Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 9;15(4):504–518. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt002

Table 2:

False-positive rates for the self-contained hypothesis for varying level of correlation in the gene set observed for different methods of gene set analysis

Method Correlation r of genes in G
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Q1 0.05 0.096 0.178 0.22 0.282
GSEA 0.034 0.07 0.066 0.062 0.06
GSA 0.056 0.072 0.07 0.086 0.096
GSA2 0.05 0.057 0.047 0.06 0.05
SAFE 0.053 0.043 0.06 0.04 0.057
Globaltest 0.05 0.036 0.038 0.062 0.066
Q2 0.054 0.034 0.046 0.044 0.05
ES.SC 0.048 0.052 0.054 0.052 0.054
ES.SC Analytic 0.044 0.13 0.318 0.556 0.822
PAGE 0.03 0.148 0.32 0.606 0.702
CATEGORY 0.066 0.482 0.632 0.682 0.772
PAR Wilcoxon 0.056 0.516 0.644 0.716 0.802

Methods are denoted as in Table 1. The following specific settings of the methods were used: SAFE uses the Wilcoxon statistic; Globaltest uses the asymptotic null distribution; ES.SC uses null distribution based on permutation of samples; ES.SC Analytic uses the Kolmogorov–Smirnov null distribution; GSA uses all genes in the data set for re-standardization; GSA2 is the modified version of GSA with the P-value based on Equation (6). PAR Wilcoxon is the parametric method suggested by Irizarry et al. [16], see last row in Table 1.