Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 20;372(21):2006–2017. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414428

Table 2.

Investigator-Assessed Confirmed Objective Response

BRAF Wild-Type BRAF V600 Mutant
Nivolumab + Ipilimumab Ipilimumab Nivolumab + Ipilimumab Ipilimumab
All randomized population, N 72 37 23 10
Best overall response, n (%)a
 Complete response 16 (22.2) 0 5 (21.7) 0
 Partial response 28 (38.9) 4 (10.8) 7 (30.4) 1 (10.0)
 Stable disease 9 (12.5) 13 (35.1) 3 (13.0) 1 (10.0)
 Progressive disease 10 (13.9) 15 (40.5) 5 (21.7) 7 (70.0)
 Unable to determine 9 (12.5) 5 (13.5) 3 (13.0) 1 (10.0)
Objective response rateb
 Number of responders (%) 44 (61.1) 4 (10.8) 12 (52.2) 1 (10.0)
 95% CI 48.9, 72.4 3.0, 25.4 30.6, 73.2 0.3, 44.5
 Estimate odds ratio (95% CI)c 12.96 (3.91, 54.49) 9.82 (0.99, 465.39)
 P value for comparison <0.001 NE
a

Assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1.

b

Complete response + partial response; CI based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

c

Ratio of nivolumab + ipilimumab over ipilimumab.

NE denotes not evaluated.