Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 1;23(9):2267–2276. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1421

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Chimeric Antigen Receptors Targeting CD70-Expressing Cancers

Qiong J Wang 1,*, Zhiya Yu 1, Ken-ichi Hanada 1, Krishna Patel 1, David Kleiner 1, Nicholas P Restifo 1, James C Yang 1,*
PMCID: PMC5411349  NIHMSID: NIHMS827161  PMID: 27803044

Abstract

Purpose

CD70 expression in normal tissues is restricted to activated lymphoid tissues. Targeting CD70 on CD70-expressing tumors could mediate “on-target, off-tumor” toxicity. This study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using anti-human CD70 CARs to treat cancer patients whose tumors express CD70.

Experimental Design

Seven anti-human CD70 CARs with binding moieties from human CD27 combined with CD3-zeta and different co-stimulatory domains from CD28 and/or 41BB were constructed. In vitro functionality of these receptors was compared and in vivo treatment efficacy was evaluated in a xenograft mouse model. A homologous, all murine anti-CD70 CAR model was also used to assess treatment-related toxicities.

Results

The CAR consisting of the extracellular binding portion of CD27 fused with 41BB and CD3-zeta (trCD27-41BB-zeta) conferred the highest IFN-γ production against CD70-expressing tumors in vitro, and NSG mice bearing established CD70-expressing human tumors could be cured by human lymphocytes transduced with this CAR. In the murine CD27-CD3-zeta CAR model, significant reduction of established tumors and prolonged survival were achieved using CAR-transduced splenocytes in a dose-dependent manner. Host pre-irradiation enhanced treatment efficacy but increased treatment-related toxicities such as transient weight loss and hematopoetic suppression. The treatment did not appear to block adaptive host immune responses.

Conclusions

Pre-clinical testing supports the safety and efficacy of a CD27-containing CAR targeting CD70-expressing tumors.

Keywords: CD70, Chimeric antigen receptor, renal cell cancer, hematologic malignancies, immunotherapy

Introduction

Cell-based immunotherapies have shown promising clinical outcomes in recent years. Adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) can achieve durable complete regression of metastatic melanoma (1). Alternatively, redirecting autologous T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or alpha-beta T cell receptors (TCRs) against tumor-associated antigens also mediated long-term durable remissions of late-stage cancers refractory to standard therapies (2-4). The advantage of CARs is that they can target antigens expressed on the cell surface without MHC restriction, therefore making them more widely applicable. However, treating solid cancers using CAR immunotherapies remains challenging due to the paucity of safe, clinically effective tumor-associated cell-surface antigens identified to date (5, 6).

CD70 was initially identified as the ligand for CD27, a co-stimulatory receptor involved in T cell proliferation and survival (7, 8). Studies on CD70 expression revealed the same restricted expression profile in both humans and mice (9, 10), with CD70 only found on a small percentage of activated T cells and antigen presenting cells in draining lymph nodes during viral infection (10). Interestingly, a number of human tumors can also express CD70 including solid cancers such as clear cell renal cancer (RCC), glioblastoma, and hematological malignancies (11-14). The mechanism of overexpression of CD70 on tumors remains unknown, but a recent study suggested the dysregulated pVHL/HIF pathway may be involved in RCC (15). Nonetheless, due to its restricted expression pattern on normal tissues and overexpression in cancers, CD70 may be an attractive therapeutic target. Approaches using antibody-drug conjugates directed against CD70 have shown some anti-tumor activity in vitro, and demonstrated some clinical responses against RCC and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a phase I clinical trial (13, 16). In addition, T cells genetically engineered with a CAR consisting of full-length CD27 coupled with the CD3-zeta signaling domain (CD3-zeta) has shown CD70-specific tumor recognition (17). These studies suggested that CD70 could be a potential immunotherapeutic target. However, due to CD70 expression by activated lymphoid tissues, the potential for “on-target, off-tumor” toxicity may hinder potential clinical applications, as has been observed when targeting CD19 on malignant and normal B-cells with a CAR (2, 18) . Therefore, in this study, we have compared the anti-tumor reactivities of anti-human CD70 CARs in which different portions of CD27 were fused with various co-stimulatory signaling domains from 41BB and/or CD28, and CD3-zeta, and established a murine model to test the potential for on-target, off-tumor toxicities. Our study demonstrates that anti-human and anti-murine CD70 CARs were effective in vitro and in vivo, respectively. However, some treatment-related toxicities were also observed, although they appeared to be reversible and tolerable in the murine model. Among the anti-human CD70 CAR constructs, CD27 without its intracellular signaling domain, fused with the co-stimulatory of 41BB and then CD3-zeta, designated as CD27-41BB-zeta, appeared to be most active in vitro. Therefore, plans are underway to test this anti-CD70 CAR in patients with advanced, refractory tumors expressing CD70.

Materials and methods

Mice, tumor lines and antibodies

C57BL/6J and NSG mice (Jackson Laboratory) were maintained per protocols in the NIH animal facility. Murine tumor lines B16 and B16/mCD70 (retrovirally transduced with murine CD70) were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies). All mouse studies were approved by the National Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.

