Abstract
The survival of cellular organisms depends on the faithful replication and transmission of DNA. Regulatory factor X (RFX) transcription factors are well conserved in animals and fungi, but their functions are diverse, ranging from the DNA damage response to ciliary gene regulation. We investigated the role of the sole RFX transcription factor, RFX1, in the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Deletion of rfx1 resulted in multiple defects in hyphal growth, conidiation, virulence, and sexual development. Deletion mutants of rfx1 were more sensitive to various types of DNA damage than the wild-type strain. Septum formation was inhibited and micronuclei were produced in the rfx1 deletion mutants. The results of the neutral comet assay demonstrated that disruption of rfx1 function caused spontaneous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The transcript levels of genes involved in DNA DSB repair were upregulated in the rfx1 deletion mutants. DNA DSBs produced micronuclei and delayed septum formation in F. graminearum. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged RFX1 localized in nuclei and exhibited high expression levels in growing hyphae and conidiophores, where nuclear division was actively occurring. RNA-sequencing-based transcriptomic analysis revealed that RFX1 suppressed the expression of many genes, including those required for the repair of DNA damage. Taken together, these findings indicate that the transcriptional repressor rfx1 performs crucial roles during normal cell growth by maintaining genome integrity.
INTRODUCTION
The propagation of cellular organisms depends on the accurate replication and transmission of DNA from one cell to its daughters. However, the DNA of organisms is continually subjected to damage from exogenous and endogenous sources. The DNA damage response has evolved to achieve genome integrity. In response to DNA damage, cells arrest the cell cycle and induce the expression of a set of proteins that facilitate DNA repair through a DNA damage-responsive signal transduction pathway. Components of this pathway have been the subjects of intensive investigation in model organisms (1).
Regulatory factor X1 (RFX1) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScRFX1) is a transcription factor (TF) that binds to promoters of target genes involved in DNA repair (2). ScRFX1 recruits the general repressors SSN6 and TUP1 to inhibit the transcription of target genes. In response to DNA damage, MEC1 is activated through an unknown mechanism. Activated MEC1 phosphorylates RAD53 which, in turn, phosphorylates DUN1 kinase. When ScRFX1 is phosphorylated in a DUN1-dependent manner, it loses its DNA-binding capacity. This process leads to the transcriptional activation of target genes, such as ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs). Increased RNR expression facilitates efficient DNA repair because RNRs supply deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), which are precursors for DNA repair (3, 4). Therefore, disruption of ScRFX1 function triggers the derepression of RNRs, which makes the cells more resistant to DNA damage (2, 5, 6).
The DNA-binding domain of ScRFX1 shares high sequence similarity with those of the animal RFX TF family (2). Lubelsky et al. reported the functional conservation of RFX from S. cerevisiae to humans in response to DNA damage (7). In addition to the DNA damage response, RFX TFs are central regulators in a transcriptional network regulating ciliary gene expression in sensory neurons (8, 9). Loss of RFX function causes the absence of cilia, resulting in severe sensory defects in Caenorhabditis elegans (10). Piasecki et al. suggested that RFX TFs originated early in the unikont lineage (fungi, Amoebozoa, choanoflagellates, and animals) (11). Transcriptional rewiring of many ciliary genes by RFX TFs occurred early in the animal lineage (11, 12). Thus, RFX TFs co-opted control over ciliary gene expression in animals, although their DNA-binding domains were conserved (11).
Functional studies of RFX TFs have been performed in several fungal species. For example, RFX1 in Penicillium chrysogenum (PcRFX1) was found to bind to the promoter region of penicillin biosynthetic genes, and knockdown of Pcrfx1 reduced penicillin production (13). The cpcR1 gene of Acremonium chrysogenum was initially found to bind promoters of cephalosporin C biosynthesis genes. However, disruption of cpcR1 did not reduce cephalosporin C production (14, 15). Subsequently, it was revealed that cpcR1 is required for hyphal fragmentation and, thus, for arthrospore formation (16). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, sak1+ was found to be indispensable for cell viability. Thus, loss of sak1 caused multiple defects in mitosis and cell morphology (17).
In Penicillium marneffei, rfxA was found to be essential for cellular division and morphogenesis, particularly during conidiation and yeast growth (18). In contrast to its action in S. cerevisiae, the knockdown mutant of rfxA was more sensitive to a DNA damage agent in P. marneffei. In Candida albicans, rfx2 repressed genes related to the repair of DNA damage and regulated hyphal morphogenesis and virulence (5). An rfx2-null mutant was shown to be significantly more resistant to UV irradiation than the wild-type strain. In many fungi, RFX TFs have been shown to be required for normal cell division and morphogenesis; however, in S. cerevisiae, Scrfx1 is dispensable for normal cell growth. Moreover, disruption of RFX TFs causes opposite responses to DNA damage in different fungal species. These findings imply that the functions of RFX TFs are not conserved, despite the presence of a highly conserved DNA-binding domain.
Fusarium graminearum is a major cereal pathogen, causing Fusarium head blight in wheat, barley, and rice, as well as ear rot and stalk rot in maize. In addition to yield reduction, the fungus contaminates grains with mycotoxins that cause feed refusal and other toxicoses in livestock and pose a threat to food safety (19). F. graminearum forms mature perithecia on crop residues and forcibly discharges ascospores, which are the primary inocula (20–23). Conidia produced from sporodochia on infected crops are easily disseminated by rain splash, acting as the secondary inocula (24). Thus, sexual and asexual reproduction of F. graminearum are important developmental processes for Fusarium head blight (21) and require the elaborate regulation of many genes (25, 26).
Our research goal was to investigate the role of the RFX TF in F. graminearum (FgRFX). Therefore, the objectives of this study were (i) to identify the RFX TF in F. graminearum, (ii) to characterize its role in morphogenesis and the DNA damage response, and (iii) to identify RFX TF-regulated genes by analyzing the transcriptome. The results of this study suggest that the transcriptional suppressor rfx1 is required for maintenance of genome integrity and normal cell growth in F. graminearum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and culture conditions.
The F. graminearum strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Standard laboratory methods and culture media for the Fusarium species were used (27). Cultures were maintained in complete medium (CM) agar plates. Conidia were produced in carboxymethyl cellulose medium (CMC) or on yeast malt agar (YMA) (28, 29). Unless otherwise stated, the growing temperature of the fungal strains was set at 25°C. All strains were stored as conidia and mycelia in 30% glycerol solution at −80°C.
TABLE 1.
F. graminearum strains used in this study
| Strain | Genotype | Reference, source, or parent strains |
|---|---|---|
| Z-3639 | Wild-type | 58 |
| Δrfx1 strain | Δrfx1::gen | 37 |
| KH23 | Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp-hyg | This study |
| hH1-GFP strain | hH1-gfp-hyg | 59 |
| Δmat1 strain | Δmat1-1::gen | 60 |
| mat1g | Δmat1-1::gen hH1-gfp-hyg | 59 |
| KH24 | Δrfx1::gen hH1-gfp-hyg | mat1g × Δrfx1 strain |
| mat1r | Δmat1-1::gen hH1-rfp-hyg | 61 |
| KH25 | Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp-hyg hH1-rfp-hyg | mat1r × KH23 |
| KH26 | Δrfx1::gfp-hyg | This study |
| KH27 | Δrfx1::gfp-hyg hH1-rfp-hyg | mat1r × KH26 |
| HK12 | GFP-hyg | 62 |
Conidia were harvested from CMC and transferred to CM containing various DNA-damaging agents at the following concentrations: hydroxyurea (10 mM), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (0.1%), and bleomycin (20 mU/ml). Conidia were inoculated on CM agar plates and immediately exposed to UV (254 nm, 480 J/m2). The germination rates of the conidia were examined by microscopy 18 h after inoculation, and the percentage of germinated conidia was determined. All statistical analyses were conducted using the R statistical software package (30).
Nucleic manipulation, primers, and PCR conditions.
Genomic DNA was isolated from lyophilized mycelia as previously described (27). Restriction endonuclease digestion, Southern blotting, and hybridization with 32P-labeled probes were performed in accordance with standard techniques (31). The PCR primers used in this study were synthesized by an oligonucleotide synthesis facility (Bionics, Seoul, South Korea) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). General PCR procedures were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (TaKaRa Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan).
Sexual crosses.
For self-fertilization, cultures were grown on carrot agar plates for 5 days. Sexual reproduction was induced by removing aerial mycelia with sterile 2.5% Tween 60 solution (27). For outcrosses, female strains grown on carrot agar plates were fertilized with conidial suspensions from corresponding male strains 5 days after inoculation. The cultures were incubated under a near-UV lamp (365 nm) at 25°C for an additional 7 days.
Fungal transformation.
For green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagging and complementation, a DNA fragment containing the native promoter and the open-reading frame (ORF) of rfx1 was amplified with RFX1/5F and RFX1_ORF/Rev. The double-joint PCR method (32) was used to fuse the amplicon to the 3′-flanking region of rfx1 and a GFP cassette containing the hygromycin B resistance gene (hyg). Fusion constructs were amplified with nested primers to generate split markers. The resulting constructs were introduced into Δrfx1 protoplasts, using the polyethylene glycol-mediated fungal transformation procedure (33). Transformants were selected under hygromycin B (75 μg/ml).
The ORF of rfx1 was replaced with the GFP cassette to generate strain KH26 (Δrfx1::gfp-hyg). The GFP cassette, 5′-flanking region of rfx1, and 3′-flanking region of rfx1 were fused. The fusion constructs were amplified with nested primers to generate split markers. The resulting constructs were introduced into wild-type protoplasts. rfx1 deletion mutants were selected under hygromycin B (75 μg/ml) and screened for GFP fluorescence in mycelia.
Fluorescence microscopy.
Differential interference contrast and fluorescence images were captured on an Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera. Nuclei of conidia were stained with acriflavin and examined with the 470-nm/525-nm (excitation/emission wavelength) filter set (34). The organelle localizations of fusion proteins RFX1-GFP and histone H1 (hH1)-GFP were imaged with the 470-nm/525-nm filter set. Red fluorescence protein (RFP)-tagged histone H1 was examined with the 550-nm/605-nm filter set. The cell wall was stained with 0.2 μl/ml calcofluor white (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and observed using the 550-nm/605-nm filter set. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and examined with the 365-nm/445-nm filter set (35). Images were analyzed using the AxioVision release 4.7 software package (Carl Zeiss).
Virulence assays.
The virulence of fungal strains on wheat heads was assessed in the wheat cultivar Eunpamil as previously described (36, 37). Conidia were harvested from CMC cultures and resuspended to 106 spores/ml in 0.01% Tween 20 solution. The center spikelet was drop inoculated midanthesis with 10 μl of conidial suspension. Inoculated plants were incubated in a humidity chamber at 25°C for 3 days and grown in a greenhouse for an additional 18 days. Infected wheat heads were imaged, and the spikelets with head blight symptoms were counted.
Toxin analysis.
The conidial suspension was inoculated in defined medium containing 5 mM agmatine (MMA) and incubated for 7 days as previously described (38). Culture filtrates were extracted with an ethyl acetate-methanol mixture (4:1, vol/vol). The extracts were dried (39), and the residues were derivatized with trimethylsilylating reagent [N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (BSA), trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), and 1-(trimethylsilyl)imidazole (TMSI), 3:2:3; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA]. The resulting samples were analyzed with a Shimadzu QP-5000 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) as previously described (40).
Neutral comet assay.
Fungal conidia produced in CMC culture were inoculated into 50 ml of YPG liquid medium (3 g yeast extract, 10 g peptone, and 20 g glucose per liter) at 106 spores/ml and grown for 12 h with shaking (33). Mycelia were harvested by filtration and incubated in 35 ml of 1 M NH4Cl containing Driselase (10 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich) at 30°C to generate protoplasts. For bleomycin treatment of wild-type cells, protoplasts were generated in Driselase solution containing 20 mU/ml bleomycin. Protoplasts were collected by centrifugation 4 h after incubation and resuspended in 1 M NH4Cl.
Low-gelling-temperature agarose (1%; Sigma-Aldrich) was molten in 1 M NH4Cl and kept at 40°C. The protoplast suspension was mixed with molten agarose at 6 × 103 cells/ml. The agarose was poured onto frosted slides and allowed to gel. Slides were submerged in neutral lysis solution for double-strand break (DSB) detection, in accordance with a standard protocol (41). After overnight lysis, the slides were washed three times in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer for 30 min each. Electrophoresis was conducted in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer for 25 min at 0.6 V/cm. The slides were rinsed with deionized water, stained in ethidium bromide solution, rinsed again with deionized water, and dried at room temperature. Dried agarose gels were rehydrated before fluorescence microscopy.
Comet images were captured on an Axio Imager A1 microscope with a CCD camera and the 550-nm/605-nm filter set. Comet images were composed of the comet head and comet tail. The percentage of DNA in the tail was analyzed for individual comet images by using CometScore image analysis software (TriTek Corp., Sumerduck, VA).
Quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR.
