Table 3.
Logistic regression results for the relationship between socioeconomic variables, personal characteristics, and following the intervention recommendation within the complete sample (N=1586).
| Predictor | β | P | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age (cont) | 0.04 | <.001 | 1.04 (1.02-1.05) | |
| Gender (ref=female) | 0.34 | .02 | 1.40 (1.08-1.80) | |
| Diseases (ref=healthy) | –0.18 | .71 | 0.94 (0.67-1.31) | |
| Country of birth (ref=not NL) | –0.26 | .40 | 0.77 (0.42-1.41) | |
| Family status (ref=in relationship) | 0.01 | .97 | 1.0 (0.67-1.46) | |
| Household (cont) | –0.09 | .07 | 0.91 (0.82-1.01) | |
| Income (ref=high) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
.67 |
|
|
|
Middle | –0.16 | .47 | 0.86 (0.56-1.31) |
|
|
High | 0.01 | .98 | 1.06 (0.74-1.34) |
| Work situation (ref=unemployed) | –0.15 | .35 | 0.86 (0.62-1.19) | |
| Education (ref=high) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
.78 |
|
|
|
Middle | 0.06 | .79 | 1.06 (0.68-1.67) |
|
|
High | 0.08 | .58 | 1.08 (0.82-1.43) |
| QOL (cont) | –0.04 | .002 | 0.96 (0.93-0.98) | |
| Module recommendation (cont) | –1.59 | <.001 | 0.20 (0.17-0.24) | |
a Cont=continuous; ref=reference group for categorical variables.