Tumor lines from RCC patients were established and maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies) including 10% FBS, 10% tryptose phosphate (Sigma), 1x insulin-transferrin-selenium (Life Technologies) and 1 × serum pyruvate (Life Technologies). Melanoma tumor lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) with 10% FBS. All cell lines included in the study were generated at Surgery Branch, NCI, and tested and identities confirmed by HLA genotyping. The cell lines were maintained in the cell culture only when they were needed in the experiments and usually kept in culture for approximately a month, and mycoplasma testing were done routinely using mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza). The cell lines were reassessed for HLA and antigen expression by flow cytometry and co-culture assays when they were thawed for each experiment.

Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) including FITC-labeled anti-mouse CD3, anti-mouse CD45.1 and anti-human CD8 Abs, PE-labeled anti-mouse and anti-human CD70 Abs, PE-cy7-labeled anti-human CD3 Ab, APC-labeled anti-mouse CD27 Ab, APC-cy7-labeled anti-mouse CD8, and purified anti-mouse CD3 and anti-mouse CD28 Abs were purchased from BD Pharmingen. APC-labeled anti-human CD27 Ab was purchased from eBiosciences.

Construction of human anti-CD70 CARs, retroviral production, retroviral transduction of human PBL, and in vitro reactivity of transduced cells

Genes encoding seven human anti-CD70 CARs, including cDNAs for full-length CD27 (flCD27) or truncated CD27 (trCD27; including extracellular and transmembrane portions of CD27, aa1-211) fused with CD28 and/or 41BB signaling domains and CD3-zeta were constructed and cloned into the pMSGV1 plasmid (Fig. 1A). Retroviral production and transduction were the same as described previously (19). Briefly, 293gp cells were transfected with 9 μg of anti-CD70 CARs and 4.5μg of plasmid RD114 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies; 60μl). Two days later, the supernatants were harvested and used to transduce anti-CD3 stimulated PBL. PBL from allogeneic donors were stimulated with soluble OKT-3 (50ng/ml) and rhIL-2 (300 IU/ml) for 2 days before transduction was performed. The stimulated cells were added to 24-well plates initially coated with RetroNectin (Takara) and subsequently pre-coated with retrovirus by spinoculation (2000×g, 32°C, 2hrs) at 5 × 105/ml. The plates were then centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min, and incubated overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. This procedure was repeated the next day and cells were split as necessary to maintain cell density between 0.5 and 1 × 106 cells/ml. Transduction efficiency was estimated by analyzing human CD27 expression on retrovirally-transduced cells and comparing this to mock transduced T-cells. To test their reactivity, retrovirally-transduced cells (1 × 105) were co-cultured with 5 × 104 human tumor lines with or without CD70 expression at 37°C, 5% CO2 overnight. The supernatants were harvested and tested for IFN-γ secretion by ELISA (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The reactivity of anti-human CD70 CARs against CD70-expressing tumors in vitro. (A) Schematic of anti-human CD70 CAR constructs. Seven constructs were made using different portions of CD27 in combination with CD28 or 41BB costimulatory domain and CD3 zeta signaling domain. (B) Comparison of CD27 expression on T cells transduced with anti-human CD70 CARs. Allogeneic PBL were stimulated with anti-CD3 and retrovirally transduced with 7 anti-human CD70 CARs. 3 days after transduction, cells were labeled with anti-CD3-FITC and anti-CD27-APC MoAb, and analyzed on FACS CantoII. Data shown was gated on propidium iodide-negative cells. UT: untransduced controls. An arbitrary CD27 negative gate for untransduced cells was used to compare the transduction efficiency between different CARs. (C) Comparison of anti-tumor reactivity of T cells transduced with anti-human CD70 CARs. Allogeneic PBL were stimulated with anti-CD3 and retrovirally transduced with 7 anti-human CD70 CARs, respectively. 3 days after transduction, transduced T cells were co-cultured with a panel of tumor lines overnight, and tested for IFN-γ production by ELISA the next day.

Mouse xenograft studies

NSG mice were injected subcutaneously with 1.5×105 2654R human renal cancer cells. Eighteen days after inoculation, when tumors were approximately 5 mm in diameter, mice received 6 × 106 intravenous human T cells retrovirally transduced with anti-CD70 CARs or control T-cells, followed by intraperitoneal administration of 200,000 IU of rhIL-2 per day for 3 days. Each group included 5 randomly assigned tumor bearing mice, and all tumor measurements were performed by a blinded impartial observer.

Construction of murine anti-CD70 CAR, retroviral production, transduction of murine CD3 T cells, and in vitro functional analysis of transduced cells

cDNA encoding murine CD27 fused with murine CD3 zeta signaling domain (mCD27-zeta) was constructed in the pMSGV1 plasmid. To produce retrovirus, 293gp cells were transfected with 9 μg of pMSGV1-mCD27-zeta and 4.5μg of plasmid pCL-Eco (Addgene) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies; 60μl). Two days later, the supernatants were harvested and used to transduce activated mouse T cells. Splenocytes from C57BL/6J mice were harvested and CD3+ T cells were isolated by negative selection using a mouse pan T cell isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec). Murine CD3 T cells were then stimulated with plate-bound anti-mouse CD3 (1μg/ml), and soluble anti-mouse CD28 (1μg/ml) and rhIL-2 (30 IU/ml) for 2 days before transduction was performed. Transduction of simulated cells was performed similarly as described above by spinoculation. Transduction efficiency was determining by analyzing mouse CD27 expression on retrovirally-transduced T cells, compared to cells just stimulated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and rhIL-2. To assess the reactivity of mCD27-zeta, retrovirally-transduced murine T cells (1×105) were co-cultured with B16/mCD70 or B16 (5×104) at 37°C, 5% CO2 overnight and supernatant was harvested and tested for mouse IFN-γ secretion by ELISA (R&D systems).

