Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 4;20(21):5558–5569. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1138

Galectin-1 mediates radiation-related lymphopenia and attenuates NSCLC radiation response

Peiwen Kuo 1, Scott V Bratman 1, David B Shultz 1, Rie von Eyben 1, Cato Chan 1, Ziwei Wang 2, Carmen Say 1, Aparna Gupta 1, Bill W Loo Jr 1, Amato J Giaccia 1, Albert C Koong 1, Maximilian Diehn 1, Quynh-Thu Le 1
PMCID: PMC4216761  NIHMSID: NIHMS626170  PMID: 25189484

Abstract

Purpose

Radiotherapy (RT) can result in lymphopenia, which has been linked to poorer survival. Here, we test the hypothesis that RT-induced lymphopenia is mediated by a tumor-secreted factor, Galectin-1 (Gal-1), which possesses T-cell pro-apoptotic activities.

Experimental Design

Matched Gal-1 wildtype or null mice were implanted with Lewis Lung carcinoma (LLC-1) that either expressed Gal-1 or had Gal-1 stably down-regulated. Tumors were irradiated locally and circulating Gal-1 and T-cells were measured. Tumor growth, lung metastasis, intratumoral T-cell apoptosis, and microvessel density count were quantified. Thiodigalatoside (TDG), a Gal-1 inhibitor, was used to inhibit Gal-1 function in another group of mice to validate the observations noted with Gal-1 down-regulation. Lymphocyte counts, survival and plasma Gal-1 were analyzed in cohorts of RT-treated lung (NSCLC) and head and neck cancer patients.

Results

LLC irradiation increased Gal-1 secretion and decreased circulating T-cells in mice, regardless of host Gal-1 expression. Inhibition of tumor Gal-1 with either shRNA or TDG ablated RT-induced lymphopenia. Irradiated shGal-1 tumors showed significantly less intratumoral CD8+ T-cell apoptosis and microvessel density, which led to marked tumor growth delay and reduced lung metastasis compared to controls. Similar observations were made after TDG treatment. RT-induced lymphopenia was associated with poorer overall survival in NSCLC patients treated with hypofractionated RT. Plasma Gal-1 increased while T-cell decreased after radiation in another group of patients.

Conclusions

RT-related systemic lymphopenia appeared to be mediated by RT-induced tumor Gal-1 secretion that could lead to tumor progression through intratumoral immune suppression and enhanced angiogenesis.

Keywords: NSCLC, Galectin-1, radiation, lymphopenia, tumorgenesis, HNC

INTRODUCTION

Radiation (RT)-related lymphopenia is a persistent occurrence that has been frequently observed with radiation therapy to different sites including brain, thorax, abdomen and pelvis (1-5). More importantly, RT-induced lymphopenia has been shown to be a negative prognostic factor in various cancers including high-grade glioma, sarcomas, and carcinomas of the lung, colon, breast and pancreas (1, 2, 4, 6). The causes of RT-induced lymphopenia and its association with poor prognosis are largely unknown.

Galectin-1 is the prototype member of the Galectin superfamily, characterized by high affinity binding to β-galactosides through a well-conserved carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD). In cancer, Gal-1 also plays a critical role in altering the fate and phenotype of T cells to suppress their anti-tumor functions and create an immune privileged tumor microenvironment, which are well documented in melanoma, lymphoma, lung and breast cancer syngeneic models (7-10). Importantly, tumor rejection mediated by Gal-1 inhibition requires intact CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunity (7). We have previously shown that Gal-1 promotes tumor growth and metastasis, in part, through intratumoral T cell modulation. Notably, tumor-derived Gal-1, as opposed to host, drives disease progression through mediating the apoptosis of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells within the tumor, stymieing anti-tumor immunity (9).

We hypothesized that Gal-1 may be a mediator of RT-induced lymphopenia and its poor prognosis. Using a syngeneic mouse tumor model, we show that tumor irradiation increases plasma Gal-1 and induces significant depletion of circulating T lymphocytes in a tumor-specific Gal-1 manner. This function was disrupted by Gal-1 knockdown or TDG. Gal-1 secretion from the tumor was associated with large tumor growth and development of spontaneous pulmonary metastasis. Tumor irradiation resulted in a small delay in tumor regrowth but no impact on lung metastasis, which improved significantly with either Gal-1 down regulation or inhibition. This was associated with more infiltrating intratumoral CD8+ T cells, less intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells apoptosis and lower microvessel density. Clinically, we noted that lymphopenia occurred in a cohort of early stage NSCLC patients treated with small-field, hypofractionated radiotherapy alone, and that a large decrease in lymphocytes was associated with reduced survival. Finally, circulating Gal-1 increased while T lymphocytes dropped in association with radiation in head and neck cancer patients. These data suggest that tumor Gal-1 secretion is a driver of RT-related lymphopenia and targeting Gal-1 is a novel and intriguing approach towards improving RT response in NSCLC.

Results

Gal-1's secretion is enhanced by radiation and induces T cell apoptosis in vitro

Gal-1 secretion increased significantly after RT in several different tumor cell lines, including two murine NSCLC cell lines. This increase of Gal-1 secretion was noted as early as three hours in LLC-1. Intracellular level of Gal-1 did not change, suggesting that the bulk of newly synthesized Gal-1 proteins were secreted after RT (Figure 1A). Similar to others (7, 9-11), we found that rGal-1 induced apoptosis of concanavalin A-activated lymphocytes isolated from mouse spleen in a dose dependent manner (Figure 1B). This effect was abrogated by a Gal-1 specific antibody (anti-Gal1) or Thiodigalactoside (TDG), a Gal-1 competitive inhibitor (Figure 1C) when T cells were exposed to Gal-1 containing conditioned media. In addition to T lymphocytes, rGal-1 can also cause apoptosis in CD19+ B cells (assessed by TUNEL) though to a lesser extent (data not shown). Gal-1 is expressed in memory B cells and has been shown to regulate apoptosis through Bcl2 signaling (11).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gal-1 is induced by radiation and mediates T cell apoptosis in vitro. (A) Immunoblots showing intracellular and secreted Gal-1 in LLC-1 and LKR13 mouse NSCLC cell lines at the indicated time points before and after exposure to ionizing radiation (6 Gy). Means ± SE are shown for each condition performed in triplicate. (B) Apoptosis of lymphocytes after treatment with recombinant Gal-1. The percentage of TUNEL-FITC positive, apoptotic lymphocytes after treatment with 500ng/ml, 5ug/ml and 10ug/ml recombinant Gal-1 for 48 hours is shown. (C) The percentage of apoptotic T lymphocytes after culturing for 48 h in LLC-1 scramble conditioned medium in RPMI (1:2 ratio) (~1.2ng/ml Gal-1) with IgG (10ug/ml), anti-Gal-1 antibody (10ug/ml) or TDG (100mM). Representative histograms at left. Means ± SE are graphed (N=3). Experiments were performed at least twice with similar results, *P<0.05.

Tumor secreted Gal-1 reduces circulating helper and cytotoxic T cells after tumor irradiation

On the basis that radiation enhances the secretion of Gal-1, which has pro-apoptotic function in T cells, we evaluated the role of Gal-1 in RT-related lymphopenia. To address this, we examined the levels of circulating Gal-1 and T lymphocytes in the following four host and LLC-1 tumor combinations in order to differentiate between host and tumor Gal-1 contribution to radiation-related lymphopenia: WT/Scr (both host and tumor expressed Gal-1), WT/shGal-1 (only host expressed Gal-1), Gal-1−/−/ Scr (only tumor expressed Gal-1) and Gal-1−/−/ shGal-1 (neither host nor tumor expressed Gal-1). Once tumors reached a volume of approximately 150mm3, 20 Gy of radiation was delivered in a single fraction at the tumor site (Supplementary Figure 1).

Local tumor irradiation significantly increased the level of circulating Gal-1 only in Gal-1 expressing tumors (~1.5 in WT host and ~2.9 Gal-1−/− host) in but not in Gal-1 down-regulated tumors (Figure 2A). These data indicated that RT increased Gal-1 secretion from the tumor that could be measured in the plasma. In parallel to the increase of plasma Gal-1, there was a significant decrease in circulating T cells in WT mice bearing Gal-1 secreting tumors (WT/Scr), 32.9% (P =0.026) for CD3+ mature T cells and 31.7% (P = 0.033) for CD3+8+ cytotoxic T cells, two weeks after tumor irradiation. There was also a decrease in CD4+ T helper cells but the reduction did not reach statistical significance (28.2%, P=0.09) (Figure 2, B-D). In contrast, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte levels did not decrease significantly after irradiation of shGal-1 tumors implanted in Gal-1 WT or Gal-1−/− mice (WT/shGal-1 and Gal-1−/− /shGal-1). Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease in the CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (29.4%, P = 0.02 and 34.4%, P = 0.02, respectively) but not CD4+ T cells (12.9%, P=0.48) in Gal-1−/− mice bearing Gal-1 secreting tumors (Gal−/−/Scr), suggesting that RT-related lymphopenia occurred independently of host Gal-1 status (Figure 2, B-D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Tumor secreted Gal-1 facilitates radiation-related T lymphopenia. Four different host/tumor mouse groups, WT/Scr, WT/shGal-1, Gal-1−/−/ Scr and Gal-1−/−/ shGal-1 and two different time points (before radiation (Pre IR) and two weeks after radiation (Post IR)) were used in experiments presented in Figures 3A-D. (A) ELISA quantification of plasma Gal-1 for each host/tumor group before and after RT (N= 5 to 6 mice per group). (B) The percentage of circulating total mature T cells (CD3+), (C) T helper cells (CD3+ CD4+) and (D) cytotoxic T cells (CD3+ CD8+) for each group before and after RT (N= 6 to 7 mice per group). (E) Terminal circulating CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in WT/Scr mice with or without tumor irradiation, showing that RT is important in causing a decrease in T lymphocytes (N=5 mice per group). (F) Terminal plasma Gal-1 ELISA from the mice in (E). Inhibition of Gal-1 by Thiodigalactoside (TDG) attenuates radiation-related T lymphopenia. (G) Percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ circulating T cells in mice treated with intratumoral TDG (120mg/kg) or PBS vehicle injections before and after 20Gy tumor radiation is graphed (N= 5 to 6 mice per group). Data represent the means ± SE, *P<0.05.

To ensure that the noted effect was due to Gal-1 secretion from RT rather than from Gal-1 secretion from growing tumors during the two weeks of observation, we also analyzed circulating T cells in WT mice, implanted with Gal-1 secreting tumors that were not irradiated and allowed to grow for two weeks after reaching approximately 150 mm3. Without tumor irradiation, there was a small decrease in the level of circulating CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (18.1%, 18.05% and 6.60%, respectively) but none of the changes reached statistical significance (Figure 2E). Similarly, day 28 terminal bleed from mice in Figure 2E showed a two-fold higher plasma Gal-1 level in the irradiated group compared to the non-irradiated mice, despite larger tumors in the non-irradiated group, suggesting that RT induced Gal-1 secretion into the blood (Figure 2F). These data suggested that Gal-1 containing tumors did release a low basal level of Gal-1 into the blood that caused a small drop in circulating lymphocytes, and that this effect was significantly augmented by tumor irradiation.

