Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 23;594(1):169–188. doi: 10.1113/JP270184

Table 3.

Statistics of correlation analyses between the experience‐related differences in the M1 activity and connectivity during the untrained‐hand's performance

The left M1, contralateral to the performing (untrained) hand
ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC
M1 – M1 left‐M1 – left‐SMA left‐M1 – right‐SMA left‐M1 – left‐PMd left‐M1 – right‐PMd
ΔCV‐Act within the ‘untrained’ (left) M1 r = 0.39 r = −0.08 r = 0.06 r = 0.01 r = −0.02
P = 0.16 P = 0.77 P = 0.83 P = 0.97 P = 0.96
The right M1, ipsilateral to the performing (untrained) hand
ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC ΔCC
M1 – M1 right‐M1 – right‐SMA right ‐M1 – left ‐SMA right ‐M1 – right ‐PMd right ‐M1 – left ‐PMd
ΔCV‐Act within the ‘trained’ (left) M1 r = 0.70 r = 0.27 r = 0.44 r = 0.33 r = 0.67
P = 0.01 P = 0.34 P = 0.11 P = 0.23 P < 0.01
p cor = 0.06 P cor < 0.05

ΔCV‐Act, experience‐related differences in the magnitude of activity; ΔCC, experience‐related differences in the strength of functional connectivity; P cor, values corrected for multiple tests using Bonferroni adjustments.