Treatment efficacy of murine T cells retrovirally-transduced with murine anti-CD70 CAR in vivo

C57BL/6J mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c) with 0.5×106 B16 or B16/mCD70 tumors. Ten days after inoculation, when tumors were approximately 5 mm in diameter, mice received up to 107 intravenous (i.v) murine T cells retrovirally transduced with mCD27-zeta or stimulated, untransduced T-cells as a control, followed by intraperitoneal (i.p) administration of 200,000 IU of rhIL-2 per day for 3 days. Splenocytes from pmel-1 TCR transgenic mice, that are reactive to gp100 in both B16 and B16/mCD70 tumors, were activated in vitro in the presence of 1μM hgp10025-33 peptide and 30IU/ml rhIL-2 for 7 days. As a positive adoptive cell therapy control, a total of 106 activated pmel T cells were given to mice i.v. along with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding hgp100 (2× 107 pfu) and the regimen of i.p. rhIL-2 as above. Where specified, sub-lethal total body irradiation (TBI; 500 cGy) was given to mice immediately prior to cell transfer. Mice were given from 104 to 107 retrovirally-transduced murine T cells when assessing minimal effective treatment dosage. All treatment groups were randomly assigned and all tumor measurements were performed by a blinded impartial observer.

In vivo persistence of transferred T cells transduced with murine anti-CD70 CAR and assessment of treatment-related toxicity

T cells from Ly5.1 congenic mice were stimulated with plate-bound anti-murine CD3 and anti-mouse CD28 Abs for 2 days, and retrovirally-transduced with mCD27-zeta. 4 days after transduction, T cells (107) were injected i.v. to C57BL/6J mice, followed by i.p. administration of 200,000 IU of rhIL-2 per day for 3 days. Splenocytes were harvested from day 3 to day 12, and the presence of transferred cells was determined by expression of CD45.1-positive cells. Measurements of weight, absolute blood cell counts, blood chemistry, the number of splenocytes, serum cytokines were determined in both tumor-bearing and non-bearing mice.

Assessment of host immune responses after adoptive cell transfer

C57BL/6J mice were injected i.v. with murine T cells retrovirally-transduced with mCD27-zeta or untransduced control T-cells, followed by i.p. administration of 200,000 IU of rhIL-2 per day for 3 days. 32 days after transfer, mice were immunized with vaccinia virus encoding either OVA or gp100. Splenocytes from treated and control animals were harvested 7 days after immunization, and cultured in vitro in the presence of 1γM OVA257-264 or gp10025-33 peptides for 7 days, and then tested for IFN-γ production of by co-culturing T cells with LPS-stimulated lymphoblasts pulsed with either peptide.

Statistical analysis

Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare tumor slopes between each treatment groups, and log-rank test was used to analyze survival.

Results

The effectiveness of anti-human CD70 CAR in vitro and in vivo

Seven anti-human CD70 CAR retroviral vectors were constructed and transduced into anti-CD3 stimulated normal donor peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) to evaluate their expression and anti-tumor activities. As shown in Fig. 1A, full-length CD27 (flCD27) fused with CD3 zeta signaling domain (CD3-zeta) with or without CD28 and/or 41BB signaling domains were constructed, designated as flCD27-zeta, flCD27-CD28-zeta, flCD27-41BB-zeta and flCD27-CD28-41BB-zeta, as several studies demonstrated CD28 and 41BB signaling domains could augment anti-tumor reactivities and in vivo persistence (20-24). Similarly, three anti-human CD70 CARs using truncated CD27 (trCD27, aa 1-211; i.e. CD27 without its intracellular domain) were also constructed, shown as trCD27-CD28-zeta, trCD27-41BB-zeta, and trCD27-CD28-41BB-zeta. PBL retrovirally-transduced with each of the seven vectors showed various degrees of CD27 expression (Fig 1B). As might be expected, PBL successfully transduced with these CAR were devoid of CD3+CD70+ cells. flCD27-zeta appeared to be the best with ~92% of cells expressing CD27 in comparison with ~70% of CD27 expression on T cells transduced with trCD27-41BB-zeta, flCD27-41BB-zeta or flCD27-28-41BB-zeta (and 0.26% of stimulated but untransduced PBL). Since mock-transduced or untransduced T cells still expressed certain level of CD27, positivity of CD27 expression in these anti-CD70 CAR-expressed T cells was only counted when expression level was above the level of mock-transduced or untransduced T cells. This may lead to underestimate transduction efficiency of anti-CD70 CARs. Down-regulation of CD3 on these transduced T cells was also observed, and consistently seen with high transduction efficiency, suggesting that CD3 internalization may occur with introduced CD3 zeta chain signaling domain. Surprisingly, only 45%, 16% and 3% were CD27 positive when T cells were transduced with trCD27-28-zeta, trCD27-28-41BB-zeta and flCD27-28-zeta, respectively. To test antigen-dependent tumor recognition by these anti-human CD70 CARs, a panel of CD70-negative tumor lines (624mel and 938mel), and their stably transduced CD70 expressing counterparts (624/CD70 and 938/CD70), and RCC tumor lines naturally expressing high to low levels of CD70 (RCC HC, RCC RO, RCC DS, and RCC MW, respectively, Supplemental Fig. 1, and (25)) were included. All of the CARs, except for flCD27-28-zeta, demonstrated specific anti-CD70 reactivity, as they only recognized CD70-positive tumor lines, but not CD70-negative tumor lines (Fig.1C). The control vector did not show any reactivity against these tumors. Among the candidate CARs, trCD27-41BB-zeta appeared to possess the highest anti-tumor reactivity by IFN-γ production. In addition to flCD27-28-zeta, lower anti-CD70 reactivity was also observed in T cells transduced with trCD27-28-zeta, suggesting that signaling through CD28 may have adverse effects on these constructs. Based on transduction efficiency and anti-tumor reactivity of these CARs, we decided to compare the efficacy of flCD27-zeta and trCD27-41BB-zeta in vivo. The CD70 positive human renal tumor line, 2654R, was injected subcutaneously into NSG mice and once palpable, treated with human T cells transduced with either flCD27-zeta or trCD27-41BB-zeta. Curative effect was observed in both groups as shown in Fig. 2A and B. None of the control groups showed any delayed tumor growth. Our results suggest that either CAR could be effective in treating CD70-positive tumors in vivo. However, since normal tissues of NSG mice do not express human CD70, we could not assess the treatment-related toxicities using this model. Therefore, a mouse tumor model with tumors expressing murine CD70 was generated to address these issues.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Adoptive cell transfer of anti-human CD70 CAR-transduced cells treating human cancers in NSG mice. (A) The human renal tumor line, 2654R, was injected into NSG mice subcutaneously, and 6 ×106 T cells transduced with flCD27-zeta or trCD27-41BB-zeta were injected intravenously when tumors became palpable. Mice given no treatment, the same number of untransduced T cells (UT) or mock-transduced T cells served as controls. Serial tumor measurements were obtained and tumor area calculated. 5 mice were included in each group. Center Bar= Mean; Error Bars= SEM. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival in tumor-bearing mice receiving adoptive transferred T cells transduced with anti-human CD70 CARs versus controls (P<0.0001). 4 of 5 mice from each treatment groups are cured. “ACT” represents “adoptive cell transfer”.

Treatment Efficacy of murine anti-CD70 CAR

To generate a mouse model, an anti-murine CD70 CAR was constructed by fusing full-length murine CD27 with murine CD3-signaling domain (mCD27-zeta). Murine T cells expressed high levels of CD27 after retroviral transduction with the anti-murine CD70 CAR compared to mock-transduced or untransduced T-cells (Fig. 3A). Meanwhile, a stably transfected cell line, B16/mCD70, was generated by transducing B16 melanoma (a murine CD70 negative tumor line recognized by pmel T cells) (Fig. 3B) (26), with murine CD70. As shown in Fig. 3C, pmel T cells produced mouse IFN-γ when co-cultured with either parental B16 tumor, or B16/mCD70. However, mCD27-zeta could confer specific, anti-CD70 reactivity only against B16/mCD70. To test anti-tumor efficacy of mCD27-zeta in vivo, C57BL/6J mice were implanted with either B16 or B16/mCD70 subcutaneously, and then treated with mouse T cells retrovirally transduced with mCD27-zeta or other controls when tumors became palpable. While pmel T cells (given with concomitant vaccination and IL-2) could reduce tumor burdens in irradiated mice carrying either B16 or B16/mCD70, mCD27-zeta-transduced T cells (given only with IL-2) delayed tumor growth only in irradiated mice carrying B16/mCD70, in an antigen specific manner (Fig. 3D). Mice that were treated with untransduced T cells or left untreated did not show any delay of tumor growth. In addition, treatment efficacy was dose-dependent, with 1 ×105 the lowest effective T cell number in irradiated mice (Fig. 3E). In non-irradiated mice, however, treatment effects could only be observed when 1 × 107 cells were transferred. This may be attributable to superior persistence of transferred cells seen in irradiated mice compared to non-irradiated mice (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Furthermore, irradiated B16/mCD70-bearing mice treated with 1 ×105 to 1 ×107 CAR T-cells had significantly better survival than mice treated with no cells or 1 ×107 mock transduced T-cells (Fig. 3F). Although curative effects could be achieved in mice that were treated with high cell doses (1 of 5 given either 1 ×106 or 1× 107 cells), the majority of mice showed tumor growth inhibition rather than durable regressions. To delineate possible mechanisms of immune escape, we analyzed mCD70 expression on tumors progressing in treated mice (Fig. 3G). While tumors from control animals remained mCD70 positive, tumors from mCD27-zeta treated mice completely lacked mCD70 expression, implicating antigen loss as a cause of immune escape. While efficacy data were interesting, this mouse model was primarily developed to analyze the in vivo toxicity of using a CD27-zeta CAR to target CD70.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The effectiveness of an anti-murine CD70 CAR in treating murine CD70-expressing tumor. (A) Expression of CD27 in retrovirally-transduced murine T cells. Murine T cells were stimulated with anti-murine CD3 and CD28 Abs and retrovirally transduced with mCD27-zeta. Mock or untransduced murine T cells were included. 3 days after transduction, T cells were stained with anti-murine CD3-FITC and anti-murine CD27-APC and analyzed on FACS CantoII. An arbitrary CD27-negative gate of untransduced T cells were used to determine the percentage of CD27 expression. (B) Expression of murine CD70 in murine tumor lines. B16, a murine melanoma line; B16/mCD70, B16 tumor retrovirally transduced with murine CD70. (C) Reactivity of anti-murine CD70 CAR. Splenocytes were stimulated with anti-mouse CD3 and CD28, and transduced with anti-murine CD70 CAR (mCD27-zeta). 3 days after transduction, 1 ×105 transduced cells were co-cultured with 5×104 targets, and tested for mouse IFN-γ secretion. pmel T cells (from an anti-gp100 TCR transgenic mouse strain), untransduced and mock-transduced T-cells served as controls. (D) Treatment efficacy of anti-murine CD70 CAR in vivo. B16 or B16/mCD70 was injected s.c. into C57BL/6J mice and 500 cGy of whole body radiation followed by 1 × 107 murine T cells transduced with mCD27-zeta were injected i.v. 11 days after tumors were implanted. Mice given 1 × 106 pmel T cells along with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding hgp100 (rVVhgp100), 1 × 107 untransduced T cells, or no treatment served as controls. (E) Delayed tumor growth by anti-CD70 CAR was dose- and irradiation- dependent. B16/mCD70 was injected s.c. into C57BL/6J mice. 11 days later when tumors were palpable, mCD27-zeta transduced cells were adoptively transferred with or without whole body irradiation at doses from 1 × 104 to 1 × 107, again with PBS, 1 ×107 mock-transduced T-cells, or 1 ×106 pmel T cells with rVVhgp100 as controls. Serial tumor measurements were obtained and tumor area calculated. 5 mice were included in each group. Center Bar= Mean; Error Bars= SEM. (F) Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival in tumor-bearing mice receiving 1 × 104 to 1 ×107 T cells transduced with anti-murine CD70 CARs. Survival was significantly prolonged for mice receiving 1 x 105, 1 × 106, or 1 × 107 CAR T-cells compared to all control groups (p<0.001). (G) CD70 expression in tumors from mice with progressive disease after treatment. B16/mCD70 tumor bearing mice were treated as described. Twenty days after adoptive cell transfer, mice were sacrificed, tumors were taken from each group, labeled with anti-mouse CD70 MoAb and analyzed on FACS Canto II.

Short-term treatment-related toxicities of anti-murine CD70 CAR

To assess treatment-related toxicities, C57BL/6J mice were implanted with either B16 or B16/mCD70, treated with mCD27-zeta transduced or control T cells, and body weight evaluated as an indicator of systemic cytokine toxicity. Irradiated B16/mCD70 mice receiving mCD27-zeta-transduced T cells showed significant lower body weight than those receiving untransduced T cells, pmel T cells or left untreated from day 6 to day 10, but recovered 2 weeks after the cell transfer (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in non-irradiated recipients of T-cell transfers. Interestingly, lower body weight was also observed in irradiated, mCD27-zeta treated mice that were implanted with antigen-negative B16 tumors, which suggested that this transient toxicity results primarily from mCD27-zeta-transduced cells interacting with normal endogenous host cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Short-term impact of anti-murine CD70 CAR in murine model. (A) Body weight of mice treated with anti-murine CD70 CAR (mCD27-zeta). B16 or B16/mCD70 was injected s.c. into C57BL/6J mice, and 11 days after tumors were implanted, some groups were given 500 cGy of WBI or left untreated. Then 1 × 107 murine T cells transduced with mCD27-zeta or control T-cells were injected intravenously (B) – (D): Total white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts (B), IFN-γ secretion in mouse serum (C), and CD70 expression on splenocytes (D), from B16/mCD70 tumor bearing mice treated with anti-murine CD70 CAR. C57BL/6J mice, either exposed to 500 cGy or left untreated, were given 1 × 107 murine T cells transduced with mCD27-zeta or control T-cells.

To further define the toxicity of mCD27-zeta CAR cells independent of the effects of tumor growth, we conducted experiments in non-tumor bearing C57BL/6J mice. Body weight, peripheral white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts, splenocyte counts, blood chemistries, and serum cytokines were evaluated for two weeks after treatment. Similar to tumor bearing mice, irradiated mice that were treated with mCD27-zeta transduced T cells showed significant lower body weight at day 6 and 8 than those that were treated with mock-transduced or untransduced T cells, but recovered approximately 2 weeks after cell transfer (Supplementary Fig. 2B). This effect was not observed in non-irradiated mice. As would be predicted, whole body irradiation, with or without CAR T-cell transfer dramatically decreased absolute WBC and lymphocyte counts as well as splenocyte counts compared to all non-irradiated groups (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. 2C). Although blood chemistry did not show any differences among groups, we could detect IFN-γ in mouse serum from day 3 to day 5 only in irradiated mice that were treated with mCD27-zeta CAR T-cells (Fig. 4C). However, no differences could be detected in the very low levels of CD70 expression on splenocytes among these groups (Fig. 4D). Taken together, our data suggest that transient cytokine toxicity, as indicated by weight loss and elevated serum IFN-γ levels, could be detected in mice undergoing whole body irradiation followed by mCD27-zeta CAR T-cell transfer, and this resulted primarily from reactivity against endogenous host cells.

