Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;62(Pt 12):2946–2954. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.039248-0

Table 1. Genetic analysis of strain H63T compared with its nearest neighbours based on 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Strain Source Reference 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (%) to strain H63T DNA–DNA hybridization (%)* with H63T DNA as: DNA G+C content (mol%)
Probe Covalent DNA
L. cardiaca sp. nov. H63T Clinical Pearce et al. (2011) (100) (100) (100) 41.8
L. brunensis ATCC 43878T Environmental Wilkinson et al. (1988) 98.8 17.3±5.8 20.3±7.2 40.5
L. londiniensis ATCC 49505T Environmental Dennis et al. (1993) 97.0 5.7±2.4 2.4±1.1 43.0
L. jordanis ATCC 33623T Environmental Cherry et al. (1982) 96.8 15.7±1.8 4.5±3.0 45.0
L. erythra ATCC 35303T Environmental Brenner et al. (1985) 96.2 4.3±0.6 7.5±6.6 51.0
L. dresdenensis NCTC 13409T Environmental Lück et al. (2010) 96.0 5.0±0.4 8.7±2.6 42.5
L. rubrilucens ATCC 35304T Environmental Brenner et al. (1985) 95.7 6.2±2.6 9.3±4.7 52.0
L. feeleii ATCC 35072T Environmental Herwaldt et al. (1984) 95.7 3.7±2.2 6.4±2.8 46.0
L. pneumophila ATCC 33152T Clinical Brenner et al. (1979) 95.7 5.3±2.3 15.1±5.7 39.0
L. birminghamensis ATCC 43702T Clinical Wilkinson et al. (1987) 95.7 6.3±2.0 4.5±2.6 42.9
*

Means±sd of at least triplicate hybridization experiments are shown.