TABLE 2.
Performance results of participants included in the fMRI analyses
| Baseline | Post-test | Change (post-test - baseline) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task | Variable | Exercise | Control | Exercise | Control | Exercise | Control |
| Antisaccade | n | 22 | 17 | 23 | 17 | 21 | 16 |
| Percent correct | 56 (26) | 53 (20) | 67 (21) | 63 (24) | 10 (24)b | 10 (13)b | |
| Correct latency (ms) | 461 (80) | 425 (110) | 480 (91) | 438 (92) | 11 (90) | 11 (159) | |
| Error latency (ms) | 398 (87)a | 326 (73)a | 370 (106) | 359 (83) | –9(111) | 22 (80) | |
| Percent of errors corrected | 76 (20) | 65 (27) | 69 (33) | 69 (29) | –11 (38) | 5 (37) | |
| Error correction latency (ms) | 332 (88) | 292 (66) | 315 (100) | 345 (113) | –12 (114) | 43 (102) | |
| Flanker | n | 22 | 17 | 22 | 17 | 21 | 17 |
| Congruent percent correct | 86 (26) | 92 (23) | 97 (4) | 98 (2) | 10 (24)b | 6 (22)b | |
| Congruent correct latency (ms) | 1122 (224)a | 998 (106)a | 1024 (158) | 1010 (172) | –71 (171) | 12 (166) | |
| Incongruent percent correct | 73 (35) | 88 (21) | 85 (26) | 89 (25) | 9 (33) | 0 (35) | |
| Incongruent correct latency (ms) | 1,278 (292) | 1,191 (175) | 1,171 (220) | 1,143 (194) | –52 (223) | –48 (197) | |
| Interference effect | 14 (18) | 20 (15) | 14 (13) | 14(11) | 1 (17) | –6 (14) | |
Mean and SD. Change scores for variables of interest were calculated by subtracting each individual's baseline value from their post-test value.
a
Significant baseline difference between groups, P < 0.05.
b
Significant change over time, P< 0.05.