Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 May 19;18(6):1914–1921. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0980

Table 1.

Sample population characteristics

Obtained from
Saint Louis University*
University of Michigan*
Disease diagnosis HCC† Cirrhosis † P HCC† Cirrhosis† P
Number 65 32 N/A 99 81
Etiology% (HBV/HCV/crypto/alcohol/other)‡ 14/52/6/20/8 0/100/0/0/0 <0.0001 11/51/24/10/4 5/48/20/18/9 0.1405
Age (mean ± SD) 58.04 ± 11 50 ± 8 <0.0001 58.6 ± 12 58 ± 3 0.3165
Ethnicity (non-Hispanic White/African-American/Hispanic/Asian) N/A N/A N/A 86/8/4/2 81/11/6/2 0.7956
Gender (M:F)% 71:29 84:16 0.4079 75/25 60/40 0.053
MELD score (mean ± SD) 11.8 ± 5 NA N/A 10.3 ± 4 9 ± 2 0.0026
Child class (A/B/C) or NA%§ 52:29:9:10 88:8:4:0 <0.0001 48/42/10/0 40/54/6/0 0.1992
Tumor stage (I/II/III/IV)%∥ 26:48:12:14 NA N/A 21/40/26/13 NA N/A

Abbreviations: MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; N/A, not available.

*

Samples were provided coded from Saint Louis University Medical School or from the University of Michigan. See text for more details.

†

Disease diagnosis was determined by MRI or by liver biopsy.

‡

For etiology: crypto, cryptogenic liver disease; alcohol, alcohol-induced liver disease; other, liver disease of unknown origin.

§

The percentage of patients with each Child-Pugh score is given as a percentage in each group.

∥

Tumor staging was determined using the United Network of Organ Sharing–modified tumor-node-metastasis staging system for HCC. The percentage of patients within each stage is given. Patient’s characteristics were analyzed through the use of χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, or Welch’s approximate t test as appropriate. All test were two sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.