Wild-type and Δrfx1 conidia produced in CMC culture were inoculated into 50 ml of CM. The wild-type culture was incubated for 24 h and the Δrfx1 culture for 32 h with shaking. Mycelia were harvested and subcultured in fresh CM or CM containing 20 mU/ml bleomycin. The cultures were incubated for an additional 2 h. Total RNA was isolated from mycelia that were ground in liquid nitrogen using an Easy-Spin total RNA extraction kit (Intron Biotech, Seongnam, South Korea). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen).
qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). An endogenous housekeeping gene, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (ubh; FGSG_01231.3), was used as a reference gene (42). The transcript levels of target genes under different conditions were compared by the cycle threshold (2−ΔΔCT) method (43). The qRT-PCR analysis was repeated three times with two biological replications.
RNA-sequencing analysis.
Wild-type and Δrfx1 conidia were harvested from CMC culture and inoculated into CM. The wild-type culture was incubated for 24 h, and the Δrfx1 culture was incubated for 32 h with shaking. Total RNA was extracted as stated above from mycelia that were ground in liquid nitrogen. RNA-sequencing libraries were constructed using the Illumina TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit in accordance with the standard low-throughput protocol. Samples were run on an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument using the reagents provided in the Illumina TruSeq paired-end (PE) cluster kit V3-cBot-HS and the TruSeq SBS kit v3-HS (200 cycles).
Genome-wide transcript levels of genes were quantified in reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped sequence reads (RPKM) (44). When the RPKM value was 0, it was changed to 1 to calculate the fold change of the transcript level. Genes for which differential transcript levels were detected were functionally characterized using the Munich Information Centre for Protein Sequences FunCat functional classification and annotation system (45). Over- and underrepresentation analysis of FunCat categories was performed by using Pearson's χ2 test.
Microarray data accession number.
RNA sequencing data were deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE52198.
RESULTS
Molecular characterization of the rfx1 gene.
The Fusarium Comparative Database (Fusarium Comparative Sequencing Project, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, http://www.broadinstitute.org) annotated the rfx1 gene (locus FGSG_07420) based on the presence of an RFX DNA-binding domain. We aligned protein sequences from RFX1 homologs using ClustalW in the MEGA 5.2 program and BoxShade. The alignment showed that the RFX DNA-binding domain of FgRFX1 is highly conserved among all characterized RFX proteins (Fig. 1A). Phylogenetic analyses of RFX homologues were performed using a neighbor-joining algorithm, with bootstrap values calculated from 100 iterations. The phylogenetic tree revealed that RFX homologs of filamentous fungi clustered into a separate group relative to those of yeasts and animals (Fig. 1B).
FIG 1.

F. graminearum RFX1 contains protein motifs characteristic of the RFX protein. (A) Alignment of regions containing the RFX DNA-binding domain from all characterized RFX proteins. (B) Phylogenetic tree of all characterized RFX proteins and fungal putative RFX proteins. Hs, Homo sapiens; Mm, Mus musculus; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sp, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Ac, Acremonium chrysogenum; Pm, Penicillium marneffei; Fg, F. graminearum; Fo, Fusarium oxysporum; Fv, Fusarium verticillioides; Nc, Neurospora crassa; Mo, Magnaporthe oryzae; Cac, Cephalosporium acremonium; An, Aspergillus nidulans; Ca, Candida albicans.
Effects of rfx1 deletion on nucleus and septum formation.
The rfx1 deletion strain was provided by a mutant library of TFs in F. graminearum (37). For genetic complementation and GFP tagging of rfx1, a construct containing the rfx1 ORF fused with the GFP cassette was introduced into the rfx1 deletion mutant. The Southern hybridization results showed that the construct replaced gen in the genome of the complementation strain, resulting in strain KH23 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The Δrfx1 strain showed severely reduced radial growth on CM agar plates and did not produce aerial mycelia (Fig. 2 and Table 2).
FIG 2.

Mycelial growth of fungal strains on complete medium plates. Photographs were taken 4 days after inoculation. WT, wild type.
TABLE 2.
Vegetative growth, virulence, and trichothecene production in F. graminearum strainsa
| Strain type | Radial growth (mm)b | Conidium formation (105/ml)c | Virulence (disease index)d | Trichothecene production (mg/g)e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | 39 ± 2.9 b | 19 ± 4.7 b | 4 ± 2 b | 25 ± 2.1 a |
| Δrfx1 | 21 ± 1.2 a | 2.4 ± 0.59 a | 0 ± 0 a | 20 ± 2.5 a |
| Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp | 38 ± 2.2 b | 17 ± 5.5 b | 3 ± 2 b | 21 ± 2.7 a |
The data presented are average values ± standard deviations. Values within a column with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Tukey's HSD test.
Radial growth was measured 4 days after inoculation into CM agar plates.
Conidia were counted 5 days after inoculation into CMC.
Disease index (number of diseased spikelets per wheat head) of the strains was measured 21 days after inoculation.
Total trichothecenes (deoxynivalenol and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol) were analyzed with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. Trichothecene production was quantified on the basis of the biomass (g) of each sample.
Strain KH24 (Δrfx1::gen hH1-gfp-hyg) was generated by crossing strain mat1g (Δmat1-1::gen hH1-gfp-hyg) and the Δrfx1 strain (Table 1). KH24 showed the same phenotypes as the parental Δrfx1 strain and exhibited green fluorescence in nuclei. Strain KH25 (Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp-hyg hH1-rfp-hyg) was generated by crossing strain mat1r (Δmat1-1::gen hH1-rfp-hyg) and the complementation strain (Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp-hyg). KH25 had both green and red fluorescence in its nuclei. Conidia of the histone H1 (hH1)-GFP strain, KH24, and KH25 were produced in CMC and inoculated into CM to examine the nucleus and septum formation in hyphae. Mycelia were harvested 12 h after inoculation (except for mycelia of KH24, which were harvested 24 h after inoculation). Septa and nuclei of hyphae were observed by calcofluor white staining and fluorescent histone H1 proteins, respectively. The formation of septa in Δrfx1 hyphae was severely inhibited compared to their formation in the wild type (Fig. 3). The Δrfx1 hyphae were largely aseptate, whereas wild-type hyphae possessed numerous septa. The Δrfx1 nuclei were irregular in size, and the Δrfx1 strain produced small fragmented nuclei, called micronuclei.
FIG 3.

Nucleus and septum formation in hyphae. Histone H1 was tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP) to visualize nuclei. Cell wall was stained with calcofluor white. Arrowheads indicate septa, and arrows indicate micronuclei. Both deletion of rfx1 and bleomycin treatment inhibited septum formation and produced micronuclei in hyphae. WT, wild type; WT+BLM, wild-type hyphae grown with 20 mU/ml bleomycin; DIC, differential interference contrast; Nuclei & Septa, overlays of calcofluor white staining and fluorescent protein images. Scale bar = 20 μm.
The level of conidium production of the Δrfx1 strain was 9 times lower than that of the wild type (Table 2). In addition, the Δrfx1 conidia were abnormally shaped (Fig. 4). The average conidium length in the Δrfx1 strain (71 μm) was much longer than that in the wild type (45 μm) (P < 0.01). Deletion of rfx1 resulted in more severe defects in the nucleus and septum formation of conidia than of hyphae. Most wild-type conidia (∼70%) had four or five cells with one nucleus per cell; in contrast, most Δrfx1 conidia (∼70%) had one or two cells with multiple nuclei. In the Δrfx1 conidia, the nuclei were irregularly shaped and many were micronuclei. The hyphal growth and conidial morphology of KH23 were restored to the wild-type phenotypes.
FIG 4.

Morphology of Δrfx1 conidia changed dramatically. Nuclei in the Δrfx1 conidia were fragmented and scattered. WT, wild type; DIC, differential interference contrast; Nuclei, acriflavin staining was used to visualize nuclei. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Virulence and toxin production.
The virulence of the fungal strains was examined by point inoculation of wheat spikelets. The Δrfx1 strain was unable to infect the inoculated spikelets, whereas the wild-type and complemented strains readily colonized the inoculated spikelets and spread to the neighboring spikelets. The disease index (number of diseased spikelets per wheat head) of the Δrfx1 strain was zero (Table 2). We also examined the production of trichothecene, which is an important virulence factor. Trichothecene biosynthesis was induced in MMA, which contains agmatine as a nitrogen source. GC-MS detected two trichothecenes, deoxynivalenol and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol. The production of total trichothecenes was not markedly different (P > 0.05) among the strains on the basis of the biomass (g) of each sample.
Sexual development.
The Δrfx1 strain produced few immature perithecia, whereas the wild-type and the complementation (Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp) strains produced abundant mature perithecia 7 days after sexual induction (Fig. 5). The perithecia did not contain any ascus structures. The heterothallic F. graminearum strain carrying the MAT1-1 deletion with histone H1-GFP (mat1g) was crossed with the Δrfx1 mutants to investigate the male fertility of the Δrfx1 strain. We randomly isolated 144 ascospores, but 57 ascospores did not germinate. The genotypes of the germinated 87 ascospores were analyzed. The segregation ratio of the genotypes was 39:27:8:13 (rfx1 hH1-gfp/rfx1 hH1/Δrfx1 hH1-gfp/Δrfx1 hH1), indicating that most ascospores carrying the rfx1 deletion were not viable. Progenies carrying the rfx1 deletion were many fewer than those carrying wild-type rfx1 (21:66). However, the ratio of hH1-GFP to non-GFP segregation was 1:1, indicating that the outcross underwent normal sexual recombination.
FIG 5.

Sexual development of F. graminearum strains. Shown are perithecia formed on carrot agar 7 days after sexual induction. WT, wild type.
We further investigated role of rfx1 in sexual development, replacing the rfx1 gene with the cytoplasmic GFP gene and thus generating a Δrfx1::gfp-hyg strain (KH26). KH27 was generated by crossing mat1r and KH26 (Table 1). A heterothallic F. graminearum strain carrying the MAT1-1 deletion with histone H1-RFP (mat1r) was crossed with KH27 to examine the fertility of the Δrfx1 strain as a male (Fig. 6). When mature asci were dissected, four out of eight ascospores expressed GFP, indicating that they were rfx1 deletion mutants. In F. graminearum, ascospores underwent two mitoses, producing four cells with one nucleus after spore delimitation. Ascospores with the rfx1 deletion were composed of one cell with one or two nuclei, whereas the non-GFP ascospores were composed of four cells with one nucleus. Thus, deletion of rfx1 blocked mitosis in ascospores after spore delimitation. Defects of spore maturation may cause inviability of ascospores carrying the deletion of rfx1.
FIG 6.

Outcrosses between mat1r (Δmat1-1::gen hH1-rfp-hyg) female and KH27 (Δrfx1::gfp-hyg hH1-rfp-hyg) male. In both female and male, histone H1 was fused with RFP to visualize nuclei. Ascospores with an rfx1 deletion (GFP positive) were composed of one cell with one or two nuclei, indicating immaturity. (A) Differential interference contrast image. (B) RFP fluorescence image visualizing nuclei. (C) GFP fluorescence image. (D) RFP image merged with GFP image. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Localization of GFP-tagged RFX1 proteins.
To determine the subcellular distribution of RFX1, we complemented the Δrfx1 strain by introducing the RFX1-GFP-hyg construct, which was GFP tagged at the C terminus of RFX1. The resulting Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp strain (KH23) exhibited wild-type phenotypes under all conditions, as previously described. Conidia of KH23 were inoculated into CM and examined after 12 h of incubation. Conidiation of KH23 was induced in CMC and examined 3 days after induction. Although KH23 does not contain any predictable nuclear localization signals, RFX1-GFP localized to the nuclei. Intense fluorescence was found in nuclei of growing hyphae and developing conidiophores (Fig. 7). However, the fluorescence was too weak to detect in mature hyphae and conidia.
FIG 7.

Localization of GFP-tagged RFX1. RFX1-GFP localized into nuclei and exhibited high expression levels in growing hyphae (top) and conidiophores (bottom). DIC, differential interference contrast; DAPI, DAPI staining was used to visualize nuclei; GFP, fluorescence of RFX1-GFP. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Sensitivity of rfx1 deletion strain to DNA damage.
To investigate the function of rfx1 in the DNA damage response, we examined the germination rate of conidia under conditions of DNA damage (Fig. 8). Conidia of the fungal strains were exposed to UV and several DNA-damaging agents, including hydroxyurea, MMS, and bleomycin. The conditions induced low-level DNA damage, such that the wild-type and Δrfx1::rfx1-gfp conidia germinated well. However, the germination rate of Δrfx1 conidia was markedly reduced under all DNA damage conditions, indicating that deletion of rfx1 resulted in sensitivity to DNA damage, regardless of the type of damage.
FIG 8.
Germination rates of conidia under DNA-damaging conditions. (A) Conidia were spread on complete medium agar plates and exposed to UV (254 nm, 480 J/m2). Germination rates of the conidia were examined under a microscope 18 h after exposure. (B) Conidia were inoculated into complete medium containing various DNA-damaging agents (HU, hydroxyurea; MMS, methyl methanesulfonate; BLM, bleomycin). Germination rates of the conidia were determined 18 h after inoculation. Double asterisks show statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) from wild-type strain based on independent Student's t test. WT, wild type; Control, negative control without DNA damage.
Interestingly, we found that bleomycin (10 mU/ml), which induced low levels of DNA damage, inhibited septum formation in the wild-type hyphae. Septum formation was severely delayed and micronuclei were found when a higher concentration (20 mU/ml) of bleomycin was used (Fig. 3). Bleomycin is known to induce DNA DSBs (46, 47). Both bleomycin and deletion of rfx1 triggered aseptation and micronuclei in hyphae, implying that deletion of rfx1 might induce spontaneous DNA strand breaks.
Accumulation of spontaneous DNA DSBs.
A neutral comet assay was performed to measure the amount of DNA DSBs in fungal cells. The comet assay combines DNA gel electrophoresis with fluorescence microscopy to visualize the migration of DNA from individual agarose-embedded cells (41). In the neutral comet assay, the comet head contains undamaged DNA, and the comet tail contains DSB-generated fragments. Therefore, cells with more DSBs show a higher percentage of DNA in the tail. Because bleomycin produces DNA DSBs (46, 47), we treated wild-type cells with 20 mU/ml bleomycin as a positive control.
The bleomycin-treated cells contained a higher percentage of DNA in the tail than the untreated cells, indicating that the neutral comet assay detected DNA DSBs (Fig. 9). The percentage of DNA in the tail was increased in Δrfx1 cells compared to the result for wild-type cells (P < 0.01). The occurrence of DSBs in Δrfx1 cells was similar to that in bleomycin-treated cells. The results suggested that deletion of rfx1 triggered DNA DSBs in the absence of a DNA-damaging agent.
FIG 9.
Detection of increased double-strand breaks in Δrfx1 cells and bleomycin-treated cells. (A) Photographs of comets and image analysis for neutral comet assay. DNA fragments generated from double-strand breaks migrated toward the anode, creating the comet tail. Comets of the Δrfx1 and bleomycin-treated cells produced longer tails. Graphs show image analysis quantifying DNA contents of head and tail. (B) Average percentages of DNA in comet tails. The Δrfx1 and bleomycin-treated cells exhibited significantly higher percentages of DNA in comet tails than the wild type (P < 0.01).
Effects of rfx1 deletion on genome-wide transcription profiles.
We obtained and analyzed genome-wide transcription profiles generated from the RNA sequencing data of the wild-type and Δrfx1 strains. The RPKM values of 13,820 recently reannotated genes in F. graminearum (48) were obtained and compared (see Dataset S1 in the supplemental material). Genes with transcript levels showing a 3-fold or greater difference between the Δrfx1 and wild-type strains were functionally characterized (45), as shown in Table 3. The results revealed that 38% of all genes were upregulated in the Δrfx1 strain, whereas only 1% were downregulated. These findings implied a role for RFX1 as a transcriptional repressor. There was a significant enrichment of genes in the “Unclassified protein” category, which showed a 3-fold increase in transcript abundance compared to the transcription of the genome as a whole (P < 0.001). However, most of the FunCat categories showed significant underrepresentation of 3-fold-upregulated genes (P < 0.001), except for FunCat categories 32 and 41. The transcript levels of 35 genes involved in DNA repair (FunCat 10.01.05.01) were increased in the deletion mutants. This implied that deletion of rfx1 triggered derepression of many genes whose functions have not been annotated.
TABLE 3.
Functional categories of genes showing changes in transcript levels in Δrfx1 strain compared to the wild type
| FunCat ID | FunCat category | No. of genes: |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In genome | Upregulated >3-fold | Downregulated >3-fold | ||
| 01 | Metabolism | 2,332 | 801 | 24 |
| 02 | Energy | 503 | 139 | 6 |
| 10 | Cell cycle and DNA procession | 659 | 85 | 1 |
| 10.01.05.01 | DNA repair | 156 | 35 | 0 |
| 11 | Transcription | 718 | 26 | 9 |
| 12 | Protein synthesis | 370 | 6 | 1 |
| 14 | Protein fate | 920 | 106 | 4 |
| 16 | Protein with binding function or cofactor requirement | 1,714 | 324 | 10 |
| 18 | Regulation of metabolism and protein function | 242 | 14 | 0 |
| 20 | Cellular transport, transport facilities, and transport routes | 1,390 | 411 | 12 |
| 30 | Cellular communication/signal transduction mechanism | 312 | 33 | 1 |
| 32 | Cell rescue, defense, and virulence | 856 | 312 | 8 |
| 34 | Interaction with the environment | 606 | 176 | 7 |
| 40 | Cell fate | 240 | 15 | 0 |
| 41 | Development | 55 | 18 | 0 |
| 42 | Biogenesis of cellular components | 617 | 91 | 5 |
| 43 | Cell type differentiation | 273 | 33 | 1 |
| 99 | Unclassified proteins | 9,004 | 4,076 | 105 |
| Total | 13,820 | 5,300 | 146 | |
There are two complementary mechanisms for DNA DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We selected several proteins required for HR and NHEJ (49), including RAD51, RAD52, and RAD54, which are required for HR, KU70, KU80, and DNA ligase IV, which are required for NHEJ, and RAD50, which is required for both HR and NHEJ. Because Δrfx1 cells had spontaneous DNA DSBs, the expression of DSB repair genes was examined in detail (Table 4). The Δrfx1 cells showed greater expression of DSB repair genes than the wild-type cells in RNA-sequencing analysis.
TABLE 4.
Transcript levels of selected genes involved in DNA double-strand break repair
| Locus | Putative ortholog of protein in humansa | Fold change of transcript level in RNA-seqb | Relative transcript level of indicated strain grown with or without BLMc |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT |
Δrfx1 strain |
|||||
| − BLM | + BLM | − BLM | + BLM | |||
| FGSG_07420 (rfx1) | RFX1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FGSG_12711 | KU70 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 15.1 |
| FGSG_06721 | KU80 | 8.9 | 1.0 | 7.9 | 6.0 | 24.1 |
| FGSG_04154 | DNA ligase IV | 6.3 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 8.0 |
| FGSG_11814 | RAD50 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 4.2 |
| FGSG_01157 | RAD51 | 21 | 1.0 | 4.6 | 7.2 | 17.0 |
| FGSG_10158 | RAD52 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.6 |
| FGSG_07962 | RAD54 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 5.9 |
| FGSG_05174 | RRM1 (RNR1) | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| FGSG_05409 | RRM2 (RNR2) | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
The Fusarium Comparative Database was searched for homologs of human double-strand break (DSB) repair genes using BLAST analysis.
Fold changes of RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped sequence reads) values in the Δrfx1 strain compared to the value in the wild type.
Wild-type and Δrfx1 mycelia were grown in complete medium (CM) and subcultured in fresh CM or CM containing 20 mU/ml of bleomycin (BLM). Cultures were incubated for an additional 2 h, and the total RNA was isolated. Transcript levels of target genes were analyzed by quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR. The endogenous housekeeping gene ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (ubh; FGSG_01231.3) was used as the reference gene. Data are expressed as arbitrary units, where the transcript level of the wild-type strain not treated with bleomycin was set to 1.
The transcriptome analyses were validated for the selected genes using qRT-PCR (Table 4). Consistent with the RNA sequencing data, the DSB repair genes were upregulated in the Δrfx1 cells in the qRT-PCR analysis. In response to bleomycin, the expression of DSB repair genes was increased in the wild-type and Δrfx1 cells. The Δrfx1 cells with bleomycin exhibited the highest expression of the genes, indicating an additive effect. These findings indicate that both bleomycin and deletion of rfx1 produced DSBs in DNA and induced the expression of DSB repair genes.
DISCUSSION
RFXs are conserved TFs in fungi and animals, but their functions appear to have diversified during evolution (11). Several studies have reported that RFX TFs in fungi are required for DNA damage responses, cell division, and differentiation (2, 5, 16–18). The objective of this study was to investigate rfx1 in F. graminearum and to characterize its role in cell morphogenesis and the DNA damage response. We examined deletion mutants of rfx1 and found that the loss of rfx1 triggered multiple defects in the fungal life cycle.
The Δrfx1 strain lost its pathogenicity in wheat heads (Table 2). As virulence factors of F. graminearum in wheat infection, trichothecenes inhibit host defenses (50, 51). Deletion of Fgrfx1 did not change the production of secondary metabolites, such as pigments and trichothecenes, in F. graminearum (Fig. 2 and Table 2). In contrast, knockdown of Pcrfx1 was shown to reduce penicillin biosynthesis in P. chrysogenum (13). Thus, the loss of pathogenicity in this study could not be attributed to trichothecene production. It has been reported that hyphae of F. graminearum develop mats and appressoria-like structures to penetrate the host cell wall (51). We assume that the Δrfx1 strain cannot infect the host cells due to the severe defects in infection-related morphogenesis. The Δrfx1 strain was not able to undergo normal morphogenesis in conidiation and sexual development. We hypothesized that deletion of rfx1 prevented hyphae from developing infection structures required for host infection. Similarly, the knockdown of rfxA resulted in an inability of P. marneffei hyphae to transition to infectious yeast cells (18).
Given the role of RFX TFs in response to DNA damage in S. cerevisiae (2), it is interesting to speculate whether Fgrfx1 is involved in a similar mechanism in F. graminearum, particularly in light of the increased sensitivity of the Δrfx1 strain to DNA damage. UV leads to aberrant covalent bonding between adjacent pyrimidine bases, producing dimers. Hydroxyurea stalls DNA replication because it is an inhibitor of RNRs and thereby depletes dNTP pools (52). The DNA-alkylating agent MMS methylates guanine and adenine to cause base mispairing and replication blocks, respectively (53). Bleomycin binds DNA and produces reactive oxygen species that induce DNA DSBs (46, 47). Disruption of Scrfx1 increased resistance to UV and MMS in S. cerevisiae (5, 6). In C. albicans, the rfx2 deletion mutant was significantly resistant to UV irradiation (5). In this study, deletion of Fgrfx1 reduced viability following all of these types of DNA damage in F. graminearum (Fig. 8). Similarly, knockdown mutants of rfxA have been shown to be sensitive to hydroxyurea in P. marneffei (18). Phylogenetic analysis showed that Scrfx1 and rfx2 were grouped in the same clade (Fig. 1B). S. cerevisiae and C. albicans belong to the subphylum Saccharomycotina, while F. graminearum and P. marneffei are members of the subphylum Pezizomycotina. We suggest that RFX TFs have opposite functions in the DNA damage responses of Saccharomycotina and Pezizomycotina. These differences may also reflect specific aspects of the multinucleate and multicellular growth habit that is characteristic of filamentous hyphae in the Pezizomycotina.
We used the neutral comet assay to demonstrate that Δrfx1 cells accumulated DNA DSBs (Fig. 9). RNA-sequencing and qRT-PCR analyses indicated that genes involved in DNA DSB repair were upregulated in the Δrfx1 and bleomycin-treated wild-type strains (Table 4). Bleomycin-treated Δrfx1 cells exhibited the highest transcript levels of DNA repair genes, suggesting a synergistic effect. We suggest that spontaneous DSBs resulted in sensitivity of the Δrfx1 strain to DNA damage. The mutant cells presumably failed to tolerate additional DNA damage because the integrity of their genomes had already been severely compromised by the loss of RFX1. Although DSB repair genes were upregulated in the Δrfx1 cells, we suspect that this was insufficient to cope with the DNA damage caused by agents such as bleomycin. Increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents despite the induction of repair activities has also been observed in the Aspergillus nidulans sepB mutant (54).
Deletion of rfx1 inhibited septum formation and produced micronuclei in hyphae and conidia (Fig. 3 and 4). In sexual development, ascospores carrying the rfx1 deletion did not undergo nuclear division or septation after spore delimitation (Fig. 6). Bleomycin treatment also delayed septum formation and produced micronuclei in F. graminearum. Therefore, deletion of rfx1 likely caused DNA DSBs, which prevented septum formation and produced micronuclei. Micronuclei are biomarkers of chromosomal instability because they result from chromosome missegregation caused by the inability to repair DNA DSBs (55). For example, treatment of Neurospora crassa with an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I, campothecin, induced micronuclei formation (56). In the present study, a low concentration of bleomycin inhibited septation but did not inhibit nuclear division. These observations are consistent with the ability of sublethal doses of hydroxyurea to prevent septum formation in A. nidulans (57). However, hydroxyurea and campothecin did not delay septum formation or produce micronuclei in F. graminearum (data not shown). These results emphasize the importance of genome integrity in normal cell growth, even if the response to DNA-damaging agents varies between species. In particular, Harris and Kraus suggested that the compartmentalization of hyphae by septa might be exquisitely sensitive to the presence of nuclei that have incurred sublethal DNA damage (57). Because compartmentalized nuclei likely represent a source of nuclei that will populate new branches or developmental structures, this response presumably exists to maximize the likelihood that these nuclei are fully intact.
It is apparent that deletion of rfx1 causes spontaneous DNA DSBs; however, the underlying biochemical mechanism remains to be elucidated. In S. cerevisiae, disruption of Scrfx1 did not induce DNA DSBs but, rather, resistance to DNA damage because of the derepression of RNRs (5, 6). The transcript levels of the RNR2 homolog were doubled in the F. graminearum Δrfx1 strain compared to the levels in the wild-type, whereas the levels of the RNR1 homolog remained stable (Table 4). However, the observed derepression of RNR2 did not appear to confer resistance to DNA damage. RFX1-GFP localized in nuclei and exhibited high expression levels in growing hyphae and conidiophores, where nuclear division was actively occurring (Fig. 7). We propose that RFX1 functions as a transcriptional repressor that suppresses many genes involved in DNA damage repair and the cell cycle during normal nuclear division. In accordance with this view, RNA-Seq analysis showed that deletion of rfx1 triggered the upregulation of many genes, including those involved in DNA damage repair (Table 3; see also Dataset S1 in the supplemental material). The uncontrolled expression of genes in actively growing cells would presumably disrupt DNA replication and chromosome division, generating DNA DSBs.
In conclusion, the rfx1 gene is important for genome integrity in F. graminearum. Disruption of the rfx1 function resulted in DNA DSBs that, in turn, produced micronuclei and prevented septum formation. Abnormal cell growth caused multiple defects in hyphal growth, conidiation, virulence, sexual development, and the DNA damage response. These results were different from the yeast model proposed in previous studies (2, 6, 7). In the transcriptional rewiring theory, DNA-binding domains of TFs rarely differ substantially across species, but the target genes regulated by TFs can differ considerably (12). Through transcriptional rewiring, ciliary gene promoters were found to acquire RFX TF regulation early in the animal lineage (11). We propose that RFX1 co-opted control of genes involved in genome integrity by a similar process in F. graminearum. However, the target genes directly regulated by RFX1 have not been identified. Transcriptomic analysis of the Δrfx1 strain indicated that rfx1 directly or indirectly suppressed more than 5,000 genes. Future work, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing, will explore downstream genes that RFX1 binds directly. These studies will help to uncover the function of RFX1 and the evolution of its transcriptional network in fungi.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (grant no. 2008-0061897), funded by the government of the Republic of Korea (MSIP).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 24 January 2014
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00293-13.
REFERENCES
- 1.Zhou B-BS, Elledge SJ. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433–439. 10.1038/35044005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. 1998. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the CRT1 repressor. Cell 94:595–605. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81601-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chabes A, Georgieva B, Domkin V, Zhao X, Rothstein R, Thelander L. 2003. Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell 112:391–401. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00075-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tanaka H, Arakawa H, Yamaguchi T, Shiraishi K, Fukuda S, Matsui K, Takei Y, Nakamura Y. 2000. A ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage. Nature 404:42–49. 10.1038/35003506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hao B, Clancy CJ, Cheng S, Raman SB, Iczkowski KA, Nguyen MH. 2009. Candida albicans RFX2 encodes a DNA binding protein involved in DNA damage responses, morphogenesis, and virulence. Eukaryot. Cell 8:627–639. 10.1128/EC.00246-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen C, Lancaster CS, Shi B, Guo H, Thimmaiah P, Bjornsti M-A. 2007. TOR signaling is a determinant of cell survival in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:7007–7017. 10.1128/MCB.00290-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lubelsky Y, Reuven N, Shaul Y. 2005. Autorepression of Rfx1 gene expression: functional conservation from yeast to humans in response to DNA replication arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10665–10673. 10.1128/MCB.25.23.10665-10673.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El Zein L, Ait-Lounis A, Morlé L, Thomas J, Chhin B, Spassky N, Reith W, Durand B. 2009. RFX3 governs growth and beating efficiency of motile cilia in mouse and controls the expression of genes involved in human ciliopathies. J. Cell Sci. 122:3180–3189. 10.1242/jcs.048348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blacque OE, Perens EA, Boroevich KA, Inglis PN, Li C, Warner A, Khattra J, Holt RA, Ou G, Mah AK, McKay SJ, Huang P, Swoboda P, Jones SJM, Marra MA, Baillie DL, Moerman DG, Shaham S, Leroux MR. 2005. Functional genomics of the cilium, a sensory organelle. Curr. Biol. 15:935–941. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Swoboda P, Adler HT, Thomas JH. 2000. The RFX-type transcription factor DAF-19 regulates sensory neuron cilium formation in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 5:411–421. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80436-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Piasecki BP, Burghoorn J, Swoboda P. 2010. Regulatory factor X (RFX)-mediated transcriptional rewiring of ciliary genes in animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:12969–12974. 10.1073/pnas.0914241107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tuch BB, Li H, Johnson AD. 2008. Evolution of eukaryotic transcription circuits. Science 319:1797–1799. 10.1126/science.1152398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Domínguez-Santos R, Martín J-F, Kosalková K, Prieto C, Ullán RV, García-Estrada C. 2012. The regulatory factor PcRFX1 controls the expression of the three genes of β-lactam biosynthesis in Penicillium chrysogenum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 49:866–881. 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schmitt EK, Bunse A, Janus D, Hoff B, Friedlin E, Kürnsteiner H, Kück U. 2004. Winged helix transcription factor CPCR1 is involved in regulation of β-lactam biosynthesis in the fungus Acremonium chrysogenum. Eukaryot. Cell 3:121–134. 10.1128/EC.3.1.121-134.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schmitt EK, Kück U. 2000. The fungal CPCR1 protein, which binds specifically to β-lactam biosynthesis genes, is related to human regulatory factor X transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 275:9348–9357. 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoff B, Schmitt EK, Kück U. 2005. CPCR1, but not its interacting transcription factor AcFKH1, controls fungal arthrospore formation in Acremonium chrysogenum. Mol. Microbiol. 56:1220–1233. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04626.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu SY, McLeod M. 1995. The sak1+ gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes an RFX family DNA-binding protein that positively regulates cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated exit from the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1479–1488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bugeja HE, Hynes MJ, Andrianopoulos A. 2010. The RFX protein RfxA is an essential regulator of growth and morphogenesis in Penicillium marneffei. Eukaryot. Cell 9:578–591. 10.1128/EC.00226-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Desjardins AE. 2006. Fusarium mycotoxins: chemistry, genetics, and biology. APS Press, St. Paul, MN [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parry DW, Jenkinson P, McLeod L. 1995. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals—a review. Plant Pathol. 44:207–238. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02773.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fernando WGD, Paulitz TC, Seaman WL, Dutilleul P, Miller JD. 1997. Head blight gradients caused by Gibberella zeae from area sources of inoculum in wheat field plots. Phytopathology 87:414–421. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.4.414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trail F, Gaffoor I, Vogel S. 2005. Ejection mechanics and trajectory of the ascospores of Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fuarium graminearum). Fungal Genet. Biol. 42:528–533. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trail F, Xu H, Loranger R, Gadoury D. 2002. Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum). Mycologia 94:181–189. 10.2307/3761794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jenkinson P, Parry DW. 1994. Splash dispersal of conidia of Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium avenaceum. Mycol. Res. 98:506–510. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80468-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Trail F. 2009. For blighted waves of grain: Fusarium graminearum in the postgenomics era. Plant Physiol. 149:103–110. 10.1104/pp.108.129684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kazan K, Gardiner DM, Manners JM. 2012. On the trail of a cereal killer: recent advances in Fusarium graminearum pathogenomics and host resistance. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13:399–413. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00762.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leslie JF, Summerell BA. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual, 1st ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cappellini RA, Peterson JL. 1965. Macroconidium formation in submerged cultures by a non-sporulating strain of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia 57:962–966. 10.2307/3756895 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Harris SD. 2005. Morphogenesis in germinating Fusarium graminearum macroconidia. Mycologia 97:880–887. 10.3852/mycologia.97.4.880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Core Team R 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yu JH, Hamari Z, Han KH, Seo JA, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Scazzocchio C. 2004. Double-joint PCR: a PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 41:973–981. 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee T, Han Y-K, Kim K-H, Yun S-H, Lee Y-W. 2002. Tri13 and Tri7 determine deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-producing chemotypes of Gibberella zeae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2148–2154. 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2148-2154.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Raju NB. 1986. A simple fluorescent staining method for meiotic chromosomes of Neurospora. Mycologia 78:901–906. 10.2307/3807428 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seong K-Y, Zhao X, Xu J-R, Güldener U, Kistler HC. 2008. Conidial germination in the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 45:389–399. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee S-H, Lee J, Lee S, Park E-H, Kim K-W, Kim M-D, Yun S-H, Lee Y-W. 2009. GzSNF1 is required for normal sexual and asexual development in the ascomycete Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot. Cell 8:116–127. 10.1128/EC.00176-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Son H, Seo Y-S, Min K, Park AR, Lee J, Jin J-M, Lin Y, Cao P, Hong S-Y, Kim E-K, Lee S-H, Cho A, Lee S, Kim M-G, Kim Y, Kim J-E, Kim J-C, Choi GJ, Yun S-H, Lim JY, Kim M, Lee Y-H, Choi Y-D, Lee Y-W. 2011. A phenome-based functional analysis of transcription factors in the cereal head blight fungus, Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002310. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Manners JM. 2009. Novel genes of Fusarium graminearum that negatively regulate deoxynivalenol production and virulence. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 22:1588–1600. 10.1094/MPMI-22-12-1588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.He J, Yang R, Zhou T, Tsao R, Young JC, Zhu H, Li X-Z, Boland GJ. 2007. Purification of deoxynivalenol from Fusarium graminearum rice culture and mouldy corn by high-speed counter-current chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1151:187–192. 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seo J-A, Kim J-C, Lee D-H, Lee Y-W. 1996. Variation in 8-ketotrichothecenes and zearalenone production by Fusarium graminearum isolates from corn and barley in Korea. Mycopathologia 134:31–37. 10.1007/BF00437050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Olive PL, Banath JP. 2006. The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat. Protoc. 1:23–29. 10.1038/nprot.2006.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim HK, Yun SH. 2011. Evaluation of potential reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR analysis in Fusarium graminearum under different culture conditions. Plant Pathol. J. 27:301–309. 10.5423/PPJ.2011.27.4.301 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5:621–628. 10.1038/nmeth.1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, Tetko I, Güldener U, Mannhaupt G, Münsterkötter M, Mewes HW. 2004. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:5539–5545. 10.1093/nar/gkh894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Povirk LF, Wübker W, Köhnlein W, Hutchinson F. 1977. DNA double-strand breaks and alkali-labile bonds produced by bleomycin. Nucleic Acids Res. 4:3573–3580. 10.1093/nar/4.10.3573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stubbe J, Kozarich JW. 1987. Mechanisms of bleomycin-induced DNA-degradation. Chem. Rev. 87:1107–1136. 10.1021/cr00081a011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wong P, Walter M, Lee W, Mannhaupt G, Münsterkötter M, Mewes H-W, Adam G, Güldener U. 2011. FGDB: revisiting the genome annotation of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D637–D639. 10.1093/nar/gkq1016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Khanna KK, Jackson SP. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27:247–254. 10.1038/85798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Desjardins AE, Proctor RH, Bai GH, McCormick SP, Shaner G, Buechley G, Hohn TM. 1996. Reduced virulence of trichothecene-nonproducing mutants of Gibberella zeae in wheat field tests. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 9:775–781. 10.1094/MPMI-9-0775 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jansen C, von Wettstein D, Schäfer W, Kogel K-H, Felk A, Maier FJ. 2005. Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:16892–16897. 10.1073/pnas.0508467102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Koç A, Wheeler LJ, Mathews CK, Merrill GF. 2004. Hydroxyurea arrests DNA replication by a mechanism that preserves basal dNTP pools. J. Biol. Chem. 279:223–230. 10.1074/jbc.M303952200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, Goldman ASH, Helleday T. 2005. Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:3799–3811. 10.1093/nar/gki681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gygax SE, Semighini CP, Goldman GH, Harris SD. 2005. SepBCTF4 is required for the formation of DNA-damage-induced UvsCRAD51 foci in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 169:1391–1402. 10.1534/genetics.104.030817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fenech M, Kirsch-Volders M, Natarajan AT, Surralles J, Crott JW, Parry J, Norppa H, Eastmond DA, Tucker JD, Thomas P. 2011. Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis 26:125–132. 10.1093/mutage/geq052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wakabayashi M, Ishii C, Hatakeyama S, Inoue H, Tanaka S. 2010. ATM and ATR homologues of Neurospora crassa are essential for normal cell growth and maintenance of chromosome integrity. Fungal Genet. Biol. 47:809–817. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harris SD, Kraus PR. 1998. Regulation of septum formation in Aspergillus nidulans by a DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Genetics 148:1055–1067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bowden RL, Leslie JF. 1999. Sexual recombination in Gibberella zeae. Phytopathology 89:182–188. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.2.182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hong S-Y, So J, Lee J, Min K, Son H, Park C, Yun S-H, Lee Y-W. 2010. Functional analyses of two syntaxin-like SNARE genes, GzSYN1 and GzSYN2, in the ascomycete Gibberella zeae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 47:364–372. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee J, Lee T, Lee Y-W, Yun S-H, Turgeon BG. 2003. Shifting fungal reproductive mode by manipulation of mating type genes: obligatory heterothallism of Gibberella zeae. Mol. Microbiol. 50:145–152. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03694.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Son H, Lee J, Park AR, Lee Y-W. 2011. ATP citrate lyase is required for normal sexual and asexual development in Gibberella zeae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 48:408–417. 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Son H, Min K, Lee J, Raju NB, Lee Y-W. 2011. Meiotic silencing in the homothallic fungus Gibberella zeae. Fungal Biol. 115:1290–1302. 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


