Figure 3.
Self-reported ratings of distress were provided immediately following each block of videos while still in the scanner. In a group (HC vs SAD) by condition (Rejection vs. Neutral) ANOVA, there was a significant interaction (F(1,77)=4.584; p=.035), significant main effect of group (F(1,77)=17.986; p<.001), and significant main effect of condition (F(1,77)=89.679; p<.001), as well as simple main effects of higher distress for Rejection videos relative to Neutral videos within both groups (SAD: t(62)=12.470; p<.001; HC: t(15)=4.869; p<.001) and higher distress reported by SAD participants relative to HC participants for both Rejection (t(78)=4.312; p<.001) and Neutral videos (t(80.288)=4.234; p<.001). *p<.05 **p<.005 0=“Not at all,” 1=“Somewhat,” 2=“Moderately,” and 3=“Extremely.”