Peyer's patches that are hypoplastic and contain few germinal centers, b) smaller mesenteric lymph nodes and c) reduced lamina propria CD4+ T cells (192–194). Moreover, GF mice have less than one tenth of the number of IgA producing B cells compared to a conventional animal (193). Interestingly, exposure of the GF animals to a conventional microbiome results in the development of a ‘normal’ immune system, further supporting the key role of the intestinal bacteria in immune maturation (192,193). The gut bacteria have been demonstrated to influence the development of Th17 cells, Tregs cells and memory T cells (195,196). Studies have shown that segmented filamentous bacteria are required for Th17 development (197), and that members of the Clostridium spp induce colonic Treg differentiation (198).

Emerging evidence supports that early life exposure to microbes may have an effect on later-life susceptibility to disease (199). Dysbiosis of the microbiome in young children can lead to the development of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (200,201). Patients who develop these conditions as children or young adults are at an increased risk of bone fracture. Impairment of linear growth and failure to gain weight is common in children with CD and UC. As a consequence of this these patients have a reduced peak bone mass with significantly lower bone mineral density and bone mineral content, significantly increasing the risk of developing osteoporosis in later life (202).

Aging and the intestinal / bone immune systems

In the elderly both the bone and gut immune systems undergo age-related alterations. This age-related change in the immune system is known as immunosenescence, which contributes to the increased susceptibility of the elderly to infectious disease, cancer and autoimmunity (203). Immunosenescence affects various cell types located in the bone marrow and thymus, lymphocytes located in secondary lymphoid organs and the peripheral blood as well as aspects of the innate immune system (203–205). In bone this change can lead to bone loss resulting in deteriorated structure and function and eventually osteoporosis (206). While in the intestine this can result in a low grade inflammatory status, potentially developing into a more severe pathological condition such as IBD. This can subsequently have adverse effects on bone health (207).

During aging, the hematopoietic compartment of the bone marrow decreases in size and is replaced by fatty deposits (208). Unexpectedly the number of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow increases with age however, these cells exhibit several functional defects including diminished regenerative potential (209). Aging HSCs also exhibit skewed differentiation bias with decreased output of lymphoid and erythrocyte lineage cells. In contrast, output of myeloid cells has been reported to decrease, remain the same or increase (204,209,210). However, aging has been shown to impair the ability of bone marrow macrophages to secrete cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 (210). The number of T cell and B cell progenitors present in the bone marrow and thymus is also significantly reduced with age. The progenitors are also of an inferior quality when compared to their young counterparts as they exhibit reduced proliferative ability and increased apoptosis (211–213). Aging has also been shown to suppress expression of IL-7 by bone marrow stromal cells, a cytokine that is essential for the survival of developing lymphocytes (205,214). What direct effects these changes in bone marrow immune function have on bone health is not well understood.

In addition to changes in the bone immune system, the gastrointestinal lymphoid tissue (GALT) also undergoes significant age-induced modifications which is likely a major factor in the increase in the incidence and severity of infections in the elderly (215). Studies have observed that aging is linked to decreased Peyer's patch size; this is potentially due to impaired movement of immune cells in and out of the Peyer's patches (216). Studies by Ogino et al (217) and Schmucker et al (218) report reduced immune cell migration with age. Further evidence for age-induced changes in the gastrointestinal immune systems is seen in the reduced number of intraepithelial regulatory-type T cell subsets and reduced expression of TGFβ and IL-10 (219). Whether these effects of aging on the gut immune system directly affect bone marrow immune function and if this impacts bone health negatively is not well known.

The Effect of Antibiotics on Gut-Bone Immune Signaling

The use of antibiotics in the past 80 years has saved millions of human lives from bacterial infection. However, oral antibiotic treatment kills both pathogenic and commensal microbes. Commensal microbes have been shown to perform an array of important functions in the human body including regulation of bone health (220,221). Thus it is conceivable that oral antibiotics can impair gut immune function that can negatively influence bone health. While there is evidence for this, the mechanisms of how antibiotic treatment alters the interaction between the microbiome and the immune system is not well understood. There have been relatively few studies that have investigated the effect of antibiotic depletion of the gut microbiome on bone health. In a study by Cho et al (222), weaned female C57BL/6 mice were treated with antibiotics (penicillin, vancomycin, chlortetracycline) for 3 weeks and displayed an increase in total body bone mineral density (BMD) compared to the untreated mice. Interestingly, after 7 weeks of treatment, BMD was comparable between the treated and untreated groups (222). Cox et al (223) treated C57BL/6 male and female mice with low dose penicillin for 20 weeks (either before birth or from weaning) and found a small but significant increase in bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD in female mice. In contrast, males, given antibiotics before birth, exhibited a significant decrease in BMC (223). These effects were thought to be linked to the microbiome affecting the differentiation of stem cells into osteoblasts, adipocytes or myocytes. Taken together, these studies emphasize the complexity of bone responses to antibiotic treatment and highlight the importance of variables such as length of treatment, mouse strain/sex and age, and potentially mouse microbiome.

Conclusion

The intestine is residence to the largest number of immune cells in the body. These immune cells are intricately associated with the intestinal microbiota and subsequent changes in the microbiota can have both local and systemic beneficial or adverse effects. Recent studies implicate a gut–bone axis where changes to the intestine can affect distal bone health. Indeed, dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, either through disease, aging or antibiotics, can alter the intestinal immune system leading to increased inflammation and subsequently resulting in bone loss and the development of osteoporosis.

References

  • 1.Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Oct;14(10):667–85. doi: 10.1038/nri3738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Helander HF, Fändriks L. Surface area of the digestive tract – revisited. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(6):681–9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.898326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Savage DC. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31:107–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.000543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oozeer R, Rescigno M, Ross RP, Knol J, Blaut M, Khlebnikov A, et al. Gut health: predictive biomarkers for preventive medicine and development of functional foods. Br J Nutr. 2010;103(10):1539–44. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tenorio MD, Espinosa-Martos I, Préstamo G, Rupérez P. Soybean whey enhance mineral balance and caecal fermentation in rats. Eur J Nutr. 2010;49(3):155–63. doi: 10.1007/s00394-009-0060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sjögren K, Engdahl C, Henning P, Lerner UH, Tremaroli V, Lagerquist MK, et al. The gut microbiota regulates bone mass in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jun;27(6):1357–67. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kelsall BL, Leon F. Involvement of intestinal dendritic cells in oral tolerance, immunity to pathogens, and inflammatory bowel disease. Immulogical Reviews. 2005;206:132–48. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alpan O. Oral tolerance and gut-oriented immune response to dietary proteins. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2001;1(6):572–7. doi: 10.1007/s11882-001-0067-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ouellette AJ. Paneth cells and innate mucosal immunity. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26(6):547–53. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833dccde. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cornick S, Tawiah A, Chadee K. Roles and regulation of the mucus barrier in the gut. Tissue Barriers. 2015;3(1–2):e982426. doi: 10.4161/21688370.2014.982426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johansson MEV, Hansson GC. Immunological aspects of intestinal mucus and mucins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):639–49. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hansson GC, Johansson MEV. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2010;1(1):51–4. doi: 10.4161/gmic.1.1.10470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johansson MEV, Ambort D, Pelaseyed T, Schütte A, Gustafsson JK, Ermund A, et al. Composition and functional role of the mucus layers in the intestine. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(22):3635–41. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0822-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheroutre H, Lambolez F, Mucida D. The light and dark sides of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Jun 17;11(7):445–56. doi: 10.1038/nri3007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shires J, Theodoridis E, Hayday AC. Biological insights into TCRgammadelta+ and TCRalphabeta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes provided by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) Immunity. 2001 Sep;15(3):419–34. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00192-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kühl Aa, Pawlowski NN, Grollich K, Loddenkemper C, Zeitz M, Hoffmann JC. Aggravation of intestinal inflammation by depletion/deficiency of gammadelta T cells in different types of IBD animal models. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(1):168–75. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1105696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Komano H, Fujiura Y, Kawaguchi M, Matsumoto S, Hashimoto Y, Obana S, et al. Homeostatic regulation of intestinal epithelia by intraepithelial gamma delta T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(13):6147–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.13.6147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kawaguchi-Miyashita M, Shimada S, Kurosu H, Kato-Nagaoka N, Matsuoka Y, Ohwaki M, et al. An accessory role of TCRgammadelta (+) cells in the exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease in TCRalpha mutant mice. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(4):980–8. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200104)31:4<980::aid-immu980>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cornes JS. Number, size, and distribution of Peyer's patches in the human small intestine: Part I The development of Peyer's patches. Gut. 1965 Jun;6(3):225–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.6.3.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mabbott NA, Donaldson DS, Ohno H, Williams IR, Mahajan A. Microfold (M) cells: important immunosurveillance posts in the intestinal epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2013 Jul;6(4):666–77. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jung C, Hugot JP, Barreau F. Peyer's Patches: The Immune Sensors of the Intestine. Int J Inflam. 2010 Sep 19;2010:823710. doi: 10.4061/2010/823710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Owen RL, Piazza AJ, Ermak TH. Ultrastructural and cytoarchitectural features of lymphoreticular organs in the colon and rectum of adult BALB/c mice. Am J Anat. 1991 Jan;190(1):10–8. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001900103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(4):331–41. doi: 10.1038/nri1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Herbrand H, Bernhardt G, Förster R, Pabst O. Dynamics and function of solitary intestinal lymphoid tissue. Crit Rev Immunol. 2008;28(1):1–13. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v28.i1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsuji M, Suzuki K, Kitamura H, Maruya M, Kinoshita K, Ivanov II, et al. Requirement for lymphoid tissue-inducer cells in isolated follicle formation and T cell-independent immunoglobulin A generation in the gut. Immunity. 2008 Aug 15;29(2):261–71. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pabst O, Herbrand H, Worbs T, Friedrichsen M, Yan S, Hoffmann MW, et al. Cryptopatches and isolated lymphoid follicles: Dynamic lymphoid tissues dispensable for the generation of intraepithelial lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35(1):98–107. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pabst O, Herbrand H, Friedrichsen M, Velaga S, Dorsch M, Berhardt G, et al. Adaptation of Solitary Intestinal Lymphoid Tissue in Response to Microbiota and Chemokine Receptor CCR7 Signaling. J Immunol. 2006;177(10):6824–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.6824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sathaliyawala T, Kubota M, Yudanin N, Turner D, Camp P, Thome JJC, et al. Distribution and compartmentalization of human circulating and tissue-resident memory T cell subsets. Immunity. 2013 Jan 24;38(1):187–97. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wolff MJ, Leung JM, Davenport M, Poles MA, Cho I, Loke P. TH17, TH22 and Treg cells are enriched in the healthy human cecum. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brandtzaeg P. Function of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in antibody formation. Immunol Invest. 2010;39(4–5):303–55. doi: 10.3109/08820131003680369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cerovic V, Bain CC, Mowat AM, Milling SWF. Intestinal macrophages and dendritic cells: what's the difference? Trends Immunol. 2014 Jun;35(6):270–7. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ueda Y, Kayama H, Jeon SG, Kusu T, Isaka Y, Rakugi H, et al. Commensal microbiota induce LPS hyporesponsiveness in colonic macrophages via the production of IL-10. Int Immunol. 2010 Dec;22(12):953–62. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Persson EK, Jaensson E, Agace WW. The diverse ontogeny and function of murine small intestinal dendritic cell/macrophage subsets. Immunobiology. 2010;215(9–10):692–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rescigno M. Intestinal dendritic cells. Adv Immunol. (1st) 2010;107(C):109–38. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381300-8.00004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bischoff SC. Physiological and pathophysiological functions of intestinal mast cells. Semin Immunopathol. 2009 Jul;31(2):185–205. doi: 10.1007/s00281-009-0165-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chu VT, Beller A, Rausch S, Strandmark J, Zänker M, Arbach O, et al. Eosinophils promote generation and maintenance of immunoglobulin-A-expressing plasma cells and contribute to gut immune homeostasis. Immunity. 2014 Apr 17;40(4):582–93. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alexander JS, Ganta VC, Jordan PA, Witte MH. Gastrointestinal lymphatics in health and disease. Pathophysiol Off J Int Soc Pathophysiol. 2010 Sep;17(4):315–35. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Macpherson AJ, Smith K. Mesenteric lymph nodes at the center of immune anatomy. J Exp Med. 2006 Mar 20;203(3):497–500. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kaser A, Zeissig S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory bowel disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28(5):573–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Strober W, Fuss IJ. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011 May;140(6):1756–67. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(5):329–42. doi: 10.1038/nri3661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bjarnason I, Macpherson A, Mackintosh C, Buxton-Thomas M, Forgacs I, Moniz C. Reduced bone density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1997 Feb;40(2):228–33. doi: 10.1136/gut.40.2.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zanchetta MB, Longobardi V, Bai JC. Bone and Celiac Disease. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016;14(2):43–8. doi: 10.1007/s11914-016-0304-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they do it? Am J Pathol. 2007 Feb;170(2):427–35. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pederson L, Ruan M, Westendorf JJ, Khosla S, Oursler MJ. Regulation of bone formation by osteoclasts involves Wnt/BMP signaling and the chemokine sphingosine-1-phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(52):20764–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805133106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sims NA, Martin TJ. Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit. Bonekey Rep. 2014;3(August 2013):481. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2013.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Broere F, Apasov SG, Sitkovsky MV, Eden W Van. T cell subsets and T cell-mediated immunity. In: Nijkamp F, Parnham MJ, editors. Principles of Immunopharmacology 3rd revise. Birkhäuser; Basel: 2011. pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li Y, Toraldo G, Li A, Yang X, Zhang H, Qian WP, et al. B cells and T cells are critical for the preservation of bone homeostasis and attainment of peak bone mass in vivo. Blood. 2007;109(9):3839–48. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Toraldo G, Roggia C, Qian WP, Pacifici R, Weitzmann MN. IL-7 induces bone loss in vivo by induction of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand and tumor necrosis factor alpha from T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(1):125–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0136772100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Grcević D, Lee SK, Marusić a, Lorenzo Ja. Depletion of CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in mice in vivo enhances 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated osteoclast-like cell formation in vitro by a mechanism that is dependent on prostaglandin synthesis. J Immunol. 2000;165(8):4231–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Boyce BF, Li P, Yao Z, Zhang Q, Badell IR, Schwarz EM, et al. TNF-alpha and pathologic bone resorption. Keio J Med. 2005 Oct;54(3):127–31. doi: 10.2302/kjm.54.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Romagnani S. T-cell subsets (Th1 versus Th2) Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Jul;85(1):9–18. 21. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62426-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, Xia B. CD4+T cells: differentiation and functions. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:925135. doi: 10.1155/2012/925135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sato K, Suematsu A, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi A, Morishita Y, Kadono Y, et al. Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J Exp Med. 2006;203(12):2673–82. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zaiss MM, Axmann R, Zwerina J, Polzer K, Gückel E, Skapenko A, et al. Treg cells suppress osteoclast formation: A new link between the immune system and bone. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(12):4104–12. doi: 10.1002/art.23138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mori G, D'Amelio P, Faccio R, Brunetti G. The Interplay between the bone and the immune system. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:720504. doi: 10.1155/2013/720504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Luo CY, Wang L, Sun C, Li DJ. Estrogen enhances the functions of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells that suppress osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in vitro. Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;8(1):50–8. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2010.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim YG, Lee CK, Nah SS, Mun SH, Yoo B, Moon HB. Human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibit the differentiation of osteoclasts from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357(4):1046–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kikuta J, Wada Y, Kowada T, Wang Z, Sun-Wada GHH, Nishiyama I, et al. Dynamic visualization of RANKL and Th17-mediated osteoclast function. J Clin Invest. 2013 Mar 1;123(2):866–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI65054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pène J, Chevalier S, Preisser L, Vénéreau E, Guilleux MHMH, Ghannam S, et al. Chronically Inflamed Human Tissues Are Infiltrated by Highly Differentiated Th17 Lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2008;180(11):7423–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Choi Y, Woo KM, Ko SH, Lee YJ, Park SJ, Kim HM, et al. Osteoclastogenesis is enhanced by activated B cells but suppressed by activated CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(7):2179–88. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200107)31:7<2179::aid-immu2179>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.John V, Hock JM, Short LL, Glasebrook AL, Galvin RJ. A role for CD8+ T lymphocytes in osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Endocrinology. 1996 Jun;137(6):2457–63. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.6.8641199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Terauchi M, Li JY, Bedi B, Baek KH, Tawfeek H, Galley S, et al. T Lymphocytes Amplify the Anabolic Activity of Parathyroid Hormone through Wnt10b Signaling. Cell Metab. 2009;10(3):229–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bedi B, Li JY, Tawfeek H, Baek KH, Adams J, Vangara SS, et al. Silencing of parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor 1 in T cells blunts the bone anabolic activity of PTH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(12):E725–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120735109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kiesel JR, Buchwald ZS, Aurora R. Cross-presentation by osteoclasts induces FoxP3 in CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2009;182(9):5477–87. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Buchwald ZS, Kiesel JR, DiPaolo R, Pagadala MS, Aurora R. Osteoclast activated FoxP3 + CD8 + T-cells suppress bone resorption in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Buchwald ZS, Kiesel JR, Yang C, DiPaolo R, Novack DV, Aurora R. Osteoclast-induced Foxp3+ CD8 T-cells limit bone loss in mice. Bone. 2013;56(1):163–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Horowitz MC, Fretz JA, Lorenzo JA. How B cells influence bone biology in health and disease. Bone. 2010 Sep;47(3):472–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Manilay JO, Zouali M. Tight relationships between B lymphocytes and the skeletal system. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(7):405–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Masuzawa T, Miyaura C, Onoe Y, Kusano K, Ohta H, Nozawa S, et al. Estrogen deficiency stimulates B lymphopoiesis in mouse bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 1994;94(3):1090–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI117424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Erlandsson MC, Jonsson CA, Islander U, Ohlsson C, Carlsten H. Oestrogen receptor specificity in oestradiol-mediated effects on B lymphopoiesis and immunoglobulin production in male mice. Immunology. 2003;108(3):346–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01599.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Eghbali-Fatourechi G, Khosla S, Sanyal A, Boyle WJ, Lacey DL, Riggs BL. Role of RANK ligand in mediating increased bone resorption in early postmenopausal women. J Clin Invest. 2003 Apr;111(8):1221–30. doi: 10.1172/JCI17215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Onal M, Xiong J, Chen X, Thostenson JD, Almeida M, Manolagas SC, et al. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) protein expression by B lymphocytes contributes to ovariectomy-induced bone loss. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(35):29851–60. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.377945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weitzmann MN, Cenci S, Haug J, Brown C, DiPersio J, Pacifici R. B lymphocytes inhibit human osteoclastogenesis by secretion of TGFβ. J Cell Biochem. 2000;78(2):318–24. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(20000801)78:2<318::aid-jcb13>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Heider U, Langelotz C, Jakob C, Zavrski I, Fleissner C, Eucker J, et al. Expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand on bone marrow plasma cells correlates with osteolytic bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(4):1436–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Oranger A, Carbone C, Izzo M, Grano M. Cellular mechanisms of multiple myeloma bone disease. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013(8):289458. doi: 10.1155/2013/289458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Colucci S, Brunetti G, Oranger A, Mori G, Sardone F, Specchia G, et al. Myeloma cells suppress osteoblasts through sclerostin secretion. Blood Cancer J. 2011 Jun;1(6):e27. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Thorbert-Mros S, Larsson L, Berglundh T. Cellular composition of long-standing gingivitis and periodontitis lesions. J Periodontal Res. 2014;(4):535–43. doi: 10.1111/jre.12236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Abe T, AlSarhan M, Benakanakere MR, Maekawa T, Kinane DF, Cancro MP, et al. The B Cell-Stimulatory Cytokines BLyS and APRIL Are Elevated in Human Periodontitis and Are Required for B Cell-Dependent Bone Loss in Experimental Murine Periodontitis. J Immunol. 2015 Aug 15;195(4):1427–35. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Oliver-Bell J, Butcher JP, Malcolm J, Macleod MKL, Adrados Planell A, Campbell L, et al. Periodontitis in the absence of B cells and specific anti-bacterial antibody. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2015;30(2):160–9. doi: 10.1111/omi.12082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang ECY, Newton Z, Hayward Oa, Clark SR, Collins F, Perks WV, et al. Regulation of early cartilage destruction in inflammatory arthritis by death receptor 3. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ) 2014 Oct;66(10):2762–72. doi: 10.1002/art.38770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tanaka D, Kagari T, Doi H, Shimozato T. Essential role of neutrophils in anti-type II collagen antibody and lipopolysaccharide-induced arthritis. Immunology. 2006;119(2):195–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02424.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wipke BT, Allen PM. Essential Role of Neutrophils in the Initiation and Progression of a Murine Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Immunol. 2001;167(3):1601–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kantarci A, Oyaizu K, Van Dyke TE. Neutrophil-mediated tissue injury in periodontal disease pathogenesis: findings from localized aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2003 Jan;74(1):66–75. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chakravarti A, Raquil MA, Tessier P, Poubelle PE. Surface RANKL of Toll-like receptor 4-stimulated human neutrophils activates osteoclastic bone resorption. Blood. 2009;114(8):1633–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-178301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wythe SE, Nicolaidou V, Horwood NJ. Cells of the immune system orchestrate changes in bone cell function. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014 Jan;94(1):98–111. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9764-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rivollier A, Mazzorana M, Tebib J, Piperno M, Aitsiselmi T, Rabourdin-Combe C, et al. Immature dendritic cell transdifferentiation into osteoclasts: a novel pathway sustained by the rheumatoid arthritis microenvironment. Blood. 2004 Dec 15;104(13):4029–37. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Speziani C, Rivollier A, Gallois A, Coury F, Mazzorana M, Azocar O, et al. Murine dendritic cell transdifferentiation into osteoclasts is differentially regulated by innate and adaptive cytokines. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37(3):747–57. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Alnaeeli M, Penninger JM, Teng YTA. Immune interactions with CD4+ T cells promote the development of functional osteoclasts from murine CD11c+ dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2006;177(5):3314–26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Maitra R, Follenzi A, Yaghoobian A, Montagna C, Merlin S, Cannizzo ES, et al. Dendritic cell-mediated in vivo bone resorption. J Immunol. 2010 Aug 1;185(3):1485–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Osta B, Benedetti G, Miossec P. Classical and paradoxical effects of TNF-alpha on bone homeostasis. Front Immunol. 2014;5(FEB):1–9. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hofbauer LC, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL, Khosla S. Interleukin-1B and tumor necrosis factor-a, but not interleukin-6, stimulate osteoprotegerin ligand gene expression in human osteoblastic cells. Bone. 1999;25(3):255–9. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00162-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wei S, Kitaura H, Zhou P, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. IL-1 mediates TNF-induced osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2005 Feb;115(2):282–90. doi: 10.1172/JCI23394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Azuma Y, Kaji K, Katogi R, Takeshita S, Kudo A. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces differentiation of and bone resorption by osteoclasts. J Biol Chem. 2000 Feb 18;275(7):4858–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lam J, Takeshita S, Barker JE, Kanagawa O, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. TNF-alpha induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J Clin Invest. 2000 Dec;106(12):1481–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI11176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kitaura H, Kimura K, Ishida M, Kohara H, Yoshimatsu M, Takano-Yamamoto T. Immunological reaction in TNF alpha-mediated osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/181849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Feldmann M. Development of anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 May;2(5):364–71. doi: 10.1038/nri802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kimble RB, Bain S, Pacifici R. The functional block of TNF but not of IL-6 prevents bone loss in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(6):935–41. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Frost A, Jonsson KB, Nilsson O, Ljunggren O. Inflammatory cytokines regulate proliferation of cultured human osteoblasts. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Apr;68(2):91–6. doi: 10.3109/17453679709003987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Gilbert LC, Chen H, Lu X, Nanes MS. Chronic low dose tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) suppresses early bone accrual in young mice by inhibiting osteoblasts without affecting osteoclasts. Bone. 2013;56(1):174–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC. Osteoblast programmed cell death (apoptosis): modulation by growth factors and cytokines. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 May;13(5):793–802. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kawakami A, Eguchi K, Matsuoka N, Tsuboi M, Koji T, Urayama S, et al. Fas and Fas ligand interaction is necessary for human osteoblast apoptosis. J Bone Min Res. 1997;12(10):1637–46. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kovacić N, Lukić IK, Grcević D, Katavić V, Croucher P, Marusić A, et al. The Fas/Fas ligand system inhibits differentiation of murine osteoblasts but has a limited role in osteoblast and osteoclast apoptosis. J Immunol. 2007 Mar 15;178(6):3379–89. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.6.3379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Huang H, Zhao N, Xu X, Xu Y, Li S, Zhang J, et al. Dose-specific effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2011;44(5):420–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00769.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bull MJ, Williams AS, Mecklenburgh Z, Calder CJ, Twohig JP, Elford C, et al. The Death Receptor 3-TNF-like protein 1A pathway drives adverse bone pathology in inflammatory arthritis. J Exp Med. 2008 Oct 27;205(11):2457–64. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Collins FL, Williams JO, Bloom AC, Singh RK, Jordan L, Stone MD, et al. CCL3 and MMP-9 are induced by TL1A during death receptor 3 (TNFRSF25)-dependent osteoclast function and systemic bone loss. Bone. 2017 Apr;97:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bamias G, Siakavellas SI, Stamatelopoulos KS, Chryssochoou E, Papamichael C, Sfikakis PP. Circulating levels of TNF-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) and its decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Immunol. 2008 Nov;129(2):249–55. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Collins FL, Williams JO, Bloom AC, Stone MD, Choy E, Wang ECY, et al. Death Receptor 3 (TNFRSF25) increases mineral apposition by osteoblasts and region specific new bone formation in the axial skeleton of male DBA/1 mice. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/901679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Edwards JR, Sun SG, Locklin R, Shipman CM, Adamopoulos IE, Athanasou Na, et al. LIGHT (TNFSF14), a novel mediator of bone resorption, is elevated in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1451–62. doi: 10.1002/art.21821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Brunetti G, Rizzi R, Oranger A, Gigante I, Mori G, Taurino G, et al. LIGHT/TNFSF14 increases osteoclastogenesis and decreases osteoblastogenesis in multiple myeloma-bone disease. Oncotarget. 2014;5(24):12950–67. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lorenzo J, Horowitz M, Choi Y. Osteoimmunology: Interactions of the bone and immune system. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(4):403–40. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Colucci S, Brunetti G, Cantatore FP, Oranger A, Mori G, Pignataro P, et al. The death receptor DR5 is involved in TRAIL-mediated human osteoclast apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2007;12(9):1623–32. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Atkins G, Bouralexis S, Evdokiou a, Hay S, Labrinidis a, Zannettino aC, et al. Human osteoblasts are resistant to Apo2L/TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Bone. 2002 Oct;31(4):448–56. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00858-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zauli G, Rimondi E, Stea S, Baruffaldi F, Stebel M, Zerbinati C, et al. TRAIL inhibits osteoclastic differentiation by counteracting RANKL-dependent p27Kip1 accumulation in pre-osteoclast precursors. J Cell Physiol. 2008 Jan;214(1):117–25. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lorenzo JA, Naprta A, Rao Y, Alander C, Glaccum M, Widmer M, et al. Mice lacking the type I interleukin-1 receptor do not lose bone mass after ovariectomy. Endocrinology. 1998;139(6):3022–5. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.6.6128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kimble RB, Matayoshi AB, Vannice JL, Kung VT, Williams C, Pacifici R. Simultaneous block of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor is required to completely prevent bone loss in the early postovariectomy period. Endocrinology. 1995 Jul;136(7):3054–61. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.7.7789332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Williams RO, Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Feldmann M, Maini RN. Evaluation of TNF-alpha and IL-1 blockade in collagen-induced arthritis and comparison with combined anti-TNF-alpha/anti-CD4 therapy. J Immunol. 2000;165:7240–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lee YM, Fujikado N, Manaka H, Yasuda H, Iwakura Y. IL-1 plays an important role in the bone metabolism under physiological conditions. Int Immunol. 2010;22(10):805–16. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Akatsu T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Imamura K, Yamaguchi A, Sato K, et al. Role of prostaglandins in interleukin-1-induced bone resorption in mice in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Feb;6(2):183–9. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Jimi E, Nakamura I, Duong LT, Ikebe T, Takahashi N, Rodan Ga, et al. Interleukin 1 induces multinucleation and bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts in the absence of osteoblasts/stromal cells. Exp Cell Res. 1999;247(1):84–93. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Jimi E, Shuto T, Koga T. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-1 alpha maintain the survival of osteoclast-like cells. Endocrinology. 1995 Feb;136(2):808–11. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.2.7835314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jimi E, Nakamura I, Ikebe T, Akiyama S, Takahashi N, Suda T. Activation of NF-kappaB is involved in the survival of osteoclasts promoted by interleukin-1. J Biol Chem. 1998 Apr 10;273(15):8799–805. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.15.8799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.al-Humidan A, Ralston SH, Hughes DE, Chapman K, Aarden L, Russell RG, et al. Interleukin-6 does not stimulate bone resorption in neonatal mouse calvariae. J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Jan;6(1):3–8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ishimi Y, Miyaura C, Jin CH, Akatsu T, Abe E, Nakamura Y, et al. IL-6 is produced by osteoblasts and induces bone resorption. J Immunol. 1990 Nov 15;145(10):3297–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yoshitake F, Itoh S, Narita H, Ishihara K, Ebisu S. Interleukin-6 directly inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing receptor activator of NF-kappaB signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2008 Apr 25;283(17):11535–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jilka RL, Hangoc G, Girasole G, Passeri G, Williams DC, Abrams JS, et al. Increased osteoclast development after estrogen loss: mediation by interleukin-6. Science. 1992 Jul 3;257(5066):88–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1621100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Poli V, Balena R, Fattori E, Markatos A, Yamamoto M, Tanaka H, et al. Interleukin-6 deficient mice are protected from bone loss caused by estrogen depletion. EMBO J. 1994;13(5):1189–96. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06368.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Mossetti G, Rendina D, De Filippo G, Viceconti R, Di Domenico G, Cioffi M, et al. Interleukin-6 and osteoprotegerin systems in Paget's disease of bone: Relationship to risedronate treatment. Bone. 2005;36(3):549–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, Pavelka K, Bröll J, Balint G, et al. Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an incomplete response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2817–29. doi: 10.1002/art.22033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Weitzmann M, Roggia C. Increased production of IL-7 uncouples bone formation from bone resorption during estrogen deficiency. J Clin …. 2002;110(11) doi: 10.1172/JCI15687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.D'Amelio P, Grimaldi A, Bernabei P, Pescarmona GP, Isaia G. Immune system and bone metabolism: Does thymectomy influence postmenopausal bone loss in humans? Bone. 2006;39(3):658–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Evans KE, Fox SW. Interleukin-10 inhibits osteoclastogenesis by reducing NFATc1 expression and preventing its translocation to the nucleus. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mohamed SGK, Sugiyama E, Shinoda K, Taki H, Hounoki H, Abdel-Aziz HO, et al. Interleukin-10 inhibits RANKL-mediated expression of NFATc1 in part via suppression of c-Fos and c-Jun in RAW264.7 cells and mouse bone marrow cells. Bone. 2007;41(4):592–602. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Liu D, Yao S, Wise GE. Effect of interleukin-10 on gene expression of osteoclastogenic regulatory molecules in the rat dental follicle. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114(1):42–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Adamopoulos IE, Chao CC, Geissler R, Laface D, Blumenschein W, Iwakura Y, et al. Interleukin-17A upregulates receptor activator of NF-kappaB on osteoclast precursors. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(1):R29. doi: 10.1186/ar2936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Adamopoulos IE, Bowman EP. Immune regulation of bone loss by Th17 cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(5):225. doi: 10.1186/ar2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Croes M, Öner FC, van Neerven D, Sabir E, Kruyt MC, Blokhuis TJ, et al. Proinflammatory T cells and IL-17 stimulate osteoblast differentiation. Bone. 2016;84:262–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Takayanagi H, Ogasawara K, Hida S, Chiba T, Murata S, Sato K, et al. T-cell-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma. Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):600–5. doi: 10.1038/35046102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Gao Y, Grassi F, Ryan MR, Terauchi M, Page K, Yang X, et al. IFN-gamma stimulates osteoclast formation and bone loss in vivo via antigen-driven T cell activation. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(1):122–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI30074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Kamolmatyakul S, Chen W, Li YP. Interferon-gamma down-regulates gene expression of cathepsin K in osteoclasts and inhibits osteoclast formation. J Dent Res. 2001;80(1):351–5. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800011001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Itonaga I, Sabokbar A, Sun S, Kudo O, Danks L, Ferguson D, et al. Transforming growth factor-β induces osteoclast formation in the absence of RANKL. Bone. 2004;34(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yasui T, Kadono Y, Nakamura M, Oshima Y, Matsumoto T, Masuda H, et al. Regulation of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by TGF-beta through molecular interaction between Smad3 and Traf6. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(7):1447–56. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Fuller K, Lean JM, Bayley KE, Wani MR, Chambers TJ. A role for TGFbeta(1) in osteoclast differentiation and survival. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 1):2445–53. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.13.2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Houde N, Chamoux E, Bisson M, Roux S. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) induces human osteoclast apoptosis by up-regulating bim. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(35):23397–404. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.019372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Murakami T, Yamamoto M, Ono K, Nishikawa M, Nagata N, Motoyoshi K, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 increases mRNA levels of osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor in osteoblastic/stromal cells and inhibits the survival of murine osteoclast-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;252(3):747–52. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lian N, Lin T, Liu W, Wang W, Li N, Sun S, et al. Transforming growth factor β suppresses osteoblast differentiation via the vimentin activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) axis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(43):35975–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.372458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Matsunobu T, Torigoe K, Ishikawa M, de Vega S, Kulkarni AB, Iwamoto Y, et al. Critical roles of the TGF-beta type I receptor ALK5 in perichondrial formation and function, cartilage integrity, and osteoblast differentiation during growth plate development. Dev Biol. 2009 Aug 15;332(2):325–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Tang Y, Wu X, Lei W, Pang L, Wan C, Shi Z, et al. TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation. Nat Med. 2009 Jul;15(7):757–65. doi: 10.1038/nm.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Karsdal MA, Larsen L, Engsig MT, Lou H, Ferreras M, Lochter A, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-dependent activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta controls the conversion of osteoblasts into osteocytes by blocking osteoblast apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(46):44061–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207205200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Caruso R, Marafini I, Sedda S, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Giuffrida P, MacDonald TT, et al. Analysis of the cytokine profile in the duodenal mucosa of refractory coeliac disease patients. Clin Sci (Lond) 2014;126(6):451–8. doi: 10.1042/CS20130478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Manavalan JS, Hernandez L, Shah JG, Konikkara J, Naiyer AJ, Lee AR, et al. Serum cytokine elevations in celiac disease: Association with disease presentation. Hum Immunol. 2010;71(1):50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.09.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Fiore CE, Pennisi P, Ferro G, Ximenes B, Privitelli L, Mangiafico RA, et al. Altered osteoprotegerin/RANKL ratio and low bone mineral density in celiac patients on long-term treatment with gluten-free diet. Horm Metab Res. 2006 Jun;38(6):417–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ciucci T, Ibáñez L, Boucoiran A, Birgy-Barelli E, Pène J, Abou-Ezzi G, et al. Bone marrow Th17 TNFα cells induce osteoclast differentiation, and link bone destruction to IBD. Gut. 2015 Jul;64(7):1072–81. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Corridoni D, Arseneau KO, Cominelli F. Inflammatory bowel disease. Immunol Lett. 2014 Oct;161(2):231–5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Wallace KL, Zheng LB, Kanazawa Y, Shih DQ. Immunopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 7;20(1):6–21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Fournier BM, Parkos Ca. The role of neutrophils during intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2012 Jul;5(4):354–66. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Grainger JR, Konkel JE, Zangerle-Murray T, Shaw TN. Macrophages in gastrointestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Pflugers Arch. 2017 Apr;469(3–4):527–39. doi: 10.1007/s00424-017-1958-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Trottier MD, Irwin R, Li Y, McCabe LR, Fraker PJ. Enhanced production of early lineages of monocytic and granulocytic cells in mice with colitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(41):16594–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213854109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Metzger CE, Narayanan A, Zawieja DC, Bloomfield SA. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Rodent Model Alters Osteocyte Protein Levels Controlling Bone Turnover. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Apr;32(4):802–13. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ali T, Lam D, Bronze MS, Humphrey MB. Osteoporosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Am J Med. 2009;122(7):599–604. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Harris L, Senagore P, Young VB, McCabe LR. Inflammatory bowel disease causes reversible suppression of osteoblast and chondrocyte function in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296(5):G1020–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90696.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Irwin R, Lee T, Young VB, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. Colitis-induced bone loss is gender dependent and associated with increased inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(8):1586–97. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318289e17b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Irwin R, Raehtz S, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. Intestinal inflammation without weight loss decreases bone density and growth. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016 Dec 1;311(6):R1149–57. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00051.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Stephensen CB. Burden of infection on growth failure. J Nutr. 1999 Feb;129(2S Suppl):534S–538S. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.2.534S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Noel G, Baetz NW, Staab JF, Donowitz M, Kovbasnjuk O, Pasetti MF, et al. A primary human macrophage-enteroid co-culture model to investigate mucosal gut physiology and host-pathogen interactions. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45270. doi: 10.1038/srep45270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Chen HD, Frankel G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: unravelling pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jan;29(1):83–98. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Fleckenstein JM, Hardwidge PR, Munson GP, Rasko DA, Sommerfelt H, Steinsland H. Molecular mechanisms of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection. Microbes Infect. 2010 Feb;12(2):89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Souza PPC, Lerner UH. The role of cytokines in inflammatory bone loss. Immunol Invest. 2013;42(7):555–622. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2013.822766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Black RE, Brown KH, Becker S. Effects of diarrhea associated with specific enteropathogens on the growth of children in rural Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 1984 Jun;73(6):799–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Steiner TS, Lima AA, Nataro JP, Guerrant RL. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli produce intestinal inflammation and growth impairment and cause interleukin-8 release from intestinal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;177(1):88–96. doi: 10.1086/513809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Hsu TR, Chen SJ, Wu TC, Chung RL, Tang RB. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 in viral and bacterial gastroenteritis in children. J Chin Med Assoc. 2005 Jun;68(6):250–3. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70145-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Chen SM, Lin CP, Tsai JD, Chao YH, Sheu JN. The significance of serum and fecal levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in hospitalized children with acute rotavirus and norovirus gastroenteritis. Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Apr;55(2):120–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Yokota K, Sato K, Miyazaki T, Kitaura H, Kayama H, Miyoshi F, et al. Combination of tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin-6 induces mouse osteoclast-like cells with bone resorption activity both in vitro and in vivo. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ) 2014 Jan;66(1):121–9. doi: 10.1002/art.38218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Koniaris SG, Fisher SE, Rubin CT, Chawla A. Experimental colitis impairs linear bone growth independent of nutritional factors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997 Aug;25(2):137–41. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199708000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, Elinav E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(4):219–32. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Petersen C, Round JL. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(7):1024–33. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ubeda C, Pamer EG. Antibiotics, microbiota, and immune defense. Trends Immunol. 2012 Sep;33(9):459–66. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Sekirov I, Tam NM, Jogova M, Robertson ML, Li Y, Lupp C, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun. 2008 Oct;76(10):4726–36. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00319-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman Ra, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug;104(34):21. 13780–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706625104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Abrahamsson TR, Jakobsson HE, Andersson AF, Björkstén B, Engstrand L, Jenmalm MC. Low gut microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Jun;44(6):842–50. doi: 10.1111/cea.12253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergström G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature12198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Zhang C, Zhang M, Wang S, Han R, Cao Y, Hua W, et al. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet relevant to development of metabolic syndromes in mice. ISME J. 2010 Feb;4(2):232–41. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2009 Nov 11;1(6):6ra14. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 2;101(44):15718–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407076101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients. 