Immune competence of mice treated with anti-murine CD70 CAR

Since successfully targeting CD70 could impact on some T-cells and APCs, we tested immune responses in treated mice. One month after cell transfer, treated mice were immunized with vaccinia-OVA or vaccinia-gp100. Splenocytes from treated mice were stimulated and tested for reactivity against OVA or gp100 peptides. As shown in Fig. 5A, 7 days after in vitro stimulation with OT-I257-264, splenocytes from mice treated with mCD27-zeta or mock-transduced cells (with or without recipient pre-irradiation) were reactive to OT-I257-264. Similar results were observed with mice immunized with vaccinia-gp100 (Fig. 5B), as T cells from mice immunized with vaccinia-gp100 were reactive to gp10025-33, regardless which treatment the mice had received. Interestingly, T cells from mice given mCD27-zeta CAR T-cells with irradiation appeared to be more reactive than other groups. Nonetheless, our data show that mice treated with anti-murine CD70 CAR T-cells could still mount immune responses against exogenous antigens.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The immune competence of C57BL/6J mice treated with anti-murine CD70 CAR. Non-tumor bearing C57BL/6J mice, either exposed to 500 cGy or left untreated, were given 1 x 107 i.v. murine T cells retrovirally-transduced with mCD27-zeta or mock transduced. After 32 days, the mice were injected i.v. with vaccinia-OVA or vaccinia-gp100. Spleens were taken 7 days after immunization, and cultured with OVA257-264 or gp10025-33 peptides for one week, and tested for their reactivity against either peptide. (A) Reactivity of splenocytes from mice immunized with vaccinia-OVA against OVA257-264. (B) Reactivity of splenocytes from mice immunized with vaccina-gp100 against gp10025-33.

Discussion

We have demonstrated in this study that using CD27, the natural receptor which engages CD70, we could construct CARs to target CD70-expressing tumors. CD70 can be expressed on activated normal lymphocytes, but we did not encounter in vitro “fratricide” by CD27-zeta CAR expressing T-cells as an impediment to activating, transducing and expanding populations of reactive, CAR-transduced T-cells. We then compared 7 different anti-human CD70 CARs introduced in a replication-defective gamma-retrovirus for in vitro CD70-specific anti-tumor reactivity. These 7 CARs could all be categorized as 2nd generation CARs (flCD27-zeta, trCD27-28-zeta, and trCD27-41BB-zeta) or 3rd generation CARs (flCD27-28-zeta, flCD27-41BB-zeta, trCD27-28-41BB-zeta, and fCD27-28-41BB-zeta) given the costimulatory nature of the full length CD27 receptor. Significant differences were observed when different co-stimulatory signaling domains were included in the constructs. T cells transduced with receptors containing only the 41BB co-signaling domain, i.e. trCD27-41BB-zeta and flCD27-41BB-zeta, showed high transduction efficiency and anti-CD70 specific reactivity, while T cells including only a CD28 co-signaling domain, such as trCD27-28-zeta and flCD27-28-zeta, showed poor receptor expression and lower anti-CD70 reactivity. Interestingly, adding the 41BB signaling domain (constructs trCD27-28-41BB-zeta and flCD27-28-41BB-zeta compared to trCD27-28-zeta and flCD27-28-41BB-zeta, respectively) could partially compensate for the poor performance of CD28 alone in these constructs. Our findings coincide with a recent publication in which the authors demonstrate that 41BB co-stimulation reduces, but CD28 co-stimulation induces exhaustion of CAR-transduced T cells (27). Although the intracellular domain of CD27 may augment anti-tumor reactivity in vivo (28), including the full length CD27 receptor in the CAR did not reverse the deleterious effect of the CD28 costimulatory domain alone in our in vitro study. Overall, the 2nd generation construct, trCD27-41BB-zeta appeared to be the best among the constructs we tested in vitro. Comparing trCD27-41BB-zeta to flCD27-zeta in a xenograft experiments, both constructs showed similar curative effects against a naturally-expressing CD70+ tumor. Recent studies using CD19 CAR treating multiple hematologic malignancies have shown dramatic clinical responses (2, 3, 29), and the in vivo expansion of CAR-transduced T cells correlated with clinical responses (29). In fact, multiple pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the 41BB co-stimulatory domain can enhance in vivo persistence and survival of CAR-transduced T cells (21, 24). A recent study further suggests that 41BB promotes the growth of central memory T cells with enhanced fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial biogenesis (30). Therefore, we have chosen trCD27-41BB-zeta for our future clinical studies.

One of the biggest drawbacks with T cells targeting overexpressing tumor antigens is the “on-target” toxicity against normal tissues (2, 31-34). The severity of these treatment-related toxicities is largely dependent on which normal tissues express the targeted antigen. T-cells engineered with an anti-CD19 CAR, for instance, can effectively treat late-stage cancer patients with CD19+ B-cell malignancies. However, it can also cause a transient acute cytokine release syndrome as well as long-term eradication of normal CD19+ B cells in some patients (2, 35). These effects can be managed medically in nearly all patients, and are considered tolerable in view of the efficacy of this cell transfer. Thus, analysis of antigen expression patterns and toxicity in an appropriate all-murine model can be valuable when vetting a potential tumor-associated antigen targeted by adoptive T-cell therapy. Similar to previous studies, we could only detect CD70 expression on a very small subpopulation of human peripheral blood cells, and murine lymphoid tissues, such as splenocytes, lymph nodes, bone marrow and peripheral blood. An all murine model targeting mCD70 with a CAR using the mCD27 binding domain could elucidate the in vivo consequences of depleting this subpopulation of normal lymphocytes and possibly reveal other unsuspected CD70 expression on normal tissues, but further strict quantitative translation of toxicities may not be possible when homologous receptor components and host species also have to be changed. Therefore, for our in vivo murine toxicity studies, we used a basic CD27-zeta CAR that not only depleted CD70 expressing immune cells, but also had demonstrated efficacy against tumor. Using this therapeutically effective anti-murine CD70 CAR, we demonstrated that acute toxicities such as weight loss and low lymphocyte counts occurred in the irradiated treatment group at the highest cell doses but resolved within 2 weeks after cell transfer. In addition, low levels of serum IFN-γ could be detected in the irradiated treatment group during the first week after cell transfer. Our data suggest endogenous CD70-expressing cells may induce these short-term, self-limited toxicities. Analyses of blood chemistry and sequential histological studies of multiple tissues also did not show any consistent differences associated with the transfer of these CAR T-cells. Moreover, the immune competence of the treated mice appeared to remain intact, since they could respond normally to immunization using vaccinia virus encoding OVA or gp100. This would imply that CD70 expression is not an obligate step in T cell activation or APC function. Any impact on this small normal population of immune cells appears similar and analogous to that seen when clinically targeting the normal B-cell antigen CD19 with CAR T-cells. No unacceptable toxicities were encountered in this preclinical evaluation of an anti-CD70 CAR using CD27 as the binding domain. The potential for additional toxicities with more complex receptor structures always exists, but this will be best addressed by careful phase I dose-escalation trials. Such a clinical trial (NCT02830724) with escalating cell doses of CAR-transduced autologous PBL in patients with late stage CD70+ cancers is underway.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Translational Relevance.

CD70 has been identified as a biomarker for clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) as well as several hematological malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In this study, we first evaluated the in vitro function of anti-human CD70 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) constructs by fusing different portions of CD27 with CD3-zeta in combination with co-stimulatory signaling domains such as CD28 and/or 41BB. Among them, the extracellular binding portion of CD27 fused with 41BB and CD3-zeta appeared to be the best against CD70-expressing tumors, and curative effects and long-term survival were observed when CAR-expressing T cells were adoptively transferred to tumor-bearing NSG mice. We then tested in vivo toxicity and efficacy using a homologous, completely murine model. This showed only transient cytokine toxicity at cell doses 100 fold higher than needed to show efficacy. A phase I/II clinical trial using the anti-human CD70-41BB-CD3zeta CAR against RCC and other CD70-expressing tumors is underway.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Drs. Steven A Rosenberg and Paul Robbins for thoughtful discussions.

Financial support: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Hughes MS, Phan GQ, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17:4550–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Feldman SA, Wilson WH, Spaner DE, Maric I, et al. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood. 2012;119:2709–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;371:1507–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Robbins PF, Kassim SH, Tran TL, Crystal JS, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2015;21:1019–27. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chinnasamy D, Yu Z, Theoret MR, Zhao Y, Shrimali RK, Morgan RA, et al. Gene therapy using genetically modified lymphocytes targeting VEGFR-2 inhibits the growth of vascularized syngenic tumors in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010;120:3953–68. doi: 10.1172/JCI43490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnson LA, Scholler J, Ohkuri T, Kosaka A, Patel PR, McGettigan SE, et al. Rational development and characterization of humanized anti-EGFR variant III chimeric antigen receptor T cells for glioblastoma. Science translational medicine. 2015;7:275ra22. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hintzen RQ, Lens SM, Lammers K, Kuiper H, Beckmann MP, van Lier RA. Engagement of CD27 with its ligand CD70 provides a second signal for T cell activation. Journal of immunology. 1995;154:2612–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hendriks J, Gravestein LA, Tesselaar K, van Lier RA, Schumacher TN, Borst J. CD27 is required for generation and long-term maintenance of T cell immunity. Nature immunology. 2000;1:433–40. doi: 10.1038/80877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hintzen RQ, Lens SM, Koopman G, Pals ST, Spits H, van Lier RA. CD70 represents the human ligand for CD27. International immunology. 1994;6:477–80. doi: 10.1093/intimm/6.3.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tesselaar K, Xiao Y, Arens R, van Schijndel GM, Schuurhuis DH, Mebius RE, et al. Expression of the murine CD27 ligand CD70 in vitro and in vivo. Journal of immunology. 2003;170:33–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wischhusen J, Jung G, Radovanovic I, Beier C, Steinbach JP, Rimner A, et al. Identification of CD70-mediated apoptosis of immune effector cells as a novel immune escape pathway of human glioblastoma. Cancer research. 2002;62:2592–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Diegmann J, Junker K, Gerstmayer B, Bosio A, Hindermann W, Rosenhahn J, et al. Identification of CD70 as a diagnostic biomarker for clear cell renal cell carcinoma by gene expression profiling, real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. European journal of cancer. 2005;41:1794–801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McEarchern JA, Smith LM, McDonagh CF, Klussman K, Gordon KA, Morris-Tilden CA, et al. Preclinical characterization of SGN-70, a humanized antibody directed against CD70. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2008;14:7763–72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobs J, Deschoolmeester V, Zwaenepoel K, Rolfo C, Silence K, Rottey S, et al. CD70: An emerging target in cancer immunotherapy. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2015;155:10. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruf M, Mittmann C, Nowicka AM, Hartmann A, Hermanns T, Poyet C, et al. pVHL/HIF-regulated CD70 expression is associated with infiltration of CD27+ lymphocytes and increased serum levels of soluble CD27 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2015;21:889–98. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tannir NM, Forero-Torres A, Ramchandren R, Pal SK, Ansell SM, Infante JR, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of SGN-75 in patients with CD70-positive relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Investigational new drugs. 2014;32:1246–57. doi: 10.1007/s10637-014-0151-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shaffer DR, Savoldo B, Yi Z, Chow KK, Kakarla S, Spencer DM, et al. T cells redirected against CD70 for the immunotherapy of CD70-positive malignancies. Blood. 2011;117:4304–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K, et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science translational medicine. 2014;6:224ra25. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang QJ, Hanada K, Feldman SA, Zhao Y, Inozume T, Yang JC. Development of a genetically-modified novel T-cell receptor for adoptive cell transfer against renal cell carcinoma. Journal of immunological methods. 2011;366:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kowolik CM, Topp MS, Gonzalez S, Pfeiffer T, Olivares S, Gonzalez N, et al. CD28 costimulation provided through a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor enhances in vivo persistence and antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred T cells. Cancer research. 2006;66:10995–1004. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Milone MC, Fish JD, Carpenito C, Carroll RG, Binder GK, Teachey D, et al. Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2009;17:1453–64. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhong XS, Matsushita M, Plotkin J, Riviere I, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptors combining 4-1BB and CD28 signaling domains augment PI3kinase/AKT/Bcl-XL activation and CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor eradication. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2010;18:413–20. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Savoldo B, Ramos CA, Liu E, Mims MP, Keating MJ, Carrum G, et al. CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in lymphoma patients. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121:1822–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI46110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Song DG, Ye Q, Carpenito C, Poussin M, Wang LP, Ji C, et al. In vivo persistence, tumor localization, and antitumor activity of CAR-engineered T cells is enhanced by costimulatory signaling through CD137 (4-1BB). Cancer research. 2011;71:4617–27. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang QJ, Hanada K, Robbins PF, Li YF, Yang JC. Distinctive features of the differentiated phenotype and infiltration of tumor-reactive lymphocytes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer research. 2012;72:6119–29. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Overwijk WW, Theoret MR, Finkelstein SE, Surman DR, de Jong LA, Vyth-Dreese FA, et al. Tumor regression and autoimmunity after reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CD8+ T cells. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2003;198:569–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Long AH, Haso WM, Shern JF, Wanhainen KM, Murgai M, Ingaramo M, et al. 4-1BB costimulation ameliorates T cell exhaustion induced by tonic signaling of chimeric antigen receptors. Nature medicine. 2015;21:581–90. doi: 10.1038/nm.3838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Song DG, Ye Q, Poussin M, Harms GM, Figini M, Powell DJ., Jr. CD27 costimulation augments the survival and antitumor activity of redirected human T cells in vivo. Blood. 2012;119:696–706. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Porter DL, Hwang WT, Frey NV, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Loren AW, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells persist and induce sustained remissions in relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Science translational medicine. 2015;7:303ra139. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kawalekar OU, O'Connor RS, Fraietta JA, Guo L, McGettigan SE, Posey AD, Jr., et al. Distinct Signaling of Coreceptors Regulates Specific Metabolism Pathways and Impacts Memory Development in CAR T Cells. Immunity. 2016;44:380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Cassard L, Yang JC, Hughes MS, et al. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood. 2009;114:535–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2010;18:843–51. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Parkhurst MR, Yang JC, Langan RC, Dudley ME, Nathan DA, Feldman SA, et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2011;19:620–6. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Morgan RA, Chinnasamy N, Abate-Daga D, Gros A, Robbins PF, Zheng Z, et al. Cancer regression and neurological toxicity following anti-MAGE-A3 TCR gene therapy. Journal of immunotherapy. 2013;36:133–51. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182829903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kochenderfer JN, Rosenberg SA. Treating B-cell cancer with T cells expressing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors. Nature reviews Clinical oncology. 2013;10:267–76. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES