Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Mar 23;509(7498):115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature13083

Extended Data Table 2.

Binding affinities for different P2Y12R constructs

Inhibition of binding Ki (nM), WT Ki (nM), WT+BRIL Ki (nM), WT+D294N mutation Ki (nM), WT+BRIL +D294N mutation
ADP 332±35 405±122 169±81 280±85
2MeSADP 120±7.3 91.3±30.7 80.8±16.8 128±48
2MeSATP 119±19.8 68.0±20.8 82.4±28.5 93.2±19.9
AZD1283 31.5±11.9 39.3±9.9 42.2±27.7 43.9±10.0
PSB-0739 275±58 155±73 72.8±16.7 † 157±58
Ticagrelor 454±110 299±138 424±193 182±70
Saturation binding WT WT+BRIL WT+D294N mutation WT+BRIL+D294N mutation
Kd (nM) 35.9±6.3 36.7±3.6 33.6±10.2 51.5±12.0
Bmax (pmol/mg protein) 6.34±0.27 6.87±0.78 11.4+1.1 11.9±0.63

Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) from 3–8 separate experiments performed in duplicate.

†

One-way analysis of variance with post-hoc test yielded significant difference (P<0.05) compared with wild type (WT) but not with WT+BRIL and WT+BRIL+D294N groups (P>0.05). The affinities of other ligands at wild type are not significantly different from their affinities at mutants (P > 0.05).