We also evaluated the effect of Gal-1 secretion on common lymphoid progenitors or nesting mature T cells in the bone marrow. There was no change in these cell populations with radiation and there was no change in Gal-1 expression on the surface of these cells (Supplementary Figure 2). To ensure that there was no difference in inherent sensitivity to radiation or rGal-1 between lymphocytes from WT and Gal-1−/− mice, we also tested these effects in vitro; no difference was noted between the two T cell populations (Supplementary Figure 3).

To corroborate our previous findings with the shGal-1 inhibition, we also evaluated the effect of inhibiting Gal-1 pharmacologically with the competitive inhibitor, TDG (Figure 2G). TDG is a naturally occurring thioglycoside that is highly stable in vivo, and binds to the carbohydrate recognition domain of Gal-1, thereby preventing ligand interactions. We performed intratumoral TDG injections in Gal-1 WT mice implanted with LLC-1 scramble tumors to inhibit Gal-1 and examined changes in the abundance of circulating CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes before and after tumor irradiation. TDG treatment before RT resulted in a small, non-significant increase of total, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, suggesting that basal Gal-1 release from the tumor caused some circulating T cell death, and this was blocked by TDG injection. More importantly, radiation resulted in a significant drop of circulating CD3+ (51.2%, P=0.006), CD4+ (42.2%, P=0.005) and CD8+ (43.5%, P=0.008) lymphocytes, which was rescued with TDG treatment. Altogether, our data suggest that Gal-1 was secreted into the blood by the tumor after radiation, resulting in lymphopenia that could be abrogated by Gal-1 inhibition.

Gal-1 modulates tumor radiation response through the modulation of tumor T cell apoptosis and angiogenesis

In light of our observation that Gal-1 mediates RT-related lymphopenia, which is associated with worse outcomes in the clinic, we hypothesized that Gal-1 reduced tumor response to RT and enhanced tumor metastasis and that these effects could be minimized with Gal-1 down regulation or inhibition. In vitro, Gal-1 down regulation in LKR-13 lung cancer cells moderately enhanced radiation cell kill under either normoxia or severe hypoxia, as assessed by clonogenic survival curves (Supplementary Figure 4, A and B). To investigate Gal-1 effect on tumor radiosensitivity in vivo, we implanted LLC-1 scramble and shGal-1 tumors in Gal-1 WT C57Bl/6 mice and irradiated the tumors with 20 Gy in a single fraction, after allowing the tumors to reach a volume of approximately 150 mm3. Tumor growth was monitored and upon sacrifice, lung metastases, intratumoral T cell infiltration and apoptosis, as well as, microvessel density count were quantified. As expected, either down regulation of Gal-1 alone or radiation alone resulted in similar decreases in tumor growth (Figure 3A). However, the combination of radiation and Gal-1 down regulation nearly abolished tumor growth (mean 1.16 ± 0.97 fold volume increase when normalized to tumor volume on day of irradiation) during the 2 weeks of observation (P=0.02) (Figure 3A). This observation was also made with LKR13 tumors in vivo (Supplementary Figure 4C). Radiation alone did not affect the number of spontaneous lung metastasis (Figure 3B). Down regulation of Gal-1 significantly decreased the number of lung metastases, which was further reduced with the addition of local field radiotherapy (P<0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gal-1 mediates tumor radiation response in vitro and in vivo and promotes lung metastases. (A)Tumor growth curves for Gal-1 WT C57Bl/6 mice implanted with scramble (Scr) or Gal-1 knockdown LLC-1 tumor cells (shGal-1) with and without radiation. 20Gy of ionizing radiation was delivered in a single fraction (bolt). Tumor volumes were normalized to size on day of radiation (N=7 to 10 mice per group, P= 0.02). (B) Spontaneous metastases quantified from hematoxylin and eosin stained lungs from mice in (A) (P<0.05). Representative light microscopy images at right (40x objective). (C) Tumor growth curves for Gal-1 WT mice implanted with scramble LLC-1 and treated with intratumoral TDG or PBS injection on the days indicated. Irradiated mice receiving PBS (PBS IR) and TDG (TDG IR) received a single dose of 20Gy ionizing radiation at the indicated time (bolt). Tumor volumes normalized to size on day of radiation (N= 5 mice per group, P= 0.05). (D) Lung metastases of mice from (C) is shown (P = 0.037). Data represent the means ± SE.

Similar results for tumor growth were observed when we inhibited Gal-1 with intratumoral TDG injection. TDG injection alone or radiation alone reduced tumor growth to a similar extent and the combination of radiation and TDG yielded the slowest growth rate (P=0.05)(Figure 3C). Again, tumor irradiation alone did not reduce lung metastases compared to the non-irradiated control (Figure 3D). Intratumoral TDG injection resulted in a non-significant reduction in the number of lung metastasis. However, the combination of TDG and radiation resulted in a significant decrease in lung metastases (approximately 40%) compared to control (P= 0.037).

Mechanistically, down regulation of Gal-1 increased CD8+ but not CD4+ T cell tumor infiltration (Figure 4, A and B). Gal-1 depletion combined with radiation increased tumor infiltration by CD8+ T cells even further (Figure 4B). Notably, Gal-1 knockdown reduced apoptosis of both intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets (Figure 4C). Gal-1 inhibition by knockdown and TDG also reduced tumor angiogenesis, which was further attenuated when combined with radiation (Figure 4, D and E).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Gal-1 induces intratumoral T cell apoptosis and attenuates T cell infiltration and microvessel formation. (A) CD4+ T cell infiltration of scr and shGal-1 tumors, with or without radiation, quantified as counts per field of view (10 random fields at 200x magnification, scale bar=100um, n=5 tumors per group). (B) CD8+ T cell infiltration of scr and shGal-1 tumors, with or without radiation, quantified as counts per field of view (10 random fields at 200x magnification, scale bar=100um, n=5 tumors per group, P<0.05). (C and D) Percentage of TUNEL positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells within Scr and shGal-1 tumors, with or without radiation, is graphed and representative images are at right (scale bar=50um, n=5 tumors per group, P=0.01. (E) Microvessel density counts of CD31 stained tumors of the indicated Gal-1 status/treatment combinations (N=5 tumors per group, P<0.05). (F) Microvessel density counts of CD31 stained tumors collected from PBS and TDG treated mice, with and without radiation (N=5 mice per group, P<0.05). Representative images at right. Data represent means ± SE.

RT-related lymphopenia is associated with reduced survival in early stage NSCLC treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy

The study cohort consisted of 20 patients with stage I-II NSCLC treated definitively with small-field hypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (12) alone. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the patient characteristics. The majority of patients, 15 out of 20 (75%), experienced a drop in absolute lymphocyte count during the first year and the mean maximum decrease for the entire group was 0.4±0.22x103/ml. Figure 5A shows the mean absolute lymphocyte counts before (pre-SABR) and after SABR (post-SABR), when the counts were at their lowest within the first year. The decrease was statistically significant (P = 0.025). Univariate cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the degree of drop in absolute lymphocyte count (split by quartile) was associated with worse overall survival (OS, P=0.037, HR=1.148) (Figure 5B), disease free survival (DFS, P=0.033, HR=1.134) (Figure 5C), distant progression free survival (DPFS, P=0.023, HR=1.159) (Supplementary Figure 5A) and local progression free survival (LPFS, P=0.049, HR=1.129) (Supplementary Figure 5B). It was also associated with a trend for worse regional progression free survival (RPFS, P=0.056, HR=1.126) (Supplementary Figure 5C). These findings revealed that RT-related lymphopenia also occurred in SABR using very small fields in one to four fractions and was prognostic for tumor control and survival in early stage NSCLC.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Relationship between survival and the degree of radiation-mediated drop in lymphocytes counts in 20 patients with early stage NSCLC treated with SABR. Mean (± 95% CI) pre-radiation and post SABR absolute lymphocyte counts is graphed for the entire group (P=0.025). Survival curves based on Cox regression of (B) Overall (P=0.037) and (C) Disease Free (P=0.033) Survival, stratified by the maximum drop in absolute lymphocyte counts before and after radiotherapy. Patients were split by quartiles. The overall survival HR of 1.148 and Disease Free Survival HR of 1.134 indicate that at any specific time t, a patient with a 0.1 unit increase in the maximum drop in absolute lymphocyte count before and after RT will have an increased risk of 14.8% of death or 13.4% of experiencing progression or death. (D) In a separate group of NSCLC patients, plasma Gal-1 pre and post-SABR is graphed. (E) HNC plasma Gal-1 increase after treatment (RT combined with cisplatin or cetuximab) is graphed (N=24) (P=0.05). (F) Decrease in absolute lymphocytes after treatment in HNC is shown (N=24). Mean (±95% CI) is shown (P<0.001).

Since plasma samples from these 20 NSCLC patients were not available for Gal-1 measurement, we measured circulating Gal-1 and T lymphocytes in a group of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy with either concomitant cetuximab or cisplatin (N=24). Patient characteristics for this group are shown in Supplementary Table 2. We observed a significant decrease in lymphocyte count (0.88 ±0.18x103/ml, P<0.001) and increase in plasma Gal-1 (5.89±4.3 ng/ml, P=0.05) after treatment (Figure 5, D and E). The degree of RT-induced lymphopenia was not significantly different between HNC treated with RT combined with cisplatin or cetuximab (Supplementary Figure 5D). To date, we only noted three failures in the HNC patients with a median follow up of 11.2 months; such few number of events precludes accurate survival time analysis. However, there was a trend for larger lymphocyte drop (1.2 versus 0.8 x103/ml) and a higher rise in Gal-1 level (14.1 versus 4.7 ng/ml) in patients who failed compared to those who did not, although the difference did not reach statistical significance due to the small number of patients (Supplementary Figure 5E).

Our findings indicate that in addition to proangiogenic function, Gal-1-mediated intratumoral T cell apoptosis and peripheral T cell depletion, which increase after radiation, facilitate radiation resistance and poor prognosis with SABR treated NSCLC. Figure 6 summarizes our proposed mechanism.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Proposed mechanism for RT-induced Gal-1 secretion as a potential cause of the poor prognosis linked to RT-related lymphopenia. Radiation-related lymphopenia is associated with worse outcomes in SABR treated, early stage NSCLC patients. This may be due to tumor associated Gal-1 upregulation by radiation, leading to lower circulating T cells, intratumoral T cell viability and microvessel formation, which facilitate tumor growth.

DISCUSSION

Radiation, which is major treatment modality for solid tumors, is a modulator of the anti-tumor immune response; yet, its stimulatory activity can be counteracted by RT-induced lymphopenia, which is associated with worse treatment response. In this study, we identified Gal-1 as a mediator of RT-driven lymphopenia and attenuator of tumor radiation response. Targeting Gal-1 prevents intratumoral and systemic immunosuppression, supporting anti-tumor immune responses after RT.

The clinical impact of RT-induced lymphopenia has only been systematically studied recently. One possible mechanism for RT-related lymphopenia is direct irradiation of T lymphocytes as they enter radiation fields. The proportion of irradiated circulating lymphocytes increased with greater fractions and slower dose rates (20). On the other hand, direct irradiation-induced lymphocyte kill is unlikely responsible for lymphopenia observed in SABR-treated early-stage NSCLC. These patients receive hypofractionated therapy, which encompasses high dose delivered in a few fractions, limiting lymphocyte exposure to radiation as they circulate through the small treatment fields. Instead, in SABR-treated early-stage NSCLC, alternative mechanisms such as secreted cytokine(s) (with Gal-1 being of such cytokines) may drive this phenomenon.

Radiation-related lymphopenia is also often persistent, extending from months to years after radiotherapy (1-3, 13). This cannot be explained by radiation destruction of the bone marrow when treatment sites do not encompass active marrow. The half-lives of CD4+ (87 days), CD8+ T cells (77 days) (14) and Gal-1 (20 hours) (15) are not long enough explain persistent lymphopenia exceeding a year after radiation (1, 3, 13). Our assessment of the bone marrow niche also revealed that RT-induced tumor Gal-1 secretion did not affect common lymphoid progenitors or nesting mature T cells. Interestingly, a study conducted by Ellsworth and colleagues revealed that in high-grade glioma patients treated with RT and temozolomide, patients with RT-related lymphopenia had lower levels of IL-7, a cytokine involved in T cell homeostatic proliferation, and IL-15, which is responsible for CD8+ T cell survival. The reduction of these cytokines prevented a compensatory response to treatment-related lymphopenia, allowing the depletion of lymphocytes to endure (16). T cell homeostatic factors can therefore contribute to the persistence of this phenomenon.

Although we first noted that hypoxia increased Gal-1 secretion, we also found that radiation exposure had the same effect in multiple cell lines, suggesting that Gal-1 secretion can be driven by different stressors (Supplementary Figure 6). Although upregulation of Gal-1 by radiation has been observed in cultured cell lines by others (17-20), we are the first to show that localized tumor radiation resulted in a measurable rise in plasma Gal-1 in vivo. Since we did not have plasma samples from NSCLC patients, we measured Gal-1 level in HNC patients, who generally have larger tumor volumes, hence potentially more detectable change of Gal-1 with radiation. In addition, we have previously shown that HNC produced Gal-1 that could be detected in the tumor stroma (21). Indeed, we detected a significant increase in plasma Gal-1 after radiation in these patients with a concomitant drop in T lymphocytes. Therefore, RT-induced secretion of Gal-1 can be detected in both mouse and human plasma.

Most notably, we found that Gal-1 drives RT-induced depletion of circulating T cells. Gal-1 is also produced by tumor-associated endothelial cells (19), however, our tumor model, which controls for host Gal-1 with Gal1−/− mice, suggests that tumor Gal-1 alone is responsible for the drop in circulating T cells following RT. Gal-1-mediated T cell suppression at the periphery has been shown in other contexts, including the maintenance of central T cell tolerance (22). Here, we found that tumor secreted Gal-1 also drives the depletion of peripheral T cells after RT.

In lung cancer, Gal-1 expression is associated with increased tumor size, nodal metastasis and decreased survival (23, 24). Gal-1 promotes distant metastasis and down regulation of Gal-1 substantially reduced the development of spontaneous lung metastasis, an effect exclusive to immune competent hosts (9). Additionally, Gal-1 positive lung metastases showed more CD3+ T cell apoptosis within the metastatic site (25). Although local field RT caused some shrinkage of the primary tumor, it did not affect the number of lung metastasis, which could be explained by RT-stimulation of Gal-1 secretion. Interestingly, TDG treatment alone in our model did not significantly affect lung metastasis, contradictory to Gal-1 genetic inhibition and is potentially due to the fact that TDG is a less efficient inhibitor of Gal-1 than shRNA and we used local rather than systemic TDG administration. When Ito and colleagues used intravenous administration of TDG in a breast cancer model, they showed that systemic TDG treatment reduced lung metastasis (25). Here, combined TDG and RT, however, significantly reduced the number of lung metastasis by 40%, indicating that combining a Gal-1 inhibitor and radiation can minimize both tumor growth and dissemination.

In this study, we provide evidence that tumors shed more Gal-1 into the blood after RT, causing greater systemic lymphopenia as a bystander phenomenon. Less circulating lymphocytes would result in fewer lymphocytes available to infiltrate the tumor, further suppressing the antitumor response, promoting more aggressive tumor growth and spread. This was supported by our observation that Gal-1 depletion alone increased intratumoral CD8+ T cells compared to scramble tumors (9, 26, 27) and that combined Gal-1 down regulation and radiation increased tumor CD8+ T cell infiltration even further.

A complex relationship exists between RT and the immune system. RT can enhance the antitumor immune response, acting indirectly on the tumor through the host immune system (28, 29). RT increases the peptide repertoire, enhancing cytokines and components of the antigen presentation pathway to promote recruitment and tumor lysis by CD8+ T cells (30-32). Despite its immune stimulating effects, RT does not result in protective immunity in the clinic since relapse occurs. Our observations support that Gal-1 works in opposition of these cytokines, to disrupt accumulation of functional intratumoral effector T cells locally and from the periphery through RT-related immunosuppression. Combined, these functions, and Gal-1 involvement in tumor immune surveillance, can explain for poor prognosis related to Gal-1-mediated systemic lymphopenia.

Our identification of Gal-1 as a modulator of radiation-related lymphopenia provides an exciting new path in cancer immunotherapy with Gal-1 as a target to combine with radiation treatment. It also provides a rapid biological read out in the clinic to track the success of anti-Gal-1 therapy. Future efforts devoted to improving radiotherapy require maximizing the anti-tumor immune response (33) and we are currently exploring Gal-1 immunomodulatory effects as they relate to immune checkpoint proteins and tumor immunity. Targeting the Gal-1/N-Glycan interaction has been shown to promote vascular normalization and T cell recruitment to the tumor (34). This may be one of the mechanisms by which Gal-1 modulate tumor aggressiveness. Our continued investigation focuses on the molecular pathways involved in Gal-1 modulation of the tumor microenvironment, including its effect on angiogenesis, to improve the anti-tumor immune response with RT. Gal-1 blockade is currently achieved with neutralizing antibodies as well as peptide and synthetic small module inhibitors (35-38). Altogether, our future work will focus on the best way to inhibit Gal-1 function in combination with radiotherapy in order to improve curability in NSCLC.

METHODS

Cell lines and generation of stable Gal-1 knockdown

Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1),was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA). LKR13 murine lung adenocarcinoma cell line derived from KrasLA1 mice (39), was a generous gift from Alejandro Sweet-Cordero. Cells were cultured in DMEM (LLC-1) or RPMI (LKR13) with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100U/ml), streptomycin (0.1mg/ml) and at 37°C and 5% CO2 in air. Cell lines were not independently validated in our laboratory. To generate stable Gal-1 knockdowns, LLC-1 and LKR13 cells were subject to lentivirus transduction with scrambled or Gal-1 pLKo.1 shRNAs, CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTC GCTCGAGCGAGG GCGACTTAACCTTAGG or CCGGCCTACACTTCAATCCTCGCTTCTCGAGAAGCGAGGATTGAAGTGTAG GTTTTT (Thermoscientific Open Biosystems) as previously described (9).

Western blotting

Lysates were probed with goat anti-Gal-1 primary (1:1000, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), secondary anti-goat-HRP (1:10000, Zymed, South San Francisco, CA), mouse anti-β-actin primary (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI), and anti-mouse-HRP secondary (1:10000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) antibodies. Secreted Gal-1 in serum-free media was collected from LLC-1 and LKR13 Scr and shGal-1 cells, concentrated (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) and volumes were normalized by cell number.

Mice and Tumor models

C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory and bred with Lgals1 null (Gal-1−/−) mice from the Consortium for Functional Glycomics (Scripps Research Institute) to generate WT littermates (13). Genotyping by PCR WT forward primer: GACCCCATCCCTACACCCCAG; Gal-1 null forward primer: CTATCAGGACATAGCGTTGG; and common antisense primer: AAACTTCAGCCGGGAGAAAGG (9). WT and Gal-1−/− mice (8-10 weeks old) received subcutaneous inoculation of LLC scramble or shGal-1 cells (2 x 105) on the flank. Once tumors reached approximately 150 mm3, mice were placed in lead shielding jigs and exposed tumors received 20 Gy irradiation using a 250k Vp orthovoltage therapeutic X-ray machine (Philips, Andover, MA). Tumors were caliper measured and volume was calculated as ((width)2 x length)/2.

Thiodigalactoside treatment

Thiodigalactoside (TDG) was injected intratumorally in mice (120mg/kg) one week before radiation and every 2-3 days thereafter.

Isolation of Splenocyte and whole blood T cells

Splenocytes were isolated from spleen of 8-10-week old C57BL/6 WT and Gal-1−/− mice. After filtration and red blood cell lysis (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), splenocytes underwent density centrifugation (Cedarlane, Ontario, Canada) and resuspension at 1-2X106 cells/ml in RPMI containing 5ug/ml conconavalin A (Sigma, St. Louis MO),55uM betamercaptoethanol (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and Dithiolthreitol (1.1mM). Peripheral blood from retro-orbital eye bleed was collected in EDTA tubes and RBCs were lysed (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI).

In vitro T cell apoptosis and TUNEL staining

Lymphocytes were plated at 1-2x106 cells/ml for 24 hours followed by treatment with rGal-1 (10ug/ml) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 24 to 48 hours. TUNEL-FITC staining was performed using the Apo-Direct Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Flow cytometry

Lymphocyte subsets were stained with Pacific Blue anti-mouse CD3e rat IgG (clone 500A2), PE anti-mouse CD4 rat IgG (clone RM4-5), and Alexa Fluor 647 anti-mouse CD8a rat IgG (clone 53-6.7), at 4°C for 45 minutes in staining buffer (BD Biosciences San Jose, CA). Cell acquisition was performed with FACSDiva software on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with Flowjo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR).

Immunohistochemistry

Lung metastasis was quantified by H&E staining (15). Two sections 100μm apart were used for metastasis quantification, with at least five mice per group. Fixed sections were stained with goat anti-CD31 (1:100, clone M-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) followed by secondary anti-goat detection by DAB (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) (9).

Immunofluorescence

Frozen tissue sections were incubated with CD4 and CD8 primary (1:100, BD Biosciences, San Jose CA) and Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rat secondary antibodies (1:200, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) (13). Slides were labeled with TUNEL-FITC (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) and mounted in DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Immunofluorescence images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning confocal microscope, using 40x/0.95 NA and 63x/1.4 NA Plan Apochromat objectives.

Galectin-1 ELISA

Whole blood from retro-orbital bleeds were collected in BD Microtainer tubes with EDTA and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Plasma was diluted and subject to mouse Galectin-1 ELISA per manufacturer instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Patient population

Early-stage NSCLC patients included in our analysis were diagnosed between 1999 and 2013 with inoperable disease, received only SABR (no chemotherapy) and had pre- and post-radiation lymphocyte values up to 38 months after treatment. Head and neck cancer patients in our study were diagnosed between 2007 and 2013 and received radiation with cetuximab or cisplatin. Because some patients had multiple post-radiation lymphocyte counts, we calculated the maximum lymphocyte change as difference between the pre-RT value and the lowest post-RT value.

Statistical analysis

Patient survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model with the maximum drop in absolute lymphocyte counts between before and after radiotherapy as the only predictor. Four quartiles of the maximum drop in absolute lymphocyte counts before and after radiotherapy were plotted for the indicated endpoints. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from treatment date to death. Distant progression-free survival (DPFS) was defined as time from treatment to documented first distant relapse or death, local progression-free survival (LPFS) as time from treatment to documented first local relapse or death, and regional progression-free survival (RPFS) as time from treatment to documented first regional nodal relapse or death. In all other cases, quantifications were subject to two-tailed, unpaired Student's t test to analyze statistical differences between groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SE. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Declaration of ethical approval for experiments

Patient data collection was approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol 13535). Written informed consent was received from participants prior to inclusion in our study. Animals were housed in pathogen-free conditions and all procedures were conducted in accordance to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Stanford University (APLAC protocol 15106).

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE.

Our identification of Gal-1 as a modulator of radiation-related systemic lymphopenia provides an exciting new path in cancer therapy with Gal-1 as a target to combine with radiation treatment. Radiation-related lymphopenia is frequently observed with fractionated external beam radiotherapy and is associated with reduced survival. In particular, patients receiving radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) did significantly worse than their matched counterparts if they exhibited lymphopenia. Targeting the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, currently elusive, could improve curability. This is the first study to not only show that radiation enhances Gal-1 secretion in NSCLC, but also that a tumor secreted factor can significantly influence the level of circulating T lymphocyte after tumor irradiation while augmenting tumor growth and metastasis. Our results suggest that combining Gal-1 blockade with radiotherapy can enhance radiation effectiveness in NSCLC through the prevention of radiation-related lymphopenia and immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01CA161585, 5P01 CA067166-15). The authors thank Alejandro Sweet-Cordero for providing us LKR13 cells and mice.

Footnotes

The authors have no competing financial interests to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Balmanoukian A, Ye X, Herman J, Laheru D, Grossman SA. The association between treatment-related lymphopenia and survival in newly diagnosed patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer investigation. 2012;30:571–6. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2012.700987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grossman SA, Ye X, Lesser G, Sloan A, Carraway H, Desideri S, et al. Immunosuppression in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with radiation and temozolomide. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17:5473–80. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campian JL, Ye X, Brock M, Grossman SA. Treatment-related lymphopenia in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer investigation. 2013;31:183–8. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2013.767342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campian J, Sarai G, Ye X, Marur S, Grossman SA. The association between severe treatment-related lymphopenia and progression free survival in patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell head and neck cancer. Head & neck. 2013 doi: 10.1002/hed.23535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Standish LJ, Torkelson C, Hamill FA, Yim D, Hill-Force A, Fitzpatrick A, et al. Immune defects in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy. Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology. 2008;6:110–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rabinovich GA, Ramhorst RE, Rubinstein N, Corigliano A, Daroqui MC, Kier-Joffe EB, et al. Induction of allogenic T-cell hyporesponsiveness by galectin-1-mediated apoptotic and non-apoptotic mechanisms. Cell death and differentiation. 2002;9:661–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rubinstein N, Alvarez M, Zwirner NW, Toscano MA, Ilarregui JM, Bravo A, et al. Targeted inhibition of galectin-1 gene expression in tumor cells results in heightened T cell-mediated rejection; A potential mechanism of tumor-immune privilege. Cancer cell. 2004;5:241–51. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van der Leij J, van den Berg A, Harms G, Eschbach H, Vos H, Zwiers P, et al. Strongly enhanced IL-10 production using stable galectin-1 homodimers. Molecular immunology. 2007;44:506–13. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banh A, Zhang J, Cao H, Bouley DM, Kwok S, Kong C, et al. Tumor galectin-1 mediates tumor growth and metastasis through regulation of T-cell apoptosis. Cancer research. 2011;71:4423–31. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalotto-Moreno T, Croci DO, Cerliani JP, Martinez-Allo VC, Dergan-Dylon S, Mendez-Huergo SP, et al. Targeting galectin-1 overcomes breast cancer-associated immunosuppression and prevents metastatic disease. Cancer research. 2013;73:1107–17. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tabrizi SJ, Niiro H, Masui M, Yoshimoto G, Iino T, Kikushige Y, et al. T cell leukemia/lymphoma 1 and galectin-1 regulate survival/cell death pathways in human naive and IgM+ memory B cells through altering balances in Bcl-2 family proteins. J Immunol. 2009;182:1490–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sorger D, Patt M, Kumar P, Wiebe LI, Barthel H, Seese A, et al. [18F]Fluoroazomycinarabinofuranoside (18FAZA) and [18F]Fluoromisonidazole (18FMISO): a comparative study of their selective uptake in hypoxic cells and PET imaging in experimental rat tumors. Nuclear medicine and biology. 2003;30:317–26. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(02)00442-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wild AT, Hiniker SM, Chang DT, Tran PT, Khashab MA, Limaye MR, et al. Re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a novel treatment option for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after multimodality therapy: experience from two institutions. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2013;4:343–51. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hellerstein M, Hanley MB, Cesar D, Siler S, Papageorgopoulos C, Wieder E, et al. Directly measured kinetics of circulating T lymphocytes in normal and HIV-1-infected humans. Nature medicine. 1999;5:83–9. doi: 10.1038/4772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cho M, Cummings RD. Galectin-1, a beta-galactoside-binding lectin in Chinese hamster ovary cells. II. Localization and biosynthesis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995;270:5207–12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ellsworth S, Balmanoukian A, Kos F, Nirschl CJ, Nirschl TR, Grossman SA, et al. Sustained CD4 T cell-driven lymphopenia without a compensatory IL-7/IL-15 response among high-grade glioma patients treated with radiation and temozolomide. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e27357. doi: 10.4161/onci.27357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Strik HM, Schmidt K, Lingor P, Tonges L, Kugler W, Nitsche M, et al. Galectin-1 expression in human glioma cells: modulation by ionizing radiation and effects on tumor cell proliferation and migration. Oncology reports. 2007;18:483–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang EY, Chen YF, Chen YM, Lin IH, Wang CC, Su WH, et al. A novel radioresistant mechanism of galectin-1 mediated by H-Ras-dependent pathways in cervical cancer cells. Cell death & disease. 2012;3:e251. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Upreti M, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Apana S, Berridge M, Fologea DA, Koonce NA, et al. Radiation-induced galectin-1 by endothelial cells: a promising molecular target for preferential drug delivery to the tumor vasculature. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013;91:497–506. doi: 10.1007/s00109-012-0965-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Griffin RJ, Koonce NA, Dings RP, Siegel E, Moros EG, Brauer-Krisch E, et al. Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide. Radiation research. 2012;177:804–12. doi: 10.1667/rr2784.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Le QT, Kong C, Lavori PW, O'Byrne K, Erler JT, Huang X, et al. Expression and Prognostic Significance of a Panel of Tissue Hypoxia Markers in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2007;69:167–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sotomayor CE, Rabinovich GA. “Galectin-1 induces central and peripheral cell death: implications in T-cell physiopathology”. Developmental immunology. 2000;7:117–29. doi: 10.1155/2000/36321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Szoke T, Kayser K, Baumhakel JD, Trojan I, Furak J, Tiszlavicz L, et al. Prognostic significance of endogenous adhesion/growth-regulatory lectins in lung cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:167–74. doi: 10.1159/000087841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Szoke T, Kayser K, Trojan I, Kayser G, Furak J, Tiszlavicz L, et al. The role of microvascularization and growth/adhesion-regulatory lectins in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer in stage II. European journal of cardio thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2007;31:783–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ito K, Ralph SJ. Inhibiting galectin-1 reduces murine lung metastasis with increased CD4(+) and CD8 (+) T cells and reduced cancer cell adherence. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2012;29:561–72. doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9471-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ito K, Scott SA, Cutler S, Dong LF, Neuzil J, Blanchard H, et al. Thiodigalactoside inhibits murine cancers by concurrently blocking effects of galectin-1 on immune dysregulation, angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress. Angiogenesis. 2011;14:293–307. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9213-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Soldati R, Berger E, Zenclussen AC, Jorch G, Lode HN, Salatino M, et al. Neuroblastoma triggers an immunoevasive program involving galectin-1-dependent modulation of T cell and dendritic cell compartments. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2012;131:1131–41. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park B, Yee C, Lee KM. The effect of radiation on the immune response to cancers. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15:927–43. doi: 10.3390/ijms15010927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gameiro SR, Jammeh ML, Wattenberg MM, Tsang KY, Ferrone S, Hodge JW. Radiation-induced immunogenic modulation of tumor enhances antigen processing and calreticulin exposure, resulting in enhanced T-cell killing. Oncotarget. 2014;5:403–16. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lugade AA, Moran JP, Gerber SA, Rose RC, Frelinger JG, Lord EM. Local radiation therapy of B16 melanoma tumors increases the generation of tumor antigen-specific effector cells that traffic to the tumor. J Immunol. 2005;174:7516–23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lugade AA, Sorensen EW, Gerber SA, Moran JP, Frelinger JG, Lord EM. Radiation-induced IFN-gamma production within the tumor microenvironment influences antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 2008;180:3132–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liang H, Deng L, Burnette B, Weichselbaum RR, Fu YX. Radiation-induced tumor dormancy reflects an equilibrium between the proliferation and T lymphocyte-mediated death of malignant cells. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e25668. doi: 10.4161/onci.25668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lawrence YR, Dicker AP. Radiation therapy and the immune system: learning to live together. Future Oncol. 2014;10:777–80. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Croci DO, Cerliani JP, Dalotto-Moreno T, Mendez-Huergo SP, Mascanfroni ID, Dergan-Dylon S, et al. Glycosylation-dependent lectin-receptor interactions preserve angiogenesis in anti-VEGF refractory tumors. Cell. 2014;156:744–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dings RP, van der Schaft DW, Hargittai B, Haseman J, Griffioen AW, Mayo KH. Anti-tumor activity of the novel angiogenesis inhibitor anginex. Cancer letters. 2003;194:55–66. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(03)00015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thijssen VL, Postel R, Brandwijk RJ, Dings RP, Nesmelova I, Satijn S, et al. Galectin-1 is essential in tumor angiogenesis and is a target for antiangiogenesis therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:15975–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603883103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dings RP, Miller MC, Nesmelova I, Astorgues-Xerri L, Kumar N, Serova M, et al. Antitumor agent calixarene 0118 targets human galectin-1 as an allosteric inhibitor of carbohydrate binding. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2012;55:5121–9. doi: 10.1021/jm300014q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zucchetti M, Bonezzi K, Frapolli R, Sala F, Borsotti P, Zangarini M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and antineoplastic activity of galectin-1-targeting OTX008 in combination with sunitinib. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2013;72:879–87. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wislez M, Spencer ML, Izzo JG, Juroske DM, Balhara K, Cody DD, et al. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin reverses alveolar epithelial neoplasia induced by oncogenic K-ras. Cancer research. 2005;65:3226–35. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

RESOURCES