Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1973 Dec;35(12):1240–1244. doi: 10.1136/hrt.35.12.1240

Discrepancies between electrocardiographic and enzyme evidence of myocardial infarction.

P Marrott, M P Chopra, R W Portal, C P Aber
PMCID: PMC458788  PMID: 4271414

Full text

PDF
1240

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chapman B. L. Correlation of mortality rate and serum enzymes in myocardial infarction. Test of efficiency of coronary care. Br Heart J. 1971 Sep;33(5):643–646. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.5.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DIAZ-RIVERA R. S., GARCIA-PALMIERI M. R., MARCHAND E. J., RODRIGUEZ H. F., SANTIAGO-STEVENSON D. The significance of giant negative T waves in coronary artery disease; report of five cases. Am Heart J. 1956 Oct;52(4):521–532. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(56)90042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ELLIOTT B. A., WILKINSON J. H. Serum "alpha-hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase" in myocardial infarction and in liver disease. Lancet. 1961 Apr 1;1(7179):698–699. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)91724-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fletcher E., Morton P., Murtagh G. Electrocardiographic triad of high lateral infarction. Br Heart J. 1968 Nov;30(6):870–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GEORAS C. S., DAHLQUIST E., CUTTS F. B. Subendocardial infarction. Correlation of clinical, electrocardiographic, and pathologic data in 17 cases. Arch Intern Med. 1963 Apr;111:488–497. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1963.03620280088014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg D. M., Winfield D. A. Diagnostic accuracy of serum enzyme assays for myocardial infarction in a general hospital population. Br Heart J. 1972 Jun;34(6):597–604. doi: 10.1136/hrt.34.6.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kibe O., Nilsson N. J. Observations on the diagnostic and prognostic value of some enzyme tests in myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand. 1967 Nov;182(5):597–610. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1967.tb10886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEVINE H. D., FORD R. V. Subendocardial infarction; report of six cases and critical survey of the literature. Circulation. 1950 Feb;1(2):246–263. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.1.2.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PERLOFF J. K. THE RECOGNITION OF STRICTLY POSTERIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION BY CONVENTIONAL SCALAR ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY. Circulation. 1964 Nov;30:706–718. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.30.5.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PRINZMETAL M., SHAW C. M., Jr, MAXWELL M. H., FLAMM E. J., GOLDMAN A., KIMURA N., RAKITA L., BORDUAS J. L., ROTHMAN S., KENNAMER R. Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. VI. The depolarization complex in pure subendocardial infarction; role of the subendocardial region in the normal electrocardiogram. Am J Med. 1954 Apr;16(4):469–489. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(54)90363-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WOODS J. D., LAURIE W., SMITH W. G. The reliability of the electrocardiogram in myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1963 Aug 10;2(7302):265–269. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)90170-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES