Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2014 May;88(9):4962–4975. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00063-14

Epstein-Barr Virus BALF3 Has Nuclease Activity and Mediates Mature Virion Production during the Lytic Cycle

Shih-Hsin Chiu a,b, Meng-Chuan Wu a,*, Chung-Chun Wu b, Yu-Ching Chen c, Su-Fang Lin b, John T-A Hsu d, Chung-Shi Yang c, Ching-Hwa Tsai a, Kenzo Takada e, Mei-Ru Chen a, Jen-Yang Chen a,b,✉
Editor: R M Longnecker
PMCID: PMC3993834  PMID: 24554665

ABSTRACT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic replication involves complex processes, including DNA synthesis, DNA cleavage and packaging, and virion egress. These processes require many different lytic gene products, but the mechanisms of their actions remain unclear, especially for DNA cleavage and packaging. According to sequence homology analysis, EBV BALF3, encoded by the third leftward open reading frame of the BamHI-A fragment in the viral genome, is a homologue of herpes simplex virus type 1 UL28. This gene product is believed to possess the properties of a terminase, such as nucleolytic activity on newly synthesized viral DNA and translocation of unit length viral genomes into procapsids. In order to characterize EBV BALF3, the protein was produced by and purified from recombinant baculoviruses and examined in an enzymatic reaction in vitro, which determined that EBV BALF3 acts as an endonuclease and its activity is modulated by Mg2+, Mn2+, and ATP. Moreover, in EBV-positive epithelial cells, BALF3 was expressed and transported from the cytoplasm into the nucleus following induction of the lytic cycle, and gene silencing of BALF3 caused a reduction of DNA packaging and virion release. Interestingly, suppression of BALF3 expression also decreased the efficiency of DNA synthesis. On the basis of these results, we suggest that EBV BALF3 is involved simultaneously in DNA synthesis and packaging and is required for the production of mature virions.

IMPORTANCE Virus lytic replication is essential to produce infectious virions, which is responsible for virus survival and spread. This work shows that an uncharacterized gene product of the human herpesvirus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), BALF3, is expressed during the lytic cycle. In addition, BALF3 mediates an endonucleolytic reaction and is involved in viral DNA synthesis and packaging, leading to influence on the production of mature virions. According to sequence homology and physical properties, the lytic gene product BALF3 is considered a terminase in EBV. These findings identify a novel viral gene with an important role in contributing to a better understanding of the EBV life cycle.

INTRODUCTION

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a human gammaherpesvirus, is a double-stranded DNA virus whose replication in the host cell involves two stages, latency and the lytic cycle. During latency, no EBV particles are produced and the viral DNA exists as a circular plasmid, the episome, in the nuclei of host cells (1–3). For the maintenance of a constant viral episome copy number, the EBV genomic DNA replicating once per S phase is dependent on a latent protein Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1). In addition, EBNA1 recognizes the origin of latent replication, oriP, in the episome and recruits cellular replication factors, including the origin recognition complex, the minichromosome maintenance factor, cdc6, and cdt1, to carry out the synthesis of viral DNA (4–10). The duplicated viral DNA is evenly distributed into the daughter cells during mitosis. As the stage switches from latency to the lytic cycle, spontaneously or induced by exogenous agents, EBV lytic DNA replication is initiated by viral replication proteins binding to the origin of lytic replication, oriLyt, resulting in a head-to-tail DNA molecule, the concatemer, that is synthesized via rolling-circle replication (11). This concatemer is cleaved to generate unit length genomes that are translocated into procapsids (12). Among the processes of lytic replication, DNA cleavage and packaging are performed by a lytic protein, the terminase, with activity equivalent to that seen in double-stranded DNA bacteriophages, as well as in herpesviruses.

The terminase has been described as a hetero-oligomer and is composed of two subunits, i.e., UL28 and UL15, encoded by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) (13, 14); in addition, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL56 and UL89 and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) open reading frame 30 (ORF30) and ORF45/42 have been identified as the homologous counterparts of HSV-1 UL28 and UL15 (15–17). Host cells infected with temperature-sensitive UL28 mutant HSV-1 accumulate a large number of capsids in the nucleus at the nonpermissive temperature, and the capsids not only lack viral DNA but have compact inner structures; furthermore, UL28 deletion mutants of HSV-1 are unable to cleave the concatemeric viral DNA (13, 18). The homologue of HSV-1 UL28, HCMV UL56, has the capacity to cleave the supercoiled form of plasmid DNA and is able to hydrolyze ATP to ADP and Pi (19, 20). On the other hand, a temperature-sensitive mutation in the partner of HSV-1 UL28, UL15, causes the endless form of viral DNA and inner shell-containing capsids to accumulate in abundance in the nuclei of infected cells (14, 21). Knockdown of HCMV UL89, the HSV-1 UL15 homologue, suppresses the formation of mature virions; moreover, UL89 exhibits nuclease activity and the nucleolytic reaction is enhanced in the presence of HCMV UL56 (22, 23). Therefore, these observations have suggested that the human herpesvirus (HHV) terminase is responsible for DNA cleavage and packaging and has the endonuclease and ATPase activities to mediate the initiation of these processes. Recently, HSV-1 UL33 has been reported to interact directly with HSV-1 UL28 and is believed to optimize the stability of the terminase complex and now is considered a third terminase subunit of HSV-1. This activity is conserved in other HHVs, HCMV UL51 and VZV ORF25 (24–28).

During progeny virion assembly, terminase-dependent DNA cleavage and packaging occur at specific sites in the concatemer. In HSV-1, the genome is composed of a unique long (L) sequence and a unique short (S) sequence and contains tandem repeated regions, the a sequences or terminal repeats, at each end. The a sequence exists as one or more copies at the L terminus, a single copy at the S terminus, and one or more inverted copies at the L-S junction (29–33), and it consists of two unique sequences, termed Ub and Uc, containing the signals for DNA cleavage and packaging (34–36). The signals within the Ub and Uc regions are pac1 and pac2 motifs, respectively, acting as cis-acting elements, and these motifs are highly conserved in the termini of other herpesvirus genomes, including HSV-2, VZV, HCMV, and animal herpesviruses (37–46). HSV-1 UL28 has been shown to interact with a DNA fragment containing a pac1 motif, and the single-stranded DNA structure induced by heat treatment increases the affinity of UL28 binding to the signal (47). Similarly, the a sequence of the HCMV genome is required for DNA cleavage and packaging (39), and HCMV UL56 appears to bind to pac1 and pac2 motifs and cleave DNA bearing these signals (20). In the EBV genome, the terminus comprises variable numbers of copies of the 538-bp terminal repeat in a direct orientation. Sequence alignment of the genomic termini of EBV and other HHVs reveals that the conserved cleavage/packaging signals, pac1 and pac2, also are present in the terminal repeat region of the EBV genome. A deficiency of the terminal repeat affects EBV DNA packaging efficiency, resulting in the production of abundant empty capsids; furthermore, a single copy of the terminal repeat containing the signals is sufficient for packaging of viral DNA (12, 48, 49).

The terminase subunits of EBV have been identified as BALF3, BGRF1/BDRF1, and BFRF1A by analysis of sequence homologies (50); however, the contribution of these proteins to EBV replication remains unclear. In this study, we focused on characterizing BALF3, a homologue of HSV-1 UL28, because this may play a major role in the recognition of the cleavage/packaging signals to initiate DNA cleavage and packaging and affect the production of infectious virions. The EBV BALF3 protein was produced using a baculovirus expression system, and its biochemical properties were determined. In addition, we explored the biological function of EBV BALF3 during the lytic cycle in EBV-positive epithelial cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines and induction of the viral lytic cycle.

Sf9 cells, derived from the ovary of Spodoptera frugiperda, were used to propagate recombinant baculoviruses to produce the protein of interest. Sf9 cells were maintained in Sf-900 II SFM (Invitrogen) at 28°C. NPC-TW01 (TW01) is a human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line, derived from the tumor of a Taiwanese patient, that has lost the EBV genome (51). NA cells were established from TW01 cells infected with recombinant Akata EBV (52). TW01 and NA cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. In addition, the culture medium of NA cells was supplemented with the antibiotic G418 (Ameresco) at 400 μg/ml to maintain the EBV genome. For induction of the EBV lytic cycle, NA cells were treated with 40 ng/ml 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and 3 mM sodium butyrate (SB) (Sigma-Aldrich) (52).

Transfection.

Cells were transfected with plasmids or small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) by using transfection agents according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Briefly, for expression of the EBV BALF3 protein in a baculovirus expression system, Sf9 cells were cotransfected with 1 μg pBacPAK8-MTGFP-His-BALF3, a recombinant transfer vector, and 0.1 μg BD BaculoGold Linearized Baculovirus DNA (BD Biosciences) by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) at 28°C for 4 h, the culture medium was refreshed, and the cells were incubated at 28°C for 5 days to produce virions. To determine the subcellular localization of EBV BALF3, TW01 and NA cells were transfected with 0.8 μg pEGFP-C1 (Clontech Laboratories) or pEGFP-C1-BALF3 by using Lipofectamine 2000 at 37°C for 4 h, and the culture medium was refreshed prior to the addition of TPA and SB for 36 h of incubation. For the knockdown of EBV BALF3, NA cells were transfected with the indicated concentration of Stealth RNA interference siRNA specific to BALF3 or Negative Control Duplexes (Invitrogen) by siPORT NeoFX (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 24 h and then treated with TPA and SB for the indicated time after replacement of the culture medium.

Western blotting.

Cell extracts were harvested by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS [sodium dodecyl sulfate], 10 mM EDTA, 1% Igepal CA-630, protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Applied Science]) for 20 min on ice and then centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to collect the supernatants. The lysates were mixed with bromophenol blue buffer and then heated at 95°C for 5 min. The samples were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) at 100 V and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) at 300 mA for 90 min in a cold room. The membrane was soaked in 5% skim milk at room temperature for 1 h. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies specific to His (GE Healthcare), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Biodesign), green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Clontech Laboratories), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), α-tubulin (Millipore), EBV BMRF1 (88), or EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) gp125 (GeneTex) at 4°C overnight prior to horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory) at room temperature for 1 h. The signal was detected by development with an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (PerkinElmer) and exposure to X-ray film (Fujifilm).

Expression and purification of the EBV BALF3 protein.

pBacPAK8-MTGFP-His-BALF3 was generated by cloning the nucleotide sequence of His-BALF3 into pBacPAK8-MTGFP (53), a transfer vector, at the BglII cloning site. For the expression of the recombinant protein, the procedure was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Clontech Laboratories). Briefly, after cotransfection, the cell culture supernatant was collected and subjected to 10-fold serial dilution to select virus clones. For the examination of protein levels, the cells were infected with the selected clones and incubated at 28°C for 2 days, and then the cell extracts were harvested and subjected to Western blotting. Furthermore, the virus stock was amplified at 28°C for 5 days and the titer was calculated as the 50% tissue culture infective dose to determine the multiplicity of infection.

For purification of the recombinant protein, the procedure was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). Briefly, cells infected with the recombinant viruses were extracted with lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 1% Igepal CA-630, protease inhibitor cocktail, pH 8.0) for 30 min on ice; centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to collect the cell culture supernatants; and then mixed gently with Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) resin on a rotary shaker at 4°C for 2 h. After incubation, the lysate-resin mixture was washed with wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and then the fractions containing the recombinant protein were harvested with elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0).

In vitro nuclease activity assay.

The in vitro nuclease activity assay was carried out as described previously (20), with some modifications. pBS-TR, as a nuclease substrate, is a recombinant plasmid containing a 538-bp terminal repeat fragment of B95-8 EBV DNA (54, 55), generated by insertion at the EagI cloning site of pBlueScript (Stratagene). The protein of interest (2 μg/ml) was incubated with 0.5 μg plasmids in 10 μl of reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5] and the indicated concentration of MgCl2, MnCl2, or ATP) at 37°C for 1 h. After incubation, the samples were mixed with bromophenol blue/xylene cyanol FF buffer and then loaded into a 1% agarose gel for electrophoresis at 100 V. The signal was imaged and photographed by AlphaImage (Alpha Innotech) with ethidium bromide (EtBr) staining.

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

RNA extracts were incubated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C for 30 min, and the nucleolytic reaction was stopped by incubation with 2.5 mM EDTA at 65°C for 10 min. The samples were mixed with 0.5 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 2.5 μM oligo(dT) primer, and 2 U RNaseOUT RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen) and incubated at 42°C for 2 min prior to RT with 10 U SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42°C for 50 min and then at 70°C for 15 min. After RT, the cDNA samples were used for PCR or quantitative PCR (qPCR). In PCR, the cDNA samples were mixed with 0.5 μM primers, 0.25 mM dNTP, and 0.125 U Taq DNA polymerase (Geneaid). PCR was performed on DNA Engine Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with the following cycling program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; 22 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 57°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were mixed with xylene cyanol FF buffer and loaded into a 2% agarose gel for electrophoresis at 100 V, and then the signal was imaged and photographed by AlphaImage with EtBr staining. In qPCR, the cDNA samples were mixed with 1 μM primers and qPCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems). qPCR was performed using LightCycler (Roche Applied Science) with the following cycling program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min and 50 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 50°C for 5 s, and extension at 72°C for 10 s. The primers used in this study were BZLF1-forward (5′-GAGTCAACATCCAGGCTTGG-3′) and BZLF1-reverse (5′-GCAGCACTACCGTGAGGTG-3′), BRLF1-forward (5′-CGGGAGACTTTCGAGTTCAT-3′) and BRLF1-reverse (5′-AAACTCCTATCCTCGTGTCC-3′), BALF5-forward (5′-CGGAGTTGTTATCAAAGAGGC-3′) and BALF5-reverse (5′-CGAGAAAGACGGAGATGGC-3′) (56), BMRF1-forward (5′-AGAGACACCCTCGCCTGC-3′) and BMRF1-reverse (5′-GCTTCTGCTTCTGCCTGG-3′), BALF3-forward (5′-CGTGAGGTAAAGCCCATCC-3′) and BALF3-reverse (5′-GCCGTCCTAACCGTGTCC-3′), and GAPDH-forward (5′-CCTGCCAAATATGATGACATCAAG-3′) and GAPDH-reverse (5′-ACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′).

Indirect immunofluorescence staining.

Slide-cultured cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min and then permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 5 min. For immunostaining, the samples were blocked in 4% fetal bovine serum at room temperature for 30 min and conducted with the anti-BMRF1 antibody at room temperature for 1 h prior to the incubation of Rhodamine Red-X-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory) at room temperature for another 1 h. DNA was stained with Hoechst 33258 at room temperature for 30 s. The slides were covered with mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and photographed with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus) and a confocal microscope (Leica).

Subcellular fractionation.

The subcellular fractionation assay was carried out as described previously (57), with some modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested and resuspended in cytoplasmic extract buffer (10 mM HEPES, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.075% Igepal CA-630, protease inhibitor cocktail) for 5 min on ice and then centrifuged at 180 × g for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatants and pellets were collected and identified as the cytosolic and nuclear fractions, respectively. The nuclear fraction was washed twice with cytoplasmic extract buffer in the absence of the detergent prior to lysis by RIPA buffer. The extracts were subjected to Western blotting, and antibodies specific to α-tubulin and PARP1 are used as cytoplasmic and nuclear markers, respectively.

Detection and quantification of viral DNA.

Assays for the detection and quantification of viral DNA were carried out as described previously (56, 58), with some modifications. For the detection of released virions, cell culture supernatants were collected and treated with DNase I at 37°C for 1 h and the nucleolytic reaction was stopped by heating at 70°C for 10 min. The samples were digested with 1 mg/ml proteinase K (Invitrogen) at 50°C for 2 h and then inactivated at 70°C for 15 min. For the detection of intracellular viral genomic DNA, cell extracts were harvested in lysis buffer (10 mM Tri-HCl [pH 7.5], 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1% Tween 20, 1% Igepal CA-630, 1 mg/ml proteinase K) at 50°C for 4 h and then inactivated at 70°C for 15 min. After proteolytic digestion, both samples were subjected to qPCR with primers corresponding to EBV BALF5. In this assay, Raji cells, an EBV-positive, nonproducing Burkitt's lymphoma cell line (59), were used as the standard for the amount of viral genomes (50 genome copies/cell).

