Abstract
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a crucial energy sensor and plays a key role in integration of cellular functions to maintain homeostasis. Despite this, it is largely unknown whether targeting the AMPK pathway can be used as a therapeutic strategy for infectious diseases. Herein, we show that AMPK activation robustly induces antibacterial autophagy, which contributes to antimicrobial defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). AMPK activation led to inhibition of Mtb-induced phosphorylation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (MTOR) in macrophages. In addition, AMPK activation increased the genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial ATP production, and biogenesis in Mtb-infected macrophages. Notably, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, coactivator 1α (PPARGC1A) was required for AMPK-mediated antimicrobial activity, as well as enhancement of mitochondrial function and biogenesis, in macrophages. Further, the AMPK-PPARGC1A pathway was involved in the upregulation of multiple autophagy-related genes via CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), β (CEBPB). PPARGC1A knockdown inhibited the AMPK-mediated induction of autophagy and impaired the fusion of phagosomes with MAP1LC3B (LC3B) autophagosomes in Mtb-infected macrophages. The link between autophagy, mitochondrial function, and antimicrobial activity was further demonstrated by studying LysMCre-mediated knockout of atg7, demonstrating mitochondrial ultrastructural defects and dysfunction, as well as blockade of antimicrobial activity against mycobacteria. Collectively, our results identify the AMPK-PPARGC1A axis as contributing to autophagy activation leading to an antimicrobial response, as a novel host defense mechanism.
Keywords: AICAR, AMP-activated protein kinase, autophagy, MTOR, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, PPARGC1A
Introduction
Autophagy is an important biological pathway for lysosomal self-digestion of cytosolic constituents including damaged organelles, protein aggregates, and intracellular pathogens.1,2 It is now clear that the autophagy pathway is associated with innate immune responses, facilitates pathogen detection, and activates immune functions, thus contributing to pathogen clearance and antibacterial defense during infection.1,2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is a successful human pathogen that resides in the phagosomal environment to inhibit fusion with lysosomes, thus arresting the maturation of phagosomes.3 Induction of autophagy appears to be a powerful mechanism that inhibits survival of intracellular Mtb through overriding the inhibition of phagosomal maturation.4,5 The interest in autophagy biology and signaling has increased; however, it remains incompletely understood whether targeting or modulating autophagy can be used as a new therapeutic strategy for treating infectious diseases.6
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a major energy-sensing serine/threonine kinase involved in a variety of catabolic processes, such as glucose uptake and metabolism, thereby maintaining energy balance.7,8 AMPK signaling is activated by metabolic stress or ATP consumption, thus globally promoting catabolic processes and energy production while simultaneously suppressing anabolic pathways, such as lipid and protein biosynthesis.9 Recent studies have demonstrated a role for AMPK signaling in the autophagy process, a catabolic pathway of cytoplasmic materials and organelles, whereas MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) is reported to have converse effects.10-12 The complex protein network comprising AMPK, MTOR, and ULK1/2 (unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1/2) is considered to be important for coordinating autophagic responses during a variety of cell stress conditions.12 In addition to autophagy activation, AMPK signaling is critically involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and activation. AMPK functions in the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of PPARGC1 (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1) family consisting of PPARGC1A, PPARGC1B, and PPRC1/PRC, which plays a key role in the transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis and respiratory function.13 Although previous studies have clearly suggested the importance of the AMPK-PPARGC1A axis in the metabolic control of mitochondrial function and exercise physiology,13-15 the role of AMPK-PPARGC1A in innate immunity is not well understood. Here, we investigate a novel function of AMPK activation in promoting antimicrobial host defense through PPARGC1A-mediated activation of autophagy and phagosomal maturation.
Results
AMPK activation by AICAR treatment enhances autophagy, leading to phagosomal maturation and antimicrobial response against mycobacterial infection
To identify a potential antimicrobial agent against intracellular Mtb based on autophagy activation, we first examined several AMPK-activating agents that enhanced antibacterial autophagy and antimicrobial responses (data not shown). In our search for autophagy-activating agents through AMPK activation, we found that the AMP-mimetic 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR)16,17 robustly activated autophagy in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), as determined by immunoblotting of autophagosomal membrane-associated LC3-II fractions (Fig. S1A). In addition, AICAR treatment upregulated the lipidated form of LC3, but downregulated the autophagy substrate SQSTM1/p62, in uninfected and in Mtb-infected BMDMs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). Flow cytometric analysis using anti-LC3B-specific antibody11 showed a significant increase in autophagosome formation in AICAR-treated, Mtb-infected BMDMs (Fig. 1B). It was noted that AICAR-induced LC3B and LC3 puncta formation was greatly increased in Mtb-infected BMDMs, when compared with the uninfected condition (Fig. 1B; Fig. S1B).
Figure 1. AICAR-induced autophagy activation leads to phagosomal maturation and antimicrobial responses against mycobacterial infection. (A and B) BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h, incubated with or without AICAR (0.1, 0.5, 1 mM for A, 0.5 mM for B) for 16 h. (A) Cells were harvested, followed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-LC3, anti-SQSTM1, and anti-ACTIN. (B) Cells were fixed and immunolabeled with the anti-LC3B antibody, followed by staining with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. The expression of LC3B was analyzed by flow cytometry. (Left) A representative histograms of 7 independent replicates. (Right) Average mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs). (C and D) BMDMs were infected with ERFP-Mtb (MOI = 10) for 4 h, incubated with or without AICAR for 24 h, then fixed and stained with αLC3 (Alexa 488) to detect autophagosomes and DAPI. (C) Confocal z-stack images were obtained and reconstituted to 3 dimensions using the Imaris software for Mtb-infected/AICAR-treated conditions. Insets, enlargement of outlined areas. Scale bars: 5 μm. See also the corresponding Video 1. (D) Quantitative data of colocalization analyses (%). Colocalization analyses between the autophagosomal marker LC3 (green) and the bacterial phagosome containing ERFP-Mtb (red). See also the corresponding Video 1. (E) BMDMs were infected with Mtb, treated with AICAR, and visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Scale bar: 1 µm. Magnified view of corresponding boxed areas in the right panels (scale bar: 200 nm). (Left) Representative TEM images from 3 independent experiments. (Right) Quantification of 200 internalized mycobacteria per experimental condition (mean ± SD). (F–H) Intracellular survival of Mtb assessed by CFU assay. (F) BMDMs were infected with Mtb for 4 h, and then incubated with AICAR for 3 d. (G) BMDMs were infected with Mtb, followed by treatment with 3-MA (10 μM; 2 h), wortmannin (100 nM), chloroquine (10 μM), or bafilomycin A1 (100 nM), and then incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 3 d. (H) THP-1 cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing nonspecific shRNA (sh-NS) or shRNA specific for BECN1 (sh-BECN1), ATG5 (sh-ATG5), ATG7 (sh-ATG7) with polybrene (8 μg/mL). After 3 d, THP-1 cells were infected with Mtb, treated with AICAR, and then lysed to determine intracellular bacterial loads. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), are indicated. All data above represent the means ± SD from 3 experiments. SC, solvent control. CFU, colony-forming units.
We next monitored autophagic flux in macrophages using different assays.18 The formation of endogenous LC3 punctate structures was significantly abrogated by pretreatment with 3-methyladenine (3-MA), an inhibitor of autophagy (Fig. S1B), and increased by the vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitor, bafilomycin A1 (Fig. S1B). Additionally, pretreatment of BMDMs with bafilomycin A1 or chloroquine markedly increased AICAR-induced LC3-II fractions and accumulation of SQSTM1 in macrophages (Fig. S1A). Moreover, the long-lived protein degradation assay showed that the AICAR-induced proteolysis rate of long-lived proteins was increased in BMDMs in a time-dependent manner, and was suppressed by bafilomycin A1 or chloroquine, both inhibitors of lysosomal acidification (Fig. S1C). We further measured mRFP-GFP-LC3 delivery to lysosomes in AICAR-treated cells. As shown in Figure S1D, both yellow and red puncta were increased in AICAR-treated BMDMs; however, only yellow puncta increased upon pretreatment of the cells with bafilomycin A1, suggesting that autophagosome maturation into autolysosomes was blocked by this inhibitor. Together, these data indicate that AICAR treatment enhances autophagosome maturation and autophagic flux in BMDMs.
To further evaluate phagosomal maturation by AICAR treatment, we infected BMDMs with ERFP-Mtb, followed by treatment with or without AICAR. Notably, AICAR treatment of Mtb-infected BMDMs resulted in an increased colocalization of the autophagosomal marker LC3 and phagosomes containing labeled Mtb (Fig. 1C and D; Video 1). Ultrastructural analysis of AICAR-treated, Mtb-infected BMDMs revealed bacilli within characteristic double-membrane autophagosomes (Fig. 1E). We next assessed the role of autophagy in antimicrobial responses in macrophages. Treatment of Mtb-infected BMDMs with AICAR inhibited the survival of intracellular bacilli in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1G), and this was reversed by treatment with pharmacologic inhibitors of autophagy pathways (Fig. 1G) or by transduction with lentiviral shRNA specific to autophagy-related genes (Atgs) including ATG5, ATG7, and BECN1 (Fig. 1H). These data indicate that AICAR induces autophagy-dependent phagosomal maturation and antimicrobial responses against Mtb in macrophages.
AICAR-induced AMPK activation is required for MTOR inhibition, autophagy activation, and antimicrobial activity in macrophages infected with Mtb
As AICAR induces autophagy and antimicrobial responses, we sought to determine whether AMPK activation by AICAR involves the inhibition of Mtb-mediated MTOR activation. As AMPK activity is regulated by reversible phosphorylation of Thr172 of the catalytic α-subunit of AMPK,7,19 we first measured AICAR-induced phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 and the downstream target, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACACA/B) (Fig. 2A). Importantly, Mtb infection of BMDMs also induced a much less, but significant, phosphorylation of AMPK and ACACA/B, than AICAR-treated cells, in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). It was noted that AICAR treatment markedly amplified the AMPK and ACACA/B phosphorylation in Mtb-infected conditions in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). We previously showed that Mtb infection of human macrophages increases activation of the MTOR-RPS6KB1/S6K1 (ribosomal protein S6kinase, 70 kDa, polypeptide 1) pathway.20 Therefore, we further examined the effects of AICAR on MTOR phosphorylation in BMDMs infected with Mtb. Infection of macrophages with Mtb rapidly increased the phosphorylation of MTOR at Ser-2448 within 15 to 30 min, which then substantially decreased until 8 h, and increased again at later time points (after 16 h) (Fig. 2B). In Mtb-infcted cells at the early (30 min) or late (16 h) time points, AICAR treatment decreased the Mtb-induced phosphorylation of MTOR in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2D).
Figure 2. AICAR-induced AMPK activation is required for MTOR inhibition, autophagy activation, and antimicrobial activity in Mtb-infected BMDMs. (A–D) AMPK activation and MTOR inhibition by AICAR in BMDMs. BMDMs were treated with AICAR (0.5 mM, for A) or Mtb (MOI = 5, for B) for the times indicated. BMDMs were infected with Mtb for 4 h, incubated with or without AICAR (0.1, 0.5, 1 mM) for 1 h (C and D), followed by IB to detect phosphorylated forms of AMPKA, ACACA/B, and ACTIN (A–C) or phosphorylated and total forms of MTOR (B and D). (E) BMDMs pretreated with AMPK inhibitor compound C (Comp C, 10 μM for 1 h) were infected with Mtb (MOI = 10) for 4 h, and then incubated with AICAR for 24 h. The cells were fixed and labeled with Alexa 488-conjugated anti-LC3 and DAPI. Quantitative analysis of LC3+ puncta per cell. (F–H) Intracellular survival of Mtb assessed by CFU assay. (F and H) BMDMs were infected with Mtb, followed by treatment with Comp C (1 h), and then incubated with (F; AICAR, 0.5 mM) or without AICAR (H) for 3 d. (G) BMDMs were transduced with lentivirus expressing nonspecific shRNA (sh-Ns) or shRNA specific for AMPKa (sh-Ampka) with polybrene (8 μg/mL). After 3 d, BMDMs were infected with Mtb, treated with AICAR, and then lysed to determine intracellular bacterial loads. (Top) Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to determine the efficiency of lentiviral transduction. All data represent the means ± SD from 3 experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with solvent control (F and H) or AICAR-treated condition (G). SC, solvent control. CFU, colony-forming units. ns, not significant.
ULK1, the upstream kinase of autophagy machinery, has been known to be regulated via differential phosphorylation by AMPK and MTOR.21 We further investigated AICAR-induced ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser317 and Ser555 (activating), and at Ser757 (inhibitory)22 in BMDMs. AICAR treatment induced robust ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser317 and Ser555, the levels of which were significantly amplified in BMDMs infected with Mtb (Fig. S2). However, Mtb infection led to a significantly lower induction of ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser317 and Ser555 in BMDMs, whereas it strongly induced ULK1 Ser757 phosphorylation (Fig. S2). In addition, Mtb-induced ULK1 Ser757 phosphorylation was significantly inhibited by AICAR or rapamycin treatment (Fig. S2 and data not shown), confirming the dependence of ULK1 Ser 757 phosphorylation on MTOR activity.
We further investigated whether AICAR-induced autophagy activation and antimicrobial responses were mediated through AMPK pathway activation. We observed that AICAR-induced LC3 puncta formation was significantly inhibited in Mtb-infected BMDMs at 1 h by pretreatment with compound C, a pharmacological inhibitor of the AMPK pathway (Fig. 2E). We then examined whether the AICAR-induced antimicrobial activity was dependent on AMPK activation. Blockade of AMPK activity by compound C significantly decreased AICAR-mediated antimicrobial responses in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2F). Additionally, AICAR-induced antimicrobial responses against Mtb were significantly downregulated in cells transduced with shAmpka (Fig. 2G). Pretreatment of BMDMs with compound C considerably increased the intracellular survival of Mtb even without AICAR treatment (Fig. 2H), suggesting that Mtb-induced AMPK activation is required for the basal host defense against Mtb in macrophages. However, Mtb-induced AMPK activation appeared to be transient and insufficient to inhibit MTOR activation during Mtb infection. Thus, our data indicate that treatment of macrophages with an AMPK-activating agent may overcome MTOR activation during Mtb infection, leading to antimicrobial activity.
AICAR treatment increases the induction of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes, ATP, and mass in Mtb-infected macrophages
AICAR treatment increases mitochondrial density and oxidative machinery in various tissues, including white adipose tissue.23 However, in macrophages, it is not known whether AICAR treatment can control mitochondrial function, density, and morphology, especially during infection. To address the role of AICAR in the activation of mitochondrial function, we first examined the mRNA and protein expressions of macrophage respiratory chain complexes I–V, which were all significantly elevated in Mtb-infected, AICAR-treated BMDMs, compared with untreated or other conditions (Fig. 3A; Fig. S3A). Notably, 10 of these 12 genes (except SDHB and ATP5G3) were significantly upregulated by AICAR treatment in macrophages infected with Mtb, compared with other conditions (Fig. 3A). We next assessed mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in BMDMs using a potentiometric fluorescent probe (TMRE) and flow cytometry. The Mtb-infected, AICAR-treated ΔΨm was significantly higher than those of cells under other conditions (Fig. S3B). In addition, ATP levels were significantly increased by AICAR treatment in Mtb-infected cells, compared with those under other conditions (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3. AICAR treatment increases the induction of mitochondrial OXPHOS gene expression, ATP synthesis, and mitochondrial mass in Mtb-infected macrophages. (A and B) AICAR induces upregulation of OXPHOS genes. BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h, incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 6 h (A) or the times indicated (B), and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR of OXPHOS genes (A) or Intracellular ATP was quantified by a fluorometric method (B). (C–E) BMDMs were infected with Mtb for 4 h, incubated with AICAR for 24 h. (C) Mitotracker fluorescence signals assessed by a flow cytometric analysis. (Left) Representative histograms from 7 independent replicates. (Right) Bar graph indicates the mitochondrial mass MFIs. (D) Mitochondrial marker TOMM20 signals were assessed using a confocal microscope (60×). Magnified view of corresponding boxed areas in the right panels. Scale bar: 5 µm. (E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). (Top) Representative TEM images from 3 independent experiments are shown. (Bottom) Bar graph indicates the mitochondrial number. Scale bar: 1 µm. Data shown are from one representative of at least 3 independent experiments (means ± SD of triplicate [A–C right, and E bottom] samples). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with AICAR-treated condition (A, C, and E). U, untreated control.
AICAR treatment significantly increased the mitochondrial content of Mtb-infected BMDMs (Fig. 3C) and HeLa cells (data not shown). Moreover, morphologic analysis revealed that AICAR treatment of Mtb-infected BMDMs led to a substantial increase in the proportion of elongated mitochondria, compared with those of untreated or Mtb-infected BMDMs (Fig. 3D). As shown in Figure 3E, ultrastructural imaging showed that few mitochondria were present in resting, untreated BMDMs. However, Mtb infection caused an increase in the number of mitochondria, most of which were swollen. AICAR treatment resulted in an apparent increase in mitochondrial number when compared with untreated controls. Notably, Mtb-infected, AICAR-treated BMDMs showed a greater increases in number in the number of mitochondria together with qualitative improvements (Fig. 3E). Consistent with this, we also observed that mitochondrial DNA content was increased in Mtb-infected BMDMs after AICAR treatment (Fig. S3C). Thus, these data indicate that AICAR treatment enhances expression of the genes involved in mitochondrial OXPHOS and ATP synthesis as well as mitochondrial mass in macrophages infected with Mtb.
AMPK activation leads to the induction of PPARGC1A, which is required for mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in Mtb-infected macrophages
Previous studies have demonstrated that AMPK-mediated PPARGC1A induction plays an important role in the coordinate regulation of mitochondrial gene expression and glucose metabolism in a variety of tissues.24,25 However, little is known about the profiles of PPARGC1A and other genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis in macrophages. We next investigated whether AICAR treatment of BMDMs leads to the induction of PPARGC1A and genes regulating mitochondrial biogenesis. Both Mtb infection and AICAR treatment induced substantially more PPARGC1A mRNA than observed in untreated, resting BMDMs (Fig. 4A and B). Notably, AICAR treatment of Mtb-infected BMDMs robustly upregulated the mRNAs and proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, such as PPARGC1A, NFE2L (nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like) 1, NFE2L2, TFAM, and CYCS (cytochrome C, somatic) (Fig. 4A and B). In line with the role of AMPK in the upregulation of PPARGC1A,26 we further examined whether AMPK signaling plays a role in the induction of PPARGC1A in macrophages. Blockade of the AMPK pathway caused a substantial decrease in the Ppargc1a mRNA level (Fig. S4A and B), suggesting that AMPK functions downstream of PPARGC1A expression.
Figure 4. AMPK-induced PPARGC1A is required for mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in Mtb-infected BMDMs. (A) AICAR induces upregulation of OXPHOS proteins. BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5), incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for the indicated times, and subjected to IB analysis with antibodies to PPARGC1A, NFE2L1, TFAM, CYCS, and ACTIN. (B) BMDMs were transduced with lentivirus expressing nonspecific shRNA (sh-Ns) or shRNA specific for PPARGC1A (sh-Ppargc1a) with polybrene (8 μg/mL). After 3 d, BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h, incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 6 h, and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR to determine mRNA expression of Ppargc1a, Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Tfam. (C–E) The experimental conditions were as outlined in (B). BMDMs were infected with Mtb for 4 h, incubated with AICAR for 16 h. (C) MitoTracker fluorescence signals were assessed by FACS analysis. (Top) Representative histograms of 7 independent replicates. (Bottom) Bar graph indicating the mitochondrial mass as MFIs. (D) Cellular ATP was quantified fluorometrically using an ATP bioluminiscent assay kit. (E) mtDNA content in BMDMs measured by quantitative real-time PCR. The mtDNA content was normalized to nuclear DNA. Data shown are from one representative of at least 3 independent experiments (means ± SD from triplicate (B, C bottom, D, E) samples). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with sh-Ns (B–E). U, untreated control. ns, no significant.
Given that AMPK activation upregulated PPARGC1A in Mtb-infected macrophages, we determined whether PPARGC1A is required for the induction of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in Mtb-infected macrophages. BMDMs were transduced with shRNA lentiviral vectors that specifically targeted Ppargc1a. We found that the mRNA levels of Nrf1, Nrf2, and Tfam were significantly depressed in BMDMs upon silencing of Ppargc1a (Fig. 4B). In addition, the markedly increased mitochondrial mass and ATP generation in Mtb/AICAR-treated macrophages were significantly decreased by Ppargc1a-knockdown of cells (Fig. 4C and D). Further, the mitochondrial DNA content was considerably decreased in Ppargc1a-knockdown BMDMs (Fig. 4E). Together, these data suggest that AMPK-PPARGC1A is required for the induction of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and the synthesis of ATP in Mtb-infected macrophages.
PPARGC1A contributes to antimicrobial responses against mycobacteria in vitro and in vivo
It has previously been shown that ATP stimulation promoted killing of virulent Mtb and BCG mycobacteria in macrophages in a P2X7-dependent and -independent manner.27,28 The finding of the critical role of PPARGC1A in mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in Mtb-infected macrophages led us to hypothesize that PPARGC1A contributes to AMPK-induced antimicrobial responses. We thus examined whether PPARGC1A is required for antimicrobial responses against Mtb infection. Remarkably, Ppargc1a-knockdown using shRNA specific for Ppargc1a led to a significant increase of intracellular Mtb in BMDMs, when compared with those transduced with nonspecific shRNA (Fig. 5A). In addition, AICAR-mediated antimicrobial responses were dose-dependently attenuated in Ppargc1a-knockdown BMDMs (Fig. 5A). We further questioned whether the colocalization of Mtb phagosomes and autophagosomes are decreased in BMDMs by knockdown of Ppargc1a. As shown in Figure 5B, AICAR-induced upregulation of Mtb phagosomes and autophagosomes was significantly decreased by silencing of Ppargc1a in BMDMs, suggesting an essential role for PPARGC1A in the phagosomal maturation of Mtb. Importantly, we found that the AICAR-induced increase of LC3 autophagosome formation was also markedly abrogated in Mtb-infected BMDMs by knockdown of Ppargc1a (Fig. 5B).
Figure 5. PPARGC1A is required for antimicrobial responses against mycobacteria in vitro and in vivo. (A) At 3 d post-transduction with lentivirus-sh-NS or lentivirus-sh-Ppargc1a, BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 1 or 10) for 4 h and then incubated with AICAR and then lysed to determine intracellular bacterial loads. (Right) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses show the efficiencies of lentiviral transduction. (B) (Left) BMDMs were infected with ERFP-Mtb (MOI = 10) for 4 h, incubated with or without AICAR (0.5 mM) for 24 h, then fixed and stained with anti-LC3 (Alexa 488) to detect autophagosomes and DAPI. Scale bars: 5 μm. (Right) Quantitative data of colocalization analyses (%). Colocalization analyses between the autophagosomal marker LC3 (green) and the bacterial phagosome containing ERFP-Mtb (red). (C) Control and Ppargc1 mutant flies were infected with M. marinum (CFU = 500) and then treated with or without AICAR (1 mM). Dead flies were counted at 1-d intervals. The error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Log-rank analysis of the survival curves indicated that each condition (n = 120) was significantly different (***P < 0.001). (D) After 3 d, each group of flies was harvested, homogenized, and quantified by CFU assay. The experiments were repeated 3 times. Data shown are from one representative of at least 3 independent experiments (means ± SD from triplicate (A, B right, D) samples). ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with sh-Ns (B). SC, solvent control. CFU, colony-forming units. ns, not significant.
To study the in vivo innate role of PPARGC1A using Drosophila melanogaster, a genetically tractable model host for Mm,29 we examined whether the Drosophila PPARGC1 family ortholog, Spargel, is required for the expression of multiple genes encoding mitochondrial proteins.30 When control and Spargel mutant flies were injected with Mm and monitored survival for 25 d, Spargel mutant flies succumbed rapidly to Mm challenge, compared with control flies (Fig. 5C). Control flies given food containing AICAR showed significantly increased survival after Mm injection (Fig. 5C). A substantially increased, but not complete, protective effect was observed in AICAR-administered Spargel mutant flies after Mm infection (Fig. 5C). Viable bacterial counts in surviving Spargel mutant flies infected with Mm were consistently higher than those in control flies infected with Mm (after 3 d; n = 20 per group) (Fig. 5D). Notably, AICAR administration to Spargel mutant flies did not decrease bacterial loads to the levels observed in control flies (Fig. 5D). Taken together, our data support a critical function of PPARGC1A in antibacterial host defense against mycobacteria in vitro and in vivo.
AMPK-induced PPARGC1A is required for the upregulation of multiple autophagy-related genes via CEBPB
The key functions of the autophagy pathway are mediated by a number of autophagy-related (ATG) genes that were identified in yeast genetic screens, and found in higher eukaryotes.31,32 Despite the proposed functions of the ATG proteins, which are involved in the essential steps of autophagosome formation and lysosomal degradation,31,32 the molecular mechanisms by which the induction of Atg genes are modulated are poorly understood. As we observed that PPARGC1A was required for an AICAR-induced increase in LC3-dependent autophagosome formation, we next determined whether PPARGC1A is involved in autophagy induction through activation of Atg genes in macrophages. We first examined whether AICAR treatment results in the mRNA expression of Atg genes including Atg5, Becn1, Atg7, and Lc3b. Treatment of Mtb-infected BMDMs with AICAR induced significant upregulation of Atg5, Becn1, Atg7, and Lc3b mRNA (Fig. 6A). Importantly, PPARGC1A was required for the induction of mRNA expression (Fig. 6A) and promoter activation of Atg5, Becn1, and Atg7 (Fig. 6B) in Mtb-infected BMDMs treated with AICAR.
Figure 6. The AMPK-PPARGC1A pathway is required for upregulation of multiple autophagy-related genes in macrophages via CEBPB. (A) BMDMs were transduced with lentiviruses expressing nonspecific shRNA (sh-NS) or specific shRNA for PPARGC1A (sh-Ppargc1a). After 3 d, BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h and then incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 6 h, followed by RT-PCR analyses of Atg5, Becn1, Lc3b, Ppargc1a, and Gapdh. (B) Raw264.7 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing sh-NS or sh-Ppargc1a, followed by transfection with a pGL3 basic, pGL3-ATG5-1P, or pGL3-ATG5-3P (Top), a pGL3 basic, pGL3-BECN1-1P, or pGL3- BECN1-3P (Middle) or a pGL3 basic, pGL3-ATG7-1P, or pGL3-ATG7-2P (Bottom) luciferase reporter construct. After 48 h, cells were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h, incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 6 h and then a luciferase assay was performed. The luciferase activity was measured and normalized to Renilla luciferase enzyme activities. (C) Schematic representation of the human ATG5 (Top), BECN1 (Middle), and ATG7 (Bottom) promoter-reporter construct generation. Potential CEBPB binding sites located in the 5′-flanking region of genes ATG5, BECN1, and ATG7 are shown as numbered boxes. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of residues matching the consensus. n = A, T, G, or C; K = G or T; *, antisense orientation. (D and E) The experimental conditions were as outlined in (B). (D) THP-1 cells were cotransfected with a scrambled control siRNA (si-NS) or si-CEBPB, together with a pGL3 basic, pGL3-ATG5-1P, or pGL3-ATG5-3P (Top), a pGL3 basic, pGL3-BECN1-1P, or pGL3-BECN1-3P (Middle) or a pGL3 basic, pGL3-ATG7-1P, or pGL3-ATG7-2P (Bottom) luciferase reporter construct (E) Raw264.7 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing sh-NS or sh-Ppargc1a, followed by transfection with a pGL3 basic or pGL3-CEBPB luciferase reporter construct. The promoter activities were determined by luciferase assay. (F and G) The experimental conditions were as outlined in (A). BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h, incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 16 h. (F) Cells were harvested followed by IB with anti-LC3, anti-PPARGC1A, and anti-ACTIN. Data shown are from 1 representative of at least 3 independent experiments (means ± SD of triplicate (B, D, and E) samples). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with sh-NS (B, D, and E). U, untreated control. ns, not significant.
Previously, we have shown that vitamin D-dependent BECN1 and ATG5 transcriptional activation was mediated through CEBPB activation.33 In the promoter regions of ATG5, ATG7, and BECN1, putative CEBPB-binding sites were found (Fig. 6C). Thus, we considered whether the AICAR-induced AMPK-PPARGC1A pathway is involved in the activation of CEBPB to induce Atg genes. Treatment of macrophages with AICAR significantly increased the promoter activity and mRNA levels of autophagy genes including ATG5, BECN1, and ATG7, which were abrogated by knockdown of CEBPB (Fig. 6D and data not shown). Silencing of Ppargc1a significantly decreased CEBPB, but not RELA/NF-κB p65, transcription, as measured by luciferase reporter activity (Fig. 6E and data not shown). Furthermore, the silencing of Ppargc1a markedly reduced LC3-II in all BMDM cultures (Fig. 6F), suggesting an important role for PPARGC1A in autophagy activation. Taken together, these findings suggest a role for the AMPK-PPARGC1A pathway in the activation of autophagy through CEBPB-dependent regulation of autophagy genes.
Defective autophagy in macrophages leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of host defense against mycobacteria
As our data showed that AICAR treatment resulted in the activation of mitochondrial function in Mtb-infected macrophages, represented by the increased ATP synthesis and mitochondrial contents, we next determined whether there exists a potential link between autophagy and mitochondria in the AMPK-induced activation of host defense using macrophages from Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ mice. The ablation of Atg7 expression in macrophages resulted in a significant decrease in LC3-II levels in response to AICAR (Fig. 7A). In addition, a common substrate of autophagic degradation, SQSTM1, was found to accumulate, indicating a lack of autophagic degradation in BMDMs from Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ mice (Fig. 7A). Notably, Atg7-deficient macrophages infected with Mtb showed depletion of ATP content in response to AICAR treatment, when compared with their Atg7+ littermates (Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre-) (Fig. 7B). It is worth noting that BMDMs from Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ mice showed a marked loss of ΔΨm, even in untreated conditions (Fig. 7C). Mitochondrial DNA content in response to AICAR treatment was also significantly decreased in Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ macrophages infected with Mtb (Fig. 7D). Further, ultrastructural analysis revealed that the mitochondria of Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ BMDMs were significantly damaged; i.e., there was destruction of mitochondrial cristae, which were shortened, blurred, and dissolved. In addition, almost all mitochondria showed extreme swelling and vacuolization. The external and internal membranes were destroyed, and numerous mitochondria had ruptured (Fig. 7E; Fig. S5). AICAR treatment did not reverse the damaged mitochondrial morphology of Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ BMDMs (Fig. 7E; Fig. S5).
Figure 7. Defective autophagy in macrophages leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased intracellular growth of mycobacteria. (A to F) Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre+ and Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre- BMDMs were infected with Mtb (MOI = 5) for 4 h and then treated with AICAR (0.5 mM) for 24 h (A–C, E and F) or 6 h (D). (A) Cells were harvested and followed by IB with anti-LC3, anti-SQSTM1, anti-ATG7, and anti-ACTIN. (B) Cells were infected with Mtb, incubated with AICAR, and then cellular ATP was quantified fluorometrically using an ATP bioluminescent assay kit. (C) Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was measured using a potentiometric fluorescent probe (TMRE), followed by flow cytometric analysis. (D) mtDNA content in BMDMs measured by quantitative real-time PCR. The mtDNA content was normalized to nuclear DNA. (E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis for Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre+ BMDMs infected with Mtb (MOI = 10), followed by treatment with AICAR. Scale bar: 1 µm. (F) Quantitative data of colocalization analyses (%). Colocalization analyses between the autophagosomal marker LC3 (green) and the bacterial phagosome containing ERFP-Mtb (red). (G and H) Intracellular survival of Mtb (G) or BCG (H) assessed by CFU assay. Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre+ and Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre- BMDMs were infected with Mtb (G) or BCG (H) for 4 h, incubated with AICAR (0.5 mM), and then lysed to determine intracellular bacterial loads. (I) The mice were infected with BCG (1 × 107 CFU/mouse, i.v.) for 3 wks and then AICAR (500 mg/kg, i.p.) treated for 3 consecutive days. The mice were sacrificed 4 wks after BCG infection and bacterial loads of infected mice (n = 5 per group) in spleen were determined by CFU assay. Data shown are from one representative of at least 3 independent experiments (means ± SD of triplicate (B, D, F–I) samples). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (2-tailed Student t test), compared with Atg7fl/fl LysM-Cre- (B and D) or AICAR-treated condition (G and H). U, untreated control. SC, solvent control. CFU, colony-forming units. ns, not significant.
Next, we determined whether AICAR-induced autophagy is required for the enhancement of phagosomal maturation and antimicrobial responses against intracellular mycobacteria. To evaluate phagosomal maturation, we infected Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ and their Atg7+ littermates with ERFP-Mtb, followed by treatment with or without AICAR. Notably, the increased colocalization of the autophagosomal marker LC3 and bacterial phagosomes in Atg7+ macrophages were significantly decreased in Atg7-deficient BMDMs (Fig. 7F). When treated with AICAR, Atg7+ macrophages showed significantly increased killing of Mtb or BCG (Mycobacterium bovis BCG), whereas this was almost completely abrogated in Atg7-deficient BMDMs (Fig. 7G and H). In vivo administration of AICAR (500 mg kg-1 body weight) in BCG-infected Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ mice34 significantly inhibited in vivo bacterial growth in spleens, whereas this was markedly reduced in their Atg7+ littermates (Fig. 7I). Collectively, these data indicate that defective autophagy involves mitochondrial dysfunction and decreased antimicrobial responses to mycobacterial infection.
Discussion
Numerous intracellular bacterial pathogens, including Mtb, avoid or circumvent host antimicrobial pathways. Emerging evidence supports an important role for the autophagy pathway in mediating the effector function of innate immune responses against intracellular pathogens, including Mtb, through enhancement of phagosome-lysosome fusion.1,35 However, the mechanisms of autophagy-activating drugs that lead to the beneficial outcomes of antimicrobial responses against mycobacterial infections are poorly understood. Here we show that the AMPK-activating agent, AICAR, plays an important role in antimicrobial responses against mycobacterial infection through activation of autophagy. Our findings suggest a novel mechanism by which AMPK-mediated induction of PPARGC1A contributes to autophagy activation, which leads to an antimicrobial response as part of the host defense program (see Fig. S6).
AMPK is an important energy-responsive enzyme and plays a key role in metabolic homeostasis.8,36 As such, it is an attractive therapeutic target for chronic inflammatory and metabolic disorders.8,36 AMPK is a universal autophagy regulator, as autophagy is induced by various calcium-mobilizing agents (vitamin D compounds, thapsigargin, ATP, and ionomycin) through CAMKK2 (calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase 2, β).10 Previously, we have demonstrated that AMPK plays a critical role in toll-like receptor 2/1-induced and vitamin D-mediated autophagy activation and antimicrobial activity against Mtb.33,37 We also found that AMPK was activated in BMDMs after treatment with IFNG or vitamin D (data not shown). Considering the molecular mechanisms through which AMPK activates autophagy, AMPK was found to activate ULK1, a homolog of yeast ATG1, via phosphorylation of Ser31722 and Ser555,38 thus initiating the autophagy pathway. AICAR treatment of macrophages robustly activated ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser317 and Ser555 (activating), whereas Mtb infection resulted in inhibitory ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser757 via MTOR activation. Together, these findings suggest that an increase in AMPK-ULK1 activation via agents such as AICAR may provide a strategy to augment autophagy and host antibacterial responses against Mtb.
AMPK is regarded as an autophagy-promoting kinase, whereas MTOR is reported to have the opposite effect.22 Previous studies reveal that Mtb, as well as other mycobacterial strains, induce MTOR-RPS6KB1,20,39 and that inhibition of MTOR activity contributed to reduction of bacterial viability.39 It was also noted that Mtb infection induced an increase in MTOR activation at early and late time points (see Fig. 2). Although transient activation of the AMPK pathway may contribute to the basal host defense, the majority of Mtb bacilli appear to resist phagosomal maturation through MTOR activation. Our data are important in demonstrating that the consequence of AICAR-induced AMPK signaling is to override the MTOR activation induced by Mtb infection through autophagy activation. These findings also support the earlier reports by Gutierrez et al.40 showing that autophagy activation through MTOR inhibition enhances phagosomal maturation of Mtb and leads to antimicrobial host defense.
AMPK activation of macrophages markedly increased the levels of OXPHOS genes and proteins, mitochondrial ATP synthesis, and biogenesis, especially in Mtb-infected cells. Our findings are compatible with recent data showing that, in response to macroautophagy or nutrient depletion, mitochondria elongate and are interconnected, protected from autophagic degradation, thus maximizing ATP levels and sustaining cell survival.41,42 The finding that AICAR-induced PPARGC1A is required for the gene expression of Nfe2l-1, -2, and Tfam, in Mtb-infected macrophages is consistent with a previous similar observation for PPARGC1A in mitochondria-rich tissues (skeletal muscle, heart, liver, and brain).24,25 In these tissues, PPARGC1A increases mitochondrial DNA replication and respiratory subunit mRNA transcription by upregulating mitochondrial biogenesis through induction of NRF-1, -2, and mitochondrial Tfam.24,25
In studies of host metabolism, a protective role for the PPARGC1 family of transcriptional coactivators in the cellular stress response has been observed.25 PPARGC1B is required for host defense against Listeria infection.43 However, the roles of other PPARGC1 family genes in host defense are not well understood. Our results also highlight the importance of PPARGC1A in antimicrobial host defense as well as mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in macrophages. Previous studies show that host defense against infection depends on mitochondrial biogenesis to protect the cellular energy supply during stress, as well as the recycling of damaged mitochondria through the autophagy pathway.44 In addition, increased ATP synthesis has been shown in antimicrobial responses against mycobacteria in macrophages through P2X7-dependent and -independent mechanisms.27,28 Together with the present findings, we speculate that PPARGC1A-induced mitochondrial biogenesis and ATP synthesis in Mtb-infected macrophages contributes to AMPK-induced antimicrobial responses in macrophages. Our findings further demonstrate an essential role for PPARGC1 in host defense by showing that Spargel mutant flies were susceptible, and succumbed rapidly, to mycobacterial infection. Importantly, the effects of PPARGC1 on in vivo susceptibility and bacterial load in mutant flies were greater than those observed in macrophages with regard to mycobacterial growth. It is not clear whether PPARGC1-dependent metabolic changes may affect the robustness of host defense in the fly model, which is useful for investigation of the metabolic consequences of microbial infection and the immune response.45-47 Previous investigations demonstrate that infection-induced host responses are closely linked to gut damage and metabolic disturbance in Drosophila.45-47 Additional studies are needed to fully elucidate the association of metabolic alteration and antimicrobial responses via the AMPK-PPARGC1A pathway.
Although numerous studies have focused on autophagy regulation at the translational level, emerging data suggest that transcriptional control also influences the autophagic process in response to diverse stimuli or stresses. Several transcription factors and molecules have been reported to induce or regulate the transcription of autophagy genes in various steps of autophagy and lysosome biogenesis.48-50 Our data provide evidence that PPARGC1A, induced by AICAR-induced AMPK activation, triggers antimicrobial activity, of which at least one mechanism is the CEBPB-mediated induction of autophagy genes to induce antibacterial autophagy. It has been shown that increased PPARGC1A expression is strictly dependent on the binding of CEBPB to the proximal PPARGC1A promoter in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.51 Moreover, CEBPB is a potent activator of autophagy, especially in the regulation of the rhythmical activation of physiological autophagy through modulation of cyclic induction of autophagy genes in primary hepatocytes.52 Our previous studies demonstrate that CEBPB promotes the transcriptional activation of ATG5 and BECN1, which contributes to vitamin D-induced autophagy activation in macrophages.33 We also found that PPARGC1A was involved in autophagy activation and colocalization of Mtb and autophagosomes. Together with the current data, these findings provide new insight into a novel role for PPARGC1A in host defense through transcriptional control of autophagy genes via CEBPB.
Autophagy plays a potentially important housekeeping role by targeting dysfunctional mitochondria and by maintaining the energy metabolism of the cell.53 Earlier studies using a yeast model system show that deletion of essential autophagy genes results in mitochondrial defects, involving decreased oxygen consumption rates and mitochondrial electron transport chain activities.54 Recent studies show that mice with selective genetic deletion of autophagy genes in macrophages exhibit defective autophagic killing of BCG or Mtb.55,56 Our data are consistent with previous reports that blocking the autophagy process leads to an increase in mitochondrial dysfunction, release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), and translocation of mitochondrial DNA.57 In addition, it is also speculated that depletion of ATP synthesis in autophagy-defective conditions may affect overall antimicrobial activity and autophagy function. Together with the current data, these findings indicate that mitochondrial defects and dysfunction in autophagy-defective macrophages lead to detrimental effects on the inhibition of mycobacterial growth. Our working hypothesis holds that successful innate host defense during a cytoplasmic war against bacterial infection may require efficient and potent activation of xenophagy induced by AMPK-activating agents, not only for inhibition of Mtb-induced MTOR activation, but also for autophagosomal biogenesis through transcriptional activation of autophagy genes (see Fig. S6). These findings underscore a novel role for the AMPK-PPARGC1A axis in enhancing autophagic function and antimicrobial responses.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR, A9978), 3-methyladenine (3-MA, M9281), 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, D9542), and N′-(7-chloroquinolin-4-yl)-N,N-diethyl-pentane-1,4-diamine (chloroquine, C6628) were purchased from Sigma. Compound C (171260), wortmannin (WM, 681675), bafilomycin A1 (Baf-A, 196000) were purchased from Calbiochem. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma, D8418) was added to the cultures at 0.1% (v/v) as a solvent control.
Mice and cell culture
The mice used in individual experiments were age- (6 to 8 wk) and sex-matched. Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were purchased from SAMTAKO BIO (Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Atg7-floxed mice (Atg7fl/fl, C57BL/6 background) mice were kindly provided by Dr Masaaki Komatsu (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan). To generate transgenic myeloid lineage cell-specific Atg7-deficient mice (Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+) using the Cre/loxP recombination system, Atg7fl/fl mice were crossed with B6.129P2-Lyz2tm1(cre)Ifo/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory) expressing Cre recombinase under the control of a Lyzs promoter. F1 progeny from Atg7fl/flLysM-Cre+ × Atg7fl/fl crosses were genotyped for the presence (LysM-Cre+) or absence (LysM-Cre-) of the LysM-Cre allele. Cre-mediated recombination was confirmed by PCR using genomic DNA from isolated from peritoneal macrophages and primers flanking the floxed region, as described previously.58 Bone marrow was harvested from these mice and differentiated into macrophages. Absence of expression of Atg7 in these macrophages was confirmed by immunoblot analysis using an ATG7-specific antibody (Cell Signaling, 2631) (Fig. 7A). Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal-related procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Chungnam National University School of Medicine (Daejeon, Korea). All animal-related procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Chungnam National University School of Medicine (Daejeon, Korea).
Mice were maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions. Primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were isolated and differentiated by growth for 5 to 7 d in medium containing macrophage colony-stimulating factor (25 ng/mL; R&D Systems, 416-ML) as described previously.11 The culture medium was Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Lonza, 12-604F), containing 4 mM glutamine and 10% FBS (Lonza, BW14-503E).
The mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 (ATCC TIB-71; American Type Culture Collection) was maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS, sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino acids, penicillin G (100 IU/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). Human monocytic THP-1 (ATCC TIB-202) cells were grown in RPMI 1640/glutamax (Lonza, 12-702F) supplemented with 10% FBS, and then were treated with 20 nM PMA (Sigma-Aldrich, P8139) for 24 h to induce their differentiation into macrophage-like cells, followed by washing 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Transient transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, 11668) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Mycobacterial strains
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (Mtb) was kindly provided by R L Friedmann (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA). Mycobacterium bovis BCG was obtained from the Korean Institute of Tuberculosis (Osong, Korea). Mycobacteria were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 (Difco, 271310) medium supplemented with 0.5% glycerol, 0.5% Tween-80 (Sigma, P1754), and 10% oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase (OADC; BD Biosciences, 212240). The enhanced Mtb-red fluorescent protein (ERFP) was described previously.11 The Mtb-ERFP strain was cultivated in 7H9-OADC plus kanamycin (50 μg/ml; Sigma, 60615).
For Drosophila infection, the M. marinum strain Aronson (ATCC 927, fish isolate) was cultured in 7H9 broth with OADC and 0.2% Tween 80, at 30 °C in the dark without agitation, as described previously.11
For all assays, mid-log-phase bacteria (absorbance, 0.4 to 0.7) were used. Batch cultures were aliquoted and stored at -80 °C. Representative vials were thawed and enumerated for viable colony-forming units (CFU) on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Difco, 262710). The effective concentration of LPS was < 50 pg/ml in those experiments with a bacterium-to-cell ratio of 10:1. Single-cell suspensions of mycobacteria were prepared and used to infect cells as described previously.59
Mycobacterial infection and colony-forming unit assays
To ensure the reliable quantification of intracellular bacteria, CFU assays were utilized. Cells were infected for 2 to 4 h with Mtb, Mtb-ERFP, or M. bovis BCG at different MOIs. Next, cells were washed 3 times with PBS, and fresh medium containing amikacin (Sigma; 200 μg/ml, A0368000) was added. After various periods of incubation, cells were lysed with 0.3% saponin (Sigma, 47036) to release the intracellular bacteria, and the lysates of infected cells were then resuspended vigorously, transferred to screw-capped tubes, and sonicated in a preheated 37 °C water bath sonicator (Elma) for 5 min. Aliquots of the sonicates were diluted 10-fold in 7H9 medium. Four dilutions of each sample were plated separately on 7H10 agar plates and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 14 to 21 d.
M. bovis BCG infection and bacterial growth in vivo
M. bovis BCG were thawed immediately before injection and diluted with saline to a final volume of 100 μL per mouse. Mice were held down in a restrainer, and their tails were mildly heated with a heating lamp to achieve vasodilatation. M. bovis BCG (1 × 107 CFU/mouse) were injected through the tail vein slowly with a 30-gauge needle. After injection, mild pressure was applied at the spot of injection until no bleeding was achieved, to prevent the backflow of virus solution. Mice were monitored daily for 30 d. For measurement of the bacterial burden in the spleen, mice were sacrificed at 4 d after AICAR (500 mg/kg, i.p.) injection for 3 d, organs were homogenized in PBST, and serial dilutions of the homogenates were plated on 7H10 agar plates, with colonies counted 14 d later.
M. marinum infection and bacterial growth in vivo
M. marinum was cultured, and flies were maintained as described previously.11 The Ppargc1 homolog Spargel mutant (P{SUPor-P}CG9809KG08646ry506) and wild-type control (ry506) flies were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center (Indiana University). For infection, 3- to 5-d-old Ppargc1 mutant or control30 male flies were collected and infected as previously described.11 After infection, flies were transferred to fresh standard cornmeal medium or AICAR medium (1 mM) and maintained at 25 °C and 60% humidity. Flies were transferred to fresh vials at least once per wk. For the AICAR effect of the M. marinum infection, Ppargc1 mutant or control files were infected with GFP-M. marinum (CFU = 500) by direct injection, and then were incubated with or without AICAR-containing medium. These files were incubated at 25 °C and 80% humidity for 3 d. GFP-expressing M. marinum in flies were observed using an Olympus IX81 confocal microscope with fluorescence optics. Determination of bacterial growth within infected flies was performed as described previously.11 These files were infected with M. marinum with or without AICAR-containing medium for 3 d. The homogenized M. marinum-infected flies were serially diluted and plated onto 7H10 agar. After 14 d, calculation of the colony numbers on plates was performed. The experiments were repeated 3 times.
Lentiviral shRNA production and transduction
Lentiviral shRNA produced by transient transfection using packaging plasmids (psPAX2, pMD2.VSV-G, purchased from Addgene) and the target shRNA plasmid DNA (BECN1; RHS4531-EG8678, ATG5; RHS4531-EG9474, ATG7; RHS4531-EG10533, and Ppargc1a (RMM4532-NM_008904) were purchased from Open Biosystems; AMPKA (sc-29674-SH) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were cotransfected into 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, 11668) as described previously.33 Virus-containing medium was collected at 72 h post-transfection and concentrated by ultracentrifugation. Lentiviral vector titration was determined using 293T cells, and the generated lentiviruses were transduced into BMDMs, THP-1, or Raw264.7 cells as described previously.33 For lentivirus infection, cells (5 × 105 /ml) in medium containing 10% FBS were seeded in 24-well plates, and then infected with lentiviral vectors (MOI = 10) in the presence of polybrene (Sigma; 8 μg/ml, H9268). On the following day, the medium was replaced, the cells were incubated for 2 d, and they were then analyzed for target gene knockdown. A parallel experiment using a GFP-encoding lentivirus (the pGIPZ lentiviral vector; Open Biosystems, RMM4431) indicated that 80% of cells were successfully transduced by the virus.
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously.33 For immunoblotting, polypeptides were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). Specific antibodies to LC3 (L8918) and SQSTM1/p62 (P0067) were purchased from Sigma. Antibodies against phospho-ACACA/B (Acetyl-CoA carboxylase) (3661), phospho-AMPKA (2535), AMPKA (2532), phospho-MTOR (2971), phospho-ULK1 Ser317 (12753), Ser555 (5869), Ser757 (6888), MTOR (2983), CYCS/Cyt C (4272), SDHA (5839), and ATG7 (2631) were purchased from Cell Signaling. Anti-TFAM (sc-28200), anti-NFE2L1/NRF1 (sc-28379), anti-NDUFA9 (sc-58392), and anti-ACTIN (sc-1616) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-PPARGC1A (ab54481), anti-COX4l1/COX IV (ab16056), and anti-UQCRC2 (ab14745) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge). Anti-ATP5A1 (459240) was purchased from Invitrogen. These proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Millipore) and exposure to film (FUJI medical X-ray film). For autophagy analysis, cells were treated for 30 min on ice, lysed with 1% Triton X-100, and then subjected to immunoblotting analysis with an antibody against LC3 or SQSTM1/p62.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopic analysis
Endogenous LC3 punctate staining and immunofluorescence analysis were performed as described previously.11 After the appropriate treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, and incubated with anti-LC3 (1:400; MBL International, PM036) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were washed to remove excess primary antibody, and incubated with the appropriate fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained by incubation with DAPI for 5 min. After mounting, fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 710; Zeiss, Thomwood, NY USA). Fluorescence intensity was measured using the ImageJ or Adobe Photoshop CS4 software. Endogenous LC3 punctate dots were enumerated using the ImageJ software. Each condition was assayed in triplicate, and at least 200 cells per well were counted.
For colocalization analysis, the co-distribution of the LC3 autophagosome and bacterial phagosome were quantified and validated statistically by Pearson coefficient, as specified by the ZEN 2009 software (version 5.5 SP1; Zeiss). Images of dynamic cell interactions were recorded as vertical z-stacks (3-dimensional images). Imaris 7.1.1 (Bitplane), Ultraview 5.5 (PerkinElmer), and Adobe Photoshop 7 (Adobe Systems) were used for image processing.
Flow cytometry
Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for LC3B and mitochondria mass using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer as indicated by the manufacturer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA USA). After 2 washes with PBS, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 37 °C or permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. Cells were stained with primary antibodies for 1 to 2 h at 4 °C (1:100) and the secondary antibodies for 1 h on ice. After 2 washes with PBS, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and assayed immediately. Flow cytometry data were collected using 30,000 to 100,000 cells and were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR USA).
Transmission electron microscopy
For transmission electron microscopy analysis, BMDMs were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 h, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide and 0.5% potassium ferricyanide in cacodylate buffer for 1 h, embedded in resin, and cured at 80 °C for 24 h. Ultrathin sections (70 to 80 nm) were cut using an Sorvall RMC MT 6000 MT6000-XL Ultramicrotome (Microtome Service Company, NY USA), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a Tecnai G2 Spirit Twin transmission electron microscope (FEI Co., Hillsoboro, OR USA) and a JEM ARM 1300S high-voltage electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
Measurement of ATP production
ATP levels were measured by the Luciferin/Luciferase method using the ATP Bioluminescence assay kit (PerkinElmer, 6016943) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, ~2 × 105 BMDMs were infected with Mtb or were treated with AICAR, then washed with PBS. At 24 h later, they were again washed with PBS. ATP liberation buffer was then added to the cell cultures. Luciferin and Luciferase were mixed together (50 μl, final volume) in a separate vial to which 50 μl of lysate (liberated ATP) from the cell cultures was then added. Luminescence was analyzed after a 30 s delay on a FluoroScan luminometer (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). An ATP standard curve prepared at the same time according to the manufacturer’s instructions was used to calculate the concentration of ATP in each sample.
Mitochondrial DNA quantification
To quantify mtDNA copy number, we measured the mitochondrial (mt) to nuclear (n) DNA ratio as described previously.60 Pyruvate kinase (Pklr) was used as a marker for nDNA and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (mt-Nd1) for mtDNA. Real-time PCR reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QuantiFast SYBR green PCR master mix; Qiagen, 204052), and thermal cycling was performed in a Rotor gene 6000 instrument (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The mtDNA content was normalized to the nucleic DNA content. The primer pairs used for PCR are listed in Table. S1.
Mitochondrial membrane potential measurements
The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) of intact cells was measured as described previously,61 with modifications. Cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized. The protein concentration of cells was adjusted to 0.2 mg/ml in DMEM without phenol red (Life Technologies-Invitrogen), FBS, and antibiotics. TMRE (tetramethylrhodamine, ethyl ester; 200 nM, Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, T669) was added to the cell suspension. Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. ΔΨm was measured by flow cytometry, and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software. TMRE fluorescence was measured using the FL2 channel (582 nm).
Mitochondrial mass determination and visualization of mitochondria in living cells
Mitochondrial mass was measured using fluorescence levels upon staining with MitoTracker Green FM (Invitrogen, M7514) at 100 nM at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, cells were washed once in PBS and promptly used for flow cytometry. The percentage and mean fluorescence intensity level of the mass were calculated for each sample.
To visualize the mitochondria, mitochondrial marker TOMM20 at 100 nM was used, adding the dye with DMEM media at 37 °C for 30 min. Next, the cover glasses were washed twice with PBS and directly acquired with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 710; Zeiss). The images were evaluated as best-focus intensity projections.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT/real-time PCR
For semiquantitative RT-PCR, total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen, 15596018), and cDNA synthesis was performed using an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, 18080200) as described previously.33 Using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, 170-8880), we performed quantitative analysis of mRNA expression using a Veriti 96-well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems). PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 30 μl containing 2 μl of cDNA and 10 pM primers (Invitrogen). The PCR amplification protocol consisted of an initial incubation step for 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at 55 °C, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. PCR products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels and were stained with ethidium bromide. The relative quantitative real-time mRNA expression was determined using the SYBR green PCR master mix (Qiagen, 204072) and Rotor gene 6000 (Qiagen). Expression levels of genes were calculated by the 2∆∆Ct method using Gapdh as an internal control gene. Data were analyzed using an unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test, and the results were expressed as relative fold changes. The primer pairs used for PCR are listed in Table. S1.
Luciferase assays
Raw264.7 or THP-1 cells were transiently transfected with a luciferase gene under the control of the pGL3 promoter-containing NFKB1 sites, or the CEBPB transcription recognition sequences were used. We also used the pRL vector expressing a Renilla luciferase gene (Promega, E2241) for constitutive protein expression, and the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, E1910) substrate.
For luciferase reporter gene assays, human ATG5, BECN1, and ATG7 promoter constructs were used. The human ATG5 and BECN1 promoter constructs were described previously.33 For the human ATG7 promoter construct, a 4463-bp fragment upstream of the predicted transcription start site of the human ATG7 gene was generated by PCR amplification from human genomic DNA using the sense primer 5′-GCACGCGTAG TTTGAGAGGG CAACGG CAGGAGAG-3′ and antisense primer (ATG7-RP) 5′-GGAAGATCTG CAGGTGTGGA GAGC CAGGAGATGA GA-3′. The 5′-promoter deletion construct (2122-bp fragment) was generated using the antisense primer AGT7-RP and the sense primer 5′-GCACGCGTTG AGGTGAAGGT GGGAGGATCA CTTGAGTC-3′. These fragments were digested with Mlu I and Bgl II and cloned upstream of the luciferase gene in the pGL3-Basic reporter vector (Promega). Searches for putative DNA binding sites for transcription factors in the human ATG7 5′-flanking region sequences were conducted using TFSEARCH (http://www.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html) and MOTIF Search (http://motif.genome.jp).
A schematic representation of the generation of human ATG5, BECN1, and ATG7 promoter-reporter constructs is shown in Figure 6C. The reporter gene assay was performed as described previously.33 The luciferase reporter vector controlled by a synthetic promoter containing direct repeats of the transcription recognition sequences for the CEBPB was obtained from Stratagene. Raw264.7 or THP-1 cells were plated in 6-well culture plates and transfected with a firefly reporter vector (4.0 μg) and pRL vector expressing the Renilla luciferase gene (0.1 μg), together with the indicated expression plasmids (4.0 μg) using the Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 2 d of transfection, cells were lysed in Passive Reporter Lysis Buffer (Promega, E1910), and luciferase activity was measured. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. Each transfection was performed in triplicate, and 3 independent experiments were conducted.
Statistical analyses
For statistical analysis, data obtained from independent experiments (means ± standard deviation [SD]) were analyzed using a 2-tailed Student t test. Differences were deemed to be significant at a P value less than 0.05. For Drosophila survival, data were graphed and analyzed using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA USA). The 95% confidence intervals were computed as follows: 1.96× standard error in each direction. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
Supplementary Material
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- 3-MA
3-methyladenine
- ACACA/B
acetyl-CoA carboxylase
- AICAR
AMP-mimetic 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-D-ribofuranoside
- AMP
adenosine monophosphate
- AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase
- Atg
autophagy-related
- ATP
adenosine 5′-triphosphate
- BCG
Mycobacterium bovis BCG
- Baf-A
bafilomycin A1
- BMDMs
bone marrow-derived macrophages
- CEBPB
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), beta
- ΔΨm
mitochondrial membrane potential
- MFI
mean fluorescence intensities
- MOI
multiplicity of infection
- Mtb
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv
- MTOR
mechanistic target of rapamycin
- NFE2L
nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like
- OXPHOS
oxidative phosphorylation
- PPARGC1A
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1alpha
- sh
shRNA
- TMRE
tetramethylrhodamine, ethyl ester
- ULK1
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgments
We thank to Dr R L Friedman (U of Arizona) for providing mycobacterial strains; Dr M Komatsu (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan) for providing Atg7-floxed mice (Atg7fl/fl, C57BL/6 background) mice; Dr T Yoshimori (Osaka University, Japan) for providing an mRFP–GFP tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 construct; Dr S-J Shin (Yonsei University, Korea) for providing ERFP-Mtb; Dr R L Modlin (U of California, Los Angeles) and Dr S-J Lee (Catholic University, Korea) for helpful discussion and critical reading of manuscript; Dr J Chung (Seoul National University) and Dr G-H Cha (Chungnam National University, Korea) for kind discussion for fly work; Dr S-B Han (Chungbuk National University, Korea) for assistance with confocal microscopy; D-M Shin, J-M Yuk, J-K Kim (Chungnam National University, Korea), Dr J-C Lee (Samsung Medical Center, Korea), and D-H Choi (Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Korea) for excellent technical assistance. Finally, we thank all of E-K Jo’s lab members for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2007-0054932) at Chungnam National University, and by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (HI10C0573).
References
- 1.Deretic V, Levine B. . Autophagy, immunity, and microbial adaptations. Cell Host Microbe 2009; 5:527 - 49; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.016; PMID: 19527881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. . Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 2011; 469:323 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature09782; PMID: 21248839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rohde K, Yates RM, Purdy GE, Russell DG. . Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the environment within the phagosome. Immunol Rev 2007; 219:37 - 54; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00547.x; PMID: 17850480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deretic V, Singh S, Master S, Harris J, Roberts E, Kyei G, Davis A, de Haro S, Naylor J, Lee HH, et al. . Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibition of phagolysosome biogenesis and autophagy as a host defence mechanism. Cell Microbiol 2006; 8:719 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00705.x; PMID: 16611222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jo EK. . Autophagy as an innate defense against mycobacteria. Pathog Dis 2013; 67:108 - 18; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/2049-632X.12023; PMID: 23620156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fabri M, Realegeno SE, Jo EK, Modlin RL. . Role of autophagy in the host response to microbial infection and potential for therapy. Curr Opin Immunol 2011; 23:65 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.010; PMID: 21071195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oakhill JS, Steel R, Chen ZP, Scott JW, Ling N, Tam S, Kemp BE. . AMPK is a direct adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Science 2011; 332:1433 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1200094; PMID: 21680840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. . AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13:251 - 62; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm3311; PMID: 22436748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hardie DG. . AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinases: conserved guardians of cellular energy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:774 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2249; PMID: 17712357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Høyer-Hansen M, Jäättelä M. . AMP-activated protein kinase: a universal regulator of autophagy?. Autophagy 2007; 3:381 - 3; PMID: 17457036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim JJ, Lee HM, Shin DM, Kim W, Yuk JM, Jin HS, Lee SH, Cha GH, Kim JM, Lee ZW, et al. . Host cell autophagy activated by antibiotics is required for their effective antimycobacterial drug action. Cell Host Microbe 2012; 11:457 - 68; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.008; PMID: 22607799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alers S, Löffler AS, Wesselborg S, Stork B. . Role of AMPK-mTOR-Ulk1/2 in the regulation of autophagy: cross talk, shortcuts, and feedbacks. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:2 - 11; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.06159-11; PMID: 22025673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scarpulla RC. . Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1813:1269 - 78; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.09.019; PMID: 20933024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tadaishi M, Miura S, Kai Y, Kawasaki E, Koshinaka K, Kawanaka K, Nagata J, Oishi Y, Ezaki O. . Effect of exercise intensity and AICAR on isoform-specific expressions of murine skeletal muscle PGC-1α mRNA: a role of β₂-adrenergic receptor activation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2011; 300:E341 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1152/ajpendo.00400.2010; PMID: 21098736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Viscomi C, Bottani E, Civiletto G, Cerutti R, Moggio M, Fagiolari G, Schon EA, Lamperti C, Zeviani M. . In vivo correction of COX deficiency by activation of the AMPK/PGC-1α axis. Cell Metab 2011; 14:80 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.011; PMID: 21723506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fujii N, Jessen N, Goodyear LJ. . AMP-activated protein kinase and the regulation of glucose transport. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 291:E867 - 77; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1152/ajpendo.00207.2006; PMID: 16822958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Green AS, Chapuis N, Lacombe C, Mayeux P, Bouscary D, Tamburini J. . LKB1/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in hematological malignancies: from metabolism to cancer cell biology. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:2115 - 20; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/cc.10.13.16244; PMID: 21572254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. . Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 2010; 140:313 - 26; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028; PMID: 20144757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stein SC, Woods A, Jones NA, Davison MD, Carling D. . The regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by phosphorylation. Biochem J 2000; 345:437 - 43; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1042/0264-6021:3450437; PMID: 10642499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang CS, Song CH, Lee JS, Jung SB, Oh JH, Park J, Kim HJ, Park JK, Paik TH, Jo EK. . Intracellular network of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, mammalian target of the rapamycin/70 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase 1, and mitogen-activated protein kinases pathways for regulating mycobacteria-induced IL-23 expression in human macrophages. Cell Microbiol 2006; 8:1158 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00699.x; PMID: 16819968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Egan D, Kim J, Shaw RJ, Guan KL. . The autophagy initiating kinase ULK1 is regulated via opposing phosphorylation by AMPK and mTOR. Autophagy 2011; 7:643 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/auto.7.6.15123; PMID: 21460621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. . AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:132 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2152; PMID: 21258367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gaidhu MP, Frontini A, Hung S, Pistor K, Cinti S, Ceddia RB. . Chronic AMP-kinase activation with AICAR reduces adiposity by remodeling adipocyte metabolism and increasing leptin sensitivity. J Lipid Res 2011; 52:1702 - 11; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1194/jlr.M015354; PMID: 21737753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leick L, Fentz J, Biensø RS, Knudsen JG, Jeppesen J, Kiens B, Wojtaszewski JF, Pilegaard H. . PGC-1α is required for AICAR-induced expression of GLUT4 and mitochondrial proteins in mouse skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 299:E456 - 65; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1152/ajpendo.00648.2009; PMID: 20628026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kang C, Li Ji L. . Role of PGC-1α signaling in skeletal muscle health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1271:110 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06738.x; PMID: 23050972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zong H, Ren JM, Young LH, Pypaert M, Mu J, Birnbaum MJ, Shulman GI. . AMP kinase is required for mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle in response to chronic energy deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:15983 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.252625599; PMID: 12444247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kusner DJ, Adams J. . ATP-induced killing of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis within human macrophages requires phospholipase D. J Immunol 2000; 164:379 - 88; PMID: 10605033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fairbairn IP, Stober CB, Kumararatne DS, Lammas DA. . ATP-mediated killing of intracellular mycobacteria by macrophages is a P2X(7)-dependent process inducing bacterial death by phagosome-lysosome fusion. J Immunol 2001; 167:3300 - 7; PMID: 11544318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dionne MS, Ghori N, Schneider DS. . Drosophila melanogaster is a genetically tractable model host for Mycobacterium marinum.. Infect Immun 2003; 71:3540 - 50; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3540-3550.2003; PMID: 12761139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tiefenböck SK, Baltzer C, Egli NA, Frei C. . The Drosophila PGC-1 homologue Spargel coordinates mitochondrial activity to insulin signalling. EMBO J 2010; 29:171 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/emboj.2009.330; PMID: 19910925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yoshimori T, Noda T. . Toward unraveling membrane biogenesis in mammalian autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:401 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.010; PMID: 18472412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Virgin HW, Levine B. . Autophagy genes in immunity. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:461 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ni.1726; PMID: 19381141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yuk JM, Shin DM, Lee HM, Yang CS, Jin HS, Kim KK, Lee ZW, Lee SH, Kim JM, Jo EK. . Vitamin D3 induces autophagy in human monocytes/macrophages via cathelicidin. Cell Host Microbe 2009; 6:231 - 43; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.004; PMID: 19748465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lanner JT, Georgiou DK, Dagnino-Acosta A, Ainbinder A, Cheng Q, Joshi AD, Chen Z, Yarotskyy V, Oakes JM, Lee CS, et al. . AICAR prevents heat-induced sudden death in RyR1 mutant mice independent of AMPK activation. Nat Med 2012; 18:244 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nm.2598; PMID: 22231556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shahnazari S, Brumell JH. . Mechanisms and consequences of bacterial targeting by the autophagy pathway. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14:68 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mib.2010.11.001; PMID: 21112809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lage R, Diéguez C, Vidal-Puig A, López M. . AMPK: a metabolic gauge regulating whole-body energy homeostasis. Trends Mol Med 2008; 14:539 - 49; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.09.007; PMID: 18977694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shin DM, Yuk JM, Lee HM, Lee SH, Son JW, Harding CV, Kim JM, Modlin RL, Jo EK. . Mycobacterial lipoprotein activates autophagy via TLR2/1/CD14 and a functional vitamin D receptor signalling. Cell Microbiol 2010; 12:1648 - 65; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01497.x; PMID: 20560977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Egan DF, Shackelford DB, Mihaylova MM, Gelino S, Kohnz RA, Mair W, Vasquez DS, Joshi A, Gwinn DM, Taylor R, et al. . Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science 2011; 331:456 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1196371; PMID: 21205641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zullo AJ, Lee S. . Mycobacterial induction of autophagy varies by species and occurs independently of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:12668 - 78; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M111.320135; PMID: 22275355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V. . Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell 2004; 119:753 - 66; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038; PMID: 15607973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gomes LC, Di Benedetto G, Scorrano L. . During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:589 - 98; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2220; PMID: 21478857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rambold AS, Kostelecky B, Elia N, Lippincott-Schwartz J. . Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:10190 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1107402108; PMID: 21646527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sonoda J, Laganière J, Mehl IR, Barish GD, Chong LW, Li X, Scheffler IE, Mock DC, Bataille AR, Robert F, et al. . Nuclear receptor ERR alpha and coactivator PGC-1 beta are effectors of IFN-gamma-induced host defense. Genes Dev 2007; 21:1909 - 20; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.1553007; PMID: 17671090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Piantadosi CA, Suliman HB. . Transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis and its interface with inflammatory processes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1820:532 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.01.003; PMID: 22265687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dionne MS, Pham LN, Shirasu-Hiza M, Schneider DS. . Akt and FOXO dysregulation contribute to infection-induced wasting in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1977 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.052; PMID: 17055976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Opota O, Vallet-Gély I, Vincentelli R, Kellenberger C, Iacovache I, Gonzalez MR, Roussel A, van der Goot FG, Lemaitre B. . Monalysin, a novel ß-pore-forming toxin from the Drosophila pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila, contributes to host intestinal damage and lethality. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7:e1002259; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002259; PMID: 21980286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chambers MC, Song KH, Schneider DS. . Listeria monocytogenes infection causes metabolic shifts in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2012; 7:e50679; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0050679; PMID: 23272066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Polager S, Ofir M, Ginsberg D. . E2F1 regulates autophagy and the transcription of autophagy genes. Oncogene 2008; 27:4860 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/onc.2008.117; PMID: 18408756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Copetti T, Bertoli C, Dalla E, Demarchi F, Schneider C. . p65/RelA modulates BECN1 transcription and autophagy. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:2594 - 608; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.01396-08; PMID: 19289499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chauhan S, Goodwin JG, Chauhan S, Manyam G, Wang J, Kamat AM, Boyd DD. . ZKSCAN3 is a master transcriptional repressor of autophagy. Mol Cell 2013; 50:16 - 28; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.024; PMID: 23434374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Karamanlidis G, Karamitri A, Docherty K, Hazlerigg DG, Lomax MA. . C/EBPbeta reprograms white 3T3-L1 preadipocytes to a Brown adipocyte pattern of gene expression. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:24660 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M703101200; PMID: 17584738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ma D, Panda S, Lin JD. . Temporal orchestration of circadian autophagy rhythm by C/EBPβ. EMBO J 2011; 30:4642 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/emboj.2011.322; PMID: 21897364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Twig G, Hyde B, Shirihai OS. . Mitochondrial fusion, fission and autophagy as a quality control axis: the bioenergetic view. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1777:1092 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.05.001; PMID: 18519024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang Y, Qi H, Taylor R, Xu W, Liu LF, Jin S. . The role of autophagy in mitochondria maintenance: characterization of mitochondrial functions in autophagy-deficient S. cerevisiae strains. Autophagy 2007; 3:337 - 46; PMID: 17404498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Castillo EF, Dekonenko A, Arko-Mensah J, Mandell MA, Dupont N, Jiang S, Delgado-Vargas M, Timmins GS, Bhattacharya D, Yang H, et al. . Autophagy protects against active tuberculosis by suppressing bacterial burden and inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:E3168 - 76; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1210500109; PMID: 23093667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pilli M, Arko-Mensah J, Ponpuak M, Roberts E, Master S, Mandell MA, Dupont N, Ornatowski W, Jiang S, Bradfute SB, et al. . TBK-1 promotes autophagy-mediated antimicrobial defense by controlling autophagosome maturation. Immunity 2012; 37:223 - 34; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.015; PMID: 22921120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nakahira K, Haspel JA, Rathinam VA, Lee SJ, Dolinay T, Lam HC, Englert JA, Rabinovitch M, Cernadas M, Kim HP, et al. . Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat Immunol 2011; 12:222 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ni.1980; PMID: 21151103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jung HS, Chung KW, Won Kim J, Kim J, Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Nguyen YH, Kang TM, Yoon KH, Kim JW, et al. . Loss of autophagy diminishes pancreatic beta cell mass and function with resultant hyperglycemia. Cell Metab 2008; 8:318 - 24; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.013; PMID: 18840362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang CS, Shin DM, Kim KH, Lee ZW, Lee CH, Park SG, Bae YS, Jo EK. . NADPH oxidase 2 interaction with TLR2 is required for efficient innate immune responses to mycobacteria via cathelicidin expression. J Immunol 2009; 182:3696 - 705; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4049/jimmunol.0802217; PMID: 19265148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jiang Z, Bao Q, Sun L, Huang X, Wang T, Zhang S, Li H, Zhang L. . Possible role of mtDNA depletion and respiratory chain defects in aristolochic acid I-induced acute nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 266:198 - 203; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.taap.2012.07.008; PMID: 22820421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bauerfeld CP, Rastogi R, Pirockinaite G, Lee I, Hüttemann M, Monks B, Birnbaum MJ, Franchi L, Nuñez G, Samavati L. . TLR4-mediated AKT activation is MyD88/TRIF dependent and critical for induction of oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial transcription factor A in murine macrophages. J Immunol 2012; 188:2847 - 57; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4049/jimmunol.1102157; PMID: 22312125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







