Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;37(10):1956–1966. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001434

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Peak cone density values for 18 subjects for whom cone density was measured over the follow-up period. Note the 2 clusters of subjects, one group of 4 subjects with peak density greater than 25,000 cones/mm2, and the remaining 14 subjects below that threshold. Subjects with densities lower than 25,000 cones/mm2 showed no significant change in their peak cone density value (P = 0.126). The group of higher density subjects was too small for statistical analysis.