Ultrathin sectioning and transmission electron microscopy.

Cells were prefixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 h and then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0) prior to fixation in 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. After fixation, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol starting with a series of increasing concentrations: 50, 70, 80, and 95% for 10 min each, followed by 100% ethanol for 10 min three times. The dehydrated samples were embedded in Spurr's resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and placed at 68°C for 15 h for polymerization. Ultrathin sections were prepared with an ultramicrotome (Leica). The signal of the samples was imaged and photographed with a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi).

Purification of viral capsids.

The assay was carried out as described previously (89, 90) with some modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested by scraping, pelleted, and resuspended in a lysis buffer (0.01 M Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.5], 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor cocktail). The cells were then frozen, thawed, and centrifuged at 180 × g for 5 min to collect the nuclei. The pellets were resuspended in TNE buffer (0.01 M Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.5]) and sonicated. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and then the viruses were pelleted from the supernatants into a 5-ml 35% sucrose cushion prepared in TNE buffer by ultracentrifugation at 25,000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C using an SW41Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). The pellets were resuspended in TNE buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and A-, B-, and C-type capsids were separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation on a 5-ml 20% to 50% sucrose gradient prepared in TNE buffer at 25,000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C using an SW41Ti rotor. After ultracentrifugation, the gradients were fractionated and subjected to Western blotting analysis.

Gardella gel analysis.

Gardella gel analysis was carried out as described previously (58, 60), with some modifications. Briefly, 2 × 106 cells were suspended in 50 μl sample buffer (15% Ficoll, 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA, 0.003% bromophenol blue, 400 μg/ml RNase A), and the cells were lysed by being loaded into the wells of a 0.8% agarose gel containing 2% SDS and 1 mg/ml proteinase K and run at 0.8 V/cm at 4°C for 3 h. The extracts were separated by being run in a 0.8% agarose gel at 4.5 V/cm at 4°C for an additional 40 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was used for Southern blotting with probe hybridization. In this study, a 32P-radiolabeled random-primed probe corresponding to the EBV BamHI-W fragment was used for hybridization; in addition, chemically induced B95-8 cells, an EBV-producing marmoset B cell line treated with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB (61), and Raji cells were used as the positive controls for linear and episomal EBV DNA, respectively.

Southern blotting and hybridization.

DNA samples in the agarose gel were depurinated in 0.25 N HCl for 30 min and then denatured by replacement with an alkaline solution (1.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M NaOH) for 20 min twice. After denaturation, the gel was soaked in transfer buffer (1.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M NaOH) for 15 min prior to transfer onto a nylon membrane (PerkinElmer) at room temperature overnight. The membrane was washed with 2× SSC buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), followed by UV exposure for cross-linking of the transferred DNA. Hybridization was performed by incubating the membrane with the 32P-radiolabeled random-primed probe in Church buffer (0.5 M NaH2PO4 [pH 7.2], 7% SDS, 1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) at 65°C overnight, and then the membrane was washed with Church washing buffer (0.5 M NaH2PO4 [pH 7.2], 5% SDS, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0)] at 70°C. After hybridization, the signal was detected by exposure to X-ray film.

RESULTS

Expression and purification of EBV BALF3.

According to the recently updated amino acid sequence of EBV BALF3 available in NCBI GenBank (accession no. AFY97901) (62), the coding region of the BALF3 gene product contains 685 amino acids encoded by 2,058 nucleotides. Alignment of the sequences of BALF3 and its homologues from other HHVs, such as HSV-1 UL28 (GenBank accession no. AFP86392), HSV-2 UL28 (GenBank accession no. NP_044498), VZV ORF30 (GenBank accession no. AFO85607), HCMV UL56 (GenBank accession no. ABB71174), HHV-6 U40 (GenBank accession no. CAA58374), HHV-7 U40 (GenBank accession no. YP_073780), and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) ORF7 (GenBank accession no. ACY00398), revealed that several regions were highly conserved, and these conserved regions have been described as putative functional domains for enzymatic activities (Fig. 1A). In the N-terminal half, BALF3 had the C173-X2-C176-X22-C199-H201 region, which is similar to the hypothetical zinc finger motif of HCMV UL56, which is considered to be involved in DNA binding (63). Otherwise, the ATP-binding motif of HCMV UL56 was likely to be in the region of amino acids 619 to 626, YNKTWGRS, in the C-terminal half of BALF3 (64). Supported by previous studies of bacteriophages, as well as herpesviruses, the terminase is believed to possess nuclease activity. In order to confirm this enzymatic property, the coding region of the EBV gene for BALF3, tagged with 6×His residues at the N terminus to enable purification, was cloned into transfer vector pBacPAK8-MTGFP and recombinant baculoviruses expressing the His-BALF3 protein were produced in Sf9 cells after cotransfection. Unlike the extract of cells mock infected or infected with the wild-type baculovirus, in Western blotting, that of cells infected with the recombinant His-BALF3 baculoviruses exhibited a clear major band and a minor band at approximately 75 and 38 kDa, respectively (Fig. 1B). According to the molecular weight predicted from the amino acid sequence, we consider that the protein with a mass of 75 kDa was the full-length His-BALF3 product. The His-BALF3 protein in the infected cell lysate was purified by interaction with nickel ions, and the lysate-resin mixture was washed by adding imidazole at a concentration of 50 mM to eliminate endogenous proteins with histidine residues. The soluble fractions were eluted by increasing the concentration of imidazole to 250 mM to dissociate the His-BALF3 protein from the resin, and proteins were visualized by SDS-PAGE and SYPRO Ruby staining (Fig. 1C).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Sequence alignment of putative conserved motifs in HHV terminase subunits and purification of EBV BALF3. (A) The amino acid (aa) sequences of EBV BALF3 and its homologues encoded by HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, HCMV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and KSHV were aligned by NPS@ (Network Protein Sequence Analysis; http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr). The numbering of amino acid residues is based on the BALF3 sequence, and the identical, strongly similar, and weakly similar amino acid residues are red, green, and blue, respectively. (B) The protein extracts of Sf9 cells were harvested after infection with the wild-type (WT) or recombinant His-BALF3 baculovirus at 28°C for 2 days and subjected to Western blotting with antibodies specific to His. MW, molecular mass; Mock, mock infection. (C) The His-BALF3 protein was purified from the extract of infected Sf9 cells with Ni-NTA resin, and the lysate-resin mixture was washed with 50 mM imidazole and then eluted in the presence of 250 mM imidazole. All of the soluble fractions were collected and subjected to SDS-PAGE with SYPRO Ruby staining. CL, cell lysate; FT, flowthrough; W, wash; E, elution.

Nuclease activity of EBV BALF3.

To analyze the biochemical properties of EBV BALF3, the nuclease activity of the His-BALF3 protein purified from the recombinant baculoviruses was assayed in vitro. The purified protein was incubated with pBS-TR containing a 538-bp terminal repeat fragment of the EBV genomic DNA, as the nuclease substrate, in the absence or presence of divalent cations, including Mg2+ and Mn2+, or ATP, and then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The nuclease activity of the terminase was measured by determining the amount of the open circular form of the plasmid converted from the supercoiled form, defined as a nicking reaction. In the presence of Mg2+, Mn2+, or ATP, the maximal rate of the nicking reaction was achieved at concentrations of 10, 0.1, and 20 mM, respectively (Fig. 2A to C). Comparison of the nicking levels showed that stimulation by ATP produced a greater amount of the open circular plasmid than either Mg2+ or Mn2+ (Fig. 2A to C), suggesting that ATP is more effective than the divalent cations in stimulating the nuclease activity of BALF3. Furthermore, the efficiency of the ATP-mediated nicking reaction was enhanced by Mg2+ at a concentration of 10 mM because the required concentration of ATP was lowered from 20 to 12 mM. This effect was not seen with Mn2+ at a concentration of 0.1 mM (Fig. 2D and E). Incubation with pBlueScript devoid of the terminal repeat fragment in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ and 12 mM ATP led to the decreasing nucleolytic efficiency of BALF3, compared to that for the pBS-TR incubation (Fig. 2F), confirming that the terminal repeat of the EBV genomic DNA is the target substrate of BALF3. These results show that EBV BALF3 possesses endonuclease activity that is dependent on Mg2+, Mn2+, and ATP individually; in addition, the rate of the endonucleolytic reaction is synergistically increased by ATP together with Mg2+.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Nuclease activity of EBV BALF3. Purified BALF3 protein was incubated with 0.5 μg pBS-TR and the indicated concentrations of MgCl2 (A), MnCl2 (B), or ATP (C) at 37°C for 1 h prior to agarose gel electrophoresis with EtBr staining. Under the same incubation conditions, the indicated concentrations of ATP were combined with either 10 mM MgCl2 (D) or 0.1 mM MnCl2 (E) to determine the nuclease activity of BALF3. (F) The nuclease activity of the purified BALF3 protein at the indicated doses was assayed in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 and 12 mM ATP with either pBS-TR or pBlueScript incubation. The intensity of each band was quantified by Gel-Pro Analyzer (Media Cybernetics) and is presented as a percentage. (G) Equal amounts of the purified wild-type (WT), zinc finger motif mutant (mutant 1), and ATP-binding motif mutant (mutant 2) His-BALF3 proteins were identified by Western blotting with antibodies specific to His. (H) The nuclease activity of the purified BALF3 proteins was assayed in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 and 12 or 20 mM ATP. The open circular, linear, and supercoiled forms of the plasmids are shown as OC, Lin, and SC, respectively. Digestion with HindIII was used as a control for the linear form of the plasmids. ddH2O, double-distilled water.

In addition, to determine whether contaminating proteins are present in the eluted fraction because proteins containing histidine residues are abundant in eukaryotic cells, including Sf9 cells, and endogenous proteins might interact with EBV BALF3, the coding region of the gene for BALF3 in pBacPAK8-MTGFP-His-BALF3 was mutated by replacement of the putative zinc finger and ATP-binding motifs with alanines, as shown in Fig. 1A, and the effects of these mutations on the nuclease activity were determined in vitro by a nuclease activity assay. Both the C173A C176A C199A H201A and G624A mutants exhibited significantly less endonuclease activity than the wild type (Fig. 2G and H), indicating the purity of the eluted BALF3 protein.

Expression of EBV BALF3 during the lytic cycle.

To determine whether EBV BALF3 is expressed in EBV-positive cells following induction of the lytic cycle, NA cell extracts were harvested at the times indicated within 72 h postinduction and subjected to qRT-PCR. During the lytic cycle, the BALF3 mRNA was detectable as early as 6 h postinduction and rose to the maximal level at 36 h postinduction (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, EBV lytic gene products, transactivator BZLF1 and DNA polymerase BALF5, were expressed in NA cells following TPA and SB treatment, confirming that the lytic cycle was activated (data not shown). According to a previous study with microarrays, the expression of the BALF3 gene in anti-IgG-induced Akata cells is reduced by less than 20% in the presence of phosphonoacetic acid (PAA), a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor, indicating that the expression of EBV BALF3 is relatively insensitive to PAA (65). In addition, analysis of the kinetic expression of mRNAs of lytic genes in TPA- and SB-induced NA cells shows that the immediate-early gene product BZLF1 increased clearly within 24 h postinduction, the early gene product BALF5 was expressed at the highest levels from 24 to 60 h postinduction, and the late gene product BLLF1 reached its maximal level at 60 h postinduction (data not shown). Accordingly, the results of the microarray analysis and the expression kinetics experiments suggest that EBV BALF3 may be classified as an early gene product.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Expression of EBV BALF3 in EBV-positive cells during the lytic cycle. The mRNA extracts of TW01 and NA cells were harvested at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h after induction with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB and subjected to qRT-PCR with primers corresponding to BALF3. The ratios of gene expression levels are shown as fold changes relative to the group of NA cells at 0 h postinduction. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations.

Subcellular localization of EBV BALF3.

To observe the distribution of EBV BALF3 in host cells, TW01 and NA cells were transiently transfected with pEGFP-C1-BALF3 prior to induction of the lytic cycle for 36 h and visualized by indirect immunofluorescence staining. In TW01 cells with or without TPA and SB treatment, BALF3 was located in the cytoplasm, for the most part, and a similar pattern was seen in NA cells without induction. After induction, BALF3 could be detected in the nuclei of NA cells (Fig. 4A and B). Moreover, subcellular fractionation revealed that the amount of BALF3 in the nuclear fraction was greater at 36 h postinduction than without induction (Fig. 4C). These results show that EBV BALF3 is translocated from the cytoplasm into the nucleus in EBV-positive cells during the lytic cycle.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Subcellular localization of EBV BALF3 in EBV-positive cells during the lytic cycle. TW01 and NA cells were transiently transfected with pEGFP-C1-BALF3, followed by induction with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB for 36 h, and the images shown were obtained by indirect immunofluorescence staining and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (A) and a confocal microscope (B). The detection of EBV BMRF1 with the specific antibody indicates lytic cycle activation, and the nuclei of the cells were stained with Hoechst 33258. (C) Protein extracts of cells expressing GFP-BALF3 were separated into input (I), cytosolic (C), and nuclear (N) fractions and subjected to Western blotting. After electrophoresis, GFP-BALF3 was detected by an antibody specific to GFP, and PARP1 and α-tubulin were used as markers for the nucleus and the cytoplasm, respectively.

Contribution of EBV BALF3 to virion production.

To investigate what part EBV BALF3 plays during the lytic cycle, knockdown of BALF3 was achieved with a siRNA. According to the nucleotide sequence of the EBV genomic DNA reported in NCBI GenBank (accession no. AJ507799) (66), sense strands of siRNAs corresponding to the BALF3 mRNA were designed siBALF3-1 (5′-CACUGGCAUCUAGCCAGCAAAUUCU-3′), siBALF3-2 (5′-GCCGCCUUUGAGAAUUCCAAGUACA-3′), and siBALF3-3 (5′-GGGCAAGGCUGACUCACCUGUUUGA-3′). To determine the efficiency of knockdown by these siRNAs, NA cells were transfected with siBALF3-1, -2, or -3 prior to induction of the lytic cycle, resulting in the suppression of BALF3 expression in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). In addition, there was no significant effect on the expression of other lytic gene products, including the transactivators BZLF1 and BRLF1, the DNA polymerase BALF5, and the DNA polymerase processivity factor BMRF1, in the presence of these BALF3 siRNAs (Fig. 5A). Previous studies have proven that the terminase participates in DNA cleavage, as well as packaging, which is required for lytic replication. To explore whether EBV BALF3 is involved in the production of infectious virions, NA cell supernatants were harvested after the transfection of each form of siBALF3 at 72 h postinduction, and the number of virions was determined by qPCR with BALF5 gene detection, showing that siBALF3-1, -2, and -3 were capable of reducing virus release by up to approximately 82, 66, and 57%, respectively, compared to the negative control (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, to observe the formation of intracellular capsids, cells containing each form of siBALF3 were ultrathin sectioned at 48 h postinduction and examined by transmission electron microscopy. Three types of capsids have been defined: the B-type capsid, which retains an inner shell that is constructed from scaffolding proteins and is devoid of viral DNA; the C-type capsid, which contains viral DNA and undergoes inner shell removal and outer shell structure stabilization; and the A-type capsid, in which the inner shell is eliminated but no viral DNA is packaged. B-type capsids had accumulated in the nucleus in the presence of each form of siBALF3, and the proportions of A- and C-type capsids were decreased (Fig. 6A and Table 1). In addition, three types of capsids were purified and separated by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (Fig. 6B), revealing that BALF3 knockdown caused a decrease in the amount of capsids (Fig. 6C) and the proportions of A- and C-type capsids to B-type capsid (Fig. 6D), which is consistent with the appearance of transmission electron microscopy. These results show that EBV BALF3 is involved in capsid maturation and the production of mature virions.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Production of mature virions in EBV-positive cells with BALF3 knockdown. (A) NA cells were transiently transfected with 10 nM Negative Control Duplexes (NC) or the indicated concentrations of siBALF3-1, -2, or -3 prior to treatment with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB, and mRNA extracts were harvested at 24 h and subjected to RT-PCR with primers corresponding to BALF3 and other lytic gene products (BZLF1, BRLF1, BALF5, and BMRF1). The amplicons were displayed by agarose gel electrophoresis with EtBr staining. ddH2O, double-distilled water. (B) NA cell supernatants were collected after the transfection of each siRNA at a concentration of 10 nM at 72 h postinduction, and the number of virions was determined by qPCR with BALF5 primers. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Student's t test was used to determine the difference between two groups. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.001.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Maturation of capsids in EBV-positive cells with BALF3 knockdown. NA cells were treated with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB after the transient transfection of 10 nM Negative Control Duplexes (NC), siBALF3-1, siBALF3-2, or siBALF3-3. (A) At 48 h postinduction, the cells were fixed and embedded in Spurr's resin and the samples were ultrathin sectioned and subjected to transmission electron microscopy. The black arrowheads, white arrows, and black arrows indicate A-, B-, and C-type capsids, respectively. Nuc, nucleus; Cyt, cytoplasm. The scale bar corresponds to 500 nm. (B) At 48 h postinduction, capsids were purified from the cells with NC transfection and separated by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation, and the fractions were subjected to Western blotting analysis with the antibody specific to EBV VCA. (C and D) Western blotting analysis of fractions obtained by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation compares the amount of capsids harvested from TPA- and SB-treated cells harboring NC, siBALF3-1, siBALF3-2, or siBALF3-3 to each other. The intensity of each band was quantified by Gel-Pro Analyzer and is presented as a relative fold change.

TABLE 1.

Types of capsids in EBV-positive cells with BALF3 knockdown

siRNA No. (%) of capsidsa
Type A Type B Type C All types
NCb 34 (9.5) 180 (50.28) 144 (40.22) 358
siBALF3-1 5 (3.12) 132 (82.5) 23 (14.38) 160
siBALF3-2 12 (5.97) 140 (69.65) 49 (24.38) 201
siBALF3-3 11 (7.64) 86 (59.72) 47 (32.64) 144
a

The capsids in the transmission electron micrograph of the NA cell nucleus were counted. The numbers of the cells examined by transmission electron microscopy following NC, siBALF3-1, siBALF3-2, and siBALF3-3 transfection were 43, 45, 32, and 21, respectively.

b

NC, Negative Control Duplexes.

Contribution of EBV BALF3 to viral DNA replication.

To determine whether EBV BALF3 can affect viral DNA synthesis during lytic replication, NA cells transfected with each form of siBALF3 were harvested at 24 and 48 h postinduction and the EBV genome copy number was measured by qPCR with BALF5 gene detection. The intracellular EBV genome copy number decreased by up to approximately 92% for siBALF3-1, 89% for siBALF3-2, and 88% for siBALF3-3 at 24 h postinduction and approximately 93% for siBALF3-1, 87% for siBALF3-2, and 70% for siBALF3-3 at 48 h postinduction, compared to the negative control (Fig. 7B). In addition, these siBALF3 clones retained the property of gene silencing up to 48 h in this study (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, the use of Gardella gel analysis to detect the amount of episomal and linear EBV DNA in siBALF3-transfected NA cells at 48 h postinduction revealed that episomes were converted to concatemers after induction of the lytic cycle, and suppression of BALF3 expression led to reduced generation of concatemers (Fig. 7C). These results show that EBV BALF3 participates in viral DNA synthesis and may be involved in the process of rolling-circle replication.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Examination of viral DNA replication in EBV-positive cells with BALF3 knockdown. (A) NA cells were transiently transfected with 10 nM Negative Control Duplexes (NC), siBALF3-1, siBALF3-2, or siBALF3-3 prior to treatment with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB, and mRNA extracts were harvested at 24 and 48 h and subjected to RT-PCR with primers corresponding to BALF3. The amplicons were displayed by agarose gel electrophoresis with EtBr staining. ddH2O, double-distilled water. (B) NA cells were extracted after the transfection of each siRNA at a concentration of 10 nM at 24 and 48 h postinduction, and the EBV genome copy number was measured by qPCR with the BALF5 primers. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Student's t test was used to determine the difference between two groups. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.001. (C) NA cells were transiently transfected with 10 nM each siRNA, followed by induction. At 48 h postinduction, the cells were extracted and separated in a Gardella gel. After electrophoresis, the gel was subjected to Southern blotting and hybridization with the 32P-radiolabeled random-primed EBV BamHI-W fragment. B95-8, induced with 40 ng/ml TPA and 3 mM SB, and Raji cells were used as the positive controls of linear and episomal EBV DNA, respectively.

DISCUSSION

To investigate the characteristics of the endonuclease activity of EBV BALF3, we examined the effects of divalent cations and ATP as cofactors in vitro and determined that Mg2+, Mn2+, and ATP are able to regulate this enzymatic activity. In the case of bacteriophage λ, it has been reported that divalent cations, including Mg2+ and Mn2+, are required for the cos cleavage activity of λ terminase in vitro, but Ba2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Sr2+, and Zn2+ are not as effective (67, 68). In addition, ATP plays multiple roles in DNA cleavage and packaging. ATP is necessary to regulate the assembly of the terminase onto cos, stimulate the cos nicking reaction, and increase the reaction rate of the endonucleolytic process (67–72). The hydrolysis of ATP promotes not only the separation of DNA strands with cohesive ends after DNA cleavage but the translocation of unit length genomes into procapsids; however, it is not required for the endonucleolytic reaction, based on a study with nonhydrolyzable analogs (69, 73). Previous investigations of the catalytic domains of HHV terminases have revealed that HCMV UL56 has bountiful ATPase activity and contains a putative Walker A motif (GXXXXGK[T/S]), known as an ATP-binding motif, in the C-terminal half. This was verified by replacing the glycine residue at amino acid 714 with alanine to reduce the efficiency of ATP hydrolysis up to approximately 70%. Changing the glycine residue at amino acid 714, rather than the lysine residue at amino acid 715, is more effective in the reduction of efficiency, suggesting that the glycine, and not the lysine, residue of the putative Walker A motif in HHVs is vital for ATP binding (19, 64, 74). In our study, we found that ATP could stimulate the endonuclease activity of BALF3 and has a dramatic effect, compared to Mg2+ and Mn2+; furthermore, alanine substitution of the glycine residue at amino acid 624 of BALF3 reduced the endonucleolytic reaction to a significant extent in the presence of ATP. Consistent with the hypothesis for the ATP binding of HCMV UL56 (64), there is probably another amino acid residue of BALF3 involved in this function, as well as glycine 624. Taking these results together, EBV BALF3 may be considered an ATP-dependent endonuclease with an ATP-binding motif within the C-terminal half.

In addition to the ATP-binding motif as discussed above, HCMV UL56 has been suggested to possess a zinc finger motif between amino acids 191 and 219 and two leucine zipper motifs within amino acids 688 to 710 and 742 to 766 (63, 75, 76). From an analysis of the amino acid sequence alignment of HCMV UL56 and EBV BALF3, BALF3 was thought to possess a hypothetical zinc finger motif in the N-terminal half. Here, the endonuclease activity assay of BALF3 illustrated in Fig. 2H reveals that the endonucleolytic reaction was obviously reduced by the alanine replacement in the hypothetical zinc finger motif, implying that the region is involved in the DNA cleavage process, but it remains to be determined whether the region is responsible for the DNA binding ability of BALF3. HCMV UL56 exists as a dimer formed by the association of two ring-like structures (77), and it has been suggested that the leucine zipper motif in the C-terminal half might be required for dimerization (63). In addition, dimerization of two zinc finger nucleases is necessary for the efficient double-stranded DNA cleavage reaction (78, 79). This could explain the ability of the purified BALF3 protein to convert the supercoiled plasmid DNA to an open circular form, known as nicking reaction, indicating that EBV BALF3 may exist as a monomer in the expression and purification system used in this study. Although a putative leucine zipper motif was found between amino acids 599 and 620 in the C-terminal half of BALF3, corresponding to amino acids 688 to 710 of HCMV UL56, the exact function of this domain in EBV and other HHVs remains unclear.

In the analysis of nuclease activity, we showed that EBV BALF3 has the capacity to nick DNA bearing the terminal repeat of the EBV genome. However, Fig. 2F shows that BALF3 also generated a nick in the parental plasmid DNA vector, pBlueScript, without insertion of the terminal repeat fragment although the efficiency of the enzymatic activity was slightly lower, suggesting that BALF3 might catalyze the endonucleolytic reaction in a nonspecific manner. Likewise, HCMV UL56 cleaves plasmid DNA without the α sequence in vitro (22) and expression of the bacteriophage T4 terminase, gp17, results in the random cleavage of both the resident plasmid and the Escherichia coli genomic DNA in vivo (80). Moreover, the cleavage of gp17 occurs preferentially on transcriptionally active DNA, which generates a single-stranded DNA structure (80). As mentioned previously, the affinity of HSV-1 UL28 binding to the cleavage/packaging signals rises when denatured DNA is used as the substrate. These findings are supported by previous studies, implying that a recombination event, as well as the terminase, is involved in the initiation of DNA cleavage (48, 81). Therefore, it is possible that the alternative DNA structure of the signal elements in the terminal repeat generated spontaneously or by other proteins improves the attachment and fidelity of EBV BALF3 for concatemers.

In HHVs, the processes of lytic replication, including DNA cleavage and packaging, occurs in the host cell nucleus, and the terminase complex therefore must translocate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. Nuclear translocation of the terminase complex has been observed in several HHVs, such as HSV-1 and HCMV. HSV-1 UL28 is transported into the nucleus following coexpression with HSV-1 UL15 (82). Moreover, HSV-1 UL15 contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS), PKKRAKV, between amino acids 182 and 189, and this is required for the import of HSV-1 UL28 (83). HCMV UL56 has its own NLS, RRVRATRKRPRR, at amino acids 816 to 827, and this interacts with cellular hSRP1α to mediate the nuclear translocation (84). By comparison of amino acid sequences from EBV BALF3 and its homologous terminase subunits, the NLS of HCMV UL56 is not conserved in other HHVs, including HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, EBV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and KSHV. In accordance with the sequence alignment, EBV BALF3 was distributed predominantly in the cytoplasm when it was expressed alone in host cells. Furthermore, BALF3 entered the nucleus after induction of the lytic cycle, suggesting that there are other lytic viral proteins that interact with EBV BALF3 and direct its nuclear translocation. In addition, indirect immunofluorescence staining shows that the approximately 10% of the NA cells expressed GFP-BALF3 and BMRF1 simultaneously and not all of the GFP-BALF3-expressing NA cells entered the lytic cycle, explaining why BALF3 was still abundant in the cytoplasmic fraction after induction of the lytic cycle.

Both the HSV-1 and HCMV terminases have been shown to be essential for DNA packaging. Here, interference with BALF3 expression led to defective capsid maturation, resulting in the host cell containing an increased percentage of capsids with inner shell structures in the nucleus, indicating that EBV BALF3 plays an important role in DNA packaging. Because BALF3 is able to nick DNA and is required for packaging of the viral genome into procapsids, we suggest that EBV BALF3 may be a terminase subunit. On the other hand, BALF3 knockdown suppressed viral DNA synthesis during the lytic cycle, but the relationship between the terminase and lytic DNA replication in EBV remains enigmatic. Previous studies have reported that inhibition of HCMV UL89 expression reduces viral DNA synthesis (23); in contrast, the effect is not significant in either UL28 or UL15 mutant HSV-1 (18, 85). Recently, an EBV genome lacking the genes for both BGRF1 and BDRF1, a homologue of HSV-1 UL15, and a putative partner of EBV BALF3, produced a clearly lower average number of capsids than the wild type, suggesting that BGRF1/BDRF1 is responsible for capsid formation and may be involved in assembly or stability (50). Likewise, we observed that the nuclei of induced cells harboring siBALF3, especially siBALF3-1, contained fewer capsids than the negative control, although the population of the cells entering the lytic cycle was up to approximately 85% in each case. In previous studies, EBV-producing cells treated with the DNA synthesis inhibitor PAA failed to express viral capsid antigens but not early antigens (86, 87). Accordingly, the faulty capsid formation attributed to deficient BALF3, as well as BGRF1/BDRF1, may be related to the suppression of viral DNA synthesis. Therefore, we speculate that EBV BALF3 might participate in the viral DNA replication process directly or may be associated with other viral proteins, such as BGRF1/BDRF1, and so influence the efficiency of DNA synthesis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tim J. Harrison of University College London for critical reading and editing of the manuscript. We are grateful to Chung-Ming Chang and Min-Shi Lee of National Health Research Institutes for technical assistance and also acknowledge the technical services provided by the Core Instrument Center of National Health Research Institutes.

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC96-3112-B-400-010, NSC97-3112-B-400-007, NSC98-3112-B-400-002, NSC99-3112-B-400-009, NSC101-2325-B-400-023, and NSC102-2325-B-400-021) and the National Health Research Institutes (CA-096-PP-24, CA-097-PP-18, CA-098-PP-13, CA-099-PP-13, CA-100-PP-18, CA-101-PP-18, and CA-102-PP-19), Taiwan.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 19 February 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nonoyama M, Pagano JS. 1972. Separation of Epstein-Barr virus DNA from large chromosomal DNA in non-virus-producing cells. Nat. New Biol. 238:169–171. 10.1038/newbio238169a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nonoyama M, Tanaka A. 1975. Plasmid DNA as a possible state of Epstein-Barr virus genomes in nonproductive cells. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 39:807–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adams A, Lindahl T. 1975. Epstein-Barr virus genomes with properties of circular DNA molecules in carrier cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72:1477–1481. 10.1073/pnas.72.4.1477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yates J, Warren N, Reisman D, Sugden B. 1984. A cis-acting element from the Epstein-Barr viral genome that permits stable replication of recombinant plasmids in latently infected cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81:3806–3810. 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yates JL, Warren N, Sugden B. 1985. Stable replication of plasmids derived from Epstein-Barr virus in various mammalian cells. Nature 313:812–815. 10.1038/313812a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adams A. 1987. Replication of latent Epstein-Barr virus genomes in Raji cells. J. Virol. 61:1743–1746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schepers A, Ritzi M, Bousset K, Kremmer E, Yates JL, Harwood J, Diffley JF, Hammerschmidt W. 2001. Human origin recognition complex binds to the region of the latent origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus. EMBO J. 20:4588–4602. 10.1093/emboj/20.16.4588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaudhuri B, Xu H, Todorov I, Dutta A, Yates JL. 2001. Human DNA replication initiation factors, ORC and MCM, associate with oriP of Epstein-Barr virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:10085–10089. 10.1073/pnas.181347998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhar SK, Yoshida K, Machida Y, Khaira P, Chaudhuri B, Wohlschlegel JA, Leffak M, Yates J, Dutta A. 2001. Replication from oriP of Epstein-Barr virus requires human ORC and is inhibited by geminin. Cell 106:287–296. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00458-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moriyama K, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Obuse C, Tsurimoto T, Masai H. 2012. Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1)-dependent recruitment of origin recognition complex (Orc) on oriP of Epstein-Barr virus with purified proteins: stimulation by Cdc6 through its direct interaction with EBNA1. J. Biol. Chem. 287:23977–23994. 10.1074/jbc.M112.368456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hammerschmidt W, Sugden B. 1988. Identification and characterization of oriLyt, a lytic origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus. Cell 55:427–433. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90028-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hammerschmidt W, Sugden B. 1989. Genetic analysis of immortalizing functions of Epstein-Barr virus in human B lymphocytes. Nature 340:393–397. 10.1038/340393a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Addison C, Rixon FJ, Preston VG. 1990. Herpes simplex virus type 1 UL28 gene product is important for the formation of mature capsids. J. Gen. Virol. 71:2377–2384. 10.1099/0022-1317-71-10-2377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poon AP, Roizman B. 1993. Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant of the UL15 open reading frame of herpes simplex virus 1. J. Virol. 67:4497–4503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bogner E, Reschke M, Reis B, Mockenhaupt T, Radsak K. 1993. Identification of the gene product encoded by ORF UL56 of the human cytomegalovirus genome. Virology 196:290–293. 10.1006/viro.1993.1477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Visalli RJ, Nicolosi DM, Irven KL, Goshorn B, Khan T, Visalli MA. 2007. The varicella-zoster virus DNA encapsidation genes: identification and characterization of the putative terminase subunits. Virus Res. 129:200–211. 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Underwood MR, Harvey RJ, Stanat SC, Hemphill ML, Miller T, Drach JC, Townsend LB, Biron KK. 1998. Inhibition of human cytomegalovirus DNA maturation by a benzimidazole ribonucleoside is mediated through the UL89 gene product. J. Virol. 72:717–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tengelsen LA, Pederson NE, Shaver PR, Wathen MW, Homa FL. 1993. Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA cleavage and encapsidation require the product of the UL28 gene: isolation and characterization of two UL28 deletion mutants. J. Virol. 67:3470–3480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hwang JS, Bogner E. 2002. ATPase activity of the terminase subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. J. Biol. Chem. 277:6943–6948. 10.1074/jbc.M108984200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bogner E, Radsak K, Stinski MF. 1998. The gene product of human cytomegalovirus open reading frame UL56 binds the pac motif and has specific nuclease activity. J. Virol. 72:2259–2264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baines JD, Poon AP, Rovnak J, Roizman B. 1994. The herpes simplex virus 1 UL15 gene encodes two proteins and is required for cleavage of genomic viral DNA. J. Virol. 68:8118–8124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scheffczik H, Savva CG, Holzenburg A, Kolesnikova L, Bogner E. 2002. The terminase subunits pUL56 and pUL89 of human cytomegalovirus are DNA-metabolizing proteins with toroidal structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1695–1703. 10.1093/nar/30.7.1695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thoma C, Bogner E. 2010. Short hairpin RNAs specific to human cytomegalovirus terminase subunit pUL89 prevent viral maturation. Antivir. Ther. 15:391–400. 10.3851/IMP1536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beard PM, Taus NS, Baines JD. 2002. DNA cleavage and packaging proteins encoded by genes U(L)28, U(L)15, and U(L)33 of herpes simplex virus type 1 form a complex in infected cells. J. Virol. 76:4785–4791. 10.1128/JVI.76.10.4785-4791.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang K, Baines JD. 2006. The putative terminase subunit of herpes simplex virus 1 encoded by UL28 is necessary and sufficient to mediate interaction between pUL15 and pUL33. J. Virol. 80:5733–5739. 10.1128/JVI.00125-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jacobson JG, Yang K, Baines JD, Homa FL. 2006. Linker insertion mutations in the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL28 gene: effects on UL28 interaction with UL15 and UL33 and identification of a second-site mutation in the UL15 gene that suppresses a lethal UL28 mutation. J. Virol. 80:12312–12323. 10.1128/JVI.01766-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Visalli RJ, Knepper J, Goshorn B, Vanover K, Burnside DM, Irven K, McGauley R, Visalli M. 2009. Characterization of the varicella-zoster virus ORF25 gene product: pORF25 interacts with multiple DNA encapsidation proteins. Virus Res. 144:58–64. 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Borst EM, Kleine-Albers J, Gabaev I, Babic M, Wagner K, Binz A, Degenhardt I, Kalesse M, Jonjic S, Bauerfeind R, Messerle M. 2013. The human cytomegalovirus UL51 protein is essential for viral genome cleavage-packaging and interacts with the terminase subunits pUL56 and pUL89. J. Virol. 87:1720–1732. 10.1128/JVI.01955-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wagner MJ, Summers WC. 1978. Structure of the joint region and the termini of the DNA of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol. 27:374–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grafstrom RH, Alwine JC, Steinhart WL, Hill CW. 1975. Terminal repetitions in herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 39:679–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sheldrick P, Berthelot N. 1975. Inverted repetitions in the chromosome of herpes simplex virus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 39:667–678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wadsworth S, Jacob RJ, Roizman B. 1975. Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA. II. Size, composition, and arrangement of inverted terminal repetitions. J. Virol. 15:1487–1497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wadsworth S, Hayward GS, Roizman B. 1976. Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA. V. Terminally repetitive sequences. J. Virol. 17:503–512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Varmuza SL, Smiley JR. 1985. Signals for site-specific cleavage of HSV DNA: maturation involves two separate cleavage events at sites distal to the recognition sequences. Cell 41:793–802. 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80060-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Deiss LP, Chou J, Frenkel N. 1986. Functional domains within the a sequence involved in the cleavage-packaging of herpes simplex virus DNA. J. Virol. 59:605–618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deiss LP, Frenkel N. 1986. Herpes simplex virus amplicon: cleavage of concatemeric DNA is linked to packaging and involves amplification of the terminally reiterated a sequence. J. Virol. 57:933–941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mocarski ES, Liu AC, Spaete RR. 1987. Structure and variability of the a sequence in the genome of human cytomegalovirus (Towne strain). J. Gen. Virol. 68:2223–2230. 10.1099/0022-1317-68-8-2223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van den Berg FM, van Ooyen AJ, Volkers H, Walboomers JM. 1984. Heterogeneity in subregions of the terminal repeats of herpes simplex virus type 2 DNA. Intervirology 21:96–103. 10.1159/000149507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Spaete RR, Mocarski ES. 1985. The a sequence of the cytomegalovirus genome functions as a cleavage/packaging signal for herpes simplex virus defective genomes. J. Virol. 54:817–824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Albrecht M, Darai G, Flugel RM. 1985. Analysis of the genomic termini of tupaia herpesvirus DNA by restriction mapping and nucleotide sequencing. J. Virol. 56:466–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Davison AJ. 1984. Structure of the genome termini of varicella-zoster virus. J. Gen. Virol. 65:1969–1977. 10.1099/0022-1317-65-11-1969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bankier AT, Diertrich W, Baer R, Barrell BG, Colbere-Garapin F, Fleckenstein B, Bodemer W. 1985. Terminal repetitive sequences in herpesvirus saimiri virion DNA. J. Virol. 55:133–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marks JR, Spector DH. 1988. Replication of the murine cytomegalovirus genome: structure and role of the termini in the generation and cleavage of concatenates. Virology 162:98–107. 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90398-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hammerschmidt W, Ludwig H, Buhk HJ. 1988. Specificity of cleavage in replicative-form DNA of bovine herpesvirus 1. J. Virol. 62:1355–1363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Broll H, Buhk HJ, Zimmermann W, Goltz M. 1999. Structure and function of the prDNA and the genomic termini of the γ2-herpesvirus bovine herpesvirus type 4. J. Gen. Virol. 80:979–986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McVoy MA, Nixon DE, Adler SP, Mocarski ES. 1998. Sequences within the herpesvirus-conserved pac1 and pac2 motifs are required for cleavage and packaging of the murine cytomegalovirus genome. J. Virol. 72:48–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adelman K, Salmon B, Baines JD. 2001. Herpes simplex virus DNA packaging sequences adopt novel structures that are specifically recognized by a component of the cleavage and packaging machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:3086–3091. 10.1073/pnas.061555698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zimmermann J, Hammerschmidt W. 1995. Structure and role of the terminal repeats of Epstein-Barr virus in processing and packaging of virion DNA. J. Virol. 69:3147–3155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Feederle R, Shannon-Lowe C, Baldwin G, Delecluse HJ. 2005. Defective infectious particles and rare packaged genomes produced by cells carrying terminal-repeat-negative Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol. 79:7641–7647. 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7641-7647.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pavlova S, Feederle R, Gartner K, Fuchs W, Granzow H, Delecluse HJ. 2013. An Epstein-Barr virus mutant produces immunogenic defective particles devoid of viral DNA. J. Virol. 87:2011–2022. 10.1128/JVI.02533-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin CT, Wong CI, Chan WY, Tzung KW, Ho JK, Hsu MM, Chuang SM. 1990. Establishment and characterization of two nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. Lab. Invest. 62:713–724 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chang Y, Tung CH, Huang YT, Lu J, Chen JY, Tsai CH. 1999. Requirement for cell-to-cell contact in Epstein-Barr virus infection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and keratinocytes. J. Virol. 73:8857–8866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee DF, Chen CC, Hsu TA, Juang JL. 2000. A baculovirus superinfection system: efficient vehicle for gene transfer into Drosophila S2 cells. J. Virol. 74:11873–11880. 10.1128/JVI.74.24.11873-11880.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baer R, Bankier AT, Biggin MD, Deininger PL, Farrell PJ, Gibson TJ, Hatfull G, Hudson GS, Satchwell SC, Seguin C, Tuffnell PS, Barrell BG. 1984. DNA sequence and expression of the B95-8 Epstein-Barr virus genome. Nature 310:207–211. 10.1038/310207a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lin SF, Hsu TY, Liu MY, Lin LS, Yang HL, Chen JY, Yang CS. 1995. Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus DNase and its interaction with the major DNA binding protein. Virology 208:712–722. 10.1006/viro.1995.1203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen YJ, Tsai WH, Chen YL, Ko YC, Chou SP, Chen JY, Lin SF. 2011. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) Rta-mediated EBV and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic reactivations in 293 cells. PLoS One 6:e17809. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Baldwin AS., Jr 1996. The NF-κB and IκB proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:649–681. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chang Y, Cheng SD, Tsai CH. 2002. Chromosomal integration of Epstein-Barr virus genomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Head Neck 24:143–150. 10.1002/hed.10039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pulvertaft RJV. 1965. A study of malignant tumours in Nigeria by short-term tissue culture. J. Clin. Pathol. 18:261–273. 10.1136/jcp.18.3.261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gardella T, Medveczky P, Sairenji T, Mulder C. 1984. Detection of circular and linear herpesvirus DNA molecules in mammalian cells by gel electrophoresis. J. Virol. 50:248–254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Miller G, Shope T, Lisco H, Stitt D, Lipman M. 1972. Epstein-Barr virus: transformation, cytopathic changes, and viral antigens in squirrel monkey and marmoset leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69:383–387. 10.1073/pnas.69.2.383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lin Z, Wang X, Strong MJ, Concha M, Baddoo M, Xu G, Baribault C, Fewell C, Hulme W, Hedges D, Taylor CM, Flemington EK. 2013. Whole-genome sequencing of the Akata and Mutu Epstein-Barr virus strains. J. Virol. 87:1172–1182. 10.1128/JVI.02517-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Champier G, Couvreux A, Hantz S, Rametti A, Mazeron MC, Bouaziz S, Denis F, Alain S. 2008. Putative functional domains of human cytomegalovirus pUL56 involved in dimerization and benzimidazole D-ribonucleoside activity. Antivir. Ther. 13:643–654 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Scholz B, Rechter S, Drach JC, Townsend LB, Bogner E. 2003. Identification of the ATP-binding site in the terminase subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:1426–1433. 10.1093/nar/gkg229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lu CC, Jeng YY, Tsai CH, Liu MY, Yeh SW, Hsu TY, Chen MR. 2006. Genome-wide transcription program and expression of the Rta responsive gene of Epstein-Barr virus. Virology 345:358–372. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Arrand JR, Rymo L, Walsh JE, Bjorck E, Lindahl T, Griffin BE. 1981. Molecular cloning of the complete Epstein-Barr virus genome as a set of overlapping restriction endonuclease fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:2999–3014. 10.1093/nar/9.13.2999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Becker A, Gold M. 1978. Enzymatic breakage of the cohesive end site of phage λ DNA: terminase (ter) reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75:4199–4203. 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tomka MA, Catalano CE. 1993. Physical and kinetic characterization of the DNA packaging enzyme from bacteriophage λ. J. Biol. Chem. 268:3056–3065 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Higgins RR, Lucko HJ, Becker A. 1988. Mechanism of cos DNA cleavage by bacteriophage λ terminase: multiple roles of ATP. Cell 54:765–775. 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)91021-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cue D, Feiss M. 1993. The role of cosB, the binding site for terminase, the DNA packaging enzyme of bacteriophage λ, in the nicking reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 234:594–609. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Higgins RR, Becker A. 1994. Chromosome end formation in phage λ, catalyzed by terminase, is controlled by two DNA elements of cos, cosN and R3, and by ATP. EMBO J. 13:6152–6161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Higgins RR, Becker A. 1995. Interaction of terminase, the DNA packaging enzyme of phage λ, with its cos DNA substrate. J. Mol. Biol. 252:31–46. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Becker A, Murialdo H. 1990. Bacteriophage lambda DNA: the beginning of the end. J. Bacteriol. 172:2819–2824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ. 1982. Distantly related sequences in the α- and β-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1:945–951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Krosky PM, Underwood MR, Turk SR, Feng KW, Jain RK, Ptak RG, Westerman AC, Biron KK, Townsend LB, Drach JC. 1998. Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to benzimidazole ribonucleosides maps to two open reading frames: UL89 and UL56. J. Virol. 72:4721–4728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bogner E. 2002. Human cytomegalovirus terminase as a target for antiviral chemotherapy. Rev. Med. Virol. 12:115–127. 10.1002/rmv.344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Savva CG, Holzenburg A, Bogner E. 2004. Insights into the structure of human cytomegalovirus large terminase subunit pUL56. FEBS Lett. 563:135–140. 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00283-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mani M, Smith J, Kandavelou K, Berg JM, Chandrasegaran S. 2005. Binding of two zinc finger nuclease monomers to two specific sites is required for effective double-strand DNA cleavage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 334:1191–1197. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Smith J, Bibikova M, Whitby FG, Reddy AR, Chandrasegaran S, Carroll D. 2000. Requirements for double-strand cleavage by chimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:3361–3369. 10.1093/nar/28.17.3361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bhattacharyya SP, Rao VB. 1993. A novel terminase activity associated with the DNA packaging protein gp17 of bacteriophage T4. Virology 196:34–44. 10.1006/viro.1993.1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mosig G, Ghosal D, Bock S. 1981. Interactions between the maturation protein gp17 and the single-stranded DNA binding protein gp32 initiate DNA packaging and compete with initiation of secondary DNA replication forks in phage T4. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 64:139–150 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Koslowski KM, Shaver PR, Casey JT, II, Wilson T, Yamanaka G, Sheaffer AK, Tenney DJ, Pederson NE. 1999. Physical and functional interactions between the herpes simplex virus UL15 and UL28 DNA cleavage and packaging proteins. J. Virol. 73:1704–1707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yang K, Homa F, Baines JD. 2007. Putative terminase subunits of herpes simplex virus 1 form a complex in the cytoplasm and interact with portal protein in the nucleus. J. Virol. 81:6419–6433. 10.1128/JVI.00047-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Giesen K, Radsak K, Bogner E. 2000. The potential terminase subunit of human cytomegalovirus, pUL56, is translocated into the nucleus by its own nuclear localization signal and interacts with importin α. J. Gen. Virol. 81:2231–2244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Przech AJ, Yu D, Weller SK. 2003. Point mutations in exon I of the herpes simplex virus putative terminase subunit, UL15, indicate that the most conserved residues are essential for cleavage and packaging. J. Virol. 77:9613–9621. 10.1128/JVI.77.17.9613-9621.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nyormoi O, Thorley-Lawson DA, Elkington J, Strominger JL. 1976. Differential effect of phosphonoacetic acid on the expression of Epstein-Barr viral antigens and virus production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73:1745–1748. 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Summers WC, Klein G. 1976. Inhibition of Epstein-Barr virus DNA synthesis and late gene expression by phosphonoacetic acid. J. Virol. 18:151–155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tsai CH, Williams MV, Glaser R. 1991. Characterization of two monoclonal antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus diffuse early antigen which react to two different epitopes and have different biological function. J. Virol. Methods 33:47–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Newcomb WW, Homa FL, Brown JC. 2006. Herpes simplex virus capsid structure: DNA packaging protein UL25 is located on the external surface of the capsid near the vertices. J. Virol. 80:6286–6294. 10.1128/JVI.02648-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nellissery JK, Szczepaniak R, Lamberti C, Weller SK. 2007. A putative leucine zipper within the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL6 protein is required for portal ring formation. J. Virol. 81:8868–8877. 10.1128/JVI.00739-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES