Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008 Aug 19;5(11):634–644. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1204

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Shortcomings of the ellipsoid assumption used in the diameter method of measuring a change in glioma size. (A) T1 contrast-enhanced MRI scan of a 55-year-old female with recurrent glioblastoma, before therapy initiation. (B) A scan from the same individual 26 days later. Note that the lesion has not only decreased in size but also in intensity of enhancement. According to the diameter-based cross-sectional area technique, the lesion has decreased to 72% of its original size, and would be classified in the stable disease category. On the basis of the volume of enhancement, the lesion is 35% of its original size, and would be classified as a partial response.