2012;4(8):1095–119. doi: 10.3390/nu4081095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.McCabe LR, Britton Ra, Parameswaran N. Prebiotic and Probiotic Regulation of Bone Health: Role of the Intestine and its Microbiome. Osteoporos Int. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0292-x. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Ohlsson C, Sjögren K. Effects of the gut microbiota on bone mass. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;26(2):69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Sommer F, Bäckhed F. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Apr;11(4):227–38. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Yan J, Herzog JW, Tsang K, Brennan CA, Bower MA, Garrett WS, et al. Gut microbiota induce IGF-1 and promote bone formation and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(47):E7554–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607235113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–23. doi: 10.1038/nri2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Ouwehand A, Isolauri E, Salminen S. The role of the intestinal microflora for the development of the immune system in early childhood. Eur J Nutr. 2002;41(1):I32–7. doi: 10.1007/s00394-002-1105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004 Jun;4(6):478–85. doi: 10.1038/nri1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Yang Y, Torchinsky MB, Gobert M, Xiong H, Xu M, Linehan JL, et al. Focused specificity of intestinal TH17 cells towards commensal bacterial antigens. Nature. 2014 Jun 5;510(7503):152–6. doi: 10.1038/nature13279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Round JL, O'Connell RM, Mazmanian SK. Coordination of tolerogenic immune responses by the commensal microbiota. J Autoimmun. 2010 May;34(3):J220–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, Brodie EL, Shima T, Karaoz U, et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell. 2009 Oct 30;139(3):485–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, Imaoka A, Kuwahara T, Momose Y, et al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):337–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1198469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016 Apr 29;352(6285):539–44. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Ren B, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):382–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Michail S, Durbin M, Turner D, Griffiths AM, Mack DR, Hyams J, et al. Alterations in the gut microbiome of children with severe ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Oct;18(10):1799–808. doi: 10.1002/ibd.22860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Hill RJ, Brookes DSK, Davies PSW. Bones in pediatric Crohn's disease: A review of fracture risk in children and adults. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(5):1223–8. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Weiskopf D, Weinberger B, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. The aging of the immune system. Transpl Int. 2009;22(11):1041–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Montecino-Rodriguez E, Berent-Maoz B, Dorshkind K. Causes, consequences, and reversal of immune system aging. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):958–65. doi: 10.1172/JCI64096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Gruver AL, Hudson LL, Sempowski GD. Immunosenescence of ageing. J Pathol. 2007 Jan;211(2):144–56. doi: 10.1002/path.2104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Khosla S, Melton LJ, Riggs BL. The unitary model for estrogen deficiency and the pathogenesis of osteoporosis: Is a revision needed? J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(3):441–51. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Magrone T, Jirillo E. The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation. Immun Ageing. 2013;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-10-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Rosen CJ, Bouxsein ML. Mechanisms of disease: is osteoporosis the obesity of bone? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2(1):35–43. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Geiger H, de Haan G, Florian MC. The ageing haematopoietic stem cell compartment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 May;13(5):376–89. doi: 10.1038/nri3433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Linehan E, Fitzgerald DC. Ageing and the immune system: focus on macrophages. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2015;5(1):14–24. doi: 10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Miller JP, Allman D. The decline in B lymphopoiesis in aged mice reflects loss of very early B-lineage precursors. J Immunol. 2003;171(5):2326–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.5.2326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Min H, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K. Effects of aging on the common lymphoid progenitor to pro-B cell transition. J Immunol. 2006;176(2):1007–12. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Min H, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K. Reduction in the developmental potential of intrathymic T cell progenitors with age. J Immunol. 2004;173(1):245–50. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Tsuboi I, Morimoto K, Hirabayashi Y, Li GX, Aizawa S, Mori KJ, et al. Senescent B lymphopoiesis is balanced in suppressive homeostasis: decrease in interleukin-7 and transforming growth factor-beta levels in stromal cells of senescence-accelerated mice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229(6):494–502. doi: 10.1177/153537020422900607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Saffrey MJ. Aging of the mammalian gastrointestinal tract: A complex organ system. Age (Omaha) 2014;36(3):1019–32. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9603-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Fujihashi K, McGhee JR. Mucosal immunity and tolerance in the elderly. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125(12 SPEC.ISS.):889–98. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Ogino T, Miura S, Komoto S, Hara Y, Hokari R, Tsuzuki Y, et al. Senescence-associated decline of lymphocyte migration in gut-associated lymphoid tissues of rat small intestine. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125(3):191–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2003.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Schmucker DL, Owen RL, Outenreath R, Thoreux K. Basis for the Age-related Decline in Intestinal Mucosal Immunity. Clin Dev Immunol. 2003;10(2–4):167–72. doi: 10.1080/10446670310001642168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Santiago AF, Alves AC, Oliveira RP, Fernandes RM, Paula-Silva J, Assis FA, et al. Aging correlates with reduction in regulatory-type cytokines and T cells in the gut mucosa. Immunobiology. 2011 Oct;216(10):1085–93. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.McCabe LR, Irwin R, Schaefer L, Britton Ra. Probiotic use decreases intestinal inflammation and increases bone density in healthy male but not female mice. J Cell Physiol. 2013 Aug;228(8):1793–8. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Collins FL, Irwin R, Bierhalter H, Schepper J, Britton RA, Parameswaran N, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri 6475 Increases Bone Density in Intact Females Only under an Inflammatory Setting. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Cho I, Yamanishi S, Cox L, Methé Ba, Zavadil J, Li K, et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature. 2012;488(7413):621–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J, Alekseyenko AV, Leung JM, Cho I, et al. Altering the Intestinal Microbiota during a Critical Developmental Window Has Lasting Metabolic Consequences. Cell. 2014;158(4):705–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES