Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2016 Nov 30;135(5):449–459. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022385

Discovery and validation of agonistic angiotensin receptor autoantibodies as biomarkers of adverse outcomes

Peter M Abadir 1,2, Alka Jain 1, Laura J Powell 1, Qian-Li Xue 1,2, Jing Tian 3, Robert G Hamilton 4, David A Bennett 5, Thomas Finucane 1, Jeremy D Walston 1,2, Neal S Fedarko 1,2
PMCID: PMC5285272  NIHMSID: NIHMS835129  PMID: 27903588

Abstract

Background

Agonistic angiotensin II type I receptor autoantibodies (AT1RaAbs) have not been associated with functional measures or risk for adverse health outcomes. AT1RaAbs could be utilized to stratify patient risk and to identify patients who can benefit from angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment.

Methods

Demographic and physiologic covariates were measured in a discovery set of community dwelling adults from Baltimore (N=255) and AT1RaAb associations with physical function tests and outcomes assessed. A group from Chicago (N=60) was used for validation of associations and to explore the impact of ARB treatment.

Results

The Baltimore group had 28 subjects with falls, 32 frail subjects and 5 deaths. Higher AT1RaAbs correlated significantly with interleukin-6 (Spearman r = 0.33, P < 0.0001), systolic BP (Spearman r = 0.28, P < 0.0001), body mass index (Spearman r = 0.28, P < 0.0001), weaker grip strength (Spearman r = −0.34, P < 0.01), and slower walking speed (Spearman r = −0.30, P < 0.05). Individuals with high AT1RaAbs were 3.9 (95% CI 1.38–11.0) times more likely to be at high risk after adjusting for age (P<0.05).Every 1 µg/ml increase in AT1RaAbs increased the odds of falling 30% after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and BP. TThe Chicago groupgroup had 46 subjects with falls and 60 deaths.. Serum AT1RaAb levels were significantly correlated with grip strength (Spearman r = −0.57, P < 0.005), walking speed (Spearman r = −0.47, P< 0.005) and falls (Spearman r = 0.30, P < 0.05). Every 1 µg/ml increase in AT1RaAbs, decreased time to death by 9% after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and BP. Chronic treatment with ARBs was associated with better control of systolic BP and attenuation of decline in both grip strength and time to death.

Conclusions

In older individuals, higher AT1RaAb levels were associated with inflammation, hypertension and adverse outcomes. ARB treatment may blunt the harm associated with high levels of AT1RaAb.

Keywords: Aging, angiotensin, autoantibodies, receptor blockers, inflammation, mortality

INTRODUCTION

The Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) has been identified in subcellular organelles such as the nucleus and mitochondria, in organisms without a pressurized vasculature, and in virtually every human organ system.1, 2 An independently regulated RAS in human monocytes has been identified.3 Beyond its classic role in homeostatic regulation of blood pressure and fluid balance, the RAS has been implicated in tissue remodeling and wound repair.4 Binding of Angiotensin II, the main effector hormone, to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) increases the production of inflammatory molecules and regulates multiple steps in the inflammatory process.5 Inappropriate activation of the RAS may contribute to chronic inflammation, but how this occurs is not fully understood.

Autoantibodies that react with the AT1R (AT1RaAbs) and increase expression and function of the receptor in an apparent positive feedback loop have been identified in pre-eclampsia6 and have been linked to transplant rejection and malignant hypertension.7, 8 A pro-inflammatory cascade, initiated by AT1RaAbs, has been proposed which involves antibody binding, signal transduction through ERK1/2, an increase in reactive oxygen species, NADPH oxidase expression, and nuclear factor-kappa B (NFκB) activation.9 Activation of this pro-inflammatory pathway has been suggested as a potential mechanism for endothelial damage observed in persons with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.10, 11

A frailty phenotype, assessed using a validated clinical tool, identifies older adults who are particularly vulnerable to a host of adverse health outcomes including falls, functional decline, disability, cardiovascular events and early mortality. Substantial evidence supports associations between this phenotype and markers of chronic inflammation (neutrophil, monocyte and total white blood cell counts and IL-6 levels).12 How inflammatory activation is sustained remains poorly defined, but multiple chronic disease states, redox imbalance, senescent cells, and increased body fat have been suggested.13, 14

We hypothesized that levels of AT1RaAb would be associated with increased inflammation, deficits in functional measures (grip strength and walking speed) and negative outcomes (increased frailty and falls). This hypothesis was tested in a primary population of community dwelling individuals (the Baltimore group). A secondary group (the Chicago group) was employed to validate associations between AT1RaAb levels and functional measures and outcomes observed in the Baltimore group. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) provide cardiovascular protection, in part through their vascular and anti-inflammatory effects 15. Whether ARB treatment can modify the associations between AT1RaAb and functional measures and/or outcomes is unkown. The Chicago group, half of whom were ARB-treated, was also used to explore how ARB treatment impacts AT1RaAb associations.

METHODS

Study design and participants

Two hundred and fifty-five, community dwelling adults, age 20–93 years, living in the Baltimore, Maryland area were recruited with the goal of developing a discovery set with an age range of eight decades. Exclusion criteria included angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, estrogen replacement therapy, corticosteroids, methotrexate, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other immune modulating agents. Based on the distribution of AT1RaAbs, subjects were divided into two groups: adult (age 20 – 69 years, n = 168) and older adult (>70 years, n = 87). A uniform structured clinical evaluation was performed on each older adult participant to identify low risk and high risk individuals. At-risk status was assessed using a commonly utilized and well-validated frailty phenotype screening tool which consists of grip strength and walking speed measurements, as well as weight loss, fatigue, and physical activity questions.16 To replicate our findings from the Baltimore group, convenience samples were obtained from the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project, longitudinal clinical-pathologic studies of chronic conditions of old age.17, 18 In these studies, participants age 70–90 years were recruited from residential facilities across the metropolitan Chicago area, including subsidized senior housing facilities, retirement communities, and retirement homes, in addition to social service agencies and church groups. Study subjects were enrolled with informed consent and the study protocols had appropriate approval by the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutional Review Board (for the Baltimore group) and Rush University Institutional Review Board (for the Chicago group).

Chicago participants underwent annual detailed clinical evaluations and were followed until death. The Chicago group did not have at risk status assessed on subjects using the complete Fried criteria for frailty. Subjects did, however, have grip strength and walking speed measured. The number of samples needed from the Chicago group were assessed by performing a sample size calculation using the observed mean functional measures (grip strength and walking speed) above and below the assessed optimal AT1RaAb serum level cut off value in the Baltimore population, the standard deviation of those measures, and an 80% power to detect the relevant difference between means at a significance of 0.05. For grip strength, a mean difference of 11 kg, an observed standard deviation of 12, yielded a sample size of 20. For walking speed, a mean difference of 0.31 m/s, a standard deviation of 0.41, yielded a sample size of 30 per group. The larger sample size was used. The convenience samples were from baseline and one half of the samples were from subjects treated with ARBs. To minimize confounding between ARB exposed and unexposed groups, serum samples were selected from subjects who were individually matched. A subject who did not receive ARBs was matched to a subject who received ARBs by age (± 2 years), gender, ethnicity, BMI (± 2kg/m2), and blood pressure (± 10 mm Hg). All samples in the validation set were from subjects with confirmed deaths. Data collected on subjects from both groups included demographic (age, gender, ethnicity), physiologic (BMI, blood pressure, comorbid conditions, medications), functional (grip strength and walking speed), and outcome (falls and mortality) measures. All data are cross sectional except for the falls and mortality data.

Procedures

Blood collection visits were scheduled in the morning. Blood was drawn from each individual participant into serum separator tubes which were inverted five times, allowed to clot for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 1,100xg for 15 minutes in a fixed angle rotor. Serum aliquots were then transferred to cryovials and stored at −80 until the immunoassays were performed. The number of freeze thaws cycles was limited to ≤ 3. A quantitative antigen-down capture ELISA was developed in-house to measure AT1RaAb in serum samples (see below). Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) was assayed using a quantitative sandwich ELISA (Mesoscale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Performance characteristics of the cytokine immunoassay included a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 0.09 pg/ml, and a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.30 pg/ml.

A quantitative AT1RaAb ELISA was developed using purified capture antigen, AFHYESQ, which was coated at 100 ng/well in 0.2 M sodium carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.4, overnight at 4 C. Wells were blocked with Neptune blocking reagent (ImmunoChemistry Technologies, Bloomington, MN, USA). Serum from subjects was diluted 1:200, serum and antibody dilutions were made in Tris buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 10% Neptune blocking reagent. Each subject had duplicate aliquots on coated and uncoated wells, thus the assay measures both specific and non-specific binding for each subject. Additional wells (half antigen coated and half uncoated) were reacted with serial dilutions of an affinity purified, goat anti-rabbit anti-FHYESQ IgG antibody (Biorbyt LLC, Berkeley, CA, USA) to generate a standard curve. A 1:2,000 dilution of a secondary goat anti-human IgG detection antibody conjugated to HRP was used in conjunction with 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbezidine substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

For interpolating the values of unknowns, standards of the anti-FHYESQ IgG antibody serially diluted from 133 ng/ml and linear regression were used. Samples with calculated values above the highest standard were further diluted and reanalyzed in the ELISA. Additionally, if the coefficient of variance (CV) of unknown sample replicates exceeded 15%, the sample was also reanalyzed. The CV among sample replicates ranged between 5 and 15%, with higher CVs clustering at the low end of the curve. Three serum samples, with AT1RaAb levels of 20.2, 10.0 and 4.9 µg/ml, were analyzed in triplicate and the CVs were assessed to be 12%, 9.4%, and 14.6%, respectively. Assay parameters including the LLOD and LLOQ were assessed following methodology proposed by the International Council for Harmonization.19 A LLOD of 2.5 ng/ml was calculated using the formula LLOD = 3.3σ/S, where σ is the standard deviation of the y-intercept of the regression line and S is average slope of nine standard curves, while a LLOQ of 7.4 ng/ml was calculated using the formula LLOQ = 10σ/S.

Three complementary methods were used to determine the presence, identity and specificity of AT1RaAbs in serum. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to detect binding of serum components to an antigenic peptide as described.20 Briefly, the antigen, AFHYESQ, was covalently attached via amine coupling to sensor chip CM5, perfused in 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.005% surfactant P20, pH 7.4, and reacted with 1:100 or 1:1,000 dilutions of serum from an 81 year old female serum donor. In-between injections, the chip was regenerated with 10 mM glycine-HCl pH 1.5. The identity of serum antibodies was assessed by western blot analysis. The serum from an 81 year old female donor diluted 1:500 was tested for immunoreactivity against extracts from three human-derived cell lines that were known to express AT1R (PC-3, DU145 and LnCAP) as well as a cell line, PC12W, that did not express AT1R.21, 22 The molecular mass of the immunoreactive bands was assessed following 4 to 20% gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of 50 µg/well of cell lysate, transferring resolved proteins to a nitrocellulose membrane, using the serum to probe the membrane and detecting bound antibodies by a goat-antihuman IgG conjugated to horse radish peroxidase as described.23 Finally, the ability of soluble antigen to compete for binding with serum antibodies was tested using a competition assay. Serum from the same 81 year old female donor, diluted 1:200, was pre-incubated with varying concentrations of AFHYESQ for 30 minutes at room temperature prior to transfer to AT1RaAb ELISA microtiter wells. The ELISA was then processed as described above to quantify the levels of autoantibodies binding to the capture antigen coated wells.

Statistical Analysis

Nonparametric analyses were used because the distribution of serum levels of AT1RaAb failed the D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test. Comparisons of AT1RaAb values between groups were by Mann-Whitney U-test. Multiple comparisons of AT1RaAb values among three or more groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used for predicting at-risk status and identifying the optimal cut off value of AT1RaAb based on the Youden’s J statistic. Pairwise correlations between AT1RaAb and clinical correlates or functional outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between AT1RaAb levels and high risk and in the Baltimore group and falls in the Baltimore and Chicago groups. Multivariable-adjusted random effects models were used to assess the association of AT1RaAb levels with continuous measures (grip strength and walking speed). The association of AT1RaAb levels with mortality was assessed by regression of the natural logarithm of time to death as a function of AT1RaAbs. Modeling log survival time was chosen because it is a special case of the accelerated failure model without censoring because all subjects from the validation sample died; therefore time to death was known for everyone in the study and the parameters of the model can be validly estimated via a conventional linear regression approach. The regression analyses were split by ARB treatment to assess the effect of ARBs on AT1RaAb associations with functional measures and outcomes. The statistical software employed was SAS version 9.2 and a P ≤ 0.05 was taken as supporting rejection of the null hypothesis.

RESULTS

The epitope of AT1RaAbs has been localized to the sequence AFHYESQ in the extracellular loop 2 region (Figure 1A).24 The binding of serum components to AFHYESQ was investigated by surface plasmon resonance where the peptide was immobilized on the chip surface and different dilutions of human serum were injected in the mobile phase. Sensorgrams exhibiting the classic association and dissociation phases of a binding interaction were seen in each plot (Figure 1B). The same serum sample was used to probe a Western blot of SDS PAGE resolved cell lysates from cell lines either known to express or not express AT1R. The major immunoreactive band exhibited a Mr of 43 kDa similar to AT1R while the negative control revealed no immunoreactive bands (Figure 1C). To quantify the levels of AT1RaAb in serum, an antigen capture ELISA was developed. The assay used a rabbit anti-FHYESQ IgG antibody as a standard and conditions which gave a reproducible linearity up to 133 ng/ml (Figure 1D). The peptide AFHYESQ was able to block the binding of serum autoantibodies to microtiter wells, yielding a dose dependent reduction in levels of AT1RaAb measured by the ELISA in competition assays (Figure 1E).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Detection and specificity of autoantibodies against angiotensin II type 1 receptor. (A) Epitopes of autoantibodies against AT1R map to a 9 amino acid segment of the second extracellular loop. (B) Human serum from an 81 year old female were diluted 1:100 or 1:1,000 and analyzed by surface plasmon resonance for binding to AFHYESQ. (C) Western blot of lysates from 4 different cell lines that were probed with a 1:500 dilution of the same prostate cancer subject’s serum. PC12W (lane 2) does not express AT1R, while PC3 (lane 3), DU145 (lane 4) and LNCaP (lane 5) are prostate cancer cell lines that do express AT1R. Lane 1 contains molecular weight standards. (D) The mean and standard deviation of nine standard curves from the AT1RaAb ELISA derived from the absorbance at 450 nm of antigen coated minus uncoated wells (C-U A450nm) versus the anti-FHYESQ IgG antibody standard. (E) The specificity of the developed AT1RaAb ELISA was tested by performing a competition assay. Serum from three different older adults was diluted 1:200, mixed with different concentrations (10, 5, 2.5 1.25 and 0 µg/ml) of an antigen peptide (AFHYESQ) and added to AT1RaAb ELISA wells pre-coated with 100 ng/well of antigen.

Demographic and clinical variables of the discovery and validation groups are presented in Table 1. For both groups, individuals over 70 years of age were more likely to be female and had increased values for systolic blood pressure, number of comorbidities, BMI and IL-6. For the Baltimore group, Serum levels of AT1RaAb exhibited a median value of 4.47 (range 0.31 – 20.3) µg/ml and a varied scatter when analyzed as a function of age (Figure 2 A). When AT1RaAb values were grouped by decade of life, there was no significant change in median values until after age 70 (Figure 2 B). A Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test assessed that AT1RaAb levels from subjects in their 70s and 80s were significantly higher then those in earlier decades, P < 0.0001. To further investigate this jump in AT1RaAb levels in adults over the age of 70, this group (“older adult”) was further segregated using the Fried frailty criteria to distinguish between low risk and high risk individuals. High risk older adults had higher median levels, 9.0 (range 2.8 – 20.3) µg/ml, of serum AT1RaAb as compared to either the adult or low risk older adults, 3.8 (range 0.3 – 18.5) µg/ml and 6.0 (range 1.6 – 17) µg/ml, respectively (Figure 2 C).

Table 1.

Characteristics, main predictors and outcomes of discovery and validation groups.

Model Covariates Discovery Set Validation Set
All
(N=255)
Adult
(N=168)
Older Adult
(N=87)
Older Adult
(N=60)
Age at visit, mean (SD), y 53 ± 21 47 ± 14 75 ± 13 84 ± 7
Female (%) 140 (55) 96 (57%) 44 (66) 50 (83)
Systolic BP, mean (SD), mm Hg 119 (16) 113 (6) 131 (24) 129 (20)
Diastolic BP, mean (SD), mm Hg 73 (9) 73 (4) 71 (11) 73 (11)
No. comorbidities, mean (SD) 0.3 (0.3) 0 0.8 (0.9) 1.3 (1.3)
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 24.6 ± 5.3 22.0 ± 1.3 28.0 ± 6.8 25.5 ± 4.4
IL-6, median (range), pg/ml 0.79 (0.10–9.03) 0.67 (0.10–3.25) 1.17 (0.49–9.03) 1.33 (0.08–14.4)
Main predictors
AT1RaAb, median (range), µg/ml 4.47 (0.31–20.3) 3.76 (0.31–18.5) 7.3 (1.5–20.3) 6.9 (0.15–55.8)
ARBs, No. (%) 0 0 0 30 (50)
Outcomes
Grip Strength, mean (SD), kg - NA 26 ± 12 16 ± 5.7
Walking speed, mean (SD), m/s - NA 0.94 ± 0.41 0.61 ± 0.21
High risk, frail (%) - 32 (37) N.D.*
Falls, incidence (%) - 0 28 (32) 46 (77)
Falls, total # - 0 55 101
Deaths (%) 5 (2) 0 5 (6) 60 (100)
*

N.D., The Chicago group did not have at-risk status determined using the complete Fried frailty criteria on study participants.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

AT1RaAb distribution and physiologic measure in the Baltimore population. (A) Serum levels of AT1RaAb assessed by antigen capture ELISA were plotted as a function of individual donor age and gender (circle, female; square, male). (B) AT1RaAb levels graphed by grouping in decades. (C) Serum levels of AT1RaAb in participants were segregated by age and risk status: adult, older adult low risk, older adult high risk. Serum levels of IL-6 (D), and measures of BMI (E), systolic (F) and diastolic (G) blood pressure in participants were segregated by risk status. Data points represent mean values of duplicate measures in each subject. Bar represents median value. Groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

ROC curve analysis for detecting high risk versus low risk status in older adults yielded an area under the curve of 0.76 ± 0.05 and, at a cut-off value of 8.2 µg/ml, a specificity of 80% (95% CI 69 – 88) and sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 41 – 78). Based on the ROC curve analysis, on average the high risk (frail) individuals will be correctly classified as such 76% of the time using the 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb cutoff. Logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals with AT1RaAb levels above 8.2 µg/ml were 3.9 (95% CI 1.38 – 11.0) times more likely to be at high risk after adjusting for age (P < 0.05). When analyzed in pre-specified age groups, individuals aged 70 – 75, with AT1RaAb ≥ 8.2 were 4.88 (95% CI 1.50 – 18.86) times more likely to be at high risk (P < 0.01) compared with those with AT1RaAb < 8.2 µg/ml. Among individuals who are older than 75 years of age, those with AT1RaAb ≥ 8.2 µg/ml were 9.0 (95% CI 1.3 – 63.8) times more likely to be at high risk compared with those with AT1RaAb < 8.2 µg/ml (P < 0.05).

To further characterize the differences between the adult and low and high risk older adult groups, the distribution of IL-6, BMI and blood pressure were analyzed (Figure 2 D–G). Individuals over the age of 70 exhibited significantly elevated IL-6, BMI and systolic BP compared with adults below the age of 70. High risk individuals had higher levels of serum IL-6 with a median value of 1.7 (range 0.7 – 9.0) pg/ml versus 1.1 (range 0.5 – 3.2) pg/ml for low risk subjects, P < 0.01. High risk older adults also had significantly higher median BMI values when compared to low risk older adults. The association between AT1RaAb and IL-6, BMI and BP was investigated (Figure 3). Across all three groups (adults and older adults at low or high risk) there was a strong positive correlation between AT1RaAb and IL-6 (Spearman r = 0.33, P < 0.0001). Serum levels of AT1RaAb were significantly associated with higher BMI (Spearman r = 0.36, P < 0.0001) and systolic BP (Spearman r = 0.28, P < 0.0001). In the Baltimore group, the serum levels of AT1RaAb were also statistically significantly correlated with a history of heart disease (Spearman r = 0.26, P < 0.0005).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Association of serum levels of AT1RaAb with IL-6, BMI, and blood pressure in the Baltimore population. AT1RaAb levels were plotted as a function of (A) IL-6 and (B) BMI and (C) systolic BP. Data points represent mean values of individuals. The pair-wise association between AT1RaAb and IL-6, BMI and BP was analyzed by Spearman correlation.

Older adult high risk status has been strongly associated with weaker grip strength and decline in walking speed as well as increased falls and mortality.16, 25 The association between AT1RaAb levels and functional measures and outcomes was investigated in low and high risk older adults from the primary population in Baltimore (Figure 4 A – C). The level of AT1RaAbs correlated negatively with grip strength (Spearman r = −0.34, P < 0.01), walking speed (Spearman r = −0.30, P < 0.05), and positively with number of falls in older adults (Spearman r = 0.40, P < 0.005). The mean grip strength was 30 ± 12 kg for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels and 19 ± 7.7 kg for subjects with higher AT1RaAb levels (P = 0.0005 by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction). The mean walking speed was 1.07 ± 0.40 m/s for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels and 0.76 ± 0.33 m/s for subjects with ≥ 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels (P < 0.005 by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

AT1RaAb level association with grip strength, walking speed and number of falls, in the discovery and validation groups. Participant’s grip strength (A and D), walking speed (B and E) and number of falls (C and F) in older adults from the Baltimore (A, B and C) and Chicago (D, E and F) groups were plotted as a function of AT1RaAb. Data points represent mean values for individual older adults (diamond). The association of functional outcomes with AT1RaAbs was assessed by Spearman correlation.

The number of subjects who had 1 or more falls was 12 and 16 , respectively, for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml or ≥ 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb. The mean number of falls per subject was 0.80 ± 1.1 for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels and 1.70 ± 1.80 for subjects with ≥ 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels (P < 0.05 by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction). Logistic regression of falls as a function of AT1RaAb levels yielded an odds ratio of 1.25 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.47) unadjusted, 1.28 ( 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47) for age adjusted and 1.33 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.66) for age, gender, BMI and BP adjusted models. For every 1 µg/ml change in AT1RaAb levels, the odds of falling increased approximately 30%. Mortality was too low (6%) in the Baltimore group to enable modeling of the association between time to death and serum AT1RaAb levels.

For the Chicago group, samples from 60 subjects, half treated with ARBs, had their associated demographic and physiologic covariates, physical function tests, health outcomes, and AT1RaAb levels analyzed. The Chicago group had a higher average age, proportion of females, number of comorbidities, and reduced grip strength and walking speed compared with the Baltimore group (Table 1). Treatment with ARBs was associated with better control of systolic blood pressure in patients with high AT1RaAb as compared to patients with low AT1RaAb (128 ± 21 versus 148 ± 17 mm Hg, P < 0.05). Association similar to those seen in the Baltimore group were observed in the Chicago group for grip strength (Spearman r = −0.57, P < 0.005), walking speed (Spearman r = −0.47, P< 0.005) and falls (Spearman r = 0.30, P < 0.05) (Figure 4 D – F). Comparing functional measures by the AT1RaAb cutoff (< 8.2 versus ≥ 8.2 µg/ml) yielded 18 ± 4.5 versus 12 ± 5.8 kg for grip strength (P < 0.005 by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction) and 0.66 ± 0.22 versus 0.48 ± 0.14 m/s for walking speed (P < 0.05 by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. The number of subjects who had 1 or more falls was 21 and 25 , respectively, for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml or ≥ 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb. The mean number of falls per subject was 1.5 ± 1.2 for subjects with < 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels and 1.8 ± 1.6 for subjects with ≥ 8.2 µg/ml AT1RaAb levels (not significantly different). Logistic regression of falls in the Chicago group as a function of AT1RaAb levels yielded an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.69) though any adjustments made the association no longer significant.

These observations of an association between generalized weakness (slower walking speed and weaker grip strength) and higher AT1RaAb levels led to an investigation of the impact of AT1RaAbs on outcomes in the Chicago group. Regression analysis of the natural logarithm of time to death in the Chicago group yielded an unadjusted βAT1RaAb of −0.097 (95% CI −0.150 to −0.044) with P < 0.005. Adjusting for age, gender and BMI did not significantly alter the association as βAT1RaAb was −0.096 (95% CI −0.255 to −0.036) with P < 0.01. For every 1 µg/ml increase in AT1RaAbs, the time to death decreased by 9% after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and BP.

The associations of AT1RaAbs with functional and outcome measures in older individuals may by modified by ARB treatment since ARBs may compete with AT1RaAbs for receptor occupancy. Multiple-adjusted models were used to explore the effect of ARB treatment on the association between AT1RaAbs and functional measures and outcomes. Among older adults not receiving ARBs, there was an average 2.6 (95% CI 0.52 – 4.68) kg decrease in grip strength for every 1 µg/ml increase in AT1RaAb level after adjusting for age. Multiple adjustments including gender, comorbidities, IL-6 and BMI, in addition to age did not affect the association in older adults who did not receive ARBs - a decrease of 2.8 kg (95% CI 0.67 – 4.93) for every 1µg/ml increase in AT1RaAb, P <0.01. This relationship was not significant in older individuals receiving ARB treatment after age or other adjustments. The data is consistent with ARB treatment attenuating the negative effects of AT1RaAb on grip strength. The association between AT1RaAb levels and the natural logarithm of time to death was analyzed by multiple regression and split by ARB treatment and adjusted for age, gender, BMI and BP. A βAT1RaAb of −0.097 (95% CI −0.0158 to −0.036) and P < 0.0001 was assessed for subjects not receiving ARBS, while a βAT1RaAb of 0.024 (95% CI −0.057 to 0.106) and P = 0.53 was obtained for those who were treated with ARBs. Consistent with the grip strength data, ARB treatment attenuated the association between time to death and AT1RaAb levels. These observations were unlikely to be caused by demographic or clinical differences between those on ARBs and not on ARBs as the characteristics of Chicago group segregated by ARBs treatment, with the exception of thyroid disease, were similar (Table 2).

Table 2.

Characteristics of secondary population segregated by ARB use.

No ARB Tx* (n=30) ARB Tx (n=30) P-value†
Age, mean (SD) 82.9 (8.4) 85.7 (4.0) 0.10
Gender, Male (%) 22 (585) 18 (72) 0.32
BMI, kg/m2 mean (SD) 24.9 (4.4) 26.2 (4.5) 0.32
Walking speed, m/s mean (SD) 0.64 (0.24) 0.59 (0.17) 0.44
Grip Strength, kg mean (SD) 15.2 (6.8) 16.4 (4.9) 0.61
Diabetes (%) 3 (10) 6 (20) 0.47
Thyroid (%) 5 (17) 12 (40) 0.045
Heart Disease (%) 7 (23) 7 (23) 1.0
Stroke (%) 6 (20) 8 (27) 0.54
Claudication (%) 5 (17) 7 (23) 0.52
Kidney disease (%) 4 (13) 9 (30) 0.21
IL-6, median pg/ml (range) 1.25 (0.08–4.69) 1.36 (0.32–14.4) 0.33
AT1RaAb, µg/ml IgG
        Mean (SD) 9.8 (10.7) 8.1 (8.8)
        Median (range) 6.8 (0.2–56) 7.0(0.6–45) 0.53‡
# of disease, mean (SD) 1.0 (1.1) 1.6 (1.5) 0.063
*

Treatment.

†

Comparison by student’s t-test.

‡

Comparison by Mann Whitney U test.

Elevated serum levels of AT1RaAbs have been clinically associated with pre-eclampsia.9, 23, 24 The potential impact of past pregnancies and history of preeclampsia as factors that could alter AT1RaAb levels in our two groups (Chicago and Baltimore) was investigated. Participants enrolled in the Chicago group were recruited as part of the Chicago Religious Order Study. Women enrolled in this study were nuns with no reported history of pregnancy and/or children. Participants from the Baltimore population were surveyed for pregnancy history. There was no reported pre-eclampsia in female Baltimore participants, which was not surprising, given that the prevalence of pre-eclampsia is around 3% of all pregnancies in the U.S.26 Furthermore, adjusting for past pregnancy history did not alter associations between AT1RaAb levels and functional measures. This was also supported by the observation that adjusting for gender did not change the association of AT1RaAb with the outcomes reported.

DISCUSSION

In two distinct groups higher serum AT1RaAb levels were strongly associated with worse blood pressure control, worse functional measures and higher rates of falls and death.

To date the relationship between RAS activation and lifespan remains unclear.27 RAS blockade in some animal studies results in a 25% extension of lifespan 28 as well as improved physical performance.29 However, the response to RAS blockade has varied widely in human studies of variable design.30 Our data suggest thatARB treatment may modulate associations between AT1RaAb levels and physical performance measures and mortality. If these associations are is confirmed, studies of RAS blockers might target individuals with high levels of these autoantibodies.

The correlation between IL-6, systolic BP, and serum AT1RaAb is in agreement with previous research documenting the role of inflammation in the development of hypertension and with a role for AT1RaAb as a pro-hypertensive autoantibody.31, 32 It is not clear whether AT1RaAbs are specific disease-causing agents, or if their levels reflect age-related global dysregulation of autoantibody production. Autoantibodies in general are capable of stimulating receptors and causing disease, such as Graves’ disease 33 and dilated cardiomyopathy.34 In our study we observed an association between serum level of AT1RaAb and: the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 which has been linked to frailty; 35, 36 functional measures associated with risk status (walking speed and grip strength); and poor outcomes (falls, death). The correlation coefficients for these associations were significant, though the percent of variance in the outcome measure accounted for might be considered small, ranging from 9 to 32%. Grip strength, walking speed and falls are complex traits and correlations in the range of what we report are considered biologically significant.37, 38 For example, the In Chianti study of inflammatory biomarkers and physical performance in 1020 participants aged 65 years and older found that CRP, IL-6, and IL1RA were significantly correlated with physical performance (Spearman r = −0.162, r = −0.251, and r = −0.127, respectively) and walking speed (Spearman r = −0.143, r = −0.254, r = −0.133, respectively). A similar correlation (r = 0.20) was seen in a study of myostatin and grip strength and a biological linkage between myostatin and the outcome is evident.39 Differences in serum levels of these autoantibodies may explain some of the variability in results of studies of RAS blockade for improving muscle strength and physical performance in older individuals.7

Our exploratory data indicate that the use of ARBs attenuated the association between levels of AT1RaAb and decline in grip strength and time to death. Hints of this effect may be gleaned from previous reports documenting that ARBs may retard the decline in muscle strength and physical activity in older hypertensive persons.40 Our data suggests that this effect may have been partially explained by the presence of AT1RaAb in these older adults. Analysis of the effect of ARB treatment on the association between autoantibody levels and number of falls yielded wide confidence intervals to the odds ratio that lost significance with any adjustment. The increased incidence of falls and serious injuries with the use of ARBs has been previously reported 41 and this may have confounded our analysis. It may also be that the limited number of samples in the Chicago group negatively impacted the power of the analysis.

The present study and reports on the effects of AT1RaAb on cytokines, reactive oxygen species and endothelial dysfunction, 9–11 extends a line of evidence suggesting that elevated serum levels of AT1RaAb may have contributed to the precipitation and progression of physical decline in those older individuals at high risk for negative health outcomes (increased falls and mortality) and may do so via specific pro-inflammatory effects. Further, patients with high levels of antibodies that stimulate AT1R may be more likely to benefit from ARB treatment that blocks AT1R. The limitations to this study include a relatively small validation group sample size that, while yielding statistical significance in our primary outcomes, impeded robust analyses of ARB effects on falls and mortality by subgroups. Perhaps more importantly, the study is designed to ascertain associations, not causality. Larger studies are required to fine tune the utilization of AT1RaAb as a screening tool and large intervention trials are needed to guide selection of individuals that might benefit most from RAS blockade.

In summary, the association of risk status with serum levels of AT1RaAb provides one plausible biological pathway for RAS-mediated chronic inflammation and subsequent disease progression that can be probed for therapeutic intervention. ARB treatment was associated with a blunting of the harm seen in patients with high levels of agonistic autoantibodies to AT1R.

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE.

What is New?

  • A quantitative immunoassay for measuring agonistic angiotensin AT1 receptor autoantibody (AT1RaAb) levels in serum was developed.

  • Operating characteristics were assessed in a discovery group (N = 255) and validated in a second group (N = 60).

  • AT1RaAb levels significantly associated with higher levels of inflammatory cytokines, weaker grip strength, slower walking speed, risk for frailty, more falls and increased mortality.

  • Chronic treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) attenuated the AT1RaAb association with decline in grip strength, and increased mortality.

  • This study is the first to examine associations between serum AT1RaAbs with demographic, physiological and functional covariates and outcomes.

What are the clinical implications?

  • Chronic inflammation commonly accompanies frailty and increases risk of cardiovascular events and death in older patients.

  • Stimulatory AT1RaAbs may increase inflammatory burden potentially accelerating disease progression.

  • Follow-up studies in intervention trials in serious diseases whose underlying pathology involves chronic inflammation could test whether these AT1RaAb levels can be used to stratify patient risk across a broad spectrum of disorders and whether they may identify patients who can benefit from ARB treatment and those that would benefit from other treatment modalities.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Johns Hopkins University Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Clinical Research Core Laboratory for the performance of IL-6 measures.

Funding Source:

This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Defense W81XWH-11-1-0239 (to Dr. Fedarko), NIH grants 1R01CA149273 (to Dr. Fedarko), K23 AG035005 (to Dr. Abadir), the Johns Hopkins Older Americans Independence Center National Institute on Aging Grant P30 AG021334 (to Dr. Walston) and the Nathan W. and Margaret T. Shock Aging Research Foundation (to Dr. Abadir). The project described was also supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, through Grant UL1 TR 001079. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Defense or NIH.

Footnotes

Author contributions: Drs. Abadir and Fedarko participated in study concept and design. Dr. Bennett provided the subset of samples from the Chicago group. Drs. Jain, Hamilton and Ms. Powell were responsible for the acquisition of data. Dr. Xue and Ms. Tian provided statistical support. Drs. Abadir, Jain, Hamilton and Fedarko participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data. Drs. Abadir, Jain, Xue, Hamilton, Bennett, Finucane, Walston, Fedarko and Ms. Powell and Ms. Tian participated in drafting the manuscript and approved the final version. Drs. Abadir, Xue, Finucane, and Fedarko were responsible for the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approval of the final version. Drs. Abadir and Fedarko had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Disclosures:

The authors Peter Abadir, Neal Fedarko, Alka Jain, and Jeremy Walston have filed an international patent (PCT) application involving wound healing, topical angiotensin receptor blocker treatment and using AT1RaAb serum levels to stratify individuals for ARB therapy. Other then this, the authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Written permission has been obtained from all persons named in the contribution section.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abadir PM, Walston JD, Carey RM. Subcellular characteristics of functional intracellular renin-angiotensin systems. Peptides. 2012;38:437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gwathmey TM, Alzayadneh EM, Pendergrass KD, Chappell MC. Novel roles of nuclear angiotensin receptors and signaling mechanisms. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012;302:R518–R530. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00525.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas DW, Hoffman MD. Identification of macrophage receptors for angiotensin: a potential role in antigen uptake for T lymphocyte responses? J Immunol. 1984;132:2807–2812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weber KT. Fibrosis, a common pathway to organ failure: angiotensin II and tissue repair. Semin Nephrol. 1997;17:467–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Suzuki Y, Ruiz-Ortega M, Lorenzo O, Ruperez M, Esteban V, Egido J. Inflammation and angiotensin II. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;35:881–900. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wallukat G, Homuth V, Fischer T, Lindschau C, Horstkamp B, Jupner A, Baur E, Nissen E, Vetter K, Neichel D, Dudenhausen JW, Haller H, Luft FC. Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:945–952. doi: 10.1172/JCI4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dragun D, Muller DN, Brasen JH, Fritsche L, Nieminen-Kelha M, Dechend R, Kintscher U, Rudolph B, Hoebeke J, Eckert D, Mazak I, Plehm R, Schonemann C, Unger T, Budde K, Neumayer HH, Luft FC, Wallukat G. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating antibodies in renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:558–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fu ML, Herlitz H, Schulze W, Wallukat G, Micke P, Eftekhari P, Sjogren KG, Hjalmarson A, Muller-Esterl W, Hoebeke J. Autoantibodies against the angiotensin receptor (AT1) in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2000;18:945–953. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018070-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dechend R, Muller DN, Wallukat G, Homuth V, Krause M, Dudenhausen J, Luft FC. Activating auto-antibodies against the AT1 receptor in preeclampsia. Autoimmun Rev. 2005;4:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brewer J, Liu R, Lu Y, Scott J, Wallace K, Wallukat G, Moseley J, Herse F, Dechend R, Martin JN, Jr, Lamarca B. Endothelin-1, oxidative stress, and endogenous angiotensin II: mechanisms of angiotensin II type I receptor autoantibody-enhanced renal and blood pressure response during pregnancy. Hypertension. 2013;62:886–892. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dechend R, Dragun D, Herse F, riemekasten G, Schulze-Forster K, Muller D. Activating autoantibodies against the AT1-receptor in vascular disease. Transplantationsmedizin. 2012;24:20–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ershler WB, Keller ET. Age-associated increased interleukin-6 gene expression, late-life diseases, and frailty. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:245–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chung HY, Sung B, Jung KJ, Zou Y, Yu BP. The molecular inflammatory process in aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:572–581. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ren JL, Pan JS, Lu YP, Sun P, Han J. Inflammatory signaling and cellular senescence. Cell Signal. 2009;21:378–383. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Navalkar S, Parthasarathy S, Santanam N, Khan BV. Irbesartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibitor, regulates markers of inflammation in patients with premature atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:440–444. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01138-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the religious orders study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:628–645. doi: 10.2174/156720512801322573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Buchman AS, Barnes LL, Boyle PA, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the rush Memory and Aging Project. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:646–663. doi: 10.2174/156720512801322663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Topic Q2 (R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. International Council for Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Published in the US FDA Federal Register. 1997;62:27463–27467. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ladd J, Lu H, Taylor AD, Goodell V, Disis ML, Jiang S. Direct detection of carcinoembryonic antigen autoantibodies in clinical human serum samples using a surface plasmon resonance sensor. ColloidsSurf B, Biointerfaces. 2009;70:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abadir PM, Walston JD, Carey RM, Siragy HM. Angiotensin II Type-2 receptors modulate inflammation through signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins 3 phosphorylation and TNFalpha production. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31:471–474. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chow L, Rezmann L, Catt KJ, Louis WJ, Frauman AG, Nahmias C, Louis SN. Role of the renin-angiotensin system in prostate cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;302:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wallukat G, Homuth V, Fischer T, Lindschau C, Horstkamp B, Jupner A, Baur E, Nissen E, Vetter K, Neichel D, Dudenhausen JW, Haller H, Luft FC. Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:945–952. doi: 10.1172/JCI4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wallukat G, Neichel D, Nissen E, Homuth V, Luft FC. Agonistic autoantibodies directed against the angiotensin II AT1 receptor in patients with preeclampsia. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003;81:79–83. doi: 10.1139/y02-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Walston J, Fried LP. Frailty and the older man. Med Clin North Am. 1999;83:1173–1194. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980–2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abadir PM. The frail renin-angiotensin system. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Benigni A, Corna D, Zoja C, Sonzogni A, Latini R, Salio M, Conti S, Rottoli D, Longaretti L, Cassis P, Morigi M, Coffman TM, Remuzzi G. Disruption of the Ang II type 1 receptor promotes longevity in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:524–530. doi: 10.1172/JCI36703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Burks TN, Andres-Mateos E, Marx R, Mejias R, Van Erp C, Simmers JL, Walston JD, Ward CW, Cohn RD. Losartan restores skeletal muscle remodeling and protects against disuse atrophy in sarcopenia. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:82ra37. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang P, Fedoruk MN, Rupert JL. Keeping pace with ACE: are ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists potential doping agents? Sports Med. 2008;38:1065–1079. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838120-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chamarthi B, Williams GH, Ricchiuti V, Srikumar N, Hopkins PN, Luther JM, Jeunemaitre X, Thomas A. Inflammation and hypertension: the interplay of interleukin-6, dietary sodium, and the renin-angiotensin system in humans. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:1143–1148. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Walther T, Stepan H. Agonist autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor in renal and hypertensive disorders. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007;9:128–132. doi: 10.1007/s11906-007-0023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chardes T, Chapal N, Bresson D, Bes C, Giudicelli V, Lefranc MP, Peraldi-Roux S. The human anti-thyroid peroxidase autoantibody repertoire in Graves’ and Hashimoto’s autoimmune thyroid diseases. Immunogenetics. 2002;54:141–157. doi: 10.1007/s00251-002-0453-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wallukat G, Muller J, Hetzer R. Specific removal of beta1-adrenergic autoantibodies from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1806. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200211283472220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Leng SX, Xue QL, Tian J, Walston JD, Fried LP. Inflammation and frailty in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:864–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Walston J, McBurnie MA, Newman A, Tracy RP, Kop WJ, Hirsch CH, Gottdiener J, Fried LP. Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2333–2341. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.20.2333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cesari M, Penninx BW, Pahor M, Lauretani F, Corsi AM, Rhys Williams G, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Inflammatory markers and physical performance in older persons: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:242–248. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.m242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patel HP, Al-Shanti N, Davies LC, Barton SJ, Grounds MD, Tellam RL, Stewart CE, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Lean mass, muscle strength and gene expression in community dwelling older men: findings from the Hertfordshire Sarcopenia Study (HSS) Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;95:308–316. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9894-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bergen HR, 3rd, Farr JN, Vanderboom PM, Atkinson EJ, White TA, Singh RJ, Khosla S, LeBrasseur NK. Myostatin as a mediator of sarcopenia versus homeostatic regulator of muscle mass: insights using a new mass spectrometry-based assay. Skelet Muscle. 2015;5:21. doi: 10.1186/s13395-015-0047-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Augusto G, Pego M, Neves SM, Providencia LA. P-231: Angiotensin receptors blockers and muscle strength in older hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:117A–117A. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tinetti ME, Han L, Lee DS, McAvay GJ, Peduzzi P, Gross CP, Zhou B, Lin H. Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:588–595. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES