Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 12;22:44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.12.010

Table 1.

Summary of methods and results from studies assessing birth prevalence of congenital CMV infection in developing countries

First author and year of publication Country and time period Maternal seroprevalence Newborn screening Number of newborns with congenital CMV (%)

Clinical specimens Laboratory methods Tested Infected Symptomatic

n Prevalence, % (95% CI)
Schopfer 197819 Ivory Coast - 100% Urine Culture 2032 28 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0 (0)
van der Sande 200720 Gambiaa 2002–2005 100%b Urine PCR 741 40 5.4 (4.0–7.3) 3 (8)
Sohn 199221 Korea 1989–1991 96%b Urine and cord blood Culture 514 6 1.2 (0.5–2.6) 0 (0)
Tsai 199622 Taiwana - 90% Urine Culture, PCR 1000 18 1.8 (1.1–2.8) 2 (11)
Zhang 200710 China 1997–2000 92–99% Urine PCR 1159 71 6.1 (4.9–7.7) 17 (24)
Dar 200823 India - 99%b Saliva, urine (C) PCR 423 9 2.1 (1.1–4.0) 1 (11)
Luchsinger 199624 Chile 1989–1994 98% Urine and saliva Culture, PCR 658 12 1.8 (1.0–3.2) 0 (0)
Weirich 199725 Brazil 1994–1995 90%b Saliva Culture 663 21 3.2 (2.1–4.8) 6 (29)
Yamamoto 201126 Brazil 2003–2009 96% Urine and/or saliva PCR, culturec 12 195 121 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 12 (10)
Noyola 200327 Mexicoa 2001 92% Saliva Culture 560 5 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 0 (0)
Estripeaut 200728 Panama 2003–2004 84%b Urine PCR 317 2 0.6 (0.2–2.5) 1 (50)

CMV, cytomegalovirus; CI, confidence interval.

a

Studies that were conducted in well-baby nurseries or excluded severely ill newborns.

b

Mothers tested as part of the study.

c

Culture was used as confirmatory test.